The Angels inked infielder Zack Cozart to a three-year, $38MM contract after the 2017 season, but now he surely counts as one of their least effective big-money signings in recent memory. When the Angels brought Cozart in, they expected he would carry what looked like a breakout offensive season into the future. That didn’t happen. In fact, Cozart’s tenure with the Halos went so poorly that they essentially sold him and the $12MM-plus left on his contract to the Giants over the winter. The Angels had to include young shortstop Will Wilson, their first-round pick last summer, in the deal in order to get Cozart’s money off the books, and the Giants quickly released Cozart. He hasn’t found a new team since then.
For the most part, Cozart had an unspectacular run with the Reds, who selected him in the second round of the 2007 draft. From his 2011 debut through the 2016 campaign, he was roughly a one- to two-WAR type of player who wasn’t much of a threat as a hitter. He only combined to slash .246/.289/.385 (80 wRC+) in those seasons, but exceptional glovework made him a regular. Cozart managed 43 Defensive Runs Saved and a 31.4 Ultimate Zone Rating at shortstop during that span.
Considering his track record, the Reds would have been right to expect another low-offense, high-end defensive year out of Cozart in 2017. Instead, though, he produced a career campaign at the plate that helped make him one of the most valuable players in baseball. Owing in part to a significant increase in walks and a much higher batting average on balls in play than usual, Cozart hit .297/.385/.548 (139 wRC+) with a personal-best 24 home runs in 507 plate appearances. Between the increased offense and his above-average defense (4 DRS, 4 UZR), Cozart logged 5.0 fWAR. The timing couldn’t have been better for him, but the Reds weren’t fully convinced he was suddenly a star player. They didn’t issue Cozart a qualifying offer after his outstanding campaign, which surely made him more appealing to teams seeking infield help on the open market.
Although Cozart was a shortstop throughout his Cincinnati stint, he ultimately wound up with the Angels as a third baseman/second baseman. He wasn’t going to steal the shortstop job from Andrelton Simmons – one of the greatest defenders the game has ever seen – but the hope was that the two would eat up every ground ball that came their way, and that Cozart’s offensive explosion would prove to be sustainable. Unfortunately, though, Cozart was just passable, not extraordinary, as a defender with the Angels. In a little over 600 combined innings between the keystone and third from 2018-19, he recorded zero DRS and 1.0 UZR. But his value truly torpedoed because of his work at the plate, where he hit a hideous .190/.261/.296 (54 wRC+) with five homers and minus-0.6 fWAR as a member of the club.
Worsening matters, various injuries limited Cozart to a meager 96 games and 360 trips to the plate in an Angels uniform. Just last July, a left shoulder ailment forced Cozart to undergo season-ending shoulder surgery. That pretty much concluded Cozart’s run with the Angels, and it helped pave the way for the signing of third baseman Anthony Rendon to a seven-year, $245MM contract this past offseason.
Had Cozart actually lived up to his contract, it’s anyone’s guess whether Rendon would have turned into an Angel. Regardless, Cozart now counts as one of the most regrettable signings in franchise history, and it’s unclear whether the 34-year-old will ever play in the majors again. To Cozart’s credit, though, he can say something that most major leaguers can’t: He was a 5.0-WAR player once whose performance earned him a sizable payday.
Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.
acarneglia
Is Cozart the same guy that Votto bought a donkey?
angels fan 3
Yes
joeshmoe11
Yup. He promised to buy him a donkey if he made the ASG and he did after Zack made it
Stevil
Yeah, and that reminds me of a bet between Ken Griffey Jr. and Lou Piniella, loser would owe the winner a steak dinner.
Griffey lost, and a week later he had a cow (living) delivered into Lou’s office.
stewartnbuck
an Angel error? should be Angels errors, i could write a book on how many errors B.E. has made in his short but dismal career as the Angels GM
AZPat
The angels got the donkey in the trade too.
Sopro Found
Just think..we actually picked him OVER Didi Gregorius..
andrewgauldin
Huh? Are you talking about in free agency? Because they were not free agents in the same year.
DodgerNation
The Reds held Didi coming up through the farm and traded him to the D-Backs before he ever became a real contributor.
andrewgauldin
Yeah I remember that. But was it gonna be Didi or Cozart? And they opted with Didi?
joeyvottoforpresident
Yeah I don’t think it was that big of a mistake, cozart clearly the defender is likely the main reason. They thought cozart would have more offensive value. He flashed it at times but then would get hurt. He put it together in 2017 and it worked out for everyone more or less so it’s all good.
AZPat
I love when fans say ‘we’ like they played for the team. You didn’t pick him over Didi, your favorite team did. Shotzie was more a member of the team than you.
afsooner02
I figured it would be massive over payments to Josh Hamilton or Albert Pujols or Matt Harvey.
Brixton
Pujols wasn’t an overpay
jbigz12
Pujols wasn’t an overpay! Going to have to disagree strongly w that.
AngelDiceClay
He got the Angels a $3Billion TV contract. Although he hasn’t put up the huge numbers he put in St. Louis. He didn’t tank. He’s closing in on 700 HR’s
afsooner02
You would have got the tv contract anyway with trout.
240 million for 1 wic birth over 8 years so far and a guy who won’t wear you cap in the HOF is a massive overpay….you did nothing when he had a few years of prime. Now you’re stuck with a slow DH for 2 more years at 60 million.
MLB-what-ifs
Afs- agree 100 percent
RockHard
Dumb ass..
MLB-what-ifs
Rock head – be more specific….the writer, Halo. The GM (my vote), or afsoon ( who is correct).
GMs should not spend on past their PEAK players unless they have a competitive, balanced team that needs the last price or two. If a team is starting a rebuild by getting a Puljos then by the time the team is ready to compete their expensive star will be too old….
Cam
Pujols has put up 6.3 fWAR in 8 seasons with the Angels, while costing $192mil in salary so far. He still has another 2 seasons and $48mil to go, and has been a negative performer for the last 3 seasons straight, at a non-premium position.
Overpay.
Brixton
You can absolutely say he wasn’t worth a deal, but when it was signed, he absolutely was worth 240M over 10 on the market, considering the Marlins topped that offer, and the Cards offered offered similar value over 8 years too.
overpay and not being worth the deal aren’t the same thing.
Cam
I hear what you’re saying, but..it is possible that Miami and STL also made bad decisions. They were just fortunate there’s only one Pujols and only one Team made the ultimate mistake. More than one team can be wrong at a time.
There were detractors at the time the deal was signed – Pujols had just put up career lows in AVG, OBP, SLG and BB%. He was already ageing. And the detractors were proven right – it was an overpay and too long of a contract.
marcfrombrooklyn
True. It’s the difference between a hindsight evaluation of what was paid versus what the player produced versus an evaluation of what the market should have valued the player at the time of signing.
Vizionaire
cards first offered a 6 year deal. then 10/220.
MLB-what-ifs
GMs need to look at what an aging player will produce (especially at his health, conditioning, mileage on the arm for pitchers, and position played) to see if they are worth the $. As an example, Betts may be worth $30 million age 27 to 35 – 8 yrs $240 to $280 million, but more years than that is crazy. Pujols, Stanton, A-rod maybe to age 38, but not 42. They are simply a waist of money by that point.
I love the Bloom hiring as I would rather see more minor league guy come to MLB than FA signings. Devers, Bogaerts, Benintendi, Betts, Bradley, Vazquez, were all from the system.
Vizionaire
harvey? peanuts!
Oxford Karma
The Harvey one doesn’t compare. It was a one year deal. Guys sign at the 8-12 million one year deal regularly. The Pujols deal was an overpay, but it was the lifetime Angel contract, so it’s about more than baseball. Hamilton was dumb all around.
cecildawg
Oxford karma? Hamilton was dumb all around. No doubt. Hamilton changed his
diet just before coming to the Angles. He did a moron move. He thought, sure seems, that he knew more than he did. He wrecked his strength. He lost a lot
because of his diet. A true stereotype of the limited athlete, with the drugs and drinking, thinking he is smart because people admire him.
looiebelongsinthehall
It was by all accounts a rotten deal but the average cost and number of years involved don’t make it one of the worst deals ever. Jason Bey and Carl Crawford anyone? Even Bey was just four years as I recall. If that hurt, the Darvish and Hayward deals make you scream in pain.
HalosHeavenJJ
Exactly. Pujols at least tried but he’s 45 and done. Hambone never even tried then took no responsibility for his actions, as usual.
MWeller77
Mo Vaughn’s contract gets an honorable mention. No one could’ve predicted that freak accident in the dugout, of course, but that signing did not produce a good outcome for the Angels
MLB-what-ifs
Agree it was a bad signing!
Mo Vaughn’s swing was perfect for Fenway. He was never going to produce for the Angels as well as he did for Boston.
Angels & NL West
Yep. Angel fans won’t be bragging about this one. Nor will we be bragging about last years crop of FA signings – Cody Allen, Justin Bour, Trevor Cahill, Matt Harvey and Johnathon Lucroy… ouch.
Hopefully, Rendon will help us forget about those past signings.
HalosHeavenJJ
At the time a quality glove and meh bat, good for 2-2.5 WAR per year seemed OK at that price point.
But Fletcher showed up and did everything better and cheaper, making Cozart redundant.
At least Zack just had to be his normal self for the co tract to be OK. It’s not like the total gamble on Harvey.
johnnydubz
Jed Lowrie is worse. 9 games for cool $20 million
nymetsking
It’s not over yet. He might get to 12.
MLB-what-ifs
Last year Lowrie had 7 ABs …..$1,429,000 per AB……that’s value
Briffle2
Lowrie is always hurt, should’ve never been signed.
LouisianaAstros
There are just some players who are meant to play in the Mausoleum in Oakland
Lowrie is one.
A’s always bring the best out in him.
I wouldn’t be surprise to see him with the A’s again.
Regarding Cozart
The offensive numbers were an one year wonder in a walk year
I didn’t think he was going to put up those type of numbers with the Angels.
Just a bad move but the Angels at the time needed a player who could play 3rd.
Cozart was a possibility if he stayed healthy.
That 2018 Angels team could have presented a challenge if everything fell in place
But injuries derailed them.
Yep it is
Just another Epller genius move. How does him and Preller in San Diego still have jobs?
Stevil
Do you really think Eppler is making decisions on big-ticket free agents?
Preller’s another story. He’s done great with young pitching, but failed miserably with free agent signings and developing fielders. I would imagine he’s in the hot-seat.
jekporkins
@Stevil I’ll disagree.. Frankly, I don’t even see how he’s done ‘great’ with pitchers. Brad Hand and Kirby broke out and were steals from the waiver wire, but has anyone else stepped up in the five years he’s been in charge and become an ace? You can point at potential studs all you want but it’s been five years and nobody yet has become Maddux or even Andy Benes.
All I ever hear is ‘next year the Padres are going to explode” and every year they play under .500 ball.
Stevil
I was referring to the drafting and development of pitchers. Gore, Patino, Paddock, Lamet, and even Quantrill. That’s a pretty promising group, and yes, they still have to prove themselves.
On the flipside, Tatis (a trade acquisition) is the only fielder in a regular role and Ty France is the only other one ready, or even near ready, to start contributing if given a chance.
But the bigger point was that Preller hasn’t done enough and should be in the hot seat.
Geno55
No I think arte Moreno makes the big ticket decisions with free agents But Billy Eppler made alot of bad little signings
dirkg
Just so we’re clear, are you saying Arte Moreno wanted Zack Cozart?
hOsEbEeLiOn
When you steal talent away from other organizations for scraps you’re afforded a longer leash.
Preller was brought in for his scouting and drafting expertise.
He’s lived up to what he was hired for. His free agent signings have been his weakest area but drafting and scouting talent he’s excelled at those.
Tatis Jr, Paddack, Matt Strahm were huge gets for practically nothing.
He turned Brad Hand and Kirby Yates from scrap heap players into elite closers. Found usefulness out of guys like Ryan Buchter and Craig Stammen.
And his international expertise has seen Patino, Baez, Olivares (from Jays), Tatis Jr(from White Sox), Ronald Bolanos, Andres Munoz, Emmanuel Clase (traded away), Jose Torres (from Athletics), Jose Castillo (from Rays), Luis Perdomo seemed to find something in relief last year (from Cardinals), and others push their way up to the majors.
Draft wise he’s found guys later, round 15 and later, on like Ty France, Phil Maton, David Bednar, Trey Wingenter.
Results haven’t been there in the win department but he’s found talent in unlikely places more often than most GM’s seem to.
AngelDiceClay
How did article become The Peller history lesson.
jekporkins
I don’t see how he has lived up to what he was hired for. He was hired to win, pure and simple. He did it by completely rebuilding the club, but over the last couple of years, some of those prospects were supposed to step up and change the team into the next Dodgers or Braves. I have yet to see it. You can handpick a couple of steals with Kirby and Hand, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. The Padres are going on 10 straight seasons of under .500 ball and he’s been in charge for over half of them.
It’s always next year for the Padres. If they don’t win this year I don’t’ think Preller’s stellar scouting is going to matter when he’s canned. Ownership pretty much said that in the offseason.
1738hotlinebling
I don’t understand how players like this feel comfortable taking all that money they are not earning
joeshmoe11
Because they’re human and someone offers them money and they presumably give their best effort.
Stevil
The same reason teams like the Dodgers don’t feel guilty for paying league-minimum to a player like Bellinger.
They take what they can get. Few will empathize with billionaire owners who have paid beans to countless players and profited enormously.
AngelDiceClay
If you’re talking about a players first few years in the majors, as a owner why wouldn’t you? They’re simply abiding by the rules of the CBA. A CBA that players and owners agreed to
Except for Lyman Bostcock in 1978, I’ve never heard of a player offering to give back his salary after getting off to a poor start. Or after having a bad season which is what this article about Cozart is about.
Stevil
Try reading the comment I responded to, then my comment one more time.
MLB-what-ifs
Stevil – the “beans” to you at $550,000 is still more than many CEOs, most CFO, corporate attorneys, top level managers…… four years of “beans” is more than the average American in their entire working career…..
Just for perspective ….. and are the people buying the tickets that help pay the salaries
Stevil
It’s not just the major-leaguers and understanding the context is important. Many players do make beans comparatively.
MLB-what-ifs
If my son got drafted and had a full ride scholarship for baseball, I would advise him to take the scholarship unless it was a signing bonus of over $1 million, because 97 percent of drafted player never make the major and never make any money. Do not blame the owners. Decrease the number of round of players drafted. For most of those players it is false hope and they will never even reach AA.
Oh they just proposed what I have thought for decades….
C. A. Hevia
There are far fewer MLB players than any of those other positions you mentioned. When you’re in the top 0.01% of the people capable of doing what you do, you should get paid accordingly …. There is no questions MLB teams massively profit off players, people comparing them to regular professions can’t see the forest for the trees.
Stevil
That logic supports everything I’ve been saying: Take what you (or he) can get; Nothing in the future is guaranteed
My comment was meant to be neutral. I don’t think players should feel guilty for taking a check despite struggling or injuries; Owners shouldn’t (and don’t) feel guilty for getting value out of pre-arb years.
I was simply trying to explain to a commenter why players don’t feel guilty.
MLB-what-ifs
You just agreed with me….CEOs make millions and so do mlb players (even a few years of league minimum) compared as the massive number of hourly workers. The “forest” is the average household income of $45,000 to $55,000 per year depending on state vs $550,000 minimum mlb. Looking at the wrong forest. Maybe you are in Sequoia National Park.
prov356
It is known that the fewer people standing in line behind you who can do what you do, the more you will be paid. Very few people can play baseball at the MLB level. That’s why they get paid.
Stevil
Keep in mind that players dedicate years of their lives in an effort to realize their dream of being major-leaguers. They don’t make much of anything before they get there–if they get there. That time has a price. It’s money they’re not making, retirement they’re not earning, etc.,
AngelDiceClay
Because most players are actually signed for what they’ve done. Hoping they will continue down that path.
Stevil
You got that backwards. Players are signed for what their new respective clubs believe they will do. History obviously factors into the projections, but it’s always about the future.
AngelDiceClay
Didn’t I say the team is hoping they continue down that path? Players are signed for what they did prior. How else do they arrive at the value of the contract?
Stevil
Yeah, hoping they continue is a given. But they are not paid for what they have done, which you have clearly stated twice now. It’s always about what they are projected to do moving forward (which I have clearly stated twice now).
There is a difference.
AngelDiceClay
So how did the Angels and Mike Trout’s agent come to a agreement he should be paid $37M a year for 10 years starting next year?
Compared to
Yasiel Puig who came in the league in 2013 (A year later than Trout)
Has made a total off $25M and can’t find a team. ?
MLB-what-ifs
Stevil – agree!!! that GMs should be signing players for what they will do!!!!
All the “pay Betts what he wants 12 year $420 mil“ were crazy. Age 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 he will not be worth $35 mil per year.
“The owners are billionaires, just pay them the money” comments are dumb. If the GMs use some common sense, then they will not have waste millions on bad contracts.
Stevil
Are you serious? Mike Trout, thee MIKE TROUT, age 28–in the middle of his prime–who is projected to put up 23 fWAR over the next three years alone? Do you realize that even his declining years have enormous value and that having the face of the franchise, one of the greatest players of all-time, retire as an Angel has value?
Puig has had offers, but are you seriously struggling to understand why there was a general lack of interest in him? How does he even fit into this conversation? Even if he was relevant, his lack of a contract or $ offered would support everything I’ve been saying.
Do some research on this. Ask an analyst, or even a seasoned journalist, about why players are paid. They’ll tell you exactly the same thing.
prov356
Puig’s performance has declined every year in the majors to now being just an average player. That, combined with his problematic ego, is why he is unsigned. He’s not worth the trouble for an average player who only played 49 games last season.
MLB-what-ifs
Mike Trout is an exception to every rule that exists. There is only one Mike Trout.
Ted Williams (missing three years in the war) might have been the closest.
BA lifetime – .344
OPS lifetime – 1.116
OBP lifetime – .482
HR lifetime – 521
WAR – 121.9
Mike Trout will probably be the best player in the league at 45.
Stevil
Mike Trout is getting paid for what he will do.
This shouldn’t be so hard for some of these fans. Teams don’t sign players for what they have done with a different team, and extensions behave the same.
Geno55
Ted Williams lost 5 years of his playing time 2 stents in the war
Geno55
Ted Williams lost 5 years of his playing time 2 stents in the war.
Afk711
They earned it when someone felt they were worth it in free agency. Don’t be a weirdo.
MLB-what-ifs
Afk711 – the only weirdos are people who spend way beyond their means and wonder why they have no money in retirement or have to work until they are 75 like half of California
Taxifornia.
Dixon Miaz
Lol the giants stole Simmons successor
AngelDiceClay
They didn’t steal him. The Angels wanted to clear salary to sign their first choice Cole. When that didn’t happen they turned they’re attention to Rendon. Wouldn’t you take etheir one for unproven prospect?
Dixon Miaz
It’s a steal because the angels did something stupid and signed Cozart for big money. That costed them a first round pick. They gave away a first round draft pick (top 15) that didn’t even start a full season so they could sign Rendon. Which Is stupid because, even with Rendon, the angels aren’t making the playoffs. So not only did Rendon cost 250 million. He cost a 1st round and 2nd round draft pick… for a guy who’s going to be in his 30s when he first plays….
Stevil
I would argue it was a steal for LA. Sure, they made a mistake. But they dumped over 12.6 million for a player that won’t play SS, as you suggested, and has a limited ceiling. He projects as an average regular (45 grade prospect). There’s value in that, but that number comes down considerably when you start with 12.6+ million.
Afk711
They didn’t steal him, the Angels knew exactly what they were doing. They signed Rendon right after this trade
C. A. Hevia
Wilson ranked like 4th on the Angels SS depth chart. Hes likely the highest floor lowest ceiling of the bunch,I wish him well but he is the player that least resembled the Eppler draft mood of high risk, high reward.
Rangers29
I took a deep dive on Cozart’s 2017 season, because it is very rare to see a player go from that good for one season, to god awful the next. There are three stats that stuck out to me when I saw this, babip, IP%, and his walk total. (BTW I am not taking into account his rookie season when he had limited appearances) In 17′ Cozart’s babip was the highest of his career, but it was still only .312, his next highest was .027 points lower. Related to his batting average of .297, I’d say he didn’t get that lucky. Here’s the stat that strikes the most, IP%, and it means “balls in play percentage”. That is the percentage of all plate appearances in which Cozart got a hit, and it was 67%, the lowest of his career by 4%. Finally, his walk total was 62, which is 25 more than any other year in his career! So was this sustainable? My answer is no. Even though none of the stats screams luck, they add up. He had his highest batting average on balls in play of his career, but only got a hit 67% of the time he went to the plate. His .385 obs was outrageous compared to the rest of his career, and that was because of his immense walk total. His 24 homers and 24 doubles made the hits he did get way more effective. All in all, for everything t click the way it did for a player that had never done that in his career seems completely unsustainable. IDK why anybody would sign him for that much.
thunderbolt
Most GMs are bad at their jobs. The End.
Psychguy
I wonder how much longer Eppler gets? He inherited a poor situation, but other than Adell ?
Vizionaire
he made some dumb moves in the past but seems to be going in the right direction. even though i may have been his harshest critique in the past i hope he gets an extension.
jaysfan1994
Albert Pujols, Josh Hamilton, CJ Wilson. The Angels have made some bad FA signings.
Psychguy
Along with Harvey and Cahill, just plain awful, but also some bad luck: Nick Adenhart and Tyler Skaggs.
AngelDiceClay
All teams make bad signings.?The Angels have a owner that takes bigger risk than most.
Stevil
That’s fair, but I would argue the Angels have an owner that takes unnecessary risks.
Vizionaire
pujols was pure business move. harvey and carhil allowed the team to get the top 10 pick.. worked in a strange way.
MLB-what-ifs
Halo – bigger risk, but bigger and more misses that have doomed them are almost two decades. It is not the fans fault, the GM has been terrible.
It reminds me of Ben Cherington with Pablo Sandoval, Hanley Ramirez, Rusney Castillo – $255 million just for those three (all horrible and released or DFA before their contract completed)…..AllenCraig $38 million and Joe Kelly (terrible for 5 years except for 2018 WS)….there were lots of reasons he got fired….I liked Cherington, but he was bad….
Vizionaire
so, you are an average troll and arte moreno is worth at least $3 billion! and he started from literally nothing! take that, troll!
MLB-what-ifs
Vizion – stevil was just trying to say Arte Moreno and the front office could have gotten better value for their money. Arte is a great owner as far as spending money and trying to win. Maybe building the farm system to get a core of young, controllable, solid players then supplementing with free agents would have been better. Lots of expensive free agents without a solid core usually fails with the first few injuries
Stevil
Vizionaire, who are you calling a troll (I honestly don’t know)?
But let me ask you this: Do you think Moreno has played his cards well? It’s good that he is willing to spend and wants a competitive team each and every year. But how he goes about that is debatable and the record with big-named free agents speaks for itself.
Geno55
Moreno Is a lousy handicapper of free agents In the early years when he bought the team From Disney The Angels and Moreno had some success but riding on Disney’s coat tails Actually Billy Bavasi drafted all those 2002 World Series Players Disney hired Bill Stoneman bill Stoneman hired Mike Scioscia no on the other hand Moreno hired Tony Reagan’s Jerry DiPoto Billy Eppler you get the picture
prov356
Cozart was a bust, but I think Hamilton was worse because his off-field antics were well documented. We paid him a fortune even after we dished him back to the Rangers. That was painful.
As for Pujols, I argue he has been a better contributor than some give him credit for. With all the stat minutia, RBIs still win games. For his six healthy seasons with the Angels (averaging over 600 plate appearances), Pujols averaged 103 RBIs per season. When you include his 2 seasons below 500 plate appearances, he still averaged over 93 RBIs. His big issue is he runs slower than my grandmother so infield ground balls hit deep to the left side are still an easy out.
GrandpaBaseball
Observation from lsftfield bleachers. Owners should profit, MLB is a business……Cozart deal at the time made sense and should not be held against Eppler……Puljos was a dumb signing in that aAlbert was showing signs of early aging the last season in STL……Tori Hunter was a great FA signing……If B. Eppler has an issue of knowledge it woud be fair to say it lays in scouting and drafting especially with knowledge of pitching and pitchers……3 bad one year deals on ’19 pitchers, but he picked up Goodwin and traded for a back up infielder who made an All Star team. Year prior made a trade with Kinsler to Boston and came out with a decent reliver alog with a deal with Tampa for a prospect really to emerge as a ML 2b. …..Eppler has problem with knowing catchers though. Seems to draft DH types as Catcher and trades or releases good ones to end up with bad ones. I still do not get Stassi…..3 managers in 3 seasons, hmm…..l do not believe Rendon is a good signing, but we might have to eat those words, we will see…Long live Trouty.
JoeBrady
It feels almost like the GMs make mistakes that always identical.
1-A mediocre player with one big contract year.
2-Signed on the wrong side of 30 (in this case, a solid 32).
3-Switching positions, so you pay for a defensive SS, but don’t play him at SS.
It never works out, but never stops anyone.