MassLive.com’s Chris Cotillo and Sean McAdam touched on an assortment of Red Sox topics in the latest edition of their Fenway Rundown podcast, including a brief mention of Trevor Story’s status as the shortstop considers an opt-out clause in his contract. Cotillo believes “the Red Sox are pretty cautiously very optimistic that” Story will be staying with the team, and while’s plenty of grey area within that statement, it does offer some indication that Story is leaning towards declining his opt-out.
Story is owed $25MM in each of the next two seasons, plus there’s a $5MM buyout on his $25MM club option for the 2028 campaign. The Red Sox can override Story’s opt-out by guaranteeing that 2028 club option right now, but that doesn’t appear to be on the team’s radar, so the ball looks to be entirely in Story’s court. While Story’s .263/.308/.433 slash line and 25 homers over 654 plate appearances only translates to a 101 wRC+, his numbers were weighed down by a cold start to the season, as Story posted an .825 OPS over his final 429 PA.
Between this strong finish and a thin free agent shortstop market, there’s a case for Story to leave his $55MM guaranteed on the table and look for a bigger contract this winter. On the flip side, Story turns 33 next month, his defensive metrics were subpar, and the injury problems that plagued him in 2022-24 will be on the minds of front offices even though Story stayed pretty healthy in 2025. If Story wants to avoid the risks of another prolonged stint in free agency, staying in Boston with a contending Red Sox team certainly seems like a viable choice.
More from around the AL East…
- Earlier this month, Jon Heyman of the New York Post floated Cubs bench coach Ryan Flaherty as a logical candidate to be part of the Orioles’ managerial search. MASNsports.com’s Roch Kubatko reports that Flaherty did indeed interview with the O’s about the position before the club opted to hire Guardians associate manager Craig Albernaz. Any number of other names might’ve been considered by the Orioles, but Flaherty joins Albert Pujols, Luis Rojas, and Scott Servais as the candidates directly linked to Baltimore’s search whether in formal interviews or (in Servais’ case) just some interest on the club’s part. Flaherty’s six seasons as an Orioles player likely held some extra appeal for Baltimore’s front office, but his well-regarded work as a bench coach in Chicago and San Diego has put him in the running for multiple managerial vacancies. Flaherty is reportedly one of the finalists for the Twins’ job, and he is a candidate for both the Padres and Braves in their ongoing searches.
- The Rays hold a pair of club options on Brandon Lowe ($11.5MM) and Pete Fairbanks ($11MM) for the 2026 season, and both players have expressed a desire to remain in Tampa. Marc Topkin of the Tampa Bay Times explores the option decisions, noting that between the team’s offensive needs and how “the Rays typically view the bullpen as more changeable and volatile on a year-to-year basis,” Lowe seems more likely than Fairbanks to be part of the 2026 roster. This doesn’t necessarily mean that Fairbanks’ option will be declined, however, as the Rays would then lose the closer for nothing in free agency. Perhaps the most probable scenario is that Tampa Bay will pick up both options and then explore trade possibilities for either player — in Fairbanks’ case, his $11MM salary might not seem that onerous to some rival clubs in need of high-leverage bullpen help.

Picking up Fairbanks option could be a costly mistake for Tampa Bay. They might wind up getting stuck with him. Yeah, I’m not exactly his biggest fan. We know B Lowe has an extensive injury history, but at least they know what they are getting. Perhaps they could talk him into an extension over a longer period of time with a lower annual hit to those shallow Tampa Bay coffers. If he wants to stay in Tampa Bay perhaps B Lowe would be amenable to something of that nature. Perhaps as a future coach or in the front office too.
At 1/11M for a great RP and proven closer (20+ saves last 3 seasons) in a market with Diaz, Iglesias, Devin Williams, and even Ryan Helsley going to get paid, to varying degrees. Williams/Helsley may take pillow deals, but I doubt for lower than 1/11M. I’d see them picking up the option and trading him, where he’s been linked to ATL (Iglesias is a FA).
I don’t foresee another TB contract decline and ATL swooping in, like what happened with Morton years ago.
Its got Dodgers written all over it for Landon Knack and another arm
Picking up Fairbanks’ option is a pretty easy Rays’ decision as he has some trade value at 1/11. If the Rays include some cash, the return would be even better.
Mets. They need relievers, and they spend money.
“pretty cautiously very optimistic”
Jazz for Lowe. What team says No and why??
Why do you keep wanting to trade Jazz?
Tampa says no as Lowe has in my view MUCH more value. Jazz has warts to go with his talent and if I was building a team, I’d pass on him.
It’s the other way around. Jazz (4.2 WAR) just had a 30-30 season and played above average defense. Lowe’s (1.8) BB and K rates are trending backwards. For all his “warts”, there isn’t a single GM which would pick Lowe over Jazz when their ’26 salaries will be very similar.
They both have injury risk as Jazz seems to miss 20 or 30 games every season. Jazz is also a spazz on the basepaths and tends to want to make heroic defensive plays when he should just eat it. He’s a superb athlete but his baseball IQ is not the highest. I think Yanks will keep him for ’26 but then move on, if a trade doesn’t materialize.
Jazz’ baserunning run value is in the 86th percentile against Lowe’s 31st. Low baseball IQ or not, I’ll also take the player with far greater defensive range. Can’t be in the position to make a “heroic” play if you can’t reach the batted ball first.
I will take the guy who runs in to outs.The Yankees need those guys.
Dewey, the Rays are ALWAYS building. Maybe the new owner will be different, time will tell.
Cautiously optimistic, very pretty describes my better half.
I wish every major league player worried more about playing well than making more money. They make millions either way, so why not care about being a good ballplayer? Between fancy leagues, analytics, agents, free agency, ridiculous spending franchises, the game of baseball is almost unrecognizable. And pushing gambling? There’s a good idea, what could possibly go wrong?
Let’s go Blue Jays!
Tell us more about the old days, grandpa!
It all started to go downhill when they banned to spit ball.
What do you think Jason Varitek told his agent, Scott Boras? Get it done, I’m staying right here. That wasn’t that long ago but maybe you weren’t born yet.
Varitek did that was 20 years ago so yes it was a long time ago and the get it done price pretty much in line with what he would have gotten on the FA market too.
I seem to recall Judge turning down a bigger deal with SF to stay in NY. Sometimes money isn’t everything.
That said, money is also respect. Look at the entire Red Sox saga with Bogaerts and Devers. The Red Sox badly lowballed Bogaerts when they tried to extend him and that made a rift. It was disrespectful, especially in light of the contract he eventually signed. Boston then turned around and extended Devers for more than he was worth. The idea there was in light of Bogaerts, the trading of Betts, and a few other moves they needed to do something that said they respected their homegrown talent.
Of course, we’re now getting into the millionaires v. billionaires fight which no fan enjoys.
So because one player twenty years ago decided he didn’t want the hassle of moving his stuff all baseball players today… wait no I’m completely lost.
Also the Red Sox made Tek feel special by giving him that little “C” for his jersey. More teams should try to bribe guys with letters.
Don’t forget Sox ownership disrespecting players started with Jon Lester. At the time, I thought they were fair but in hindsight, they blew it. That said, Mookie was never coming back and the offer to Bogey wasn’t as bad as you say. The Padres bid against themselves and overpaid big time.
Better to be disrespectful to Bogaerts than to end up signing him to that ridiculous contract the Padres gave him.
It seems like most people have no idea how mid Bogaerts is now.
The ovbious sign of not being greedy and not caring about the money: having Scott Boras as your agent.
Hank – With all due respect, please research this subject before repeating false information you’ve heard from others.
FACT: Before becoming a free agent, Xander wanted only $20M more than what the Sox had just given Story ($140M).
FACT: The Red Sox offered only $90M/4 yrs before his last season in Boston, which amounted to just a 1-year $30M extension. It was extremely insulting.
Anybody who says the Red Sox would have needed to match or beat the Padres offer to keep Xander is very, very ignorant.
Looks like the the Red Sox 4 year offer to Bogaerts was realistic. In his first 3 years in SD, Bogaerts’ OPS was:
2023: .790
2024: .688
2025: .720
Looks like he is declining at age 33 and he has 8 years left on his contract.
Bingo, except Varitek had Boras and wasn’t all about the money. Wakefield was another one.
It’s ironic that the Bogaerts decision was the correct one in the end. Turns out he wasn’t worth what the Padres offered him, or anywhere close based on his production. Just because someone was willing to overpay, doesn’t mean he was “low-balled”. Turns out the Red Sox made a good decision in the end.
Betts flat out told management he was not going to re-sign with the team, which left them in a position where they were forced to trade him in order to get anything in return. Another good decision. Didn’t work out great in the end, but something was better than nothing, and the entire league knew he would not go back to Boston, so the Sox had zero leverage.
As for Devers, that was the stupid move and they were lucky to get the Giants to eat that contract in the end and they got 4 players in return (and if any of them produce, even better – but just getting rid of that cancer from the dugout was huge win). Look how well the team came together after he was gone and how a team expected to last place in the division ended up making the playoffs and is now a place some of the top free agents may want to come to next year, as they are a loaded offense without Devers and way better defensively. 7th most runs scored in baseball – without Devers.
@whyhayzee
This is the United States and in this country, 29 MLB teams (including your Red Sox) agree on mutual contracts, so the terms and money are never forced nor coerced into anyone’s hands except on the GM’s table after agreement.
Perhaps cricket is a better sport for you, as “pro franchise” cricket is wracked with corruption and disgruntled usually-unpaid or delayed-in-payment players… but representing international teams mean more, I guess, if you’re into that.
Go Yankees!
Pop – In all seriousness you sound like someone who is shilling for Red Sox management.
Xander: The Red Sox offered him the $90M before his final season in Boston began, and then deep into free agency they offered him the $160M he originally wanted … only when they realized he could likely leave. So even the Red Sox admitted $90M was a lowball offer, by doubling their offer just a few months later.
Betts: Prove it, provide a link quoting Mookie saying he didn’t want to stay with the Red Sox. I’ve given this same challenge to dozens of others over the years, they all ran and hid like cowards. Let’s see what you do.
Devers – So you’re saying Raffy’s mere presence caused Story, Casas, Rafaela, Wong etc to all suck? Does that mean Raffy should get credit for Bregman’s hot start, Campbell’s hot start, Abreu’s hot start, etc? LOLOLOL!!
And I suppose the fact Sox management held Roman in the minors until a week prior to trading Raffy had nothing to do with the Sox offense when Raffy was there …. right? LOLOLOL!!!
BTW – The Red Sox had a .535 winning percentage in games Bregman played, and a .583 winning percentage in games he didn’t play. So based on your hysterical logic, the Red Sox are better off without Bregman too. LOLOLOL!!!
Rumor in Detroit is, Scott Boras is using a fake birth certificate purchased on Queens Blvd for fifty bucks!
Red – what a nothing comment
I kind of feel like playing well directly correlates to making money.
I think if you look at it from the players perspective they are forced to treat thier time in mlb as a job with a very short shelf life as fans its easy for us to tell them not to care about trying to make every last dollar they can before its over…but to them its thier life and I for one dont blame them for making as much as they can while they can because sure wise investments can make it last but money up front is guaranteed
I’m gonna go join me a fancy league.
I fantasize about fancy leagues
Managers can’t even kick dirt on umps anymore! What is the world coming to?
D*mn Commies….
The big question for Story is not whether he can make more than the $55 million. With his skills and the lack of quality shortstops, SOMEONE would clearly give him more than 55 million over 4-5 years. The real question is what kind of deal he would be able to get two years from now when he is 35. Let’s say someone was willing to give him a 4/80 contract this offseason. Then his decision would be could he beat 2/25 two years from now. If he thinks he can do better than that in 2027, then he should not opt out and just take his chances then..
My gut is pretty cautiously very pessimistic in Story’s ability to stay semi-healthy next year.
Sean – Well here’s the thing, if playing 1,371 innings at shortstop this year (2nd-most in the league) is defined in the article as “staying pretty healthy”, then what do you consider “semi-healthy”? ;O)
Yeahhhh it’s a gut thing. Theres no rhyme or reason to it.
Story is staying
OK, so someone help me out with this, since I don’t follow the Red Sox as closely as I used to: didn’t Rafaela come up as a SS? Can’t they move on from Story and put Rafaela at SS which would solve the outfield situation?
Rafaela’s time at SS in the majors has been poor (-7 OAA at SS last season and a -2 DRS) but was absolutely elite in CF this season (20 DRS, 21 OAA, 22 defensive run value)
His bat isn’t anything special, so that glove in center is the only reason to keep him around as a starter. He’d be a potentially below average defender and bat at short.
Thanks…wasn’t sure.
Fat – Campbell and Mayer both could slot in at shortstop if Story leaves.
He’s also not a finished product with his bat when you compare his ’24 and ’25 Savant stats. Moving him back to SS from CF doesn’t make sense.
YBC – The only way moving Rafaela to SS would make sense is if it’s the only way to keep Abreu, Anthony and Duran in the outfield (assuming that’s what the Sox prefer).
Even then, I’d put Rafaela at 2B and have Mayer play SS.
Rafaela is one of the best CF’s in the game and keeps getting better defensively out there. His bat is also getting better every year and he’s only 25. His pitch selection is improving, his power increasing, and he runs the bases extremely well.
If anyone goes, it’s Duran. He had one good season, is much older, and simply is not needed moving forward, as good as a player as he is.
Pop said: “Rafaela’s bat is also getting better every year”
FACT: From July 18th thru the end of the regular season, Rafaela’s .587 OPS was the 2nd-lowest of all 160 qualified MLB players.
Rafaela is 2021-2023 JBJ.
@FatChance65 They can’t move on from Story if he doesn’t opt-out.
Is Story is any kind of a mensch he won’t opt out because he knows he owes the Red Sox big time for the seasons (if you add it all up) he’s spent on the injured list.
He actually doesn’t owe the Red Sox anything.
Maybe the team should take up that issue to him personally if they want.
Stein – Yeah what La La La said is like going into a casino and then demanding your money back because you lost.
Injury risk comes with every player, and the Red Sox knew about Story’s health issues when they signed him. They took the risk anyway, they gambled and lost. That’s on them, not Story. It was just one of many dumb gambles the Sox have taken on injury-prone players over the past 6 years.
FPG
What Trey Yesavage is doing is remarkable. At 21 years old. He was pitching in single A Dunedin at the beginning of this year. His playoff whip of 1.03 and 13.5 K’s s per 9 . Dominated a strong Dodger lineup . His unique delivery might be a cause for concern down the line. I hope not. Just throwing that out there
I did read an article on how the Sox should pursue Naylor as opposed to Alonso for 1stbase. I agree with this strategy. Less $$ ,less term. Doesn’t hit as many homeruns,but has a higher average,even steals a couple bases even though he is slow. Lol. I know he’s left-handed, Also doesn’t strikeout much. A little better defensively.
CDC – Yeah like I said I’m fine with Naylor, either fulltime 1B or a platoon with Casas or whomever.
I’m not surprised about Trey, he’s not much different than Early …. rookie who flew through the minors and has very little MLB experience which means nobody has a good book on him. It’s happened soooo many times in the postseason …. remember Wacha in 2013? Heck we just saw what Shittler did to the Sox in the WC round. Element of surprise (unfamiliarity) can be a huge advantage.
Fever- I hope they are not going to just rely on Casas. I assume at worst they will keep Lowe as I imagine he is the lowest priced option. I would much prefer Naylor. I would be surprised to see Story leave, I think he is in a good place now and with a solid couple of seasons could still make some decent money.
Uncle – The Sox will be monitoring Casas’ rehab throughout the winter, I think where he is around December will dictate whether they go outside the organization.
So if you sign Naylor, which I am fine with, where does Campbell play? I can’t see him going back to 2B or outfield.
Fever- I will be curious to see how Campbell develops. He obviously came up too quickly this past season. We still don’t know for sure what he can do in the majors.
We definitely have some prospects that have proven they are ready, but I am not ready to commit to Campbell yet. Amazing potential so I certainly hope he turns out as good as he was advertised.
I don’t know what kind of contract Naylor will be looking for as far as years are concerned. That would impact whether he is an option.
If Story stays they should seriously consider moving him to 2b and give Meyer a proper shot at short.
Story will stay he has said he wants to build on what he did last year.
Burn – Why can’t Story do that with another team, building on his 2025 season?