Outside of a surprise strike to land star closer Edwin Diaz during the Winter Meetings, it’s been an unusually quiet offseason for the Dodgers. On some level, that’s understandable. The team had no core players depart in free agency this offseason, and they just won their second consecutive World Series title back in November. While Los Angeles has spent the past few offseasons building up a juggernaut by adding players like Shohei Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Blake Snell, and Tyler Glasnow, there’s less urgency to continue piling on star talent at this point.
Coming off two World Series championships, it would be understandable for president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman and the rest of the team’s front office to be content bringing back mostly the same roster in 2026. Many signs point to them doing just that, as comments from team personnel have acknowledged the club’s aging roster and the importance of bringing along some younger players for the sake of the team’s long-term viability. Clayton Kershaw has retired. Freddie Freeman will play this year at age 36. Mookie Betts is headed into his age-33 season coming off the worst season of his Hall of Fame career. Even younger members of the team’s core like Ohtani (31), Snell (33), Glasnow (32), and Will Smith (31) are all on the wrong side of 30 at this point.
With many of core veterans under contract for years to come beyond their respective primes, even the mighty Dodgers have to think twice about adding another long-term, nine-figure contract to the books. At the outset of the offseason, many assumed that Los Angeles would once again be a top player in the market for the winter’s stars, like Kyle Tucker and Bo Bichette. As the offseason dragged on, however, it quickly became clear that L.A. wasn’t interested in jumping the market for a top free agent as they have in the past.
The team has some exciting prospects poised to reach the majors in the coming years. Infielder Alex Freeland is already arguably MLB ready, and signing an infielder like Bichette could wind up blocking him long-term. Star outfield prospects Zyhir Hope and Josue De Paula are further away from the majors but could debut later this year and are both consensus top-50 prospects in the sport. Even as the team’s projected outfield lacks much impact (with Teoscar Hernandez and Andy Pages set to take up regular roles alongside some combination of Tommy Edman, Alex Call, and Hyeseong Kim), it’s easy to see why the team might hesitate about signing Tucker to a massive contract.
All of those considerations still remain for the Dodgers, but that hasn’t stopped them from coming up more frequently in the rumor mill for players’ markets as the offseason has progressed. Tucker remains available on the market and has a relatively small number of suitors outside of L.A., with the Blue Jays and Mets being the other teams most frequently connected to him. Bichette’s market has kicked up in recent days with the Phillies, Red Sox, and Blue Jays among the teams involved on some level or another, while the Mets and Yankees are two of the few remaining realistic landing spots for Cody Bellinger.
The Dodgers have appeared to remain on the periphery of all three of those markets, and appear ready to pounce if any of them express willingness to sign a shorter-term deal at a high average annual value. Whether that will happen remains to be seen but the likelihood of such a deal increases as Spring Training approaches. The Phillies, for example, would need to do quite a bit of maneuvering to fit Bichette into the roster and budget plans. That figures to include trading Alec Bohm, which could be difficult to pull off late in the offseason once teams have mostly settled their rosters. Meanwhile, a team like the Red Sox or Yankees could take themselves out of the market for help on offense by swinging a trade for a bat like Isaac Paredes or Brendan Donovan.
If a star free agent finds themselves without much of a long-term market and needs to pivot towards a shorter deal, the Dodgers appear very well positioned to make a play. Edman’s positional flexibility would allow the Dodgers to accommodate a short-term addition to either their infield or outfield, with the super utility man getting regular reps on the grass if Bichette is brought in or handling the keystone if either Bellinger or Tucker joins the organization. What’s more, it’s hard to imagine a more attractive club to spend a year with than L.A. given the team’s star power and winning culture. Helping the Dodgers to a three-peat with a strong 2026 campaign would be the exact sort of profile booster that a star free agent like Tucker or Bichette would be hoping for on a pillow contract.
What do MLBTR readers think? Will the Dodgers swoop in and snag one of the remaining top bats in free agency, or will they head into 2026 with more or less the same roster they won the World Series with last year? Have your say in the poll below:
Will the Dodgers land a big free agent this winter?
-
No, they won't land any of them. 51% (3,595)
-
Yes, they'll land Kyle Tucker. 30% (2,116)
-
Yes, they'll land Bo Bichette. 12% (837)
-
Yes, they'll land Cody Bellinger 8% (551)
Total votes: 7,099

I mean, do they really need another big bat?
Yes
Does a Pooh poo in the woods?
Cows are almost cooing
Turtle doves are mooing
Which is why a Pooh is poohing
In the sun.
–Jefferson Airplane “The House at Pooneil Corners” 1968
@Enjoy-Not if Disney has anything to say about it.
It really does depend on what they’re hitting.
This article was formulated just to generate that exact question during a slow patch in the offseason.
“Article engineered to make people think and discuss topic”
Wow what a breakthrough
I like a poll that asks which of those top FAs will the Rockies sign, imagine the think and discuss.
@brew88
“Which big free agent will the Rockies sign?”
None of the above, discussion over and your poll was boring. Next topic
@brew Alex -Things that will never happen in MLB for $1000
Ken: Please state answers in the form of a question.
I think the outfield could be improved. They almost lost the World Series last season. Without any additions they will be a favorite to win World Series again.
I’d like to be good enough to almost lose a World Series every year.
They 100% need another as they have guys already starting to decline and that’s only gonna get worse. They were not exactly an offensive juggernaut in the playoffs.
How about a medium sized bat? Unfortunately not a choice in this poll.
I like big bats, I cannot lie.
TMI.
Juggy
“do they really need another big bat?”
Need? No. This is the best team in baseball as is
But, unlike many teams, winning the world series is their goal. And they are doing what they can too achieve that goal
I didn’t know a hall of famer could be an active player. they’ll probably add a bat
Well if we are going off his WAR he’s definitely a certain hall of famer at this point.
There’s no guarantee. Likely future hall of famer is more accurate .
I’m guessing it will be a 34″ Louisville Slugger, with a cork center.
Yes, they will add all three. Lots of holes in that lineup and Jays proved that last year. Can’t win championships with holes.
No. They will sign all four of them even though there’s only three of them can’t leave things to chance
@Brew88
True, need all four of them. I think the Dodgers need an all-star bench to go along with that team. Currently, it’s a bit of a clown show right now. Almost up there with the White Sox bench.
They will sign all 5 of them, they need more reinforcements in Triple A to compete for the minor league championship
I vote for the Big One.
They appear to be the favorites to win the NL as currently constructed. They have nothing to prove to anyone. I don’t see the upside from an ownership perspective.
The upside is making AL/NL central fans seethe to the point they demand tighter luxury taxes. Owners understand how to manipulate fan reactions
DO
” I don’t see the upside from an ownership perspective.”
Increased buzz around the team
Increased chance to win another World Series
Will Dodgers defer more money on another big contract to add another star player?
Yes.
Will someone complain specifically about the Dodgers deferring money, when other teams have deferred money in their free agent contracts this off-season?
Yes.
Im ok with some dodger defense but you cannot defend the dodgers when dodgers is literally in your name
Why not?
That’s like an Astros fan saying trash cans didnt change 2017 at all, or KC Chiefs fans saying referees aren’t biased, or OKC Thunder fans saying SGA doesnt have a special foul whistle
I know im spewing a lot of hate but I’m just trying to show what bias is, as a Seattle fan even I didn’t think Raleigh should’ve won MVP
So you can’t defend anything sad? Or Mariners? Or anyone who might be tormented or neglected?
Will you even be able to post on this site using these rules you’ve made?
Probably not.
Plus, I only used their logic against them. Just like I did to you. Is it really defending? Or just pointing out the truth of the argument presented?
No I don’t think pirates could defer billions of dollars even if they tried.
I doubt even Orioles, Royals, Diamondbacks could and they’ve been willing to spend
Woah there hold the horses I didn’t want anyone getting irritated about others in an MLBTR comment section
The definition of defending is: resisting an attack made on someone or something; protecting from harm or danger
You are right that you don’t have to be a dodgers fan to “point out facts” but at this point your argument seems to be resisting harm on the dodgers actions
Dang, I was about to say yes but you beat me to it
Who’s complaining? It’s standard operating procedure
Taking guesses at how much they’ll defer is a bit more exciting than guessing which big bad they’ll sign. Still leaves a bit of mystery to it all
Dropped,
Fair enough. I’m extremely curious to see who they are waiting for. When saw Friedman say that, I just put myself in wait and see mode.
Hopefully it’ll pan out. Maybe the target players is off the board. Maybe it’s a trade they have set up?
One thing I have stopped trying to do is anticipate what the front office is going to do, outside of the obvious. No one had Alex Call and Brock Stewart on their Dodgers trade deadline bingo card. But that’s what they did.
I do get all the frustration regarding the Ohtani deferrals. He wanted them. Any team that he signed with would have done them. But it’s the Dodgers, so I get it. Most of the time when it comes to my rebuttals to deferral jokes in just being fun snarky, not seriously defending the Dodgers.
The Dodgers are my team. They were when they were my own when I was a kid, they were during the terrible Fox and McCourt times, and they are under current ownership. I’m not blind, just thankful the team I root for has competent ownership who came in with a plan they executed.
Gifted series from blue jays. He didn’t even have to slide.
Do the Dodgers even need to had a big bat like a Bo or Tucker?
Not sure if they need either but they do need to upgrade somewhere and get younger. The lineup was very inconsistent in the postseason and really lacked the explosiveness. They looked old, as they are old. Time to get younger. You’re certainly not going to trade Betts or Freeman. Muncy is on a potential last year, and on a team friendly deal. The guy who really needs to get upgraded/traded is Teoscar Hernandez. He’s been in the bottom 3 percentile in OF range the last two seasons, and while he hit in 2024 to erase some people’s memories regarding the terrible defense he was very pedestrian at the plate in 2025, making him a complete liability. His contract will be as much of a challenge as his bad defense. Dodgers may need to pony up cash and/or lesser prospects.
“they do need to upgrade somewhere”
Dodger fans “we can’t keep winning world series on game 7’s, we NEED to upgrade “
Imagine if other team fans behaved this way?
Yankees fans were like this in the 90s-2000s.
At least on the 90s dynasty Yankees a good amount of their main guys like Jeter Pettite Posada Bernie Mariano etc were homegrown
The dodgers best homegrown player (Yamamoto doesnt count) I can think of is Will Smith, who is a top 3 catcher
They still paid those homegrown players a ton of money to stay, and they kept buying big name players around them. Giambi, ARod, Clemens, Wells; and then CC, Burnett, and Texeira in the later 2000s, etc. Their spending had been a reason why a lot of these newer competitive balance rules have come into form over the last 15 or so years.
Dodgers have had a lot of homegrown talent come in and out over the years as well. They just don’t stick around for one reason or another. That all said Kershaw was a career Dodger and just retired. Pages recently came up through their system and he’s turned into a pretty good CF.
Homegrown is such a silly concept. Nobody who uses it has any sensible idea what it means.
Championship teams don’t stay put with an aging team. If left alone the lineup gets worse with age, not better. No guarantees that the big 4 SPs are healthy for postseason again in 2026. Without the big 4 SPs in 2025 and an inconsistent lineup I could see the Dodgers losing to a team like the Phillies and obviously to the Blue Jays in WS. Get it?
Toyota, made in America
Dodgers had a lot of success from the farm early on in this run with guys like Kershaw, Seager, Bellinger, Urias, Pederson, Buehler, Smith etc. and reclamations like Justin Turner, Muncy and CT3. The development hasn’t been as good lately and why they’re spending so much now. In a perfect world they wouldn’t have to spend as much on free agents. Farm is supposedly much better now but most of those guys are young at A/AA, so still a long mountain to climb and plenty of time to get de-railed before MLB.
At one time the Dodgers were in real trouble as to which of the young stars they were going to sign to big contracts. But it all kind of worked itself out.
They let Seager go by bridging Trea to Lux at SS which was a big fail. Urias had domestic violence issues. Bellinger played himself to a DFA. Similarly Buehler was not quite the same after injury. Instead of having to sign one or two between these four young stars none were signed to big contracts.
MLB, excellent teams lose to mediocre teams all the time in baseball. There are no guarantees, which is why they play the games.
No one has the Diamondbacks going to the world series a few years ago, but they did. The Dodgers and other teamscan only maximize their odds, and then play the games.
Of course there are no guarantees. All you can do is upgrade and de-risk the model and hope it works out. The odds of big 4 SPs all being available again for postseason is probably not very high. Guys like Freeman and Betts are in decline mode. Muncy as well. Teo is aging too. Everyone is hoping for a bounce back but that may not materialize. Hope is not a good strategy. Friedman won’t stay put. Definitely an upgrade coming in the OF.
Do championships count more if more players are homegrown?
Yes, it counts 6 more, down from 7.3 last year if they’re homegrown.
Does the team have to draft those players as well?
MLB,
Teoscar was having an MVP type offensive start to the season before he got hurt.
Groin and leg injuries impacted him for the rest of season. He was stubborn and wouldn’t take days off, which limited his recovery. When Roberts forced him to take two days off in a row he came back strong at the plate.
He’ll never be a gold glove candidate in the outfield, but if he’s healthy, he’ll likely mash.
Regarding Teo: even when healthy he always is pretty streaky. He’ll get super hot and hit like 2000s Barry Bonds for a month or two and then he hits like 2023 Joey Gallo for another few months. At least as a Mariners fan he was frustrating to watch in 2023 outside of that one really hot month.
If we can get the hot streak down the stretch and playoffs, a mediocre regular season is acceptable.
All signs point to him giving up playing time to the youngsters in 2027. Maybe he’s traded? Depends how he looks this season and postseason.
On a small sample size. After a hot start he was bad for most of the season. His undisciplined bat is the worst of it. Between him and Pages that’s two bats in the lineup with really low quality ABs. Dodgers used to be a team known for the consistent high quality ABs up and down the lineup. Not so much in 2025 postseason. Blue Jays lineup looked like the high quality AB team.
You know his range in 2024 was equally as bad as in 2025 without these groin and leg injuries. He was hitting in 2024 so nobody cared to comment about the terrible defense.
Anything is possible but I doubt Teo gets back to 2024 production and likely closer to 2025 versus 2024.
That was pretty much Teo in 2025. A few memorable HRs in postseason and a hot start to the season but very uninspiring at the plate for most of the year.
The ABs are god awful too when he goes cold. Take strike one over the middle. Fouls off a clear ball strike 2. Any breaking pitch below the knees with 2 strikes he’s swinging. Absolutely no discipline. And we haven’t even talked about the glove. One of the worst OFs in baseball.
I’m not relying on hoping the team getting hot. I’d rather upgrade with a quality hitter that will give you better ABs and a better glove than Teo.
I think this year they’ll be a bit more forceful when asking him to take a day off here and there.
He wants to be in the lineup every day, and that affects his play when he wants to work through injuries and slumps. We’ll see how it goes.
I think the 110% tax is a pretty large hurdle, even for the free spending Dodgers. But who knows.. Mark Walter sure seems to like winning.
Dombrowski is meeting with Bichette, I doubt he leaves Philly. I am not a Philly fan.
I think Tucker and Bellinger are holding out for more than 5 years. In the latters case I suspect they are trying to get the Yankees to blink.
Phillies seem to have spent all of their money since they don’t have a catcher right now
Tucker or Bo would be strong fits on paper but Philly is probably done for the off-season except the realmuto situation
phillies are about $24 million below what they spent last year. the question for them is, do they want to go over $300 mill to sign Bichette, and then have very little left to add anything else, or are they going to free spend like the dodgers and mets.
Sadly, it’s going to be Harrison Badder and the only reason they haven’t signed him already is that he insanely wants three years but he’s not going to get from anyone. Dodgers will get him for one year and badly miscalculate the age of the line lineup, inevitable, declining production, and that quite literally might be the thing that keeps them from repeating. they needed a big thumper bat to offset guys who are soon to be riding off into the sunset slowly.
I’m sure they had discussions with Tucker where he was on Zoom with them for 45 seconds they offered three years. He laughed and clicked.” Leave meeting.
I’m not saying they needed to sign him for 10 to 12 years but it’s weird to sign Diaz then suddenly cheap out on a key position they need to fill in the lineup. I could be proven wrong, but I don’t think I will be and I don’t think they’re getting any of those guys at the top of the market on the three or deal.
Teo, Pages and edman for their OF right now? Doesn’t seem strong enough for the dodgers but I don’t think any of the big FA are fits there. Bellinger was released, Tucker is an Astro rival and dodgers have plenty of middle infielders so Bichette is out too.
Tucker is a really good fit though. I’m not sure how serious that rivalry is. Maybe they sign him? Same deal Bregman got with Boston last year?
How about a trade for Burleson from STL? Or does he have enough control they think he will still be around when they’re good?
Being an Astro rival will have zero to do with it.
None of the above.
Dodgers are over the Cohen Tax and need to get younger badly – their age nearly cost them a World Series, with Yoshi Yamamoto being the only reason Toronto didn’t win it all.
Nobody is trading for that Teoscar albatross – his bat is slowing down and his D remains awful.
Very likely what the current roster is will likely be what the Dodgers come into Cactus League with next month.
db
“Yoshi Yamamoto being the only reason Toronto didn’t win it all.”
Did you watch the world series?
Do you watch baseball?
No one player is ever the reason a team wins a game, let alone a series.
They land Bo and everyone cries about them buying a 3rd straight WS title. Except strangely Cubs are happy and content and remain quiet just this one time…
Bo will sign a 10 year contract with the Dodgers for $400M and half of it deferred until 2055
Just in the last couple days, after an entire offseason me telling everyone “he’s not going to LA…”, I am convinced the Dodgers are getting Tucker
This is where they get in, one of those three-year deals with opt outs.
The longer they’re out there, the more likely they are to land one. Bichette feels like a Dodger move.
I really do think Bichette or Tucker will take a three-year deal with opt outs so they can try again next season.
Happens
VPH
“The longer they’re out there, the more likely they are to land one.”
Yes
Because when they are no longer out there they have zero chance to land one
Kinda hard to criticize Mookie for a down year. They asked him to play SS for the first time in his professional career full time as a 32 year old. I’d say he delivered. That’s some crap you do in franchise mode on your PlayStation.
Plus he had some debilitating stomach bug for like a month.
Right?
He switched to SS, almost won a gold glove. Came into the season very sick and had lost a lot of weight. Once he was healthy he started hitting like Mookie Betts again.
But yeah, he’s obviously on the downswing.
Send him my way for a salary dump lol
The Dodgers are what they are because of Mookie. He was the OG.
They have flat out said this. Once they realized what they had with Mookie, they moved up their plans and went into win now mode.
Without Mookie Betts, no one would be complaining about the Dodgers right now.
How much bigger do they think they can go? The maximum length of an MLB bat is 42 inches. A big bat would be what, six feet? Tell hit the catcher.
I love the smell of conjecture in the morning.
I don’t expect a big name but they do need to replace Conforto. Maybe Bader or Austin Hays type of addition
Do it, get Tucker.
I voted None. As of today. The odds go up every day that goes by without other teams closing the deals.
Sure why not
Maybe so
I’m just waiting. They set their sights on someone around the winter meetings, and said they needed to be patient. So they are being patient.
Does it need to be one of these three? Nope.
While it’s near impossible to envision this happening on a team vying for a three-peat, i would absolutely love to see the Dodgers let their 5 touted OF prospects duke it out in spring training for a starting spot. I think the excitement and energy any of them (especially De Paula and Hope) could infuse into that lineup and clubhouse would be an absolute boon.
That would be something, De Paula and Hope are just 20 yrs old
Well, great players usually do hit the majors around that age.
The Dodgers have thier best prospects, all outfielders, coming up. No LT contracts for outfielders.
Screwing around, putting Mookie everywhere….all because a couple of rookie infielders couldn’t get it started….
Bo solves problems.
Harrison Bader and then be quiet.
And then Harrison Bader be injured half the season like he normally is during non-walk years.
I hoped to choose at least 3 big bats. LA would sign Tucker, Bellinger and Bichette for the same reason my dog licks himself…
Do the dodgers think they hit with 10 guys now? Sheesh! Another deferred contract in the making. At this rate, they will be paying great great great grandchildren with all these deferments. Bonilla Day is going to be Dodger Holiday soon enough.
PF
“At this rate, they will be paying great great great grandchildren with all these deferments”
Tell me you know nothing about deferrals without telling me
First, the deferrals don’t start at the end of the last defferal. Like, they don’t pay all of Betts’ deferrals, then pay Freeman’s, then Ohtani’s, then…
Most of these deferrals are to be paid roughly 10 years from now. I don’t know how your family works, but in most, that’s too young for grandchildren, let alone great grandchildren.
You probably get deferred payments. Do you get paid daily? If not, you get deferred payments. You probably get paid a week or more later than the work you are getting paid for
Also, do you get a pension from your company? Probably not, but if you do, what’s that but a deferred payment.
Did you pay cash upfront for your house? Car? Groceries? If not, those are deferred payments. There’s nothing especially strange or hilarious about them
Oh, I got you got triggered. FYI, I never once said they pay deferred money once one ends and another begins as you ASSUMED. Don’t ever talk down on me like I have no clue what deferred money means and translated. Bonilla Day is always a joke to any baseball enthusiast because of the deferred money went beyond their (25 years) playing days.
Second of all, treating humans like a car or house as a loan, is very ludicrous. One nor the other should ever be compared to each other. That is like finding similarities to apples to bananas. This Monopoly money that Dodgers and one point Mets, to defer money for years beyond a players service of time, is vey scandalizing. Since sho much money is deferred, shouldn’t their retirement plans be void until deferred money is paid off completely? Seriously, I think deferred money is bad for baseball and I can see they change that in the next CBA.
Having the deferred money helps keep teams under the luxury taxes threshold. Dodgers are at the highest point of the luxury tax threshold and if the Dodgers add any further contracts, it would cause penalties and potentially disrupt the CBA. Dodgers are running in the grey area that will have dire consequences if those policies change. It could bankrupt a club with their irresponsible spending. Deferred money is bad business
PF
“, I never once said they pay deferred money once one ends and another begins”
No. But I understand how time works.
But I guess I misunderstood you. What did you mean?
“Bonilla Day is always a joke to any baseball enthusiast because of the deferred money went beyond their (25 years) playing days.”
As a baseball enthusiast and person who understands finance, I don’t see anything funny about Bobby Bonilla Day. Or Brett Saberhagen Day. Or Bruce Sutter Day…
“That is like finding similarities to apples to bananas”
You mean two fruits? Yes very hard to find similarities.
“treating humans like a car or house as a loan, is very ludicrous. ”
Ok. What do you think about treating payments like, I dunno, payments?
“Having the deferred money helps keep teams under the luxury taxes threshold. ”
Not really. The Dodgers pay Ohtani $2 million a year and place $44 million a year into an interest bearing account to save the money until they pay the deferred payments. That’s $46 million a year the put towards Ohtani. And $46 million goes towards the CBT.
“if the Dodgers add any further contracts, it would cause penalties and potentially disrupt the CBA”
Why would that happen?
@PF No matter what system is in place teams will always find ways to get around it. In the NFL they’re constantly restructuring contracts to fit within the salary cap. In the current luxury tax system in baseball teams defer money. No matter what the new CBA says, teams will be treading within the gray area you speak of.
Bellinger reunion!
There is a HUGE difference between the headline and the poll questions. Nick Deeds wrote the article so not making any sense is par for the course.
The way these writers can predict where people go, I fully expect Bellinger, Tucker and Bichette to be Dodgers this season.