All around the baseball world, the offseason started with a great deal of hype for the two top talents coming over from Japan to play in MLB: slugger Munetaka Murakami and starter Tatsuya Imai. Both players seemed likely to follow in the footsteps of other recent stars to make the jump from NPB to the majors, including Yoshinobu Yamamoto and Seiya Suzuki, and be among the most coveted free agents on the market. Things did not pan out that way, however, as both players found surprisingly soft markets and wound up taking short-term deals with the hope of returning to the open market after establishing themselves as quality big leaguers.
As they prepare for their respective rookie seasons, Murakami as a member of the White Sox and Imai with the Astros, who is better positioned to do just that? When looking at the contracts the pair got, it’s easy to argue that Imai’s more lucrative deal indicates a greater level of confidence in his ability to succeed. He landed a three-year, $54MM contract with Houston back in January that provides him the opportunity to opt out after either the 2026 or ’27 season. That’s an extra year and $20MM relative to Murakami’s deal in Chicago, not to mention that Murakami doesn’t have an opt-out clause in his deal.
It’s easy to see why teams would’ve had a bit more confidence in Imai than Murakami. Murakami comes with multiple unique questions, including whether his defense will hold up in the majors at either first or third base and whether there’s room for improvement on his extremely low contact rates from his time overseas. Imai doesn’t really come with comparable concerns; his mid-90s velocity and four-pitch mix are strong bets to play in the majors in terms of floor, leaving the Astros less likely to come up completely empty on their investment than the White Sox.
What Murakami lacks in terms of floor, however, it can be argued that he makes up for with exceptional upside. Murakami’s contact rates might be among the lowest in the majors if translated over, but players like Shohei Ohtani, Aaron Judge, Kyle Schwarber, and Nick Kurtz are among the most productive hitters in the entire sport despite high strikeout rates and a proclivity for racking up whiffs. It’s easy to see why Murakami’s sensational exit velocities could allow him to compare to those elite sluggers, particularly given that he only just celebrated his 26th birthday.
It’s fair to wonder if Imai has that sort of elite upside to offer. While his velocity is impressive, scouts have suggested that his fastball lacks the movement necessary to be a high-end pitch. That in conjunction with the control issues he’s flashed at various points in his MLB career might cap his ceiling at something closer to the middle of a big league rotation. Murakami, by contrast, could find himself battling with the likes of Judge and Cal Raleigh at the top of the home run leaderboards if he manages to make enough contact to be productive and continues to grow as a player.
If Murakami breaks out the way some both in Japan and the United States have believed he’s capable of doing, it’s hard to imagine Imai being able to hold a candle to that production no matter how close to his own ceiling he gets. With that said, it could be difficult for either to make much noise in Rookie of the Year conversations. The AL figures to feature a stacked class including players like Kevin McGonigle, Samuel Basallo, Dylan Beavers, Trey Yesavage, and Carter Jensen. Even if Murakami or Imai outproduces those players, their status as foreign professionals already in their mid-20s could still hurt them in Rookie of the Year voting, especially against younger players like McGonigle and Basallo.
How to MLBTR readers view the pair headed into their rookie seasons? Who will have the more productive year? Will either one manage to force themselves into conversations for the AL Rookie of the Year award? Have your say in the polls below:
Who will have the better 2026 season?
-
Tatsuya Imai 51% (557)
-
Munetaka Murakami 49% (538)
Total votes: 1,095
Will Murakami and/or Imai receive Rookie of the Year votes?
-
Both will receive Rookie of the Year votes. 57% (641)
-
Neither will receive Rookie of the Year votes. 17% (193)
-
Only Imai will receive Rookie of the Year votes. 16% (176)
-
Only Murakami will receive Rookie of the Year votes. 10% (116)
Total votes: 1,126

Why on Earth was Okamoto not included here? He might end up being the best of the three!
That’s tomorrow. We’re doing face-off polls now.
Like which two of the F-grade offseason teams had the better offseason.
Need articles on which player had the better off season, I’d like to hear about t tropical vacations and summer romances
“F-grade offseason teams”
Not “player”.
From all the reports Okamoto seems to have the least questions due to his ability with the bat and glove. These two guys ended up being questions marks.
I picked Okamoto.
Domo Okamoto.
Underrated reply.
Imai wilo hold his own, Mooney will be batting late in the lineup or released.
ChiSox – Lucy’s boss will be in the lineup?
Again Fever Pitch Guy shows why he is a Baseball Reference first ballot HOF.Mr Mooney will not be in the lineup he will be in his usual position by the employee punch clock.
Somebody trying to coin a nickname?
Thats soo fetch!
Chet, stop trying to make fetch happen!
They are both going to be awful. Haven’t liked what I’ve seen from either. Overhyped and overpaid, wouldn’t be surprised if they get released before the season ends
Trolling noted
I’m going to release Imai in both of my 10 teamers based on your input here. Not a big buyer of the asian persuasion either
Just to note… last year Chandler Simpson got a vote for RoY.
Unless both spend most of the time on the DL or are so bad they just get benched, pretty much a certain bet both will get at least one vote.
Exactly, I think both will get votes, but neither will win.
If one asks which of the two will get more votes, I would respond Imai.
Batting a hair under .300 and stealing over 40 bases your rookie year should get you at least one vote.
of course Simpson did. 40 SB and nearly 300 avg will do that.
but in reality, most teams prime rookies get a vote from local riders
Do not understand why you feel Okamoto is disqualified?
Kazuchika Okada
La Parka
The Okada vs Takeshita poll comes out next week
We are seeing Japanese and Korean players adapt well to MLB. If this latest crop all have success I wouldn’t be shocked to see teams start spending more money scouting the Japanese and Korean leagues.
okamoto
(Yawn) Next question! 🤣
Seems a bit weird to compare a power hitting 1B and a pitcher
Munetaka Murakami
23-29 HRs
75-90 RBI
11 SB
.265 BA
.325OBP
Tatsuya Imai
12-6 W/L
3.49ERA
3.73FIP
Decent rookie seasons for both of them.
I had it as:
Yesavage (+370)
Imai (+850)
Murakami (+600)
Okamoto (+600)
and it seems as though Vegas has it nearly the same.
Its the next tier that is interesting:
Jensen (+600)
McGonigle (+900)
Basallo (+1000)
Beavers (+1300)
De Lauter (+2000)
Bazzana (+2200)
Williams (+4500)
I like De Lauter and Bazzana in this group.
I also like Joe Rock in Tampa and would put him high on the list of dark horse candidates along with Gabriel Gonzalez in Minnesota. Daniel Espino is a name to look out for.
Could Espino land a starting job by May and run with it? Absurd K rates before his injury, major shoulder surgery but hitting 98 in spring. Espino was once one of the best pitching prospects in all of baseball.
Gabriel Gonzalez WTH? Did he arrive from the UFC?