![]() |
|
|
| |
« Recently On Our Network | Main | MLBTR Demographic Survey »
The big story in baseball today, though not a trade rumor, is that manager Joe Torre could be fired if the Red Sox complete a sweep of the Yankees this weekend.
One can question some of Torre's behavior through the year, as with most managers. But to fire him in April is just silly and reactive. Typical theatrics. The Yankees' 5.94 starter ERA is the second worst in the league. Torre didn't cause this. Torre didn't sign Kei Igawa, and he probably didn't decide to give Chase Wright two starts instead of Phil Hughes. He didn't cause the injury to Mike Mussina, and it's not his fault the Yanks were left with Carl Pavano as the Opening Day starter.
The Kei Igawa contract was pretty dumb from the start, and Phil Hughes should've broken camp with the team. I would've given him a taste of the bigs last September. But as for Mussina and Wang having three starts between them instead of eight or nine, that's just bad luck. True, the Yankees didn't have a ton of starting pitching depth to cover it. The Angels and A's did have that kind of depth, and it served them well so far. That, again, is on Brian Cashman.
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553e976478833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Torre Could Be Fired:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Ive heard torre might be fired also. The weird part is, that there might actually be a situation where on sunday night this guy is managing to literally save his job? I cant see how you can fire a guy in april after 1 specific series. I uynderstand it hasnt just been 1 series, but it seems a little weird to give a guy a 1 series ultimatum. Like if u get swept in this individual series your gone. I dont think hes gone yet. I would give him another month to try to turn things around
Posted by: nrmax88 | April 28, 2007 at 01:08 PM
Its also interesting that Cashman has kind of become a scapegoat, because Yankee fans all over were talking about whata great job he had done in getting rid of big contracts, but honestly if i was a yankee fan right now id be wishing RJ was back here. Hell, even Jaret Wright is better then Chase Wright or Karstens or Igawa and those bums
Posted by: nrmax88 | April 28, 2007 at 01:13 PM
The Kei Igawa signing was impulsive and desperate. Not to mention that it was flat out stupid. If they were going to waste money, they should have signed Ted Lilly. At least he would have been solid.
Posted by: moebarguy | April 28, 2007 at 01:28 PM
What a joke this is. As a Sox fan, nothing would make me happier than the Yankees firing Torre.
As I wrote on my blog this morning, once their pitching is somewhere near average-- which will happen-- the Yankees will be a top AL team for the millionth year in a row under Torre. Or, the Boss can hit the panic button, and make it that much more likely that the wheels will come off.
It'd ease my cognative dissonance, too, a bit, if the Yankees could fire Torre, and maybe unload Jeter and Rivera and Tony Pena somehow, so I could hate the Yankees without loving so many of their players and coaches.
Posted by: Elvis Elvisberg | April 28, 2007 at 01:40 PM
The biggest knock against Torre is his awful bullpen management, but really, what can you do with the puss they are trotting out there to start games?
Posted by: xxxJamesxxx | April 28, 2007 at 02:02 PM
First off I think Torre is safe until memorial day - perhaps more if he can win 4-5 in a row ( seems like the call for Manuels head in Philly have died down awfully quick after a mini win streak). Second - who would replace him mid season? Bowa - too rough and i don't think he wants it. Pena - i would say odds on favorite. Donnie Baseball - not enough time as bench coach. Girardi - would kill mattingly and staff if they brought him in as heir apparent - could cause some discontent. Personally I would go for Bobby V but Steinbrenner still runs the team so maybe go the way of the tigers and bring back an oldie but a goodie - Gene Michael ( only cuz Billy Martin is dead )
Posted by: touchmymonkey | April 28, 2007 at 02:06 PM
All I know is this: Joe Torre is a much better man than me or anyone I know, because he's put up with all this bullshit for so long and he's remained one of the classiest individuals the game as to offer.
I know that if I was him, I would quit now. Actually, I probably would have quit a long time ago given how he's been treated. Why does he need this? He's won his battles, he's maintained his reputation of class and respect.
Basically Joe, this is the message: I hear the islands are nice. Don't wait for the Boss to hand you youre walking papers. Get out now.
Posted by: JakeOD21 | April 28, 2007 at 02:18 PM
ok let's clear some things up.
1) None of this falls on Cashman. Igawa was a marketing signing. It was a response to Matsuzaka that was made for PR reasons. Did they hope he'd be a decent #5 starter? Sure. But we're missing the context of that signing here. Humberto Sanchez was supposed to be the 7th/8th inning stopgap if things went sour. He was damaged goods. Can't blame that on Cashman. That's a medical evaluation problem.
2) Phillip Hughes should NOT have been called up in September or to start the season. He isn't ready and when pitchers aren't ready and have all this hype, they tend to do things like overpitch. He's their future. You don't risk that on a 20 year old kid who could use some more time to get a feel for AAA.
3) Torre can't work a bullpen. Like Olney reported in his column, he's been awful at that. That's why Torre is taking some heat right now. And that's exactly as it should be.
Posted by: finite24 | April 28, 2007 at 02:41 PM
It is hard to manage any bullpen when your starter aren't getting out of the 5th.
Posted by: Ripwa | April 28, 2007 at 03:38 PM
It really isn't anyone's fault - $200 million just doesn't buy as much as it used to.
Posted by: Iron Nat | April 28, 2007 at 04:14 PM
finite24 - how is it that none of the yankees current woes fall on Cashman? You say Igawa was a marketing move - isn't it Cashmans job to make baseball moves not marketing moves? Its been written many many times how Steinbrenner is doing the hands off thing and it is Cashmans team. So who made the Igawa signing?
When the Snachez trade went down all the initial press releases stated that he was a hot trade property last year until he hurt his elbow - Cashman missed something that the AP wire picked up? He took a gamble and it didn't pay off ( yet)- was not a bad medical evaluation - just a calculated gamble. You say Hughes should not have been brought up - whose decision was that? Torre gets to pick who comes up from the minors? Again - Cashman has the final decision on hughes ( with lots of input from others). Is the current state of the Yanks all Cashmans fault? not even close but to say he is totally faultless does not ring true either
Posted by: touchmymonkey | April 28, 2007 at 04:47 PM
touchmymonkey-
As much as I hate to think of it this way, baseball is a business. The Yankees are a franchise that is competing with other teams for marketing opportunities in Japan. In the long run, signing Igawa was an investment that will pay for itself. There's more to it then what occurs on the field, despite what we as fans want to believe.
On Sanchez, teams don't just go taking gamble's without having a strong medical opinion in favor of that decision. Was Cashman aware that he could be hurt? Sure. But someone on their medical staff had to be of the opinion he'd more than likely be ok.
The problem with Torre is he's having these guys warm up and come in to pitch to a hitter or two. It's one thing to play matchups. But when five of your relief pitchers are already on pace for 85+ IP, that's overuse.
Posted by: finite24 | April 28, 2007 at 05:12 PM
I know its a business but I just can't buy Igawa being a marketing move - Yankees are already immersed in japanese BB since they have Matsui. And you know what... if it was a marketing move by Cashman its still a crap move and thus can accept some of the blame for yankees current status. All I am saying is when things go bad the GM cannot simply get a 100% pass. May not be the biggest factor but is somewhat of a factor.
Posted by: touchmymonkey | April 28, 2007 at 05:25 PM
it's impossible for a fan to calculate the value of a signing like Igawa from that perspective. If Forbes can't do it, what good are we. The Yanks franchise is worth over $2.4 billion dollars right now, after being worth only $600 million in ten years ago. They've been doing something right since then, and it has a lot to do with their off the field operations with the Yes network and offshore marketing.
Posted by: finite24 | April 28, 2007 at 05:50 PM
I am all for keeping Hughes's pitch counts down. But he could have been helping the Yanks all month, and brought into some low pressure situations last September. He's 20 but he's not going to start crying on the mound if he gives up some runs. Pitchers don't develop like hitters. Hughes is mostly there already.
Posted by: RotoAuthority | April 28, 2007 at 06:25 PM
I can see that. It just scares the crap out of me using him this early. Yankees have a way of making every situation high pressure. I'd rather err on the side of caution, but that's just me.
Posted by: finite24 | April 28, 2007 at 07:04 PM
ok - let me start over, my apologies if i was not clear. Finite... you posted that none of this falls on cashman. I disagree. You cited the igawa signing as marketing thus out of cashmans realm - you brought it up as though it were a bad signing by the marketing. I disagree since all moves are cashmans be it based on marketing value or baseball value. You think cashman was ill advised as to the medical soundness of sanchez thus not his fault. My way of seeing things is that he is the one who decides what opinions to give weight to thus ultimately bears the responsibility of the gamble not paying off for 07. Thats it - thats all i am saying. Has nothing to do whether cashman is good or not or if as a fan i can understand the complexities of international signings or not. Plain and simple - you think Cashman has totally clean hands of this mess ( which may not be that big a mess given due time) and i dispute your examples and the degree of cashmans responsibility
Posted by: touchmymonkey | April 28, 2007 at 07:04 PM
Baseball revenue outside the USA goes directly to MLB, not the Yankees.
There is no marketing signing, Igawa was a reaction to Matsuzaka.
Posted by: quintjs | April 28, 2007 at 07:42 PM
I agree quintjs. Time will tell whether it was a good signing but looks soso at best after a very brief glimpse
Posted by: touchmymonkey | April 28, 2007 at 07:52 PM
Reaction PR move? WTF?
Why do the Yankees need a reaction PR move for a Japanese pitcher? they have the most famous Japanese slugger on their team for over 3 years already. that's just ridiculas spectulation.
Were the other options better bets? woudl you like the Yankees to give Zito 8+ years and/or over 20M a year after luxury tax? would you like Jason Schidmt? who's also on the DL and was throwing in the mid to low 80s his last couple times out? RJ also started the season on the DL and was bombed in his first start, that would REALLY help the Yankees wouldn't it, as well as Jaret Wright, who's also on the DL again. oh and his last start before the DL he lsted 2.1 innings using 90 pitches. that would REALLY help the Yankees?
Ted Lilly and Randy Wolf was probably the only other two none crap (so the Yanks shoulda signed Jeff Weaver for 8M?) none geezard out there (Wells, Glavine , Maddux, Williams anyone), Wolf signed a home town deal intentionally so there's little to do about that. while Lilly didn't want to come back to the Yanks anyway, and whats more, people need to realize that he also barely averaged past 5 innigns last year and he's also a guy that comes with all sorts of injuries, how is he any less likely to pull something? or go less than 5? or walk the park? (bb/9 over 4 last year)
Kei Igawa's career stats matchs favorablly with Nomo and Matsuzaka, in fact he has by far the best walk rate amoung the 3, people are just overwhelmed by the Matsuzaka hype and somehow sees him as the anti Matsuzaka or somehing and not bothering to even look up what he's done in Japan. or hell even watch his starts other than on SC after he bombs one of his 4 starts. he has a fastball that sits comfortablly in the low 90s (above average for LHP SPs) and a plus curve with a plus change, it's hard to think that a guy with a 2.5 ish career NPB walk/9 rate (Matsuzaka is 3.2ish while Nomo was wild thing 5+ in the NPB) would forget how to throw strikes forever in the States.
He clearly hasn't gotten his grove down yet (Today was pretty good though, but still wild on a few occasion) but it's ridiculas how people jump to conclusion that are simply not there.
Posted by: Yu Hsing Chen | April 28, 2007 at 08:09 PM
Igawa wasn't plan A, B or C for the Yankees at the start of last off season, people didn't know who he was, scouts did but it wasn't as if he was a lock to even be posted (see Matsuzaka)
He is fine, but isn't Matsuzaka.
If Igawa can throw his curve for strikes, he should win, when he doesn't he loses. Thats it.
It isn't exactly what you want from a guy like that. I haven't watched these games, but you get the impression he cannot stop teams from scoring without his best stuff.
David Wright did question if he had Major league stuff.
The better options was probably Wang, Mussina, Pettitte, Matsuzaka and Johnson - that was probably plan A.
You walk Yu Hsing that Igawa wasn't the poor mans choice, he really was when comparing Japanese pitchers, and the Yankees gave him a 5yr deal, Ted Lilly might have been a better way of going. You can talk about avg. innings for sure, but Igawa isn't getting close to 200 this year either.
Posted by: quintjs | April 28, 2007 at 11:07 PM
Quintis...
please don't come out like an asshole when you don't particularly know what you are talking about. I hate when people try to slam other people as if they are the know all end all and they aren't even correct.
http://www.reuters.com/news/video/videoStory?videoId=5433
Posted by: finite24 | April 28, 2007 at 11:32 PM
Getting Japanese fans interested in the Yankee brand. That's not PR? Not on the same level as Matsui. Sure. But Igawa got hyped, the Japanese media were following him closely all throughout spring training. That's an investment in the Yankee brand.
"Short of Matsui falling completely on his face, the Yankees stand to make a handsome return on their $21 million investment, if early souvenir and ticket sales to Japanese tour groups are any indication. Estimates conclude that Japanese interest in Matsui could generate 500 million sorely needed dollars for the New York economy, about five times what Ichiro did for Seattle." - Time Magazine
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:Y-mBfKpCWVIJ:www.time.com/time/asia/2003/heroes/hideki_matsui.html+yankees+asia&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us
$500 million dollars. Pretty sizeable return on that investment, wouldn't you say?
Posted by: finite24 | April 28, 2007 at 11:40 PM
I belive the Igawa signing was 90% intended to get a somewhat decent 5th starter with a little upside at a decent price. Luxury tax figured in they're paying him less than say Miguel Batista, and he's still preferable to him. The fact that he's a Japanese is a bonus.
I didn't like the RJ trade. I wish we had a pitcher just like him, but not necessarily him, because he clearly was not right for NY. Vizcaino is ok but a bit overrated, and the prospects they got were mediocre. I was never in favor of that trade.
In any case, like others said, if Wang and Mussina never got hurt, this wouldn't happen. It's not just two starters - it's the cascading effect on the bullpen. Come mid-May the Yankees will be fine.
Posted by: bobo | April 29, 2007 at 03:37 AM
Its actually quintjs, but that couldn't matter the slightest.
That video mentioned nothing on my point, finite24, YOU need to do your research.
Barely any media organization has got international baseball revenue correct, they don't understand it.
I suggest you read this article
http://www.eagletribune.com/pusports/local_story_017120436?page=0
Of particular interest is the quote
"I'm not intentionally downplaying the economic benefit, but this is what hasn't been clear to the public," he said. "The reality is that all sponsorships, advertising deals and conducting revenue-generated deals for the Red Sox are exclusively limited to Fenway Park. Again, there is not a big financial benefit associated with this guy."
The problem facing Boston is that outside of the advertising and sponsorship deals cut to generate revenue inside the Sox's home park and within the six New England states (except Yankees-controlled Fairfield County in Connecticut), Major League Baseball controls the Red Sox "mark."
Posted by: quintjs | April 29, 2007 at 04:33 AM
A Marketing signing that generates little to no additiional income?
Marketing No, PR maybe, there was a move to sell this guy in some corners as someone better than Matsuzaka (strike out crowns in japan) at half the price.
What we have seen over the first month is a guy pretty much no better than any of the 5kids the Yankees have in AAA.
Todays game would have to be the turning of a corner to make that contract look good.46million for 5years? Phil Hughes could give me 5years service for 15million, and I think I know who has the better long term potential. Kartstens, Sanchez, Wright..
Igawa hasn't been any different in the month of April than any of them.
And for those who couldn't be stuffed reading the above article, Mr. Kennedy is the Red Sox' Senior Vice President of Marketing and Sales. I think he knows what he is talking about.
Posted by: quintjs | April 29, 2007 at 04:39 AM
I think the RJ deal was a decent one for both teams. The Yankees got rid of his 16MM + luxury tax salary and got Vizcaino, a decent reliever at the time, in return for a pitcher who was going to spend likely a month on the DL, although he came back a bit sooner.
Time will grade the deal differently and it can really go either way right now, but it wasn't a bad trade, especially considering RJ had asked to be traded for personal reasons.
If the NYY used the savings on the RJ trade to acquire the "right" pitcher, this would have looked like a great move. Luckily for the NYY they didn't use the money on the "wrong" pitchers like Schmidt or Weaver.
Posted by: tmar | April 29, 2007 at 11:40 AM
Marketing doesn't just encompass selling tickets and team jerseys, hats, etc. Sure, tourists from Japan are now more likely to come to a Yankee game, and that tourism in combination with the new stadium and investments in the area is part of the Yankees effort to revive the Bronx. But marketing efforts extend far beyond sales. This is about making a marketing investment to lower the cost of future operations.
This is like advertising for a beer company like Bud. Do you really think they need all that advertising to sell their product? Do you really think there aren't decreasing marginal returns to scale on that investment? But they still do it. Why? It's called market proliferation. It increases the cost for their competitors. As the firm with deep pockets, they are pricing their competition out of the market.
The Yankees, like Bud, are also brand. This is precisely what the Yankees and Red Sox are trying to do. They are investing in baseball in Asia, as other teams have done before in Latin America. Each signing offers a significant return on investment and will lower the cost of future signings while also increasing the cost for their competition. They are building the brand as a status symbol in the Asian market. This is basic marketing strategy. It's not all about immediate returns. It's an investment in the future. Most people overlook market as a way to decrease costs, and only see it as a cost center. That's a costly assumption.
Posted by: finite24 | April 29, 2007 at 12:38 PM
I know none of you were really interested in any of that. But I spent a lot of money in part to take an expensive sports marketing course, and i figured I'd put it to good use.
Never said they didn't think he wouldn't be a decent 5th starter or that getting him for $4.5 mil per year wouldn't help with the luxury tax. But this and every Asian signing is about much more than that.
Posted by: finite24 | April 29, 2007 at 12:42 PM
Most people overlook marketing**
Posted by: finite24 | April 29, 2007 at 12:43 PM
very true finite, i would also add that having a presence overseas makes it more likely overseas players would want to play for your team, and make FA signings more likely.
Everyone thought Matsuzaka wanted to play for the Yankees because he mentioned them once in a press conference, of course in reality they were the only team he knew anything about.
But I am sure when he first learned who won the bid, he would have been more happy if it was the Yankees than the Red Sox, for that reason, he knew something about them.
Posted by: quintjs | April 29, 2007 at 06:54 PM