![]() |
|
|
| |
« A-Rod Deal Looks Close | Main | Frank Wren Chat At MLB.com »
UPDATE, 11-15-07: A reporter from WBZ TV out of Boston is saying Lowell has a four-year offer from the Yankees in the $56-60MM range.
UPDATE, 11-14-07: Bernie Miklasz of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch kills the Lowell-Cardinals rumor.
FROM 11-13-07:
A new twist! Dan Graziano reports that an Alex Rodriguez signing wouldn't stop the Yankees from pursuing Mike Lowell. They'd like Lowell to play first base for them. A big part of it would be to take Lowell away from the Red Sox, it appears. Of course the Red Sox would get the Yankees' 28th overall pick next June as a consolation prize.
Graziano admits signing Lowell to switch positions would be tough, as teams like the Angels and Dodgers will be after him. According to a Boston television station, Lowell has already received offers from the Braves, Angels, Cardinals, and Yankees. Each is supposedly a four-year offer between $55-60MM. Color me skeptical of that particular rumor, but you never know.
Anyway, the Yankees dropping $50MM+ on Lowell just to thwart the Red Sox seems kind of irresponsible to me. Here's what they'd have:
C - Jorge Posada - $13.1MM
1B - Mike Lowell - $14MM
2B - Robinson Cano - $0.5MM
SS - Derek Jeter - $20MM
3B - Alex Rodriguez - $28MM
LF - Hideki Matsui - $13MM/Johnny Damon - $13MM
CF - Melky Cabrera - $0.5MM
RF - Bobby Abreu - $16MM
DH - Jason Giambi - $21MM
That's a $139MM starting lineup, and one of those guys would be on the bench. I imagine a Lowell signing would compel Brian Cashman to shop someone.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534a5a796970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yanks Want Lowell For First Base:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
If they're looking to shed salary, they really only have 3 options... Deal Matsui, Abreu, or Damon. Nobody would touch Giambi with a 10 foot pole, Jeter is the golden child, Posada, Lowell, A-Rod, and Rivera can't be since they just signed (hypothetically).
I really hope nobody does the Skanks any favors.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | November 14, 2007 at 09:02 PM
More than half of the Yankees lineup is a bought lineup. It wold just make it worse if they get Mike Lowell.
Posted by: kevybo1 | November 14, 2007 at 09:04 PM
Oh give me a break… And they wonder why most educated baseball fans despise the team…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | November 14, 2007 at 09:05 PM
Lowell sucks....i dont see why yankees haters wouldnt be happy abt this.
im a mets fan. if the yankees hadnt overpaid for so many players, beltran would be in the bronx.
luckily for me, they sign dudes like lowell.
Posted by: bsox21 | November 14, 2007 at 09:09 PM
It's called raising the price for Boston. Making sure they have to give the guy a Fourth Year. That's all.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | November 14, 2007 at 09:10 PM
GOD! i hate this friggen team.
Posted by: 04Forever | November 14, 2007 at 09:10 PM
I believe it is a bluff, but i would love the Yanks to sign him. Boston gets a 1st rounder! There are many 3rd base options:
Miggy C
Miggy T
Blalock
Chavez
Crede
etc
Posted by: johnbuckformvp | November 14, 2007 at 09:14 PM
I would have agreed with you i past years venom but i think Cashman finally lost his mind. He just doesnt know how to operate a baseball team anymore (if you ask me, he never knew how to). The Yankees biggest need of the offseason still remains: a new gm.
Posted by: themfightnwords | November 14, 2007 at 09:16 PM
"More than half of the Yankees lineup is a bought lineup. It wold just make it worse if they get Mike Lowell."
That's nothing unique in the AL East, friend.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 09:17 PM
im going to have to agree with not joe morgan on this one, as a sox fan even i have to agree with that. i dont think anything is wrong with it, if you got it flaunt it i would have to say in this case, esp as a sox team needing to compete with a machine like the yankees.
Posted by: 04Forever | November 14, 2007 at 09:20 PM
No way the Braves offered him any deal with Chipper at 3rd and Tex at 1st....
Posted by: SoleMaverick | November 14, 2007 at 09:20 PM
What's the salary limit this year before the penalties? Also, anyone know what rate they Yankees will have to pay for their "overage"?
Posted by: tmar | November 14, 2007 at 09:21 PM
I agree about the Braves. Lowell would not be a fit anywhere on the team.
Posted by: cashew | November 14, 2007 at 09:22 PM
Lowell or Jones could move to 2B? Trade Johnson and something else for pitching help?
Yeah the Braves is pretty BS. Cardinals? That would be funny.
Posted by: TrueCubsFan | November 14, 2007 at 09:24 PM
Sox dont get enough credit for sucess with the farm system. Next years lineup includes a homegrown 2b, 1b, C, CF, and possibly 3b/ss if they use Lowrie. Also Ortiz was picked up and signed for nothing.
Posted by: themfightnwords | November 14, 2007 at 09:24 PM
"im going to have to agree with not joe morgan on this one, as a sox fan even i have to agree with that. i dont think anything is wrong with it, if you got it flaunt it i would have to say in this case, esp as a sox team needing to compete with a machine like the yankees."
And there my friends, is the problem in MLB. Might as well fold the other 20 or so teams and just have it an all NY, BOS, CHW, CHC, LAD, ANA, NYM, etc game. Would be much more fun watching 6-10 mega-teams beat the crap out of eachother constantly than to have the talent spread over 30 teams and being forced to watch the Pit’s and Wash’s of the world try to act like real major league clubs...
Posted by: darkstar1661 | November 14, 2007 at 09:30 PM
"That's nothing unique in the AL East, friend."
Contrary to popular belief Not Joe Morgan, there are 3 other teams in the AL East and none of them have bought their lineups. The Jays do not have one fielding regular that can be considered "bought". The only "major" FAs to come aboard were Burnett and Thomas (and Ryan who didn't pitch last year).
It bothers me to no end when people discuss the AL East like there are only 2 teams in it.
Posted by: 92-93 | November 14, 2007 at 09:31 PM
bsox21- if youre a met fan why are you bsox21. Oh, yeah youre just like every other met fan who jumps on the sox bandwagon after the mets are out of it. Also, of Beltrans three years in NY, hes really only had one great year. Year one, he was basically bernie williams. Year two, he was great but last year, when he wasnt hurt he was pretty inconsistent...youre not quite gettin what you pay for with him
Posted by: nph248 | November 14, 2007 at 09:31 PM
What about trading Bobby Abreu to the Brewers? What would it take to get it done?
Posted by: Lidocaine | November 14, 2007 at 09:36 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=jp-newcba102506&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
To answer my own question the luxury tax level for 2008 is 155MM and the Yankees would pay the multiple offender rate of 40%.
Posted by: tmar | November 14, 2007 at 09:37 PM
nothing, abreu is certain to stay, if any fielder is going its going to be melky i think
Posted by: 04Forever | November 14, 2007 at 09:37 PM
wasnt there a rumor that the brews were shopping Ben Sheets and the yankees were interested?
Abreu and Ian Kennedy?
Posted by: tyler | November 14, 2007 at 09:38 PM
I have to question the Boston TV's sources credibility. They could have a source, sure, but the Braves make no sense in that they already have 2 pretty highly paid Corner Infielders.
I hate to say they're just making it up, but it sounds like they just picked three teams out of a hat to go along with New York.
Posted by: CarpeDiem | November 14, 2007 at 09:39 PM
Tyler... you must be a Yankee fan... because that offer is laughable.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | November 14, 2007 at 09:40 PM
If my numbers aren't mistaken, the numebr of homegrown players in the regular lineups of AL East teams is as follows:
Yankees: 4 (Jeter, Posada, Cano, Cabrera)
Boston: 2 (Youkilis, Pedroia)
Toronto: 3 (Wells, Rios, Hill)
Baltimore: 2 (Roberts, Markakis)
Tampa Bay: 4 (Crawford, Upton, Young, Gomes)
* I didn't count Japanese players who came over as established players (Matsui, Iwamura)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 09:41 PM
Doesn't the Braves rumor assume Chipper is finally being moved off 3B into LF?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 09:42 PM
i agree whdh in boston in my opinion isnt a good leader for rumors, listen to the boston globe more, they are right more
Posted by: 04Forever | November 14, 2007 at 09:42 PM
Yanks homegrown:
SS
CF
2B
C
1B (most likely)
The entire starting rotation (if Ian Kennedy is your 5th starter over Mussina)
And Closer.
Red Sox homegrown:
2B
1B
CF (most likely)
1 starter
Closer
Could count Matsui and Dick-K since they have never played for another team
Posted by: tyler | November 14, 2007 at 09:44 PM
"If my numbers aren't mistaken, the numebr of homegrown players in the regular lineups of AL East teams is as follows:"
This might be my worst sentence ever here.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 09:44 PM
The two that stand out for a trade are Matsui and Damon, Matsui is a better trade bait. I can see Damon going for a couple pitching prospects and the Yankees eating up to half his salary to a place like St. Louis, Angels, Oakland or San Diego.
I think Giambi can be moved, mainly to a west coast team with another headache player, like Richie Sexson in Seattle or to the Giants for Ray Durham. I assume Giambi has a no trade clause or has to agree to the trade. Another place would be the Angels, but the Yankees probably have to eat some of his salary, like $10 million.
Even though Matsui re-up his contract in the past year and has huge marketing clout for the Yankees. I can see a team like Seattle interested in him, given they are already looking in Japan for a slugger to add to their very strong batting line up, (with the exception of Sexson) they also need a right fielder to replace Guillen. So some sort of trade with Matsui and Giambi to Seattle, probably very far fetch, but I think the Yankees would love to get rid of Giambi if they can find something in his contract to boot him from New York, or put even more pressure on him via the NY Tabloids, he could accept some sort of trade to a west coast team.
Posted by: okojo | November 14, 2007 at 09:45 PM
Jason Varitek is not a homegrown player. He was in the majors for Seattle before the famous (or infamous depending on your view) Lowe and Varitek for Slocumb deal.
Posted by: Makaveli616 | November 14, 2007 at 09:47 PM
No.
First of all, hes due to make some big cash. Second of all, he can't stay healthy for a full season.
The yankees certainly aren't giving up Abreu along with Phil Hughes or Joba Chamberlain for Ben Sheets
Posted by: tyler | November 14, 2007 at 09:47 PM
No, not at all, the braves already tried that about five years ago and chipper could never stay healthy because he constantly hurt is hamstring. Furthermorem, the braves have a very nice option in matt diaz in left field, a guy who can hit .315 and knock 15-20 homeruns while also driving in around 85 if he played everyday. Also, the braves are not going to give 15 million to lowell when that money should be saved to give to teixera. No matter which way you slice it, lowell to the braves makes no sense whatsoever.
Posted by: bravesbeast | November 14, 2007 at 09:48 PM
Move Chipper to LF with his knees... now?!? Are you crazy?
Actually, they could move Chipper or Lowell to 2B and move Johnson to CF.
Posted by: TrueCubsFan | November 14, 2007 at 09:49 PM
About competitive balance in baseball, lets not forget the Rockies, D-backs, and Indians (even the phillies are right in the mid-level). Also Milwaukee and San Diego were in it until the end. Building a team takes strategy and skill. Low market teams must be more creative to stay competitive, but that doesn't mean that they can't do it. The Marlins will easily be the team to beat again in a few years with all their young talent and the prospects received from getting rid of cabrera. Its all strategy, big spending teams can be seen as the power hitting team, while small market teams rely on speed and single hitters. Everyone gets to the postseason in different ways.
Posted by: yanks144 | November 14, 2007 at 09:49 PM
Not saying the Braves are really pursuing him, just saying that if they did, Jones to LF would be the solution (as opposed to Jones/Lowell to 2B).
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 09:50 PM
I never mentioned Hughes or Joba, but Ian Kennedy? Come on...
He's due to make some big cash for a reason.... he's good.
And why do the Brewers need Abreu? I'll take Hart, Mench, and Hall/Gwynn over Abreu any day.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | November 14, 2007 at 09:54 PM
If the Yankees want to pay Lowell stupid money for 4 years, they can have him. The Red Sox didn't bite on Damon and they won't fall for this Yankee stunt.
Posted by: SierraM | November 14, 2007 at 09:57 PM
First off, I was responding to another poster who mentioned the Brewers.
Second, if you would rather have Hart of Mench instead of one year of Abreu you're nuts.
Posted by: tyler | November 14, 2007 at 09:58 PM
As it stands now the Angels have starters at:
C (Napoli/Mathis)
1B (Kotchman)
2B (Kendrick)
3B (Figgins)
LF (Anderson/Willits)
DH (Morales)
3 of their starting pitchers (Lackey, Santana, Saunders)
most of their bullpen (K-Rod, Shields, etc)
As a side note - I will be PISSED if the Angels made any sort of offer to Mike Lowell. He will be absolutely average in Anaheim. We don't need a 36 year old 3B making $15m/year.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 14, 2007 at 09:59 PM
*** comments were in reference to home grown talent ***
Posted by: bjsguess | November 14, 2007 at 10:00 PM
As a Red Sox fan I think it would be awesome if this happened. I'll take the draft pick gladly and get 80-90 percent of his value somewhere else on the cheap. Meanwhile the Yankees continue to act on inside information that the AL will go to the as many DHs as you want format in 2010.
Posted by: walkoffblast | November 14, 2007 at 10:02 PM
Not Joe Morgan, Chipper Jones is NOT moving to LF. I absolutely guarantee that. And second base? Has whoever suggested that ever watched a Braves game?
I think the report that the Braves are after Lowell is just bad reporting (speculation), but the only way it could be happening is if the Braves are trading Tex, which is equally unlikely.
Again, please... Chipper Jones will NOT be moved to left field or 2B.
Posted by: AtlantaMike | November 14, 2007 at 10:02 PM
If this Lowell to NY rumor is true I'm confused.
I thought the plan was that Jorge could be moved over to 1st base once his catching days were over? Could have sworn that I heard that straight from a Steinbrenner's mouth.
Oh well, guess you really can't take anything they say as truth.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 14, 2007 at 10:03 PM
How are you getting the same inside information as the Yankees?
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 10:03 PM
Before we get the oxygen tent in here, let's not forget the Real Baseball equation!
(# of homegrown players x 10) + (# of white players x 10) + (50 if city's population
Posted by: Oui Oui | November 14, 2007 at 10:10 PM
No way the Braves are in on Lowell. We already have Chipper, who is just as good and about the same age. The only place you would move Chipper at this point in his career is 1B, but that's already occupied.
I agree that the Lowell to 1B speculation is just the Yankees driving up the price for the Sox.
Posted by: Thundersticks | November 14, 2007 at 10:12 PM
You're being modest, Thundersticks. Chipper is much, much better than Mike Lowell. He had a sensational 2007 that seemed to fly pretty much under everyone's radar.
(Please note I hate Chipper Jones. I hate the player and the stupid name. This was hard for me to type.)
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 10:14 PM
I hear he hates you too, NJM.
Posted by: AtlantaMike | November 14, 2007 at 10:17 PM
hahahaha, chipper jones does sound like a golf club
Posted by: 04Forever | November 14, 2007 at 10:17 PM
"Its all strategy, big spending teams can be seen as the power hitting team, while small market teams rely on speed and single hitters. Everyone gets to the postseason in different ways."
yanks144, this is horrible analysis on your part. The Indians and Rockies are power hitting teams. The Indians don't steal bases. Ever. Sizemore's pretty much the only one, and even he hits for 30 HR power. And go look at that Rockies lineup again. Just awful logic.
Posted by: nickjs21 | November 14, 2007 at 10:19 PM
I'm a nobody to Chipper Jones. So, ha ha, the joke is on you.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 10:20 PM
"Before we get the oxygen tent in here, let's not forget the Real Baseball equation!
(# of homegrown players x 10) + (# of white players x 10) + (50 if city's population
Classic.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | November 14, 2007 at 10:20 PM
"No, not at all, the braves already tried that about five years ago and chipper could never stay healthy because he constantly hurt is hamstring. Furthermorem, the braves have a very nice option in matt diaz in left field, a guy who can hit .315 and knock 15-20 homeruns while also driving in around 85 if he played everyday. Also, the braves are not going to give 15 million to lowell when that money should be saved to give to teixera. No matter which way you slice it, lowell to the braves makes no sense whatsoever.
Posted by: bravesbeast | November 14, 2007 at 09:48 PM "
Wait, since when did playing Third Base prevent Chipper from constantly getting hurt? :P
Seriously though, Lowell to Atlanta makes no sense. Particuarly since they seem to be pinching pennies lately to be able to keep Tex. They'll probably sign Glavine, maybe a reliever, and go with what they have.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | November 14, 2007 at 10:23 PM
So far I have been reasonably pleased with Cashman's job this offseason. If he signs Lowell I will be absolutely disappointed in him for making such a stupid decision
Posted by: Reywtf | November 14, 2007 at 10:24 PM
if we are all getting hard ons for our team's home grown talents, the braves are up there with the best of 'em
and chipper isn't moving to lf... not only for health issues, but because he is one of the better defensive 3b in the game
i have no idea where that lowell rumor came from
Posted by: dudetheplayer | November 14, 2007 at 10:32 PM
I have no idea where the concept of Chipper as a top defensive 3B came from.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/thtstats/main/index.php?view=fielding&linesToDisplay=50&orderBy=zone_rating&direction=DESC&qual_filter=1&season_filter%5B%5D=2007&league_filter%5B%5D=All&pos_filter%5B%5D=5&Submit=Submit
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 14, 2007 at 10:36 PM
Yanks144,
Yes, low-budget teams need to be “creative” ~ ie only plan on competing for a year or two every 15 years or so. It must be great being Tigers or Royals fans who see teams with some type of talent once every 20 years… On the flip side, NY, BOS and others just throw money away, wasting more than some teams spend as a whole…
Also, you guys have to stop the “homegrown talent” thing ~ it’s a bit different than it once was… The draft is now a market where the players decide which position they will be bought out of in their dictating how much money they will make. The first problem in the situation. Then we have the fact that a “homegrown talent” in KC, TB, FLA, PIT, etc has a 4-5year shelf-life before they almost have to be traded. Even if the best players in the game happen to end up on the lesser teams, its only a short period of time before they would walk for the millions the cash-cows dangle. So, “homegrown talent” in NY or BOS where they can afford to actually keep them well into their arbitration years is a bit different than “Homegrown talent” in Cle or Min where they have to pick and choose wisely which of the players they can actually afford to keep longer than 5 years. If those two teams had 150Mil to blow then nearly the entire roster would be “homegrown talent”; as it is though, they need to squeak by constantly replacing the talent they do find…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | November 14, 2007 at 10:40 PM
I could see if the yankees needed Lowell for third but if your going to pay all that money for arod i would put whatever money is left over towards pitching. We need someone that can pitch out in the pen. We have some good starters next year as long as everyone is healthy. Put Duncan or Phillips at first for next year, we dont need Lowell.
Posted by: steveo | November 14, 2007 at 10:41 PM
At what point is it the Big market teams fault for over paying and at what point does it become that small market teams are too cheap?
Fair enough no one can compete on the level of the Sox and Yankees, but there is plenty more talent and races to be won throughout the MLB that money can buy.
On my last post, I was more going for a metaphor with small and big market teamsm, not there actual style of play. I agree, read that way it, was pretty bad analysis.
Posted by: yanks144 | November 14, 2007 at 10:50 PM
Could it be possble that the braves will move lowell to 2b and either trade or move kelly johnson to the outfield? Maybe the braves are discussing trading chipper...
Posted by: bravesfan23 | November 14, 2007 at 10:51 PM
...Didnt Tex use to play left field???
Posted by: bravesfan23 | November 14, 2007 at 10:57 PM
Morons...
Posted by: henry14theking | November 14, 2007 at 10:57 PM
as i guy that watched the braves the whole year, chipper is an excellent 3b defensively
forgive me if i'm a little old school and don't have any clue what you were linking to, njm, but by fielding percentage (i'm pretty sure he was third in the league) and my own eyesight i know that chipper is a damn fine defender
Posted by: dudetheplayer | November 14, 2007 at 11:03 PM
i mean that fucking stat has kouzmanoff rated above chipper... seriously?
nice attempt, brah
Posted by: dudetheplayer | November 14, 2007 at 11:06 PM
agreed.
Kouz may be a nice little player on the rise but his defense is definetly average.
Posted by: Green Grove | November 14, 2007 at 11:14 PM
jones has the 4th highest fielding pct in the majors...who cares about the his revised zone rating
Posted by: bravesfan23 | November 14, 2007 at 11:15 PM
lowell-cards rumor? wtf? when was there a lowell cards rumor?
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 12:02 AM
"According to a Boston television station, Lowell has already received offers from the Braves, Angels, Cardinals, and Yankees."
Reading before posting is cool.
And yes we know the television rumor is nonsense. FWIW the source "is close to Mike Lowell"
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | November 15, 2007 at 12:10 AM
The Braves connection is being blown way out of proportion. I'm fairly certain that the braves did call Lowell's agent to kick the tires, as they have been for almost every FA on the market. Most teams will do that this time of year. Take a look at years past. It's not unheard of for a player to sign with a team out of left field for seemingly no other reason then they made an offer. Even if the Braves made an offer it's almost certainly a lowball offer just in case.
If Lowell did jump to the braves for pennies (which he would almost certainly not) it's not the end of the world. Tex is a great player but he is only under team control for one more year. I can see him becoming available if contract talks break down this winter.
Further, 1B is not out of the question for Chipper. His bat is doing quite well and if his legs/hands start hurting him he could switch. That said, he would need a replacement who plays some very good ball in place before he or the team would consider the move.
Posted by: Torchy | November 15, 2007 at 12:11 AM
Jones is rated as almost exactly average by the probabilistic model of range (baseballmusings.com), and a little below average by RZR. Wouldn't you expect an experienced fielder with leg problems to have a good fielding percentage and (relatively) poor range?
Posted by: ryne | November 15, 2007 at 12:11 AM
hey arodsucksatlife, there were no projected figures or years offered by the cardinals that i have read about on this page
not being such a dick helps
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 12:14 AM
So instead of reading whats being talked about you just leap in with some nonsense? That explains alot.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | November 15, 2007 at 12:22 AM
noooo, the page got updated with a update on lowell, so i changed it up, sorry i screwed the whole website up for you, if you like you can go back to your other conversation now
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 12:25 AM
I'm just pissy cause I really want A-rod on the Red Sox. All this MFY sign Rivera, MFY sign Posada, MFY ready to sign A-rod, MFY getting Lowell to ride the bench, and be a backup catcher nonsense is pissing me off.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | November 15, 2007 at 12:29 AM
why is your name arodsucksatlife if you want him to be a red sock, are you a red sox fan?
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 12:37 AM
I don't think the Yankees are even allowed to sign both. You are only allowed to sign 3 Type A FAs.
Not Joe Morgan,
Blue Jays
1b - Overbay. Trading Jackson and Bush to get him is hardly going out and buying talent.
2b - Hill. homegrown draft
ss - McDonald/Adams/Olmedo bench FA pickup/homegrown
3b - Glaus. Traded homegrown favorite Hudson and Batista to get him.
LF - Johnson/Lind homegrown draft
CF - Wells homegrown draft
RF - Rios homegrown draft
C - Zaun/Thigpen. Cheap FA signing and youngsters coming up.
SPs- Halladay McGowan Janssen Litsch Marcum Chacin all homegrown. Burnett added as FA.
DHs- Thomas and Stairs. FAs
As I said. Only Thomas and Burnett are signifcant FA additions. To say that all teams in the AL east have "bought" lineups is absurd.
Posted by: 92-93 | November 15, 2007 at 12:39 AM
homegrown teams are so hard to put together though. The only team to have like almost have an entire team on homegrowns were the 03 marlins, and pretty much every guy from that team is an all star these days. thats rare, and probably wont happen ever again
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 12:43 AM
i retract some of my previous statement, the rockies rookies were pretty friggen cool this year, i cant wait to see if that team can put something togather
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 12:45 AM
He does suck at life, just not at baseball. He could step on puppies and I'd still want his 1.000 ops 45/130 manning 3b and breaking the homerun record at Fenway. Not to mention how nice it would be to steal a dominant player away from the Bronx after all this traffic the other way.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | November 15, 2007 at 12:46 AM
yeah, but then you are taking a chance with that horrify post season average. i dont like the image he casts either, i dont want a "notorious" guy on the team, just like i wouldnt want barry bonds, i believe sometimes you have to make a decision of personality over power, especially with this much money on the table, i could have like 3 kids by the time this kids contract is over and he has made more money then some third world countries will during those ten years.
ps- i like the puppies line, that was funny
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 12:54 AM
arod is in a sense shea hillenbrand, but a good baseball player
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 12:55 AM
I think it takes a whole new level of douchebaggery to be this talented and this loathed. He's worse than Bonds cause even his own teams fans hate him. It boggles the mind.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | November 15, 2007 at 01:02 AM
If the Sox resign Lowell = win.
If the Yankees sign Lowell for 1B = epic bad Karma that dwarfs the cubs.
Lowell for 1B for the Yankees is pathetic, there is no other word. He isn't a first baseman, his game doesn't suit Yankee Stadium, and he would cost a lot of money.
I really really hope Yankees fan realise how pathetic that is IF it is true.
I just am grateful that Theo isn't that stupid, he won't follow that road.
Posted by: quintjs | November 15, 2007 at 01:52 AM
WOW, Lowell to ATL is pretty crazy. the only way i see this happening is if ( stay with me cause its pretty long) they sign lowell and he plays 2b, this would open the door to package KJ to the A's for blanton or harren ( previous posts and rumors have said a deal would start with kj) then the braves wouldnt sign tex due to money issues, the braves would move chipper to 1b and then lowell to 3b and have prado be your 2b in 09. now did anyone follow that? cause i had a hard time and im the one writing it.
Posted by: thedeuce | November 15, 2007 at 07:08 AM
I hate other teams bitching that the Yankees buy their Champions. First of all it's not the Yankees fault that the other teams suck and their fans don't want to see them play. Yankees got money, what do you want them to do look at it, they spend it because the can! Also Lowell to Yankees is BS if you ask me.
Posted by: yankfan1 | November 15, 2007 at 07:20 AM
"Jones is rated as almost exactly average by the probabilistic model of range (baseballmusings.com), and a little below average by RZR. Wouldn't you expect an experienced fielder with leg problems to have a good fielding percentage and (relatively) poor range?"
Exactly. Using only fielding percentage is ignoring its basic deficiency; it doesn't measure range at all. If Tulowitski goes 30 feet into the hole, backhands the ball and tosses it away when he would have had the runner, its an error and his FP decreases. If Jeter can't get to it and the batter singles, its not and his FP is unaffected. See the problem? RZR takes into account *all balls* a fielder should be expected to get to and lets you do a true comp. Fielding metrics aren't yet close to perfect, but RZR is a pretty strong one to look at.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | November 15, 2007 at 08:43 AM
"First of all it's not the Yankees fault that the other teams suck and their fans don't want to see them play." LOL
Nice work, making yourself look like a moron.
Here is one sox fan hoping Lowell stays for 3 years (2 would be better, haha), or we get some nice draft pick compensation from whoever signs him (I could care less if it is the Yankees). Trade for Blalock or Chavez (or Cabrera). Hell, sign Mike Lamb. Don't commit long term to aging players. It doesn't work.
Posted by: Mr_Punch | November 15, 2007 at 08:50 AM
I cannot imagine there's a Yankee fan on the planet that wants to see Lowell playing first base for them.
This is one of the most idiotic ideas I've EVER heard, and honestly I think there's two options:
1) Steinbrenner (one of them) is into the whole "screw the Red Sox thing" and is overriding Cashman on this (which doesn't bode well at all for us).
2) They're trying to drive up the price for the Red Sox.
I hope, and still think, that it's #2.
Personally I'd love to see Lowell stay with the Sox because his 2007 was so lucky and there's no way he'll repeat it - but with all those apparent offers out there, it's unlikely. Theo is too smart to overpay when there are other options (unlike Posada).
Posted by: bobo | November 15, 2007 at 08:56 AM
Yankfan1,
A couple of points, and I apologize in advance for length…
Yes, it's a common refrain that the Yankees buy their championships, but the complaints run deeper than that. The biggest problem with the Yankees' spending is what it does to the overall market. There is nothing wrong with this in a free market, but when the Yankees bid against themselves and throw more money at a player than is necessary to sign him, they set a market precedent that becomes a standard for future free agents, and it drives up the cost of players across baseball. I think it would be less of a gripe if the Yankees actually outbid other teams by just as much as is necessary to get the player to sign, but they don't. They spend cavalierly, and the ripple effect is felt across the industry.
It's not just the Yankees. When Hicks doled out $252M for A-Rod in 2000, he guaranteed that there was no way in 2007 that A-Rod would sign his next contract for less. But the Yankees haven't won any sort of coup here. They're rumored to be offering 10 years at $27.5-28M per year when there is no indication that any other team was even willing to go beyond eight. We'll see how it shakes out, but a 10-year/$275-280M deal for A-Rod will have a damning effect on the team that tries to lock up Cabrera. We're in an era where a rapidly graying Mike Lowell could command $15M per year for four years, coming off his FIRST season maintaining a .300 average.
The point of all this is, MLB is not a vacuum. Keeping the market manageable, so that the revenue-sharing plan actually works as intended, depends on the fiscal responsibility of every owner. Other teams (Red Sox come to mind) have money to burn, but still consider the market when they make their offers, wringing every iota of value that they can out of every dollar. They've had their own "Yankee" moments -- J.D. Drew is overpaid (though not as much as some might think), and their bid for Matsuzaka showed that the posting system eliminates most teams -- but for the most part they behave as a rational business. The Yankees do not. If the goal of a corporate entity is to maximize profits, the Yankees should be looking to secure their valuable assets for only as much as is necessary to achieve their goal.
As for your claim that it's not the Yankees' fault that "other teams suck and their fans don't want to see them play," that's not an accurate characterization of situation. Do you know where the Yankees ranked in fan capacity for home games in 2007? 7th. They don't fill Yankee Stadium.
What the Yankees do have is the luxury of location. New York is the biggest market in MLB. It's not a function of fan loyalty, and it's not just a function of spending. It's a function of population numbers. The Yankees have money because they can support their own cable network. They can support a cable network because they have a geographic base of millions to watch that network. Ditto the Red Sox, on a much smaller scale. Because the Yankees have cable revenue, they can spend money. Because they can spend money, they can achieve success. Because they can achieve success, they can expand their fan base by signing watchable players and through good marketing. This is a luxury a team in, say, Tampa Bay, simply does not have, regardless of whether the owner is willing to spend money to create a winner.
You got one thing exactly right in your post, however… "they spend it because they can!" True.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 15, 2007 at 09:59 AM
Well put DunkinDonuts.
Posted by: Mr_Punch | November 15, 2007 at 10:36 AM
dunkin you could have saved like 20 minutes of typing, said your last sentence and i would have been satisfied
Posted by: 04Forever | November 15, 2007 at 10:47 AM
"As for your claim that it's not the Yankees' fault that "other teams suck and their fans don't want to see them play," that's not an accurate characterization of situation. Do you know where the Yankees ranked in fan capacity for home games in 2007? 7th. They don't fill Yankee Stadium."
You really have to look at all the numbers if you're going to use that data to make that claim. The Yankees don't always sell out Yankee Stadium, yes, but it's the biggest AL stadium by 8,000, the biggest ML stadium by 1,000 (and second is RFK, which is a problem), they sold 4.2+ mil. tickets this year, over 500,000 more than the next-place Dodgers, and they were the second biggest road draw after the Red Sox. The Yankees' 52,000+ per game is enough to have sold out all but Dodger Stadium, RFK, Shea, and Yankee stadium on a daily basis.
Also, I don't know that the Red Sox necessarily have the "best" fan support--they may, but this doesn't really prove anything--b/c they fill small-park Fenway up to 101.4 %.
Posted by: Oui Oui | November 15, 2007 at 11:24 AM
DunkinDonuts, a lot of good points, and as a Yankee fan I wish they didn't spend so cavalierly. This year was one of the most fun precisely because kids and home-grown players were the ones who got them to the postseason.
But I don't know if I agree with your statement: "when the Yankees bid against themselves and throw more money at a player than is necessary to sign him, they set a market precedent that becomes a standard for future free agents, and it drives up the cost of players across baseball."
Sure, the salaries of players the Yankees sign are higher, but what about everyone else? It takes other owners to bid them up. Smart GMs (read: Beane, Towers, etc.) will look for the undervalued commodities. Pre-moneyball, it was OBP. Then it became poor defensive players. I once saw a argument defending the Giants' geriatric roster that old players were undervalued.
Towers has said that he's found value by looking at failed starters and turning them into relievers.
Anyway, I'm getting a little off the point, but let's go back to your statement about the Yankees driving up the price for everyone else.
So Lowell signs for $15M. Now let's say that a player a bit worse than Lowell was a FA. Edwin Encarnacion, say. You'd blame the Yankees if other teams now think he's worth $12M a year instead of $7M?
That's those teams acting irrationally, and they are influenced by the Yankees, that that's their problem.
Again, the smart teams will find a more efficient way to spend their money. And if they just can't afford anyone, but 2/3 of the other teams CAN, then they really shouldn't have a franchise at all.
Also, may I remind you that it's the players who have formed the strongest union in sports and who would never agree to a salary cap. And that the Yankees are playing by the rules that the other 29 teams basically got together and set for them.
I agree, I don't like it - but baseball is not a fair game, it's a business.
I personally wish the owners would grow some balls, insist on a cap, and lock the players out. They're rich. They don't need to keep fielding teams. The players need them a lot more than they need the players.
Posted by: bobo | November 15, 2007 at 11:27 AM
bobo,
All very good points. The Yankees are absolutely playing within the rules, and that's why I don't begrudge them the highest payroll in baseball.
$18M pe
With regard to your hypothetical about Lowell v. Encarnacion...
If the $15M is truly a reflection of what it would require to outbid the rest of the baseball, then I have no qualms... the market has set itself. My bone to pick is when the Yankees throw out 10 years, for example, to lock up A-Rod, when there is no other team in the fray.
Despite reports to the contrary (from Yankees mouthpieces), suggesting that the Yankees are establishing the terms of the discussions, the mere fact that $280M has been thrown out as a number suggests that the Yankees are not dealing from a position a strength. They've removed the adversarial aspect of negotiation, and simply taken a "name your price" approach.
I'm not saying it's wrong, per se, I'm just saying the market as a whole would function more rationally if the Yankees functioned as a sane corporation would. Because of the players union, once a number is thrown out there cavalierly, it's out there for good, and it becomes the minimum baseline for other comparable players. There is no universe where Mike Lowell is worth $15M per for 4 years, and if the Red Sox capitulate to a deal like that, I'll be scoffing at them for falling into the trap.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 15, 2007 at 11:53 AM
Oui Oui,
I'm aware of Yankee Stadium's capacity. My point is simply that there are six other teams whose fans are filling their respective stadiums at a higher rate, and that attendance is not what makes the Yankees the biggest spenders in baseball. Yankfan1 was suggesting that other teams don't spend as much because their fans don't want to see them play.
It's ALL about market size.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 15, 2007 at 11:57 AM
Funny, I don't hear anyone complaining about the red sox buying championships..didn't they just become the team with the highest payroll to win a championship? hmmmm
Posted by: PinstripePride26 | November 15, 2007 at 12:11 PM
Pinstripe,
Somehow I doubt you actually read any of the preceding posts. At the very least, you stopped reading after picking out just the part that would allow you to make a defensive post that bears no relation to anything that has just been said.
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 15, 2007 at 12:17 PM
Bobo, nice post…
But here is the thing, just because you cant set a cap doesn’t mean you cant create an even playing field. Here are two dramatic changes which will help teams like Pitt, TB, FLA, etc have a couple stars at all times…
1) Profit sharing is revised. All revenue is pulled and distributed evenly. If the Pirates cant bring in enough to have a 90M payroll now, well they would be able to then. Its what is done in the NFL and it works great!
2) Make the amateur draft an amateur draft again instead of the job fair it currently is. Set a salary cap on the positions, eliminate the infinite amounts of money which can be given as “signing bonuses” and ensure that the talent is distributed in order of talent rather than order of how much money they are telling everyone they would play for.
Those two things will A) give the lower markets the ability to draft top talents without risking the millions that they decide they are worth out of HS or Col. B) ensure that all teams have a good chunk of change to spend on their team no matter what market they are in ~ because really the whole “market” things is an illusion, its not like any of the towns these teams play in are backwood marry-your-cusin type places; they are all large markets able to support teams if there is a reason to support them! The problem currently is that there just isn’t a reason t support some of these teams since they cant field a team resembling ML talent; the catch-22 is that the team will never be able to field a club resembling ML talent if the money isn’t there… Well, that problem would be solved…
What will be the end results? Well, the players will still be getting all the money they want, the owners will still be tossing bad contracts around like crazy and the largest markets will still have a bit more money to play with at all times ~ but each team will also have the ability to support itself, keep the stars they develop and add to those stars from time to time through FA. We wouldn’t have one team making only 30M as a whole, and they wouldn’t be worried about having to trade Cabrera and Willis to the big markets because of what they will cost tomorrow. The rich wont just get richer because teams must surrender their stars to them once they prove their ability, instead the Yanks, BoSox, Mets, etc will have a harder time getting a hold of the Beltrans, Mannys, Giambis etc of the world. It wont be a “ok, go through the minors, then prove yourself for the Royals for 4 years then you will be traded to one of the top 6 teams and get the mega-millions thrown in your lap” set-up we currently have…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | November 15, 2007 at 12:33 PM
AJC writer and Braves columnist Dave O'Brien kills this rumor from a Braves perspective, down in a subsequent post to his blog.
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/ajc/braves/entries/2007/11/12/cox_wren_on_han.html
Posted by: JPX7 | November 15, 2007 at 01:01 PM