 |
|
|
| |
« Jamey Carroll Traded To Indians | Main | Rangers Like Patterson, Ethier, Hamilton, Fukudome »
Rangers Out On Gagne
Evan Grant says the Rangers are out of the bidding for Eric Gagne. Either he's getting a two-year deal somewhere or he's accepting Boston's offer of arbitration. Or, his one-year demand is just too high. We should know soon.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534b3819f970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rangers Out On Gagne:
Comments
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Top Stories
Search MLBTR
MLBTR Features
Recent Posts
Rumors By Team
Monthly Archives
Live Chats
Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST
Do you think the Brewers are in on Gagne?
Posted by: Lidocaine | December 07, 2007 at 08:30 PM
no, he probably accepted arbitration with the sox
Posted by: 04Forever | December 07, 2007 at 08:33 PM
I hope not. The brewers are gettingon my nerves
Posted by: goathedxxx | December 07, 2007 at 08:34 PM
Honestly, even if he accepts arbitration, wouldn't it make sense for the Sox to try and trade him? He didn't do much to help them down the stretch and I think they have his potential replacement in Delcarmen.
Posted by: tolo316 | December 07, 2007 at 08:35 PM
he was brutal with Boston and wont close. Why would he accept arbitration. im not debating you 04 ive heard it a number of times but it just doesnt make sense to me. id rather the Sox get a pick or 2 for him
Posted by: curse_ended | December 07, 2007 at 08:35 PM
exactly tolo316, we only benefit either way. he he doesnt accept, we get the compensation pick, if he does and we keep him, hes eric gagne, we need to give him another chance, or, we trade him for a package that we had to give up for him. we win either way
Posted by: 04Forever | December 07, 2007 at 08:42 PM
The fan base hates him, and he had 19 terrible innings in Boston but its not a bad thing to have Eric Gagne on your roster. It might be a bad thing to trade Gabbard, Murphy and Engel Beltre for him but he is still a good RP.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | December 07, 2007 at 08:43 PM
besides, of course he accepted arbitration, i find it weird that the rangers, the team that saved his career and has players that love him and loves back, to be out of the running for him on the day the arbitration is to be decided unless he accepted. look at it in this point of view, what if he goes back to old school game over? that wouldnt suck
Posted by: 04Forever | December 07, 2007 at 08:45 PM
i dont hate gagne, i just cant figure him out. his case was so odd that im more like wtf happened to you more then holy crap, i hate you as much as i hate the yankees, are you sure they arent paying you to tank on purpose?
players at this caliber are always good to have on your team, no matter how bad they were, if all else fails, somebody would take him off our hands for a pretty penny
Posted by: 04Forever | December 07, 2007 at 08:49 PM
I don't hate him either, but losing Engel Beltre is painful. He is a special talent.
If nothing comes from the Santana talks, and a Crisp/Gagne trade brings back Beltre/Teagarden+ all will be right with the world.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | December 07, 2007 at 09:55 PM
"If nothing comes from the Santana talks, and a Crisp/Gagne trade brings back Beltre/Teagarden+ all will be right with the world."
There is no chance in hell. LOL I don't think the Rangers would do Teagarden alone for Crisp, much less throw in Beltre + more for him and Gagne...They don't need bullpen arms that badly.
Posted by: | December 07, 2007 at 10:13 PM
gagne declines...o well
Posted by: 04Forever | December 08, 2007 at 12:57 AM