![]() |
|
|
| |
« Questions For The Mailbag? | Main | Mailbag: Roberts, Teixeira, Johan, Nathan, And More »
UPDATE, 1-16-08 at 1:18pm: The deal is for $3.5MM plus incentives. The signing looks solid to me; the Cubs needed a little depth at the back end of their rotation and the risk is very small. Lieber had also spoken to the Reds, but the Cubs were his first choice.
UPDATE, 1-16-08 at 10:45am: Rosenthal confirms the signing; it's a one-year deal. He says Lieber won't have to fight for a rotation spot. That might mean Jason Marquis is headed out of town or Ryan Dempster back to the 'pen (I suppose Dempster could be dealt instead). I guess Sean Marshall is the sixth man if he's not traded.
FROM 1-16-08 at 10:14am:
According to Paul Sullivan of the Chicago Tribune, the Cubs "appear close to signing veteran right-hander Jon Lieber." Sullivan says Lieber would compete for the team's fifth starter job. Bruce Levine called this rumor earlier this month.
Lieber had some solid years for the Cubs, winning 20 games in '01. He had surgery in July of '07 for a ruptured tendon in his foot, missing the rest of the season. He'll be 38 in April.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c77862970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cubs Sign Lieber:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
#5 starter Jason Marquis or Jon Leiber, pick your poison.
Posted by: goose102977 | January 16, 2008 at 10:22 AM
Marquis is going to be the #4 already, so it would be up for grabs between Leiber and Dempster. I like the idea of bringing in Leiber because Hendry will not have to pay much for him. Plus it gives Dempster competition for the starting rotation.
Posted by: MoeBigS | January 16, 2008 at 10:33 AM
I think Jason should have the spot for the first half, and when he annually starts blowing it, bring Lieber it. Its like a platoon of pitchers! Could work out really well. I like this signing, depending on the cash. I still hope Gallagher gets a shot though, he could be very good for them. This would mean in order for that to happen, they would have to be able to dump Dempster or Marquis.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 10:34 AM
I don't mind this sign at all. No team can enough pitching going into Spring Training, but this must mean that Gallagher and Marshall have no confidence from management. We could still be trying to move them. At this point I cannot think of whom. It sounds as if the Roberts deal is dying.
Also, I am guessing Lieber will sign for a million or so, right? If that is true, why not sign Prior for 3-4 million? For a team with 120 million dollar payroll, what's 2 million? Both of these guys have injury history, and Prior is a decade younger. No sense crying over normal Cubbie behavior I assume.
Posted by: childersb | January 16, 2008 at 10:34 AM
A radio report said that the Cubs did sign him.
Well, it gives some depth for the #5 spot. The Cubs do not believe Dempster will hold on to the #5 job, but are giving him a fair shot. With Lou, who knows.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 10:39 AM
"Also, I am guessing Lieber will sign for a million or so, right? If that is true, why not sign Prior for 3-4 million?"
Prior did not want to be with the Cubs...PERIOD.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 10:41 AM
Agreed...lets move on from Prior. k?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 10:45 AM
Maybe Marquis could be dealt to the O's if there are still any talks about the Roberts trade?
Posted by: MoeBigS | January 16, 2008 at 10:51 AM
A mil? Gotta be at least 3-4.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | January 16, 2008 at 10:51 AM
What in the world would the O's want with Marquis? I am guessing that Dempster is back in the pen or traded.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 10:56 AM
I think Marquis has negative trade value.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | January 16, 2008 at 10:57 AM
This is a good move by the Cubs. It gives them a little more flexibility in terms of tradeable arms. They can move Marquis, Dem, Marshall and still have a good rotation. But I see this signing more as a precursor of something big yet to come. Jim always does a small thing followed by something big.
Posted by: airassault101 | January 16, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Now if we can only get Brant Brown back...kidding.
I am curiuos which direction Mr. Hendry goes. Will he keep Marshall and Gallagher and try to do a trade of either Marquis or Dempster. Or does he have Marquis and Dempster and Lieber back there. Lieber has a spot, so does Marquis and Dempster battle/platoon a spot. Or does Dempster not get a chance to start and go back to the pen. At least it tells me the team was not sold on Marquis and Dempster at 4 & 5.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 11:01 AM
I like this signing for a few reasons.
1- It probably means that demp will be given a shot as a starter but they are not going to count on him to succeed which means you added depth back to the bullpen.
2- This should push Gallagher and Hart back to AAA where they can refine their pitching and build up their innings. Maybe these guys get call ups for spot starts or bullpen action during the season. The Cubs are much better getting these guys a lttle action at a time as opposed to just throwing them in to the fire as a starter for an entire season.
3- This will bring some veteran presence to the team which may help Z, Lilly, and Hill for the playoff push and the playoffs.
4- You can never have too much pitching.
Posted by: integr96 | January 16, 2008 at 11:09 AM
Excellent move, although the argument can be made for Livan instead (look at those IP!).
Still, we can now use the SP depth to deal for Byrd.
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 16, 2008 at 11:21 AM
My guess is Marshall for Byrd.
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 16, 2008 at 11:23 AM
You guys, Marquis really cant be taken out of the rotation ~ he is still owed upward of 16M for the 08&09 seasons because of the ballooning contract they signed him to. If they were ever going to take him out and just eat that cash, it would have been last year when the team was trying to get back into the playoff mix and he was posting a 5.73 ERA and 1.54 WHIP after the break…
This just gives them the depth they said they wanted behind Dempster. I guess the two will fight it out for the 5th spot in the pre-season and the looser becoming a Longman. It probably signals the end of Marshall starting in Chicago though, and probably moving to the pen full-time (baring trade of course). Sean can be skipped on the depth-cart very easily since he’s LH (as are Lilly & Hill) and because of Gallagher being ready now with Kevin Hart or even Angel Guzman back sometime late in the season if it’s a desperate situation.
Posted by: darkstar1661 | January 16, 2008 at 11:28 AM
Maybe we can audition Marquis in CF and hope he can duplicate his .786 OPS of 2005.
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 16, 2008 at 11:34 AM
When Lieber was with the Cubs the 1st time, he used to ride his bike to games which I thought was cool.
Posted by: ziola1039 | January 16, 2008 at 11:38 AM
Maybe this a precursor to Rich Hill and a bunch of prospects to Baltimore for Bedard/Roberts.
Posted by: NancyEcho1469 | January 16, 2008 at 11:42 AM
I agree that this may be the precursor to something bigger. However, no one is going to want Marquis because of the bloated contract, so this may signal one of two things...
1. The Cubs added depth to their pitching so they can afford to move both Gallagher and Marshall. There was a rumor that the O's wanted Colvin, Marshall, and Gallagher for Roberts. It's overpaying, but in all honesty with Fukudome and Soriano longterm, the Cubs only have a spot for Pie or Colvin.
2. The Cubs are looking to trade Dempster. MacPhail has commented that he hasn't gotten the trade offers to fill the holes his team needs, and is now looking at free agency. One of those holes is closer, and Dempster is better than any of the free agents out there.
Honestly, I hope it's the second, but I doubt it. Colvin and Dempster for Roberts would be best, I'd even like throwing Marshall in. But holding onto Gallagher would be nice.
Posted by: RandomScrub | January 16, 2008 at 11:46 AM
Wasn't there some interest from the Mets for Marquis or Dempster. I thought I remember seeing that at some point early on this off-season but I may just be wishing.
Posted by: CubFan81 | January 16, 2008 at 11:55 AM
I like this signing on a personal level. Last year down in Florida I got to meet Lieber at the hotel we were both staying at. He drove a huge blue monster truck around, which was awesome. I told him as a Cubs fan we missed him and loved what he did in 01. He said he wished he had never left. I'm not surprised at all that he's back. I love the idea of getting Bedard and Roberts and having this deal give pitching depth, I just can't see the Cubs getting both. Who knows though
Posted by: gorsboy2184 | January 16, 2008 at 12:00 PM
CubsFan81,
Here:
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/12/would-mets-cons.html
looks like possibly Marquis + Cash for Endy Chavez if the Mets didn’t find something better for the 5th spot from what I can take of it…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | January 16, 2008 at 12:05 PM
After watching him in Philly for a few years, I dont think Cubs fans should be too optimistic. Yes, it doesnt really hurt to add him as a #5, but it doesnt really help either. His sinker is hardly even AA ball anymore.
Posted by: phightins | January 16, 2008 at 12:17 PM
After making this move, I'm sure the Cubs will take there time with Gallagher to make sure he will be MLB ready. They might of thought about putting him in early for competition in the 5 spot, but with Lieber now, they options. I think that Dempster will start out as the #5 spot, but will eventually lose it. He can't control his pitches for more than 3 innings.
Posted by: MoeBigS | January 16, 2008 at 12:30 PM
Endy > Marquis regardless of salary
They aren't THAT desperate.
Might as well just give the 5 spot to Pelf.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | January 16, 2008 at 12:34 PM
I don't think we want Endy Chavez to back up Pie because Chavez is LH.
The question is whether we would we rather dump Marquis then Marshall. I'm throwing this out there: Does anyone think that the presence of Marshall in the rotation hurts Rich Hill because batters become acclimated to that type of delivery? I do. And so I'd rather move Marshall for Byrd. Keep Marquis in the rotation and let Gallagher take over when he starts to fade.
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 16, 2008 at 12:36 PM
Anyone know the price of this signing?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 12:46 PM
Nevermind, just found out its 1 year, 3.5 mil. If it was any more than 4 I was going to be unhappy with it, but 3.5 will do. I'm sure he will be more productive than Prior next year anyway.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 12:59 PM
I don't know that this is necessarily the precursor to something bigger...I think it is more the realization that marquis is awful. They won't be able to get endy for him...They'd be lucky to get a bag of balls. Nobody is going to want that contract. If the cubs do in fact make a trade, I don't think marquis will be involved.
Posted by: SkiBolton | January 16, 2008 at 01:13 PM
I don't understand the Chavez thing...he is basically what Pie is if Pie sucks. Between he and Sam Fuld, I'm sure they can give you Chavez' numbers, and Pie is just as good, if not better defensively. Remember, there are no walls to jump at wrigley anyway...I have to admit though, that catch he made on Rolen should be worth a contract by itself.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 01:29 PM
You have to think this will lead to another deal. The Cubs now have 8 guys who are capable of starting on a big league team right now, one of which was a pretty effective closer. They have the depth to make a trade. I look for the Roberts deal to be revisited with both Gallagher and Marshall back in the mix. The O's may even take on Dempster since I believe this is his walk year. They get a closer that can help them now and can then choose to either resign him or let him go and use his salary slot to sign someone else. I have to think what was holding up the Roberts deal was the reality that the Cubs would have had no pitching depth had they made the deal -- and with two question marks in the rotation, that's not a good thing. Lieber isn't great, but you know what you're going to get, double digit wins and an ERA in the 4's. The same can't be said for Dempster as a starter. I'll also feel better with Marquis as a 5th guy who can pitch 200 innings and save our bullpen a little. One final tidbit, Roberts seemed to have come out unscathed after the hearings yesterday and should remove any hesitation about the Cubs acquiring him. Ah, but those poor Astros!
Posted by: crunchy1 | January 16, 2008 at 01:37 PM
i don't see how we can avoid putting marquis in the rotation. dumpster and marquis are carbon copies of each other IMO.. and marquis makes 8 mil! no way they just bench him. dumpster would end up with a high 4ish ERA with 11-12 wins as a starter.
zambrano
lilly
hill
lieber
marquis
I'd rather just cut marquis and give gallagher or marshall the job.
Posted by: junbun | January 16, 2008 at 01:52 PM
I'm still hoping for a Dempster, Marshall, Colvin, Murton\Cedeno for Roberts and cash deal.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 02:01 PM
"Hendry hopes to use pitching depth to acquire a middle infielder with speed."
670 the score
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 02:03 PM
I just wrote last night that I didnt think the Cubs rotation would win the division this year. Then they sign Leiber a few hours later. This is going to have the same result as the Yanks bringing back Clemens last yer. Nothing.
They should simply release Marquis and eat his contract, what on earth were they thinking with him?. Is Marmol ever going to start again??
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 02:17 PM
Brewers are going to walk away with the division out hitting everyone and solid pitching from Sheets Capuano Villanueva and Gagne with Kendall calling the action.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 02:19 PM
"I guess the two will fight it out for the 5th spot in the pre-season and the looser becoming a Longman."
Lieber was told he has a spot in the rotation. That was a condition on his signing.
"I'm sure he will be more productive than Prior next year anyway."
I'm Confused. You did not want any more Prior talk and you bring him back up.
"Endy > Marquis regardless of salary. They aren't THAT desperate."
I would guess Hendry will have a tough time unloading that salary.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 02:25 PM
Ok, thats just being ignorant of facts. The Cubs rotation with Marshall as the 5 for about half the year and the rest being spot starts was ranked 2nd in the NL last year. How was the Brewers Rotation?? They are going to walk away with it? Come on dude, you are siting Kendall as a postitive factor here? Gagne for 10 mil? Losing Cordero? Cameron not playing for the first 25 games? Don't tell me they are walking away with anything...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 02:25 PM
I'm sorry, dbacks2007, please sit down for this: Marquis was better than Cappy last year. And Villaneuva is a child; getting excited about him is the same as getting excited about Marshall. Sheets... Well, he's just a ticking time bomb.
I never thought I'd say this but people are actually being unfair to Marquis.
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 16, 2008 at 02:26 PM
Adunacarro, I agree Dempster's the odd man out. Piniella is set on a new closer and he makes too much $ to be in long relief. And I wonder who that "middle infielder with speed could be"? I'd be surprised if the Roberts rumors don't resurface.
Posted by: crunchy1 | January 16, 2008 at 02:27 PM
dbacks, maybe the Cubs can trade Marquis to the Brewers since he would have tied for the lead on their staff in wins. The Brewers rotation, unless a couple of young guys break through, don't scare anyone.
Posted by: crunchy1 | January 16, 2008 at 02:29 PM
D Backs, I was going to rip into your post about the Brewers running away with it, then I read your last line about Carlos Marmol starting again and came to the same conclusion as aduncaroo came to...that's just 100% ignorance.
Teams will be running all over the Brewers with Kendall behind the plate is more likely. Also, Chris Capuano sucks. Didn't he lose a ton of games in a row and it took him 4 months to get a win after April? Yeah, I'm scared to death.
Dempster's out, and probably Marquis, too. Remember, Piniella hated Marquis at the end of the year, and he got into an argument over Marquis with Larry Rothschild in Cincinatti. This probably leads to something bigger... at least I can hope.
Posted by: thecubsdontcatchtheball | January 16, 2008 at 02:32 PM
wins is a team statistic and its a new year, and the Brewers of 07 are from 2007. Capuano was hurt thats why Marquis was "better". If none of the Brewers pitchers won last year how did they finish 2 games back? Ive never been a Brewers fan but this year they are gonna be awesome to watch. They have a good coaching staff too Ned Yost, Robin Yount and Mike Maddux is great leadership.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 02:37 PM
Where did you even come from? Yost literally cost them the division last year, the guy is a retard that gets in fights with his own players when the team is imploding.
What is this fascination you have with the Brewers? They will probably be in the chase, but they aren't running away with anything. You could argue that they are worse than they were last year. The certainly were before the Cameron signing, now they have probably improved slightly. Kenall is awful, I can't believe you cite his as a reason they will be good. After that, there isn't really a reason to go into it any more, you are obviously someone who knows very little about baseball.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 02:41 PM
dbacks2007, while the Yanks signing Clemens last year was in no way worth the money, it certainly helped the team.
Clemens still pitched better than league average, and his first few months with the team were better than the end. They really needed him in the summer - he took away starts from guys like Matt DeSalvo and Tyler Clippard.
Posted by: yanksfan | January 16, 2008 at 02:42 PM
Shame, Yount retired from coaching.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 02:42 PM
The Brewers are not walking away with the division. There are a lot of negatives along with the positives.
I like the Ted Simmons signing as a bench coach. Now maybe Ned won't wet himself down the stretch. You have good hitters. Villanueva looks like a good one.
Now the negatives. Capuano went ho long before winning a game last year. He has to reprove himself. Sheets is great when healthy. He will go down at some point. Gagne has to reprove himself, too. Maybe the NL will bring back something. He will not be what he was in LA. Kendall is a backup at this point. Not only his inability to throw out runners, but his game play. The Brewers are hoping for 'lightning in a bottle'.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 02:43 PM
i know very little about baseball? ouch..
Are you so vicious because I say that Kendall is good? What is your fascination with Kendall hating?? ??
He is solid and has never been in a lineup like this. He is a career .300 hitter who walks more than he strikes out. In this lineup he should get 650 AB so well see how bad he is.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 02:45 PM
This should mean that Dempster is on his way out along with Marshall.
Z
Lilly
Hill
Marquis
Leiber
Dempster's expendable because between Woody, Howry and Marmol the end of the game is set, and there are enough starter's that can perform better than him.
Marshall is out because I can't imagine the Cubs wanting a rotation with Z as the only right-hander and Hill is the kind of pitcher Marshall wishes he could be.
Posted by: Cynic81 | January 16, 2008 at 02:45 PM
I hit submit too soon.
Anyway, for a team not located in Florida, $3.5 million on a starting pitcher isn't much. Prior would've cost about that much and would've contributed a lot less to the Cubs.
I don't know enough about the Cubs depth chart to know where he fits in, but you could certainly do a lot worse than Leiber.
Posted by: yanksfan | January 16, 2008 at 02:46 PM
"Dempster's out, and probably Marquis, too. Remember, Piniella hated Marquis at the end of the year, and he got into an argument over Marquis with Larry Rothschild in Cincinatti. This probably leads to something bigger... at least I can hope."
Don't forget Dempster was not someone Lou liked, either. Remember the first game Dempster was in when Lou walked out to the mound? You could tell by several post game comments Lou does not have a lot of faith in Dempster.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 02:50 PM
650 at-bats for a catcher? Uh huh.
Posted by: MikeMeyer | January 16, 2008 at 02:53 PM
studio is keen, thats the only smart post ive seen. But Kendall is not a backup, I think yall judge based on what you saw for a few months last year. He is Jason Kendall!! Didnt he almost die before he revived his career or was that Kris Benson? Anyway so what hes 38? Carton Fisk?? Pudge ??? Piazza?? They all play till they are 40+ . Even though Piazza is DH he still has those years catching wear and tear. Kendall will put up solid numbers and im sure after all of these years he can call a good game. Who did they have last year Estrada? Hes played for 5 teams already, he sucks. Wasnt Gagne setting up in Boston? I think he could be just as good as Cordero.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 02:53 PM
The Gagne think is completely distorted by the fans and media. He got traded to Boston in a pennant race in the biggest market in baseball and was used as a setup guy on short notice. He went from Solid to Poor before/after the trade. Come on..
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 02:55 PM
"I think he could be just as good as Cordero."
This has to be a bit. I call shenanigans.
Posted by: MikeMeyer | January 16, 2008 at 02:55 PM
Because Kendall is just not a starter any more. I don't hate the guy, but he just isn't good. I really hope we can get Roberts so we can steal 4 to 5 bases on opening day against him. Soto could steal on that guy.
By the way, for any cubs fans, BP just posted the new list of the Cubs top 11 prospects.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7055
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 02:56 PM
I am not hating Kendall. I was all for him coming over to the Cubs midseason. Then I saw him on a daily basis. Ok, I'll say maybe the Brewers can hide him in their line up. He get hits with no one on base. The Brewers can hit around him. His defense will hurt you guys. He tries, but the body just can't do what it once did.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 02:57 PM
He has toped 600 twice and is always close, he hits 1st, up top 1st or 2nd he will get over 600AB. Did PIT or OAK ever have this lineup?? He walks more than Ks , He is possibly going to hit .300 with 50BB and 40K . 600AB with close to a .400 OBP. Thats awesome.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 02:58 PM
Lots of runs for Kendall.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:00 PM
This signing makes me begin to worry what exactly are the Reds looking at for free agents? Leiber would have been a decent option for a 1 year 3.5 mil. That leaves as possibles I would still consider ok as:
Armas Jr.
Kris Benson( New to my options that I hadn't really thought of before)
Freddy Garcia, (Only thing I see a problem with here is his home runs he gives up)
Livan Hernandez ( Though his home runs kinda scare me in Cincy too.)
David Wells, Hummm... I know he is old but he doesn't give up too many Homers and last year was his first year of bad ERA. )
After that the other options just scare me and I would rather have Cincy take its lumps this year and go with the kids and not sign any free agent.
Well congrats Cubs on getting Leiber.
Posted by: JayTheRed | January 16, 2008 at 03:02 PM
By the way, he had 466 ABs last year, which is NOT close to 650.
At all.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Im sure Kendall is getting old, hes not superhuman but he can run around the bases when Braun and Prince HR. He should hit second behind Cameron!! Then he doesnt have Cameron nippin at his heels.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:03 PM
Kendall has NEVER had 650 ABs in a season. I pray that they put him at the top of that order, I would LOVE it. But, they aren't that stupid.
You think I'm judging him based on what he did with the Cubs? Lets see what his numbers were like for Oakland, where he spent most of last year...
.226\.261\.281
Wow. Yes my friend, thats a .542 OPS from an everyday player, and you are touting him as a postive thing? Come on...seriously? And we haven't even mentioned that every projection system out there says Soto is an .800+OPS catcher with above average arm and defense, replacing the .220 average from the catcher's spot last year.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 03:03 PM
I'm just curious, but what do you Cubs fans think about this. Marshall, Gallagher, Colvin, Marmol, Cedeno, and Murton to the O's for both Bedard and Roberts
Posted by: carolina03 | January 16, 2008 at 03:04 PM
dbacks2007, your constant ignorance makes me wonder if you're just trolling. Sorry, but if you're placing that much faith in Kendall to become the savior of a Brewers team that overachieved last year, then you're in for a long season.
A .400 OBP? Really? Oh, and there are a lot of "smarts posts" here, just none by you.
Posted by: Dan Stabbingworth | January 16, 2008 at 03:04 PM
Thanks for the list. I wonder who will be in talks for the 'infielder with speed'. What's the deal with Eric Patterson? Other than the fact he can't get to the ballpark on time.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 03:07 PM
After he singles or BB to 1B , he can then jog around the bases for exercise after Prince, Hall ,Braun and Hardy HR him in. Those guys combined for about 100+ HR. Cameron and Weeks can mash the ball too. 90 Runs for Kendall.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:08 PM
I thinking Kendall swipe atleest 30 baggs next season! YEAH!!!!
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 16, 2008 at 03:09 PM
Wins is a team stat but Marquis had a lower ERA than the other 12 game winners except for Sheets. And the Brewers had a better offense than the Cubs. The Brewers pitching unless a couple of young guys break through will be their demise. And the Kendall thing is pretty funny. Even the Cubs can run wild on that arm.
Posted by: crunchy1 | January 16, 2008 at 03:10 PM
The Brewers could hit close to 200 HR. Kendall will easily have 90 runs.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:11 PM
What is stealing on Kendall going to accomplish, are you going to score 10 runs ?? Thats alot of base stealing.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:13 PM
"You think I'm judging him based on what he did with the Cubs? Lets see what his numbers were like for Oakland, where he spent most of last year..."
His numbers were better with the Cubs. But he sat the bench a lot just before the Cubs got him. I wish him well.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 03:14 PM
dbacks2007,
Piazza turns 40 this year and can't find a job.
Pudge turns 36 this year and has declined significantly in recent years.
Carlton Fisk is in the Hall of Famer, and quite the exception to the rule. Kendall isn't anywhere near his ballpark.
650 AB is a LOT of AB for any player, let alone a catcher. 600 AB is a lot for a catcher even with the chance to DH occasionally, which Kendall won't have.
Kendall is definitely younger than the other guys you mentioned, but he's at the age where the typical catcher declines. Obviously not all do, but, his past 3 seasons show a significant decline over his career up until that point. If it was a 1 year thing, you could give him the benefit of the doubt, but it's a 3 year trend and history is against him at this point.
Not sure what your point is about Gagne changing from closing to setup. Setup is generally considered an easier job than closing, due to less pressure. And that's ignoring the people who feel there's no difference between closing and setup.
Posted by: yanksfan | January 16, 2008 at 03:14 PM
Jason Kendall had more months last year in which he hit under .200 than months in which he hit over .300. He Sucks.
Posted by: Grizzlyfox | January 16, 2008 at 03:19 PM
Fuk u do me u suk
Just watch. I think it could be DBacks and Brewers in the NLCS. Kendall got ran over by a car or something when he was 24. Hes tough!! Ok Fielder will hit 40+ and everyone else on that lineup except Kendall can hit 20-35 HR easily. You dont think hes going to get 650AB?? I wish I could shake that Doug Melvins hand, he did a great job!! Kendall will leadoff or hit second behind Cameron. If Cameron gets on maybe he can steal 30 and put up a Byrnes type season. Chris Gwynn can leadoff until his suspension is over. Nobody else needs to steal because this is the ULTIMATE station to station team. Kendal can trot around the bases if he isnt singling or taking a walk. Kapler off the bench! This is awesome.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:23 PM
"I'm just curious, but what do you Cubs fans think about this. Marshall, Gallagher, Colvin, Marmol, Cedeno, and Murton to the O's for both Bedard and Roberts"
Done deal. I hate losing Marmol, but there is only so much value any reliever holds, as dominating as he is. Bedard + Roberts - the players you listed is probably +10 wins. You can't not do that. Yes, thats a double negative.
I doubt the Orioles would do that trade though.
Yes, Kendall was better with the Cubs, which is why anyone judging him on just his time with us wouldn't make sense. That was the point I was trying to make.
But an OPS below .600? As an everyday player? Thats negative value, even if he was a great defender, which he is not.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 03:23 PM
Cant wait to see the DBacks and Brewers in the playoffs
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:24 PM
Tony Gwynn sorry.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:27 PM
Good move by Hendry brings a veteran and knocks out the Dempster Marquis combo pf them going 4 and 5 in he rotation. What I would do is
TRADE FOR ROBERTS
send Sean Marshall, Ronny Cedeno, Tyler Colvin, Ryan Dempster or Jason Marquis for Brian Roberts
Then trade the other one who didn't get traded to the O's Dempster to another team such as Royals, Mets, Twins for a reliable outfielder such as Endy Chavez, Joey Gathright or Jason Kubel someone to back up in CF
Then have have a rotation like this
Zambrano
Lilly
Hill
Lieber
Gallagher- With a verteran in the rotation Lieber can teach Zambrano, Hill, and Gallagher what to do and shouldn't do.
Posted by: CUBBIES2008 | January 16, 2008 at 03:28 PM
Miller Park is going to shoot up the HR list in the Park Factor. It will be like 1.15-1.20, only CHISOX, PHI, and COL will have more HR.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:30 PM
"But an OPS below .600?"
No doubt about it. Brewers fans have to accept they do not have the Pirates version of Kendall and the Dodgers version of Gagne.
Posted by: studio179 | January 16, 2008 at 03:31 PM
Go ahead, steal a few bases on Kendall haha, thats the only way youre going to get men in scoring position.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:32 PM
OPS is the most rediculous revelation. What does reaching base have to do with slugging. They can be related but not neccesarily. Who cares what his slugging is, he just needs to hit singles and walk more than he strikes out. if he doesnst strike out , WHICH HE DOESNT, then he is taking the pitcher deep into the count. look at his OBP!! and his BA!! Look at that lineup!!!! Look at that park!!!! maybe 100 runs for Kendall.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:35 PM
"Go ahead, steal a few bases on Kendall haha, thats the only way youre going to get men in scoring position."
Hahahaha...
Try having a bad pitching staff with a bad bullpen, and horrible defense. I'd say its going to be pretty easy to get into scoring position...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 16, 2008 at 03:36 PM
Not horrible with Braun in left, Hall at 3rd and Cameron in CF. They are twice as good as last year = better pitching staff.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:38 PM
heck yah, I live 1 mile away from Rockies Spring Training, ill get to see The Brew Crew play COL on March 1st, 13th and 26th. Ill let you know if they are improved!
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:42 PM
Jason Kendall will also hit 40+ HR and have 130 RBI while stealing 30 bases and winning the NL MVP. Seriously, Kendall has never had 650 ABs in a season and topped 100 runs once. You really are just trolling or being dumb. And if not, I don't know what you're smoking, but if you'd contact me I'd like to know the name and number of your dealer cuz that's gotta be some potent stuff.
Posted by: Grizzlyfox | January 16, 2008 at 03:45 PM
Another point is that Kendall is a NL type player. He had no business in OAK. I think yall are just upset that it didnt work out last year. UPWARDS of 650AB , 100R, how is that?? Meaning he will top 600AB and will have around 90 Runs.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:49 PM
Hes only 34 returning to his proper league where he doesnt have a slugger hitting in front of him. He wont have to worry about men on base and baserunning mistakes , especially if hes at the top of the order.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:51 PM
Alright, let's get off of the Kendall crap. Cubs fans were excited when he came over last year. He has a lot of experience and pitchers like him so much for a reason. But Kendall is no longer much of an on the field difference maker. He is still a great catcher to have on any team. Leave it at that.
Posted by: Cynic81 | January 16, 2008 at 03:51 PM
Ok hes a great catcher. Agreed.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:53 PM
BTW I am Jason Kendall
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 03:54 PM
Oh, dbacks2007, isn't Jason dreamy...
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 16, 2008 at 03:56 PM
I dont know jr fuk u do me,
what he look like sorry. I just look at stats.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 04:04 PM
I am rooting for the Brewers, I didnt even know Kendall was on the team till today. I didnt know they lost Cordero till today either. Gagne is solid though, sorry Cubs, you blew it last year when Lilly through his lil' lilly sissy fit on the mound against the Dbacks.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 04:06 PM
Kendall said his father, former major league catcher Fred Kendall, has helped break down his recent deficiencies this offseason.
One last note on Kendall, as this was too good of a quote to pass up. He was being asked about his offseason strategy to improve on his percentage of runners thrown out (while with the Cubs he nailed 2 of 54)-
"We've definitely talked about it," Kendall said. "My big thing with that whole situation is not trying to rush, trying to do too much. If you don't have a chance, eat it."
Why hasn't every other catcher in the league just done that, if you can't get him just don't throw it, duh, that way it's not your fault.
Posted by: Grizzlyfox | January 16, 2008 at 04:07 PM
hahah exactly!! See thats why they are two generations of MLB catchers and you are not.
Posted by: dbacks2007 | January 16, 2008 at 04:09 PM
"I'm just curious, but what do you Cubs fans think about this. Marshall, Gallagher, Colvin, Marmol, Cedeno, and Murton to the O's for both Bedard and Roberts"
Not bad, but if Roberts is worth something like Gallagher, Cedeno, and Marshall on his own, it's going to take more than Marmol, Colvin, and Murton to get Bedard as well. Maybe something like
Bedard
Roberts
Walker
Payton
Pie
Marmol
Murton
Gallagher
Cedeno
Patterson
Colvin
Veal
Posted by: rps | January 16, 2008 at 04:09 PM