![]() |
|
|
| |
« Needs and Luxuries: Atlanta Braves | Main | Orioles Could Re-Sign Corey Patterson »
Bob Dutton of the Kansas City Star took home the Rumor Royalty trophy for the Royals. We did some Q&A as part of the series. Click here to read the other parts of the Dutton Q&A.
MLBTR: What would you consider a reasonable trade return for David DeJesus? Does he have more trade value than Mark Teahen?
Dutton: DeJesus is a proven, reliable player who is under contract for favorable terms through 2011. In other words, he's a long-term piece in the club's plans. Not an All-Star but a good player capable of helping any club.
The Royals are willing to trade him because they have a reasonable alternative in Joey Gathright and have two solid CF prospects (Jose Duarte and Derrick Robinson) who played last year in A-ball. But the only way they trade DeJesus is if they get similar value in return -- a young, proven, reliable player with a favorable contract.
That could be a No. 3 starter -- someone closer to a No. 2 than a No. 4; a corner-position player with some pop; or a long-term fit at catcher. Personally, I don't see that deal out there at the moment, but the Royals are willing to listen.
DeJesus should have more trade value, right now, than Teahen because he's much more of a proven commodity. He also has that club-favorable contract. That said, Teahen has more upside. He can play first, third, left, right and even center. He showed an ability to drive the ball in 2006 before experiencing a power dive in 2007.
Teahen has the tools to be an All-Star, but lots of guys with tools never turn them into skills. This is a big year for Teahen.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c7b087970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dutton On DeJesus/Teahen Trade Value:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
What about DeJesus for Scott Olsen? I've heard that rumor a lot last year when Olsen got his DUI and all that other stuff and the trade almost seems to make too much sense. I know Maybin might play CF but I rather have him in LF and DeJesus in CF with us either trading Willingham for SP or moving him to 1B. I wonder whats Willingham's and Mike Jacobs trade value is at.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | January 07, 2008 at 03:07 PM
This guy has been eating too much home cooked KC BBQ. He is overvaluing DeJesus.
A young #4 starter is about right, NOT a guy who is "closer to a #2"
Posted by: registereduser | January 07, 2008 at 03:10 PM
"I wonder whats Willingham's and Mike Jacobs trade value is at.
"
Jacobs Trade Value - This and a token gets u on the subway.
Willingham Trade Value - A solid double A middle reliever.
Posted by: bsox21 | January 07, 2008 at 03:16 PM
Scot Olsen for Dejesus? Olsen isn't near enough for DeJesus. Olsen had a horrible season and it is hard to tell if he'll ever realize his potential. Dejesus on the other hand is a good proven player who is also young and cheap.
Dutton was right on when he talked about DeJesus's trade value. The most valuable commodity in baseball right now is good, young, cheap players. DeJesus is not a prospect; he's proven. You know you are going to get a high-OBP CFer with some power. He's got good speed and excellent defensive abilities. That is definitely worth a #3 SP who isn't too expensive, or a good young corner OFer with genuine power.
Posted by: NYRoyal | January 07, 2008 at 03:28 PM
Willingham was the 7th best hitting LF last year and 6th best in 2006 via GPA (Which I feel is the best method to judge from a pure bat standpoint since it's essentially runs created with park factors)...and I expect him to move up the list next year considering he had a .621 OPS last year against LHP (And he has crushed LHP his entire career, from minors until now)...he has a lot more trade value then a double a RP. I'm not saying he's a huge commidity, but his value is not that low, expecially considering he's making the minimum and club controlled for 4 more years.
Willingham is also one of the players that has more value to his team than in a trade. He's a very solid player, nothing more, and he's a player you savior while he's club controlled. There's basically no chance of Willingham being traded, atleast pre-arbitration.
I also think you overrated Mike Jacobs value. He's essentially been the worst starting firstbaseman two years running, taking into consideration both offense and defense. Can he get the three-peat in '08?
Posted by: Nny | January 07, 2008 at 03:29 PM
What about Chris Capuano or Dave Bush for Dejesus? maybe throw in a prospect as well.
Posted by: Lidocaine | January 07, 2008 at 03:34 PM
Matt Garza profiles as a young #2/#3. am I giving him up for david dejuses? hell no.
Posted by: trober81 | January 07, 2008 at 03:37 PM
Thats like them asking for Rich Hill for DeJesus. I don't mind them asking for the world, because they have no reason to trade him...but that price is outta control. They aren't getting that.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 07, 2008 at 03:45 PM
HAHAHAHA, Dejesus is worth a 2/3 starter? What planet do we live in that that could be said. 2.1 wins from a 27 year old is NOTHING.
People beat up Sox fans for overvaluing players all the time but come on. We would be happy to get a decent bullpen arm for Crisp, who was a 6 win player last year, but Dejesus is worth a 2/3. If Dutton believes that, he should be fired. Please don't give me the salary junk. He makes about 10M for the next 3 years to Crisps 10 over the next 2. The extra year does not make up for the complete lack of production.
Dejesus is proven, hahah, classic. If proven to be average AT BEST, than sure.
Posted by: Ripwa | January 07, 2008 at 03:46 PM
Agree with everyone who thinks Dejesus is WAYYYY overvalued in this article. He's really nothing more than a nice 4th outfielder isn't he?? I don't get the hype on this guy.
Posted by: Brian | January 07, 2008 at 03:49 PM
Go name the Legit Centerfielders with an OPS of over .800 this year, and play great defense.
Because that's EXACTLY what DeJesus was in 2005-2006. He had a down year. He's definitely the one I'd choose of Teahen/DDJ to return to form next year.
Posted by: firesticks | January 07, 2008 at 03:51 PM
Dutton is exactly right. If they can't get a legitimate #3 starter for him, keep DeJesus. That would be selling low.
Posted by: firesticks | January 07, 2008 at 03:52 PM
he played 120 games each in 05/06..... so in his first FULL year, he dips to .720 OPS. seems kind of fishy to me.
Posted by: trober81 | January 07, 2008 at 03:54 PM
dejesus is considered a poor man's sizemore, which i agree with.
dejesus is like JD drew. there's far more talent than what we've seen so far and MLB scouts know it.
Olsen is actually a very good player to reflect dejesus' value.
also, i agree with the other poster that willingham is the kind of guy that will never be worth what he actually offers in a trade. that said, i dont think ucould get more than a double A reliever. MAYBE a single A lefty who tops out at 90 mph with a mid 3s ERA and a 1.5 to 1 K:BB ratio if you're lucky.
Posted by: bsox21 | January 07, 2008 at 03:57 PM
the extra month and a half killed him this year. look at his last two months of production. in '06, he played 10 games in april and may. in '05, he played 1 game in september. i just dont think a 28 year old outfielder who doesnt put up a full years worth of good stats is worth a young #2/#3 starter, but royals fans, i guess you can call me crazy.
Posted by: trober81 | January 07, 2008 at 03:59 PM
Here are some numbers for you to consider:
2005 - .293/.359/.445
2006 - .295/.364/.446
How much do you think a young CFer with a .800+ OPS with plus defense and plus speed is worth? Here are some more numbers for you:
2008 - $2.3M
2009 - $3.45M
2010 - $4.6M
2011 - $6M ($500K buyout)
In this market, that is dirt cheap. Given likely salary inflation over the next 4 years, that is ultra-cheap. He is one of the better CFer's in baseball (not elite, but very good), reliable, young and cheap. If you understand anything about baseball's economics, then you'll understand how high DeJesus's trade value is.
Posted by: NYRoyal | January 07, 2008 at 04:02 PM
"If you understand anything about baseball's economics, then you'll understand how high DeJesus's trade value is."
Agreed. It takes a New Yorker to bring logic to a discussion.
Posted by: bsox21 | January 07, 2008 at 04:05 PM
however nyroyal, i think ur undervaluuing olsen.
lefty power pitcher with big K potential who has had success in themajors (check his 06 stats. thats pretty for a very young pitcher). these are extremely tough to get in this market as well.
i think dejesus for olsen sounds abt right.
Posted by: bsox21 | January 07, 2008 at 04:07 PM
I would throw up if the royals gave away dejesus for the high tempered baby olsen.. he isnt that good.. he had success in 06 big deal.. he plays in the TERRIBLE NL Central.. and dejesus had a .800 ops in a great pitching AL central.. get real olsen would get just rocked in the al central i would be so mad
Posted by: Focs | January 07, 2008 at 04:10 PM
David Dejesus WARP:
2004 - 2.3
2005 - 3.9
2006 - 4.2
2007 - 2.1
Dejesus EqA:
2004 - .254
2005 - .276
2006 - .272
2007 - .250
Among all CFers, he ranked 20th in RARP. Wow, that is pretty damn impressive. He managed better numbers than the great Juan Pierre and Wily Taverez.
His EqA this season was .250 but the average CFer this season had an EqA of .263. But he puts up OPS of .800. Not many better hitting CFers....
Just to show how stupid this guy is, he says Teahan has a lot more to prove than Dejesus. While, if you look at VORP they had the same damn VORP last year. Teahan has played less games, thats about all Dejesus has over him as a proven commodity.
Posted by: Ripwa | January 07, 2008 at 04:10 PM
is anyone else thinking the cardinals and the royals could hook up? young starter? - anthony reyes; young corner OF with pop?- chris duncan; long term catcher?- bryan anderson. the cards could use teahan at 3rd
Posted by: bigmcq16 | January 07, 2008 at 04:13 PM
simple formula to baseball economics and trade value:
DDJ is worth what another teams GM will give. You can stow your statistical formulas, and your opinions of DDJ, Teahen and any other Royals players you feel the desire to trash.
If Dayton Moore can get a team to pay up a #2, or decent #3 then he will pull the trigger I'd bet. If not, DDJ is a Royal.
There's the only thing you rankheads need to know.
Posted by: bobhamelin | January 07, 2008 at 04:20 PM
why do people talk about VORP like a major league GM responsible for a multimillion dollar businesss isnt aware of this stat?
jus cuz some dork comes up with his/her version of perceived value, doesnt make it the end all.
GMs and scouts arent paid to look up stats and pay for the 1 with the best numbers. they are paid BIG BUCKS to find players who have MORE to offer than their numbers say they do.
GMs arent paid to find market value. they are paid to find UNDERVALUED assets. it takes more than VORP to find vlaue in this day and age in baseball.
ripwa, what did VORP tell you about john maine, oliver perez, gil meche and rafael betancourt prior to 07?
moore is the GM of the royals and I am not, because he can see the value in meche and i couldnt.
if they take olsen or dejesus, it wont be because of whta they've done. both GMs will only do it if they see star potential in the other.
Posted by: bsox21 | January 07, 2008 at 04:28 PM
Best post ever bsox21.
Posted by: firesticks | January 07, 2008 at 04:31 PM
I generally would agree with you, but you are talking about a 28 year old. He has been in the majors for 5 years. He has yet to put up a season that was much of anything.
So are you saying no stats matter? Are you saying something about Dejesus is undervalued? His FRAA last season was -14. He was only 9th CFers in FWS. He did manage to tied for fifth in RZR. Based on this, i don't see much about his D that is underrated.
Hitting, I already touched upon on RARP, VORP, EqA, and WARP. All of those are offensive stats or are heavily determined by offense.
So unless the undervalued thing is speed (which it could be) i guess all this is potential. He doesn't have rate stats that scream star. Below average ISOP, above average LD%, average GB rates, decent BB and K rates. Based on his rate stats, he isn't getting unlucky and based on his age no one should expect a big jump in his numbers. So i'm confused. Is it that Dejesus looks like he could be great? Wily Mo Pena looks like he could be the next Ryan Howard but was worth a AAAA player last season.
Obviously, I'm not as smart as Moore or any GM for that matter. I'm not arguing whether he could or couldn't get a #2/3 starter for Dejesus. I'm saying a 28 year old that has never had a WARP about 4.2 should not be worth a Rich Hill or Matt Garza or Wainwright or anyone #2/3 you can think of. There are tons of dumb GMs out there that will make trades like that, however, but that doesn't make it right.
Posted by: Ripwa | January 07, 2008 at 04:55 PM
What about Teahan for Jonathan Sanchez or Noah Lowry. Teahan would be a good pick up for the Giros. He could play first and the giants would have the option of signing Feliz to keep 3rd base warm for Angel Villanoa... Sounds good to me.
Posted by: Ohan | January 07, 2008 at 04:56 PM
Hey Focs "he plays in the TERRIBLE NL Central." When you try to say someone is terrible how about you know what division he plays in first. He plays in the NL East where Jose Reyes, Ryan Howard, Carlos Beltran, Brian McCann, Jeff Francouer, Jimmy Rollins, Aaron Rowand (last year), Carlos Beltran, Moises Alou, Ryan Zimmerman, Dmitri Young all played in last year. I would say thats better than the whole AL Central. Olsen isn't that bad, just look the whole Marlins staff did horrible last year does that mean they are all bad? No. You would be lucky to get a guy like Scott Olsen (who is only 23 years old) in a trade for DeJesus (who is 28 years old)
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | January 07, 2008 at 05:12 PM
I'll suggest it to you folks: Pierre and cash for Teahan. Seems a solution to what they're both looking for, Teahan playing 3B of course. This also frees up KC to trade DeJesus for pitching if so desired.
Posted by: Swtnes34 | January 07, 2008 at 05:46 PM
Swtnes34 this trade "Pierre and cash for Teahan." makes no sense at all for the Royals. The have Joey Gathright who is better and cheaper than Pierre. The Dodgers would probably have to pony up Jonathon Meloan to get Teahan.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | January 07, 2008 at 05:50 PM
Could these seemingly bewildered Royals fans please list some #2/#3 pitchers they feel would be a fair return for Dejesus.
I'd like to know so as a Sox fan I can prep myself for the glorious return we'll recieve from a likely Crisp trade.
Thanks
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | January 07, 2008 at 05:55 PM
Chuck James for DeJesus... this trade almost happened back in December. I can not imagine the Royals getting much more.
Posted by: wcg1380 | January 07, 2008 at 06:02 PM
Teahen would look great in a cubs uniform playing center. What do you think?
Posted by: uww1 | January 07, 2008 at 06:18 PM
Since when is Chuck James a bonafide #3 with #2 upside?
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | January 07, 2008 at 06:57 PM
I never said he was a bonafide #3, nor do I think DeJesus is worth any play who might be looked at as a possible #2. Chuck James however is what an average center fielder should be worth... a below average #3. Plus this is about the only trade I can see that would benifit both teams. Atlanta would have a center fielder who will not embarass them, but would need to bolster their rotation, most likley via the thin FA crop that remains. The Royals would get a guy who could provide some depth on the back side of the rotation.
Posted by: wcg1380 | January 07, 2008 at 07:09 PM
Hey Tim i like these Rumor Royalty interviews, there interesting. I know you said you were trying to get Nick Cafardo from the Boston globe how is that working out?
Posted by: Kramerica Industries | January 07, 2008 at 07:10 PM
Chuck James for DeJesus didn't "almost happen." Atlanta made that offer and Moore said "of course not." Trade talks between the teams when nowhere because Moore knows Atlanta prospects well and isn't high on James. So DeJesus is worth more to the Royals than Chuck James. No surprise there.
Posted by: NYRoyal | January 07, 2008 at 07:21 PM
Dejesus is definately being overrated. I think he is quite a good player, but a young #2/3 pitcher is exceptionally valuable. Young pitchers are probably the most valuable in the game, far more than a solid to above average in his prime center fielder. I think Chuck James would be a reasonably fair bounty. Other teams I can think of: Orioles (for Daniel Cabrera), Twins (for Slowey/Bonser/Baker), Pirates (for Maholm/Duke).
There really don't seem to be many teams shopping for a centerfielder at this point. Most teams either have a top prospect waiting in the wings and need a stopgap, or they have an established guy already locked in.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 07, 2008 at 07:28 PM
I think alot of people are undervaluing DeJesus and not really looking at the whole picture.
While I think people are undervaluing him a bit, all things being equal, he probably isn't worth a #2/3 starter straight up. But the point is all things aren't equal.
The Royals have absolutely no reason to trade DeJesus because he is locked up long term to a cheap contract, is a solid, if unspectacular player, and doesn't have anyone at the moment pushing him out of CF.
Since there isn't really a need to move him, the Royals are in the driver's seat as far as any trade with him goes and can play hard ball. They can demand a #2/3 starter, and, if a team gets desperate and has a center fielder go down, they could probably get one.
Its not a matter of Dutton or KC fans placing too much value on DeJesus, its just we realize that until there is a specific reason to move him, there is no point in not asking for a little bit more than he is worth.
Posted by: Slayer | January 07, 2008 at 07:30 PM
Dejesus is being vastly over rated if he's supposed to bring in a young cheap middle of the rotation starter. The guy screams "average". No power and no real speed. Take him out of CF and he's a well below average bat. Any team that's got a cheap middle of the rotation starter isn't going to give him up for a mediocre CF.
Joe Blanton is the type of player that I see falls under the young, cheap #2/#3 type pitcher and no way in hell does that equal David DeJesus. Chuck James is probably too much for the likes of David DeJesus.
I mean why trade for DeJesus, when Andre Either, a much better player, is probably available?
Posted by: Darin | January 07, 2008 at 07:37 PM
"what did VORP tell you about john maine, oliver perez, gil meche and rafael betancourt prior to 07?" - bsox21
WHAT?????
The problem with adding Perez and Meche to this arguement is that both were thought to have breakout potential. They had great "stuff", just couldn't put it together. Dejesus has never had breakout potential. Check out his minor league stats. He is what he is. A slow singles hitter that has to play CF to have any offensive value. As a corner outfielder he'd be well below average.
Another problem is all 4 of these guys you mentioned are Pitchers.
Last what in the world does Rafael Betancourt have to do with anything? The guy has a career 1.06 WHIP over 5 seasons. He's not average never has been...he's just really good. This seriously has me completely confused. Dejesus has been average for 5 seasons. Betancourt has been really good for 5 seasons.
How about next time you use some positional players to prove your point? Or at least leave relievers out of it.....
Posted by: Darin | January 07, 2008 at 07:50 PM
"I mean why trade for DeJesus, when Andre Either, a much better player, is probably available?"
Because Ethier isn't locked up to a cheap contract and isn't as good defensively in CF?
Granted, Ethier probably has a bit more upside, but as of right now DeJesus is still probably the better player and does have advantages other than pure offensive value.
Posted by: Slayer | January 07, 2008 at 08:33 PM
DeJesus is worth at least a young, cheap, reliable #3 starting pitcher. Do you realize that an average #3 SP amounts to an average, middle-of-the-road pitcher? Lieber and Silva are average #3 SP's. If you don't think DeJesus is worth a young Silva or Lieber, then you're nuts and you don't understand what is valuable in MLB nowadays.
Posted by: NYRoyal | January 07, 2008 at 08:40 PM
I agree with you completely NYRoyal. A number 3 starter isn't to much to ask for for a player of DeJesus's caliber. I am a Brewers fan and would love to see the Brewers package up a deal surrounding Capuano or Dave Bush for DeJesus. I think it would benefit both teams. Maybe even swap Bush and Gwynn Jr. for DeJesus and the Royals would get both a pitcher and a good CF prospect. People underrate Dave Bush. He had 12 wins last year.
Posted by: BrewCrew | January 07, 2008 at 08:59 PM
@ NYRoyal
DeJesus is 28. He has a career OPS below .800. He can't hit homers. He can't steal bases. And he's not a Gold Glove quality CF. No one's even bringing up the fact that DeJesus averaged about 132 games over the past 3 seasons, so he's not terribly durable.
And I'm not sure how to respond to the whole Silva/Lieber comment. But I'll give it a shot. Jon Lieber from his age 27 season (1st full season as a starter) until he turned 32 was much more valuable than a guy with a 102 career OPS+.
Young pitching, especially that of a #2/#3 quality cheap arm is much more valuable than league average production (both offensively and defensively) at CF. DeJesus isn't a difference maker. He's not a guy that would put someone over the edge. He's just filler.
Young cheap #2/#3 type pitchers - Micah Owings, Joe Blanton, Tom Gorzelanny, Jered Weaver, James Shields....none of those guys should be traded for DeJesus.
Please just show me how DeJesus isn't just average? You're talking about trading one of baseball's most precious commodities for a league average player.
Posted by: Darin | January 07, 2008 at 09:00 PM
Like I've suggested before Scott Olsen for DeJesus. Olsen is better than Chuck James at least.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | January 07, 2008 at 09:09 PM
Kramerica - I emailed Cafardo in November but unfortunately he did not reply. I am trying to decide how to handle teams where my Rumor Royalty nomination didn't reply. Seems that it would cheapen it to go to the second best guy, so I will probably just have to omit those clubs. (It would also kind of being insulting to the person to email a second choice). Thoughts?
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | January 07, 2008 at 09:38 PM
The problem with a Scott Olsen for Dejesus deal is that the Marlins have no need or desire for Dejesus. The Marlins aren't exactly a team loaded with pitching after dealing Dontrelle, so I think they would prefer to give him another shot and see if he can bounce back because he has a lot of potential.
Another reason why Dejesus for Olsen shouldn't even be brought up is a young man you might've heard of by the name of Cameron Maybin. Maybin, although probably not ready this year, is definately their center fielder of the future. His tools are unreal and he could become a superstar, so blocking him with a solid but nothing special guy like Dejesus would be just silly.
I hope we can end the Dejesus for Olsen discussion now.
Posted by: scribbletone | January 07, 2008 at 09:45 PM
scribbletone if you read the first comment on this you would also see that I've already said that. I said keep Maybin at his natural position at LF and have DeJesus in CF. Then I said either trade Willingham for SP or move him to 1B and get whatever you can for Mike Jacobs. Maybe someone like the Giants would give something bad/decent back. Rangers could be another team maybe.
Posted by: Barroid_Bonds | January 07, 2008 at 09:53 PM
Maybin + Willingham is > Maybin + DeJesus....you're talking about a 26 point difference in OPS+
And you want somebody of Maybin's calibur in CF...
And Jacobs would get absolutely nothing in return. Although I support Willingham to first to get rid of Jacobs, you then fill LF with a good bat, not a sub-par hitter in DeJesus. DeJesus in center, Maybin in left, and Willingham at first would be worse then having even an average offensive left fielder, Maybin in center, and Willingham at first.
Andddd you don't sell low on Scott Olsen. Trading him now would be selling him for pennies on the dollar. As others have said, he has very good potential, but he's coming off a horrible year...you don't cut your losses now, not with a 23 year old picther with good upside who has 4 more years of club control.
Posted by: Nny | January 07, 2008 at 11:39 PM
The problem with an Olsen for DeJesus trade is that Olsen is all potential and no results (or at least very little in the way or results). The failure rate for pitching prospects is very high. The Royals aren't going to trade DeJesus for a pitcher who has talent but hasn't proven himself at all. They traded two months of Dotel for Kyle Davies. They aren't going to trade 4 years of DeJesus for Olsen.
Posted by: NYRoyal | January 08, 2008 at 01:47 AM
Moore rejected the James trade so he obviously values DDJ more than a sub par NL #3. As a Royals fan it would be nice to see a return of several close to ready MLB prospects. For instance BAL matches up well with Reimold and Patton, Atl trading most of their arms last year makes a trade tough but Lillbridge would give an offensive upgrade at ss and then James maybe. Teahen would get a similar return but both players with a solid first half could increase their vaule coming off below avg years so DM is going to have to be impressed with an offer to pull the trigger.
Posted by: Billy Heywood | January 08, 2008 at 09:54 PM