![]() |
|
|
| |
« Brewers Rumors: DeJesus, Lofton | Main | Giants' Talks With Feliz Stall »
Kat O'Brien spoke to Hank Steinbrenner yesterday, and learned that the Yankees' take on Johan Santana has not changed. They're still in on him. One new tidbit: Hank said he wouldn't go past a five-year extension for Santana. Since he's already signed through 2008, an extension would go through 2013.
Keep in mind that Santana might not waive his no-trade clause if not given the contract he seeks.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c067ae970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hank: Yanks Would Not Exceed Five Years On Johan:


|
|
man so the yanks wont give him more than 5 yrs so i bet he still go there ... that means if johan will go to yanks and bo sox for 5 yrs ...the mets have to give him 6 or 7 to get him to wave ntc ,..... that would be messed up
Posted by: Dee Edge | January 09, 2008 at 08:14 AM
Wouldn't saying that be considered tampering?
Cashman must be counting the days until he is out of there. Do they even allow him to make decisions anymore?
Posted by: st1ckboy | January 09, 2008 at 08:17 AM
I actually believe this; it would be just the sort of mistake Hank would make.
Santana's agent said he's looking for 7/140. Hank will probably come back with 5/125... fewer years, but more per year.
The mistake is that the Yankees would get 2 fewer years for only 15 million or so less. 7.5m per year for Santana's age 35 and 36 seasons? Hell, even if he was league average those years, he'd be worth it. The risk is worth the extra money.
Posted by: metafrantic | January 09, 2008 at 08:37 AM
Tampering is a very fine line. As much as I hate hank I dont think this would qualify as tampering. I have heard (yet not from a reliable source) that Cashman will be out the door at the end of the 08 contract. If they are not going to let him do his job, there is no point in him being there. He has been doing his best to rebuild the 90's yankees team and hank is about to demolish all his work with one fell swoop.
However. my take on the situation as i've posted before, is that the yankees are not really interested in Johan. After signing Arod, they lose giambi after 08, they lose mussina i believe after 08, they lose pettite if he retires after 08, they just lost clemens, the pattern is they are trying to free up the payroll for a big signing in '09 for the new stadium. I dont believe they are actually interested, and i believe hanks mouth is proving it. He is trying his hardest to get the red sox to lose some players that are not disposable income. They have plenty of young starters, lester is not really a necessity to this red sox team. crisp is replaced by ellsbury. and lowrie and masterson are not MLB ready yet according to most sources. Ellsbury also is disposable as good as he is. There is an abundance of good outfielders between the current roster and their minor league system. dont forget if they hold crisp, they still possess the best defensive center fielder in the A.L. maybe short of torii hunter, and a great deal of speed to go along with an average bat. The yankees want the sox to up their deal and actually lose something in this trade. The yankees would be retarded to trade hughes. melky i can see being traded as the yanks have too many outfielders as it is, but hughes is a dominant young pitcher who has already shown before his injury that he has what it takes to perform in the Majors. keep in mind his 6 inning no hitter the day he got injured. If you dont think hes workin his ass off to get back in top form you are retarded. Hughes is a great asset to this organization. So as i said my prediction: This will go on until the twins have no time left to trade Johan (Johan said he will not waive his clause once the spring training begins) at which time Johan will be putting on a boston jersey. This new peice of info basically reiterates what i just said. The sox said they will give him 7 years 150 million if thats what he wants. why would he go to the yankees for 5 years 100 million? it just doesn't make sense.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | January 09, 2008 at 08:41 AM
And metafrantic i agree with you entirely. the whole situation doesn't make sense. hanks a fool lol.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | January 09, 2008 at 08:45 AM
Also pitcher prices are going to go up. they are saying that by 2010 we will see a pitcher (most likely josh beckett or someone of his caliber) ask for the same thing arod got 275 million for 10 years, and will probably get some offers. pitching is such a necessity and as is proven year after year hitting doesn't win u a championship. pitching does. Diamondbacks, red sox, marlins, were all pitching teams. that covers the last like 5 years?
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | January 09, 2008 at 08:47 AM
I think it's not tampering because they are involved in negotiations with Santana’s team?… It’s only tampering if the Twins file charges against the yankees with MLB. As long as there is a potential trade on the table between the two teams the Twins will not file charges.Hank needs to shut up and He's a bad businessman.
if what Hank is doing is tampering, the Mets did the same thing earlier this offseason when I heard a report on ESPN radio, where Minaya said that the Mets would offer a 7 year deal to Johan, even though they wouldnt go above 5 for Zito.
Posted by: Arcthelad09 | January 09, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Hank Hearts Cash
http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/yankees/ny-spyside075491318dec07,0,5598267.story
From Kat O'Brien -
"We haven't discussed [Brian Cashman's] extension yet, but he's part of the Yankee family and has been for 21 years. I don't see any reason to not continue that."
"He's busy, we're busy, there just hasn't been any detailed discussion about that," Steinbrenner said. "Is Brian's job on the line because of what the team does this year? No, that's sensationalism to say it's based on 2008 ... I'm very pleased with what Brian and Damon [Oppenheimer] and Mark Newman and all the scouts and people have done with the drafts, with the last three drafts."
Looks like Brian can write his own ticket when it comes to Hank.
http://www.nj.com/yankees/ledger/index.ssf?/base/sports-2/119959777672890.xml&coll=1&thispage=1
On his relationship with general manager Brian Cashman:
"(Brian) can be more conservative with our money than we are. He put back together our organization. I've always told him, there are things that have to be my final decision. But he's the general manager, and he has the right to try and talk me out of it. And he has talked me out of it."
Theo aka Flip-flopper, I thought He quit and then went back to Redsox in gorilla outfit so Redsox can finish Josh Beckett trade.. Gimme me break.
Posted by: Arcthelad09 | January 09, 2008 at 10:11 AM
hanks really not that smart for saying what he is willing to sign him too before he even gets a trade nailed down. his inexperience with all this power is certainly showing, i havent even heard from cashman this winter. hes threatening santana with a 5 year deal before he even has the window to negotiate. call me old fashioned, but i believe the details of a contract and/or trade should not be made public until the deal is finished, for two reasons, one it gives the player a one up, two it gives other teams a one up, because they both already know what you intend to do. someone get hank a running a major league baseball team for dummies book please
Posted by: 04Forever | January 09, 2008 at 11:31 AM
"Wouldn't saying that be considered tampering?"
Apparently not. I mean, seriously, can we give this a rest already? If an owner, team president, GM, etc, keeps making all of these public comments, and nobody that matters (ie -- someone from the commissioner's office) says anything about it, then it's not tampering. Besides, in this case, Hank's comments would tend to make Santana LESS likely to use his NTC to force a trade to the Yankees, not more.
Now, I suppose we can argue about whether this stuff should be considered tampering if that really makes us happy, but tampering isn't defined by us posting here on this board, or by sportwriters or bloggers. It's defined by MLB, and there's been no indication that MLB has any real problem with Hank's big mouth. Or Omar Minaya's. Or Arte Moreno's. Or even Scott Boras'.
Posted by: mac_1103 | January 09, 2008 at 12:20 PM
as far as tampering goes, i really dont care. if he tampered, does it matter right now? this certainly wont help him acquire santana. its almost like he is trying to undermind the twins by showing how strong his pimp hand is. technically its not tampering, hes just a whiner at this point since he wont come up with what the twins asked for.
Posted by: 04Forever | January 09, 2008 at 01:07 PM
I disagree with most of you. The yankees have money they can eat. They dont want to get stuck paying Johan 15 mil a year for his 36 and 37 seasons when he might possibly be breaking down. I think its a smart move. I will take Johan for 5/120 over 7/140 every day.
04forever, how does it make him a whiner? Is Theo Epstein a whiner because he doesnt want to give upp ellsbury and lester in the same deal? The Redsox wont come up with what the twins want either obviously, or a deal would be done. So are they whiners too? It is called being smart and not wanting to trade Hughes and sign a guy to a 7 year deal. And Hughes is better then any one guy that Boston is offering anyway, so it makes the decision harder.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 09, 2008 at 03:24 PM
"ask for the same thing arod got 275 million for 10 years, and will probably get some offers."
Any GM that gives a pitcher a 10 year contract, even at 10 mil per should be fired on the spot.
If any GM ever gives a pitcher 10/275, they should be hanghed in publick and pelted with tomatoes before they die. Seriously.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 09, 2008 at 03:28 PM
I love how people always say pitching wins championships, not hitting. You have to hit and pitch. The Padres and Dodgers both had sick rotations. They both didnt hit at all. They didnt make the playoffs. The Phillies won the division with no pitching, and the Rockies went to the world series with no pitching. Jaff Francis is a solid number 3 type of guy, but he was their best pitcher. Aaron Cook? Seriously? Boston can hit and pitch, and thats what you have to do. Pitching doesnt win championships, getting a group of pitchers hot at the right time wins championships. Its a crapshoot in the playoffs. Look at the Cards from a couple years ago. They had Carp and a bunch of stinky garbage in their rotation and proceeded to beat a Tiger team consiting of Bonderman, Verlander, Rogers, all who had big time seasons in 06. Not saying pitching doesnt help, but you still have to be able to hit, and you still need some guys to get hot and carry you through the playoffs.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 09, 2008 at 03:32 PM
nrmax88
the difference between the sox and the yankees is black and white.
first off, hank is a newly appointed whatever the hell he is, vice president i guess, theo is a general manager. theo cant/wont say anything because he knows better, its not good policy to run your mouth off. hank is acting like a pissed off teenager, telling the twins they offered the best deal, they can offer the most money, they tampered with this deal as much as up to 3 times with hanks loud mouth. hanks loud mouth makes him a whinner, the reason why he is whinning isnt really the point here. hes inpatient and is hurting the yanks chances by giving up that information, cashman must want to quit his job, considering he hasnt really had any say in any deal this year, hanks overruled him on everything anyway
Posted by: 04Forever | January 09, 2008 at 03:35 PM
hank kind of reminds me of the rock from wwe, he might as well end every sentence with "know your roll, and shut your mouth!"
Posted by: 04Forever | January 09, 2008 at 03:41 PM
Wow...a wrestling reference...time to take everthing he says serious...
Posted by: RedSoxHater3 | January 09, 2008 at 05:11 PM
Wow...a wrestling reference...time to take everthing he says serious...
Posted by: RedSoxHater3 | January 09, 2008 at 05:11 PM
And with a name like "RedSoxHater3" we can probably expect you to be unbiased and rational.
Posted by: gnick55 | January 09, 2008 at 06:05 PM