MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Fantasy      RSS Usage

« Carlos Pena Signs Three-Year Deal | Main | MLBTR Visitors By State »

Mariners Hesitant To Part With Jones For Bedard?

Jason Churchill has an update on his right-hand sidebar.  He now believes that the holdup in the Mariners-Orioles Erik Bedard discussions is Adam Jones.  Churchill's source thinks the Mariners aren't sure about giving him up.  Waffling on Jones would seem to jive with the Mariners' recent move of pulling him from winter ball for just a few days.

Maybe the Mariners have been reading blogs again.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c06c3c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mariners Hesitant To Part With Jones For Bedard?:

Comments

Is this not great? Everybody wants something for nothing. But the funny thing is......isn't the point to win a world series? Bedard gives the M's a legit shot right now. Jones does not. THE KEY IS PITCHING PEOPLE!!! Is Bavasi the worst or what?

In recent memory the Orioles have been usually the organization accused of being slow to move, waffling, and hesitant to even acknowledge trade talks. Though in my opinion, here the Orioles have been smart. They're wise to ply thru offers. It's the other teams who have been tentative and waffling.

At first the Reds supposedly wouldn't include Cueto at all, and, never offer two players the caliber of Bailey and Votto in the same deal, but they've been reportedly changed their minds. The Mets initially would not even consider Fernando Martinez and insisted on having Heilman in a deal to offset having to deal young prospects but now every Mets rumor has Fernando in and Heilman out. When this offseason began the Ms GM said Morrow was more or less untouchable, though lately they seem to be a little more open to that idea. To me as long as the trade partners are willing to up their offers, and the Orioles have time, the Orioles can just entertain offers up until July 31 (and perhaps beyond).

Basically speaking whoever deals for Bedard has to be 100% committed to winning today. If there's even an ounce of thinking "we MIGHT be able to make it in our division," then I think that's the difference in a trade NOT happening. To the Orioles dismay their prospective trade partners either sit in a competitive division or lack the prospects. I personally think the Dodgers was the best fit for the Orioles because of the wealth and high competition of their division combined with their plethora of talent.

ok....what about morrow butler tillman sherril clement and truinfel?

I think pulling the trigger on this trade is a huge decision on the part of the Mariners that essentially boils down to compete now or compete later. Adding Bedard to the rotation to pair with Felix Hernandez will produce one of the best 1 two punches in baseball for at least Bedard's remaining arbitration years. Adam Jones, from what I hear is a budding superstar which could help a team for many years.

If Bedard is willing to sign an extension, I would do it if I were the mariners GM. If he is not willing I would assess the clubs chances of seriously competing against the Red Sox, Yankees, Angels and Cleveland and the newly revamped Tigers.

I do not believe the addition of bedard will allow them to overtake the Angels in the division and it may make them equal if not better that than Cleveland and the yankees for the wildcard..... Tough decision, would not want to be the mariners GM on this one.

I also forgot to mention now this possible recent news on the Ms. Suddenly they're not sure or not willing to deal Adam Jones at all. If that's so, then all Bedard trade talks is over in Seattle.

And, as far as the Orioles being able to sit back and "entertain offers," I didn't mean to say that they should not trade Bedard. Just the option of being able to sit back plays heavily into their favor. They're not going to have to grant some kind of discount like the Twins might because Johan is going to be costly in prospects, expensive in contract, and under a Free Agency clock. Bedard is cheap in contract and isn't under a Free Agency countdown so he will cost more in prospects.

I love it how every proposal for Bedard from every team has started out with premier top prospect deals and slowly devolved to quantity offers.

thing i dont get is, this guy jones maybe a good or even great player in the future, but he's not, erick bedard is, this guy can shut any team down.

if the mariners get him they have a good shot.

He might be able to "shut teams down" but he's yet to have consecutive healthy seasons and the next time he pitches 200 innings in a year will be the first.

I'll put it simply.

NO ADAM JONES IN A DEAL MEANS NO ERIK BEDARD.

Period.

Why? It is the one position that the Orioles covet and the Mariners can fill now with a potential star.

Clement is a fine catcher, but the Orioles have Ramon Hernandez now and Matt Weiters in about two years.

Triunfel, for all the hype, is at single A. And he wasn't exactly tearing the cover off the ball. He's all projection.

Morrow doesn't fill the Oriole need.

Balentein? Don't kid yourself to think he is the equal of Adam Jones.

Butler? Tillman? Both final pieces of a deal, not major parts themselves.

What the Orioles NEED in a deal for Bedard is either an elite CF or an elite ss ready to play now.

Perhaps Seattle decides to include Jones in a deal. Perhaps Cincinnati parts ways with Jay Bruce. Perhaps St. Louis can find some other pieces to put together with Colby Rasmus. The Mets don't have enough to make the trade, so let's not even talk about them with Bedard anymore.

Point being Bedard goes nowhere without a star CF coming back. MacPhail should and will hold off any trade of Bedard until his demands are met.

True that he hasn't pitched more than 200 IP. Though if he didn't have some blemishes we'd probably not be hearing the possibility of him being traded as much and/or the cost in prospects would be that much higher. The Os need to rebuild but I am not sure how much of a that compels them to deal him if he's a lock to be great. A legitimately great pitcher can stay great at Bedard's age for the next decade. That is surely enough of a time table for the Orioles to restock. The Os aren't the Twins and do have the funds to sign players.

Another caveat to this is that Bedard has never pitched on a competitive team expected to win. At an early age he suffered a potential career-threatening injury before it even got started. Since then I think he's always measured things in a longterm career context. In Baltimore every now and then, whispers arise as to how much he's willing to lay it on the line for a losing team. You can argue that point however you want but such a formula might have contributed to times when he's opted to stay out of the rotation to make absolutely sure he was healthy enough to pitch again. Such a formula would contribute to his lack of 200 IP seasons. And, taht formula would be completely different if he's pitching for a contender.

This is not a compete now vs. compete later decision. It's compete now vs. compete NOW and compete later. The Ms shouldn't even trade Adam Jones for Erik Bedard straight up.

Basura,
This is the typical nonsense I've heard about Bedard. "He hasn't pitched 200 innings yet, so he isn't that valuable".

In 2006, he pitched 196.3 innings. In 2007 it was 182 innings before he was shut down because the Orioles weren't going anywhere.

So, the 200 inning argument about Bedard boils down to 21.6 innings, which is 5.7% of the innings he did pitch.

Funny how people love to point out 5% but chose to totally ignore the other 95%.

FYI, no Mariner pitcher pitched over 200 innings in 06 and 07 either.

Basemonkey I have to go with your point on the Dodgers. A Lowe, Penny, Berard, Billingsley and Kudoa could be a real nice starting 5 that would not have to necessarily dismantle itself in 2 seasons. Would leave Loaiza and Schmidt for expensed depth and/or to spun to other teams. I hope it never comes to pass. ( Rival team. I hope you understand.)

As for the type of offers the O’s are getting I wonder if they are asking bidders for the best offers in each category. (Higher ceilings types with few players and mass quantity but lower ceiling types.) They are in a position were either type of move would make sense.

The way this Bedard thing is going, it should be interesting to see how this plays out and where he ends up. IMO the O'S are playing the Reds and Mariners against each other to get the best deal. Who can blame them?

Has anyone heard anything from Bedard in terms of signing long term if he were to go to Seattle or Cincy?

If the FO was reading blogs, I want to know the blog that they read that they were like "Oh maybe we shouldn't trade Jones!" I would spam that blog with PORN. I fucking hate that this most likely won't happen now.

Or quite possibly the Orioles are over-valuing Bedard. He had a good season last year, but he is not Santana....yet they are looking for a Santana like package.

The Red Sox and Yankees have backed off on sending that level of talent for Santana. What do you think that will do for this potential deal?

Its not losing Jones that worries me. Its the fact that Baltimore wants 3 other legit prospects ON TOP OF Jones.

Pass.

In our situation, Jones can be replaced with Balentien since he will be somewhat wasted in RF. Losing a good chunk of the talent it took 4 years for this team to build isn't worth sacrificing for two years of Bedard. Especially when we don't have the offense to be a legit contender in the AL anyway.

thr33niL -

Adam Jones is replaceable with Balentien, and he'll be damn good.

Triunful is at least 3 or 4 years from the majors. There is no damage done WHATSOEVER.

Sherrill came into his own WAYYY too late.

Morrow is expendable if we get Bedard and resign him.

Tillman, again, is 3 or more years from the majors.

baseballismylyf4....

The very points you make about Triunfel and Tillman, are exact evidence as to why we should look at not trading them.

Triunfel is presently a shortstop, but is projected as a future third baseman. Beltre is only under contract through 2009. Who replaces him?

Tillman will be coming into his own right about the time that 1) Batista's contract is up, Washburn will be gone, Silva towards the end of his contract and Felix about ready to file for free agency.

Balentien will be good...as will Jones. Ibanez will be 36 this season and Ichiro is getting older as well..

OMD...

If Beltre performs like 2006 and 2007, including a GOld Glove, I believe he is deserving of a contract (this is not solely based on the gold glove). Tillman needs a lot of time. Not just conveniently when the contacts end, but I mean, a lot of time.

Honestly, I think Balentien will be better than Jones. A little birdie on my shoulder tells me this, and I usually get verbally abused for saying it, but I think Balentien is better.

I think Balentien's bat has as much upside as Jones' if not more. He has more natural power than Jones. Jones is the more naturally athletic of the two and plays a premium position. Thats the difference between them.

I think Seattle sees this and if Baltimore just wanted Jones plus maybe one other guy, they might do it. I think whats holding things up is Baltimore wanting a mint of talent along with Jones.

I've said it before. Triunfel is a teen phenom and will be in AA this year. I can see this kid being ready to step in at 3rd when Beltre comes up for free agency.

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


MLBTR Features



Recent Posts



Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Fantasy     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.