![]() |
|
|
| |
« Brad Wilkerson Signs With Mariners | Main | Dallas McPherson Signs With Marlins »
UPDATE, 1-31-08 at 5:10pm: Jon Heyman says the Mets are offering a six-year, $129MM extension starting with the '09 season. Including his '07 salary that would amount to seven years and $142.25MM. Santana's people want to get the total up around $170MM. Less than 5% of MLBTR readers believe this won't get done.
UPDATE, 1-31-08 at 11:31am: ESPN's Jayson Stark says contract talks will spill over onto Friday, the deadline day. Chances of failing to reach an agreement are "remote." For now it appears that the Mets want the sixth year as a vesting option and Santana's people want it guaranteed.
Stark also adds that Kyle Lohse may not be completely out of the picture for the Mets, even if they do sign Santana.
FROM 1-31-08 at 8:54am:
There's still the little matter of the Mets signing Johan Santana to perhaps the largest deal ever for a pitcher. Let's explore.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c07dad970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Santana Extension Talk:


|
|
Please let this turn out like the Mike Hampton signing.
Posted by: Land-Man | January 31, 2008 at 09:00 AM
I voted that Santana will sign for 5yrs/80m. That way, Indians can afford Sabathia. (I know that's not going to happen, but I can dream, can't I? That's all we can do in Cleveland, just dream we can keep CC.)
Posted by: mharr | January 31, 2008 at 09:04 AM
The track record for this stuff is BAD. Zito, Hampton, and Brown being the only pitchers to get big long-term deals don't make a good case for Santana getting one.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | January 31, 2008 at 09:20 AM
assuming the mets fail to sign santana to an extension, would that make the them the ultimate loser? (assuming that they don't get the ring either)
Posted by: 510hope | January 31, 2008 at 09:27 AM
The package the Mets gave up almost makes them the winner EVEN if they only get one year of service from Johan.
They'll lock him up long term though - something like 6YR/$130M. The track record on these contracts for SP's is verrrry shoddy. If you had to peg anyone to buck the trend, it'd have to be Johan, no?
Posted by: PhilsPhan | January 31, 2008 at 09:35 AM
unfortunately, they are going to have to sign him no matter what. they have to save face or the media is going to have a hay day with minaya and co.
Posted by: jwilsondsm | January 31, 2008 at 09:37 AM
I don't think it's fair to put Santana in the same group as Zito, Hampton, and Brown. We're talking about the best pitcher in baseball right now. He's way better than Zito, Hampton, or Brown were when they got their deals.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | January 31, 2008 at 09:38 AM
This negotiation may or may not take the full 72 hours, but only the Mets will be negotiating. Santana's agent says "we'll take 6 years at $140m+ or 7 years at $165m+", then sits back for 72 hours until the Mets choose which package to sign. The Mets can go back and counteroffer all they want, but there is absolutely no incentive for Santana to come down at all. It will be a PR disaster for Minaya not to get the deal done and everyone at the table knows it.
Posted by: JimCrikket | January 31, 2008 at 10:19 AM
I don't know how Zito and Hampton got so much money, but Brown was closer to Johan than you think. I would have given him the Cy over Glavine in 1996. He was definitely one of the best pitchers in baseball in the mid to late 90's. The problem with Brown wasn't his ability, but his age (34 or so at the time) while Johan is only 29.
Most pitchers, however, will go through some sort of injury during their careers. Johan is due for one, I suppose. The Braves and the Phillies are certainly hoping for it.
Posted by: Victor | January 31, 2008 at 10:27 AM
JerseyMetFan: Not saying Santana's incapable of bucking the trend or that he's not better than those 3 guys, but while Zito just failed to perform, Hampton and Brown got hurt. I know the Mets HAVE to sign him, but 7 years is such a huge gamble on a player whose livlihood relies on 1 arm that it's a massive gamble, and the track record of these deals isn't helping the odds.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | January 31, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Can anyone explain to me the reason why Johan is not just playing out this last season with the Twins, who would definitely be a contender with him, and then just take himself to free agency where several teams will be bidding against one another for him? Only real good reason I can think is if Santana knows something about his health that others do not....
Posted by: SoleMaverick | January 31, 2008 at 10:37 AM
To SoleMaverick's comment: Santana knows that he is at peak value right now. If he remained with the Twins and had an off year, he would still have had considerable value as a free agent at the end of '08, but perhaps not quite as much as now. And, even Santana has been very durable, he knows that a pitcher (or any player) is just one pitch or one at bat away from a major injury. This is the best time for him to get maximum value.
Santana made it very clear that there were only a couple of teams that he was interested in playing for. The Twins had already made their best offer so it left the New York teams and Boston as the only teams he was interested in. There was never going to be much a bidding war for Santana as a free agent since there were essentially only three teams that he wanted to play for that could afford him.
Posted by: bernie | January 31, 2008 at 10:52 AM
In addition to bernie's comments, signing now is to Santana's advantage for two other reasons.
First, not only could he have an "off year" (or rather another off year... last year was "off" statistically by his standards), he could also get hurt. If it's a serious injury, he could end up collecting his $13 million and calling it a career.
Second, if he plays out 2008 and files for FA, he'd likely be going on the market at the same time as Sabathia. So while there may be more teams willing to negotiate, there will also be some competition.
He might have played out the season rather than taking a low ball Minnesota offer (imagine 100 million/5 years being considered "low ball". ugh), but he's definitely got incentive to get a deal done now.
Posted by: JimCrikket | January 31, 2008 at 11:03 AM
"Can anyone explain to me the reason why Johan is not just playing out this last season with the Twins, who would definitely be a contender with him, and then just take himself to free agency where several teams will be bidding against one another for him? Only real good reason I can think is if Santana knows something about his health that others do not...."
He's healthy. Sorry....as to why he is not on the Twins?
=======================
"These were Johan Santana's words Tuesday after the non-waiver trade deadline passed without another trade: "I'm not surprised. That's exactly how they are. That's why we're never going to go beyond where we've gone."
The Twins acquired two minor league prospects for Castillo, saved $2 million in payroll and did nothing to bolster this year's chances.
"It's not just about hope," Santana said. "In a realistic world, you have to really make it happen and go for it.
"You always talk about future, future. ... But if you only worry about the future, then I guess a lot of us won't be part of it," Santana said.
The two-time Cy Young Award winner wasn't smiling.
"Why waste time when you're talking about something that's always going to be like that? It's never going to be beyond this point. It doesn't make any sense for me to be here, you know?"
Torii Hunter will be a free agent at season's end. Santana and Joe Nathan will be free agents after 2008. Asked what message Ryan's latest decisions had sent to that trio, Santana continued firing.
"I've been here for eight years, and I've seen a lot of those kind of things," he said. "I've seen a lot of those guys [like Castillo] come in and leave. [The decision makers] don't care. They always talk about caring about it; I don't think they care.
"Because if you're always talking about having young players that's the philosophy the team has, and I respect all that but it's been proven that it's not enough to go all the way to the World Series.""
=======================
That was last year. He did not want to be there at all and said trade me now.
Posted by: themetros | January 31, 2008 at 11:08 AM
themetros is correct... Santana didn't want to remain in Minnesota.
But he's not gone because he demanded to be traded now. He didn't have that ability. If the Twins wanted to keep him through 2008, that's where he would have been pitching.
For the many reasons stated above, Santana has plenty of incentive to get his deal done now, rather than wait, and that's why he told the Twins he would waive his NTC if they could make a deal to certain teams.
He's not going to playing out his final contract year in Minnesota because the Twins saw the benefit of getting something for him now, rather than a couple of draft picks next year. They ended up with less than they could have gotten in December, but I'll still take those 4 guys over a lame-duck year of Santana and 2 draft picks.
Cleveland, however, appears to have taken the other fork in the road and is willing to take their chances with Sabathia in 2008 and watch him leave in return for picks next season.
Posted by: JimCrikket | January 31, 2008 at 11:31 AM
Just read the Stark article.
It's hard for me to imagine (a) Santana agreeing to a 5 yr + an option year deal; and (b) that the Mets would even think he might. They had to know it was going to take a 6 year guaranteed contract to do this deal going in. If not, they shouldn't have even been in the trade discussions in the first place.
Posted by: JimCrikket | January 31, 2008 at 11:46 AM
I'm okay with six years guaranteed for Santana. He'd be 34 in the last year of the contract, which isn't ancient, and left-handed power pitchers generally age pretty well. Of course any pitcher is an injury risk but Santana has shown excellent durability so far. His change-up is so devastating that he could survive losing a few MPH off his fastball and still be a fine pitcher. But the beauty part is that he still has the sick fastball and I'm expecting him to dominate the National League for at least a few seasons.
Posted by: JK47 | January 31, 2008 at 11:50 AM
Yeah, it has been no secret he wanted six so it should not exactly be a surprise. But the business of wanting a bonus to boost his 2008 salary is absurd. Why should they do that AND give him $20+ per year over six years.
As for him demanding a trade, he could demand one. They of course did not have to placate him and do it, but he could demand whatever he wants.
I'm pretty sure he wanted nothing to do with being a Twin this year and probably told them he would use his veto mid-year as well pretty much forcing his hand.
RE: CC, Cleveland actually has some more cash than Minnesota so I think they have the ability to sign him much easier than the Twins could have signed Johan.
Whether they will or not is another debate.
Posted by: themetros | January 31, 2008 at 11:59 AM
Well, yeah... we can all demand anything we want... just sayin' contractually he was bound to Minny for 08, regardless of whether he wanted to remain a Twin or not.
As for Cleveland, I don't know how much cash they have but they've generally been running below Minnesota in payroll recently and have not shown a willingness to spend huge amounts to keep their Free Agents. Hard to imagine them paying one guy 20-25% of their payroll budget, but who knows? Maybe.
The alleged threat by Santana not to waive his NTC during the year would have been interesting to see how it played out. If July rolled around and a team really needed him and the Twins weren't contending, would he turn down a chance to make a name for himself in a playoff run? I dunno. He'd still be FA after '08 so being a 3 month rental wouldn't hurt his market (unless he folded under the pressure maybe).
It's a moot point now, I guess... unless the Mets really do blow this thing and fail to sign him. Hard to imagine that happening, though.
Posted by: JimCrikket | January 31, 2008 at 12:07 PM
"would he turn down a chance to make a name for himself in a playoff run?"
It seems elementary, but Delgado did just that. He turned down a shot to go to contender his last year in Toronto. Some people don't want to shuffle around mid year and are just really fickle. Johan also had that as his leverage in that spot and the Twins could have called his bluff (assuming he actually said that, which is just pure conjecture on my behalf).
The Indians have pocketed a ton of cash over the years so they truly differ from the Twins there. About $130m in recent years of total profit. That is where they significantly diverge from the Twins who have not been nearly as profitable and why I think they are in a better position to actually retain CC than most people think.
Posted by: themetros | January 31, 2008 at 12:21 PM
I heard Santana and his agent wants 6 years $155 million dollars. I hope Mets sign and give Johan want He wants.
Posted by: Arcthelad09 | January 31, 2008 at 01:25 PM
It'll be interesting to see what effect the Johan signing has on the Mets ability to sign their younger players to future contracts. That's a lot of money committed to one player.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | January 31, 2008 at 01:32 PM
Reyes and Wright are both already locked up though. The only guy that will be getting a big raise in the next couple of years is John Maine. And 7 years scares the crap out of me. Atleast if you give him 7 years frontload the hell out of this contract so that if he starts to break down in years 6 and 7 then atleast he wont be the Mets highest paid player.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 31, 2008 at 02:13 PM
Right. Reyes and Wright are locked up and there is only Maine to worry about. I would love Perez back, but that might be a sretch given Boras is going to peddle him around big time.
The real big key here is that Fernando and Pelfrey need to pan out. Pelfrey needs to be a league average pitcher and Fernando needs to contribute as well to give some wins on the cheap. If not, they are going to have a bitch of a time managing that payroll.
This draft is going to be huge for them. There are some interesting players on the farm, but nothing out of the ordinary or particularly close outside of a reliever or two.
They need to knock this next draft out of the park.
Posted by: themetros | January 31, 2008 at 02:29 PM
Something in me wants to believe that Omar will lock up Perez to a 4/55 sort of deal during ST. Hopefully Oliver remembers who found him, gave him a shot after everybody thought he was a busted prospect. I would have liked too see PErez get locked up before the Johan trade, because the salary that Santana gets will not do anything to help to keep Perez here at some sort of value. Omar has also hinted at the idea that the Mets will basically tell the slotting system to eff* off this year. And finally.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 31, 2008 at 03:00 PM
I will forever be skeptical until that happens. With all the cash they are spending on Johan, I could see them pull an about face on the slot/draft thing.
They need to spend big on this draft because right now, things are ugly. Of course I am not complaining per se, I've been insanely excited about Johan coming to New York. Merely pointing out they need to make sure this draft is remniscent of the BoSox '05 draft. They need to have a big one and stick to what they have saying they would do.
Posted by: themetros | January 31, 2008 at 04:07 PM
Agreed the mets need a huge draft this year to rebuild that farm system. I hope there are some very good position players available at our picks.
I also hope perez wants to stay and gives us a discount. same with pedro. If the two of them dont do that, we could use some help with our rotation AGAIN. Maine is due for a promotion, but not a huge one. He will be on a discount for years to come.
As for Johan, some have talked about a 7th year. It seems that is out of the question, as the mets dont want the sixth year guaranteed. I am sure this well end up at 6/135 range.
GO METS
Posted by: Fish&Mets | January 31, 2008 at 04:26 PM
honestly, come on already. give the damn guy what he wants. you knew what you were getting into, and if a jackass like zito can pull down 120MM this guy certainly deserves a lot more. it's absurd, but it's becoming the reality. don't cry about 25 million when you're receiving the best pitcher in baseball. you're a big market team, and you can wipe your *** with that kind of money. let everybody else in the league move on.
Posted by: msk86 | January 31, 2008 at 05:22 PM
170!! damn Johan, whats the deal? i say we give him a 23 million dollar team option for the seventh year with no buyout... would that make you happy johan?
Posted by: Fish&Mets | January 31, 2008 at 05:38 PM
That's too much money...even for Santana. Even for an everyday player its too much, but for a pitcher that's even worse. Pay all that for a guy that will play every 5th day. He's great, but not worth it. What the Mets are offering is more than enough, Santana is just getting greedy. I don't care either way who gets him, but hopefully the Mets say no.
Posted by: DLadd813 | January 31, 2008 at 05:43 PM
170 mil. Screw you Johan. And Johans agents. Not even a free agent go back to Minnesota and play your last year and then go too free agency if its only about the money. I hope Omar tells him and his agents to take a walk. Havent really wanted him since this whole thing started. How does Alex Rodriguez take so much heat for opting out during the world series, but nobody mentions whata little diva Johan is. He has been complaining like a little girl all year, then he holds his team hostage all winter, then he demands the biggest contract ever while he isnt even on the open market.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 31, 2008 at 05:48 PM
Dont get me wrong, I will be cheering for him if/when this deal is finalized, but I would prefer to give him back to Minnesota and take our guys back. I want nothing to do with a 7 year contract at 170 mil, or even a 7 year contract at 140 mil for that matter, even without giving up the farm.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 31, 2008 at 05:49 PM
Dladd, I agree 100 percent. Are you a met fan or a casual observer?
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 31, 2008 at 05:50 PM
Why can't anything be simple?
Posted by: themetros | January 31, 2008 at 06:17 PM
What were the Mets thinking? Zito money is the starting point of negotiations. They aren't even in the same world so it's reasonable to assume that Johan is going to ask for a nice bump over Zito.
This could be a tragic blunder if the deal doesn't go through because of the Mets squabbling over a few million/year. They stole Johan from the Twins and now they don't want to pay him. Wow. And to think, I was just praising Omar if a few posts back.
Posted by: bjsguess | January 31, 2008 at 06:40 PM
I also think that Johan has virtually no incentive to settle in his price. Worse case scenario he goes back to the Twins. He puts up his typical year and hits FA.
Then you have the Yanks, Sox, and everyone else bidding because all it's going to take is cash. If the Sox or Yanks were willing to give up 4-5 players + sign him to a big contract how much more would he be worth without any players involved?
Another typical year from Johan and you are looking at an 8/$200 deal.
Posted by: bjsguess | January 31, 2008 at 06:45 PM
Jo Gohan!
Posted by: HouseThatKirbyBuilt | January 31, 2008 at 07:07 PM
I dont get why Zito has to set the market. Everybody already knows what a bad signing that is already, and it has only been a year. How come Zambrano's contract isnt setting the market?
Its like okay, what should Omar say....."Okay man, Zito set the market last year (only Zambrano is similar because he was not a free agent and neither is Johan), and I know that it was an incredibly bad move, but I will just bump that price up by like 6 mil a year to get you signed after I just gave up my whole farm system".
Give him the 6/130, even that is too much. If Johan is greedy and demands more, tell him to stop watching Buster Olney so much and send him on his way. Spend that money on keeping locking up Perez and eventually Maine. How would it be Omar's fault anyway. He got the guy everybody wanted to NY. If they cant hammer out a deal, most likely it is because Wilpon doesnt want to pony up. I dont even blame him.
"Another typical year from Johan and you are looking at an 8/$200 deal."
Good for him then. Let some other idiot make that mistake. Maybe he goes back to Minnesota and blows out his arm.
Posted by: nrmax88 | January 31, 2008 at 07:42 PM
I say Johan gets 6 years, 150MM plus a NTC and 20MM incentives. He should demand that. He has all the leverage because he nows the Mets wont let him go back to the Twins. Even if they do, he could get that amount from some team next offseason. Its a win-win situation for Santana.
Posted by: Joe | January 31, 2008 at 07:48 PM
As a fantasy baseball champion, I'd take Peav-Dog over Johan.
Posted by: HouseThatKirbyBuilt | January 31, 2008 at 08:03 PM
I honestly can't believe this extension wasn't done minutes after the trade... That is astonishing to me... Minaya has all of New York on this bi-polar ride... If he doesn't get this deal done it will sum up his legacy in New York... I actually am all for the Mets doling out millions upon millions to a pitcher like Santana.... They'll soon be considered " the lil Yankees"... lol... They sure are spending like it and where is it getting them ???
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 31, 2008 at 08:32 PM
If I were Johan, I wouldn't be asking for 170MM.... I would be asking for 200MM..... You know why... Because I can ....
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 31, 2008 at 08:34 PM
There could be another reason that Santana is looking for such a large payout. He just might not be that sold on playing for the Mets. 30 extra million might help make it up to him for not going to the team he really wanted to go to.
Posted by: THE Old Goat | January 31, 2008 at 08:51 PM
Don't forget Clemens' 28 million for one year deal as well. That helps set a standard.
Once a price tag like that is out there, all other deals will be judged by it.
Posted by: THE Old Goat | January 31, 2008 at 09:04 PM
"There could be another reason that Santana is looking for such a large payout. He just might not be that sold on playing for the Mets. 30 extra million might help make it up to him for not going to the team he really wanted to go to."
Are you serious?
To quote Torii Hunter:
"They’re going to absolutely love him in New York…I know he’s happy, too, because HE REALLY WANTED TO GO TO THE METS. He’s always wanted to swing the wood. He can hit…So I don’t know who’s happier, Johan, the Mets, or everyone in the American League because they don’t have to face him anymore.”
Posted by: PDubs | January 31, 2008 at 09:25 PM
Yeah, he clearly stated he wanted to play with the Mets. Obviously if he didn't he could have used his no trade clause.
Posted by: fitz | January 31, 2008 at 09:50 PM
@ Fitz and PDubs
Public Relations people are masters of stirring up schemes for getting the most money for their clients... What is Johan going to do if he is trying to gauge his worth through the Mets ??? No, I really don't want to play for the Met's but i'll see what they'll pay me anyway... Obviously, it's going to be all roses until the benjamins are on the table... Talk is cheap... I wouldn't believe a word that you hear coming out of Johan's mouth or anyone elses mouth at this point...
Posted by: allabouthephils | January 31, 2008 at 10:21 PM
So Johan Santana called Torii Hunter and told him to say that to reporters????
Lol.
Posted by: PDubs | January 31, 2008 at 10:31 PM
ok first of all, Torri Hunter didnt say that, his agent did. second of all johan said pretrade he wants to be on the east coast and in the NL... The mets fit those perfectly. he is simply going for all the money he can get.
There is no way that he will get 8 years 200 mil as a free agent. First of all to quote another post he is a "diva". He only wants to play on the east coast, he would have vetoed trades to either LA teams. The free agent race would be similar to his trade market. So there would only be about 3 or 4 teams bidding. I am willing to bet the final bid would be similar to what is is going to cost the mets to sign him.
I was so happy at the time of the trade, and if we hadnt signed Johan to a 6 year 130 or 140 mil extention, I would be very angry at Omar and be cheering for a new GM next year. However, in light of things, i have omar's back if we dont sign johan and send his greedy ass back to the twins. seriously, if we sign him in the open market we would pay 6 150 w/o the prospects, well worth waiting.
Posted by: Fish&Mets | February 01, 2008 at 12:42 AM
Clemens didnt get a one year 28 million deal, he got a 14 million dollar deal for half a year. Much different
Posted by: Fish&Mets | February 01, 2008 at 12:45 AM
Torri Hunter didn't say that??? Then Bob Nightengale from USA Today should be fired.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2008-01-29-twins-mets-santana_N.htm
You have no idea what you're talking about. The Mets are built to win now, Santana makes them the odds on favorites in the NL. We gave up a crap bouquet of prospects.
I haven't seen ONE baseball analyst knock this trade for the Mets, but clearly you know better.
Wait another year for Johan? Thats the most asinine thing I've ever heard of. He's going to make us win and win now.
Posted by: PDubs | February 01, 2008 at 12:57 AM
Zambrano just isn't comparable. The presumption is that when a player resigns with their team there is some sort of home town discount. We see that situation happen time and time again.
I agree that Zito isn't a good comparable either. It's a complete insult to even mention Johan's name in the same paragraph as Barry. Regardless of whether it was a "smart signing" or not, Zito did set the market price for a premiere FA pitcher (again - using premier in the loosest of terms).
As for Johan wanting to play on the East Coast ... who really knows if that is true or not. As others have pointed out, Johan has an agent and marketing team behind him. They say (or have Johan say) whatever is necessary to maximize their client's earning potential. I think it is quite a stretch to suggest that Johan is just dying for a chance to join the boys in NY.
Posted by: bjsguess | February 01, 2008 at 01:11 AM
nrmaxx I would like to be the first to lay down a world series wager, purely due to this trade. I feel the need to crush the dreams of the entire burough of queens. The Phillies will make the wild card, David Wright will propel the Mets into a World Series appearance with walk off home run in the bottom of the 9th game game 5 of the NLCS, and you can ride a wave of emotion into the world series. It will only be appealing if you actually feel you have a chance, Billy Wagner comes in and David Ortiz or Manny or whoever crush it beyond all reason and you feel like some serious part of your life has been stolen from you. Basically the point is I'm willing to lay down a wager that the 86 WS will be repeated but in reverse, right now on the dawn of February 1st.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | February 01, 2008 at 02:26 AM
TMACNTN, Oh you stupid little boy, you f#cked with the wrong bull. You see I was away living life when i came back to see you runnin your mouth on everything. The fact that you are responding to any and every post up here on the boards says it all. Go hit up your parents for them ten stacks, cuz I got a bet sayin that you've never been with a girl. Let alone a hot one! You are my favorite kind of internet dweller, the one who hides behind that keyboard in the vast electronic anonymous wasteland. I will hunt you down on every board just to see if you will back up YOUR BIG MOUTH. How you gonna pretend you have a girl, when you dont even have time for a job cuz youre up here trying to pick internet fights? Which no doubt, comes from a hard day of getting picked on in real life. That goattard thing you came up with was real cute too, sounds like you've definitely grown into your big boy pants. I'm gonna post this on all the latest boards, so everyone can watch and see you puss out on your bad ass challenge.. You post up to me again and I'll give you my e-mail. We'll start from there. God willing, you'll be from Chicago so I can come collect in person. Here's a little advice for the future: When you come here try and just enjoy the rumors, dont go callin people out with stupid ass bets, that you know we cant verify. The fact you cant prove it is not only your stregnth but also youre weakness. I know its a thinker. Ask someone to explain what that means. I'll come back and check in a day or two. F#ckin kids
Posted by: goathedxxx | February 01, 2008 at 04:06 AM
"I haven't seen ONE baseball analyst knock this trade for the Mets, but clearly you know better."
Basbeall analysts arent that good at analyzing baseball. Especially on ESPN. They will always say the team who got the better immediate end of the deal. Thats because guys like Steve Phillips and Peter Gammons and Buster Olney dont even know what a prospect is. Their just like 10 year olds they see that Gomez, Guerra, Humber and Mulvey got traded. They are like wow! I have never heard of one of those guys! Must be a steal!! They were saying Fla go ripped off yb trading Miggy. Why? They got a potential ace, stud pitcher, and they got one of the most talented OF prospects in the world, in Maybin. What more would the twins want in a trade where they only had one real offer and they are selling one year or a guy, and this guy has been breathing down their neck giving them deadlines to make a trade, and this guy is demanding absurd money after he gets traded, 4 pretty good prospects is more then enough. Again, I would absolutely more then gladly give Johan back to Minnesota, take my 4 kids back and move on.
Posted by: nrmax88 | February 01, 2008 at 05:01 AM
A-rod... lol. I would prefer to see a 2 out rally ended by Ellsbury tapping a slow dribbler down the 3rd base line. Lugo is on second. Wagner forgets to cover first. Delgado gets flustered. Ball gets through his legs.
" A little roller up along first..... BEHIND THE BAG AND IT GETS THROUGH BUCKNER!!!!!! Here comes Knight and the Mets WIN IT!!!!!!"
Posted by: nrmax88 | February 01, 2008 at 05:18 AM
1st baseline**
Posted by: nrmax88 | February 01, 2008 at 05:18 AM
Actually, my predicition for the WS is Julio Lugo is struck out by Ruddy Lugo in the 17th inning of a game 7 of the WS at Shea stadium (The mets got homefield atvantage because Mark Texeira hit a game winning homerun off Mariano Rivera in the all star game.)
Posted by: nrmax88 | February 01, 2008 at 05:50 AM
hey nrmax, how much post do you have on mlbtraderumors..? like 10 billion..?
and why everyone praising omar so much, yankees pulled their offer, red sox backed down, of course the twins had to pick mets, not like they would have won if bosox and yankees were still offering.
well good luck to mets, i still favor arazona representing the nl in the world series, because of webb, haren and johnson.
i think oliver perez would be the sure thing one day, once he takes control of his command, and i dont think the mets would be able to sign him or maine after sanatana drained mets.
that money santana is asking for is too much, way to much, even for the best pitcher in baseball, to me he is a little greedy.
If santana dont sign with mets and go back to minni that would be crazy, he would be just like bill smith, greedy.The biggest offer is on the table and he did not take it, he wants more, he waits until free agency and he got injured and sign with royals for a minor league contract, i'm sorrry if this dont make sence to anyone, i had a hard night at work and im sooo confused, lol
Posted by: BxSquad | February 01, 2008 at 07:46 AM
"i think oliver perez would be the sure thing one day, once he takes control of his command, and i dont think the mets would be able to sign him or maine after sanatana drained mets.
that money santana is asking for is too much, way to much, even for the best pitcher in baseball, to me he is a little greedy."
Is Santana getting $23m versus $17m a year going to tip the scales for the Mets? Probably not and they get $20m from their naming rights to CitiField. They'll be able to afford Maine and Perez.
Whether or not Perez comes back, is another question. He is a Boras client, but Pedro's cash is off the books this year and Perez's pay raise could slot in nicely there. I am still holding out the unrealistic hope they extend him for another three years after '08 when they go to their arb metting.
As for Maine, I would expect an extension buying out the rest of his arb years this year.
My big concern is first base. After Delgado, there is not one person in-house and they probably will not be bringing in Teixiera.
Is Botts available? He might be an intriguing stopgap.
Posted by: themetros | February 01, 2008 at 09:51 AM
nrmax88...no I'm not a met's fan, just a casual observer. I just think it is crazy with how high salaries are getting these days. To think the creators of baseball made a vow that nobody should ever be payed to play the game...I'm sure they're rolling over in their graves...I just don't know when contracts stop climbing...500 mil? or higher? or will it keep going up? I guess we'll see.
Posted by: DLadd813 | February 01, 2008 at 11:26 AM