![]() |
|
|
| |
« Delgado MRI May Reveal Mets' Hole At First | Main | Managers On The Hot Seat »
This is a couple of days old, but Lou Piniella wants the Cubs to give GM Jim Hendry a contract extension.
"He's on the last year of his contract," Piniella said. "He has done a heck of a job here. I've seen where other GMs have been extended. Why not ours?"
The renewal of Hendry's contract is complicated by the pending sale of the Cubs. Piniella is worried that the sale could be dragged out, leaving the team without a general manager next off-season. On the other hand, any prospective buyer of the Cubbies may prefer to hire their own GM. If a deal is not reached on a new owner soon, this could potentially affect how the Cubs handle trades during the season and how they deal with free agents, player contracts and potential trades next winter.
Tim profiled Jim Hendry last May.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e550a3e7b58834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Piniella Wants Hendry Back In '09:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Ok, another “lets talk about nothing” thread… And a good chunk of them recently seem to be geared or trying to involve the Cubs in some way. This is the kind of stuff which will only enforce the feeling so many have that this is a Cubs board disguised as a real website.
Of course if Lou is asked a question about Hendry he will say exactly what he did. That isnt news, that’s the political response to a question asked. Then everything written about it afterward is nothing but repeating the obvious.
I’m sorry, but it seems as though you weekend filler guys are trying to make as many topics as possible in hopes of getting paid, no matter how useless, mundane, speculative and non-trade-related they are. Tim wouldn’t give us half this stuff, or he would just toss it in as a “odds and ends” or updates to already present threads if he did. I know you guys are trying, but this kind of stuff is just pointless…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 01, 2008 at 05:15 PM
gezz darkstar cut this guy some slack..they are knew so they arent as good as Tim yet so just cut this guy some slack!
Posted by: Larsen101 | March 01, 2008 at 05:19 PM
Darkstar, since this is a nothing thread, I have a question for you. Can you give me a link to the best explanation of BABIP?
Posted by: jrfukudome | March 01, 2008 at 05:35 PM
Talk of a GM in perhaps his final year isn't a nothing thread.
You people are such girls. Like you should give a **** if it's something that doesn't interest you?
Posted by: Game555 | March 01, 2008 at 05:40 PM
If we can stop debating the merits of the article for a minute and comment on the content...Hendry is a lousy GM who "won" a couple trades for Ram and D-Lee but for the most part has done little with a decent payroll, and has had a farm system that hasn't produced. And his organizational philosophy sucks, he doesn't seem to understand OBP value (except for Fukudome).
Posted by: rememberthecoop | March 01, 2008 at 06:10 PM
If people don't like reading about the Cubs, they can just go back and read ESPN.com to get their every day dose of what the Yankees and Red Sox ate for breakfast. Get over it!
On a side note, I'd like to say something about the ownership. Why is Bud Selig against Mark Cuban, someone who cares about baseball and is a fan himself, for owning the Cubs but then baseball allows cheapskates like Zell to own the Cubs while alienating everyone around him. This is also an owner who wants to destroy the name of one of baseball's landmarks despite huge public outcry against it.
I guess if you're Bud Selig's buddy like Canning you have the front seat. I hope that Cuban raises a stink about the process after Selig sabotages his efforts to buy the team. Frankly, reading about the present owner of the Cubs every day (along with his antics) makes me nauseous.
Posted by: TheGrinch | March 01, 2008 at 06:30 PM
"You people are such girls. Like you should give a **** if it's something that doesn't interest you?"
It has nothing to do with being interesting ~ it has to do with the fact that the threads contain no news what so ever in any way shape or form.
But since the entire point of this website is Trade Rumors, then let me ask you this ~ what does this one have to do with trade rumors? A manager says he thinks his GM is doing a fine job and responds to questions saying he wonders why he hasn’t been extended. Then there is some speculation as to why he possibly hasn’t been extended. Then there is some speculation about that speculation possibly effecting trades in the future. Well, the Twins are moving into a new stadium soon which I know I can find a link to someone talking about it. Then, moving into a new stadium might possibly mean the team could increase payroll and that inturn might possibly mean the team brings in a superstar FA. How about we start a thread saying that and ending with “could the Twins possibly sign Sabathia for the 2009 season” thread… Its about as news worthy as this… Oh, but it doesn’t involve the Cubs so it wont have a bunch of Cubs fans saying how its somehow important to be present on a Trade Rumors site so I guess that one wouldn’t work too well…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 01, 2008 at 06:50 PM
This is not Hendry's last year if HE doesn't want it to be. McFail gave him what amounts to a "player option" for 2009, before he left the Cubs.
Posted by: sweetswingingbw | March 01, 2008 at 07:14 PM
http://sweetonion.wordpress.com/2008/02/01/2007-break-outs-to-watch-out-for-not-in-a-good-way/
There's a decent explanation of BABIP for hitters. The importance being that extreme shifts compared to career norms are usually luck-based. Young players with extreme BABIPs are not trustworthy. Savvy & fast players are the ones that can keep up high BABIPS. Anything over a .350 BABIP is usually luck-based.
Interesting note, Ted Williams BABIP when he hit .405? Try .377! & that's not including Sack flies which would lower that number a little bit more.
Posted by: pinetarhand | March 01, 2008 at 07:33 PM
I posted this here because this post is pointless.
Posted by: pinetarhand | March 01, 2008 at 07:33 PM
cry moar plox
Seriously though, stop reading if it offends you so much.
As for Hendry, I'd say he's managed to make some pretty good deals, and he's made some pretty lousy deals, but overall, he's done a pretty good job and the farm system is producing now. Plus the Cubs have a lot of very good players locked up for long-term contracts. What's one more year, anyway?
If anything, I'd be more pissed at the Tribune Co. for finally dumping money into players when they could have had done it better years ago with proven difference makers like Pudge and Beltran. Instead they dump money into Soriano, a very good player, but very one-dimensional. Oh well. Might as well give Hendry one more year to work with and if things suck, then fire him.
Posted by: Dan Stabbingworth | March 01, 2008 at 08:24 PM
Why doesn't Hendry ever get any love for what he's done with the Cubs? He's won exactly as many world series rings as Brian Cashman, Billy Beane, and Omar Minaya since taking over a disaster of a team. I'm a Cubs fan, I freely admit that, but I just don't see why so many people hate Jim Hendry. The Lee And Ramirez trades were so good I'm surprised there weren't guns and masks involved, and with the except possibly of Jason Marquis he hasn't made any real 'waste of money' deals. The man's done a pretty damn good job of filling the numerous holes in the team MacPhail left him, and he's done it without gutting the farm system, which is finally starting to produce major league talent. We all have our own biases towards our teams, but i don't think anyone here who knows anything about baseball would say that the Cubs aren't better off now than they were before Hendry, and that they don't stand a pretty damn good chance of making the playoffs again this year.
Posted by: petrie000 | March 01, 2008 at 08:29 PM
@darkstar 1661 I love the internet. It gives everyone a place to complain about everyone and everything else.
So...how is this news on a Trade Rumors site. Obviously it involves a GM of a team that most figure to be in contention. The lame duck status does affect trade deadline deals when bullpen help might be needed. Is Hendry going to have the freedom to make deals to improve the team for the stretch run? If he's not guaranteed to return then what's keeping him from trading away the future (since he won't be around for it anyway) to make a run now? What if for the heck of it come July he trades Vitters, Veal, Ceda, Marshall, and Patterson to Minnesota for Nathan. Well, then when the off-season comes and there's still no owner and Hendry can't sign or re-sign his FA does that mean Nathan walks?
You wanted to know why there isn't a thread about the Twins? Sure they're moving into a new stadium and I'm sure there are articles about that. In fact the Rays have started their own stadium push (and it looks surprisingly cool) but nobody has mentioned anything about the Twins and CC.
I also love how people say "Except for the Lee and ARam trades, Hendry hasn't done squat." That's like saying, except for all those wins, the Red Sox haven't done anything. The fact is he did make those trades. And he did manage to bring in Soriano and Fukudome. Everyone fails to mention Lilly who had a pretty solid year last year. Traded for Barrett who did pretty well up until last year. Found someone to take Sammy AND LaTroy.
He's not the best (simply because the team hasn't had continued success and post-season success) but he's far from awful.
Posted by: CubFan81 | March 01, 2008 at 09:56 PM
If you go to the link about Hendry's profile, you'll see the whole shabang. As Tim pointed out, the reason Hendry's not a great GM is because of his free agency record and inability to get anything out of some veterans, which is clarified with the post about Marquis. Interesting to read the the comments section though.
Posted by: pinetarhand | March 01, 2008 at 09:58 PM
stupid Cork Gaines, I too am tired of all these Tampa Bay Ray bloggers who live in NYC posing as journalist who have a slant towards the Chicago Cubs and feel they must shove it down our throats daily.. he's just another dirtbag like eva's brother...hat tip Raysindex.com for exposing cork the fraud for who he is, another rays/nyc/cub collaborator)
Posted by: CubFanRaysaddict | March 01, 2008 at 11:02 PM
Cubsfan,
What you just posted is 100% speculation itself though ~ just like my “Twins to sign Sabathia” rumor would be 100% speculation. Both are just as likely to be true as the other; neither holds more weight than the other, and neither has anything that can really be pointed to in an effort to prove it really likely…
Hendry isnt going to trade away the farm for Nathan at the deadline though, its almost guaranteed not to happen. Shoot, he doesn’t even seem willing to offer more than a couple throw-in type guys now for Roberts now which is the reason that deal isnt done yet. And for all we know Hendry could be with the club in 2009. And for all we know the sale isnt the reason he hasn’t been extended anyway. And if anything it would probably be a lack of trade happening if a sale somehow affected the 2008 trades. And it hasn’t seemed to have affected the 2008 trades yet so why should it be expected to affect them tomorrow?
Like I said, this post is just worthless on the Trade Rumor level. We might as well have posts saying “the Yankees to sign Albert Pujols in 2012” (or whatever year he is a FA) ~ that has about as much rumor substance as this thread… If you are a Cubs fan and want to attack me because I stated the extremely obvious fact that this isnt a real rumor, that’s cool because I am experiencing it in another thread and really have come to just expect it from almost all fans of that club. But to say this somehow relates to Trade Rumors is purely a stretch, there is no getting around that…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 01, 2008 at 11:17 PM
LMAO, 90% of whats on this site isn't news. Theres is a thread and then all you guys repeat the same opinions over and over again. It isn't the sites fault for having alot of Cub news. Blame WGN for telecasting the Cubs nationally. And blame yourself for responding to all the Cub threads. That's the beauty of being able to navigate around to what you wanna read there, Darkstar.
Posted by: goathedxxx | March 03, 2008 at 02:54 AM
Also, Darkstar,
Would you like them to change the name of the site to
"MLBtraderumorsandfreeagentspeculation.com"
Then would you cease to complain? I love how people always blame the Cub fans for certain things. It's not enough that we haven't won anything forever, but now you want to limit our hope too? Unbelievable! LOL
Posted by: goathedxxx | March 03, 2008 at 03:04 AM