![]() |
|
|
| |
« Kovacevic Chats Draft With Pirates Execs | Main | Bill Bavasi's Job Secure »
Baseball Prospectus' John Perrotto has a new column up; let's discuss the hot stove tidbits.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e55296be4d8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Perrotto's Latest: Atkins, Holliday, Howard:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
THE SEATTLE MARINERS!!
Beltre and a prospect for Howard
Posted by: lars | May 26, 2008 at 12:50 AM
Yankees? Mets? I doubt the Phillies would trade Howard to the Mets though. Angels? I know Kotchman is playing good but they might want somebody like Howard. Mariners?
About 4 teams is all I could see that would be interested. And remember Tex will more than likely go to one of those teams or go to the Orioles or resign with the Braves. So there really is not much of a market for the Phillies to get great value for Howard next year. I think they should maybe wait and AFTER the 2010 season trade him if they want to.
I seriously doubt the Phillies will trade Howard to the Mets, and I doubt the Angels give up some of there good farm system for him (they rarely ever trade them in a big package). So basically the Yankees and Mariners. But do the Mariners have ENOUGH to get Howard after they gave up so much for Bedard? So if you REALLY look at it the Yankees is the ONLY real team that could actually give up players the Phillies would want. Maybe Cabrera, Joba or Kennedy, and Austin Jackson If the deal involves Kennedy instead of Joba. I doubt the Yankees give up Cabrera, Joba AND Austin Jackson in the SAME deal for Howard.
For the Phillies is that worth it instead of paying Howard? I dont know but they could just pay him and see what the market would be for him AFTER 09.
Posted by: braves#1 | May 26, 2008 at 01:08 AM
The Phillies would be trading Howard to gain breathing room within their budget. I don't see how Beltre does that for them. You should really think about how a trade affects both teams and not just your own.
It would make sense for Howard to be in the AL and not have to field, no? The Mariners and Yankees seem to make sense to me.
Posted by: Adam H. | May 26, 2008 at 01:09 AM
howard to A's
Kendrick
for
Blanton
Barton
Carlos Gonzalez
Kurt Suzuki
Trevor Cahill
Posted by: arly2380 | May 26, 2008 at 01:11 AM
How about Toronto? Always looking to make a splash in that division, should have the payroll flexibility, and could use him in a DH/1B rotation with Overbay, where they're both in the line-up every day.
Posted by: Michael | May 26, 2008 at 01:11 AM
I am from Philadelphia and a very active reader on the team and this website. I am aware that keeping Howard and Hamels long term may be impossible, but honestly I don't see us dealing Howard until 2010. (Also, I am not "for" keeping Howard long-term. I love him, although, he is old for his MLB service time and by the time he is eligible for free agency I think he may only be used as a DH.)
Go Phils!
Posted by: Luke | May 26, 2008 at 01:13 AM
salary wise the beltre for howard doesnt make since but talent wise it does becuase beltre was really good for the Dodgers and howard would make since for the Mariners
Posted by: lars | May 26, 2008 at 02:00 AM
Only way I see Mariners making sense is if they'd include Clement. Ruiz/Coste isn't exactly threatening. Some would bring up that Clement really can't play C, but let's be realistic here, the Phils are about the O not the D.
Posted by: ksesxe | May 26, 2008 at 02:17 AM
ya thats y i said beltre and a porspect most likely clement
Posted by: lars | May 26, 2008 at 02:26 AM
Arly that trade suggestion is hilarious. I love that you have Kendrick going to the A's along with Howard, as if that makes the return of Blanton, Gonzalez, Barton, Suzuki, and Cahill any less absurd. Why in the world would the A's pony up that many players of that caliber for anyone, let alone a DH nearing free agency?
Posted by: aap212 | May 26, 2008 at 04:30 AM
"Why in the world would the A's pony up that many players of that caliber for anyone, let alone a DH nearing free agency?"
Easy. Jack Cust, Mike Sweeney, & Frank Thomas aren't enough players fighting for time at DH. Granted, two of them minimum would be gone by 2009.
Posted by: ksesxe | May 26, 2008 at 05:14 AM
Easy? You just answered why the A's would trade for a bat with no D, not why they would trade two top prospects, two regulars with no service time, and a solid starting pitcher for such a bat who's expensive and soon to be a free agent.
Posted by: aap212 | May 26, 2008 at 06:39 AM
My guess would be the Dodgers or Yankee's both will have the need and both have the prospects.
I can't see the Jays, I mean who would they trade? Travis Snider? I don't think anyone see's that happening.
Posted by: Dev0 | May 26, 2008 at 06:40 AM
If Howard were to be traded to Toronto, I would think the phils would demand Rios as the starting point, with at least one A-Quality Pitching Prospect.
The Phils really need help in OF as Burell may be gone and an outfield of Victorino, Werth/Jenkins, and Golson would be one of the Worst OF's in Baseball.
When they move Howard I see them moving Utley to 1st and looking internally for a 2nd Basemen.
However, I don't see it Happening as it really makes no sense of the Jays as I doubt very highly that Howard would be content playing there.
Of Course, if Howards OBP continues to plummett, his value is going to greatly diminish.
Posted by: tmichalski | May 26, 2008 at 06:49 AM
Excuse me. What i meant really is that if his K-Rate keeps surging every year, and his walk-rate goes down, then his value is going to plummet.
Posted by: tmichalski | May 26, 2008 at 06:51 AM
For the yankees, Howard is intriging. To trade for him would mean not losing out on the tex sweepstakes. However if they cannot envision him at 1b for years to come than it doesn't make sense to do it. They need a 1b, not a dh. After the bedard trade, I think seatle might have cold feet. Why not KC?
Posted by: Black_Angel_ | May 26, 2008 at 07:20 AM
I think SF could make sense. SF needs a new face to build upon and they love power guys.
SF gets:
Howard
Burrel or Adrian Cardenas
Drabek
Phi gets:
Lowry or Zito and his horrid contract
Sanchez
Villanova
Travis Ishikawa
Posted by: BaLLooNNoT | May 26, 2008 at 07:31 AM
Jeff Clement wouldn't exactly be enticing to the Phillies in a Mariners deal. Sure, Coste and Ruiz isn't "threatening," but it gets the job done.
They've also got two solid prospects coming up in the system that should be around the major league level by the time the team's considering trading Howard.
What the phillies need is pitching (just like almost everyone else), and possibly a third base solution and outfield help.
Posted by: no funny hats | May 26, 2008 at 07:56 AM
here's why my A's offer is fair
phillies fill several position needs for now and the future. barton should do much better in philly
suzuki is solid, not sure if they are sold on ruiz or not
cahill is a stud, pair him with hamels for the future.
gonzlez gives them a CF
blanton gives them a solid mid rotation guy.
they fill 3 positional needs and add 2 pitchers to the rotation
why do A's do this? they desperately need offense. thomas/sweeney are short term fixes. cust is good, but they can put him in LF, Howard at 1b/DH
Barton is expendable, A's have doolittle/carter in the minors. especially doolittle what a surprise.
i hate to give up gonzalez, but ryan sweeney looks to be a keeper in CF. which would leave gonzalez in RF. do A's need another corner OF with buck/cunningham etc plus maybe they get lucky if a hererra/robnett/putnam/brown/mitchell/desme etc progress as expected
Posted by: arly2380 | May 26, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Where would Ryan Howard go? Hmm I guess it depends on what the Phillies feel he is worth. Is he an MVP type player or the guy who thinks he is worth A-Rod money?
We get the normal Boston and NY. Just because they are who they are. But lets see who else? Texas? They got out of the A-Rod stuff after A-Rod opted out. And they need a 1B. LA Dodgers? Loney looks to be great but he is not a 50 HR 150 RBI monster. Giants? They need a middle of the line up thumper. Baltimore? If they miss out on Teixeira they will still need a middle of the line up hitter (well 3 actually). Cleveland? Hafner hasn't quite lived up to his end of the deal.
Posted by: XD23 | May 26, 2008 at 10:10 AM
How about Ryan Howard to the Dodgers? James Loney is a hell of a defensive 1B, he can hit , but not for power. With Jeff Kent on his way to retirement, and with a powerless Andruw Jones crowding the oufield, LA needs a "big bat" in the lineup. The Dodgers could afford the salary as well.
Posted by: jskohl | May 26, 2008 at 10:10 AM
arly, your offer for Howard isnt a bad one but Howard will never end up in Oakland, they just dont trade for big money guys. Beane would never trade young studs for a guy who is going to demand huge money. They just traded a top SP in haren who was signed cheaply for several years for half the guys you included. There is absolutley no chance that this happens.
Also regarding Howard, I think any team who ponys up 20 million/year is going to regret it in a mjor way. He has got Jason Giambi written all over him. Hes going to be 30 when he hits free agency and seems to think he deserves a 7 or 8 year contract. By then he will barely be able to stand up let alone field a groundball.
Posted by: curse_ended | May 26, 2008 at 10:45 AM
The Tampa Bay Rays make a lot of sense to me. They have the farm system, the need, and the cap room to add a player like Howard. I think a package of McGee and Davis should get it done. The Rays would have a formidible lineup. Picture Iwamura, Crawford, B.J. Upton, Howard, Pena, Longoria, Brignac, Jennings, Navarro. They still a good rotation of Kazmir, Shields, Price, Garza, Jackson. The Rays would win the world series with that team. The Phillies would still have a good lineup and a good rotation of Hamels, Myers, Davis, McGee, Kendrick. Plus, they would have the cap room to extend Lidge and Burrell. The trade would help both teams a lot. But, I doubt the Phillies would be willing to give up Howard. It probably wouldn't happen, but it would be awesome if it did.
Posted by: Joe | May 26, 2008 at 10:51 AM
I would love to face the 'meat' of that lineup. 400 K's between Howard and Pena alone. Both lefties, both ineffective against southpaws. Two automatic outs after the 7th if my team happens to have effective southpaw relief.
Posted by: Dirty Water | May 26, 2008 at 11:13 AM
I don't know why a team looking to contend would sell their farm for a mediocre hitter who hits homeruns when they could plunk down a bit of coin for Bonds who would prob give similar production for a lot less. On the Rays would be just be a DH ? Pena's D is much better at 1st then Howards is. So your basically looking for a replacement for Cliff Flyod / Gomes.
And Oakland doesn't need a long term solution at DH, no team does. It's one of the easiest positions to fill. So Beane will end his rebuilding project for some guy to hit homeruns and be gone before the new stadium opens ? ya, makes sense. Though hilarity would ensue while watching Howard trying to run behind Thomas on the basepaths.
Howard is no Mark Texiera
Posted by: BaseBallz | May 26, 2008 at 11:28 AM
A Todd Helton trade to the Rays, now that would be awesome. Great 1st baseman, great offense and amazing leadership to help the hitters. And Helton would def be an upgrade in D over Pena. And with the Rays prospects they could work a deal where the Rockies pay some of Heltons contract.
Between Percival and Helton the Rays would be a force in the post season.
Posted by: BaseBallz | May 26, 2008 at 11:32 AM
I think SF could make sense. SF needs a new face to build upon and they love power guys.
SF gets:
Howard
Burrel or Adrian Cardenas
Drabek
Phi gets:
Lowry or Zito and his horrid contract
Sanchez
Villanova
Travis Ishikawa
Posted by: BaLLooNNoT | May 26, 2008 at 07:31 AM
We must remember that 3 years ago Ryan Howard was offered straight up for Barry Zito and the A's declined. You people need to stop with your "video game" trades. The most ridiculous one I heard was Matt Holliday to the Phils, Howard to the A's, prospects to the Rockies. These are MVP caliber players getting swapped, I don't see it happening.
Posted by: Luke | May 26, 2008 at 11:47 AM
Who would want Howard? I wouldn't touch him with a ten foot pole. He strikes out too much and can't drive in runs when it counts. This seems to sum up the sentiment of several posters.
To which I say ... are you crazy?
The guy has a CAREER OPS of 980. He posts a solid 400 OBP and will hit between 260-290. How is that bad? And, oh yeah, he is also the best power hitter in the game.
He's off to a slow start and he still 2 HR's off the ML leader. He's on pace to hammer 40+ home runs, score 100+ runs, knock in 100+ rbi's and walk almost a 100 times. And again, did I mention that he is off to an incredibly slow start? I expect those numbers to go up significantly.
I'm not a Phillies fan but I just love Howard's bat. Please help me understand what you don't like about it. And please tell me how a ROY / MVP / ML Home Run Leader gets so little respect in this forum. He's had 3 years in the majors. Seems like he has done OK for himself in a very short period of time.
Posted by: bjsguess | May 26, 2008 at 12:02 PM
It's not that people don't like his bat. It's that Howard is going to be one of the best DH's to come around since Ortiz.
The problem is how do you value a great DH in a trade ?
You really can't consider him a position player longterm -- once he gets hurt, which being older and already past him prime once hitting FA -- is a possibility, it extremely limits any small/mid market team like Oakland or Toronto.
Howard would be amazing on the Mets, Yanks, or any other big market team as a DH. But when people consider trading Oaklands/Tampa's farm for a DH that they can't keep then people start seeing a trade for Howard as ridiculous.
Howard is great, trading for Howard could be a colossal mistake, especially with that Oakland trade idea.
Posted by: BaseBallz | May 26, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Actually Luke, its not a video game trade, its a very legitimate offer. Lowry OR Zito with Sanchez and Villanova is a very valuable bounty going back to Philly. They would get a good pitcher in Sanchez, a decent pitcher in lowry or Zito and the 3rd basemen they so covert in Villanova.
Going the other way, The Giants get the formidable HR hitter they can build around and they get a very promissing young SS/2b in Cardenas or they can take Burrell for some more power and hope to resurrect his career outside of Phi. Even though he's doing so this year already.
then to balance things out a bit, SF gets a young pitcher in Drabek and Phi gets a young 1b to fill the organizational void at 1b left by trading Howard.
Now granted, it has some kinks and might have to adjust a few things, but its a very legitimate trade for both teams.
Posted by: BaLLooNNoT | May 26, 2008 at 12:23 PM
Halladay for Howard seems like a good fit.
Posted by: PhillyRocks | May 26, 2008 at 12:26 PM
Howard would be amazing on the Mets, Yanks, or any other big market team as a DH.
Posted by: BaseBallz | May 26, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Howard as a DH for the Mets... now THAT would be amazing! Great stuff...
And someone in the baseball world still thinks Barry Zito retains any kind of trade value? God I love the humor this site consistantly provides me with daily.
Posted by: bucs_lose_again | May 26, 2008 at 01:10 PM
No way the Giants are going to trade for Howard. They could just draft a first baseman this year.
Posted by: kdub | May 26, 2008 at 01:32 PM
Holliday to the CUBS!!!
How about this:
Cedeno/Pie/Hill/Murton/Patterson
For
Matt Holliday
Posted by: uww1 | May 26, 2008 at 01:55 PM
loney hit 331. with 15 hr and 60 plus rbis in half of a season. why wouldnt we want howard. could you imagine him and kent? i dont like kent at all but still. i mean what would the dodgers have to give up loney plus two more?
Posted by: 661folife | May 26, 2008 at 02:55 PM
I think Howard/Kemp is probably the ideal situation. Kent has lost it.
Plus Kent is in the last year of his deal. Coletti almost has to make up for Andruw Jones.
Posted by: jskohl | May 26, 2008 at 03:31 PM
yes pay with his job. and i meant can you imagine kent and howard in the club house. ha i dont count on kent all he does is hit soft tossing lefties.
Posted by: 661folife | May 26, 2008 at 03:50 PM
Cedeno/Pie/Hill/Murton/Patterson
For
Matt Holliday
Okay this needs to stop cub's fans. This crap is not going to do it. If Holliday is moved it will be for A+ prospects. Not guys with service time and players who have never performed.
Now for Howard, he will not be moved for at least a year so who will need a 1b/dh and can afford a Miguel Cabrera contract. My guess yankees,mets,orioles,giants,and maybe angels.
He won't be dealt to the mets because it's in division.Won't be the O's cause they are rebuilding and I see them signing a free agent instead. Really I would see the angels as my top. They have been in the market for a big offensive force for it seems years. They have the prospects to get it done and a glutton of outfielders so they could move one of them.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | May 26, 2008 at 06:07 PM
Oh and I think the phils will sign him longterm any way. But my post is just hypothetical.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | May 26, 2008 at 06:09 PM
Texas is my best bet. but nothing is going to happen any time soon. philly is in contention in a major way
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | May 26, 2008 at 08:26 PM
How about at this year's trade deadline?
Howard for Burnett/Lyle Overbay?
Posted by: nini2287 | May 26, 2008 at 10:04 PM
Texas has way too many young 1Bers that should be with the big team by September.
Chris Davis, Max Ramirez is starting to look like his future is at 1B if he's not DHing, John Mayberry Jr., etc.
Posted by: Michael | May 27, 2008 at 12:12 AM
yea, i knew about davis and maxram. rangers have a hole burning in their pocket, i know it
if philly has to, i hate to say it, but nyy is always a good place for expensive dhs; him in front of arod would be lethal
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | May 27, 2008 at 01:11 AM
After reading over some of these proposals, I am realizing that some of them just make no sense.
For instance, I don't see the A's as a trading partner really. We have no need for Kurt Suzuki. We have our own catching prospects coming up in Jason Jaramillo and Lou Marson. Carlos Gonzalez would just be thrown into the OF mix and might get lost in there. At this point we have no need for a CF. Blanton would be interesting, though I would almost rather have Howard.
Same goes for the Mariners. We don't need a catching prospect unless it is something earth shattering. And Adrian Beltre?!? Might as well just keep Howard if we are getting Beltre back in return.
The Yankees would be an interesting deal if they were willing to give up Joba and Melky Cabrera in a deal. We need pitching badly and Melky could fill-in in the outfield nicely.
My proposal is somewhat similar to what the guy who suggested the Giants said. Something like this:
Howard for Angel Villalona, Tim Alderson, and someone else. Maybe Dan Ortmeier.
What to do with the Phillies then? Sign Pat Burrell and shift him to First Base. Pat's glove is almost useless in the outfield as it stands now. Keep Utley at Second Base. Start working out Adrian Cardenas in the OF. Bring up Greg Golson to play LF.
Alderson would give them a good pitching prospect for the future. Third Base is the position they obviously have no depth at. Feliz will be there through next season, but he doesn't have a future with the team. Villalona could be that future big bat they need at the hot corner, something they haven't had since Scott Rolen left.
Why this trade would work for the Giants? They still need a big bat to fill the void left by Barry Bonds. Bengie Molina and Aaron Rowand aren't clean-up hitters. The Giants just seem to have a hole both at First Base and in the middle of the lineup. Howard could fill that hole, imo.
Posted by: eforsheezy | May 27, 2008 at 07:40 AM
I'm a Phillies fan and I don't see Howard being moved after the season as a realistic possibility, but...
I think LAA certainly have the pieces, and could have the interest in locking up Howard to a long term deal. They could pick up Howard without doing much to their major league club, and could really use a lefty bat to go with VG and Hunter. They seem to have the money as well. This would be the most realistic partner, and I could see them being highly interested. That being said, Kotchman appears to finally be having a very good year
I am certainly no expert about their system, but I could say maybe one of their top MLB ready starting prospects, and one or two high upside arms/corner outfielders/3Bs
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 27, 2008 at 08:33 AM
I also think any Giants trade would have to involve Cain (I'm assuming the little righty with the mullet is untouchable). Phillies have a big need for power arms in the rotation, they have a lefty on track for 2010 in Savery that hopefully will be a better Lowry. Zito...nice try from that SF fan, but that's pretty laughable
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 27, 2008 at 08:47 AM
First of all....for John Perrotto to call the Red Sux pitching staff an "embarassment of riches" is an embarrassment to journalism! Last I checked, Beckett has a 4.43, Wakefield a 5.19, Buckholtz a 5.53 before the DL and Colon will break down like every year. Besides Dice-K and Lester pitching well every other start, where are the lights out except for on YOUR bandwagon Perrotto?
As for Howard to the Yankees? LOL!!! The Yankees need a first baseman that strikes out 200 x's a year and can't field like they need a case of crabs. Furthermore, the knuckleheads on here including Joba for him need to put down the illegal substances. Tex is a free-agent if they want to over pay...and if not, between Jeter, Jorge and the rest of the aging stars the Yanks have, they'll find one internally I'm sure. If Howard strikes out 200 x's in the NL, he'll strike out 250 in the AL Beast!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | May 27, 2008 at 08:50 AM
Not that Howard would be poor value for Joba and a decent outfield prospect, but I definitely don't see them moving Joba or Hughes for anyone if they weren't willing to give them up for Santana.
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 27, 2008 at 08:55 AM
Wow. People are stupid.
Here's a whole site of supposedly baseball savvy people with absolutely NO conception of trade value, all laying out absurd hypotheticals with one underlying commonality tainting the lot of them: each is weighted in favor of that fan's respective team.
You don't need to know uww1 to know he's a Cubs fan; just look at his 'offer' for Holliday... Matt Murton, Ronny Cedeno, Eric Patterson, Felix Pie, and Rich Hill. The most intriguing components headed to Colorado here are Rich Hill- a guy who got DEMOTED- and Felix Pie- a kid with a line of .222, .286, .286. A .286 Slugging Percentage?! Sure, he's still just 23, but- uh- buyer beware, y'know?! I think Matt Holliday commands a bit more than that, no?
Amidst the Ryan Howard talk a far worse offender emerged in Balloonnot, who proposed a deal of Ryan Howard AND Adrian Cardenas AND Kyle Drabek for Noah Lowry or BARRY FRIGGIN' ZITO, Jonathan Sanchez, Angel Villalona, and Travis Ishakawa. That Balloonnot later defended the proposal as 'a very legitimate offer,' only added to the absurdity.
Let's say we take Zito out of the picture, since that's about the dumbest thing I've ever heard in my entire life... That still leaves you with Lowry, Sanchez, Villalona and Ishikawa for Howard, Cardenas, and Drabek. Breaking it down a bit further, that's one solid- even good- mid-rotation southpaw, an elite FIRST BASE prospect in Villalona (where are you getting third?) a middling back of the rotation piece of crap and ANOTHER 1B prospect...this one crappy. On the return, you're getting one of the game's top bats AND two TOP prospects- a first rounder from '06 and arguably the best 2B prospect in the game (albeit a blocked one).
Eforsheezy's Villalona, Alderson, and a third prospect sounds much more reasonable. Forget Cardenas and Drabek altogether.
And on and on they go.
Apparently Philly fans are just as bad- Joba?...c'mon!
People need to wake up to some semblance of reality. Just because you're a fan doesn't mean you have to be an idiot. I love the O's. We need a SS...bad. Still, I'm objective enough to know that a Hanley Ramirez AND Cameron Maybin AND Ryan Tucker for Jeremy Guthrie, Matt Albers, Bill Rowell, and Brandon Snyder deal ain't gonna happen. Not now, not ever. And I think it's fair to say that Jimmy Rollins, Carlos Carrasco, and Joe Savery for Brian Burres, Hayden Penn, Nolan Reimold, and Brandon Tripp is outside of the realm of possibility as well. While I'm certainly a bit biased toward my team, this bias has its limits. Namely, common sense.
Now, as for the Phillies' star 1B; if Howard's going anywhere, I'd bet on the Yanks. He fits the profile of a high-profile Yankee pickup and they're one of the few organizations who might be willing to pony up what Howard will be asking in FA. It'll come down to whether they nab Tex or not. I'd guess they could get it done for Melky Cabrera, Jose Tabata, Ian Kennedy, and a secondary pitching prospect...maybe less (Rasner, Tabata, Gardner, and McAllistair?) It'll cost NY a solid package of prospects/young players, but not the farm. After all, they'll still have to sign him to a long term contract!
Posted by: milehigh78 | May 27, 2008 at 12:07 PM
milehigh...you rip each of these trade proposals, and then put forth your own gem of trading Ryan Howard after the 2009 season for Daryl Rasner and three mid-level Yankee prospects?
Great job for not being a "homer," but please explain to me how that is any better than the proposal of Holliday for the Cubs' pu pu platter? Gillick would be tarred and feathered, and perhaps euthanized after that trade
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 27, 2008 at 12:19 PM
gomes, keep in mind that the market value for howard might not be too high; he is a butcher at first, k's alot and wants a big contract. albeit there are a few pluses too
and don't nitpick. my man gave a high and a low. jose, brett and zach are not all mid level prospects either. lay off the yankee hatred
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | May 27, 2008 at 12:42 PM
I'm not "hating," just noting that those prospects are not regarded among the very top of their farm system. If Howard goes for a prospect package, there absolutely needs to be a blue chip guy as the centerpiece.
Angels, start with Adenhart and add from there. Giants, start with Cain. Yankees, the talks would have to start with Joba or Hughes, whether you like it or not.
The Phillies are not going to sell on this guy for 50 cents on the dollar (which is what getting a journeyman and three non-blue chippers would be) like they did with Abreu. This is why any deal is unlikely.
Thanks for the info about Howard as well...arbiters must have seen "some pluses" when they gave him 10mio this offseason
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 27, 2008 at 12:48 PM
"THE SEATTLE MARINERS!!
Beltre and a prospect for Howard"
Get ready for the ire of BaseballGuru.
"I think LAA certainly have the pieces, and could have the interest in locking up Howard to a long term deal. They could pick up Howard without doing much to their major league club, and could really use a lefty bat to go with VG and Hunter. They seem to have the money as well. This would be the most realistic partner, and I could see them being highly interested. That being said, Kotchman appears to finally be having a very good year"
Kotchman had an excellent year last year, despite the fact that he sustained a concussion and all that goes along with it. Merely looking at HR numbers doesn't do his year justice. The previous year was shot because of Mono. Oh, and he is 4 years younger than Howard and plays Gold Glove defense. That would be a terrible deal. The Angels have zero need.
"My guess would be the Dodgers or Yankee's both will have the need and both have the prospects."
How would the Dodgers have the need for Howard? Loney is like the Dodgers' version of Kotchman with a potent lefty bat and stellar defense, and he is nowhere near arbitration. All that, and the Dodgers can't hide Howard at DH
Posted by: AA | May 27, 2008 at 01:08 PM
AA, I'll admit that I may be underrating Kotchman, but I still see the Angels as a potential fit due to payroll flexibility, a stocked system, and the need for left handed power. I could see them thinking that they are that big bat away from being back at the top of the AL
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 27, 2008 at 01:16 PM
The idea that any team would not want Ryan Howard is just insane. Is he off to a slow start? Sure. But look at the numbers this guy puts up. He is a top of the line hitter. Now why wouldn't the angels want him? Because of Kotchman? Well yeah Kotchman is nice in the field but come on are we really saying that equals Howard's production. Howard would be great DHing for the angels. He would give them some real thump. They can aford to sign him long term. They have tons of pieces the phillies would want in starters and outfielders. The Phillies would love to get their hands on guys like Ervin santana or Mathews jr.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | May 27, 2008 at 02:09 PM
"LA Dodgers? Loney looks to be great but he is not a 50 HR 150 RBI monster."
Take a look at the analysis below about the Angels, and double it. Howard's numbers will drop big time in a place like Dodger Stadium and his defense will be glaring. Further, there will be no chance to DH him, which means you have to lose significant runs per year because of his defense. That, and Loney is a better all around hitter than Howard, recent slump notwithstanding.
"AA, I'll admit that I may be underrating Kotchman, but I still see the Angels as a potential fit due to payroll flexibility, a stocked system, and the need for left handed power. I could see them thinking that they are that big bat away from being back at the top of the AL"
Kotchman and Anderson are left-handed power. A double is just as good as a homerun when it doesn't come with an insanely high risk of a strikeout and crap defense. Further, you ever take a look at the 2002 Angel team? Troy Glaus had the most HR on that team with 30, and the biggest power bat was Anderson with 29 HR and 56 2B. You don't need eye-popping HR numbers to win. In fact, GA had 4 more EBH that year than Hunter had the year he hit 58 dingers. Add to that the Angels now have better pitching and defense, plus a guy named Guerrero.
Another consideration is the fact that Howard plays in a launch pad while the Big A is a pitchers park that plays more for gap hitting than homeruns. Howard's numbers would drop and he wouldn't have the speed or contact to make up for it.
"The Phillies would love to get their hands on guys like Ervin santana or Mathews jr."
The Angels wouldn't give up Santana for Miguel Cabrera, who is a better hitter and defensive player, not to mention cheaper, younger and less of a head case. Forget about it.
"They can aford to sign him long term."
Can they afford it? Perhaps. Why should they sign him to an insane deal when they already have plenty of production and can spend their money elsewhere? Plus, I don't see Howard going first to third like Scioscia wants, and that could lead to some serious issues.
"Well yeah Kotchman is nice in the field but come on are we really saying that equals Howard's production"
Combining the number of runs he saves, the significantly better contact and his own excellent production, he is more valuable than Hunter. Not to mention that he is cheaper, will always be cheaper and is younger.
"But look at the numbers this guy puts up. He is a top of the line hitter."
He is a hell of a power hitter, but that is it. He isn't much for average and K's at an alarming rate. That, and he sucks with RISP and is an abject liability in the field. He is basically McGwire without the defense and with more K's.
Posted by: AA | May 27, 2008 at 03:36 PM
Please look at Howard's home/road splits AA. He has a higher slugging percentage each of the past two years on the road. There goes that arguments.
And where is this "less of a head case than Miguel Cabrera" coming from?
You are clearly not being fair here if you are saying Kotchman's defense and production are more valuable than Howard.
Also, all you are making Howard out to be the worst first baseman in the world, while clearly not watching him play. He's below average in range and has a scattershot arm, but has good hands and is the second best defensive 1B in his division right now (with Johnson on DL). He's also better than Prince Fielder
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 27, 2008 at 03:43 PM
Furthering my point, Ryan Howard has yet to have a major league season in which he has hit more home runs at home than on the road
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 27, 2008 at 03:49 PM
First of all, the only player the Phils would want from San Fran is unavailable. Why would we want anyone but Lincecum? Could you be anymore of a HOMER by offering up BARRY ZITO AND HIS CONTRACT! You would have to send Cain or Lincecum AND Zito to get rid of his contract.
As far as possible suitors go, the only real scenarios I see would be the Yankees, the Rays, and the Blue Jays. Out of those 3, only the Yanks make sense. A package to the Yankees could probably get Wang to Philly. Wang would fit in nicely in Philly being prodominently ground ball pitcher. I really think that this may well be the Plan B for the Yanks at the winter meetings. Tex is obviously Plan A, with the Mets, Braves, and Orioles in the mix on him too.
If the Yankees acquired Howard, the would be able to cut ties with not only Giambi, but with most likely, Bobby Abreu. They could move Duncan to RF full time. And to the poster saying Howard would fit nicely in front of A-Rod, you must be smoking something. Why would you want to clog up the base path? A-Rod 4 Howard 5.
Posted by: Lumpster | May 28, 2008 at 11:36 AM
I say he's not going to either LA team, nor is he going to the Yankees (who will outbid themselves to get Teixeira). Assuming they don't wait beyond this offseason, I can see Howard to SF for Cain, Sanchez, a middling hitter like Bowker, and maybe some cash considerations.
Another option is the White Sox. Kenny Williams loves to make a "big splash" and Thome's option year should be bought out this offseason, making him a free agent (and freeing up a roster spot). Williams can re-sign Crede (not a great idea, but not totally horrific either assuming his back holds up) and trade Josh Fields with Brian Anderson and young pitching (Danks? Floyd???) for Howard. Philly gets better at 3B, rolls the dice on Anderson in CF, and some pitching help. Chicago gets another big bat to challenge the AL Central pitching, while Williams fills the holes in his pitching staff with free agents and prospects.
Posted by: ben | May 28, 2008 at 01:51 PM
Okay, I know Pedro Feliz is no David Wright, A-Rod, or Zimmerman, but why are so worried about him. The Phillies, like every other team, need STARTING PITCHING. So for all of these trades based around average to slightly above average starters, just keep the ideas to yourself. We have plenty of OFers currently between the Active Roster and other internal options. Thank you.
Are you serious about GAVIN FLOYD?! We traded Gavin Floyd as a throw in to get Garcia. He doesn't have the mental make up to be a top of the rotation kind of guy. I would rather roll the dice on top pitching prospects than on Gavin Floyd.
As far as who would outbid the Yankees, I think the Mets could. You have to remember that Tex has to want to go to the Yanks. It wouldn't surprise me to have the O's pushing hard for him either. They have almost no stars with massive contracts.
I know it has about a .00001% chance of happening, but if the Indians are out of it come the end of July, do they trade Sabathia?
Posted by: Lumpster | May 28, 2008 at 03:38 PM
White Sox not a terrible idea, Fields would have appeal (but as a LF replacement for Burrell), add Danks or maybe even Buerhle (pretty good contract) and Thornton or a hard throwing low-level prospect
Posted by: wayne gomes | May 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM
My cousin actually works as a personal assistant to someone who works in the Phils front office. I haven't been told anything concrete, but she told me she has not heard one person in that office talk about the idea of trading howard, but I think the Phils would be better off dealing him soon. If I am the GM, i want 6 pieces in return, i don't mentio specific teams or players, because you can insert and team and its' players in this formula. I trade Ryan Howard I want back, 1. A top national pitching prospect that can start immediately (Tim Lincecum like rookie), 2. An established big league starter under the age of 26., 3. A national top hitting prospect (A plus or higher: perferably at 3rd Base), 4. A major lrague ready pitcher younger than 28, 5. A team's top 10 prospect, and 6. A team's top 30 prospect. If an extension is reached to make the deal work, that is a fair trade off. You can insert any team, with players that qualify and figure out which is the best return.
Posted by: Jet017 | May 30, 2008 at 06:42 PM