![]() |
|
|
| |
« Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Trade Deadline | Main | Stark's Latest: Dunn, Tankersley, Sherrill »
3:09pm: Jayson Stark says the Yankees view Washburn as a salary dump, and won't include even low-level prospects unless the Mariners eat money or take Igawa.
1:27pm: Peter Abraham says the Yankees are trying a new way to get Washburn. Neither Abraham nor Geoff Baker believes Washburn's no-trade clause will be an issue or something the Yankees would compensate for.
9:59am: SI.com's Jon Heyman says Seattle's request of Cabrera and Gardner for Washburn is "a non-starter for the Yankees."
FRIDAY, 9:21am: Joel Sherman says Igawa is not part of the Washburn discussions.
THURSDAY, 5:36pm: According to Ed Price of the Newark Star-Ledger, talks have progressed on a possible Washburn-Yankees trade. Price says the Ms aren't sold on Kei Igawa, but the Yankees are willing to discuss Melky Cabrera and Brett Gardner.
4:56pm: This is a bit out of order, since Abraham's info below actually came out after this Seattle PI column from John Hickey.
Hickey says the Yankees, Cardinals, White Sox, and possibly Brewers have talked to the Mariners about Washburn. The pitcher's no-trade clause allows him to block a deal to the Yankees but not the Cards or Sox. He seems willing to waive the clause, anyway.
11:12am: According to Peter Abraham:
One trade the Yankees could make now if they wanted would be Kei Igawa and a B-level prospect to Seattle for LHP Jarrod Washburn and DH/1B Jose Vidro. The Yankees would take on $16 million (plus a $500,000 buyout for Vidro) while shedding the $9.4 million owed to Igawa.
So for roughly $7.1 million, you get Washburn for this year and next and Vidro for this season. Washburn would likely want something to waive his no-trade clause, which includes the Yankees.
I agree with Abraham - that seems pretty reasonable. As he says, you can just DFA Vidro. Washburn alone is worth it, as long as the prospect isn't anyone special and he doesn't demand a ton for the no-trade compensation.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553d1e27b8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Jarrod Washburn Rumors:


|
|
Scraps for scraps.
Seems fair enough.
Posted by: kermit | July 24, 2008 at 11:25 AM
AS much as i would love to see the Yanks rid themselves of Igawa and the money, is Washburn any better than Darrell Rasner?
Rasner has faired decently filling in the Yanks rotation, and while he hasnt started as many games, has similar numbers to washburn, his strike out ratio is much higher, and is younger.
Not a bad deal, but i dont know who wins here.
Posted by: EastCoastie | July 24, 2008 at 11:28 AM
"AS much as i would love to see the Yanks rid themselves of Igawa and the money, is Washburn any better than Darrell Rasner?
Rasner has faired decently filling in the Yanks rotation, and while he hasnt started as many games, has similar numbers to washburn, his strike out ratio is much higher, and is younger."
But wouldn't you feel better going down the stretch with Washburn starting instead of Rasner? Washburn has a bunch of playoff experience from when he won a WS with the Angels, and has actually been pitching quite well the past couple months. In the Yankees position no doubt I make that move. Can't really hurt all that much.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 24, 2008 at 11:32 AM
Washburn also has decent enough career numbers in the AL East parks and is Sandy Koufax Jr. in Topacan Field.
Posted by: kermit | July 24, 2008 at 11:52 AM
"Topacan Field."
Which is, of course, how my people spell Tropicana Field.
Posted by: kermit | July 24, 2008 at 11:54 AM
I can deal with Washburn the rest of the season. But is he really worth having in the rotation next season as well? Plus, he'll likely require some compensation for waiving his no-trade clause. So, figure that's another two year extension.
Is Washburn worth giving 3+ years for that rotation?
Posted by: Aaron | July 24, 2008 at 11:54 AM
I can deal with Washburn the rest of the season. But is he really worth having in the rotation next season as well? Plus, he'll likely require some compensation for waiving his no-trade clause. So, figure that's another two year extension.
Is Washburn worth giving 3+ years for that rotation?
Posted by: Aaron | July 24, 2008 at 11:56 AM
So the Yankees add about 4MM on to this years payroll and 5MM to next years payroll so they can dump Igawa's 8MM for the 2010, 2011. Probably a little bit more for this year, though, because they need to pay Washburn to wave his NTC. I think it's a fair deal. Pretty much their paying only 2MM extra for a #4 starter, just paying a lot in advance. I like the deal better for the Yanks than the M's, but it's pretty fair.
Posted by: Joe | July 24, 2008 at 12:03 PM
"Plus, he'll likely require some compensation for waiving his no-trade clause."
Pretty sure he'd just want money to waive it. Don't recall a player ever demanding a 2 year extension to waive a NTC.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 24, 2008 at 12:32 PM
I don't understand how such a proposal "seems pretty reasonable". Washburn can pitch, albeit not so great for his present contract in Seattle, but Igawa most certainly cannot; he has proved that time and again. Understanding the Japanese ownership of Seattle having an affinity for Japanese players, why would even they accept such a bum deal?
I think it's bogus. NY either must eat all of Igawa's and Washburn's (and maybe Vidro's as well) contracts or they won't be getting him. That is fair.
Posted by: Dirty Water | July 24, 2008 at 12:43 PM
Furthermore, this Washburn may actually do pretty well for the Yanks.
With the name of the game in Yank stadium (old and new) being 'neutralize the lefties' Washburn does very well against them: Career .245/.302/.398 ain't chopped liver.
Posted by: Dirty Water | July 24, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Washburn is worth more, especially with Vidro on the block too. Not that either of these players particularly are anything special, but Washburn is OK and Jose Vidro has his good moments--although only on a few occasions/season.
Kei Igawa isn't very good and neither will be the prospect NYY would shell out. I'm calling shananigans on this trade. Bad deal for the Ms. Offer Washburn elsewhere if possible.
Posted by: 116ismyfavoritenumber | July 24, 2008 at 02:25 PM
But I guess that leaves the question, who'd be willing to eat Washburn's & Vidro's contracts. Argh...
Posted by: 116ismyfavoritenumber | July 24, 2008 at 02:28 PM
Well if traded...Vidro would just be DFAed....where would he play and whose roster spot would he take....thew Yanks in the end just eat his contract.
Posted by: Andy | July 24, 2008 at 03:57 PM
"Jose Vidro has his good moments."
Yep, like that one time he and Bartolo Colon formed a buffet tag team in 2002(they both played for the Expos that year) and polished off the entire after-game buffet themselves....
Oh, wait, you were probably referring to on-the-field moments, right?
Hmmmm....can't think of one good moment recently. ;)
Posted by: StarryEyed | July 24, 2008 at 04:35 PM
I could see Kenny Williams picking up Washburn. KW normally doesn't get rental players and we'd have Washburn for 1+ seasons. Not sure who we would send over with him or what we would do with our rotation. Maybe shop Vazquez. But then you have to ask, who would you rather have Vazquez or Washburn?
Posted by: striker | July 24, 2008 at 05:06 PM
If the Yanks trade Gardner and Cabrera for Washburn, who's left to play the outfield positions they currently play? One can only conclude if they do pull off that trade, the Yanks have already lined up another trade for an outfielder or two.
Posted by: enchinga | July 24, 2008 at 06:07 PM
Striker-
No questions asked, I would rather have Williams pick up Washburn. I want to see the sox fail!
Posted by: Ronnie Woowoo | July 24, 2008 at 06:38 PM
I can't seem to fathom the M's (or any team for that matter) wanting to trade for Igawa.
Posted by: nikhilr28 | July 24, 2008 at 07:42 PM
I'd have to agree with enchinga. Space fillers or not, SOMEBODY has to play the outfield.
Posted by: johnflaherty | July 24, 2008 at 08:34 PM
enchinga/johnflaherty:
I don't think the rumor means they are considering trading BOTH melky and gardner...just one or the other. So whoever wasn't included in the trade would be their everyday center fielder. I don't think Washburn is worth either of them. Not that either of them is that great but just take him on as a salary dump.
Posted by: johnnyC | July 24, 2008 at 08:59 PM
enchinga/johnflaherty:
I don't think the rumor means they are considering trading BOTH melky and gardner...just one or the other. So whoever wasn't included in the trade would be their everyday center fielder. I don't think Washburn is worth either of them. Not that either of them is that great but just take him on as a salary dump.
Posted by: johnnyC | July 24, 2008 at 09:03 PM
I'm all for the yankees giving up igawa for washburn, but melky too? that would be a terrible move for the yanks. first of all, i dont think gardner is ready to be the everyday center fielder right now. granted, he has played almost everyday in left field. damon DH and share left field with gardner.
and anyways, cano wouldnt be happy if melky was to leave.
Posted by: Sal from Tampa | July 24, 2008 at 10:23 PM
Why the heck would the M's even think about thinking about accepting Kei Igawa? Saying he has no value is an understatement.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 24, 2008 at 10:49 PM
"Pretty sure he'd just want money to waive it. Don't recall a player ever demanding a 2 year extension to waive a NTC."
I remember this one guy demanding a 7 year extension nto too long ago ;)
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 24, 2008 at 11:31 PM
Jesus, how on earth could the Yankees ever survive without the 2008 production of Melky Cabrera and Brett Gardner. You can add their OPS' up and it barely is even 1000. Seriously though, Melky is not valuable, to the guy saying why would we trade our 24 year old starting CF for Washburn? Just because he is starting doesnt mean he is any good. Trade him for Washburn and then go trade some no name prospect for Marlon Byrd and stick him in CF. There you go, consider Melky's pruduction replaced, and then some.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 24, 2008 at 11:38 PM
"But then you have to ask, who would you rather have Vazquez or Washburn?"
Oh my god c'mon of course you'd rather have Javy Vazquez. He's reverted back to his older less consistent ways, but last year he was one of the best pitchers in the AL. When the guy is on he's an ace, while Washburn hasn't really pitched that well in a few years. I could still see the Sox adding Washburn, but he'd be their 5th starter/insurance because they're not moving anyone from that rotation.
Posted by: scribbletone | July 25, 2008 at 12:11 AM
HAHAHA, I think we can finally get over this 'Melky Cabrera is a great prospect' notion if they are even discussing trading him for freaking Washburn.
Posted by: the lowercase zach is better | July 25, 2008 at 02:02 AM
This is typical NYC bias when evaluating players. Washburn is a legit 4 or 5 pitcher in the rotation while Igawa isnt qualified to pitch for Tacoma. The fact that anyone would deem a Washburn for Igawa trade as fair only shows that they have no clue about baseball. I agree that the M's should trade Washburn, but if the best they can get is Igawa then we should just keep him. It is not that big of a money dump. It would be giving up a so so pitcher with a huge contract for a terible pitcher for a huge contract.
Posted by: ZBham | July 25, 2008 at 02:45 AM
I think our options for Wahburn are to either dump his salery with a team like the Yankees and recieve a middle of the road prospect or to trade him and eat some or most of Washburn's salery and recieve maybe two mid prospects or may be one good prospect if we can find a desperate enough team. But absolutely no Igawa.
Posted by: ZBham | July 25, 2008 at 03:06 AM
This still doesnt make much sense to me. Unless the Yankees have another deal on the table for an outfielder why would they offer melky or gardner?
Its no secret that melky hasnt produced this year, but who steps in within the yankees organization to even put up the same numbers?
Im a die hard yankee fan and try to look at everything with an unbiased eye, but the yankees pitching has been very good lately, VERY good, they need a bat, and if they are going to add a starter, they need to add something a little better than washburn.
If im seattle, i dont want igawa either, i dont blame them.
Posted by: EastCoastie | July 25, 2008 at 09:36 AM
"This still doesnt make much sense to me. Unless the Yankees have another deal on the table for an outfielder why would they offer melky or gardner?
"Its no secret that melky hasnt produced this year, but who steps in within the yankees organization to even put up the same numbers?"
I'll give you a hint - his father was a Yankee in the 1970s and he's going to be wearing pinstripes once he's busted for tax evasion. He is the fradulent home run king - Barry Bonds!
Posted by: cmac1973 | July 25, 2008 at 09:46 AM
If Bonds goes to the Bronx, can Damon still play center?
Posted by: cmac1973 | July 25, 2008 at 09:47 AM
And, my mistake: Bonds isn't on the hook for tax evasion. It's just perjury.
Posted by: cmac1973 | July 25, 2008 at 09:48 AM
And, my mistake: Bonds isn't up on tax fraud charges. It's perjury. Either way, I bet he makes a lot of musclebound new friends after his MLB career is over.
Posted by: cmac1973 | July 25, 2008 at 09:49 AM
lower case zach
You must have been drunk typing at 2am. It's the YANKEES that would NOT deal Melky for Washburn.
Melky is STILL only 23 years old, is a switch hitter, has led the league in outfield assists already, can steal a base, has a cheap contract and again, at only 23, obviously not yet reached his full potential.
On the other had, Washburn is 34 years old, has a 4-9 with a 4.75 era AFTER kicking butt recently and is making nearly 10 Mil this year and next.
I can see you not wanting Igawa. We'd trade him for an iPod...but to laugh at Melky for him is pretty ridiculous.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | July 25, 2008 at 09:50 AM
cmac1973
The cavernous Yankee Stadium outfield consisting of a 44 year old Bonds (with shot knees), Damon (with a shot shoulder and no arm to begin with) and Abreu (who never met a wall he wasn't scared of) ?? Are you serious?? LOL!!!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | July 25, 2008 at 09:55 AM
No way bonds comes to the bronx, just no way, but if by some brain fart the yankees did bring him in, he would never see the outfield grass at yankee stadium.
Posted by: EastCoastie | July 25, 2008 at 10:03 AM
Personally, I don't want Washburn at all. Not because of this year...but because there is money to be spent next year and better free agent options to fill out the rotation. Wang and Joba are set. Andy is a maybe if he keeps pitching well and wants to play another year. I think you count this year for Moose as a blessing and thank him for the memories. If Hughes/Horne/Kennedy/Aceves is ready, maybe one takes a spot. Still possibly one more spot to fill and Sabathia, Sheets, Burnett, Dempster, Garland and Lowe are ALL better options than Washburn.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | July 25, 2008 at 10:06 AM
Did somebody seriously ask if Damon could play CF? I would pay big buck to watch an OF of Barry Bonds in LF and Johnny Damon in Center. It would be a riot and possibly the worst defensive OF in the history of the game.
Posted by: MickS | July 25, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Hahahahaha this just gets funnier every moment. If anyone thinks its fair sending Melky AND Gardner for a washed up washburn, then you guys maybe the dumbest people ever! Melky for Washburn straight up is over paying! Igawa and a low level prospect is perfectly fair for a terrible pitcher in Washburn.
It cracks me up reading people saying that Bonds will be a Yankee. His name was brought up by Hank, but so was every other name. They have no interest what so ever, who ever thinks the Yankees have interest in Bonds is an idiot, and really needs to start paying attention to baseball.
Posted by: yanks26ngoin | July 25, 2008 at 10:11 AM
You all act as if Matsui is a gazelle out there and that Johnny Damon's arm just recenlty started to suck. The Yankees are all about the big names. That's why they paid Roger $18 mil last season. I suppose Yankee fans would rather see more Justin Christian and Brett Gardner than take a chance on Barry? Maybe if the lineup didn't have five or six DH's, they would be able to avoid Bonds in left field, but I bet it happens buy this time next week.
Posted by: cmac1973 | July 25, 2008 at 10:12 AM
"I would pay big buck to watch an OF of Barry Bonds in LF and Johnny Damon in Center. It would be a riot and possibly the worst defensive OF in the history of the game."
You're forgetting about when the Red Sox had Kevin Mitchell in left, Mike Greenwell in center and Jose Canseco in right. Now THAT defense sucked.
Posted by: cmac1973 | July 25, 2008 at 10:14 AM
if the yankees do that deal, trading melky for washburn, they could just sign kenny lofton to play center
Posted by: fgsfsfbbbrd | July 25, 2008 at 10:45 AM
"if the yankees do that deal, trading melky for washburn, they could just sign kenny lofton to play center"
As a Red Sox fan, I hope the Yankees do sign Lofton. How does that move make any more sense than signing Bonds? Is Lofton's defense much better than Bonds' at this point in his career, especially after sitting out all year? Also, didn't Lofton hate New York and vice versa? He was a part of the 2004 chokers though, so I guess it wouldn't be so bad.
Posted by: cmac1973 | July 25, 2008 at 11:00 AM
yankees should have never signed sexson so quickly. he's only started in one game so far. they should have tried to make a deal for texiera first.
getting bonds make sence though. they need a guy who gets on base a lot. but when you think about it, where are they goning to put him in the linep. i doubt he'll play defence, and there is only one DH spot. when posada comes back, if he comes back, he'll share DH and first base with Giambi.
Posted by: Sal from Tampa | July 25, 2008 at 12:15 PM
You're forgetting about when the Red Sox had Kevin Mitchell in left, Mike Greenwell in center and Jose Canseco in right. Now THAT defense sucked"
You're right...that defense DID suck. What's your point? In case you're one of the zillion NEW Sox fans...you didn't win with that outfield...or ANY outfield for that matter...for 85 YEARS!!! LOL!!!
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | July 25, 2008 at 12:54 PM
First of all, I have been a Red Sox season ticket holder for 20 years now, so I hope that answers your question of whether I'm a NEW Sox fan. We call them Pink Hats around here actually. Secondly, I was making a tongue-in-cheek point that the Bonds-Damon-Abreu trio would not be the worst outfield defense ever.
And, you're right, the Sox didn't win a championship for 86 years, but you can't argue with their success lately. I would say they've erased any memory of the mismanaged days of old with two World Series titles in four years. Even a die-hard Yankees fan can't argue with that. Meanwhile, the Yankees continue to not be able to resist making the big splash or signing the big name, which is why they have so many older players signed to long-term contracts, and why they will not be able to resist the allure of signing Bonds when Matsui gets around to deciding he's out for the rest of the season.
Posted by: cmac1973 | July 25, 2008 at 01:08 PM
The Yankees need to finally pull the plug on Pavano after this season.
Posted by: Sal from Tampa | July 25, 2008 at 01:19 PM
"Scraps for scraps.
Seems fair enough."
Yup.
Posted by: Meoveryouok | July 25, 2008 at 01:48 PM
Why don't people realize how bad Melky Cabrera is? Just because he is young? He is a crappy fielder, a crappy hitter, with an above average arm. That is all he has going for him.
Posted by: nrmax88 | July 25, 2008 at 02:01 PM
Package him with Ian Kennedy and it's like turning off Fair Trades in MVP Baseball.
Posted by: Meoveryouok | July 25, 2008 at 02:11 PM
wilk75 (houston): Rangers-Yanks trade...Salty for Ian Kennedy?
Joe Sheehan: Saltalamacchia seems to be third on the list in Texas, so this deal might make sense for both teams, but I think Daniels would want more back. Would Kennedy and Edwar Ramirez be too much? Kennedy's value has plummeted this year. It'd work for the Yankees, who would have an offense/defense combination behind the plate, and a candidate for a job-share with Posada at C/DH for the next couple of seasons. I just don't know if it's enough to get him.
Posted by: Meoveryouok | July 25, 2008 at 02:16 PM
"Why don't people realize how bad Melky Cabrera is? Just because he is young? He is a crappy fielder, a crappy hitter, with an above average arm. That is all he has going for him."
Crappy fielder? Really? Have any concrete evidence of that?
He's an excellent fielder.
He's been in a horrid slump since... early May. That's bad.
That said...
.268/.333/.400
That sucks, right?
Age 24: http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/players/playerpage/8190
(no, I am not comparing Melky to that player. Just saying... age 23 stats aren't the end all be all on anybody).
Posted by: V | July 25, 2008 at 02:38 PM
Get'r done M's. Anything in addition to a bag of balls for Washburn and $13M is a bonus.
Posted by: Logger | July 25, 2008 at 02:41 PM
"The Yankees need to finally pull the plug on Pavano after this season."
I think that's a foregone conclusion, as his contract expires at the end of the season anyway. ;)
Posted by: StarryEyed | July 25, 2008 at 03:09 PM
"won't include even low-level prospects unless the Mariners eat money or take Igawa."
Hang up the phone, Seattle. Don't let the Yankees strong arm you into taking garbage for at least a serviceable pitcher.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 25, 2008 at 03:29 PM
Well Melky is not .268 .333 .400 he is worse at .248 .305 .349. And those are even below his career numbers. Aren't young kids supposed to get better?
Posted by: XD23 | July 25, 2008 at 03:32 PM
"That said...
.268/.333/.400
That sucks, right?"
Look at how he's only gotten worse since 2006.
"Age 24: http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/players/playerpage/8190
(no, I am not comparing Melky to that player. Just saying... age 23 stats aren't the end all be all on anybody)."
Bernie hit .306/.393/.485 at AAA in 1992 when he was 23 years old. Melky has never had an 800 OPS on any level of professional baseball. He had a .798 OPS in A and A+ ball and a .996 OPS in AAA in 2006 but that was only 31 games.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 25, 2008 at 03:33 PM
yankees should trade cano hughes and alberto gonzales edwar ramirez to Marlins for Hanley Ramirez and scott olsen . Move Jeter to second base. Sign Tex in offseason.
Arod
Ramirez
Jeter
Tex.
Nice infield............
Posted by: hittmen21 | July 25, 2008 at 03:43 PM
Stary Eyed: hahaha, are you serious Vidro and Colon actually did that? That's freakin' hilarious. Well, I meant how Vidro only hits well when his team is already in the lead. I guess I would retract "has his good moments" and replace it with "can catch his team's hitting contagent once in every blue moon". Insurance runs never hurt, that's for sure!
IceDrake's "Hang up the phone, Seattle. Don't let the Yankees strong arm you into taking garbage for at least a serviceable pitcher" comment is absolutely spot on.
The first team able to trade on a contract like Washburn's was the Yankees, and now if they're too choosy on who to send out (assuming the Ms would even consider taking Igawa as well) I'd move onto the next team willing to talk. It'd either shut the Yankees up or make them play the trade fair, and either way it's more beneficial for Seattle. It's not like the Red Sox or Cardinals wont trade for Washburn/Vidro. Plus, those two other teams have better offers.
Posted by: 116ismyfavoritenumber | July 25, 2008 at 03:48 PM
hittmen21, what are you smoking? Explain why the Marlins would trade Hanley. Let alone for a 4th OF, inconsistent 2B, minor leaguer, and mediocre reliever. Where would they play Uggla and Cano?
"IceDrake's ... comment is absolutely spot on."
Thanks. So tired of the Yankees thinking they can get anything they want. Must be Hank negotiating this trade.
Seattle should just call the Cardinals. They're desperate and wouldn't give you a piece of crap like Igawa.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 25, 2008 at 05:06 PM
Igawa is'nt a piece a carp. He was great in Japan. I know he's been horrible in the bigs so far. I think he just needs to stay in the minors for another year to get used to U.S. batters.
The Yankees put a lot of presure on him too be like Dice-K in Boston.
Trading him to Seattle might be good for him and he'll probably be more comfortable on a non-contending team. He'll also be pitching to Johjima, a Japanese native.
Posted by: Sal from Tampa | July 25, 2008 at 05:32 PM
Please, Igawa is a piece of the Yankees' scrap heap. What he did in Japan hasn't translated to the majors. He's been bad at the ML level. He's an AAAA pitcher since he's done alright in AAA. He is not worth Jarrod Washburn straight up. Washburn can at least put up an ERA better than 6 in the majors.
Posted by: icedrake523 | July 25, 2008 at 09:09 PM
I don't know if Washburn for Igawa would work other than for salary dump purposes, especially since Washburn isn't the same pitcher he was years ago with Anaheim. If anything, he is a decent innings-eater at this point in his career. Someone made a good point about Igawa using Kenji Johjima as a batterymate - things like that with Japanese pitchers always made me wonder considering the language barrier.
However, and most importantly here, is there any other team in baseball that needs to cut bait with a player more than Seattle with Vidro? They continue to hold onto the idea that he belongs in the DH spot, even putting him in the cleanup spot more than a few times this season. Please get rid of him and bring up Wladimir Balantien or put Clement at full-time DH and let Johjima earn his contract at catcher, or do something other than keep Vidro! Why is Seattle such a poorly run organization at this point?
Posted by: MattyMets | July 25, 2008 at 11:49 PM