MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Players Not Traded | Main | Waiver Trade Explanations »

Trade Deadline Reactions

Trade deadline reactions are all over the web today, as you might expect.  Keep checking back to this thread - I will continually add to it.

  • ESPN's Jayson Stark provides his winners and losers.  SI.com's Jon Heyman does the same here.  Seems like there's some debate on the Red Sox.  Both journalists agree on the Pirates, Marlins and Rays as losers and the Dodgers and Yankees as winners.  Ken Rosenthal sees the Red Sox, Dodgers, and Pirates all as winners. 
  • Keith Law has been analyzing every trade for ESPN.
  • Deadspin opines on Jon Heyman's apparent scoop of the Manny trade over ESPN.  To be fair, though, ESPN scooped the Mark Teixeira and Ivan Rodriguez trades.  Ken Rosenthal at FOX had the Ken Griffey Jr. scoop.  And all three big guys were careful about putting out bad information, which can't be said for every outlet.
  • South Side Sox doesn't like the Ken Griffey Jr. acquisition.  Sox Machine insists Griffey cannot play center field.
  • Ken Davidoff's winners and losers.  You have to give him credit for standing alone and calling the Yankees losers.
  • Joel Sherman brings us inside the whirlwind trade talks yesterday between the Red Sox, Pirates, Dodgers, and Marlins.  The Marlins were willing to trade Jeremy Hermida and then some for a couple of months of Manny...something to keep in mind.
  • David Lennon discusses the high prices being asked of the Mets for Manny Ramirez and Jason Bay.
  • Every year around this time, there's some pining for "trade rumor batting averages" for each journalist.  I don't believe this can be done.  We might be able to keep track of those who jumped the gun with "done deals," or those who snagged scoops.  But if a journalist says ten teams are interested in Brian Fuentes but the pitcher stays put, that journalist may have been 100% accurate.  We will never have perfect information.  I don't buy the lazy line that writers make stuff up or 99% of rumors are untrue.  I believe that journalists claiming inside information actually did hear it from someone inside the game.  Keep in mind that execs can put bad info into circulation too.


Full Story |  Comments (24) | Categories:

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e553c80fc18833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Trade Deadline Reactions:

Comments

From Starks article:

"Did the Pirates get one young impact player back in any deal?" wondered an executive of one team. "My answer is no. Did they get an Evan Longoria-type they could drop in the middle of their order?"

Andy LaRoche is batting 5th tonight, LOL @ ESPN continually being wrong.

Losers: Baltimore

Granted, without some 'freedom of information' act for baseball, we'll never know exactly what was being offered for guys like Sherrill, Huff, Roberts, etc. Still, I think it has to be considered a failure that McPhail was unable to find a match for any of his trade chips.

For Sherrill, for instance, he was reportedly looking for 2-3 prospects when one- were it the right one- would have sufficed. With Roberts, everything I read made it sound like he shut down talks before they'd begun. In the Baltimore Sun, he was quoted as saying something along the lines of, 'I'm not of the mind to give other teams false hope.'

Screw false hope, how 'bout giving your own fan base some real hope for the future?! The Bedard and Tejada deals(Bedard in particular) were great baby steps, not the end all be all. While it sounds like he knows this, actions speak louder than words. The next time Sherrill will have as much value as he had yesterday, will be the 2009 trade deadline. Can we say with all certainty that Georgie boy will remain healthy until then? That he'll remain effective until then? Of course we can't! Loewen's going back to the minors to transform himself into a position player for God's sake! A LOT can happen in a year.

We may never know what kind of offers were on the table, but the chances that at least one of them was pretty decent is fairly good. Furthermore, THEY don't have to come to YOU...a notion McPhail doesn't seem to get.

Until such a time that he does, it's going to be the same old story in B'more. You know how it ends.

You kind of knew this stuff would find its way to the press:

The Providence Journal reports that Red Sox GM Theo Epstein met with team veterans on Wednesday, and they told him that Manny Ramirez had to go.

The players were not only tired of Manny's antics and felt that he was a distraction, but they didn't trust that they could count on him during the pennant race. One story in the Boston Herald on Friday quoted a teammate as saying "He just doesn't care." Another Herald story discussed his refusal to visit with young cancer patients, calling him a "bum." It seems most everyone involved with Manny in Boston is happy to see him go.

The Red Sox FO have had a history of this and although I complement them for extracting an obvious problem, I also condemn them for releasing this spin.

I like how Heyman says Luis Ayala has a 6 ERA. He has a 5.54 ERA and up until this season, his career high was 3.19.

I don't understand how Pittsburgh can be considered losers here. I think they got a haul for 1.3 years of Jason Bay. Their window to compete probably doesn't open until 2011, and they really increased their chances at putting a very good team on the field in that window.

The dodgers did pretty well in the fact that they gave up Laroche, who they weren't going to use anyway (which I think is a dumb decision...) and aren't paying a dime of Manny's contract, and are guarenteed 2 very good draft picks as well.

I think the Sox are the biggest losers here, but it became more and more obvious that they HAD to move him...and did what they could to get the best available bat to replace him.

Overall, I wouldn't say anyone was fleeced here, but I believe the Pirates are actually the biggest winner.

As a Mets fan, I'm relieved that Omar Minaya didn't panic and overpay for Raul Ibanez or Randy Winn or someone like that. The Mets' offense has been surprisingly good-- they're 4th in the NL in runs scored.

If Omar holds onto his young talent, the Mets could be in really good shape in a few years. Fernando Martinez, Jon Niese, Wilmer Flores, Brad Holt and Reese Havens are all guys I'm really excited about and I'm glad all those guys are still in the Mets' system.

I don't see how the Pirates are losers they got exactly what they needed. He says that Laroche couldn't crack the lineup in LA they also never really gave him time to stick it out in the lineup they just saw him struggle and said oh go back to the minors. What Stark also fails to mention is that guy with Tommy John surgery is still a highly touted prospect.

By the way last night on sportscenter and baseball tonight both Gammons and Kurkjin called the Pirates winners so I'll trust them over a Heyman and Stark anyday.

Hard to brand the Bucs a winner or a loser. I liked the Bay trade, but was less enthused with Nady/Marte.

"Hard to brand the Bucs a winner or a loser. I liked the Bay trade, but was less enthused with Nady/Marte."

I'll agree with that. I was talking about the Bay trade specifically. The other trade is going to have everything to do with whether Tabata can fulfill his potential or not...

"You have to give him credit for standing alone and calling the Yankees losers."

Funny, I've been calling them losers for years.

Yeah, I really am that hysterical.

JK47- Havens and Holt could not be traded, due to the fact they were JUST DRAFTED.

The Pirates are losers, since not getting one of the top 10 pitchers or prospects from either red sox or Yankees, whom BOTH NEEDED to find the players that they traded off.

I would have taken a top 10 or even top 5 player from Yankees and put up McCutcheon and Karsten with say A. Jackson. The pirates will never be great until, they can pull of the trades like a say.....Billy Beane.

BY the way can you honestly tell me a lineup consisting of

Bay, McClouth, McCuthcheon...Alvarez, Wilson, Sanchez,Laroche/Pearce, and Doumit is better then

Moss, McClouth McCuthcheon...LaRoche,Wilson, Sanchez, Laroche and Doumit...

Seems to me they were locked in with Bay and Alvarez and could have secured the starting pitching and it still would not have been painful in their Payroll.

There wasn't really any losers in this trade deadline. Pittsburgh got some good young talent, boston got a good bat but should have got more help in the bullpen, and L.A got manny,and white sox got jr. I don't know why people are saying the pirates were the losers of the trade deadline. They got a good out fielder(moss), and future closer(hansen, just hope he works on control). I really don't know anything about the two other players the pirates got. Can't wait to see how manny does in l.a and how bay does in boston tonight!

Just remember...
Last year when the Red Sox traded for Eric Gagne, they got rid of David Murphy instead of Brandon Moss, because they thought Moss had more potential. And look at the season Murphy has had for Texas thus far. So Moss could be a decent pick up for Pittsburgh. Craig Hansen had no future here. His premature promotion to the big leagues fried his brain. He is a 2-pitch guy. Decent fastball, very good slider if he can control it. If he can CONTROL it. Which he hasn't shown he is able to do. LaRoche was a prospect in decline for L.A., and DeWitt seemed to leap-frog over him in the depth charts. I never heard of the 4th guy. The Dodgers got the bat they need to make a run at the N.L. West for nearly nothing. Manny is playing for a 4 year contract, so expect him to put in a 100% effort. Okay, maybe 80% effort. With Jason Bay...how many big at-bats has he ever had. What is his post season stats. How many times has he batted in a home game with more than 8000 people in the crown. Jason Bay is a wait-and-see. Hopefully he performs well.

Not bad for my first-ever post. A couple of grammatical errors, but those who live in glass houses...

I don't think u can call the sox losers yesterday as their hand was forced....I mean one minute you workin out deals for bay/wilson/grabow while tryin to talk to the phils, mets, the dirty dirty marlins, the dbacks....the dodgers waited til last second and forced their hand bc they knew boston wanted to move manny.

I heard a rumor of talks with cincin and toronto...any truth to that?? w/ manny goin to cincin and crisp goin to toronto...I duno b/c what would have the return been? Dunn,another offer for griffey...mayb ekstein goin to the sox....hope it was jus a rumor.

If anyone can be considered winners it'd have to be the dodgers, cubs, yanks and mayb the brewers.

Seattle should of really cleaned house.....goodbye ichiro, cya ibanez, adios washburn, tootalou putz. Taking the pirates approach might of been a lil better come off season.


if anything the old rumors of clay bucholz to the rox for brian fuentes wouldn't have been to bad, I think the sox shoulda asked for clint barnes also.....they still have masterson you kno and pauley as well and a wide awray of young guns.....they also could of made a move for the return of bronson....paul byrd woulda been ok with me sticking in the back of the rotation hell even getting in on the washburn deal jus to syke out the yanks a lil ya kno.

Anywho let the fun month of august get underway and see who really made out.

The Yankees definitely did not improve as much people may think they did. They sort of filled holes for the sake of filling holes without much reason to it as most of the upgrades were marginal over what they had.

2 months of manny plus cash for a year and 2 months of bay is not a losing deal. At the end of Bays contract they can let him walk and get something better than Hansen and moss back easily. Its only a losing deal in peoples perception of Manny's intangible qualities and at this point it is pretty clear he has quite a few negative intangibles as well.

I'm an O's fan, so I appreciate the Bucs' willingness to at least take a few chances. Certainly they gave themselves a better chance to compete in the future with these young players taking the place of vets who will likely be on the decline by the time Pitt's window opens.

That said, I was not overly impressed with the return they got on arguably their top two players. Initially, I thought they did terribly, but I'm coming around a little bit on the Bay deal.

Nady/Marte was bad, but not as bad as some suggest. It remains to be seen whether the Bucs could've gotten more for the pair, but neither is a spring chicken and Tabata has legitimate star potential. Sure, he's had a pretty poor year, but remember how young he is and how advanced his competition is, also. I'd be pretty shocked if any of the other players picked up figure prominently in the Pirates' future, though McCutchen does seem to have at least some upside.

The Bay deal is impossible to really assess properly at this time. All four of the prospects acquired have the potential to be quality MLB players...or total washouts.

LaRoche never really got a fair shake in LA, though I'm of the opinion he's been overrated as a prospect. His tools don't impress me and his numbers appear to have been inflated to a significant degree, by his environment. Not only does DeWitt have a higher ceiling, but it seems to me that one need only look to brother Adam to find a decent comp. Though a decent major leaguer who's, thus far, had a modestly successful career, thus far, we're not talking about a star. I find it unlikely Andy will prove much better.

Morris obviously has the highest ceiling, but he also he's also the most likely NOT to contribute at the major league level. Clearly, his stuff is good- you don't get drafted in the first round if there isn't something there to intrigue the scouts. However, he's already got a TJ surgery to his 'credit' and the sample size is too small to establish whether there's enough there to consider him a real top prospect. Certainly he's one to keep an eye on.

Moss and Hansen both strike me as role players, though I could see Hansen being traded back to the Red Sox five years from now in a deadline deal (LOL). Hansen has the stuff to close but it hasn't translated thus far, due to a lack of command. Moss is just you average solid, blue collar type that teams tend to love...until there's a better option available (though I suppose that could be said of just about anyone; you know what I mean, though). He'll give you league average numbers until the next big corner outfield prospect comes along and then he'll be relegated to 4th OF status. With so many third basemen in the system (or likely coming in Alvarez's case), that could happen sooner rather than later.

You'd like to see at least one top prospect come back in a Bay deal and I am truly surprised that the Bucs didn't insist on James McDonald over Morris, but, contrary to what I wrote yesterday, it's not an AWFUL return.

Of course, the reality is, we won't REALLY know one way or the other for a few years. Baseball history is riddled with 'good' deals gone bad and vice versa. Which will this be?

Peoples opinion of the Bay deal depends if they still naively believe one player makes a team and cheap regulars have no significant impact on a team.

History will be more kind to the Bucs than people think. I bet they get at least 2 very solid major leaguers out of their deals + another 2 or 3 useful players now. That won't be bad considering they dumped an average OF (in Nady), an above average reliever and a very solid OF in Bay.

For me, one of the most intriguing stories going forward is the comparison of Manny and Bay.

Will Manny get that fire burning again and destroy NL West pitching? Will Bay be able to handle the stress of being thrust into a pennant race in Boston?

There have been plenty of players over the past several years that came to Boston that just wilted under the pressure, at least initially. Others have thrived. Which path will Bay follow?

Should be very interesting to watch.

The Sox made out well considering ever GM knew they wanted him gone. That being said I think Bay is a moderate upgrade on a daily basis come post season we can only speculate what his #'s will look like. Also Stark is the same guy who took the Rockies in 5 last year, Since than he just makes me laugh.

The Mariners did fine at the deadline. They picked up a young pitcher who has potential to join the rotation, in exchange for a 38 YO Lefty who was out of baseball this time last year. Washburn has a strong presence, and is pitching pretty reasonably, and there is no reason to dump the guy. Ibanez would have made sense to trade, but if there's not a deal to be had, then why make one? Two first round picks will be just fine in exchange for him.

Vidro, Cairo, Batista, and The guy they signed from Minnesota need to go, and room needs to be made for youngsters, but I can assure you no one was willing to take those salaries. No panic buttons were hit, we didn't lose any of our top prospects, and there are some strong pieces to negotiate in offseason deals. This is not a financially crunched team that needs to clear payroll just to stay in business.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.