![]() |
|
|
| |
« Jake Peavy Rumors: Thursday | Main | Mets Eyeing Lowe, Fuentes »
Ken Davidoff of Newsday has some new hot stove info in a blog post.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535b97177970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Davidoff's Latest: Mussina, K-Rod, Manny:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
If the Mets really feel that way about K-Rod, I think it significantly increases the chances he resigns with the Angels. The Mets are really the only interested team that have the cash to back up the interest, unless the Cubs suddenly decided to change course on Wood.
Posted by: AA | October 23, 2008 at 09:10 PM
This is a little shocking to say the least from the mets persepctive. Ususally this team play the role of the mini yankees and spends to the needs they have. K-Rod is like the guy of all the guys they need (or best available). Manny doesnt belong here so thats not shocking. If the mets take this route, they should take on BJ Ryan and Huston Street plus sign a SP like A.J./C.C.(which i doubt) or at least resign perez. Pitching is the highway towards success,a.k.a., the rays now. If the bullpen and starting is not addressed with people who can do the job then why pay all those high salaries to the other stars on the team. It's like going in a bar if your an alcoholic and saying to yourself, Ill be fine as long as I dont see the liquer in front of me. Mets got issues that need to be fixed,period and overpaid/regular paid underachievers arent the answer.
Posted by: puremetsfan | October 23, 2008 at 09:10 PM
"If the Mets really feel that way about K-Rod, I think it significantly increases the chances he resigns with the Angels. The Mets are really the only interested team that have the cash to back up the interest, unless the Cubs suddenly decided to change course on Wood"
Agreed. I don't really see a team like the Cardinals ponying up the cash, and the Cubs probably would just sign Wood, considering the talk that they won't really add payroll.
"If the mets take this route, they should take on BJ Ryan and Huston Street plus sign a SP like A.J./C.C.(which i doubt) or at least resign perez."
I agree that if the Mets decide not to go after K-Rod, and don't sign Fuentes, then going after Street or Ryan in a trade and then a big time pitcher in FA could be an interesting idea. The Mets would likely have to shed some salary in a Ryan trade though if they wanted to add one of those starters, though. Obviously we could go over the whole Delgado-Ryan scenarios but I think most of us have gone over this before.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 23, 2008 at 09:19 PM
"Agreed. I don't really see a team like the Cardinals ponying up the cash, and the Cubs probably would just sign Wood, considering the talk that they won't really add payroll."
I agree about the Cards and I also think they really should give Perez a chance next year, because he really seems to have the stuff and the makeup to handle the role.
With Wood, I also think the Cubs will go beyond his effectiveness and consider his appeal to their fans and organizational loyalty. He showed he can do the job this year and a blister is hardly a sign that his injury issues are back.
If the Mets really are balking at the price, I think K-Rod resigns with the Angels for something like 4 years at $12.5 a year (that was the number he wanted in arbitration) and I think that is perfectly fair in this market.
"I agree that if the Mets decide not to go after K-Rod, and don't sign Fuentes, then going after Street or Ryan in a trade and then a big time pitcher in FA could be an interesting idea."
I have never been a Street fan, but I think he is at least as good an option as Gregg and is at a low value. The question is what kind of package would Beane want. As for Ryan, I would stay away from him. Too much of an arm problem history.
Posted by: AA | October 23, 2008 at 09:30 PM
Mussina would become only the second pitcher to retire after a 20 win season.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 23, 2008 at 09:41 PM
Maybe Mets are looking to acquire a closer via trade...
Posted by: Mistyck | October 23, 2008 at 09:51 PM
"Mussina would become only the second pitcher to retire after a 20 win season."
Really? Who was the other? But you gotta hand it to the guy if he retires now. Going out on your own terms for a pitcher his age isn't usually in the cards.
As for the KRod not being a Met thing... well, I'll believe when I see the coronation of a Mets closer. Though signing someone else like Fuentes is a better choice. It would be ridiculous to spend 15M on a closer, considering Fuentes will probably cost only 10M and will probably give the same production.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 23, 2008 at 10:20 PM
The other was Sandy Koufax, who of course retired at the age of 30 because of arthritis.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 23, 2008 at 10:38 PM
if he does retire im really going to miss him. when he was on he was really fun watch. one of my all time favs.
Posted by: GeneralManager | October 23, 2008 at 10:40 PM
Mets not going after Manny is exciting news for Met fans b/c they need to stop relying on 35+ year old players.
As for K-Rod, he isn't worth 5+ years.
Posted by: icedrake523 | October 23, 2008 at 10:43 PM
If Moose retires now he's likely to have had a not quite good enough for the hall of fame career, similar to where I think Schilling will end up. I think he's in with just one more year like his last one.
Posted by: schellis | October 23, 2008 at 10:43 PM
Even with another meltdown the mets are still solid. They are an outfielder short and they need to move castillo. An eric byrnes for castillo swap would seem to fit both teams. It would allow the D-backs to let o-dog to walk and open up at bats for Tracy. Reworking that bullpen is really all that is needed. The Mets should be in on Fuente and Gregg.
I'm sure all this has been brought up but signings like Manny and K-rod is just a waste.
Posted by: joemorgan=#1 | October 23, 2008 at 11:39 PM
As interest starts to wind down on KRod, do we see someone like the Indians up payroll a few million to sign him? They probably need more than 1 arm for that bullpen, but wouldn't having a competent guy in the 9th help them out a ton?
Posted by: JerseyMuscle17 | October 24, 2008 at 12:01 AM
"The other was Sandy Koufax, who of course retired at the age of 30 because of arthritis."
I should have guessed that... I was betting on Cy Young for the obvious reasons or Mark "The Bird" Fidych for less obvious...
"do we see someone like the Indians up payroll a few million to sign him?"
I'd bet against that. If they make a big splash, I see them more going after Fuentes, otherwise, I see them copying the same moves that made them go after Borowski and trade for Gregg.
Posted by: start_wearing_purple | October 24, 2008 at 12:15 AM
Personally, maybe I am just a little excited WVU just beat Auburn, but Fransisco Rodriguez is not the answer for the Mets. There is no free agent quick fix. Their is no answer. Look at the bullpens that are/were in the playoffs. They are all make shift bullpens with spare parts picked up along the way. We all saw how Billy Wagner turned out while we are watching "Lights out Lidge" pitch for the Phillies, while they only gave up Michael Bourn. Trading for Houston Street may be the start but its not just the closer the whole bullpen needs to be revamped so KROD cannot be a "Quick Fix". Lets Go Mountaineers!
Posted by: wvujose | October 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM
Is it just me or are teams realising that K-Rod (and closers in general) are not worth big money. Besides the declining speed on the fastball, and the fact he always has base runners, K-rod isn't that special to deserve 5 years or 75 million. Not even close.
Look how many guys out there this year have done well enough as a closer while costing at least 70million less.
The saves record is based on the Angels never have big leads. Anyone think Rivera in his prime couldn't have saved that many games had he had the chance?
Look at the Brewers, paid for the big name closer, ended up with a journeyman who did better.
Posted by: quintjs | October 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM
"Is it just me or are teams realising that K-Rod (and closers in general) are not worth big money. Besides the declining speed on the fastball, and the fact he always has base runners, K-rod isn't that special to deserve 5 years or 75 million. Not even close."
K-Rod's decline in velocity is due to his new delivery and emphasis on pitching to contact. He is still extremely effective and now has 4 pitches, which is a lot better than most closers.
"Look at the Brewers, paid for the big name closer, ended up with a journeyman who did better."
Gagne is a totally different story. He has had terrible injury problems and will never the the pitcher he once was. He would be absolutely worth the money if he was the old Gagne.
Posted by: AA | October 24, 2008 at 12:54 AM
I'm a Mets fan and I'm excited that Minaya isn't pursuing Rodriguez and Ramirez.
Posted by: viktor06 | October 24, 2008 at 04:49 AM
Mets fans who claim to be happy that Minaya isn't going after K-Rod (which I don't believe for one second)or Manny (to a lesser degree) are so full of it. The team blew what - 28, 29 saves? And all of a sudden, the team is concerned with spending money (which is a joke in and of itself).
Of course, I wonder how these same Mets fans will spin their feelings if the team did sign K-Rod.
Posted by: tolo316 | October 24, 2008 at 05:48 AM
I have a question I am hoping either Tim or someone here can help me with. When did they change the rules as to what constituted a save? I know at one point you had to pitch to the tieing run but now you can come in with a 3 run lead ( in some circumstances) and get the save. Also - any idea where I can get info on save breakdowns by situation.
Posted by: touchmymonkey | October 24, 2008 at 05:54 AM
Yes, exactly because our bullpen blew 30 save chances, I'd rather sign Cruz, Torres and Beimel and trade for Gregg or BJ Ryan than just sign Rodriguez. As far as LF is concerned, I'm happy with Murphy/Tatis or Evans platoon, so no Manny. Need that cash for a starter.
Posted by: viktor06 | October 24, 2008 at 06:15 AM
Just because the Mets don't think that K-Rod is worth his "Asking Price" doesn't mean that when it's all said and done, that he won't be a Met.
I said all along that the market to give K-Rod a 5/75 contract simply wasn't there. As people have pointed out, the Cubs want to keep Wood, the Angels seem content with Arredondo as an in-house replacement, and the Tigers and Cardinals don't really have the budget room for such a bid. Every other "Large Market" team is locked in at closer. The Mets are the only team with the ability and desperate level of need to put up such a monster bid, and if there's no competition there, why would they?
The Mets can offer 4/50 and probably still be the highest bidders for K-Rod.
Still, My preferred scenario would probably involve a trade of Huston Street and at least 2 other good relievers through FA or Trade.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | October 24, 2008 at 06:52 AM
@ tolo
Mets fans shouldnt be going crazy over the bullpen. I'll bet you ANY amount of money that they could stick with the same guys and have a substantially better year next year. Too many guys performed way below their career numbers, and there's no chance they're as bad next year.
Remember... just 4-5 less blown saves and they are the NL East champs.
Posted by: stellar | October 24, 2008 at 07:39 AM
Manny Ramirez at the right price (high annual salary, fewer years), would probably be the best move the Mets could make. Not because of media/fan presence. How nice to open CitiField with a future HOF and absolute masher in LF.
"I said all along that the market to give K-Rod a 5/75 contract simply wasn't there. As people have pointed out, the Cubs want to keep Wood, the Angels seem content with Arredondo as an in-house replacement, and the Tigers and Cardinals don't really have the budget room for such a bid. Every other "Large Market" team is locked in at closer. The Mets are the only team with the ability and desperate level of need to put up such a monster bid, and if there's no competition there, why would they? "
I don't think 4/50 does it, but it won't get to 5/75. And, I could see a darkhorse in the bidding, see, Francisco Cordero and the Reds.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 24, 2008 at 08:10 AM
stellar-
You have to take into account that the Phillies will also try to make improvements though.
And, bulllpens fluctuate, you are correct. I can show you multiple data points, but I don't think I need to.
But, I don't think the Mets go without signing SOMEBODY. My prediction was one of K-Rod/Manny.
Now that its neither of them, I'm betting its Orlando Hudson. Has to be.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 24, 2008 at 08:30 AM
Orlando Hudson and a pitcher (not CC/Sheets/Burnett though).
Posted by: melonis rex | October 24, 2008 at 08:30 AM
David Wright, Aaron Heilmann, Johnathon Niese & Nick Evans to the Reds for Edwin Encarnacion, Javier Valentin, Johnny Cueto and Co Co Cordero.
The Mets are collecting all of the hispanic / dominican players to go along with their coach and gm.
Cordero is underpriced and this frees up money (Wright's deal) to sign any lost production...ie: Manny. Heilmann is booed even when he goes to take out the garbage...so he is expendable. They give a couple young guys and get back Cueto...who is considered to be a young Pedro.
The Reds get a solid RH bat to put between Bruce and Votto, a RH hitting prospect LF, a young LH pitcher to fill in for Cueto..although I am sure they would rather move Arroyo and Heilmann becomes their 5th pitcher.
Solid deal for both teams although it leaves the Reds searching for a closer...maybe Burton steps up.
Thoughts?
Posted by: heckjeck | October 24, 2008 at 08:35 AM
Although I prefer Fuentes I wouldn't mind the Mets going after K-Rod but thank god they aren't going after Manny. What a waste of payroll spending that would be.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | October 24, 2008 at 08:40 AM
Holy sht someone's ignorant. If I'm Walt Jocketty, I do the deal though.
Wright will easily net you EE and Cueto, and then some.
Heilman, Niese, and Evans for Valentin and Cordero is ridiculously favoring the Reds.
"Cordero is underpriced and this frees up money (Wright's deal) to sign any lost production...ie: Manny. "
1. Cordero is NOT below market value.
2.Wright's contract is team friendly. AKA WELL below market value.
"The Mets are collecting all of the hispanic / dominican players to go along with their coach and gm."
You just lost all your credibility.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 24, 2008 at 08:51 AM
Holy Crap! Stop suggesting a trade of David Wright. It's not going to happen. Period. It's laughable. Game value aside, he's practically the team mascot. Also, Omar is smarter than to give up a 25 year old who consistantly produces over 100 RBI's for the amount of money he's being paid. Imagine what he'll do in the next few years when he's further into his prime. He'll only get more clutch as he gets more used to high pressure situations. Mark my words, if David Wright is traded it will be another trade that Mets fans will be bitching about for years. So yeah, please please please stop even bringing it up.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | October 24, 2008 at 09:15 AM
Whoa whoa whoa. This is crazy. I saw posts saying 12.5MM is fair for K-Rod? I mean I love Jonathan Papelbon and have a lot of respect for Mariano Rivera, but K-Rod is already on the same level as the top two elite closers in the AL. Rivera is currently making 15MM which is fair for being the best closer in baseball history. Papelbon will most certainly command the same kind of contract once eligable. So why is it fair to put the guy who was so effective for the angels and just set the record for most single season saves, and really the only guy with a true shot to break the all time saves record 12.5MM. AT MINIMUM K-rod deserves 4/60MM.
Lets face the facts. In order to win any time soon, the mets need to sign YOUNG talent such as K-rod.
How about peavy? a great option to trade for at below market value that the mets will pass up on. I dont care if you have to get rid of F-mart. This team is not going to win the offensive battle with Philly, and they need to accept that. I'm not saying that the Padres would go through with any trade offered by the Mets as they cant match other offers that may be on the table (not enough quality prospect pitching), but at least give it a shot. If they are going to win in 2009 here are the signings they MUST make
1. Find a way to trade for peavy as your number 2
2. Sign AJ Burnett or Ben Sheets. Pony up the money, they are going to have to to make this team attractive to these players.
3. Sign a big closer, fuentes would do but i'd recommend throwing out 4/60MM to k-rod and see if he gets anything better.
4. pick up the option and TRADE DELGADO WHILE YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO. Yes he had a great 2 months or so and almost single handedly carried the mets into the playoffs. IT WONT HAPPEN AGAIN. At 12MM Delgado would appear a bargain deal for many teams that have hopes he'd put up numbers again. If the mets have to eat up to 2MM to get it done, do it. The mets are moving toward a younger team with the base being wright, reyes and even beltran is like 30.
5. DO NOT under any circumstances resign Oliver Perez. he is not a big game pitcher as he has proven time and time again. hes very inconsistant and the only reason he is going to get money is because boras is his agent. Whoever signs him is going to be very disappointed, mark my words.
So here is the rotation going into 2009 if they follow this pattern
1. santana
2. peavy
3. sheets/burnett
4. maine
5. pelfrey
with a pen featuring either k-rod or fuentes you now have the PITCHING that got the rays to the series this year, the sox to the series last year the diamondbacks to the series multiple times ect. The offense will be ok without delgado, and hopefully they'd move him for another power bat. Preferably one that doesn't strike out or ground into double plays when the game's on the line. If you look at the splits for last season, in the late innings delgado bat under .230. That is unacceptable. The mets are in need of a slugger they can count on with the game on the line, not a slugger they should probably pinch hit for.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | October 24, 2008 at 09:22 AM
I agree they should NOT go after manny though.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | October 24, 2008 at 09:26 AM
and for those who say "oh they would be increasing payroll too much". If they are not willing to spend 30-40MM this offseason, they are basically accepting the current team as a flop and should fire sale.
Posted by: Santana/Beckett FTW | October 24, 2008 at 09:28 AM
Haha, heckjeck, you gotta be kidding.
"David Wright, Aaron Heilmann, Johnathon Niese & Nick Evans to the Reds for Edwin Encarnacion, Javier Valentin, Johnny Cueto and Co Co Cordero."
I wouldn't trade Wright alone for that package.
I wouldn't trade Wright for anything short of a cost-controlled Superstar in return, because that's what Wright is and the Mets are looking to get better next year, not worse. This isn't a rebuilding project man.
The rest of that package could be had in the right deal though.
"The Mets are collecting all of the hispanic / dominican players to go along with their coach and gm."
A ridiculous, and borderline racist argument. The idea Minaya would trade for players specifically because they are hispanic is insane.
Jerry Manuel is African-American, by the way.
"Cordero is underpriced and this frees up money (Wright's deal) to sign any lost production..."
Cordero is definitely not below-market by any means. 12 million a year for a 3.33 ERA and a 1.41 WHIP? No thanks. I would argue any of the FA closers would be a better deal for the Mets.
Also, Wright is due considerably less money next year then Cordero is, so it doesn't free up money, it eats salary.
"Heilmann is booed even when he goes to take out the garbage...so he is expendable. They give a couple young guys and get back Cueto...who is considered to be a young Pedro.
The Reds get a solid RH bat to put between Bruce and Votto, a RH hitting prospect LF, a young LH pitcher to fill in for Cueto..although I am sure they would rather move Arroyo and Heilmann becomes their 5th pitcher."
That's nice, but it would still be a ridiculously bad deal for the Mets. You want to work out something else for those pieces (Without Wright) and I'm listening.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | October 24, 2008 at 09:35 AM
"I have a question I am hoping either Tim or someone here can help me with. When did they change the rules as to what constituted a save? I know at one point you had to pitch to the tieing run but now you can come in with a 3 run lead ( in some circumstances) and get the save."
You earn a save if you are not the pitcher of record, pitch at least 1/3 of an inning, and are the final pitcher for the winning team in one of the following situations:
1) The lead is 3 runs or less
2) The tying run is on deck when you enter the game (say, 5-0 game, bases loaded)
3) You pitch at least 3 innings
Posted by: yanksfan | October 24, 2008 at 09:40 AM
I think the Mets are just trying to put themselves in a good barganing position pending a K-Rod acquisition. Omar might offer something like 4/50 or even lower and eventually meet halfway somewhere. I just can't see them turning down the opportunity for at LEAST a trial bid and see if they're outbid, because I don't think they will be.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | October 24, 2008 at 09:41 AM
Also, I really can't commit to how I feel about Manny. It's tough. IMHO, we should take a chance on either him or Delgado for 2009. I know I'll get poo flung at me for that statement. The team did suffer by depending on too many old men, but the answer to that problem isn't avoiding them altogether.
Posted by: Paulio, Male Gigalo | October 24, 2008 at 09:59 AM
"If Moose retires now he's likely to have had a not quite good enough for the hall of fame career, similar to where I think Schilling will end up. I think he's in with just one more year like his last one."
Really, I doubt that. Hes got his 20 wins and he has 270 wins, he would be able to make it. Schilling has only 220, he isnt in the level of Mussina's. I hope Mussina doesnt retire. I wouldnt at his possition. If he resigns with the Yankees for two years, with their offense he could win 15 games a year.
Posted by: yankfan1 | October 24, 2008 at 09:59 AM
Santana/Beckett FTW
you really think that f-mart would get a peavy deal done. they are looking at a top tier future ace not a centerfeilder. why your at wont dont you sign CC to. i know that these posts are just thoughts but get real dude. you are right about not being to outslug the phillies. you need a closer and a second tier starter.
Posted by: derman1984 | October 24, 2008 at 10:06 AM
I'm not sure why people think that the Mets can't "outslug" the Phillies when the Mets SCORED MORE RUNS THEN THE PHILLIES LAST SEASON, despite the obvious bandbox advantage on their side. The Mets also had a better Rotation ERA. The entire difference last year was in the Bullpens, where Philly ranked 2nd and the Mets ranked 23rd.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | October 24, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Edit: Actually, they scored the same exact amount of Runs, but the point remains the same that Philly's Offense wasn't better this year.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | October 24, 2008 at 10:56 AM
I'll take that Schilling vs Moose bet all day long.
Moose was a very good pitcher for a very long time. He deserves to be in the Hall. Schilling was just slightly better overall with a huge round of bonus points for his post-season performances. Here are their stats.
Schilling - 3261 IP / 3116 K's / 1.137 WHIP / Top 5 ERA for 9 seasons / 6 time All-Star / Post-season dominance (10-2 ... 2.23 ERA ... 133 IP)
Moose - 3562 IP / 2813 K's / 1.192 WHIP / Top 5 ERA for 8 seaons / 5 time All-Star / Good, but not great post-seasons (7-9 ... 3.42 ERA ... 139 IP)
The only area Mussina is actually better than Schilling is wins. As we all know, that's just about the worst stat available to measure a pitchers individual success.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 24, 2008 at 11:05 AM
"Whoa whoa whoa. This is crazy. I saw posts saying 12.5MM is fair for K-Rod? I mean I love Jonathan Papelbon and have a lot of respect for Mariano Rivera, but K-Rod is already on the same level as the top two elite closers in the AL. Rivera is currently making 15MM which is fair for being the best closer in baseball history."
Playoffs.
Since that wonderful run in 2002, K-Rod has been absolutely atrocious in the playoffs. Atrocious atrocious atrocious.
He will probably be getting the Heilman treatment in NY soon after his signing.
And a huge disparity on the value of closers. I don't buy the hype.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 24, 2008 at 11:19 AM