![]() |
|
|
| |
« Elias Rankings - AL Relievers | Main | Odds and Ends: Gillick, Cashman, Burnett »
Next up in our Offseason Outlook series, the Mets. Their likely 2009 commitments:
C - Brian Schneider - $4.9MM
C - Ramon Castro - $2.5MM
1B - Carlos Delgado - $12MM
2B - Luis Castillo - $6MM
SS - Jose Reyes - $5.75MM
3B - David Wright - $7.5MM
IF -
IF - Argenis Reyes - $400K
LF - Dan Murphy - $400K
CF - Carlos Beltran - $18.5MM
RF - Ryan Church - $2MM+
OF - Endy Chavez - $2.05MM
OF - Marlon Anderson - $1.15MM
SP - Johan Santana - $20MM
SP - Mike Pelfrey - $1.3125MM
SP - John Maine - $450K+
SP - Jon Niese - $400K
SP - Bobby Parnell - $400K
RP - Scott Schoeneweis - $3.6MM
RP - Aaron Heilman - $1.2MM+
RP - Pedro Feliciano - $1.025MM+
RP - Duaner Sanchez - $850K+
RP - Brian Stokes - $402K
RP - Joe Smith - $400K
RP - Eddie Kunz - $400K
Other commitments: Billy Wagner - $10.5MM
That's around $104MM committed before arbitration raises to Church, Maine, Heilman, Feliciano, and Sanchez. Some of those relievers may be gone, but we'll put the Mets around $110MM after the raises. They entered 2008 near $138MM, so Omar Minaya could have almost $30MM to spend.
Revamping the bullpen is top priority; we discussed some options here. A commenter on that post made a good point - maybe the Mets can't afford to take the ideal approach to building a bullpen. Overpaying for the sure thing would be justifiable. I'd still sign Brian Fuentes over Francisco Rodriguez though. Fuentes may cost half as much overall while providing a similar performance.
The Mets also need to acquire one starting pitcher. A Randy Wolf type could work, or they could spend additional money for Derek Lowe or A.J. Burnett. Bartolo Colon and Freddy Garcia could also be appealing. With one reliable addition, it'll be a solid rotation.
Murphy provides flexibility - he could be the starting left fielder, he could play first in the event of a Delgado exercise n' trade, or he could replace Castillo at second. It wouldn't be surprising to see the Mets go after Raul Ibanez or Juan Rivera, the somewhat reasonable free agent options at left field. I don't see them getting into the Dunn/Burrell/Manny price range, but you never know.
Castillo is a problem, though I don't think it's imperative the Mets get rid of him. It was a bad signing from Day 1, and Castillo pretty much performed as expected in 2008 (decent OBP, no power, questionable defense, injury issues). That is Luis Castillo and it was a year ago. I suppose you could say his defense was even worse than expected and he missed more time than usual. Maybe he can bounce back next year. I wouldn't assume most of his remaining $18MM just to get Castillo off the roster, but I would entertain swapping him for another bad contract. Heilman is another player who might be trade bait, and he probably has some positive value.
The Mets have an excellent core for '09 - three good starting pitchers plus Wright, Reyes, Beltran, and Delgado all signed at arguably below-market rates. Minaya just needs to figure out how to allocate his money between a closer (and maybe a second reliever), a starter, and a left fielder.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053585db8b970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Offseason Outlook: New York Mets:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
There is no way Parnell will be a starter for Mets...I'm sure Mets will go hard after a SP like Lowe, Burnett, Dempster, perhaps even CC. I personally think they should resign Perez and spend the rest on Cruz and Fuentes, then getting rid of Heilman and Sanchez at least, perhaps even Feliciano. I think they might try to trade for BJ Ryan/Keving Gregg type of arm, with Murphy/Evans/Carp being trade bait. Also I definitely expect them making a HUGE effort to move Castillo, I think Minaya really wants to sign Hudson who could even take a bit of discount to go there
Posted by: viktor06 | October 14, 2008 at 07:44 AM
As a Mets fan, my thoughts are pretty simple.
- Get out of Castillo's and Schoeneweis' contracts by whatever means necessary.
We would need to either eat money or to exchange bad contracts to rid ourselves of Castillo, the rumored Castillo/Byrnes swap would be fine with me.
Schoeneweis might actually have value, he is excellent vs Lefties and is only on a 1 year commitment now. Problem is he offers us nothing that Feliciano doesn't also offer us, and Feliciano is cheaper. We need some crossover pitchers who can face hitters from both sides of the plate, not another OOGY.
- Play Murphy at 2B.
- Unlike most people, I don't think spending on another Superstar for the Offense is necessary, we have a core of 4 hitters that most teams would drool over having, we just need to find the right supporting cast for them. Losing the Automatic out at 2B should be a big Offensive Upgrade in itself anyways.
- Sign a Starting Pitcher. Derek Lowe is ideal, Oliver Perez is my backup plan.
- Take a gamble on an "Injury Risk" starter for the 5th role since you can probably sign them for cheaper. Freddy Garcia is my first choice. Carl Pavano is also someone I'd consider. This way we can go into the year not relying on people like Jonathon Niese, and can allow him more time to develop in the minors.
- Sign/Trade for 3 or 4 relievers, as I said, Huston Street, Jeremy Affeldt, Juan Cruz could all be targets, possibly swap Heilman for another pitcher coming off a bad year like Rafael Betancourt. Promise them all a chance to compete for a closers role to make the Mets more desireable to them. Losers become good set-up men/relievers.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | October 14, 2008 at 08:09 AM
I would like the Mets to go after Lowe and Wolf. Maybe trade Delgado for BJ Ryan and Lyle Overbay and maybe a nother prospect. Then the Mets could sign Brandon Lyons and if Marte becomes a Free-agent go after him.
How about a trade for Matt Holliday? Say F-Mart,Carp,Heilman and a prospect. If Murphy doesn't work out at second, sign Hudson. Then if we could I would trade Beltran,Overbay and Church to the Cubs, for Marmol,Pie,Soriano,Lee,Samardzija & Colvin
1.Reyes-SS
2.Soriano-2B
3.Lee-1B
4.Holliday-RF
5.Wright-3B
6.Burrell-LF
7.Schnieder-C
8.Pie-CF
Posted by: Chris | October 14, 2008 at 08:15 AM
in response to the above comment by CHRIS--
you're insane right? Like clinically proven insane? I am a DIE HARD mets fan my whole 30 years and i LAUGH at some ideas thrown out there.
You're tellin me the Jays will trade their starting 1b, their closer, AND a prospect for a 37 year old 1b/dh they let go a few years back? In the AL East???
Matt Holiday will NOT be traded for that garbage package, that's completely INSANE to think the rox will give up their best player for that ridiculous package.
And my God...Beltran, Overbay and CHurch for 2 of the best young set up men in the game, one of the better, more underrated 1b in Lee, a good young CF who was one of their best prospects in Pie, AND Soriano, a bonafide STUD? Oh AND we're gonna shift soriano back to 2b...lol...I dont even know who Colvin IS, so i'm not even gonna comment.
I REALLY hope this was a joke
This is by far the most assinine "plan" i've ever heard a mets fan come up with. We're all dumber for having read it..i award u no points, and may God have mercy on your soul
Posted by: bigchart333 | October 14, 2008 at 08:38 AM
With the new stadium, I'm pretty sure the Wilpons are raising payroll. I'm not sure by how much though, but I'm betting it's happening. The three big holes are the pen, starting pitching, and LF.
1. Starting pitching.
I think the big word here is depth. Pitching depth is crucial. Either retain Oliver Perez or go after a Derek Lowe type. I wouldn't go after CC Sabathia because having that many years and that much money(especially the years in the Mets' case) tied up in two pitchers is BAD news if one of them does a 360/gets hurt. Let the 5th starter spot be an open competition between Heilman, Niese, Vargas, and possibly bring in an injury-prone guy on an incentive-based deal to put into the mix. Personally, I'd like to see Heilman start, his weakness is the "big inning", and having one bad inning once in a while isn't as bad if you're starting. Also, people need to realize that he could have been pitching through injury this year and his stats this year are an anomaly from those of past years.
Santana-Pelfrey-Perez-Maine-Heilman/FA/Niese.
2. The bullpen.
One needs to realize that signing K-Rod will not be the be all, end all to the Mets bullpen woes. I just see consistently declining peripherals. Just because the player is still really, really good doesn't mean that trends in peripherals should be discounted (see: Zito, Barry). And, Mets fans, he's NOT the 3 up, 3 down kind of guy. There will be baserunners. There will be RISP. And, the nature of the "save" is ridiculous, as you can give up 2 runs with a 3 run lead and still get the save (and K-Rod has done that). And, if all you do is bring in K-Rod
In conclusion, I'm bringing in one proven arm. Either Fuentes via FA, or Ryan (minimal prospect cost), or Street (higher prospect cost, low monetary cost). Show is a LOOGY. I'd also try to hold on to Ayala to set up, and possibly bring in a Juan Cruz, Jeremy Affeldt, and a couple of other mid-level guys. Also, pick up a few struggling guys on minor league deals and give them ST invites. The teams that saw the most improvement in their pens generally aren't the ones who are paying 8MM+ for a closer.
3. Luis Castillo and Left Field.
I am *trying* to dump Luis Castilo if possible, eating salary maybe. However, I don't see it happening, and the Mets might just have to live with him as a bench player.
Orlando Hudson has stated that he wants to play for the Mets. I don't know how much of that is posturization though. And, I'd be hesitant to give him more than 2 years with his injuries and the fact that the Mets still have Castillo on the books. Hudson should only be considered IF Castillo is dumped.
However, I'd rather try to bring in an impact LF and let whoever play 2B (Murphy, perhaps). Always nice to open up the stadium with a new big bat to go along with Wright-Reyes-Beltran. And, he'll have more impact than a Hudson type player will, and the Mets have the money.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 08:44 AM
I think Chris has some good ideas... but instead of keeping Pie and Marmol, the Mets should flip them to Cleveland for Cliff and Sizemore (and a few prospects!). I also disagree with the Delgado trade. The Mets should also get Halladay.
Posted by: pollcatfactor | October 14, 2008 at 08:49 AM
ADropOFVenom-
One question. Since you are a Mets fan, what prospects would you put on the table as possible trade chips to net relievers(namely Street and Ryan)? Which ones are untouchable?
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 08:50 AM
Chris--
1. Delgado for BJ Ryan straight up is a bad deal for the Jays, since Delgado is a 1yr rental and the Jays probably won't compete in that tough AL East next year.
Beltran will NOT be traded. Especially to the Cubs/anyone for a package centered around Marmol, a reliever. I thought this was covered in the other Mets closer entry.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 08:56 AM
1. randy wolf? please. are we following the yankees' way that if they're good enough to beat us, they're good enough to join us (and then stink)
2. why are we already pencilling in daniel murphy's name at second when we don't know if he can field the position yet? with carlos delgado back at first, it's imperative the second baseman have the range not only to cover second but to also cheat and get balls that a better fielding first baseman could get to.
3. are there even 3 or 4 good relievers available for the mets to sign or trade for?
i don't see the mets going for ibanez although i undestand your thought process. the mets are in dire need of a right handed power bat. i could see rivera fitting the mold more than ibanez. add in the fact he's a former expo and undervalued means he would be most likely an omar minaya special.
Posted by: FranzFerdinand | October 14, 2008 at 08:56 AM
i like melonis' ideas. dude, i thought you weren't a met fan.
Posted by: FranzFerdinand | October 14, 2008 at 08:58 AM
"Then if we could I would trade Beltran,Overbay and Church to the Cubs, for Marmol,Pie,Soriano,Lee,Samardzija & Colvin"
ROFL!!!
As a Cub fan my first reaction was no way should we trade half of our bullpen and half of our offense for Carlos Beltran, but hey, you threw in Church and Overbay (who you don't even have yet btw) so yeah, that's worth it.
Maybe the Cubs can trade the Mets DLee for Reyes, Wright and FMart and Pelfrey. Seriously, we'll throw in Reed Johnson and Neal Cotts. Deal???
Posted by: pageian | October 14, 2008 at 09:04 AM
C - Brian Schneider
C - Ramon Castro
1B - Carlos Delgado
2B - David Eckstein*
SS - Jose Reyes
3B - David Wright
IF - Fernando Tatis
IF - Argenis Reyes
LF - Eric Byrnes**
CF - Carlos Beltran
RF - Ryan Church
OF - Endy Chavez
OF - Nick Evans
SP - Johan Santana
SP - Mike Pelfrey
SP - John Maine
SP - Oliver Perez
SP - Jon Niese
SP- Bartolo Colon*
RP - JJ Putz**
RP - Jeremy Affeldt*
RP - Pedro Feliciano
RP - Juan Cruz*
RP - Bobby Parnell
RP - Joe Smith
RP - Eddie Kunz
*- free agent acquisitions
David Eckstein, Bartolo Colon, Jeremy Affeldt, Juan Cruz
**-player acquired via trade
NYM: JJ Putz CP
SEA: Dan Murphy OF/IF, Aaron HeilmanSP/RP, Carlos MunizRP, Angel PaganOF
NYM: Eric ByrnesOF
ARI: Luis Castillo 2B
Posted by: BaseballFanatic40 | October 14, 2008 at 09:15 AM
"ADropOFVenom-
One question. Since you are a Mets fan, what prospects would you put on the table as possible trade chips to net relievers(namely Street and Ryan)? Which ones are untouchable?"
Unless someone like Joakim Soria becomes available...
Any prospect in the upper levels of our minors not named Fernando Martinez or Daniel Murphy are available in my mind. 2 (Possibly 3) of Jonathon Niese, Nick Evans, Mike Carp, Bobby Parnell, Eddie Kunz, Dillon Gee, Dylan Owen, Shawn Bowman, Michael Antonini is the group I'm hoping to pry away Huston Street with. I suspect Billy Beane would find enough in there that interests him.
From the Major League Roster, not much would be available (For obvious reasons, teams looking to win next season rarely are selling good chips), Luis Castillo, Aaron Heilman, Scott Schoeneweis, Duaner Sanchez could all be had, I would consider dealing Ryan Church if there's a significant enough player coming in return, otherwise I'm not looking to tear up the core of this team.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | October 14, 2008 at 09:16 AM
eckstein stinks. next.
Posted by: FranzFerdinand | October 14, 2008 at 09:21 AM
franzferdinand
then tell me who you would like at 2B and dont say some unrealistic bullsh!t like Orlando Hudson or Rafael Furcal.... maybe Mark Ellis who is a free agent could work on a 2 year deal
Posted by: BaseballFanatic40 | October 14, 2008 at 09:32 AM
who said i wanted either one of those guys? i'd take mark ellis if he came cheap. i'm not averse to murphy playing second base but let's not underestimate the importance of the position defensively especially when you consider the limited range you get at first. murphy's not exactly the guy you count on for world-class range
Posted by: FranzFerdinand | October 14, 2008 at 09:57 AM
- Do not sign Manny Ramirez. First, the Mets offense is already really good as it is now. They got 350 RBIs out of their 3, 4 and 5 hitters in 2008. Improving pitching should be any teams number one priotity, ESPECIALLY for the Mets considering what happened this year. Second, he brings way too much drama with him and will be a plague on the team by 2011-2012 if he gets the deal he wants. Third, He is just as bad if not worse defensively than Murphy/Tatis. And fourth, there will be plenty of good bats at LF on the market during 2009 and the following offseason if the Mets don't make a mid-season trade, (Bay, Nady, Crawford, Holliday, etc.) all of which are younger and will cost less than Manny.
- Liquidate Castillo by any means necessary. Throw him in a package with Evans for next to nothing. An RP will do. It's OK if the Mets get the shaft on the trade just GET RID OF HIM AND HIS HORRIBLE CONTRACT!
- Obviously some of those RP need to go. Heilman and Sanchez are must trades. Trade them for anything, preferably RP, and preferably during the offseason. Trading Schoenweiss might be a little more difficult as he carries a $3.6M salary with him. If we can somehow liquidate Castillo without throwing in Evans, trade Heilman/Evans/Porspect for Huston Street.
- Have Murphy and Tatis platoon LF.
- Have someone in the farm system be the 5th starter. Neise stands out the most but there are other options.
- Sign Orlando Hudson for around ~10M a year.
- Sign Derek Lowe for around ~10-15M a year.
- Sign K-Rod or Brian Fuentes for around ~10-15M a year. I'd prefer Fuentes but wouldn't mind K-Rod.
- Sign Darren Oliver or Jeremy Affeldt for around ~2-4M a year. I'd prefer Oliver as he's cheaper.
-----
...Which leaves the Mets with a ~$140-145 million payroll and on opening day this lineup...
C - Schneider
1B - Delgado
2B - Hudson
SS - Reyes
3B - Wright
LF - Murphy/Tatis
CF - Beltran
RF - Church
C - Castro
IF - Easely
IF - A. Reyes
OF - Chavez
OF - Anderson
OF - Murphy/Tatis
SP - Santana
SP - Lowe
SP - Maine
SP - Pelfrey
SP - Neise or Other Minor Leaguer
CL - K-Rod or Fuentes
RP - Oliver or Affeldt
RP - Feliciano
RP - Smith
RP - Stokes
RP - RP traded for Castillo/Evans/Heilman/Sanchez/Schoenweiss
RP - RP traded for Castillo/Evans/Heilman/Sanchez/Schoenweiss
-----
- Should Delgado have another miserable first half without turning it around as he did last year, trade him in a package with some prospects for an OF, preferably an LF, and move Murphy to 1B.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | October 14, 2008 at 10:03 AM
BaseballFanatic40 - I have to believe Putz would cost a lot more than that. What interest would the Mariners have in Pagan or Heilman? Maybe a little, but Putz is an elite closer when healthy. None of the guys you suggest are particularly valuable.
Here is my suggestion: Luis Castillo for Andruw Jones. Castillo gives the Dodgers another 2nd base option and spreads out the bad contract. Jones gives the Mets another OF option who is really playing to resurrect his career and for another contract. He would have to play LF or RF though, the Mets wouldn't move Beltran to accomodate Jones.
Juan Pierre would be another option, but I can't imagine the Mets having any interest there.
Posted by: mymrbig | October 14, 2008 at 10:03 AM
How about a trade for Matt Holliday? Say F-Mart,Carp,Heilman and a prospect
its going to take more than one outfeild prospect, a bum reliever and someone i never heard and another prospect to get holliday. i love how mets fans just come up with these ridulcious trade offers for superstars for bums. it would take niese f-mart to start and probably a major league ready pitcher, maybe maine to get holliday from the rockies.
Posted by: derman1984 | October 14, 2008 at 10:05 AM
It would obviously be nice to plug in a bat like Murphy at 2B. That's far from a shoe-in though. I heard Ed Coleman say that he doesn't think he has the ability to play 2B
They are having him work on it in the fall to provide flexibility, but he's always been a corner guy. I'd keep him in LF, personally
Posted by: wayne gomes | October 14, 2008 at 10:08 AM
I don't see Daniel Murphy as a second baseman at all, but I guess only time will tell if he could handle playing the position in the Arizona Fall League. I like Murphy but he was ranked only as high as #9 in the Mets prospects list and I wouldn't be surprised if he got exposed next season as a hitter. I'm not buying the hype until I see him for a full season.
How about picking up Freddy Sanchez in a deal with Pittsburgh to play second base after Castillo gets dealt for a box of paper clips?
Posted by: MattyMets | October 14, 2008 at 10:15 AM
#1 omar doesn't think Murphy is a 2b he referred to him as a LF/1b. The decision for murphy to play 2b in the Arizona fall league was decided on before he had his first major league AB.
#2 The mets should sign manny/adam dunn/milton bradley to play left field. Fernando martinez is far from being ready to play in a platoon role on the major league level. And Ryan church is a good solid everyday player but hes not good enough to overcome the automatic outs we had at 2b and catcher this year. Bottom line we need another masher.
#3 I think Luis castillo has a 25% chance of being moved other than that look for some type of platoon at 2b next season starring castillo/argenis reyes/easley.
#3 The Pen. Beg , borrow and steal. Go out and sign/trade for 4 rps. I trade feliciano or schoenwiess because we cant have 2 lefty specialist considering schoe gets murdered against righties. Let parnell get his feet wet in the pen this year. He doesnt have to be with the team at the start of season but should get a chance for most of the season.
1-Jose Reyes ss
2-Ryan Church RF
3-David Wright 3b
4-Carlos Beltran CF
5-Manny/Dunn/Bradley LF
6-Carlos Delgado 1b
7-2b platoon
8-castro/schneider C
Chavez
Easley
Tatis
Murphy
argenis reyes
1-Johan
2-Maine
3-Pelfrey
4-Lowe
5-Journeyman
fuentes
ayala
feliciano/schoe
smith
duaner sanchez
juan cruz
some type of long man
Ideally i want the wilpons to add 10 million to last years payroll. But that will not happen. But 20 million on the pen revamp isnt out of the question if we sign fuentes
Posted by: iloveraykim | October 14, 2008 at 10:32 AM
Murphy really only has to be 'tolerable' in the field in order to be a significant upgrade.
Castillo and Easley combined (Granted, due to injuries) had by far the worst range of any 2B in the league last season, so it's not exactly like the bar is high for Daniel Murphy to have to upgrade over that.
I would be more then happy if Murphy was just slightly below-average defensively next season, with the hope of eventually becoming average, as even that is an upgrade Defensively, and because with his bat he would be a Top 10 2B Offensively.
As for Heilman and Sanchez, I wouldn't just give them away. They have 3 things working for them, they have shown the ability to be successful in the past, they are still cheap (Should combine for under 4 million in arbitration), and even last year they were still good situationally, they were just overused/misused because the Mets didn't have a true set-up man. If I don't get decent value for them, I'm holding onto them and letting them compete for a job next season. Worst case is we end up cutting them then.
Posted by: AdropOFvenom | October 14, 2008 at 10:40 AM
I've been watching most of the AFL games, and murphy actually looks pretty good at 2nd. His range isn't great, but his glove is solid, he's got a better than average arm, and he turns the double play well. Most of the mets staff are flyball pitchers anyway, so I think he'll be fine there.
Posted by: SkiBolton | October 14, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Jays fan here.
Considering Toronto's depth in their bullpen, Ryan is certainly expendable.
As mentioned earlier, there is no way the Jays do Overbay + Ryan + prospect for Delgado. As one poster mentioned above me, even Ryan straight up wouldn't make much sense for 1 year of Delgado.
Mets fans, what do you guys think of:
Ryan for Delgado + Heilman?
I'm sure Toronto would be willing to take a shot on Heilman and have Arnsberg work with him as a reclamation project. Plus, considering their complete mess of a starting rotation, having a pitcher with prior starting experience wouldn't hurt either.
Posted by: Acekicker123 | October 14, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Thoughts from a Phils fan that watches a ton of Mets:
I think you can get a decent starting OF or 2B for a package centered around Heilman. Someone like a Mark Teahen or a Freddy Sanchez (mentioned above by someone). He has to go, he's just mentally not up to pitching in NY
D Sanchez is toast. 85-88 with his fastball nullifies that change. I'd let him go
Schoenweis and Feliciano are servicable, but they fill the same role. Neither is really effective against RH. I'd move one...Feliciano probably more marketable, but better. Rincon could replace whoever goes and probably approximate the production
I'd sign Fuentes. You could probably get him for 3 years (although probably have to pay Lidge money). Matches up really well against Utley and Howard.
I'd have to strongly consider playing the inflated price for Perez. You know he's not consistent enough to be objectively worth it, but he's a talented guy. Dominated Phils and Braves this year. Still young, which is better than overpaying for 34 year old Lowe. No extensive injury history
I'd also explore a trade for Magglio Ordonez. Probably have to give up some quality, but I think he's gettable with his salary. I think he'd be an excellent 3 hitter. Reyes, Beltran, Mags, Wright, Delgado is very formidable
Posted by: wayne gomes | October 14, 2008 at 10:57 AM
acekicker, where do i sign?
Posted by: FranzFerdinand | October 14, 2008 at 11:01 AM
i love the mets fans trying to get to where the Phils are. Enjoy the view from down there!!! Until you get players with heart like Victorino, Utley, Rollins etc you will NEVER win the division much less anything else. $pend all the money you want, it won't help!!
Oh and i especially enjoy all the fans making all these wild trades and signings. Its honestly very comical, thanks!
Posted by: philsWSchamps | October 14, 2008 at 11:03 AM
This love affair with Brian Fuentes is amazing. I get a kick out of comments like, "Well we should sign Fuentes. If he's gone I guess we could get K-Rod."
Have you really looked at Brian Fuentes? Ever studied the guys numbers?
Let's start with the obvious, he will be 33 next year. No spring chicken.
Next, he has closed for 4 years. During that time he has converted 85% of his save opportunities.
By year, here is his other key stats:
2005 - ERA=2.91 - OPS=684 - K/9=11.02
2006 - ERA=3.44 - OPS=673 - K/9=10.06
2007 - ERA=3.08 - OPS=622 - K/9=8.22
2008 - ERA=2.73 - OPS=570 - K/9=11.78
K-Rod during those same years posted:
2005 - ERA=2.67 - OPS=591 - K/9=12.16
2006 - ERA=1.73 - OPS=609 - K/9=12.08
2007 - ERA=2.81 - OPS=605 - K/9=12.03
2008 - ERA=2.24 - OPS=630 - K/9=10.14
K-Rod has posted better ERA's every year, better OPS against 3 out of 4 years and better K/9 3 out of 4 years. Oh, and K-Rod has converted 90% of his save opportunities (which comes out to an additional 2 wins in a 40 save season) and will be 27 next year, 6 years the junior to Fuentes.
If reports are to be believed Fuentes is looking for a Lidge like deal (4/50 - club option on the 4th year) Fuentes won't be cheap. On the high end, K-Rod is hoping for 5/75. Everyone knows that K-Rod won't get that. But just to play devil's advocate, let's say he does.
So, you have a choice, pay an inferior 33 year old $12m/year for 4 years or a superior 27 year old $15m/year for 5 years.
Fuentes is a fine closer. He will be an upgrade for most teams that go after him. I happen to think that he is not as valuable as K-Rod, especially if the gap is only a few extra million and one additional year. By the time K-Rod's contract expires he will still be younger than Fuentes is right now.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 14, 2008 at 11:07 AM
"There is no way Parnell will be a starter for Mets."
I think that Tim bases his roster--i.e. who fills each position--on who is likely under contract and/or team control for 2009 as of the day he writes it. And, since Pedro Martinez and Oliver Perez are both free agents, then Parnell gets the 5th starter spot for now(although yes, that will likely change.)
I'd personally love it if the Mets sign Raul Ibanez to fill one of the corner outfield spots. Then the M's could snag the #25 pick in the first round of next year's draft. And if they don't end up signing Joshua Fields, then they'll have the #22 pick as well. Cool. :)
Posted by: StarryEyed | October 14, 2008 at 11:11 AM
Or, that is to say, Martinez and Perez are going to be free agents this offseason, but they aren't as of the writing of this post.
But they both likely will be. :)
Posted by: StarryEyed | October 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM
''I think you can get a decent starting OF or 2B for a package centered around Heilman. Someone like a Mark Teahen or a Freddy Sanchez (mentioned above by someone). He has to go, he's just mentally not up to pitching in NY''
I can't agree with you more. I know Heilman has a lot of talent, but you could tell that the guy agonized every time he took the mound at Shea. Between the cursing in his glove and that ''hey, you just stole my girlfriend!'' sad look, I can't stand seeing him pitch another minute for this team. I have no doubt that he will thrive elsewhere, but some players just have to make a move in order to reach their potential. I think starting for a lower-level team like Pittsburgh or Kansas City would do wonders for him.
I still say Freddy Sanchez for Heilman (and whatever else, I guess) is a good move. Sanchez could flat out hit from the right side and he is a doubles machine.
Posted by: MattyMets | October 14, 2008 at 11:14 AM
Haha sounds good Franz.
Toronto badly needs a power bat, and Ryan seems to be their most expendable trade chip in order to do so.
Toronto had 6 bullpen arms with sub 3 ERA's last season.
They could easily move Downs (1.78 ERA) into a closer role and still have three dynamite setup men in Carlson (2.25 ERA), League (2.18 ERA)and Accardo coming back from injury (2.14 ERA with 30 SV's in '07).
Moving Ryan and his $10M salary for a power bat for the DH spot and a reliever/starter with a track record of success and decent upside would be a solid move.
That way, they could throw all of their remaining cash into the starter's market.
Posted by: Acekicker123 | October 14, 2008 at 11:20 AM
Here is what 1 NYM fan, born and raised in queens, wants for his 2009 team:
C - Brian Schneider
C - Ramon Castro
1B - Carlos Delgado
2B - O. Hudson
SS - Jose Reyes
3B - David Wright
IF - Willie Bloomquist
IF - Fernando Tatis
LF - Adum Dunn
CF - Carlos Beltran
RF - Ryan Church
OF - Endy Chavez
OF - Marlon Anderson
SP - Johan Santana
SP - Mike Pelfrey
SP - John Maine
SP - Carlos Silva
SP - John Niese
RP - Luis Ayala
RP - Ricardo Rincon
RP - Pedro Feliciano
RP - Duaner Sanchez
RP - Brian Stokes
RP - Joe Smith
RP - Brandon Lyons
FA Signings:
O. Hudson - 2 yrs/14 M - he wants to be here so badly, he takes a small discount
A. Dunn - 4 yrs/75 M - He plays left this year, moves to 1B afterward (have you seen the horrible FA at 1b for 2009)
W. Bloomquist - 2 yrs/5 mil - Can play anywhere, will finally give reyes/wright days off
L. Ayala & R. Rincon - 1 yr/1.5 M w/ option year - Reliable guys
B. Lyon - 3 yrs/ 15 M - Hey, this team made WS with Benitez as closer
Trades:
Hielman to Pit for any AA player
Schoeneweis & Castillo to SEA for Silva
Minor Moves - Sign Sergio Mitre & Bartolo Colon to AAA deals, with invite to spring training, let them fight with Neise for 5th spot. Keep Munz, Muniz in minors for injury callups. Have Murphy play 2b for the two years hudson is here, he will still be very young, but better defensively. Have Evans play LF in AA, Martinez LF in AAA, the can fight over position for 2010 team!
Posted by: MetsFan5_7 | October 14, 2008 at 11:35 AM
"Until you get players with heart like Victorino, Utley, Rollins etc you will NEVER win the division much less anything else."
Yeah, he told you Met fans. You see, Victorino's "heart" had a .900 OPS this year, and Beltran's "heart" only had a .700 OPS. "Heart" is what wins games, not talent. Take that, 2nd place team!!!
I guess when your team wins the division you're entitled to say anything you want, whether it makes sense or not.
Posted by: pageian | October 14, 2008 at 11:43 AM
bjsguess - no mention that Fuentes pitched 1/2 his games at Coors while K-Rod pitched at sea level? Or that K-Rod walks an extra batter per 9 innings, thereby allowing more baserunners (despite the OPS-against difference)? Or that Fuentes' OPS against has actually improved the last 4 years while K-Rod's has gone the wrong way? Or that K-Rod's K/9 have decreased 5 straight years while his AVG-against has increased 5 straight years? Or that K-Rod's fastball velocity declined from 94.8 mph in 2006 to 93.6 mph in 2007 to 91.9 mph in 2008 (Fuentes was at 91.6 mph this year)? You are cherry-picking your stats and its kind of embarassing. Thanks for playing though.
Both are good closers who will be overpaid. I would rather "overpay" Fuentes with fewer seasons and a lower annual salary when he has been remarkably consistent pitching in a tough environment and has not shown any recent signs of decline, despite being older than K-Rod. But that is just me.
Posted by: mymrbig | October 14, 2008 at 11:47 AM
Carlos Silva? Not for nothing, but the Castillo and Schoeneweis contracts aren't THAT bad that we need to take on Carlos Silva. He is an absolute disaster.
For the record, Jarrod Washburn is in the last year of his contract and he is making a lot of money. He could be a throw-in in a deal involving Putz if you really want to throw away contracts that badly.
But I love Adam Dunn for this team as well, whether or not Delgado stays. I think part of why Philadelphia is such a dangerous team is because of Pat Burrell's .400 OBP every year behind the first four hitters in the lineup. That lineup never lets up. Dunn would serve that same purpose on this team to go along with 40 homers a year. His defense wouldn't be as intolerable with Beltran covering plenty of ground out there and the possibility of Endy Chavez as a late-inning replacement.
I personally think he is a solid replacement for Delgado with Daniel Murphy and Dunn being interchangeable between first and left field and the team getting younger without Delgado, but that's just me.
Of course the kicker here is Wayne Krivsky, who would spew all of the propaganda in the world into Omar Minaya's ears convincing him not to sign Dunn.
Posted by: MattyMets | October 14, 2008 at 11:47 AM
haha pageian,
i don't think i ever said that Victorino was a better player overall that Beltran did I???
That being said it was Victorino that hit a grand slam off of Sabbathia in the NLDS and he tied the game last night if you weren't watching off of Wade. Trust me I'm very happy with the way my team is constituted right now and next year and in the near future, our deficencies are about to be taken care of. Carlos Carrasco will be in our rotation next year along with Lou Marson at catcher splitting time with Ruiz. We do have 17 arb eligible players to contend with but if we can spend a little $$$ then we'll be just fine.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | October 14, 2008 at 11:56 AM
Guys, Mark Ellis would be a horrible fit in NY. Not because he'd be a bad signing, but he would be cauterized for his streaky hitting. I love Ellis. Having him at 2B really helped the young A's staff this year. The NY media would eat him alive. The media looks more at offense than defense. Ellis is a primarily defensive player---not much of an offensive improvement at this stage of his career over Castillo, although a HUGE defensive improvement. But, guys, he is a streaky hitter.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 12:04 PM
come on guys, you know you're getting Pat Burrell...
Posted by: baxter | October 14, 2008 at 12:06 PM
"i like melonis' ideas. dude, i thought you weren't a met fan."
I'm not. Being sick and lethargic means more time on MLBTR and other sites. And more rant-like posts. And, there really isn't anything brewing involving my team right now.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 12:10 PM
I like two of the ideas that have been thrown about here kind of under the radar.
1. I think Juan Cruz would be a real good addition to this bullpen. I see him as under rated and has an off chance to be a good closer.
2. I like and have always liked Sergio Mitre. Sign him to a AAA deal.
Those two moves cost very little, and could end up helping a lot. I'll leave the big changes to you Mets fans...but I'd start with those moves.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | October 14, 2008 at 12:13 PM
The mets need a drastic overhaul. What do the 4 teams left in the playoffs have in common? They have excellent bullpens and have bats at most positions. The Mets line-up last year had anywhere from 3-4 holes, not counting the pitchers spot, on any given night. 2nd Base and catcher were horrific and the corner outfield spots were a guessing game. Don't get me wrong, Church was great early on and Tatis and Murphy provided solid play but for most of the season we had no idea what kind of production we would get out of those spots. It showed in the later innings when the Mets were tragically unable to tack on runs. The "core" guys got pitched around for the most part and games were being decided by a group of guys that might not even make an expansion team.The bullpen issue can not be stressed enough. It seems like everyone agrees on that point though...Even the rotation has huge issues...remember 06...Oliver Perez and John Maine starting key games in the playoffs...Steve Trachsel not even wanting to pitch...well at the end of the season we had a similar situation. Let's say they had ended up tied with Milwaukee and played the monday game. Pelfrey pitched Friday, Santana was brought back on 3 days rest to pitch saturday and Perez on three days rest to pitch sunday. Who is starting? Brandon Knight...Pedro, who is absolutely done...or maybe they could get a one game appearance by Duque.
The team is built poorly, and major changes need to be made, that is if this team is going to be a championship contender. We can continue to go on like this, plugging 4 field positions, 2-3 spots in the rotation and the entire bullpen with question marks and hoping that they come through but we've seen that approach is probably only good for 88 wins. 06 was an aberration...LoDuca, Valentin put up all star nubmers...the chances of finding scrap heap guys to do that again is slim.
That being said, the only guys that I think should be untouchable on this team are David Wright, Johan Santana and Mike Pelfrey. Eveyone else, and yes I mean everyone should be expendable. It's the only way that the team can take a step forward. All these trades using Niese and Martinez to get you guys like Holliday (who by the way should re-sign with Colorado...look at his home/road splits)are pipe dreams. Martinez is a good prospect, but I don't see teams falling all over themselves to get a shot at him. People that are thinking of trading Heilman for anything other than a struggling reliever, a mid level prospect or someone a team has given up on are deluding themselves. GM's watch games too...at this point Heilman is nothing but a righty specialist...with no heart.
In order for this team to take a big step forward, they need to start thinking about moving some stars. A package around Beltran (notice...a package...Beltran plus something else of value) to the white sox for Swisher, Dye and Jenks would serve a few purposes. Swisher is better than he played last season, he can play multiple positions an he's young. Dye is the right handed bat the Mets need in the line-up and Jenks is a solid reliever with big game experience. Whatever offense is lost with Beltran going would be made up for by Swisher and Dye. I know they are still in it, but I would explore a package around Reyes to the Dodgers for a few of their young performers...I love Kemp, Loney, Broxton, Martin and Billingley. If you package Reyes with something of value you can probably pry 2 or 3 of those guys away, maybe even package Castillo with it and take back a bad contract like Juan Pierre or Jason Schmidt. Delgado only makes sense for a few teams like the Blue Jays and D-backs that are ridiculously defficient offensively and he can be packaged to obtain value too...Chris Shnyder and Chad Qualls from the D-Backs would be solid chips. I would love to grab Shnyder outside of a Delgado trade as well, he's got an .800 plus OPS and is only 27...in addition their are a lot of guys that could be had in low cost trades that I would like to see the Mets take a shot on...Edwin Jackson...Daniel Cabrera, if they don't work out as starters, try them in the bullpen...look at what JP Howell is doing for the Rays. I would rather see them take chances on young guys with upside than old guys like Martinez, Duque, Castillo, Alou...do I need to continue?
I'm not saying that these trades should all be made or any of them for that matter...I just through out some ideas of the type of moves that could be made to change the make-up of this team and this team drastically needs a shake-up. They came out flat last year and needed to have the manager fired to get going...let's not make the same mistake again. If I had my way we might bring back 10 of the 25 guys on the roster.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 12:19 PM
I like the idea of a Carlos Delgado and Aaron Heilman for Ryan and Overbay.
The Mets get a solid Delgado replacement and a potentially dominant closer, and the Jays add a middle of the order bat as well as another potentially quality reliever who could get a shot in the rotation possibly.
I also think that the Mets should definitely look into the rumored Castillo-Byrnes swap, his grit would be perfect for the Mets, and his upside is far more than that of Castillo.
If they can't make that deal, then they should definitely to after Juan Rivera. I just think that the Mets definitely need to focus on adding another starter and a closer, and tv money would be better spent on pitching than on another bat for an already solid lineup.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 12:45 PM
ChicoWalker- Catcher is not an offensive black hole. Defense is MUCH MORE VALUED than offense at the catcher's spot. I mean, the guy needs to be servicable with the bat and not downright godawful horrible, but low offense from the catcher spot is decent. I want a guy who can call games well and be a rock for that pitching staff. That being said, Schnieder is not a black hole. And, the Mets aren't getting an offensive catcher (no, Pudge doesn't count, his bat is declining), because most of them (Mauer, McCann, Martin, Soto, etc.) are untouchable. The only catcher I'd target if I wanted to improve is possibly Benjie Molina of the Giants, possibly using Murphy, Evans, Carp, etc. as the centerpiece of such a trade.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 12:54 PM
I shouldn't criticize others without throwing my thoughts out there.
(1) Trade Luis Castillo for Andruw Jones. Throw in a couple million for this year if you need to. At least Andruw Jones has something to play for (his next contract) and will be off the book after 2009. Maybe Jones doesn't work out, but its not like the Mets want Castillo around or Jones will help the Dodgers next year.
(2) Sign Mark Grudzielanek to a 1 year, $5 million contract.
I really like Orlando Hudson, but I think the Mets should avoid him. Of course, I think he will get $40 million over 4 years, so if they can get him for less than he might be a good signing. Hudson has been undervalued in many ways, but I have 2 concerns. (1) his home/road splits and (2) his defense has been slowly sliding.
Arizona has one of the best hitter parks in the league and Hudson has had huge splits the past few years.
Home 2006: .321/.397/.489
Home 2007: .302/.382/.511
Home 2008: .326/.403/.536
Away 2006: .254/.313/.421
Away 2007: .286/.370/.369
Away 2008: .288/.337/.381
The difference in his power numbers really stands out.
His defensive numbers have been is steady decline. Look at these numbers for the last 5 years:
Range Factor (ESPN): 5.80->5.84->5.48->4.91->4.82
Zone Rating (ESPN): .830->.839->.809->.814->.790
Revised Zone Rating (THT): .841->.853->.790->.798->.784
And 2nd baseman have a history of aging poorly. He might be Luis Castillo in 2 years!!!
So if Murphy can handle 2nd, give him a try. Otherwise, bring in Grudzielanek. Because of his age, he would probably accept a 1-year deal. But despite his age, he has been remarkably consistent on offense (right around .300/.340/.410 the last 3 years) and defense (RZR around .840, RF around 4.90, and ZR around .830 each of the last 3 years).
I trust Grudielanek on a 1 year, $5 million deal much more than Hudson on a 4 year, $40 million deal. Hudson has more potential to be an impact player at 2nd base, but he also has more potential to be a horribly regrettable contract in a few years.
(3) Rebuild the bullpen without signing Fuentes or K-Rod. I would try to sign Affeldt & Howry and then look for guys in the Rule 5 draft.
I think Affeldt is good enough to close and he won't cost a 1st round pick. Offer him a 3-year, $9 million contract with incentives based on games finished and promise him first shot at closing. If he doesn't end up closing, then his contract is fair for a good set-up man. If he closes, then even with a couple million in incentives he is a decent deal. He's had good numbers the last 2 years pitching in Coors and Great American. Had some HR problems at Great American this year, but everything else he did was excellent.
Look hard at the Rule 5 draft for some live arms. Be willing to take a couple chances if there is 40-man roster space.
Also try to sign Bob Howry to a 1-year deal. His 5.35 ERA is ugly, ugly, ugly. But his K/9, BB/9, and GB/FB rates were all in line with his past few seasons. His inflated ERA looks like a combination of bad luck (.354 BABIP) and fluky HR (11.7% HR/FB rate was much higher than prior seasons). Maybe he is a bust, but he's worth the risk of a 1-year commitment.
(4) Try and sign Lowe to a 3-year, $50 million contract with a vesting option based on innings pitched (350 innings in 2010-2011 or 540 innings for 2009-2011). The Mets overpay by a couple million for 3 years, but avoid the 4th year unless he stays very healthy. Lowe has pitching in the spot light plenty and hasn't shown any signs of decline. You can never have too much starting pitching, but it is much better to pay for a more dependable big name than overpay #4/#5 types that might totally fail (Batista, Washburn, Pavano, Marquis, etc.).
(5) Sign Juan Rivera to a 2-year, $8 million contract (pay a little more if needed). He can handle LF or RF, is a career .284/.331/.468 hitter who just never got a chance to start consistently. Compliments Church well if a platoon is needed, but both deserve a chance to start. This would leave Murphy as a super-utility guy, potentially getting some at-bats at 2nd and both OF corners. I like the OF depth between Church's concussion problems, Murphy's inexperience, and Beltran's knees.
(6) Take a flyer on one of the experienced, injured SP to push Niese and challenge for the #5 spot. Maybe Colon or Jennings (if healthy). Another option might be trying to nab Pettite or Mussina if the Yankees don't bring them back but they are willing to take a 1-year deal to stay in NY.
C - Schneider/Castro
1B - Delgado
2B - Grudielanek
SS - Reyes
3B - Wright
LF - Rivera
CF - Beltran
RF - Church
SP - Santana, Lowe, Maine, Pelfrey, Niese/FA
RP - Affeldt, Howry, Heilman (I'm still a believer, he was actually throwing harder than usual which makes me think he needs to ease up a little to improve his command), Smith, Schoenweis, Feliciano, etc.
The rotation has a great top 4 with some depth to compete at #5. The lineup is fearsome without burdening the team with long-term commitments that might sour. And the bullpen should be fairly deep. If Affeldt can't handle closing duties, maybe you trade for a proven closer, but I think he'd be fine.
Posted by: mymrbig | October 14, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Another name I'd like to throw out in the bullpen mix would be Troy Percival. He's signed at 4MM for next year, and I could see him being moved. He was brought in to help fix that godawful bullpen, but the Tampa Bay bullpen is just fine this year (and next) without him. He wouldn't cost much in terms of prospects and would be another cheap addition to the pen.
Posted by: melonis rex | October 14, 2008 at 12:58 PM
Hah, totally forgot about acquiring Andruw Jones in my lineup. Juan Rivera doesn't need to be signed in that case.
The thing I like about my proposals is that the Mets would have a good amount of money coming off the books after 2009, $20-30 million between Delgado, Grudielanek, and Jones (minus Castillo). And there are some interesting post-2009 free agents that might be worth spending money on (Brian Roberts, Lackey, Ankiel, Bay, Crawford, Vlad, Holliday, Bedard, Harden, Myers).
Posted by: mymrbig | October 14, 2008 at 01:01 PM
melonis rex...the only team schneider can hit is the nationals...and I realize that defense is more highly valued than offense at catcher, but Schneider's defense proved to be mostly reputation. I watched about 95% of the Mets games this year, and he didn't look like a defensive wizard. Statistically he had a 33% caught stealing rate, 4 passed balls...although their were quite a few questionable wild pitches, and a 4.11 CERA...I would take Jose Molina's awful bat and stellar defense (44% caught stealing and 3.69 CERA), but Schneider's defense doesn't excuse having 6 extra base hits before the all star break. For some reason he can hit the nationals...but other than that, I barely think he's major league. By the way...if you notice Soto, Pierzinski, Navarro, Napoli, Martin and Mauer (163rd game is kind of post season...) were all on post season teams. The only teams that made it to October with bad offensive catcher's were the red Sox...and Schneider is no Varitek and Milwaukee and kendall's 42% CS and 3.83 CERA were vastly superior to Schneider's and he only had 4 passed balls as well...but in 40 more games...Shnyder had a 31%CS...i'll trade 2% for an extra .100 plus points in OPS
Incidentally...the Percival idea isn't awful...but again, i would rather see them bring in some high potential arms...at some point Percival will fall off a cliff...chances are he has...he was left off the playoff roster for a reason, even if it's just due to injuries, do you really want another guy that looks destined to break down late in the season?
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 01:22 PM
Almost forgot the Phillies...Coste can hit...but Ruiz is a hole too. They make up for it by having a bat at every other position and getting best in the leaguy production out of 2B...ohh and it helps that their main competition tends to faulter at the end of the season.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 01:27 PM
Rosenthal's article got me thinking so I did a little research. Is it just me or Minaya trying to put together the all-Latin team? I mean i know they have Wright and other player that they DEVELOPED, and have traded for Schneider and Church but this is overwhelming. And dont tell me they have a great scout team in latin america....every team does!
Of Latin decent on the 40 man roster:
Tony Armas
Luis Ayala
Ambiorix Burgos
Pedro Feliciano
Nelson Figueroa
Orlando Hernandez
Pedro Martinez
Carlos Muniz
Oliver Perez
Ricardo Rincon
Duaner Sanchez
Jason Vargas
Robinson Cancel
Ramon Castro
Johan Santana
Gustavo Molina
Luis Castillo
Carlos Delgado
Ramon Martinez
Argenis Reyes
Jose Reyes
Moises Alou
Carlos Beltran
Endy Chavez
Angel Pagan
Fernando Tatis
Thats 25 of 40 players from a Latin decent. And thats just the 40 man roster....amazing. If Ozzie was available, you know he be their next manager.
My guess is that if they had to choose from a white/black player and a latino, they would sign the latino.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 01:36 PM
I'm not hispanic...Chico Walker made the last out of pretty much every Mets game I went to see for almost 2 years straight...so I adopted his name...that being said, I'm a little puzzled to what claeknaddison's point is? Are you saying that if a world series winning manager that took his team, which was pegged to be no better than 3rd in their division, to the playoffs this year were available, than their would be something wrong with signing him?
The fact is the Mets have a huge hispanic fan base in NY, and it makes sense to have a some hispanic stars on the team, but that logic really only applies to stars...no one cares that Robinson Cancel and Tony Armas are latino's because they stink. We then come to the actual stars...Beltran, Delgado, Reyes and Santana...you could add Alou if he ever played and maybe I'll give you Ollie.
Reyes is the second most desirable shortstop in the major leagues...after Hanley Ramirez ( I didn't say second best, although you can make that argument)..would you prefer Craig Counsell?
Beltran is a top 5 center fielder...and was one of the most coveted free agent signings of the last 5 years...
Delgado is arguably a hall of famer and Santana is the best pitcher of his generation...
You could argue that he gave an awful contract to Castillo because he's hispanic...but he gave an equally awful contract to schoenweiss and he's white. He traded for Maine, signed Billy Wagner...they drafted Pelfrey...Stokes is white, Brandon Knight is white, Joe Smith is white...Daniel Murphy is white...so Nick Evans...as are John Niese, Mike Karp and Bobby Parnell...
The real issue isn't that the mets have so many hispanic players on the roster it's that they have so many horrible hispanic players on their roster...beat up Minaya all you want...but do it for good reason, the fact is that in baseball has been outsourced in a very real way. It's cheaper to sign mediocre latin american talent and develop it than it is to sign mediocre american talent and develop it. Most teams are built in a similar fashion.
And as to your guess that if they had to choose between a white/black player and a latino and everything was absolutely the same...age, talent, potential, money, etc...than it really doesn't matter who they choose does it? Sports, in this day and age are about money, players are not denied opportunities at the major league level becaue of race...now opportunities in the minors are a different subject. Unfortunately due to the lack of comensurate labor laws in latin american countries the players are cheap and abundant, so they have a better chance to make into the system of a major league club. That is an issue that needs to be addressed by the prevailing governments and major league baseball, but I certainly don't see it as a case of reverse discrimination.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 01:59 PM
Hey Clarknaddison - I think its you and your biased views you think the mets are the only team with mostly hispanic players wake up the league is primarly hispanic so please keep your racist connotations to yourself.
Posted by: UncleMuscles | October 14, 2008 at 02:02 PM
i think that what he is trying to say is that hispanic players seem as if they dont play as hard and they are more care free. they have changed the game, they have brought all the hands shakes and a different attitude towards the game wether if you thinks its a good or bad thing is up to you.
Posted by: derman1984 | October 14, 2008 at 02:18 PM
I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing, but since approximately 28-30% of major league players are Latino, the fact that the Mets have 63% of Latino players on their 40-man roster does speak volumes about the type of players Omar Minaya goes for.
I think it's not only a product of Minaya's ethnicity himself, but also the area. Just as it is believed that the Red Sox are predominantly a white ballclub (check the article on this site posted today), which makes sense the team is from Boston, this city, and particularly the Mets, have a large Hispanic fanbase. They have created a new identity since '05 with the ''Los Mets'' ad campaigns and whatnot.
Again, not to turn this into a racist conversation, because I don't think it should have a negative connotation, but you can't deny that Omar did create a new identity with this team with the usual numbers of Latino players on a given team being more than doubled on the Mets.
Posted by: MattyMets | October 14, 2008 at 02:28 PM
what is going to be the mets fans excuse if the phils go to and win the world series? you always have something to say about the phils making the playoff that mets faulter down the stretch. is it that hard to imagine that you dont have that good as team as you think.
Posted by: derman1984 | October 14, 2008 at 02:28 PM
i dont mean it to be a negative thing. i have been watching and playing baseball for 19 years and i have notice that trend. latinos are very talented players. majority of best players in the league are latino. they have talent, they also have this care free attitude about them.
Posted by: derman1984 | October 14, 2008 at 02:31 PM
I don't know about the other Mets fans on here, but I'd be the first one to say that the Phillies are a better team than the Mets at this point. Any Mets fans that try to claim otherwise are just in denial. The Phillies beat the Mets out and played well when it mattered two years in a row while the Mets folded like a cheap suit in both years.
In a way, I really didn't feel that the Phillies had any reason to talk trash last year when guys like Kaz Matsui and Ubaldo Jimenez slapped them out of the playoffs in four days, but if they win it all this year at least they'll have something credible to say about how good their team is.
OK, now back to the Mets..
Posted by: MattyMets | October 14, 2008 at 02:40 PM
Matty, thank you. Im not being racist, just pointing out the fact that they are by far and away mort latino focused than any other club and have fallen flat the past 2 years because of it. Its my opinion and you can take it however you want, but, they are waaayyy to carefree. Where is the passion? Maybe Minaya should fix whats broken and change his coarse of action.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 02:41 PM
"You could argue that he gave an awful contract to Castillo because he's hispanic...but he gave an equally awful contract to schoenweiss and he's white. He traded for Maine, signed Billy Wagner...they drafted Pelfrey...Stokes is white, Brandon Knight is white, Joe Smith is white...Daniel Murphy is white...so Nick Evans...as are John Niese, Mike Karp and Bobby Parnell..."
Arent the majority of these players drafted through the ameture draft? They are, and I would have to say, Minaya either 1-didnt draft them or 2-had no choice b/c latinos from oversseas are not available in the draft.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 02:47 PM
Im not a mets fan, but i think Minaya is one of if not the worst GM in baseball. I was shocked to see him extended during their colapse prior to the post season. Can anyone please tell me why they extended him and why in the heck do it when they did? It just seems like a poor decision by a poor franchise.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 02:52 PM
There is no way that they fell flat because they are latino focused...the white players deserve just as much blame as the latino players for the colapse. I love David Wright, but it's well documented that he has struggled in the clutch. Schoenweiss gave up the go ahead HR in the last game, Murphy made a couple of crucial errors, Pelfrey was awful in the last Friday game. Brian Schneider struggled...as did Ryan Church after he came back from the concussion...John Maine got injured, but he wasn't exactly tearing up the league before he was hurt. Marlon Anderson is not a major league player anymore. Damion Easley broke down again...I hate being put in the position of blaming one group over another...but clearly there is ample blame to go around...not to mention that Willie Randolph was black...as is Jerry Manuel. Minaya did give the Mets a new identity...now we expect this team to win...we've been disapointed...but I would take this over Jim Duquette trading away Kazmir for a bag of balls and a bobblehead...Art Howe...Benny Agbayani...jeez, are you people serious?
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 02:55 PM
Yeah I don't think the fact that the Mets are a predominantly Latino team led to their downfall (in fact, I think that has no merit), but anyone that is denying that the Mets pick out a whole lot of Latino players just needs to look at the numbers compared to the rest of baseball.
Posted by: MattyMets | October 14, 2008 at 03:02 PM
Chico,
You are proving my view. As a whole, the team has no chemistry. Its safe to assume they segregate after the games and hangout with their own ethnintisity. I feel bad for Willie Randolph, there is no manager that can keep this team close and play as a team. They are too diverse and lacadasical.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:07 PM
Just for fun
Pelfrey - drafted in the first round by Minaya
Niese - drafted by Minaya
Maine - traded for by Minaya
Wagner - signed by Minaya
Smith - drafted by Minaya
Wright - not signed by Minaya...but resigned to a great deal by Minaya
Murphy - drafted by Minaya
I won't get into Stokes and Knight and those guys because I'm relatively sure they were just random pick-ups...The mets have become a much more talented team under Minaya. They are way better than before he took over the team...it's not good enough, especially for the money they spend...but outside of Castillo and Pedro and I don't see any awful contracts being given out to hispanic players over white or black players of better ability.
Who is equal to Santana or Beltran or Delgado at the time they traded for him...who is equal or better than Reyes...who I think was signed by Steve Phillips?
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 03:11 PM
chico,
if he could draft latin players, he probably could...but he cant...there is not a draft for them. Se basically brought them all in as FA's.
Look, I know he signed/traded for white/black players and any GM would be banned he didnt. You have to add some white/black players, its just not possible/efficient to have all latino players. But if he could, he probably would.
All im saying is that he favors them. How can you disagree? The numbers prove it!
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:15 PM
Amazing isn't it. Baseball has turned its attention on developing and scouting players in other countries while our own inner cities get the short end of the stick. Then baseball wonders why inner city baseball isn't producing more players. Geez, R.B.I, big deal, inner cities need more programs to get kids to play baseball. Right now basketball and football are king. Its too bad baseball and the Mets dont focus more on American born talent....
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:17 PM
Would Mets fans prefer to have Steve Phillips or Omar Minaya?
Phillips has got be one of the worst baseball analysists of all time, so I can't even imagine what it must have been like when he was running your team.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 03:21 PM
A friend wrote: I can't see any way the the Red Sox are actively trying to prevent non-white players from playing for them. Racism in the past meant staying with your own kind and actively excluding others of a different race. The problem today, at least with MLB doesn't have anything to do with actively excluding non-white races, it has to do with managers and general managers who actively pursue those of their own kind (I'm talking about you Omar Minaya and Dusty Baker). Dusty, Omar and the Red Sox don't seem to exclude anyone based on race but they each do seem to prefer a certain race.
Of course you won't see anything serious written about Omar or Dusty, since they're essentially protected. You'll see tripe like Rosenthal's article though because the Red Sox are prominent and they've sinned in their past. Once a sinner, always a sinner, at least if it sells. They'll never be able to move on if people won't let them.
Now do that same test with Dusty Bakers teams of the past, or Omar Minaya's teams. If it's not an issue for them it shouldn't be an issue for the Sox either.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:22 PM
I don't think that Minaya "goes after" latino players any more than Epstein "goes after" white players.
Who did you want the Mets to go after that they didn't because of race? If you're issue is with Argenis Reyes and Robinson Cancel or Carlos Muniz I won't argue, because in my opinion they are all basically AAA players. As far as the every day players go, I don't know that there were better options than Reyes, Beltran, Delgado and Santana. They are all in the upper eschelon of players in the league. Perez was a throw in from the Pirates...and he happened to work out relatively well. Pedro is a hall of famer...giving him 4 years was an awful idea, but bringing him to NY wasn't. Catillo is just horrible, I wont't argue that...me point is that Minaya has consistently gone after the best available players...the available ones just happen to be hispanic. If they sign KROD or Fuentes did they go after a hispanic closer or the best available closer? If they sign Manny, did they sign a hall of famer or did they go after another hispanic guy? Every met fan seems intent on signing Orlando Hudson...is he off limits because his name is Orlando?
As far as chemistry goes...do you think chemistry is why Glavine gave up all those runs in the first inning of game 162 last year?
The team lacks role players because they've invested a ton of resources in their star players...it doesn't matter if they are white, black or hispanic, the team is just top heavy in terms of talent and it causes significant holes. It's not a race issue.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 03:26 PM
I guess we agree to disagree...
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:39 PM
Theo got rid of Manny b/c he was a cancer. Not because he was Latin. Minaya will sign Manny b/c hes latin, not because he thinks hes a great guy. Thats Minayas problem, he doesnt realize that chemistry matters...and thats why they will flop again for the next 4 years of his ridiculous extention.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:43 PM
"Would Mets fans prefer to have Steve Phillips or Omar Minaya?"
Im glad niether one of those guys are running the Cubs...both are/were/will be terrible.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 03:44 PM
You need to learn the difference between correlation and causation. Your numbers don't prove anything. They aren't even persuasive stastistically speaking.
Major league baseball isn't large enough to expect a normally distributed curve with respect to race...aberrations and outliers will exist. Again for fun:
Let's assume 30 teams with 25 players...that gives us a total of 750 major leaguers. Out of those 10% are black, 30% are hispanic and 60% are white.
The break down is
75 black
225 hispanic
450 White
and on any given team you would expect -
3 black
9 hispanic
18 white
in this case we have a 9 player swing which is certainly within the realm of possiblity across a smaple size of 750...
And beyond that, taking a quick look at the ESPN.com roster that the mets ended the season with 19 of the 39 players are either black or white.
Bostick
Heilman
Kunz
Schoenewes
Smith
Stokes
Wagner
Knight
Maine
Niese
Parnell
Pelfrey
Schneider
Easley
Murphy
Wright
Anderson
Church
Evans
19 of 39...also not conclusive evdence of anything, but it should definitely be taken into account before anyone starts screaming reverse discrimination.
The funny thing is, I'm not a huge fan of Minaya...but I don't think his team failed because he discriminates, I think he just put too many eggs in too few baskets...some of them happen to be hispanic...so what?
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 03:46 PM
out of curiosity...do you think that that the Phillies are pitching around Manny in the playoffs because he's hispanic?
Does it count if someone is hispanic but from the US like Alex Rodriguez...what if they went to a high school in NY like Manny...what if he led his team to the playoffs by batting .400 for the second half of the season like Manny? You know what...I agree, forget Manny, forget Beltran, Reyes, Delgado and Santana...
Bring in Dontrelle, jeff kent, barry bonds and Milton Bradley and adma dunn...that should do wonders for chemistry
By the way, you mentioned our inner cities...which do need help...that much is obvious...but they need education so that they can have a realistic shot at a job...not a pipe dream of playing baseball in the majors. At any given time their are about 800 major league players...those aren't enough jobs to help the inner city problems and also...in NYC...the inner city is mostly hispanic, do they count?
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 03:54 PM
I'm speechless as to what this discussion has degenerated into.
Posted by: sampsonite168 | October 14, 2008 at 03:55 PM
chris maybe you can do that on your video game 09 mlb the show - good luck.
Posted by: Z3R0 | October 14, 2008 at 03:56 PM
The only thing we have to go by is numbers and over %60 of the Mets roster is Latin. The other teams, under 30%. Its pretty clear Minaya FAVORS latin players.
Again, I said Latin decent, not latin born players.
Really most inner cities are Hispanic? Not any of the cities iv lived in. Supporting recreational sports in America is not taking away anyones chances of succeeding in education. Most people I know grew up playing at least 1 sport. None of them had a fantasy of playing for a major league team. But if a kid has the talent and doesnt know it due to the lack of funding for recreational sprots, then thats just sad and a waste of talent.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 04:01 PM
Yeah, I think at this point it's time to leave this conversation alone about the Mets roster and Minaya's roster trends. Some people will think there's a correlation, others will think it's a coincidence, and others will just automatically think it doesn't even matter. There's no sense in arguing about it at this point - it's only going to become heated.
Posted by: MattyMets | October 14, 2008 at 04:14 PM
Matty,
Yeah, im dont my head hurts. Lets just say it would be a huge coincidense.
Posted by: clarknaddison | October 14, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Wow.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | October 14, 2008 at 04:18 PM
BACK TO BASEBALL!!!
Now, for all those stupid Beltran trade rumors, specifically to the Yanks:
The ONLY way i would trade beltran would be the following
Beltran, Castillo, Shoenwies to NYY for Chamberlain, Nady, Cano, A. Jackson, Hughes, E. Ramirez
Make Chamberlain closer, ramirez in bullpen, Cano at second, nady in left, move church to center, play murphy in left, have hughes and neise fight for 5th spot, loser goes to minors for inevitable injury call up.
Believe me, im not holding my breath over this one, nor do i think they will actually trade beltran.
Posted by: MetsFan5_7 | October 14, 2008 at 04:24 PM
Let's just accept the fact that David Wright, Jose Reyes, and Carlos Beltran will be Mets next year. I don't know about Carlos Delgado, but it's fairly obvious that those three players will be at Citi Field next year.
Posted by: MattyMets | October 14, 2008 at 04:33 PM
MetsFan5 7
Good thing you aren't holding your breath cuz that ain't ever going to happen.
Landing Hughes is certainly possible. Landing Hughes + Joba = no chance in heck the deal gets done.
I'm skeptical of Joba but every Yankee fan I know thinks he is the next savior. He is, to the Yankees, what David Wright is to the Mets - and probably then some.
And while Beltran is a valuable he is weighed down by a huge contract. Both he and Maggs will be interesting this off-season to watch. Every team would love to have them but at what cost? I don't see teams lining up to pay $18m/year + boat load of prospects when they can sign a guy like Burrell for $15m and no prospects.
Posted by: bjsguess | October 14, 2008 at 04:40 PM
Back to fixing the mets for 09.
A big reason why the mets failed for two consecutive years was their pitching their starters didn't go deep into games and the bullpen was terrible. John Maine and Oliver Perez regressed in their development while Pelfrey turned into a good pitcher.
Starting pitching opening #1. Derek Lowe would be a great signing on a 2 or 3 year deal at 15-17 mil per year with options for the fourth based on performance )innings reached no injury's playoff performance). He would also help Pelfrey develop his sinker.
Starting pitching opening #2. Sign Freddy Garcia Carl Pavano for the last spot in the rotation if you cant sign them give Heilman a shot his value can't really go any lower than it already is. Give Armas Jr. a minor league deal for insurance or maybe the long man in the pen.
The Bullpen Sign a bunch of setup men Affeldt Lyon Cruz Beimel maybe even Farnsworth to try and fix the bullpen. Relievers are hit or miss from year to year so no long term deals.
Left field Sign Juan Rivera he has never been given a starting job and will produce if given the chance. Have Tatis and Pagan also compete for the job.
Minaya is no where near the worst GM in the league and is good at finding diamonds in the rough and generally good at making trades. That said he did leave the bad bullpen the same from 07-08 and wonders why it struggled.
Posted by: metsfan | October 14, 2008 at 04:46 PM
Oliver Perez is a good pitcher I just can't stand seeing him struggle against bad teams and 16 mil for 4-5 years is just too much for someone that cannot go 6 innings consistently.
Posted by: metsfan | October 14, 2008 at 04:53 PM
"Beltran, Castillo, Shoenwies to NYY for Chamberlain, Nady, Cano, A. Jackson, Hughes, E. Ramirez"
Obviously you realize that this deal would never happen, I doubt you'd be able to get three of those guys unless the three are Cano, Hughes and Ramirez. And even then I promise you the Mets would have to put in more than just Beltran. I honestly think Beltran just stays with the Mets. You're talking about an elite defensive center fielder with 40 HR power, solid contact ability, above average plate discipline and quality speed. Basically Carlos Beltran is the full package in terms of performance, he offers talent at bat, in the field and on the bases. We're talking definite top 5 CF in all of baseball, and very possibly top 3 (I'd say with Hamilton, Sizemore, Granderson and probably Vernon Wells, but there could be some big jumps in '09 from Upton, Kemp, Young, Ellsbury, Milledge, Jones and Gomez that could be interesting) That's a very, very valuable player.
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 04:59 PM
I certainly didn't mean to hijack the board, but I think it's wrong to call out Minaya for "favoring" hispanic players, if the team won it wouldn't matter and the team doesn't win because there are huge holes. BTW, I didn't say most inner cities are latin, I said New York's inner city is hispanic. I also didn't say it was coincidence, I just said it wasn't inherently racist or the cause of the Mets colapse.
Trading the Beltran to the Yankees would be silly, Cano wil more than likely never be the run producer that Beltran is and both Kennedy and Hughes are long shots to be of any use this season. I especially would stay away from Hughes...young guys with an injury history scare me. If the Mets do trade Beltran it should be to plug at least 2 holes holes...CF (if he's traded), a corner outfield spot, 2nd base, a closer etc. As I mentioned earlier the White Sox have a few interesting pieces...Swisher, Jenks, Floyd and Dye are all attractive. Packaging Beltran to get 3 of those 4 would make sense.
I could also see the Red Sox giving some value...I like ellsbury in particular, but they would need to put at least another above average major leaguer with him.
Delgado has a few landing spots, as mentioned here before...the Blue Jays... I also think the DBacks could be a fit...maybe even the Dodgers if they get bounced out. ALthough, I don't see Torre taking a guy that couldn't get along with Randolph.
I think Reyes would bring the most back...what would people think of sending him to the Padres for Peavey?
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 05:03 PM
"As I mentioned earlier the White Sox have a few interesting pieces...Swisher, Jenks, Floyd and Dye are all attractive. Packaging Beltran to get 3 of those 4 would make sense."
The White Sox would definitely be interested in Beltran, but honestly the price would likely turn them off, considering what's more important for them is to find some speed, defense and a leadoff hitter. Beltran could be that guy, but his value would be wasted by batting leadoff. Plus he would likely cost the White Sox something like Swisher, Jenks, and Brian Anderson. I'd rather see the White Sox go after a leadoff hitter and not make a bunch of holes in their lineup.
"I could also see the Red Sox giving some value...I like ellsbury in particular, but they would need to put at least another above average major leaguer with him."
I honestly disagree. The Red Sox aren't trying to add more payroll, not in this economy. At this point considering that Ellsbury will be cheap for another like 5 years and Beltran will cost $18.5M for the next three and then will be need to be resigned when he will be 34. The Red Sox simply are better off plugging Ellsbury into center for the next 5 years and enjoying the speed, defense and leadoff hitting.
"I think Reyes would bring the most back...what would people think of sending him to the Padres for Peavey?"
Reyes is close to getting really expensive, and that's exactly what the Padres are trying to avoid by moving Peavy. He's only cost $26M for the next three years, but after 2011 he's going to command a huge contract. The Padres would probably be better off moving Peavy for a Bedard/Haren-like package of 5-6 young players. As for moving Jose Reyes, unless they could do it for a package that returned them a top SS shortstop prospect, an MLB-ready elite pitching prospect, and another elite prospect. For example, Reyes to the Rangers for Elvis Andrus, Neftali Feliz and Taylor Teagarden. Or maybe they would do Yovani Gallardo, Alcides Escobar and Angel Salome. I think Reyes stays..
Posted by: scribbletone | October 14, 2008 at 05:29 PM
I don't think the Mets are sending anyone, anywhere for prospects. They aren't looking to rebuild, at worst they are looking to rebuild. I don't know what the Red Sox will or will not do, but remember that they are moving 20 million in Manny money off the books. If they lose to the Rays this year they may be interested in making some moves, I don't know that Beltran is the answer for them, but I wouldn't be surprised to see them spend money on a bat this off season. The Padres...I agree...will get a boat load of prospects for Peavey, but I'm sure they would at least kick the tires on Reyes...If the Mets do move Reyes they need major league talent, and I don't think he will be moved...but it's cool to think about a Johan/Peavey 1-2
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 05:46 PM
"- Take a gamble on an "Injury Risk" starter for the 5th role since you can probably sign them for cheaper. Freddy Garcia is my first choice. Carl Pavano is also someone I'd consider. This way we can go into the year not relying on people like Jonathon Niese, and can allow him more time to develop in the minors. "
Or you can just let Heilman have the 5th spot. He is just as likely to have success as Pavano or Garcia, is also cheap, and is younger and not injury prone. Give him a chance to rebuild his value, in a spot where he always wanted to be.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 14, 2008 at 05:50 PM
EPIC TRADE
Mets get:
Dan Uggla
Scott Olsen
PTBNL
Marlins Get:
Mets Bullpen. Like, literally, every picher in there, the mound, benches, fence, trashcans, everything. The only holdup would be who Mets fans blame next season when they choke...zing! Maybe Wes Helms is the PTBNL. He seems like a guy who's willing to fall on the sword.
Posted by: baleen | October 14, 2008 at 05:51 PM
"EPIC TRADE
Mets get:
Dan Uggla
Scott Olsen
PTBNL
Marlins Get:
Mets Bullpen..."
I would trade the entire mets bullpen for a Carlos Marmol bobblehead doll...come to think of it they can have the HR Apple too...
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 06:05 PM
Well first thing I would try and do would be trade for JJ Putz. A package of something like Carp, Evans, and maybe Kunz could get a deal like that done.
I'd then try and make the Castillo and a minor prospect for Eric Byrnes. I like I have heard other people say would also go after Jerremy Affeldt.
I'd move Schoenweis, Sanchez, and would trade Heilman and a prospect like maybe Dillon Gee or Nick Evans for Houston Street. I know that doesnt sound like a good deal for Oakland but I heard that Billy Beane likes Heilman and has tried to get him in the past.
Then I would sign Orlando Hudson or David Eckstein (preferably Hudson) to play second and I would sign Lowe to stregnthen the rotation. I also wouldnt rule out the possibility of trading Delgado. My team would look like this.
Lineup
1. Jose Reyes SS
2. Orlando Hudson 2b
3. David Wright 3b
4. Carlos Beltran CF
5. Carlos Delgado 1b
6. Eric Byrnes LF
7. Ryan Church RF
8. Brian Schneider C
9. Pitcher
Rotation
1. Johan Santana
2. Derek Lowe
3. Mike Pelfrey
4. John Maine
5. John Neise
Bullpen
Closer- JJ Putz
Jeremy Affeldt
Houston Street
Bobby Parnell
Joe Smith
Pedro Feliciano
Brian Stokes
I dont think thats an unrealistic team. I think putting a team like that on the field next season is realistic. I like Hudson and Lowe as the big FA signings for the Mets and Byrnes is a good clubhouse guy who if he can stay healthy will produce on the field.
Trading for Putz and Street and signing Affeldt totally revamps this bullpen. Stokes did a decent job this season and I think he deserves a shot to be a fixture here. Feliciano and Smith are good specialists so I dont see why they should be sent packing.
Posted by: metsfan99 | October 14, 2008 at 06:10 PM
"I don't see teams lining up to pay $18m/year + boat load of prospects when they can sign a guy like Burrell for $15m and no prospects"
When Andruw jones and Torii Hunter are making as much/more then Beltran, how is his contract not fair? How can you compare Burrell to Beltran? One plays LF, and provides nothing but power/obp. One plays CF, provides power/obp, baserunning, and defense. They are completely different. Beltran is among 2 or 3 other guys that are comparable to him. Burrell is among 15 or 20.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 14, 2008 at 06:29 PM
"That said he did leave the bad bullpen the same from 07-08 and wonders why it struggled."
Yeah, but you conveniently forgot it was also the same bullpen as 2006, when they were outstanding. You said it yourself, bullpen arms fluctuate from year to year.
Posted by: nrmax88 | October 14, 2008 at 06:31 PM
"Yeah, but you conveniently forgot it was also the same bullpen as 2006, when they were outstanding. You said it yourself, bullpen arms fluctuate from year to year."
It really wasn't the same bullpen...Darren Oliver and Chad Bradford got big time outs in 06. They also had a healthy Duaner for half the year, Roberto Hernandez for half the year and Mota on steroids...not the same thing.
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 06:59 PM
Hey 'MetsFan5 7'. You made a post at about 4:24...Just wanted to let you know that..you couldnt get 2 of those guys let alone 6 of them. Hey how about we throw Arod in there too!!! He could be DH!!! Yea how about next time you keep your dreams to yourself
Posted by: Mason | October 14, 2008 at 07:01 PM
For some reason I actually think you would find Yankee fans willing to put AROD in a trade for Heilman
Posted by: ChicoWalker | October 14, 2008 at 07:03 PM
Pageian, you've got to be shitting me. Are you saying Victorino is better than Beltran just by OPS? Beltran is better than him in almost every stat and is probably one of, if not the best defensive CF in baseball. He is a 5-tool player, and him and Johan did have heart in September and they tried their hardest but unfortunately came up short...I'd rather fail 2 years in a row then fail 124 out of 125 years.
Posted by: nymforlife | October 14, 2008 at 07:18 PM