MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Fantasy      RSS Usage

« MLBTR Chat Transcript | Main | Rosenthal On Boras' Scheme »

A's Interested In Nick Johnson, Jason Giambi

3:06pm: Susan Slusser of the San Francisco Chronicle has more.  She says the A's checked in on Johnson a month ago, and they're looking into multiple first base/DH types that fit the affordable/solid OBP mold.  Slusser believes Jason Giambi remains the A's top target, assuming he backs off his three-year demand.  She adds that the A's want to keep Daric Barton and get him back on track.

12:59pm: MLB.com's Bill Ladson talked to a baseball source who says the A's received Johnson's medical records but trade talks have not yet begun.  Ladson's source added that several other teams have Johnson's records as well.

9:33am: I missed this nugget in Ken Rosenthal's column last night, but fortunately DRays Bay found it:

The A's have requested and received the medical records of Nationals first baseman Nick Johnson, who underwent season-ending wrist surgery last June.

On paper, adding Matt Holliday, Rafael Furcal, and Johnson would transform Oakland's offense.  Of course, Furcal and Johnson are injury risks.  Johnson is set to earn $5.5MM in '09 after missing most of the '08 season.  The asking price for him can't be terribly high, yet he's capable of a .400 OBP and would benefit from the chance to DH occasionally.

I initially had a note here about Jim Bowden and Billy Beane matching up in '03 on the Jose Guillen-Aaron Harang trade, but I just read that Bowden was fired a few days before the deal.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e201053624c2eb970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A's Interested In Nick Johnson, Jason Giambi:

Comments

Johnson is a very nice player, but the guy is NEVER healthy.

Then again, he walks a lot and is always injured. Sounds like an Oakland ballplayer.

I looked it up... 6 trips to the DL. Twice transferred to the 60-day. Hell, the Nats will probably give him up for a pack of peanuts.

I usually have nothing to add ever, but just for the record (and I only mention it because I really didn't like Jim Bowden as Reds GM), Jim Bowden wasn't responsible for Aaron Harang.

Brad Kullman traded for Harang as interim GM between Bowden's firing and Dan O'Brien's hiring.

Absolute stud if they can keep him healthy at all. The guy will be one of the better producers in the league if he can ever keep it together. Perhaps would be a better risk than signing Giambi if they don't have to give up much.

"I usually have nothing to add ever, but just for the record (and I only mention it because I really didn't like Jim Bowden as Reds GM), Jim Bowden wasn't responsible for Aaron Harang.

Brad Kullman traded for Harang as interim GM between Bowden's firing and Dan O'Brien's hiring."

Can't you let him have ONE trade to his credit?! :)

Yeah, NJ is an on-base machine...when healthy. His 2006 season was very, very impressive, until he snapped his leg colliding with Austin Kearns. As a Nats fan, I'm split on him. I would love to see him play here, but he just can't seem to stay healthy, and freeing up $5.5MM would be nice..

A's do sound like a contender if they lock up Furcal and Johnson and if they stey healthy.

Bout time someone in the AL West tries to better themselves and doesn't make the division look like a joke.

Hey Mister Redlegs, I realized that shortly after posting and since corrected it.

Who is ready in the A's minor league system to make an impact? Holliday and Johnson would be a huge boost if guys like Patterson are ready. That pitching staff is going to be among the best in the league sooner or later, but will they be ready this year? Duscherer, Gallagher, Gonzalez, Eveland, and whose the fifth now that Smith is gone?

Even without Furcal that team could be competitive if the Angels fail to sign Teixeira or Sabathia. Why isn't Giambi being brought up more?

Nick's worth trade for if the A's only give up a halfway decent prospect.

In other news, I really hope they can sign Furcal and dump Crosby onto somebody. Tigers or Giants perhaps?

trading for*

The team would be more competitive, but possibly not enough to knock out the Angels. Angels still have a good 1-4 rotation without Sabathia.

Offense would be an issue, however, they were holding it's own before the Tex trade. Problem is that without the trade, the offense wasn't formidable.

have no clue what johnson's value is...100ab's in 2 seasons, makes 5.5 mill for 09...plus he wont behealthy to start 09. maybe A's are willing to take on the contract if they can dump crosby on another team. bowden likes hard throwers, speed, toolsy guys. maybe cassilla or eric patterson interests him? this would end any pursuit of giambi, who actually can hit and is healthy

if Oakland has interest in Johnson and for whatever reason that trade doesnt happen.. would they also be interested in Lyle Overbay?

im a Jays fan, and the Jays have been looking to trade away Overbay. the A's seem to have excess SP? (Duchscherer, Eveland, Gallagher, Braden, Gonzalez, Outman, Meyer, DiNardo). maybe they could trade away one of them for Overbay?


I wonder if Nick Johnson is traded that means the Nationals think they have the inside track on Tex?

If they traded Johnson and didn't get Tex, who would be their next 1B option?

willingham looks to be their 1b

I don't really think Overbay is Beane's type of guy. I'm thinking if it isn't NJ, it's going to be Giambi.

"The team would be more competitive, but possibly not enough to knock out the Angels. Angels still have a good 1-4 rotation without Sabathia."

I have to disagree. Love Lackey/Santana at the top, but I think Saunders comes back down to earth and they raelly outplayed their Pythagorean W/L last year (88 games I think is what they should have won). I think the West is very winnable.

That is of course unless the Angels go lock up CC.

I thought Bowden said Willingham wasn't going to play 1B.

Perhaps that would signal something on the Dunn/Teix front?

"If they traded Johnson and didn't get Tex, who would be their next 1B option?"

Assuming Willie Harris plays 2B, an OF of Milledge/Langerhans/Dukes, with Willingham at 1B.

Cubby fan23: Are you saying the Angels don't have a GOOD 1-4 rotation?

A's rotation still needs seasoning and this is purely speculating. Considering both Furcal and Johnson have injury histories and if they are SIGNED, you still need to factor this them into the equation. By far, they still do not have enough.

I'm wondering where this would leave Daric Barton. Perhaps he would be part of the deal? What would it reasonably take for Oakland to get Johnson? I guess Crosby wouldn't have much value to Washington since they've got Guzman at SS.

"I'm wondering where this would leave Daric Barton. Perhaps he would be part of the deal?"

Daric Barton still needs some seasoning at AAA IMO. I'd say he was called up way too early. No way the A's give up Barton for Johnson though.

I do think that Barton's upside is a healthy Johnson(not crazy amounts of power, but OBP machine).

melonis rex sorry but langerhans isn't even on the team any more and anderson hernandez or ronnie belliard would play a 2nd before harris all he is is a good utility guy the 13 homers where a fluke sorry willie also pena and kearns would fight for the outfield spot.

Some day I hope to live in a world where people stop bringing up the Angels record as it relates to Pyth and Francisco Rodriguez's high injury risk (even though he has pitched injury free for 7 years).

Two of the most irrelevant facts ever.

i just cant see giving much up for a guy who's barely played the last 2 yrs

A's take on the 5mill...salary dump

give up a depth player like robnett, cassilla, or patterson

The A's would certainly be better with Furcal than Crosby (assuming Furcal stays healthy). He is a nice SS. But let's not go crazy.

In 2008 he was injured for much of the year.

In 2007 he played for most of the year but put up a very poor 688 OPS with 25 SB's.

In 2006 he played an entire year and posted a solid 814 OPS.

Before that his OPS hovered between the low and high 700's with good speed. OBP has averaged 350 for his career.

Furcal is a nice player. Personally, I think the Dodgers overpaid for him (3/39 for basically 2 years of playing). The A's would be making a mistake to sign him for 4 years and $10m+/season.

And if the A's want Nick Johnson he should be free. No way he commands prospects + having the A's pick up his entire salary.

He makes Rich Harden look like Cal Ripken.

This would not be a good trade for oakland. Johnson is a very nice player, but is hurt wayyy to much.

"Cubby fan23: Are you saying the Angels don't have a GOOD 1-4 rotation?"

Not at all, it's a very solid one. Saunders is at the worst still a decent guy to throw every fifth day. I just don't think it's such a knockout rotation that it prevents anyone else from contending in the AL West.

"Some day I hope to live in a world where people stop bringing up the Angels record as it relates to Pyth and Francisco Rodriguez's high injury risk (even though he has pitched injury free for 7 years).

Two of the most irrelevant facts ever."

Perhaps if you failed math in high school they are. I'm not totally sure how judging a team's chances of future success based on statistics in the past is irrelevant. What do we go on then?

And it's off topic, but K-Rod's injury risk isn't based on the fact that he hasn't gotten (or has gotten) hurt in the past. It's based on a drop in velocity, a drop in other numbers like K/BB rates that signal a problem with the arm at worst, or a pitcher who is not going to be the stud he once was at best.

Casilla is NOT a depth player. He's only "depth" if the pen is good.

Johnson is a salary dump. AKA the Nats get a fringe prospect with little chance of making it or a cruddy AAAA player, but little/nothing else.

"melonis rex sorry but langerhans isn't even on the team any more and anderson hernandez or ronnie belliard would play a 2nd before harris all he is is a good utility guy the 13 homers where a fluke sorry willie also pena and kearns would fight for the outfield spot."

Langerhans was resigned.

Either Belliard or Harris could man 2B. Harris plays REALLY good defense (not sure how it is at 2B, although he's one of the best defensive LF in the game).

"He makes Rich Harden look like Cal Ripken." ---- Very funny


"Some day I hope to live in a world where people stop bringing up the Angels..."

I agree with this portion of your statement. It's bad enough having the cubby fans all over the comment boards, but why do the halo fans feel like they have to jump in and destroy every article that pertains to Oakland? I respect the heck out of the organization, but their fans blow harder than the Santa Ana winds.

Melonis: Langerhans may have been resigned but it was to a minor league deal. While he could make the team the Nats don't have the offense to carry him as a starter.

that must be one LONG report. As I'm sure has been said he has a lot of talent, but just can't stay healthy. Could be a steal.

Steveo: The Nats aren't going to contend in 2009 though. Use your role players, get rid of your dead weight, and trade those who have value to bolster the farm system.

A's should send em Crosby for Johnson after Furcal signs.

They make similar money, both come off the books after the '09 season, both have tons of unfulfilled potential, and both would represent a surplus given a Furcal signing and the Nats going hard after Tex with Dmitri Young and Josh Willingham already in tow.

Crosby could move to 2nd and significantly improve their infield defense. Maybe a change of scenery is just what the doctor ordered for getting his head right.

The Nats are better off keeping Johnson than trading him for Crosby.

Either dump him for salary relief or dont trade him at all.

Yeah I agree, Johnson is the type of player the Nationals need, high risk high reward for not too much $$ or too much of a commitment. Not sure what you gain by trading him if the return is minimal.

This is combining jclay's idea with a bit of other stuff.

The A's, if they get Furcal (or even if they don't- I'm convinced Pennington/Petit could match Crosby's contribution). If the A's got the Nats to take back Crosby's (even) salary , they could then also send the Nats Santiago Casilla (reliever). Crosby could then slot in at 2B.

Crosby + Casilla for Johnson.

Just an idea.

CubbyFan23 - what were you saying 7 years ago about K-Rod? Maybe you didn't have an opinion of him then. Let me tell you what the "experts" have claimed ever since he was in the minors.

1. K-Rod's mass effort motion makes him susceptible to tiring and leading to a fatgiue based injury.
2. K-Rod's unorthodox motion makes him susceptible to injuring himself.
3. K-Rod's slight build will lead to injuries and fatigue.

You can argue all you want about how effective K-Rod is. My point was related to references regarding his durability.

As for pyth I get the math. I'm quite good at math. My only comment is that the method doesn't accurate reflect projected win/loss for each teams style of play. The system assumes that winning close games is a function of luck rather than a function of a solid bullpen.

If pyth was really the way to determine win/loss then the Jays would have been the 2nd best team in the league (behind the Red Sox). Incidentally, the Jays were the 3rd best team in baseball according to pyth.

As for it's predictive value in the next year take a look at 2007 results.

Cubs were 88-74 (pyth) in 2007. They add a subpar RF and go on to win 97 games. The Red Sox were 103-59 (pyth) in 2007 and they go on to win (with virtually the same team) 95 games in 2008. One more example, the Rays pyth was 66-96 in 2007. Their record in 2008 was 97-65. Their big off-season acquisition - Matt Garza.

I don't care what the stat is. If you only look at one stat you will miss the bigger pitcher. Pyth has gotten it really wrong for the Angels the past 3 years. This doomsday talk is silly. With or without Furcal/Johnson the Angels walk away with the AL West.

Actually Bowden and Beane had that Guillen/Harang trade in the works prior to Bowden's ouster so I think it is safe to assume that Bowden had at least done some of the early groundwork for that trade.

Nick Johnson is perpetually injured and you can never count on him. He's a major risk, but if he comes cheap enough I suppose he's worth the risk.

If they are thinking of Giambi, I assume its as a DH because at this point of his career he isn't exactly Mr. Nimble at 1B; and if they are keeping Barton I'd think its to keep him at 1st.

With that assumption, I really wonder why they would want Giambi; afterall at this point of their careers Jack Cust does what Giambi does except for a heck of a lot less money.

Sure Cust might strike out a lot more, but OBP wise and HR wise, the two are pretty close. Both are also Left Handed.

Considering Cust put up some solid numbers last season without any protection in the lineup, I would think the A's would give him a chance with Holliday protecting him before they go and spend money on the tiny upgrade of Giambi.

Simply put, for the monetary savings of Cust v.s Giambi, I'd think the A's could improve the team in another spot where the upgrade would be more obvious.

KangarooBoxer26- Agreed. And, Beane won't/shouldn't move Cust. I'd much rather take Cust than Giambi at this stage of their careers. Giambi shouldn't be allowed to put on a glove. Ever.

First off, Bobby Crosby is NOT an everyday 2B. If Crosby moved from SS it would probably be to 3B or most likely 1B. With Crosby's career numbers, there is no way he is an everyday 3B or 1B. So the talk of moving Crosby to 2B is a waste of time. If he is not a regular everyday SS, he is most likely to be an Utility Infielder.

My guess is that even if the A's sign Furcal, they will keep Crosby as an insurance policy for Chavez, Ellis, Furcal, and whoever is at 1B which will probably be Giambi.

Nick Johnson is no more than a smoke screen/plan b for the A's signing Giambi. The A's don't want to let on how much they would like to bring back Giambi, so they allow the Nick Johnson medical records request to become public.


2009 A's Starting Lineup

SS Furcal
2B Ellis
DH Cust
LF Holliday
1B Giambi
3B Chavez
C Suzuki
CF Sweeney
RF Buck

jolstad- I'll repeat it again. Giambi cannot play defense. He HAS to DH. Giambi playing 1B is the A's giving back runs to the opposing team. With the A's young pitching staff, defense is HUGE for any kind of success.

Melonis: Giambi played 1B ALL SEASON last season for the Yanks. 1B defense is nearly worthless anyway, the best defender has like 3 DWS every year. Plus we dont need defense, WE NEED HITTING. We tried the d-heavy thing and it failed, now its mashers or bust!

Giambi has a career 1000+ OPS at the Collesium, you know who else has that? Like Manny and NO ONE else. Giambi needs to be here in 09.

Post a comment

This weblog only allows comments from registered users. To comment, please Sign In.


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


MLBTR Features



Recent Posts



Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Fantasy     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.