![]() |
|
|
| |
« Cubs Re-Sign Dempster | Main | Towers: Peavy To Braves Could Still Happen »
The Washington Post's Dave Sheinin tells us Nationals team president Stan Kasten is tempering expectations that the Nats will make an offer to free agent first baseman Mark Teixeira.
Sheinin quotes Kasten saying, "I don't want people to have unrealistic expectations" and "You're way ahead of us here." Then he offers some analysis:
My own take: The Nationals are still formulating the structure of the offer they plan to make to Teixeira. However, they also know they cannot compete with the likes of the Yankees, Red Sox and/or Angels when it comes to dollar figures. So they would like to get a better sense of Teixeira's true market before they make their pitch.
It's possible the Nationals will never get around to offering Teixeira a contract. The Yankees could start the bidding sky high, like they did with CC Sabathia.
Coley Ward writes for Umpbump.com and can be reached here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010535fa0f90970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kasten: No Offer Yet For Teixeira:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
As a Nats fan, i can only hope that they do get Tex.
I hate the yankees for making sky offer to CC and i hope he is smart enough to refuse thier offer.
Posted by: bronx | November 18, 2008 at 03:57 PM
I'm not a Yankee fan but I have no problem with how they use their resources. They can use them however they see fit, and I'd rather they spend money than make their owners rich(er). Anyone who dislikes the Yankees because the Yankees have some sort of unfair advantage is either jealous, immature, jealous, a direct competitor, jealous or just flat out jealous. You see where I'm going with this?
Posted by: pageian | November 18, 2008 at 04:02 PM
pagian,
I don't seem to understand. Are you calling people who envy the Yanks money jealous?
Posted by: GaryKeith&Ron | November 18, 2008 at 04:03 PM
"so let the yankees offer tex 7yrs 160 mill...so thats
CC 6yrs $140 mill
Burnett 5yrs $80 mill
which comes too $380 mill for 3 players nice going yankees spend that money"
Anyone else hate when people quote numbers like that? With those years/salary on average it'd be an extra $62 mil. Lumping the entire amount of the salaries together to make some kind of point makes it seem much more inflated than it really is. The Yankees would not be doling out $380 million, only that $62 million.
Posted by: CitizenSnips | November 18, 2008 at 04:06 PM
the yankees offeering the kind of money they've been offering this off-season makes me sick. The Yankess ownership needs to know you can't buy your way to the playoffs. the yankees see to be putting a price on talent, which is something that cannot be measured by price. Thier deal for CC is rediculous; CC's a great pitcher but he doesn't do well under pressure.
As a Nats fan, i can only hope and pray that they make and offer to Tex and that they dont wait to long to do so. They shouldn't be afraid to spend big $$$ on this guy. He's a great player who they can build their team around. I really think a 3-4-5 core of Guzman, Teixiera, Dukes/ milledge (depending on whether they trade him or not) is pretty powerful
Posted by: phoenix88 | November 18, 2008 at 04:09 PM
Pageian you don't think 3 or 4 teams having a shot at the big name free agents is an unfair advantage? This is coming from a Red Sox fan.
Obviously that money doesn't always translate into World Series wins but there is indeed some serious competitive balance in the MLB in my opinion.
Posted by: fitz | November 18, 2008 at 04:09 PM
Everyone is sure to be jealous of the Yankees when they become solely responsible for MLB instituting a salary cap.
Posted by: chrisdragon | November 18, 2008 at 04:10 PM
"Anyone else hate when people quote numbers like that? With those years/salary on average it'd be an extra $62 mil. Lumping the entire amount of the salaries together to make some kind of point makes it seem much more inflated than it really is. The Yankees would not be doling out $380 million, only that $62 million."
Just came in here to say that. All it illustrates is that the sizeable deals are long. They did the same with the Cubs offseason a few years ago and it drove me insane.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 18, 2008 at 04:10 PM
And to say you cannot buy yourself championships and into the playoffs IMO is incorrect. It's all about spending the money correctly.
If you buy enough good players, you WILL have a great shot at the World Series.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 18, 2008 at 04:11 PM
"Just came in here to say that. All it illustrates is that the sizeable deals are long. They did the same with the Cubs offseason a few years ago and it drove me insane. "
I'm guessing everyone thought they were handing Soriano a $136 million check or something.
Posted by: CitizenSnips | November 18, 2008 at 04:16 PM
Cubbyfan. say that again when your team actually wins a playoff game and realizes their mistake in signing soriano for 8 years
Posted by: phoenix88 | November 18, 2008 at 04:20 PM
LOLZLAJL OMG U GOT ME!
*rolls eyes*
What on earth does my team winning a playoff game have to do with me knowing what I'm talking about? Please let the grownups talk. You either do not understand how contracts work, or do not understand how numbers work. Either way, it's a worrisome situation.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 18, 2008 at 04:22 PM
Yankees need to get Mark Teixeira. Are lineup will be nothing with out him.
Posted by: yanks12025 | November 18, 2008 at 04:30 PM
The only thing that has kept the Yankees from buying championships every year is sheer ineptitude. If they truly do start succeeding in winning by simply out-bidding everyone, how many years would it take for fan interest to erode across the league. MLB knows this and I think Hank and Hal could truly be the eventual cause of a salary cap if this scenario came to pass.
The alternative to a salary cap could be just putting the trophy up for auction every year in the spring. High bidder (Yankees) wins and we can dispense with players and their salaries and this silly 162 game schedule.
Or maybe long term contracts to every veteran player in the market, despite, their talent, isn't the panacea that the Yanks think it is and they'll wind up with a very old, very expensive, very injured and and poorly performing team in a few years. Hasn't that been the Yankees magic formula all along?
Posted by: MickS | November 18, 2008 at 04:31 PM
Sorry but wouldn't it be easier to let the o's, yanks, sox and angels battle over tex and just sign adam dunn(by the way i think he's going to the o's) anyway GO NATS!
Posted by: Dj 26 | November 18, 2008 at 04:32 PM
So if you guys want to install a saslary cap then let's take it one step further and let's change the draft system. Let's either allow #1 picks to be traded or switch to a weighted lottery system. Or let's take even further and allow ameatures to be signed like FA with "bonus" money? Because as it is the Yanks, or any winning team will never have an opportunity to draft the top 10 players in the country like the Rays, Brewers or Pirates.
Contrary to popular belief the Yanks have had a #1 pick every year in the last 15 drafts except for 2002. However, we haven't had a top 10 pick since the year we drafted Jeter @ #6 overall. The way the system works if you are among the top teams in the draft then you'll never draft anywhere neer the top 10 players in the following years draft. The Rays have been able to cherry pick the best players ever year not because their a superior farm system but because their draft slot is always 1 thru 5 and that's where Longoria, Upton, Price, Hamilton, Baldelli have all come from.
So if you want a salary cap then you must also revamp the draft set up and the way teams handle/trade their picks? Fair?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 04:34 PM
Theirs no way the Nats are getting Tex...They don't have that kind of money to go out and spend but it never hurts to make a bid...I see the Orioles making a bid for Tex too he's expressed interest in playing for his hometowen team and they could use him.
Posted by: JT89 | November 18, 2008 at 04:36 PM
The playoffs is a total crapshoot, or very close to it. No team can truly "buy" championships because teams like the Cardinals/Rockies/etc. of past years are always going to have a good enough chance of winning. The odds are never really in your favor to win a championship, just better than others.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 18, 2008 at 04:38 PM
Why spend so much on Tex if they just got a quality 1st baseman in Nick Swisher?
Posted by: Pebbles | November 18, 2008 at 04:39 PM
"And to say you cannot buy yourself championships and into the playoffs IMO is incorrect. It's all about spending the money correctly."
This is true.
Money CAN buy championships.
Would the Sox have two titles in 5 years if they could only spend 75 million? Probably not.
If you spend it incorrectly, frivolously, then yeah it won't me of much help.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 18, 2008 at 04:40 PM
And yes I realize I just said that it can and can't buy championships. :) What I mean is that money can definately boost your chances of winning by a LARGE margin if spent correctly. However, no team is going to ever be able to go out and win 10 straight championships just by outspending everyone else, no matter how good the talent is.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 18, 2008 at 04:42 PM
I never said you don't know what you're talking about. I understand how number work, and how contracts work thank you very much. Check you condescending attitude at the door next time.
I disagree with what you said initially, considering your team bought soriano for 8 years/ $136 million, which is way more than he;s worth.
Oh and by the way, way to contradict yourself by saying "LOLZLAJL OMG U GOT ME!" and "Please let the grownups talk" in the same post. Grow some maturity and so decency not to flame people for disagreeing with you. Watching you type that last post was like watching Michael J.Fox play Jenga.
Posted by: phoenix88 | November 18, 2008 at 04:45 PM
"the yankees offeering the kind of money they've been offering this off-season makes me sick. The Yankess ownership needs to know you can't buy your way to the playoffs. the yankees see to be putting a price on talent, which is something that cannot be measured by price. Thier deal for CC is rediculous; CC's a great pitcher but he doesn't do well under pressure."
That's because of CCs apparent interest in playing in the West Coast. To try to entice him to come to the Yankees (lets face it, they REALLY NEED an ace pitcher like Sabathia), they had to make it very enticing to him.
Besides, without CC on their rotation, nor another top-tier pitcher acquisition, the Yanks are going nowhere but mediocrity. The Yanks know it, their fans know it.
Posted by: Ink&Paper | November 18, 2008 at 04:45 PM
While the Yankees haven't been able to "buy" a championship, they have,in fact, bought their way into the playoffs pretty much every year. Hence, their sense of entitlement and why they are so pi$$ed off that their $200m. team fell flat on its face this year. I think sooner or later a salary cap is probably inevitable. Then maybe we'd find out what kind of G.M. Cashman really is.
Posted by: MickS | November 18, 2008 at 04:55 PM
"Oh and by the way, way to contradict yourself by saying "LOLZLAJL OMG U GOT ME!" and "Please let the grownups talk" in the same post."
.....
*sigh*
The caps'd type was complete sarcasm. Obviously it flew about twenty feet over your head.
Somehow, I am not surprised.
Getting back to baseball talk, Sabathia is a must for this rotation. Instantly pushes them ahead in a crowded AL East, gives them a go to guy in a five game series who can carry the load. Heard someone mention it the other day, and Milwaukee getting bounced from the playoffs was great for whoever CC signs with, but I still can't help but wonder what damage was done to his arm in some of these starts.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | November 18, 2008 at 04:56 PM
How does it feel to know that Sabathia really doesn't want to play for the Yankees and if he comes there it is only about the money?
Posted by: MickS | November 18, 2008 at 05:06 PM
Someone said "the Yanks fell flat on their face".
Let me say that I'm a "Win the World Series or the season is a bust" kind of fan. So even if we made the playoffs last year I would be dissapointed (sorry that's how we are). But you people do realize that with 2 rookie starting pitchers, 1 injured ace, a new manager, an injured DH and starting catcher who combined for 200 rbis's last year, we still won 89 games and had the 4th best record in the AL last year right? Let's not compare our demise to that of the CLeveland Indians who were 1 game away from the World Series and then barely made it to .500 this year.
And as for this thought that the Yanks "try to buy a world series", we ARE trying to develop young players (Hughes, Kennedy, Memlky, Gardner, Joba) but are we suppose to sit around and wait until one of them develops into an 18 game winner and not sign a FA? Are the Red Sucks, Angels, White Sox, Blue Jays, O's, etc going to refrain from signing FA's too? It kills me how silly some of you Yankee haters are.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 05:10 PM
MickS:
I assume you have a job. Do you go to work everyday because you absolutely love what you do and your boss rubs your feet and feeds you ice cream and cake everyday or do you do it because they pay you a check? And if another company offered you a pay raise of 50% are you going to say no because you just couldn't imagine leaving them? Get real. If CC doesn't want to play in NY so be it. I haven't heard those words come out of his mouth yet.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 05:12 PM
Hey, Yank-off since 78. I do a lot of recruiting and believe it or not MLB players are employees like in every other industry. When a guy takes a job only, I say only, for the money, it often doesn't end well.
Posted by: MickS | November 18, 2008 at 05:18 PM
Don't you find it just a little bit embarrassing that C.C. didn't jump on that record offer?
Posted by: MickS | November 18, 2008 at 05:19 PM
I'm self-employed by the way. People work for me so I know of which I speak.
Posted by: MickS | November 18, 2008 at 05:20 PM
umm besides the bs offer from milwaukee nobody else has offered sabathia any money. That would be bad business to jump on the first thing that came your way. If you're self employed you should probably know that no?
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 18, 2008 at 05:33 PM
I'm sorry to make this an English class, but can people PLEASE learn how to write at least REASONABLY well? Writing are instead of our? I hate, but tolerate, the common mistake of your vs. you're, but are instead of OUR? Come on guys. If you can read this site, you should know that much about the language for God's sake.
Posted by: CTScott | November 18, 2008 at 05:38 PM
I'm self-employed myself. Do you think people work for you because of your cheerful disposition or because you cut them a check every two weeks? And are you so conceited to think that they wouldn't go to work for your competitor if he offered them more money or other incentives?
And no I'm not upset or insulted that CC hasn't responded yet, no do I think Cash/Yanks are. he's making a major decision that will change the lives of himself and his family. You people are acting as if the Yankees are buring the guys soul. They're offering him market value to come and do a job. There's not going to be, or their shouldn't be, animosity if he decideds to go elsewhere. At the end of the day this is sports we're talking about. Not life and death. That's why I can't wrap my head around why there's so much anymosity towards how the Yanks run their business. If Billy Beane's wants to/needs to trade his star players because the city of Oakland doesn't want to buy them a new stadium and they can't generate enough revenue to attract/retain the players they want then they conduct their business the way they have to. The Yanks have a completely different business model and a certain aesthetic that's unique in it's own right. Some people love the idea of playing in NY or LA or Chicago. Some might prefer to cozr confines of Milwaukee or Pittsburgh, so what? We didn't write the rules and we aren't breaking any. Any we certainly aren't the once's who set the precedent by signing Zito to 7/125 or Arod to 10/250. If I'm correct those were those small market teams that completely blew their competitors (none of which were the Yanks) completely out the water.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 05:39 PM
And I'm also in the entertainment biz and understand that NY has a certain cache that other cities just can't offer. I have clients willing to take LESS money to peform in NY, LA or Miami rather than some small mid-west town. It's just the way life is dude.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 05:41 PM
we didnt sign mike hampton to 8/121 either
Posted by: Casanova Wong | November 18, 2008 at 05:58 PM
to YanksFanSince78 ... if we instituted a salary cap the drafting problems for the Yankees would go away. You would have consistent opportunities to draft at the top of the board.
Can anyone even imagine a world where the Yankees are limited to spending a similar amount as other teams?
...
Anyway, good luck Nats with sinking $100M+ into a 1B. Absolute worst thing you can do. How about saving your pennies and putting them toward player development. Tex might add a handful of wins but you will still remain a last place team - just $20m poorer (every year for the next 7 years).
Posted by: bjsguess | November 18, 2008 at 06:20 PM
BTW - whether you want to say signing Tex, CC, and Burnett is $380m or $62m annually it doesn't matter much. The point is, that's an ungodly amount of cash. Factor in that you are ADDING that an already ungodly amount of team salary and you can see why people hate the Yanks.
Using opening day figures for 2008 - those 3 players would cost more than the ENTIRE TEAMS of the Marlins, Rays, A's, Pirates, Nationals, Royals, and Twins.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 18, 2008 at 06:24 PM
bjsguess:
The Yanks have had a #1 draft pick every year in the last 15 years except for 2002. What we haven't had is a pick in the top 10 and is that is because the team with the worst record picks 1st and so on and so on. The team with the worst record will always pick first and the team with the best record will always pick last. What is so hard to understand?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 06:32 PM
And BTW. If the Yanks were to sign CC, Burnett and Texiera then we would NOT have a budget any bigger than last years salary.
Abreu, Mussina, Pettite, Giambi, Irod, Sexos, Ponson, Pavano = $80 mil +
CC, Burnett and Tex probably = $65 mil.
Everybody happy? The Yanks are price cutting. Cheers..
And guess what? We take another $25 mil off the books when we let Damon and Matsui walk as well.
Hmmmmm, Holliday, Victor Martinez or Adam LaRoche might be good additions. What do my fellow Yank fans think?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 06:39 PM
bjsguess:
If you add up all the rings won by the Marlins, Rays, A's, Pirates, Nationals, Royals, and Twins in the last 15 years would it add up to 4 (sorry but all this anti-yank hate is getting old).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 06:43 PM
It doesn't make much of a difference that the Yanks don't usually have high picks. They usually get top 10-15 talent on guys whose contract demands are too high for the likes of the Royals, Nats, Pirates, etc.
Posted by: thehoagster07 | November 18, 2008 at 06:53 PM
"Hmmmmm, Holliday, Victor Martinez or Adam LaRoche might be good additions. What do my fellow Yank fans think?"
Are you really 30 years old? Please say no...
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 18, 2008 at 06:53 PM
" whether you want to say signing Tex, CC, and Burnett is $380m or $62m annually it doesn't matter much. The point is, that's an ungodly amount of cash"
440 million dollars spent in total last off season. They were supposed to no longer be the Yankees of old, but I guess that changed.
What's another 380+ this year? They're the Yankees and you and I are obviously just jealous. :(
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 18, 2008 at 06:58 PM
The Yankees spent 440 million last year? When?
Posted by: CitizenSnips | November 18, 2008 at 07:09 PM
Why do you care? It's not your money? We spent what we were willing to spend to retain Mo, Posada and Pettie last year.
This year we lose 80 mil off the books and will use about 80% of that to possible sign CC, Burnett and Tex.
And next year when we let Damon and Matsui walk we'll have another $25 mil to spend and maybe we'll use that for a star LF, RF, 1B or C. Does that bother you. And you people will complain "evil empire..blah blah blah...Yanks are bad for baseball...blah blah blah...the Yanks are the cause of juvenille diabetes and the green house effect blah blah freakin' blah. Meanwhile we would've improved our team while maintaining the same payroll we had in 2008 and maybe even less. And you people better HOPE Cash doesn't get things right with the farm team. Hate yourselves not the Yanks. You people need a hug.
Go bark at the Red Sox for signing JD Drew for 70 mil and Man-NY for 160 mil, or the Rangers for Arod for 250 mil or the Giants for Zito at 120 mil.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 07:11 PM
"Why do you care? It's not your money? We spent what we were willing to spend to retain Mo, Posada and Pettie last year."
Hey, just like you say, everyone who hates the yankees needs a hug, obviously we're jealous and better HOPE Cash doesn't get things right with the farm system.
Are you sure its not Yanksfansince98?
You CANNOT be 30 years old.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 18, 2008 at 07:19 PM
They sayd $40 mil but they fail to mention that those contract are spread over many years for many players (Posada, Rivera, Arod). What they fail to mention is how the Tigers signed Cabrera to 7 yrs/$140 mil, the Cubs signed Zambrabo for 5 yrs/92 mil and the Mets signed Santana for 6 yrs/135 mil.
But yet we're the Evil EMpire and the reason gas was so high this year. Go figure.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 07:19 PM
"Does that bother you"
Haha nope. For any rational fan, baseball and sports in general are a "what have you done for me lately?" business. So regardless of how many World Series or play off appearances the Yanks have, the fact they haven't won years and are growing increasingly desperate to do so, leaves me content.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 18, 2008 at 07:22 PM
Yes, you guys need a great big old hug. For some reason you hate the Yanks for wanting to improve the team and for be willing to spend THEIR own money. is this still America? And I'm not sure what you find so childish about my stance. Not that I really care though. Go Yanks.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 07:31 PM
And what team are you a fan of again?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 07:31 PM
Ehh like I just said, they're not winning so they're only bringing a smile to my face.
I find the arrogance of 90% of the NYY fans I've encountered amusing and you're no exception...so I guess that's what I find so childish about your stance.
You can't honestly wonder why people hate the Yankees (and their fans) right? I mean isn't it obvious?
Besides of course the fact that we need a hug, and were haterzzzz, and we're jealous and all that.
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 18, 2008 at 07:34 PM
It isn't the amount of money being spent, it's the sense of entitlement that goes right along with it.
imo...
Posted by: Kenan and Kel | November 18, 2008 at 07:35 PM
cubbysfan23
better start looking at the numbers.
the cubs have joined the giants and mariners as baseball's worst load of contracts.
Posted by: crash | November 18, 2008 at 10:23 PM
Sense of entitlement? Lucy 'splain yourself!!
Look not all Yank fans realistically expect the Yanks to sign every single FA. But we have needs and we have money so we are always going to be in the running. People are getting their panties in a bunch because we want to sign CC, Tex and Burnett or Lowe (ugh). So what? We have $80 mil coming off the books and will probably come in UNDER last years budget. We need 2 starting pitchers. Are we suppose to fall back and hope that a 20 game winner emerges from one of our rookies? Get real. We can sign 2 pitchers and STILL let Hughes and Joba start. We can also let Kennedy work himself out. Why does our desire to win bother you? And why doesn't anyone hate on the Red Sox? They spend a lot of money too. They've had more of their rooks make an impact but they dropped an obscene amount of money of Ramirez, Matsuzaka and Drew.
Next time you go shopping for a new car and you see a guy who looks incredibly wealthy and he's looking at buying a really expensive car and your shopping on a budget ask yourself "Is it wrong for me to get mad because he can afford more that what I can". I would hope your answer would be "yes" that is stupid. And so are the endless discussions about how much the Yanks spend.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 10:25 PM
Oh yeah Red Sucks Dynasty. Your a 1st class putz but congrats on your MVP 2nd baseman. I'm pretty happy with Cano but I DO admire Pedroai's game and how he has developed. How 4 more years until free agency right?
.....joking.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 18, 2008 at 10:29 PM
Did the yankees make the playoffs last year? Can't remember..
Posted by: cook | November 19, 2008 at 12:42 AM
Bottom line is: People that hate the Yankees for their market, resources and desire to win are seriously out of touch with reality.
Posted by: ArodMVP217 | November 19, 2008 at 01:05 AM