![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rule 5 Draft Info | Main | Twins To Avoid Type A Free Agents? »
The latest on the Mets.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536152d38970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mets Rumors: K-Rod, Fuentes, Vazquez, Garland:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
this is amazing to me how idiotic Minaya is. How can you not go out and get a Beimel to replace a Feliciano or Schowenweis??? You don't think Cruz is better than Duaner Sanchez or Joe Smith??
If the Mets get no one but a closer, If i were a mets fan, I'd want Minaya fired.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 24, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Im sure their Type A status may play a role, but I am sure mets are not just goingto add a closer and think their pen is fix....
Posted by: tvators | November 24, 2008 at 11:19 AM
So the Mets' plan is to sign a big time closer and leave the rest of the bullpen the way it was? Really?
Didn't they have that basic set up last season with Billy Wagner, and didn't it go pretty poorly?
Clearly, the issue with New York's bullpen was (outside of a good closer) a complete lack of depth. They simply didn't have many relievers who were pitching well.
It seems pretty evident now that the Mets will sign one of Fuentes, K-Rod and/or Wood, but I really think that adding another guy like Cruz or Beimel at 2/8 or 3/12 would be a really good idea to help bridge the gap to the 9th inning. Depending on guys like Ayaya, Kunz, Smith, Heilman, Schoe and Feliciano before a big time closer makes no sense, they'd blow a bunch of leads before Fuentes could even warm up.
If that is Omar's plan, then he better do a damn good job of bulking up the rotation and lineup.
Vazquez and Getz for Castillo, Fernando Martinez, and a low level prospect?
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 12:00 PM
The Mets have several LOOGY types. One of Feliciano/Show is staying. They don't need Beimel.
What do the Mets have that the Rays would want for Edwin Jackson? Ryan Church doesn't really make that much sense (Rays have Gabe Gross, and Church isn't a major improvement).
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 01:24 PM
Oh. Jon Garland sucks.
The Mets need a bullpen, not a closer.
Brewers should steer clear of K-Rod.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 01:28 PM
"Vazquez and Getz for Castillo, Fernando Martinez, and a low level prospect?"
The Mets have money. In other words, they shouldn't trade top prospects for salary relief. Fernando Martinez alone can net more than Vazquez and Getz, don't drop his value in exchange for salary relief.
Garland is an Aaron Heilman who got the chance to come into his own in the rotation. Garland had years that mirror Heilman's rookie season.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 02:05 PM
Hey Mets Fans:
Any trade that you all can think of that send the White Sox Castillo is not going to happen. The Sox, if you haven't noticed are getting younger and cheaper. Castillo's contract and age does not fit with the core of the White Sox movement. Vazquez for prospects sounds good. Trading Vazquez may just be a salary dump on the White Sox part, kinda like the Nick Swisher trade.
Posted by: Tough | November 24, 2008 at 02:11 PM
So one hack writer writes the Mets won't go after middle relief and everybody freaks out? philsWS.... was Pat Gillick an idiot for not overhauling the Phillies crap bullpen? No. He traded for Lidge, traded for Romero, who couldn't hack it at the time, and stuck in failed starters like Durbin. The Mets could feasibly have the same bullpen next year and outperform the Phils pen. It isn't like building a pen is an exact science.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 24, 2008 at 03:18 PM
@nrmax88
After witnessing the last 2 seasons Mets fans have every reason to freak out when it comes to their bullpen. And it may be true that building a pen is not an exact science but Minaya sure hasn't figured it out yet.
Posted by: playmaker | November 24, 2008 at 04:43 PM
playmaker-
I'm going to go off on a limb, since my Mets knowledge is limited, and say that the 2007 Mets bullpen was the same as the 2006 Mets bullpen, and the 2006 pen was good.
The 2008 pen, although it needs help, was interesting. You had guys *clearly* underperforming their abilities, in Feliciano, Sanchez, Ayala, and Heilman. You had guys overperforming in Stokes (although BABIP can somewhat explain his horrid 2007 numbers).
Although, the Mets do need a couple more non-"specialist" types, since the majority of the pen is more suited for specialist (LOOGY/ROOGY) roles than anything.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 06:32 PM
nrmax,
agreed that bullpen construction is an inexact science, but if i was a Mets fan i wouldn't be comfortable with the pen with NO changes from the previous year except a new closer borne out of necessity due to Wagner's injury. The first sign of a leak and all of Queens boro will be freaking out and those guys in the pen don't seem to take to the pressure well.
I also agree that we got very lucky with some castoffs but they also mesh very well together.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 24, 2008 at 07:33 PM
"Although, the Mets do need a couple more non-"specialist" types, since the majority of the pen is more suited for specialist (LOOGY/ROOGY) roles than anything."
I really think this was a big issue for them. It seems like so many of their relievers had clear platoon splits that Jerry Manuel had to switch relievers like four times a game to get through 2-3 innings. The Mets just really need some guys that can strikeout both lefties and righties, and pitch for more than 2-3 batters at a time.
I do think that Minaya will do a decent job of figuring it out though, the bullpen's of '07 and '08 can basically be blamed just as much on bad luck as on poor construction.
Posted by: scribbletone | November 24, 2008 at 07:41 PM
melonis rex,
much to my dismay I'm going to defend the Mets here. The 2007 version had one major change. Duaner Sanchez was their 8th inning guy in 2006 and a solid contributor but had an injury where he went on a late night taxi ride (supposedly to get food) and injured his pitching shoulder and needed surgery and was lost for all of 2007 and 2008 was pretty ineffective. That seemed to throw them out of whack since then. They had other issues too non related to taxi rides but that i think hurt a lot.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 24, 2008 at 07:47 PM
scribbletone,
I agree 100%. To me Manuel went nuts with his changes and I think hurt his pitchers with an assumed lack of confidence (which many times was warranted) Where I live I get SNY and couldn't understand all the changes. The Mets had to lead the league in pitching appearances by relievers.
I also think their best candidate for improvement is Heilman. Their worst, Feliciano. I think he's done, but with some confidence, Heilman can have a turnaround similar to what Ryan Madson did for the Phillies this past year.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 24, 2008 at 07:52 PM
Agreed, the night Duaner got into that cab everything started tumbling down hill. Ever since that day, it has always felt like something was just missing. I would be surprised if Heilman doesn't rebound to atleast a 3.60 era, or somewhere in that area. I don't like Feliciano either, I prefer Schoeneweis over him anyday. It can't hurt to see if Duaner bounces back, but I just think he is shot. Besides, the way I see it, if you go out and sign K-Rod, no point in spending 4 million or more on Cruz or some other 7th/8th inning guy. If you aren't signing a big name closer, and you want to spend 15 million between Cruz, Ayala, Beimel and somebody else then fine. But if you commit 15 mil to a closer, then you are only minor pickups through the rest of the pen. A bunch of failed starters, a bunch of kids, and hope one of Heilman/Ayala/Duaner rebounds. If you get one out of the Kunz/Parnell/Holt group to help in the pen, one guy out of a group of retreads/failed starters to help in the pen, and one out of Heilman/Duaner/Ayala to rebound, plus the addition of established closer then that is an enormous improvement in the pen right there. You don't need to get guys that people know. I don't care if nobody has heard of them. Just collect arms and see what sticks.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 24, 2008 at 08:06 PM
i agreed with you all the way up until you said don't sign beimel or cruz.
if i were them, I'd sign Beimel to replace Feliciano and then call it a day. that is after you signed K'rod.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | November 24, 2008 at 08:39 PM
But Show is in the pen, and he takes care of all the LOOGY duties. The Mets don't need two LOOGYs, that's called wasting roster spots and money.
Posted by: melonis rex | November 24, 2008 at 09:20 PM
''To me Manuel went nuts with his changes and I think hurt his pitchers with an assumed lack of confidence (which many times was warranted) Where I live I get SNY and couldn't understand all the changes. The Mets had to lead the league in pitching appearances by relievers.''
It wasn't Manuel's fault. The lefty/righty splits were absolutely ridiculous for most of the members of the bullpen. I'll never forget the visual that they played on SNY during almost every single game that was decided by the bullpen (look below). I mean really, look at Game 162 - Fredy Gonzalez brings in Wes Helms to hit against Schoeneweis after Manuel tries to go lefty-on-lefty, and Helms smacks a game-winning homer against him. Manuel had no choice but to play situational ball all year because his bullpen couldn't get guys out batting from the other side of the plate AT ALL.
Feliciano - .357 against righties, .210 against lefties
Smith - .192 against righties, .320 against lefties
Schoeneweis - .333 against righties, .178 against lefties
Heilman - .222 against righties, .308 against lefties
Sanchez - .268 against righties, .200 against lefties (a lot better than most people would think)
Stokes - .250 against righties, .316 against lefties
(Both righties and lefties hit a healthy .285 and .288 off Ayala).
If you want to keep some of these guys for situational pitching then fine, but to keep this bullpen intact is just ludicrous. Jerry Manuel will lose his mind by May with all the pitching changes he will have to make again.
Bottom line is, we need a power pitcher in the 8th inning. Juan Cruz is the perfect fit for this bullpen - type A pick and all. I'm sick and tired of this mix-and-match bullpen crap - the Mets need a power arm to blow guys away at 98 in the eighth inning and most importantly, to keep them in for the whole inning with a 1 or 2 run lead.
The numbers don't lie - this bullpen is a disaster. Keep a few of the guys from last year if you want, sign a few retreads (most notably, Juan Rincon or Dennys Reyes come to mind), but I highly recommend picking up a closer and a fire arm as a setup man (and not Joe Beimel - Melonis is right, we don't need another LOOGY). This bullpen simply cannot stay the same for the most part as last season.
I get it - the Mets had a solid bullpen in '06, let guys like Bradford (still a big mistake in my book) and Oliver go, tried to run with the same guys in '07 and it was effective until September, and then it all came crashing down for six full months in '08. TIME TO SWITCH IT UP.
Posted by: MattyMets | November 24, 2008 at 10:25 PM