MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Padres Rumors: Greene, Peavy | Main | Odds and Ends: Kawakami, Griffey, Greinke »

Yankees Backup Plans

Ken Davidoff of Newsday lays out the backup plans for the Yankees.

Mark Teixeira would come into play for Brian Cashman if C.C. Sabathia turns down the Yankees' offer.  Davidoff adds that Sabathia would likely turn down the Yankees if Tex turns down the Angels first.  So we could have a scenario where Teixeira signs with the Yankees and Sabathia with the Angels, and neither team addresses its biggest need.  The Yankees could also get in on Manny Ramirez if they fail to sign Sabathia.

There's some hand-wringing coming out of New York as Sabathia continues to sit on the Yankees' huge offer.  I don't think Sabathia's silence sends a message, nor am I convinced he can't get a larger contract.  It's sensible for Sabathia to hear the Angels out, especially with the rumor that they are considering a Johan Santana-like offer.  If the Halos make that offer, the Yankees may have to come back with a seven-year contract worth more than $160MM.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105362241b0970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yankees Backup Plans:

Comments

I can't wait to see the awful moves the Yankees make, continuing their path for self destruction.

Yeah, Signing Tex would be a disaster for the Yanks. Can't wait.

Yes, because past ridiculously large contracts worked out great for the Yankees. 2010: $300,000,000 Payroll, 4th place finish.

It wouldn't be aweful, but his point is that they still don't have any pitching.

All these guys are stupid. If the yankees dont sign him people will laugh at us and say were screwed for this season. But if we do sign him people just say that we buy all are players. But no one will say anything if the angels sign him for more than 140 million, when they were saying the yankees were over paying. The yankees and we the fans cant win either way with other fans.

Yeah Juiced, like you can see the future. Go back under a rock because your team sucks.

Also if we dont get CC, we will get Jake Peavy(which i would want over CC anyway).

The only way Sabathia signs with the Yanks is if their offer is signifcantly above everyone else's offer. If the Angels offer $140, the Yankees will need to up theirs to $160-170. And Tex would be a great signing for anyone - only 28, gold glove, power form both sides of the plate, good clubhouse guy tho somewhat aloof...

There is a bigtime possibility that the Angels might sign both, why is no one laying that down.

Not too sure how signing Teixeira would be a disaster. They are still going to make plays on almost every other big name out there. But Manny to Yanks??? Never gonna happen.

Here's hoping the Yankees sign Sabathia for 7 years, $160M. By 2011 he'll be Bartolo II and Pavano will just be a forgotten tragedy.

yanks12025, its funny right, I haven't read one bad commet about the Angels singing CC for the same amount the Yanks offer. That is why we need to just ignore them all.

No way they will sign both.

is there a chat today Tim?

Yeah Juiced, like you can see the future. Go back under a rock because your team sucks.
---
You can't say any team sucks when your team spends that much money for 3rd place. ROFL

yanks12025 cries about other teams fans hating on the yankees either way and then basically calls someone stupid and tells them to go under a rock cause there team also sucks. Pretty hypocritical and just a purely good example of why mostly everyone hates loud mouth yankee fans. also, where did you get that if the Yankees dont sign CC then they will sign peavy? seems like a bunch of rambling to me. On a lighter note i do like to see that the Yanks are trying to come up with some sort of back up plan whether it be bad in the long run what might happen to them

If the yankees dont get CC, they need an ACE. So i would bet that they make a good push for Peavy(Peavy aint a free agent, you have to trade for him).

This sums up all the silly Yankee haters and the way they view anything the Yanks do:

Zito for 7/123= GOOD
CC for 6/140= BAD

Damon for 4/52=BAD
JD Drew for 5/70= GOOD

Posada for 4/52= BAD
Lowell for 3/38= GOOD

Not trading 3 prospects and spending 137 mil for Santana= STUPID

Signing CC for 6/140=INCREDIBLY STUPID

Any other team wanting to improve their team via free agency= GREAT

Yanks wanting to do the same= EVIL, STUPID and ELITIST.

We're never going to get approval from non-yankee fans so why bother worrying about them.

Why can't the Angels sign both? I don't see it happening but it's possible. Moreno has deep pockets too.

"We're never going to get approval from non-yankee fans so why bother worrying about them."

And you're never going to give approval to Red Sox fans... why should we go first? Every time I've tried to be civil I usually get some reply from a yankee fan or sometimes a jays fan that usually is insulting and juvenile. So, get over it.

"Zito for 7/123= GOOD"

Who besides delusional giant fans say that was a good deal.

Damon for 4/52=BAD
JD Drew for 5/70= GOOD

Posada for 4/52= BAD
Lowell for 3/38= GOOD

Not trading 3 prospects and spending 137 mil for Santana= STUPID

--------------------------------

Finishing in 3rd place and missing the playoffs... Priceless.

For everything else, there's MasterCard.

i love it. in a move to respond to a possible angels signing of sabathia the yankees would get tex and maybe nmanny... people see this as the yankees downfall. forgetting that the yankees with no pitching all year wound up with 89 wins in the toughest division in baseball. get educated.

YanksFan,
Most of those deals you mentioned were bad whether they were Yanks deals or other teams. The Zito deal was terrible. The Drew deal was bad cuz he was injury prone. The only deals you mentioned that were good are the Lowell and Damon deals. I know you are a Yanks fan but can you honestly say the Posada deal was good?

Why are there so many non-yankee fans always commenting on yankee topics. I LOVE the haters.

"Why are there so many non-yankee fans always commenting on yankee topics."

Why were so many non-Red Sox fans commenting on how awful a potential Tazawa signing is?

"yanks12025 cries about other teams fans hating on the yankees either way and then basically calls someone stupid and tells them to go under a rock cause there team also sucks."

no, he told him to go hide under a rock because he said that the yankees suck. not hypocritical at all

Rawbert:

Things can always change but Angel's execs have said it would be one or the other at best. Plus the interest in one would increase once the other was off the table.

"Why were so many non-Red Sox fans commenting on how awful a potential Tazawa signing is?"

because the grass is always greener in NY and Boston.

Dynasty26,
Non-Yankees fans comment on Yankees topics for the same reason Yankees fans comment on non-Yankees topics, because we love to talk about baseball. I read almost every post and the majority of fans seem to be either Yankees, Red Sox, or Cubs fans.

So if you are the Yankees, you wait on tex until CC makes his decision...at least according to the article. But this also feeds into the idea that this is a move to keep the Yankees away from Tex. It's a smart play by the Angels. If they get CC for less $ great...or they let the Yankees get him and they sign Tex. They have played this well. The only way they lose out is if the Yankees sign CC and then go hard after Tex, but otherwise it looks like each time will likely get 1 of these players unless a 3rd party hops in (and not Baltimore or the Nationals).

start_wearing_purple:

People are quick to hold the Yanks responsible or these big contracts extended fto pitcher but refus to understand that it was the Zito, Hampton, Park, Brown deals that set in motion the contract demands for Santana and now for CC. If the Yanks want CC then they pretty much know what it would take to get him and they're willing and able to pay that price so what's the big deal? Get mad at Brian Sabean for signing a riduclously mediocre pitcher on the decline to a record setting contract. Stars should and always will get the most money.

"because the grass is always greener in NY and Boston."

So's the money.

The Yanks signed their all-star catcher who came off of a MVP caliber year at a premium position. How could the Yanks not sign him? What were the alternatives? Molina as a starter? Trading what little prospects for a starting catcher? We probably paid more for Posada than what any other team would've have offered but that's common in sports and I don't have a problem with that. Posada has NEVER had a history of injuries prior and the surgery wasn't as serious as most think. I'm more concerned with Mo being ok for next year than I am for Posada.

I know this has no chance of happening but Tex and Manny in the Yankees lineup is a video game lineup. Can you imagine any team consistently beating this lineup?
1)Damon-LF
2)Jeter-SS
3)Manny-DH
4)A-Rod-3B
5)Teixeira-1B
6)Nady-RF
7)Cano-2B
8)Posada-C
9)Gardner-CF

With Damon/Matsui splitting time at LF that is one dangerous team. Even Yankee haters can admit that team offensively will dominate just about every night.

start_wearing_purple:

I posted a couple of comments about Tazawa, not to hate, but I had questions about his scouting report. The report said that he threw 88-90 mph and I didn't understand what the big deal was. I read most of the other posts and I didn't see many that were negative towards what the Sucks did. However, I thought it was ironic that Igawa's been called "doo doo on a stick" but yet Tazawa with about the same stuff was seen as the "golden child".

If Posada's injury isn't that serious why are there so many rumors that he will be moved to 1st very soon? IMO no catcher should ever make that much $$$ cuz they don't play everyday.

Signing both Mark Teixeira and CC Sabathia during free agency would be feasible financially, but not likely, Angels general manager Tony Reagins said Wednesday. They can afford both.

It looks like the Yanks play in every division.

posts like this^ what does that have to do with baseball? get a life red socks dynasty

RSD - wouldn't you spend Thanksgiving with Madonna, too?

Seriously, do you know anyone who's parents got divorced when they were kids? They didn't spend the holidays together...they were divorced.

And the Evil Empire thing...try growing up a bit.

That was a quote from November 5th.

RSD:

Why are you even concerning yourself with a guys personal matters? How do you know his ex-wife is even welcoming him to spend time with the kids? Should I ask where Varitek is spending his Thanksgiving at or can we keep these posts related to baseball?

Just because the title of the post is Yankees backup plans doesn't mean its only about the Yankees. If you click on Angels rumors this post is listed with them too. If you only wanna hear Yankees fans talk maybe you should go to a Yankees chatroom. This is a baseball website where fans of any team can voice their opinions.

I don't know what rumors you're hearing that says the Yanks plan on moving him to 1st at all? That's all fan/media speculation. Cashman is obviously going after a 1B this winter (Swish or Tex) and wants a REAL 1B there and not a guy playing out of position.

"This is a baseball website where fans of any team can voice their opinions."

so that makes it okay to sh]t on a franchise as you please, and then get upset when yank fans stand up for themselves? i get it

Typical yankees fan arrogance in here. I mean why would anyone besides yankees fans want to comment on a post about almost all the top free agents? Sabathia is waiting for the yankees to bid against themselves which seemed to work well for players signing with the yankees last year. Hollow deadlines threats etc its more of the same, I wonder how much it will cost them this time and how they will try and spin it?

Rawbert:

I can go to just about any team's post and insert a unbiased opinion, rant or thought. You can't tell me that non-Yank fans do not go out of there way to post comments suggesting that everything the Yankees do is wrong and that everything we touch turns to crap. Please don't be so blind. People want to talk about our issues but aren't anywhere near as critical on other teams. It's just the way it is. But we appreciate the hate. It'll make #27 more enjoyable when it comes.

It might be media speculation but they are right once in awhile.

Dude, people do that on every move on this site for even the royals. Get over your haters bs.

Am I missing something? How is it arrogant to say that the Yanks might or should go after the likes of CC, Burnett, Lowe, Teixeira, Man-NY or Oliver Perez? Are they not at varying degrees needs we have? Do we not have the financial ability to spend money this year? No one realistically expects us to get all of them but 2 pitchers and a bat are certainly plausable. And why would a player, other than for family/personal/geographical reasons, not want to play for a team that can a) afford them b) always be a contender ?

Its not standing up for yourself when you are just posting comments saying why are non- Yankees fans in here posting comments.

CMM: I do not think I'd want to spend a Thanksgiving night alone with a man. Well, as for Madonna, he has some sacks on his chest

juiced is one of the examples of people who did not remember how 2006 Red Sox fell. Oh, and GIVEN on how the anti-Yankee crowd speak, it sounds like Yankee fans (who sometimes can get irritating at times) are the only reasonable folks here

I'd love to put Red Sox Dynasty and juiced in my ignore list already, if there was one

It is arrogant to say the only reason people criticize moves is because of the jersey.

Oh... and as for the 'Plan B' itself, it just sounds like media speculation. Did it quote Brian Cashman in any way?

You can criticize all you want but dont make stupid comments based soley on who you root for/against. Someone said it earlier:

If the Angels sign CC= GREAT

If the Yanks sign CC= Boo. It's the 7th sign that the world is coming to an end and the Evil Empire has done it again.

Are the Yanks suppose to stop competing for players until mlb gets a better financial/revenue sharing/salary cap going or can they play by the rules and sign whom they want for what they're willing to pay?

On another note has a winter ever been more quiet for a 29 year old OF who's slugged 40 hrs or better for 5 consecutive seasons? Talks for Adam Dunn have been very quiet this year. I know he's a butcher in the field but you figure there are plenty of AL teams that could use 40 hrs and a .380+ obp.

The lack of buzz on Dunn is a bit strange. Either somebody knows something about him that is not flattering or a couple of teams are quietly working on pursuing him. He is too good and too consistent to not get some interest, especially when you look at what some of these other guys are going to try to get.

"also, where did you get that if the Yankees dont sign CC then they will sign peavy? seems like a bunch of rambling to me."

From prior remarks I've seen, this individual seems convinced that the Yankees are going to sign Sabathia, Burnett, Lowe, Manny and Teixeira and trade Kei Igawa and Hideki Matsui for Peavy and then win 127 games en route to sweeping straight through the playoffs.

"The Yanks signed their all-star catcher who came off of a MVP caliber year at a premium position. How could the Yanks not sign him?"

The Sox let one of the best pitchers in the MLB walk after the 2004 season. He put up great numbers in 2006 and promptly fell apart. The problem with Posada's contract is it was paying for past success with no regards for likely future returns. Posada's 2007 was a statistical aberration compared to the rest of his career and they looked at that and still offered him a contract into his forties. That was an obvious bad signing, even when it was done.

"However, I thought it was ironic that Igawa's been called "doo doo on a stick" but yet Tazawa with about the same stuff was seen as the "golden child"."

Not really. It would be ironic if the Sox were putting up a lofty posting fee and then signing him to a rather lengthy contract. The Tazawa move is a smart one for a team like the Sox. They're taking a gamble on a medium potential prospect, essentially, and they're putting a rather low commitment to it by their standards. Tazawa may never make it in the majors, but the Sox didn't break bank on him. Igawa was projected as terrible in the MLB, ended up BEING terrible in the MLB and the Yankees spent close to fifty million getting him in a pretty clear reactionary move to the Matsuzaka signing. There's no reasonable comparison between the Igawa deal and the Tazawa deal.

Get over yourself. No one is saying it exactly like that it is purely your perception. Anyway one obvious difference would be the large contracts the yankees already have as opposed to the angels. Too many sheltered yankees fans have trouble adapting to reality. It would be troublesome to see yankees sign a large amount of the top free agents mainly because I cannot remember a time it happened but no big deal if they give sabathia a lot. No matter who signs him it is a big risk for a pitcher and I think many think it is at least troublesome that one of the best pitchers in the game is a free agent and only a handful of teams could even consider him realistically. Observe neither point has anything to do specifically with the yankees.

M. Ramirez to yanks 09

DH

Manny to the yanks would be pretty monumental even for new york standards

z

"If the Angels sign CC= GREAT

If the Yanks sign CC= Boo. It's the 7th sign that the world is coming to an end and the Evil Empire has done it again."

Honestly, I think anyone signing Sabathia to more than a four year deal is playing with fire. He's swiftly developing a pattern of postseason ineptitude and I simply do not trust his build. I really don't think he's going to be a viable ace in four years and he's certainly no Santana.

A pissing contest between Yankee fans and Red Sox fans about how much their teams are despised and ridiculed. Funny stuff.

Also part of the reason the rest of us do despise you. Of course ESPN reporting every Pedroia hangnail and Papelbon dance like it's a top story and the blowhard that is Hank Steinbrenner don't help either.

"DH

Manny to the yanks would be pretty monumental even for new york standards"

The problem with Manny at DH is more the fact there's a logjam at the position for the Yanks. If they could inexplicably offload Matsui and replace Posada with someone younger, I'd consider a three year deal for Manny expressly intending him as DH might work. Any other scenario would seem potentially disastrous to me.

The other problem is his disdain for attention. His biggest problem, year after year after year, in Boston was the omnipresent and scathing media attention and intense scrutiny he was constantly under. NY is the only place in the entire MLB he could go where that would actually be worse. If he hated Boston, I imagine he'd be crying for a trade by the middle of April in NY.

I actually hope the Yankees sign CC. I just hope his huge contract doesn't affect other future pitching free agents too much. I would hate to see every 15 game winner ask for 20M a year.

Obsession:

I don't think I ever compared the deals at all. I could care less how much they spend on him. All I asked was "what was the big deal with this guy" based upon the his mediocre scouting reprt?

I'm not really sure that the Yankees signing Teix should be construed as not addressing their biggest need. Personally I think the club's need for starting pitching has been a bit overblown, obviously they need to fill some spots in the rotation but I never agreed that they needed CC and one of Lowe or Burnett plus Pettitte and still don't. I think they'd be just fine signing either CC or Burnett plus Pettitte and/or someone like Jon Garland. That would still be far better than what they had last year, when they won 89 games in a very tough division with a complete patchwork rotation where Sidney Ponson was the no. 3 starter for a solid month.

Signing Teix would fill a huge need too, a no. 3 hitter with good power and decent patience. For those of us who actually watched all the games last year and remember all too well about Giambi's epic failure with RISP, we know the importance of providing A-Rod with adequate protection around him in the lineup. Signing Teix to hit in front of him allows Matsui, an excellent situational hitter, to bat behind him, so that would be a very valuable pickup.

I'm a semi-new reader (of the comments section, been reading the posts forever) here and a first time poster, and I have to say that some of this analysis from non-Yankee fans is downright comical. Most of you seem to know very little about the team and can only posit tangential arguments that dont have much to do with baseball.

Rawbert:

That cat's already out the bad (see Bary Zito deal 7/123 including later salaries of 20 mil per).

Yanks78: Regarding Tazawa, didn't the Yanks send Stick to Japan to scout him and a few other players? I'm sure other posters will cry about this, but bearing in mind how underwhelmed he was, that's all I really need to know to feel that there's a good chance we aren't missing out on much here.

Obssesion:

Man-NY hated the BOSTON media. I didn't see him shying away from the cameras in LA. It's a big difference.

"Honestly, I think anyone signing Sabathia to more than a four year deal is playing with fire. He's swiftly developing a pattern of postseason ineptitude and I simply do not trust his build. I really don't think he's going to be a viable ace in four years and he's certainly no Santana."

A pattern of pstseason ineptitude? That is "fan-talk" and has no basis in reality. It's the result of a tiny sample size.

I don't trust his build? Okay, any pitcher is a risk to hurt themselves...any pitcher. The fact of the matter is that CC was not overworked his first couple of seasons in MLB and he has held-up with the workload of the past 2 seasons. he is at an age where if there were obvious signs of a future breakdown we would likely have seem them already (think Pedro struggling after 100 pitches). CC is a big power pitcher with a smooth and repeatable delivery...thise things historically translate into good health for pitchers (again, any pitcher can get hurt at any time).

He's not going to be a reliable ace in 4 years....why not? Unless he gets injured there is no reason to think that CC would not be wildly effective for at least the next 5-7 years. Power pitchers age better than finesse pitchers (Clemens, Schilling and RJ) and big guys age better than small guys (think Pedro who generates speed with a whip-like motion and a small frame).

Santanna was actually more worrisome due to his loss of velocity at the end of '07 and his reluctance to throw his slider (usually signs of injury). But Johan had a great year and gave no indication that he is anything other than great.

Obsession:

Honestly, I think anyone signing Sabathia to more than a four year deal is playing with fire. He's swiftly developing a pattern of postseason ineptitude and I simply do not trust his build. I really don't think he's going to be a viable ace in four years and he's certainly no Santana.

______________________________

CC is only 28 years old. Has never been on the DL and I've heard plently of "experts" say that CC's frame is perfect or a hard throwing durable pitcher. With the Yanks I would expect to see his inning reduced down to around 200-215 innings. There isn't a need for him to go 9 innings every time out. And really, I think injuries are more of a concern for fans than it is for GM's. You don't want to be careless but most of these deals are insured. Yes premiums may go up and the insurance world isn't exactly strong right now but all in all every top pitcher has some concerns. CC is the healthiest of all the available FA not named Lowe but even Lowe can't be counted on so much at age 36.

I bet you the Giants would love Zito's arm to fall off so they can write that contract off the books. I know......bad bad YanksFan...

CMM, You have teh same counterintuitive logic I keep seeing used as an odd justification to the intelligence of signing Sabathia long-term. To paraphrase, any pitcher can get hurt at any time. Last time I checked Sabathia was any pitcher. That is why it is dangerous to sign any pitcher to long-term big money deals. Once again sabathia is any pitcher and will be getting the biggest money ever for a long time. But sure nothing to worry about anyone can get injured.

Also 78 I think you might want to study up a little bit on how exactly a contract comes of the books.

yanks backup plan # 276:

Be content with being the 4th best team in their division.

I wonder how much speculation we will see about their backup plans if one of these guys actually signs with someone else. Seems like the reporters cannot get any info on the negotiations or they are just moving too slow so they are making excuses to pass speculation off to the masses. I highly doubt the yankees are spending a lot of time worrying about the unlikely scenarios of them missing various players.

WOB - There is inherent risk in signing any pitcher, but if you want to go out and sign a free agent pitcher who happens to be really good you HAVE to accept the risk and add the years to the contract. Therefore, if you are going to sign a FE pitcher all you can do is your homework and limit the risk as much as possible. With that, CC makes sense - young, big guy, good mechanics, no history of injuries. Otherwise, you will lose out to other teams.

Also, remember, when anyone signs a FA you are almost never getting fair-market value. You are buying someone at peak-value because it is a bidding process.

Risk is everywhere, so risk managment is crucial. The Giants did a terrible job with Zito, as all of the signs pointed to a pitcher in decline.

I'd love to put Red Sox Dynasty and juiced in my ignore list already, if there was one

Posted by: The Goggles Do Nothing |

----
Typical yanks fan. See what you want to see, hear what you want to hear! rofl

"Man-NY hated the BOSTON media. I didn't see him shying away from the cameras in LA. It's a big difference."

There's a big difference between the Boston media and the LA media, yes. LA is primarily a basketball town, not baseball. He said his favorite thing was that people didn't seem to recognize him a lot of the time. NYC is a big baseball town primarily and their media is almost identical to Boston's, except bigger. It would be essentially out of the frying pan and into the fryer.

"A pattern of pstseason ineptitude? That is "fan-talk" and has no basis in reality. It's the result of a tiny sample size."

Small sample size or not, he suddenly hit a wall two postseasons in a row. That is the definition of a pattern. In 25 postseason innings, he has close to an 8 ERA with a WHIP of 2.2.

"The fact of the matter is that CC was not overworked his first couple of seasons in MLB and he has held-up with the workload of the past 2 seasons."

Considering the Yankees' bullpen troubles the last couple of years (Outside of Rivera and, to an extent, Chamberlain, they've not had a reliable consistent arm out there), Sabathia's probably going to see a lot of work there, especially considering there's been virtually zero talk about the Yankees trying to shore up their relief corps. The problem will likely only be exacerbated.

"he is at an age where if there were obvious signs of a future breakdown we would likely have seem them already (think Pedro struggling after 100 pitches)."

Many pitchers struggle after 100 pitches and it's incredibly rare for a starter to top that consistently. Heck, Sabathia actually didn't generally go far past 100 pitches himself. What evidence supports the notion he'd be showing his problems now? He's only twenty-eight. Giving him something past a four year deal is when you start getting into the years where he'd start showing age and at a contract like that, he'd be almost impossible to move.

"Unless he gets injured there is no reason to think that CC would not be wildly effective for at least the next 5-7 years. Power pitchers age better than finesse pitchers (Clemens, Schilling and RJ) and big guys age better than small guys (think Pedro who generates speed with a whip-like motion and a small frame)."

Top tier power pitches age better than finesse pitchers, but most power pitchers effectively fall apart quicker and hit a wall much more suddenly, unless they learn to be power pitchers. Look at Mussina. His 2007 was absolute, irredeemable garbage because he'd lost his fastball. He redeemed himself with a stellar 2008 by molding himself into a finesse pitcher. Hell, people say Wakefield could potentially pitch close to fifty because he relies on a gimmick pitch that's easy on the arm slot, rather than the violent wear of a pitcher who relies upon velocity. For examples, look at your own examples of Schilling and Johnson, both of whom absolutely fell apart due to losing a step on their velocity. And as for the big guys, you're looking at a different class of "big guys." Schilling and Clemens were big, muscular types (Each about 6'4", 215-220ish). Johnson was lanky (6'10", 225). Sabathia is three inches shorter and has about 25 pounds on Johnson and thirty on Clemens and Schill. The difference is all three were built guys, Sabathia is reputably chunky. It doesn't take much research. Just GIS them all. Clemens was a built dude, as was Schilling in his prime. Johnson was slender. Sabathia's body type is closer to Curt Schilling of late or David Wells. Wells had a promising start to his career, but he was never a staff ace.

YanksFanSince78,

I'm not one of the people arguing that signing Sabathia would be a bad move for the Yankees (although I do question their hesitancy to trump the Mets' offer last offseason).

But keep in mind that while we don't know exactly what the terms of insurance contracts on players are, it is generally known that the terms only cover 50-75% of the contract's value, and have very specific requirements as to how much time a player has to spend on the disabled list to qualify (recall the Bagwell debacle). Add in the fact that such risky insurance carries heavy premiums (putting aside the Yankees' deep pockets), and it's not as simple as saying, "Even if he gets injured, they're covered."

For the record, I think Sabathia is the best parking spot for the Yankees' money truck this offseason. Please stop carelessly attaching "hater" labels to anyone who points out the risks inherent in such a signing and the fact that they haven't worked out for the Yankees in the past.

Furthermore, not everyone who questions the Yankees M.O. gives a free pass to other teams and their signings. I am a Red Sox fan who thought the Lowell signing was understandable given the market, but ultimately unwise and reactionary. I also criticized the Red Sox harshly for giving Drew a shot at five years when it wasn't even clear that another team would offer three. This is why I can also criticize the Yankees for flip-flopping during their A-Rod negotiations and ultimately throwing out a contract so much higher than any other team's offer that the overage could feed several small countries.

Claiming that reasoned criticism amounts to "hating on" a team is akin to claiming that anyone who challenges a government action is unpatriotic. That tactic resonates with some, but only for so long.

This sums up all the silly Yankee haters and the way they view anything the Yanks do:

Zito for 7/123= GOOD
CC for 6/140= BAD

Damon for 4/52=BAD
JD Drew for 5/70= GOOD

Posada for 4/52= BAD
Lowell for 3/38= GOOD

Not trading 3 prospects and spending 137 mil for Santana= STUPID

Signing CC for 6/140=INCREDIBLY STUPID

Any other team wanting to improve their team via free agency= GREAT

Yanks wanting to do the same= EVIL, STUPID and ELITIST.

We're never going to get approval from non-yankee fans so why bother worrying about them.

Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | November 25, 2008 at 01:12 PM

Dude, keep playing the vicim, you work it so well.....

All of those signings were bad (minus CC cause we don't know what will happen), except for the Santana one. It's amazing, no Yankee fan will admit they screwed up by not trading 3 players who completely flopped this year for a proven ace that did great this year, and would have easily been the ace that you could have ridden into the playoffs instead of relying on Ponson or whatever other trash you had out there.

Drew signing=completely terrible.

Posada signing=bad but not as bad as drew.

Zito signing=worst ever

"There is inherent risk in signing any pitcher, but if you want to go out and sign a free agent pitcher who happens to be really good you HAVE to accept the risk and add the years to the contract. Therefore, if you are going to sign a FE pitcher all you can do is your homework and limit the risk as much as possible. With that, CC makes sense - young, big guy, good mechanics, no history of injuries. Otherwise, you will lose out to other teams."

That's the complete opposite of the mentality of every single successful pitching franchise of the last decade. Hell, of all the pitching moves the Sox have made since Epstein came in and followed the Oakland philosphy on pitching length, the only contract the Sox have offered to a pitcher over thirty for more than three years was Schilling, and they got all of one good season out of him.

Guys like Zito are starting a trend of bad decisions in terms of signing pitchers at lengthy contract terms and his has born out time and again that this is, far more often than not, a terrible idea.

walkoffblast:

In case of a signfigant career ending injury (And I wasn't wishing that on him) the Giants, I'm sure' have insured the contract. While the money would still be owed to Zito, the insurer would have to cut a check for what ever amount they are liable for and that would at least offset the amount due to Zito.

"But keep in mind that while we don't know exactly what the terms of insurance contracts on players are, it is generally known that the terms only cover 50-75% of the contract's value, and have very specific requirements as to how much time a player has to spend on the disabled list to qualify (recall the Bagwell debacle). Add in the fact that such risky insurance carries heavy premiums (putting aside the Yankees' deep pockets), and it's not as simple as saying, "Even if he gets injured, they're covered.""

Note that this isn't even accounting for the gigantic stink that the Union would create in a matter like this.

Obssesions wrote w/ regards to CC:

Small sample size or not, he suddenly hit a wall two postseasons in a row. That is the definition of a pattern. In 25 postseason innings, he has close to an 8 ERA with a WHIP of 2.2.

_______________________

So 4 post season starts in the last 2 years is enough of a sampling size for you to determine that he's a post-season bust?

Beside IMO judging whether or not to sign a player based soley off of their post-season record is a stupid thing to do. W/o a pitcher of CC's caliber the Yanks may not have to worry about what he may or may not do in the playoffs because we might not be there ourselves. Just as stupid would be to sign Lowe based upon how tough he might've been 4 years ago when he pitched for the Sucks in the post-season.

So Yankee fans, how can plan B be Teixeira if you will sign him ANYWAY?

Oh, and then, of course, you will sign Lowe or Burnett too, then most likely a trade for Peavy without trading Hughes or Jackson.

You just wont even need a plan B because you will for SURE get everyone.

Most Yankee fans on here are funny.

btw, my first post that should read:

Victim.

My keyboard is worn out.

CMM, you cannot only point out the favorable many of which have not been proven to be a large factor. What about the number of pitches he has thrown the last couple years? He is a big guy that has had issues with being in shape at times. Anyone remember the beginning of this year. I would be a little worried that fat contract = fat pitcher. The length of the contract is a huge factor in risk management, that is all I am really saying.

Obsessions - CC was overwoeked and tired by the postseason the past 2 years. His arm slot was dropping (sign of fatigue) which flattens out your slider and hurts location overall.

The postseason is just more games. Get over this myth about "being clutch" or "knowing how to win".

The Yankees bullpen in '08 was actually pretty strong and should continue to be in '09 as they have good depth and a number of power arms to use.

The 100 pitch comment was to show that there are no signs of injury at this point. His velocity was strong, even at the end of the year.

This last part you couldn't be more wrong. Mussina was NEVER a power pitcher. Schilling had an injury that hurt him and Johnson is 44 years old. A power pitcher is a guy who can dominate with his FB and that is what CC is capable of. He is 6'7" and strong, so get over his size and stop with the Wells and Colon comparisons. One was never that good and the other dominated with his curve and change-up.

Obsessions:

CC is not an obese player. He is very athletic for a big guy. I live in CLeveland and have been around CC on a few occasions.

You referenced Randy J and his problems were based on a chronic back problem.

Clemens may have had some "help" with his situation. But keep in mind that none of those players experienced problems until after they hit their late 30's. CC is only 28, has never been injured and has only topped 200 innings three times in his 8 year career. I'm sure the Yanks will do their homework if it gets to the point where there's a physical. If he signs a 7 year deal he'll be 35 years old. Clemens, Schilling and Johnsons experienced major problems at ages (Schil-39, Clemens-45 and Johnson-40).

Wakefield is an exception on his contarct for the Red Sox, Beckett was traded for, Schilling was not 28 years old when they signed him, Lester and Bucholtz are under contract and Dice-K was signed to a reasonable deal after they paid $51 million for that right, so they did spend a lot for Dice-K even if it isn;t in the contract.

DunkinDOnuts:

I will never , ever act as if the Yanks are beyond reproach or that people aren't entitled to having and voicing opinions. But if you can't accept that SOME posters come on to a Yankee post and spew rants soley based on their hatred for the Yanks then you are really naive and closed minded. I don't mind the hate. Please name me one board post that DOESN'T bash the Yanks for wanting to sign a FA. And it's comical how the Yanks get bashed for overpaying for players that have a SPECIAL value to them (i.e Jeter, Arod, Mariano, Pettite and Posada) but no one ever accepts that most of the MAJOR FA precedent signings have been made by other teams other than the Yanks (Soriano, Hampton, Brown, Zito, Tori Hunter, Rowand, Man-NY Ramirez, Todd Helton, Andru Jones, Bartolo COlon, jason Schmigt, etc).

The Yanks made a bad deal for Giambi in terms of # of years and the fact that they knew he may have been a steroid user. The fact that his deal was loaded on the back end when he's in his late 30's made it worse. Pavano was a bad luck deal but his numbers 4/40 were no where near precedent setting when he signed it. There were plently of lesser players who were making more than he was at the time. If you want to criticize then at least look at the big picture and understant that the Yanks are not the cause of all the industries woes (unless you want to point back to the 1970's when we were the 1st to dive into FA). But at least then we were going hard after the true stars and future HOF's (Jackson, Winfield, Henderson, etc).

So conveniently leaving Arod out I see. Derek Jeter has the largest total contract of anyone not named Arod ever.

CMM, I think you are proving his point for him. He is saying that free agency is a terrible way to build your pitching staff because of the obscene cost.

Ivdown wrote:

Dude, keep playing the vicim, you work it so well.....

All of those signings were bad (minus CC cause we don't know what will happen), except for the Santana one. It's amazing, no Yankee fan will admit they screwed up by not trading 3 players who completely flopped this year for a proven ace that did great this year, and would have easily been the ace that you could have ridden into the playoffs instead of relying on Ponson or whatever other trash you had out there.

Drew signing=completely terrible.

Posada signing=bad but not as bad as drew.

Zito signing=worst ever

________________________


I hate stupid statements like this. Did I or anyone on this post say the Yanks were not wrong for NOT making this deal? For the record, I agreed with Cash because at the time we thought Melky was our CF of the future and only had Damon as the other in house option and we wanted Kennedy to be part of our staff. Was it a mistake? Judging by what we know today? Yes. But the idea of drafting, nurturing and playing our own players was refreshing.

Understand this; the Yanks have made many mistakes. But not every trade, player drafted or FA signing has been a mess. I'm more than satisfied with the Damon FA signing. I think he's been a great lead off hitter and has given us 2 out 3 really good years. Admittedly I like him much better in LF than CF but that's a mistake being made by the coach not the player. People say we don't develope players but give no mention of guys like Wang, Cano, Soriano, Melky and Joba that have come up in the last 4 years.

WOB - there is nothing wrong with adding pitching via FA, but it has to be the right guy. CC for 7 years is much less of a gamble than Burnett for 5 years or Lowe for $18 million for 4+ years. Heck, Sheets doesn't look so bad at 2-3 years to limit the risk.
The high cost is meaningless if you sign the right guy and you win.

walkoffblast wrote:

So conveniently leaving Arod out I see. Derek Jeter has the largest total contract of anyone not named Arod ever.
_____________________
As you know Arod was signed to a 10 yr $250 mil deal by the Texas Rangers. He came to NY along with a truck load of cash paid by Texas. After 5 years of avg 42 hrs and 123 rbis were we suppose to offer him a pay cut? The Yanks deal with Arod transcends what he does on the field and will pay for itself many times over (hopefully that will include some rings). Jeter signed a 189 mil/10 year deal when he was 26 coming off of 4 ws titles (Feb 2001). In terms of total dollars it was big but it was trumped by the 25 mil per that the Rangers signed Arod (Dec 2000) to and the 20 mil per that Boston signed w/ Ramirez (Dec 2000)

walkoffblast:

CMM, I think you are proving his point for him. He is saying that free agency is a terrible way to build your pitching staff because of the obscene cost.

________________________

Diamondbacks 2001 staff:
Schilling and Johnson

Boston Red Sox 2004 staff:
Martinez and Schilling (effective FA: both trade and sign deals)

"The Yanks deal with Arod transcends what he does on the field and will pay for itself many times over "

I'd love to hear why. Actually I'd love to know what that even means.

So what is the point of stating a bunch of contract numbers with your personal justification? Your big contracts do not count because you know reasons why they were done? Every team had a reason when they gave out large contract, so what?Everyone with 4 rings gets 2nd largest contract in baseball history?
The yankees paid clemens an average annual of over 28 million. What about mariano's current contract?

The yankees currently have the highest paid c,ss,3b and closer. No other team has more than one of the highest paid players at any position.

CMM, you are using grade school logic. If you pick the right one it works. Really? Ever consider the converse? Sure you can find one good guy here and there in free agency but you cannot build your staff that way especially the top half of it. The point is the top guys do not sign low risk deals as you are pointing out. So they come at a high cost, with high years ergo high risk.

I'm so freakin' bored. I want trades and signings and concrete deals to discuss!!!

Do you know what a free agent signing is? Schilling to the red sox was not a free agent signing. Also are you aware of the time frames we are talking about? You find one success story from 7 years ago that is not even completely accurate because they had to deal the pitchers because they cost too much. What about the crippling failures? Hampton, zito etc. It has failed many more times than it has worked.

Haha...walkoffblast you were pointing to the fact that Jeter has the 2nd biggest contract and I was pointing out to you that your statement was not exactly true considering the avg yearly salary and that the precedent was set by Arod and Man-NY. Thats all.

As for the Arod deal recently signed the dollars have more to do with the merc/ratings that will be generated if he makes a march towards breaking Bonds record. If that were not a realistic goal then I doubt the Yanks make that deal at all. Sometimes you have to see things for what they are. Same reason the Giants signed Bonds to a 1 yr 16 mil deal the year he was approaching the record.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.