![]() |
|
|
| |
« Marquis Unlikely For Rockies | Main | Cubs Rumors: Hermida, Bradley, Roberts »
7:05pm: LEN3 says the Twins would want more than Donald for Young, but it's a moot point because the Phillies don't want to trade Donald. The teams haven't spoken lately and don't have plans to meet in the near future.
Neal also says there's nothing going on between the Twins and Giants.
4:20pm: LEN3 says the Twins do like Donald. Neal also believes the rumor about the Giants being interested in Young.
One other fresh note from Neal's blog post - Dennys Reyes "might be on the Reds' radar."
1:26pm: According to Paul Hagen of the Philadelphia Daily News, the Phillies have inquired on Twins outfielder Delmon Young. Hagen believes the Twins would want shortstop prospect Jason Donald in return.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536461a23970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Phillies Interested In Delmon Young?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
On paper it would seem that Young would be a great fit, but his personality would never work in Philly. Besides giving up Donald is way too much, when we'll need him in the future for 3rd.
Posted by: Phillys Phinest | December 08, 2008 at 01:34 PM
I think giving up Donald would be too much for Young considering his past.
Posted by: UtleyFan | December 08, 2008 at 01:37 PM
I can't imagine the Twins trading Young without getting a lot more than Donald in return, considering they gave up Matt Garza and Jason Bartlett for Young and Brendan Harris a year ago. Unfortunately, the Phils' main position of organizational depth is catcher, where the Twins have one of the best in the business, Joe Mauer. I don't see a match here unless Young's going really cheaply.
Posted by: ColonelTom | December 08, 2008 at 01:37 PM
Y'all are crazy if you think Donald's too much to give up for Young. The Phils would do that deal in a heartbeat.
Posted by: ColonelTom | December 08, 2008 at 01:38 PM
It wouldn't just be Donald straight up...it'd be Young for Donald and most likely a major league releiver...the deal would never get done
Posted by: Phillys Phinest | December 08, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Donald is not going to be our 3rd basement. he would have moved there already if they thought he was capable of it. why are the phils considering him isnt he a left handed hitter? we need a right handed bat amaro
Posted by: derman1984 | December 08, 2008 at 01:43 PM
I agree with Utley probably starting the season on the 15-Day DL, we will need Donald at 2nd. The only way Donald gets traded is for starting pitching and another prospect or signing is hitting the cover of the ball in spring training.
Posted by: Lumpster | December 08, 2008 at 01:44 PM
Im thinking the Twins would sell low just to get Young out of there. Gardenshire dislikes the guy and the possibility he puts up similar numbers to last year is to great for a contending team.
Posted by: BaseBallz | December 08, 2008 at 01:45 PM
Donald bats from the right not left.
Posted by: Sam | December 08, 2008 at 01:47 PM
Please - Twins need SS/3B help now, not a "can't miss" that hasn't played over AA. If they sell low on Young now Smith should be fired.
Posted by: jhawk90 | December 08, 2008 at 01:48 PM
Forget his Talent.. his personality would fit just fine. He would be come quick friends with Howard and Especially Rollins. Rollins put Howard under a roof early in his career and Rollins or Howard would do the same with Young. If the Phillies can get this done by trading Donald... Do it.
Posted by: GM Jacobs | December 08, 2008 at 01:48 PM
Donald is a RH bat. Let me throw some info out there. Made top prospects of AFL list. 2nd best batting average of AFL. 3rd most doubles in AFL. Tied for 9th most triples in AFL. Top 5 in OBP. Top 3 in SLG%. 2nd in OPS. I'm not saying that Donald is a superstar waiting to happen, but he CAN PLAY ALL INF Positions. The Phils may need fill ins at 2nd and 3rd. Unless the Phils are getting a stone cold lock at 2nd, he needs to stay.
Posted by: Lumpster | December 08, 2008 at 01:54 PM
Looks good to me for both sides, though someone should do a list of what they think other returns could be for each player.
Posted by: kinsler5 | December 08, 2008 at 02:04 PM
delmon young bats RH derman....
Posted by: mr utley | December 08, 2008 at 02:05 PM
for some reason i thought he was left handed. i guess its because that is the direction he threw the bat at the ump. but i do like his talent. and reports are saying that utley is going to be back mid april so brunlett would just fine for the first two weeks. i would rather have donald start in triple a just in case he craps the bed and his value goes down.
Posted by: derman1984 | December 08, 2008 at 02:27 PM
This deal would never get done. Smith needs to hold on to Delmon, because Donald for Delmon is just not a good idea.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 08, 2008 at 02:28 PM
Young is the author of a career .306/.341/.449 line vs. lefties. We could do a lot worse than platooning him out there with Dobbs or Jenkins and hoping he develops into an everday player, a la Jayson Werth.
Posted by: Bourne's_Identities | December 08, 2008 at 02:29 PM
everyone always said Lidge would never work out too and look what happened. There's enough good in that clubhouse to outweigh the bad. I'd give up Donald if they would do it. I wouldn't add much to it though, maybe Kendrick?? Heck I would've considered Dye for Donald and Kendrick, why not a much younger guy who's controllable for several more years. Imagine the athleticism in 3+ years of Young, Taylor and Dominic Brown.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 08, 2008 at 02:37 PM
"Tied for 9th most triples in AFL"
I love stats more than most, and even I say who gives a sh*t what a completely meaningless piece of information.
Scott Sizemore was 2nd in OPS in the AFL last year, Kevin Frandsen in '06, Eric Duncan led in '05.
The kid has talent but you trade him 1000 times out of a 1000 for Delmon Young if thats the deal.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | December 08, 2008 at 02:43 PM
Maybe playing on his third team in 3 years gives him an attitude adjustment. I would take a chance on the kid who has such a high upside and doesn't reach FA in a couple of years.
Posted by: Sam | December 08, 2008 at 02:49 PM
Any Philly fan that doesn't want to trade Jason Donald for a guy who has been playing in the bigs since age 19 and been compared to Griffey in raw talent is crazy.
Delmon may have some personal issues so far, but few players are talented enough to get almost 1400 at bats before their 23rd birthday. Donald is a year older and is in AA... Delmon is already a mid-level major league player at age 22 and will most likely become very good. He's also cheap and a plus defender to boot.
The Phillies would be fools not to pursue this.
with is crazy talented and a low risk/high reward move at this point.
Posted by: jclay | December 08, 2008 at 03:11 PM
There are definitely options out there for an infield reserve at a reasonable price. Ramon Vazquez would be a perfect fit for the Phils - a lefty bat, gets on base, and can play 2B and 3B (and SS in a pinch). Nick Punto is another possibility. Moving Donald wouldn't stop them from filling that need.
Posted by: ColonelTom | December 08, 2008 at 03:29 PM
Makes sense since the Phillies LOVE toolsy outfielders.
Posted by: Sam | December 08, 2008 at 03:33 PM
I wouldn't be stunned to see Ryan Madson move in a deal, if the Phils can get another setup guy (Juan Cruz?) as a free agent. Madson and Donald might be enough to get the Twins to part with Young, and would still be a good deal for the Phils. Madson's about to start getting expensive in arbitration, so don't be shocked to see him moved in the right deal.
Posted by: ColonelTom | December 08, 2008 at 03:33 PM
^^ I would definitely be surprised to see Madson go in a deal, although I do see your logic. Peak value right now, and most likely going to walk in a year
All I have to say is you better sign Cruz first before moving Ryan. And also, that's a lot to pay for a completely unproven (although very talented) OF
That's why I don't like Young as a target...MIN would make you pay a premium for his potential, and I wouldn't feel comfortable taking that risk
Posted by: wayne gomes | December 08, 2008 at 04:10 PM
jclay- Agreed.
Which is why the Twins shouldn't move Delmon.
Posted by: melonis rex | December 08, 2008 at 04:28 PM
If Jason Donald is available you better believe that the Baltimore Orioles would be calling every 2 seconds...
Posted by: fearthechant | December 08, 2008 at 04:35 PM
hmmm delmon young.. number one overall pick.. hits 300 with no problem. hasnt come close to his prime.. rocket arm.. okay defense.. plus plus power in the future.
for a good prospect.. yeah sign me up right now.
Posted by: 661dodgerblue | December 08, 2008 at 04:40 PM
For Twins fans who watched every day...Young's +/- in LF last year was shockingly bad, worse than Burrell. And yet he apparently has good speed
Was it a case of poor instincts or inexperience at the position (first full season in LF)?
Posted by: wayne gomes | December 08, 2008 at 04:45 PM
I'd be surprised (more like shocked) in the short-term if Delmon Young outperformed Werth.
While the deal sounds like a great fit on paper in terms of long-term needs, the Phillies would be taking a substantial step backwards from Burrell to Delmon Young in the short-term. Young's (prior) attitude issues make this seem less attractive to me. The Phillies are built to win now.
Posted by: TNS | December 08, 2008 at 04:51 PM
(Let me make it clear, I think in terms of value, Delmon Young for Donald is a deal you do in a heartbeat but I'm not sure it's as great a fit on paper for the Phillies in the short-term as it seems.)
Posted by: TNS | December 08, 2008 at 04:54 PM
"why are the phils considering him isnt he a left handed hitter? we need a right handed bat amaro why are the phils considering him isnt he a left handed hitter? we need a right handed bat amaro "
Delmon is RH all the way, arm and bat.
"While the deal sounds like a great fit on paper in terms of long-term needs, the Phillies would be taking a substantial step backwards from Burrell to Delmon Young in the short-term. Young's (prior) attitude issues make this seem less attractive to me. The Phillies are built to win now."
Thing is, Pat the Bat likely isn't coming back, and Young is a competent replacement, if nothing else. Honestly, if they do get Young, they should move Werth back to LF and play Young in RF, where he belongs. Also, that band box is a nice place for him to develop his power, and the Phillies like speed as well. Seems like an excellent fit.
Posted by: AA | December 08, 2008 at 05:02 PM
Defensively Young had a few problems last year. He hurt his ankle at one point and never sat to rest it. Left field in MN is both large and difficult due to some unfortunate lighting behind home plate. (The Twins typically play better fielders in left than right.) So while I wouldn't go as far as calling him a plus fielder, he's probably not as bad as he looked in 08.
Posted by: Cris E | December 08, 2008 at 05:22 PM
he might now put up the power numbers that pat put up but i do like the idea of his 300 average and stealing bases. his power will come there is a reason he was a number 1 pick
Posted by: derman1984 | December 08, 2008 at 05:22 PM
They may take a step back in power and OBP from Pat in the short term, but Delmon is a much better defender and no one would be shocked to see a massive power explosion from him over the next couple seasons. Especially if he were to move from Minnesota to that band box in Philly.
If I were running the Phils I'd give Donald and Madsen. I'm pretty sure Madsen only has one more season under team control too so it's not a huge loss. They could take the money they're saving from Madsen and Burrell's '08 contracts and put it towards a new 8th inning guy. Try to get someone like Isringhausen, Hoffman, or Cordero to take a setup role.... unless they can convince Wood or Fuentes to come in as a setup guy.
Posted by: jclay | December 08, 2008 at 05:24 PM
"Defensively Young had a few problems last year. He hurt his ankle at one point and never sat to rest it. Left field in MN is both large and difficult due to some unfortunate lighting behind home plate. (The Twins typically play better fielders in left than right.) So while I wouldn't go as far as calling him a plus fielder, he's probably not as bad as he looked in 08."
Remember too that Young was not particularly used to playing that side of the field, which is important when it comes to reading the ball off the bat and getting breaks off balls. He really is wasted at that position, considering his speed and arm strength.
He will certainly be better than Burrell.
"They could take the money they're saving from Madsen and Burrell's '08 contracts and put it towards a new 8th inning guy. Try to get someone like Isringhausen, Hoffman, or Cordero to take a setup role.... unless they can convince Wood or Fuentes to come in as a setup guy."
Wood and Fuentes wont take set up money. I don't see an issue in keeping Madsen, though the Twinkies are more likely to do the deal if Madsen is the guy as opposed to Romero.
"he might now put up the power numbers that pat put up but i do like the idea of his 300 average and stealing bases. his power will come there is a reason he was a number 1 pick"
Young also improved his patience, which is important. I have no doubt that he can regularly hit .310/.350/.500.
Posted by: AA | December 08, 2008 at 05:32 PM
I'm goin to contradict what I said earlier, if Werth moved back to left, & Young to right..it could work (def. one of the fastest outfields as well). That being said I don't think they will part ties with Madson, it will be someone like Condrey.
Posted by: Phillys Phinest | December 08, 2008 at 06:17 PM
If Werth were to move back to left...what about an Abreu reunion?
Posted by: Phillys Phinest | December 08, 2008 at 06:18 PM
If the price is a very good SS prospect and a top setup man, I'd hope Amaro would laugh that off and move on...
Posted by: wayne gomes | December 08, 2008 at 06:55 PM
Why would minnesota do Donald and Madson? Wouldn't they want someone they can control for longer? Madson has Boras for an agent and he'd want closer money and they've got Nathan until at least 2011.
Adding Condrey is silly, he has NO value.
I would say Donald and Happ. Ask for Carrasco and i slam down the phone
Posted by: philsWSchamps | December 08, 2008 at 07:28 PM
I'm really amazed by the people who still fawn over Delmon's "plus plus power potential." Seriously, take a long look at the numbers guys. Since being promoted to AAA midway through the 2005 season Young has hit exactly 40 HR in over 1900 AB. He has never, ever hit for power against high level pitching. I get that he is still just 23 and everything and I'm not completely writing off his power, but its been well over 3 seasons now since Young gave any indication of his power potential with his performance on the field.
Personally I think Delmon is probably only going to develop into a .300/.350/.450 type of player which is solid, but pretty unspectacular for a corner OF. Still, .300/.350/.500 doesn't seem unreasonable and there's always an outside shot he actually comes somewhat close to his projected ceiling. I'm not holding out any hope though.
Posted by: nixa37 | December 08, 2008 at 07:40 PM
what about a padres-twins trade for young...I'm sure they could both help each other out.
maybe kouz,meredith,and kazmar 4 young and a pitcher.
Posted by: Tha_SD-Brain | December 08, 2008 at 11:46 PM