![]() |
|
|
| |
« Marlins Sign Reliever Scott Proctor | Main | Giants Eyeing Crede »
10:28pm: Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle is skeptical about this rumor. His bottom line: "At some point the Giants could consider Ramirez under very specific financial conditions. However, their concessionaires should not order a large stock of dreadlock wigs for the souvenir stands just yet."
Jon Heyman has a new blog post on the topic; he says the Giants "could become the biggest threat to the Dodgers' hopes to retain Manny."
11:33am: According to Troy E. Renck of the Denver Post:
The Giants, the NL West's most active team this winter, are quietly making an aggressive play for free agent Manny Ramirez, according to a major-league source.
The Giants have been linked to Manny for months now; they apparently spoke with Scott Boras about him in November. It's interesting to see the Giants being aggressive while so many other teams are standing pat. Would Manny put them over the top? I imagine Brian Sabean would like to move Dave Roberts, Randy Winn, or Aaron Rowand to clear roster and payroll space.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536a14a32970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Giants Aggressively Pursuing Manny?:


|
|
Well Sabean was definitely quiet about it. I never saw this coming.
Posted by: bballrox4717 | January 01, 2009 at 11:35 AM
Greeeat, now Boras has someone for the dodgers to bid against.
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | January 01, 2009 at 11:37 AM
Wow, boy that would make the Giants competitive - then they could have someone play in the 8th and 9th for defense out in left field. Dont trade Aaron though. I can see them trading Winn or Roberts. I had a funny feeling the Giants might be a dark horse for Manny. They need a bat badly. It will be like Barry Bonds all over again and when Manny gets too old he can be a DH for an AL team again. Its a bold move, and not really a bad movie. If the Giants dealt with Barry, than they can deal with Manny. Could be interesting.
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 01, 2009 at 11:38 AM
The Giants probably wouldn't have too hard of a time trading Winn, but Roberts and Rowand are virtually untradeable, yes?
Posted by: tolo316 | January 01, 2009 at 11:48 AM
How much is winn and roberts making? Who would want them?
Posted by: NedCollettiClueless | January 01, 2009 at 11:50 AM
IMO its just Boras doing his thing. Just using teams to drive up the interest in his clients. He knows the Dodgers want him so he wants them to think the Giants ar interesting to drive up their pursuit. Sabean has repeatedly said he is not interested in Manny.
We don't have the money, space, or patience for Manny.
Posted by: lincecum4cy | January 01, 2009 at 11:50 AM
We can sign Manny to a 2-3 yr deal, he will be affordable for the Giants. They can trade Winn or Roberts. Id say Roberts because he is older and the Giants have Lewis for a base stealer
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 01, 2009 at 11:53 AM
That's right Giants raise the price for them Dodgers.
Posted by: kdub | January 01, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Just like they were aggressively pursuing Sabathia? I'll believe it when I see it.
Posted by: m26555 | January 01, 2009 at 11:54 AM
Like some people have already pointed out here, this might just be a ploy to drive up the price for the Dodgers.
Posted by: m26555 | January 01, 2009 at 11:56 AM
Anybody been watching what the Giants have been doing this year and what direction they are going? Get respectable now, win it in 2-3 years. kdub has it right, they are just trying to drive up the price. NO WAY do the Giants sign Ramirez.
Posted by: Gary D | January 01, 2009 at 12:03 PM
Whatever - I see this as the devil, Boras, creating a smoke screen to drive up the price. He's not going to San Fran.
Posted by: Suwanee | January 01, 2009 at 12:08 PM
the money it takes to sign Manny would be better used to fill several positions. Dunn and Crede and still have left over
Posted by: rfro | January 01, 2009 at 12:10 PM
What were the free agent statuses of Edgar Renteria, Howry, Johnson, and Affeldt.
I thought Affeldt and Johnson were type Bs, and Renteria and Howry were type As. But according to Keith Law, all of them are neither type A or B.
Posted by: OrangEandBlue | January 01, 2009 at 12:10 PM
Rowand and Roberts are quintessentially untradeable. The player who would move would be Winn.
Winn is actually a pretty good buy if you factor in defense. Giants can easily get a decent haul for Winn.
If the Giants get Manny, they're runaway favorites for the West. Simply because 1)they've upgraded big-time, in both the Manny signing and the spects they get for Winn and 2)the Dodgers can't get Manny.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 01, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Don't hyperventilate, SF fans. This is neither the first nor last shenanigan in this story. We're going to get the full arsenal of Boras tricks in the next week. Texas, Baltimore, both NY teams, even the unthinkable Red Sox rumor will surface. And then, yes, the Mystery Team's mysterious high bid will set the market to that inevitable midpoint between what Boras initially claimed he wanted for Manny and the figure that any other agent would have been able to get.
That's the whole Boras method. Pick an absurd figure, and then reduce it to a figure that is only a bit less absurd by comparison, and then dupe someone into bidding it. As long as there are two GMs willing to bite, it works. Looks like Scott's got his pawns lined up again.
Posted by: paxterj | January 01, 2009 at 12:12 PM
The only way the Giants get anything for Winn is if they eat his contract.
Posted by: OrangEandBlue | January 01, 2009 at 12:12 PM
LOL Waiting for Giants to pull rug out from underneath Boras, ala Angels/Mets. At any rate, if this is a valid SF pursuit at all, It'd be beneficial to NOT have the Dodgers "bidding against themselves" or any thing else that leave a bad taste in Manny's mouth if he didn't get at least the 2/45 original offer.
Posted by: abcrazy4dodgers | January 01, 2009 at 12:14 PM
With Man-NY in left, wouldn't the Giants want to keep a good glove guy in center like Rowand? I know he's a trade candidate simply because of his salary but still? Are there other competent in-house options in CF to replace Rowand? If yes, then what would be a good return on Rowand?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 01, 2009 at 12:15 PM
"I thought Affeldt and Johnson were type Bs, and Renteria and Howry were type As. But according to Keith Law, all of them are neither type A or B."
Affeldt was a Type B and was offered arbitration; Reds get a sandwich pick.
Johnson was a Type B, but he was not offered arbitration, so the DBacks get no compensation.
Howry and Renteria were both Type As, but neither were offered arbitration. Thus, the Giants lose no draft picks.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 01, 2009 at 12:15 PM
Winn of one of their better hitters, can play the outfield well enough, but I suspect that he might be the one who would be traded, if Manny becomes a Giant. One thing at a time.
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 01, 2009 at 12:17 PM
YFS78--
Rowand isn't nearly that much of a good-glove guy. Winn is more of a good glove guy.
The Giants shouldn't expect any sort of viable return on Rowand. Either a bad-contract for bad contract exchange or a trade in which the Giants get back nothing of value in return.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 01, 2009 at 12:17 PM
Just to screw up Boras i think Sabean should come out right now and repeatedly say he is in NO interest in Manny and make sure everyone hears that. He has already repeatedly said he isn't interested in Manny, but i guess he needs to do it again.
Posted by: lincecum4cy | January 01, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Might as well sign Bonds.
Posted by: Tahoe | January 01, 2009 at 12:19 PM
I put $20 on SF to win the NL after they sign RJ. I said they need a big bat, and bullpen help. Said they should have signed Fuentes though. They can't win without trading for some BP help.
Also put $20 on Cabrera and Manny to win HR derby.
Posted by: juiced | January 01, 2009 at 12:19 PM
Rowand is a great outfielder, didnt he win a gold glove or something. The Giants have Brian Wilson for a closer although Howry could do it.
The giants need a bat badly to contend and Manny would be good.
Posted by: TripleHHH | January 01, 2009 at 12:21 PM
Tim - I would imagine Winn actually has plus trade value, right? A .300 hitter that can give you decent defense (Actually...not sure about that one) with 10 HRs each season, the Cubs, Mets, White Sox, Yankees, etc could all be in on him, right?
Posted by: B3NG4L | January 01, 2009 at 12:23 PM
"Howry and Renteria were both Type As, but neither were offered arbitration. Thus, the Giants lose no draft picks."
-melonis rex
Law's free agent tracker on ESPN has neither of them listed a type A or B free agents.
Anyway, considering the Giants lost no type A or B free agents, and they already signed four, which already put them over the limit of signing three, if they sign Manny Ramirez, they would have signed 5 type A or B free agents this offseason.
The Giants are not playing by the rules.
Posted by: OrangEandBlue | January 01, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Might as well sign Bonds.
_____________________________
Could you imagine the Giants having Sandoval batting 3rd, Barry batting 4th and Man-NY 5th? WOW...
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 01, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Rowand has been doomed in SF ever since TLR put him up to the plate instead of Pujols in ASG bases loaded down by one bottom 9th situation. Whole world wanted Pujols up there. Argh, wtf? Rowand?! It's been argh ever since.
Posted by: paxterj | January 01, 2009 at 12:30 PM
Winn is at about 8M and Roberts, who has an untradable contract is making 6.5M. If Rowand could be traded who would play CF after 09? Winn to the WhiteSox to play CF?
Why not sign Manny? With the Giants pitching this team has a chance to be competitive for the West. Manny could make them alot more dangerous. Plus any chance to stick it to the Dodgers helps the Giants.
The Giants would have to give up only a 2nd rounder for Manny because the Dodgers offered arb and there 1st pick's protected.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | January 01, 2009 at 12:31 PM
If the Giants get Manny everyone would just pitch around him like they did Bonds. Who else in that lineup is going to step up?
Posted by: dgrfns | January 01, 2009 at 12:31 PM
OrangEandBlue
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/features/freeagents?season=2008
He's listed as B on ESPN's FA tracker.
And, I think only Type As and Bs offered arbitration count towards the quota. Just because other teams were stupid and/or couldn't afford the possibility of their guys accepting arbitration doesn't mean the Giants are breaking any rules.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 01, 2009 at 12:37 PM
I knew that something like this was in the works...and although he's getting older, a crappy defensive player, and would get pitched around. There is no question that Manny would make the Giants the team to beat out west.
Btw: Brian Wilson IS our closer next year. Howry and Affeldt are NOT, so all you people who are questioning that, just stop.
Posted by: Leland11 | January 01, 2009 at 12:41 PM
I would move Roberts. Winn is still really valuable to the Giants, and Roberts is quickly becoming a liability. Moving Winn to make room for Manny would be a mistake. I'd say the Giants are 50/50 about being serious about going for Manny.
Posted by: bballrox4717 | January 01, 2009 at 12:41 PM
"Tim - I would imagine Winn actually has plus trade value, right? A .300 hitter that can give you decent defense (Actually...not sure about that one) with 10 HRs each season, the Cubs, Mets, White Sox, Yankees, etc could all be in on him, right?"
Winn is a solid all around player with great D. He is very underrated.
Posted by: lincecum4cy | January 01, 2009 at 12:45 PM
if the giants get manny(and i really doubt it),,im sure either rowand or winn would be traded and fred lewis would more to center..but i highly doubt theres any real intrest in manny,besides the intrest of jacking up the price for the PUNK A@# dodgers(can u tell im a SF FAN? lol)..id love to move roberts but can any one honestly come up with a legit trade for em?
ohh and SPELL CHECK ALL THAT..i know i Kant Speel lol
Posted by: squigg510 | January 01, 2009 at 12:47 PM
Thanks Lincecum, I didn't know if his defense had faded over the year.
Posted by: B3NG4L | January 01, 2009 at 12:50 PM
Randy Winn and Sanchez
for
Encarnacion, Bailey, Stubbs
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | January 01, 2009 at 12:52 PM
""Tim - I would imagine Winn actually has plus trade value, right? A .300 hitter that can give you decent defense (Actually...not sure about that one) with 10 HRs each season, the Cubs, Mets, White Sox, Yankees, etc could all be in on him, right?""
Winn's defense is pretty good. He's not one of those bat-only types.
Cubs would make so much sense for Winn. Mitigates the crappy defense Soriano provides. As would White Sox (put Winn in CF).
Posted by: melonis rex | January 01, 2009 at 12:53 PM
The Giants gave Rowand a ridiculous contract. They're gonna have to eat a portion of it. That said: I do think he'll bounce back. I would think they'd give him another chance in CF.
They're stuck with Roberts.
Winn would be fine for the Braves, no? How many years left on his contract?
Posted by: drphonic7 | January 01, 2009 at 01:03 PM
bball
Winn only has 1 year left on his contract and I think they would have to free up some money for Manny. Winn would be missed at the top of the order, but I'd much rather have Manny than Winn. Plus Nate Schierholtz should be taking over RF.
Rowand has slipped but he's still better than anybody elsethis team has or is coming up from the minors. Rowand or Winn has to stay because Lewis can't play CF and Roberts=part time player. Plus with a Manny signing one outfielder has to be traded or cut.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | January 01, 2009 at 01:06 PM
some people are saying Rowand is "untradable," did you guys mean untouchable? because depending on the asking price the yankees would jump at rowand, and if Winn can play CF the yankees would jump at him too
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 01:13 PM
Well if the Giants do sign Man-NY, as opposed to the Yanks, how about Rowand (8/44 mil) for LF/RF Nady (1/5 mil, arb elig), SP-Igawa AAA (14-6, 3.45 whip 1.13)owed 3/12 mil, CF-Melky Cabrera and 1B-Juan Miranda (25/AAA/.287/.384 w/ 12hr, 52 rbis in 356 at bats)
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 01, 2009 at 01:18 PM
this is just a ploy from Boras the giants already said they have no interest in manny and why would Boras act like its a secret if the whole thing started in november boras would have told the world already so he could start a bidding war the giants arent going to get manny hes gonna sign with the dodgers
Posted by: dodgers1994 | January 01, 2009 at 01:19 PM
If Melky/Gardner aren't getting the job done in center by July then they'd call the Giants. Ask about Rowand, and if they want Melky, Nady, Miranda they'd most likely turn to Winn for 2 prospects as a stop gap in center field.
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 01:21 PM
How do you know the rumor came from Boras and not a legit source of the writer?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 01, 2009 at 01:22 PM
C Bengie Molina
FB Travis Ishikawa/John Bowker
SB Kevin Fransden/Eugenio Velez
TB Pablo Sandoval
SS Edgar Renteria/Emmanuel Burriss
LF Manny Ramirez
CF Aaron Rowand/Dave Roberts
RF Nate Schierholtz
SP1 Tim Lincecum
SP2 Matt Cain
SP3 Randy Johnson
SP4 Barry Zito
SP5 Jonathan Sanchez
CP1 Brian Wilson
SU1 Jeremy Affeldt
SU2 Bob Howry
Any Comments, Ideas, Concerns?
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 01, 2009 at 01:26 PM
For a moment there I wondered if Manny would have his price and value go down. As I see it the only teams interested are now the Dodgers and Giants. Still, with only two teams not including the Yankees a team has a chance to sign Manny for under his worth. Or at least to a short term 2-year deal.
I bring this up for one reason. If the price can go down on Manny a team like the Rangers could become interested. Manny would dominate in Arlington and fit well in the line-up (not necessarily in the locker room though). Put Manny in that line up and pray the Rangers can also sign Ben Sheets and thats the division wrapped up in a gift bag.
Sheets, Millwood, and Padilla
1. Kinsler
2. Young
3. Davis
4. Hamilton
5. Manny DH
6. Blalock
7. Cruz
8. Murphy
9. Salty/Teagarden
Thats a wow line up that produces enough to make even Millwood think about reaching 20 wins. Think about it though. Why not? A two-year contract that puts a line up out there that still has the defense (if Manny is DH) yet can out score anyone 5 times over.
Of course the Rangers would have to make a Manny move first before Sheets would want to come for sure. If I was a pitcher and saw that line up behind me I wouldn't be that concerned with ERA and instead think about how many games I could win.
Posted by: rangersvoice | January 01, 2009 at 01:27 PM
According to this, there are no FA limit rules this year because of the amount of players who filed(171).
http://baseball.suite101.com/article.cfm/baseball_free_agency_rules
Posted by: Shawn | January 01, 2009 at 01:30 PM
The only concern is there is a lot of young kids in the line up, i think there's 6 guys who dont have over 400 career ABs.
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 01:32 PM
Roberts has little trade value, he is due 6.5 million in 2009 and outside of sentimental value from his 2004 playoff heroics with that clutch SB vs the Yanks, can't even think of why Boston would want him as a 4th with him always hurt now and Drew is the resident DL outfielder on that team.. 1 is enough..
Isn't it interesting that when a real CF'ers name comes up that all of a sudden that Cabrera/Gardner are tossed aside for the Yankee future?
Posted by: johns | January 01, 2009 at 01:33 PM
Texas just had Milton Bradley for a season in their clubhouse, you think Manny is a worst clubhouse guy then bradley?
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 01:34 PM
Winn and Sanchez
for
Lowell, Lugo, and A minor League Pitcher
Red Sox need a 4th outfeilder which could be Winn...and the giants need a 3rd baseman...Mike Lowell
Red Sox sign Dunn and put him at first.
Posted by: Kulaid | January 01, 2009 at 01:35 PM
Manny to the Giants is an interesting thought. I'm not sure I believe Sabean is actually pursuing him but based off his past doings, Manny is exactly the kind of player Sabean likes to build a team around.
Unfortunately, if Manny were signed, it more likely than not would not be Dave Roberts traded. As badly as everyone wants him gone, he simply has very little trade value. Combine that with his contract and the Giants would have to find a team looking to dump an equally bad contract of a player with very little use. Probably a washed up 5th starter type who is now stuck in long relief. Honestly, with only one year left on his deal, unless the Giants find a match with another 1 year deal, they might as well not commit more in a Roberts trade.
That leaves Winn and Rowand. Simply due to Rowand's NTC and his contract of 4/42 still owed, that leaves Randy Winn as the most likely trade candidate. Winn does have a lot of value in the league. 1 year left, strong right field defense, can play center if needed, consisently hits for average, average pop in most parks, quiet leader, has speed, potential leadoff hitter.
While I think this is a scare tactic for the Dodgers, Manny is the one player left on the FA market that could put the Giants over the top heading into this season. For that reason, along with Bill Neukom's desire to win now, I can see this happening.
As for the too many typed FA signings, Melonis Rex had it correct. Howdy and Renteria were Type A FA but were not offered arbitration, they then became unclassified. Johnson was a type B FA but was not offered arb, and also became unclassified. Affeldt was a type B and signed before the Arb deadline so was offered Arb and they get a Sandwich pick. Unclassified FA signings have no bearing on how many Typed FA teams can sign so technically the Giants have only signed 1 and may still sign 2 more.
Also, please stop offering Edwin Encarnacion in trade proposals. No one here wants him including Brian Sabean as he has said on numerous times
Posted by: Nuschler's News | January 01, 2009 at 01:35 PM
YanksFanSince78...
The trade proposal you made of Melky, Nady, Miranda, and Igawa for Rowand doesn't make much sense to me as the Yankees would be giving up on a young outfielder with potential in Melky Cabrera, an outfielder who could net them a bounty of prospects in Xavier Nady, a former slugger in Cuba who showed flashes here in the US in Juan Miranda, and an expensive number 5 NL starter at best in Igawa (who the Giants wouldn't want due to money situations)just for Aaron Rowand? A guy who hit only 13 hrs last year? I dont think the Yankees would want that type of player although he does play great defensively. considering they would have to give up so much according to your deal i think they best stand pat than make a move for him. If it were a deal similar to what we were going to give up for Mike Cameron, say Melky Cabrera and Kei Igawa plus something small, i would do it instantly but to give up on Juan Miranda and Xavier Nady like that just doesn't make sense to me and i doubt Cashman would even consider doing it.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 01, 2009 at 01:36 PM
johns- No body is tossing Cabrera/Gardner aside. But if they arent getting the job done, getting Winn for a season and letting them develop more is not the worst idea in the world.
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 01:37 PM
Reffrenced article: "The Giants, the NL West's most active team this winter, are quietly making an aggressive play for free agent Manny Ramirez, according to a major-league source."
Waving the BS Flag now---Out of market writer citing the un-named source.
Kthnxbai.
Posted by: abcrazy4dodgers | January 01, 2009 at 01:37 PM
Move youk to Third
Posted by: Kulaid | January 01, 2009 at 01:37 PM
I don't see a link to the actual story. It would be nice to see if the comments were taken out of context.
Posted by: A | January 01, 2009 at 01:38 PM
http://www.denverpost.com/rockies/ci_11348258
(or where it has writers name at lead of Tim's article)
Posted by: abcrazy4dodgers | January 01, 2009 at 01:39 PM
"Winn and Sanchez for
Lowell, Lugo, and A minor League Pitcher"
why dont you throw lincecum in that package while you're at it??
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 01:40 PM
GmblngPtchr20
Edwin Encarnacion is not going to be a San Francisco Giant in 2009. The deal with the Red Sox does make sense though.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 01, 2009 at 01:41 PM
Ahhhhhh...Mr. John S. Hatertude. I wondered where you were? Happy New Year. No, the whole re-building isn't being tossed out. The Yanks are set to lose several OF's next year to FA (Damon, Nady, Matsui). If they were to make this deal then Gardner becomes the 4th OF with a mix like (Matsui DH, Damon LF, ROwand CF and Swisher RF). After 09 Rowand, Gardner and Austin Jackson become the base of restructuring the OF. I still feel Gardner can be a good CF/leadoff guy, but he still has to prove it. So does Ajax. Rowand and Swisher can be good building blocks. If Gardner or Ajax prove themselves you can slide one of the three to LF.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 01, 2009 at 01:41 PM
*A deal with the Red Sox* not the Reds...
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 01, 2009 at 01:42 PM
why would Boras keep this a secret when his whole purpose with manny to is tom make a bidding war. the giants said they dont want manny already
Posted by: dodgers1994 | January 01, 2009 at 01:48 PM
YanksFanSince78:
I just dont like the sound of an outfield in 2010 with Rowand, Swisher, and Ajax. I personally think AJax is going to be a stud but he hasn't proven anything yet and by 2010 we will still be speculating about him as much as we are now because i dont think he will see that much MLB playing time in 09. Rowand while great defensively is a solid outfielder and i would welcome him to the Yankees, but if the asking price isn't as steep as you first suggested. And right now to me Nick Swisher is the worst hitting player in all of baseball until he can prove otherwise this season. So going into 2010 with an outfield of Rowand, Ajax, and Swisher just doesnt cut it for me based on those reasons.
Posted by: Rolling{Night}Hawk{09} | January 01, 2009 at 01:48 PM
I like this either way, drive the price up for the Dodgers, or take the best player on the market for practically 1/3 the price he was trying to go for.
Posted by: kuyote | January 01, 2009 at 01:50 PM
I really don't know who would be worse Milton or Manny?
But again I said it wouldn't matter because the Rangers would have their way with teams using that line up...
Posted by: rangersvoice | January 01, 2009 at 01:51 PM
Zack,
The kids are going play. This team has to go young, but still try to be competitive to keep butt's in the seats.
Rolling
I'd like to see Burriss at 2B next year. I think he'll be better than Fradsen and my 9 year old has a better baseball IQ than Velez.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | January 01, 2009 at 01:52 PM
and unless mccourt is stubbern we will get manny cause he makes the team
Posted by: dodgers1994 | January 01, 2009 at 01:54 PM
YanksFanSince78...
The trade proposal you made of Melky, Nady, Miranda, and Igawa for Rowand doesn't make much sense to me as the Yankees would be giving up on a young outfielder with potential in Melky Cabrera, an outfielder who could net them a bounty of prospects in Xavier Nady, a former slugger in Cuba who showed flashes here in the US in Juan Miranda, and an expensive number 5 NL starter at best in Igawa (who the Giants wouldn't want due to money situations)just for Aaron Rowand? A guy who hit only 13 hrs last year? I dont think the Yankees would want that type of player although he does play great defensively. considering they would have to give up so much according to your deal i think they best stand pat than make a move for him. If it were a deal similar to what we were going to give up for Mike Cameron, say Melky Cabrera and Kei Igawa plus something small, i would do it instantly but to give up on Juan Miranda and Xavier Nady like that just doesn't make sense to me and i doubt Cashman would even consider doing it.
__________________________
Juan Miranda might become a good hitter one day but it won't be w/ the Yanks. Teixeira basically killed any idea of that and I can't see him being the DH either with Matsui there this year and possibly Posada being there next year. Plus there are much better proven DH types available next year. Melky is my boy and I have no problem going with a Melky/Gardner combo but I do think Rowand is a better upgrade over him and a better option, IMO, than Cameron. And he wouldn't neccesarily block Gardner from getting 400 at-bats next year. Igawa's is simply a dump for us. The Yanks are taking on Rowand's 44 mil owed and giving SF about 20 mil after arb increases. He probably wouldn't even make the SF staff unless a couple of guys went down, but who knows maybe the change of scenery and a switch to the NL might help him?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 01, 2009 at 01:57 PM
No I understand they need to be young, the guy asked if there were any concerns and that's a major one.
As for Nick Swisher, its tough to believe that at 28 he's washed up. If he can get back to .250, hit 25-35hr, and have a OBP over .370 he'd be a good coner outfielder again. But there's a whole season before 2010 so focus on this year
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 01:57 PM
Swisher might be on the way down if pitchers have figured out the holes in his swing. Not every player's career ends in old age or injuries.
Posted by: paxterj | January 01, 2009 at 02:06 PM
Keep in mind rolling that 2010 is still a long way from now. I simply meant that Rowand, Swisher, Gardner and Austin Jackson is a good starting point, not what we should roll with. The 2009 season performances by most of those guys will go along way from seperating the field. As much as I like Gardner, he still has to earn his keep, same with Melky if he stays. Swisher has to prove 08 was just a bad "fluke" and Austin Jackson, despite being a 5 tool guy, has a lot of hype around him and has never hit above the AA level. He's still young @ 22 (Feb) but no need in rushing him. Too many overhyped guys have "real potential" but are rushed to the majors, struggle, lose confidence, and then become reclamation projects. I'd rather have a proven guy like Rowand around to ease the transition in case he shows signs he might need another year. If he's ready by 2011 at age 24 then I'm cool with that.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 01, 2009 at 02:07 PM
Zack I agree. As a Giants fan I'm excited to see what the kids can do.
Winn's contract calls for limited no-trade clause 2008-09 (Winn may block deals to 10 clubs. Got this from Cott's. Anybody know how to find out which teams?
Posted by: WillieMaysField | January 01, 2009 at 02:09 PM
Swisher improved from '05 to '06 to '07. he was unlucky with his BABIP at .250, he had a down year at 28
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 02:12 PM
i think the 'no trade list' is private with the club, unless it is leaked.
rowand had a NTC for '08, but the rest of his contract is just limited
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 02:14 PM
Willie- Typically the Limited NTC are private between the club and player. They are set upon the contract being signed but are flexible. Meaning the player usually can change the teams on the clause when ever he wants to. That usually happens for 2 reasons. 1- player hears a rumor and doesn't want to go there. 2- A player hears a rumor and may want to go there, so by makig that team a part of his NTC, the teams usually have to offer more money to him to get him to allow the trade.
Posted by: Nuschler's News | January 01, 2009 at 02:20 PM
i dont think he can change it whenever he wants because it would basically be a full no trade clause, right?
Posted by: Zack | January 01, 2009 at 02:24 PM
Thanks guys!!! I can see why both the club and player would want the limited-notrade to be private.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | January 01, 2009 at 02:28 PM
There's been no reason for other fans to pay attention to the Giants, so here's tiny primer:
The Giants signed Rowand to a big free agent contract...he is their centerfielder. He had an off year with the bat in 2008. There's not the slightest hint from anybody in the organization that they'd trade him or even consider using somebody like Roberts in some sort of platoon. It doesn't matter whether they overpaid to get Rowand...he's the centerfielder. They aren't trying to trade him to make room for Ramirez or anything.
Winn's a professional ... he hit over .300 and drove in runs in a really really weak lineup in '08. People who mention him and Roberts in the same breath, as though they're the same type player, haven't followed Winn's career. He was often the only true big leaguer in the lineup in '08. They'd trade him, but...why? It's hitters they need and he's a hitter. His contract is too big to make him marketable to start with.
The Giants are stuck with Roberts and he's stuck behind, unproven outfielders like Nate Schierholtz. Fred Lewis is the everyday leftfielder. Sabean says Lewis is their guy because he can hit at the top of the order or in the middle. Roberts is a guy who could get his outright release if younger guys play well.
Oh...Lewis is really fast, but he's not at all a base-stealer. He gets a terrible jump ... gets picked off. And, while he's the leftfielder on my favorite team...he's also a weak defender. Other than that...he's got physical tools and he looks good in a uniform.
The idea of spending Ramirez-type monoey on Dunn and Crede particularly doesn't make sense. Dunn's a lefthand power hitter who would likely view cavernous AT&T Park as the last place he'd want to play 81 games. I believe his batting average in SF shows he just doesn't hit here. The Giants made an attempt to get Crede last winter when he was coming off the back injury. They passed and, really, they figure that they're OK with Sandoval at third and some platoon at first base. (Sandoval's a hitter who should be a catcher or at first base, but the Giants have to believe until they see if their second 2008 first-round draft pick Conor Gillespie's going to become a big leaguer.)
Everything the Giants do now to the lineup is done with their belief that Buster Posey's going to make it to the big leagues very quickly. He was their first No. 1 in 2008...he's a catcher...he could, I think, play a corner infield spot if they decided to keep Molina behind the plate for a year or something once Posey's in the big leagues. Sabean sounds like they count on Posey making it to the big leagues this year. So...don't just list the anticipated everyday lineup...put Posey at the top of the lineup with a question mark as his position...then list a lineup...that's what the Giants are looking at as we wonder if they'd really sign Ramirez.
Sabean says he expects the free agent field to develop late and offer "bargains" like, as the San Francisco Chronicle's Henry Schulman pointed out Wednesday, they got in Reggie Sanders and David Bell in the spring of 2002. They signed them around spring training time for very affordable deals.
So...this market's making it a lot harder for Dunn, Pat Burrell, Bobby Abreu and even Ramirez to get anywhere near the cash or the years they expected. So...sure...the Giants would sign Ramirez if he becomes what they consider a bargain given his overall value.
It's silly to say, "The Giants would NEVER sign Ramirez," because...the NL West's weak and a hitter could put them over the top. And, don't forget, these are tough economic times and folks aren't going to flock to AT&T Park just to soak the ambience by the bay to watch a 75-win team...ownership must realize they need to win games to attract fans in between Lincecum's starts...and Randy Johnson's starts as he chases those five wins to get to No. 300.
Oh...and...yeah...Brian Wilson's not only THE closer..he was on the NL All-Star team.
It's a commentary on the state of the Giants that people across the country have had no reason to pay the slightest attention to them.
But...one sentence at the end of a notes column in the Denver Post about Ramirez gets them national attention.
Posted by: T Sill | January 01, 2009 at 02:29 PM
Manny would be great in a Giants uniform when they start losing games he will just turn on the off switch and give up like he did in Boston.
Posted by: Jon | January 01, 2009 at 02:40 PM
"he's a catcher...he could, I think, play a corner infield spot if they decided to keep Molina behind the plate for a year or something once Posey's in the big leagues."
While I agree, he could easily move from behind the dish (played SS even before he moved to catcher), I'd think if he makes it to the majors, Molina is gone, or I guess Molina is the one to move (1B? terrifying to imagine him trying to man the field). With Posey not being a catcher for long, I'd think the Giants want him to get as much action there as possible.
Posted by: CubbyFan23 | January 01, 2009 at 02:47 PM
WillieMaysField:
If I remember correctly, Winn's NTC applies to either the NL or AL Central teams; I can't remember which league.
T Sill:
You are correct on almost all counts, except I do remember reading several press accounts before the GM's meeting that the Giants were contacted by 1-2 teams about Rowand's availability (it was assumed by some that the Yankees and White Sox were those teams). It isn't far-fetched that Rowand could be shopped and sent to the right team, but it also affects what they do with Winn, because signing Manny (assuming it's for LF - which is not a sure thing) requires them to have a top-flight defender in CF, and that means Winn, not Rowand, because Rowand had a hard time in 2008 adjusting to Mays Field.
Sabean did say the softening FA market allowed for some late bargains, yet few thought he may have meant Manny. I don't think it is far-fetched at all for the Giants to make a run at Manny, because: 1) Neukom needs to fill seats until the young talent shows up in 2011; and 2) making a play for Manny either allows them to get a bargain or drive up the price for the Dodgers.
Posted by: Buck Henry | January 01, 2009 at 02:50 PM
This move doesn't happen. Manny is not coming to the Giants because they aren't going to pay him $22M a year. One little blurb in the Denver Post from a "Major League Source". Come on. Sounds like that major league source is Boras. Even the Dodgers who have lost everybody won't give Manny more than 2 years. Boras wants a longer contract for Manny. Total smoke screen
Posted by: Kfer | January 01, 2009 at 02:51 PM
So if Posey moves from C what will his ultimate destination be? 1B? Where would Sandoval be? 3B?
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 01, 2009 at 02:53 PM
That Lowell/Lugo/minor leaguer for Sanchez/Winn deal is insane. Where would Lugo play, exactly? Why would the Giants take on his contract? Why would they give up Sanchez for one year of a banged-up Lowell? Why?
If the Giants traded for Lowell, it'd be for someone like Kevin Pucetas. They're not giving up Sanchez that easily.
Posted by: DT79 | January 01, 2009 at 02:54 PM
Resign Barry Bonds. Come on Sabean you know you want to add another old person to your team.
Posted by: Will Smiff | January 01, 2009 at 02:55 PM
Manny for 2 years, would lock up the division.
Dodgers look to be our only competition this year and without Manny they'd return to mediocre status.
Getting Manny is going to force us to trade a Winn, Lewis or Scherholtz.
Ideally I'd like to keep Lewis and move him to RF.
Winn is a great player, but I'd take Lewis and Manny over him anyday.
Manny would hold back Scherholtz, but the guy is still fairly young and would get a handful of ABs off the bench as a defensive replacement for Manny, PHer, injury sub.
Other than Nate, he wouldn't be blocking any of our top position prospects over the next couple seasons.
The Roberts problem will work itself out.
Might as well give it a shot.
If the Phillies could come out of no where and win the Series then why not a Giants team with better pitching and Manny??
Posted by: Ohan | January 01, 2009 at 03:05 PM
this would defiantly put them at the top of the nl west hopefully they can get rid of rowand to make room.
Posted by: SFgiants55 | January 01, 2009 at 03:10 PM
Kfer, agreed that "major league source" could easily be Boras, so I will wait eagerly for Sabean to issue a flat denial of this story . . . but paying Manny $20-22 million a year for two years to fill the seats, after they move some salary through a Rowand move ($12 million offset) isn't as far-fetched as it may have seemed weeks ago.
Posted by: Buck Henry | January 01, 2009 at 03:11 PM
T Sill
I do agree with you on Winn. He's my son's favorite Giant, class act, and he does everything well. What if the Giants sign Manny and keep Winn. It would put the payroll at about 105m (Manny 20-25m). Which is about 15M more than 2007.
C Bengie Molina
1B Travis Ishikawa/John Bowker
2B Emmanuel Burriss
3B Pablo Sandoval
SS Edgar Renteria
LF Manny Ramirez
CF Aaron Rowand
RF Randy Winn/Nate Schierholtz
SP1 Tim Lincecum
SP2 Randy Johnson
SP3 Matt Cain
SP4 Barry Zito
SP5 Jonathan Sanchez
CP1 Brian Wilson
SU1 Jeremy Affeldt
SU2 Romo
SU3 Howry
This could be middle of the pack in runs scored in the NL. Lewis or Roberts have to be cut/traded. Nate Schierholtz would get most of the abats as a lefty hitter off the bench and then take over in RF 2010 when Winn's and Robert's contracts come off the books.
YanksFan
I know Sabean has stated the goal is Posey at C but the guy did play all 9 position in game at Florida State he is muti-talented. Exstend Molina and put Posey at 3B and Sandoval at 1B. Don't kill me guys just a thought.
Posted by: WillieMaysField | January 01, 2009 at 03:12 PM
Buck,
I truely don't think they will move Rowand via trade. He seems to be the only clubhouse stability, despite his subpar season at the plate. Bengie and Win will be gone next year or possibly at the trade deadline, so you would be relying on Manny as the veteren presence in the clubhouse. Don't see it happening. I wouldn't mind Manny, especially if it takes him out of the hands of the Dodgers, but this guy is holding out for his last big contract. Someone will give it to him and I don't think its a great move for the Giants.
Posted by: Kfer | January 01, 2009 at 03:15 PM
I can't see Manny in a Giants Uniform, Pretty sure there just raising the big on Manny and he'll end up a Dodger.
Posted by: K-ace | January 01, 2009 at 03:21 PM
Hi have a trade that might help both teams,Giants send either Roland/ or Winn with Jack Tascher and John Bowker to the Yankees for Swisher/or Nady and Robinson Cano. Yhe Yankees would have a CF a good LH reliever, and with Bowker a good utility 1b outfielder, the giants could put either Nady or Swisher at 1b, Cano at 2nd base,any thoughts
Posted by: bobbybonds254 | January 01, 2009 at 03:25 PM
You know what. I've been pondering this "Manny" thing. If they get him, it will really protect some of the young hitters in the lineup, meaning they will see more fastballs. If you surround Manny:
1.Burris 2nd
2.Renteria ss
3.Sandoval 3rd
4.Manny Lf
5.Lewis/Winn Rf
6.Rowand Cf
7.Molina C
8.Ishikawa/Scherholtz/Bowker 1st
This might work. Kids sandwiched in between some professional hitters would let them grow a bit. Let me pose this question for you Giants fans though. Keep Manny in the rearview mirror and make a run at Burrell when his price hits rock bottom. He played a lot of 1st at Bellermine and Cal and he could platoon between the 1st and LF. Granted, he's no Manny, but he's a local guy and from all accounts is gonna be realtively cheap.
Posted by: Kfer | January 01, 2009 at 03:29 PM
It's too bad, leave it to Sabean to stand in the way of justice. I'd hate to see Manny get what he wants, it'd just reinforce his behavior. Next thing you know every punk in baseball quits on his team in order to get a better contract. Maybe it won't get that bad, but once is enough.
Posted by: pageian | January 01, 2009 at 03:30 PM
Kfer, a move by the Giants for Manny, which I agree is speculative at best, may mean also that Winn and Molina would be extended for 2010. Manny in LF would require Winn for CF rather than Rowand given his range and defensive advantages over Rowand. And at this point, I think Sabean may be leaning towards an extension for Molina as well to take them to 2011 and Posey, rather than moving Pablo to another position after 2009.
Assuming there's anything to this story (which, again, could be nothing more than Boras working a reporter), the thinking may be to build a short-term veteran nucleus around Manny to compete in a weak division for the next two years, and fill the seats, until the farm system generates all that cheap talent in 2011 and beyond (Posey, Bumgarner, Alderson, Crawford, Gillaspie, Noonan, Sosa, and Pucetas.)
Posted by: Buck Henry | January 01, 2009 at 03:32 PM
"Swisher improved from '05 to '06 to '07. he was unlucky with his BABIP at .250, he had a down year at 28"
Swisher is probably THE most valuable utility guy in the game at this moment as long as the Yankees can get him enough AB's rotating him from corner OF spots, 1B and DH to keep him happy, the guy is good enough to start for an awful lot of teams and the Yank's will miss him dearly if/WHEN Matusi and/or Damon go down with an injury. I agree fully and think that his 2008 was just a porr season and he'll bounce back fully with a 350+ AB season which they should be able to provide him with, he's just too good of a hitter and don't buy into that 'full of holes swing" since not all pitchers do not have that kind of control.
That was a pretty hilarious trade proposal involving Lugo and Lowell plus that infamous "minor league pitcher" we all love to read about here.. As far as to where Lugo would play for the Giants (or anywhere else for that matter) maybe some AAA team would be my suggestion.
Posted by: johns | January 01, 2009 at 03:34 PM