![]() |
|
|
| |
« Latest On Pedro Martinez | Main | Rosenthal On Fielder, Buchholz, Edmonds »
FRIDAY: Ken Davidoff of Newsday says Yankees GM Brian Cashman has received more requests for Swisher than Nady, but agrees the Yanks would prefer to move Nady. (Chris Haft likes Swisher for the Giants). Davidoff says the Mets had interest in Nady at last year's trade deadline but are currently focused on their rotation.
THURSDAY: Henry Schulman of the San Francisco Chronicle heard from a good source that Yankees GM Brian Cashman wants to keep Nick Swisher and trade Xavier Nady. Would Nady make sense for the Giants at first base? Schulman doesn't think so, as the Nady hasn't played the position much and is unlikely to sign an extension with Scott Boras as his agent. Nady will be eligible for free agency after the '09 season.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010536be603b970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Yankees Want To Trade Nady:


|
|
mets?
Posted by: metsfan23 | January 08, 2009 at 04:17 PM
i know the marlins were interested last year, but ill never happen. unlike they love hermida(not possible)
what are the yankees looking for?
Posted by: marlinsman1120 | January 08, 2009 at 04:20 PM
reds?
Posted by: bseballcrzy17 | January 08, 2009 at 04:20 PM
Marlins for a young pitcher like Sanchez + a prospect?
Posted by: B.K. | January 08, 2009 at 04:20 PM
Good. He's the one they need to trade. Move the career-average corner OFer as he comes off a career year and hope for big things from Swish.
Posted by: cdg02001 | January 08, 2009 at 04:21 PM
whats his line? could he be a dodger if we miss manny, what would it take?
Posted by: lakersdodgersyankees4life | January 08, 2009 at 04:21 PM
Nady seems to make sense for the Reds. I don't think that they would would have to give up too much to acquire him due to the fact that he'll be a free agent in 2009. He should at least be an effective stopgap in LF even if the Reds choose not to extend him.
Posted by: AlphaZero | January 08, 2009 at 04:22 PM
Oops, I meant to write "due to the fact that he'll be a free agent AFTER 2009."
Posted by: AlphaZero | January 08, 2009 at 04:24 PM
I call BS on this one. Why would the Yankees trade a guy in his contract year...especially a Boras client? Plus, Swisher has a crappy contract and is better as a 1B than an OF. Plus, the fact that Nady just had his best year and Swisher had his worst...it just doesn't make sense.
Posted by: Ralow | January 08, 2009 at 04:25 PM
I would not give Yankees anything on a one year rental.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 08, 2009 at 04:27 PM
They should try really hardly to get Homer Bailey from the Reds in exchange for Xavier Nady...
Posted by: mikelovesbaseball94 | January 08, 2009 at 04:27 PM
Possible idea: Hughes, Nady and maybe Humberto Sanchez or Veras to the Pads for Peavy? Hughes can join the rotation, Veras or Sanchez could close for Hoffman and nady could take RF. Yankees would have the best rotation in baseball: CC, Peavy, AJ, Wang and Joba.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:27 PM
I watch swish all last year, as a Sox fan, not good.
Posted by: rockford | January 08, 2009 at 04:28 PM
San Diego only wants prospects. And they better be the best you have.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 08, 2009 at 04:30 PM
The only sense I can make out of this is if the Yankees were looking to get young bullpen help. I think Nady has a higher trade value but I really hope he stays with this team.
Posted by: John Ginder | January 08, 2009 at 04:30 PM
How many times must it be written or said that the Giants are not interested in trading for someone who only has one year left on their contract?
Posted by: kdub | January 08, 2009 at 04:31 PM
jjyankeesfan2
this is coming from a yankee fan by the way
the padres are dumping salary- and they have brian giles already- so no nady
plus they wouldnt want a player entering their walk year
thats not nearly enough for the padres to accept
Posted by: hawkeyes12990 | January 08, 2009 at 04:31 PM
There's still so many free agents, I'm not sure how much of a market there is for Nady right now.
I wonder if the Yankees will need to wait a while for the FA market to come to a conclusion before trading him.
Posted by: cowsarecool220 | January 08, 2009 at 04:33 PM
BK,
anibal sanchez and a prospect for nady?
done, i do that
Posted by: marlinsman1120 | January 08, 2009 at 04:34 PM
Hughes, Kennedy,Sanchez, probably just a start for Peavy.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 08, 2009 at 04:35 PM
"San Diego only wants prospects. And they better be the best you have".
Hughes IS the best prospect they have that's ML ready and Sanchez throws in the upper 90's.
"The only sense I can make out of this is if the Yankees were looking to get young bullpen help. I think Nady has a higher trade value but I really hope he stays with this team".
Yankees have endless amounts of young bullpen help. That's the best part of their farm system. After Mo they can choose from Bruney, Veras, Melancon, Coke, Ramirez, Sanchez, Albaladejo, Robertson, DeLaRosa, etc etc
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:35 PM
I hope the yankees keep Nady, trade Swisher and melky to someone.
Posted by: yanks12025 | January 08, 2009 at 04:36 PM
It makes perfect sense because the thought is that Swisher's poor performance was a fluke and they expect him to rebound. Also, Swisher is a capable corner OF but not so much in CF. Nady, while I think he's a good player, still has to prove last year wasn't a "fluke" career year. Under normal circumstances I think the Yanks would entertain extending him but because of his agent it's not going to happen.
This is the most clear example of how having such a "heavy handed" agent like Boras might work against you. ANy team that trades for him will do w/ the thought that they'll only have him for 1 year. If he has a great 2009 you can expect Boras to start floating numbers like 5/60 mil for him and considering how he'll have other big clients on the market next year like (Holliday, Ordonez, Ankiel, Damon, Beltre and Jones) you can be sure he will drag out a signing as long as possible until the bigger marquee names have set the market value.
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 08, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Forgot to say, You guys watch the yankees trade two outfielders so they can sign Manny.
Posted by: yanks12025 | January 08, 2009 at 04:37 PM
Can I ask someone why would you think Nady has a high trade value?
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 08, 2009 at 04:38 PM
I seriously wonder what the Yankees would be looking for. A young outfield prospect maybe? Package Nady with Kennedy/Aceves and try to get a top level corner outfield prospect? The Braves apparently had a lot of interest in Swish before he was traded to the Yankees. They are desperately seeking some outfield help why not try to package Swish with Kennedy and another prospect for Heyward.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 04:40 PM
I would imagine you would be looking at a similar return to the one Hendry landed for DeRosa. If Nady brings back much more, then someone will need to flog Jim Hendry.
Posted by: jrfukudome | January 08, 2009 at 04:40 PM
Cy - He hit .305 25 97 last year and is on a one year highly-reasonable deal. If you need performance and don't want to shell out a mult-year in this econ...he's a good value.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:40 PM
I can't imagine anyone giving up a lot for Xavier Nady.
Posted by: Will Smiff | January 08, 2009 at 04:40 PM
I don't see any way that the Yankees can get any more for Nady than the Cubs got for DeRosa. Which makes me wonder why they would bother trading him.
Posted by: James F | January 08, 2009 at 04:42 PM
Well, good luck waiting for Swisher to prove last year wasn't a fluke. I'd rather take my chances with the guy entering his walk year than the guy with $20M+ guaranteed for 2 more years & coming off a .220 season.
Honestly, I think the Yankees keep both of them...Swisher would be a great bench player filling in at OF and DH and possibly 1B. Starting RF? Not so much.
Posted by: Ralow | January 08, 2009 at 04:42 PM
"Possible idea: Hughes, Nady and maybe Humberto Sanchez or Veras to the Pads for Peavy? Hughes can join the rotation, Veras or Sanchez could close for Hoffman and nady could take RF. Yankees would have the best rotation in baseball: CC, Peavy, AJ, Wang and Joba."
Impossible. Hoffman is on the Brewers roster.
Posted by: Beer n Baseball | January 08, 2009 at 04:42 PM
I think between Swisher and Nady he has a higher trade value.
Posted by: John Ginder | January 08, 2009 at 04:42 PM
I am not sayong he is not good, but his trade value to 29 other GM'S who see him leaving in one year does not make him something to give the Yankees to much in prospects, yes.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 08, 2009 at 04:43 PM
"Yankees Get:
Homer Bailey SP
Drew Stubbs OF
Reds Get:
Xavier Nady OF
Cash (eat his contract)
Then the Yankees turn around and offer the Royals a package invlolvng Zack Grienke and David DeJesus...
Yakees Get:
Zack Grienke SP
David DeJesusOF
Royals Get:
Drew Stubbs OF
Homer Bailey SP
Ian Kennedy SP
Nick Swisher 1B
Melky Cabrera OF
Phil Coke SP"
Posted by: mikelovesbaseball94 | January 08, 2009 at 04:43 PM
They should keep ALL the OF's. Matsui is the DH, Gardner in CF, Nady in RF, Swish backing up all three and 1b. Injuries are part of the game and Swish could be the first REAL bat the Yankees have had off the bench in some time. If mid-year everyone in the OF is healthy but there is another injury or glaring need, use one of the OF's in a trade THEN.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:43 PM
Cyyoung.....I really don't think Nady has high trade value right now. I'm sure a couple of mid level prospects could get it done but why would the Yankees want to trade him for that? His value to the Yankees as their right fielder is higher than as a trading chip in my mind. But the rumors are all over the place (I don't know if its just media speculation) so teams must be offering something of value to get him. If they trade him for a couple guy who MIGHT be able to be a less than horrible relief pitcher in 3 years though I would be pissed. I don't think he is as good as his numbers last year but I think he could easily hit .280 25 HR's with 80-100 RBI's.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 04:44 PM
With Rocco Baldelli signing with the Red Sox today, the Reds will be the best fit for Nady. Although I hope they don't give up to much for him. He will most likely be a one year player with them.
Posted by: dphill314 | January 08, 2009 at 04:44 PM
I dont think the yankees are going to sign manny although i think he would be awesome.... i think they are going to wait for halliday next year... as for nady i think its negotiating tactics
Posted by: cary | January 08, 2009 at 04:45 PM
"Possible idea: Hughes, Nady and maybe Humberto Sanchez or Veras to the Pads for Peavy? Hughes can join the rotation, Veras or Sanchez could close for Hoffman and nady could take RF. Yankees would have the best rotation in baseball: CC, Peavy, AJ, Wang and Joba."
Impossible. Hoffman is on the Brewers roster
UMMM....that's why I said that Sanchez or Veras could close FOR Hoffman...because he's not there anymore.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:45 PM
"They should keep ALL the OF's. Matsui is the DH, Gardner in CF, Nady in RF, Swish backing up all three and 1b. Injuries are part of the game and Swish could be the first REAL bat the Yankees have had off the bench in some time. If mid-year everyone in the OF is healthy but there is another injury or glaring need, use one of the OF's in a trade THEN."
I totally agree with this. Most likely, Cashman does too...which is why this SF article is BS. Lets not forget that we traded Wilson Betemit for Swisher...
Posted by: Ralow | January 08, 2009 at 04:47 PM
Again I am a Sox fan and believe I think Nady is a very good ball player not denying you that. But if I was a GM I would not give you top prospects for him, knowing he might not return to my team. If he was signed long term or at least 2 more years, then his value would be up.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 08, 2009 at 04:47 PM
"Yankees Get:
Homer Bailey SP
Drew Stubbs OF
Reds Get:
Xavier Nady OF
Cash (eat his contract)
Then the Yankees turn around and offer the Royals a package invlolvng Zack Grienke and David DeJesus...
Yakees Get:
Zack Grienke SP
David DeJesusOF
Royals Get:
Drew Stubbs OF
Homer Bailey SP
Ian Kennedy SP
Nick Swisher 1B
Melky Cabrera OF
Phil Coke SP"
I just threw up
Posted by: Beer n Baseball | January 08, 2009 at 04:47 PM
I have wished all along the Yankees got in on the Peavy trade talks.
Maybe there is some type of package they could offer that is better than what we have read about.
Posted by: John Ginder | January 08, 2009 at 04:47 PM
I dont understand teams need to get rid of Xavier Nady. He seems to get better and better every year. Every team that lets him go is kicking themselves right now. I sure hope the Yankees keep Nady and get rid of Swisher. Getting Swisher in a trade was smart but realize his low potential compared to Nady. Makes no sense to trade away the better of the two. Get rid of the guy with 2/20 left on his contract. If Nady doesnt work out (which he will) the Yankees can just let him go on his way as he is a free agent. Keep Swisher, and if he does bad your stuck. Keep Nady, trade Swisher
Posted by: snowjev | January 08, 2009 at 04:48 PM
If the Reds traded Bailey and Stubbs and all they got was a heavily discounted Nady I'd be sick.
Nady is not that good a player.
I wouldn't offer any more then two mid-level prospects for Nady. One year of his just isn't worth any more then that. Its not like he's some guy with a history of .300/30/100 seasons under his belt after all.
Posted by: schellis | January 08, 2009 at 04:48 PM
I keep seeing Homer Baily's name come up. I haven't seen this kid pitch...but his numbers thus far are atrocious: 4-8 6.72 .318baa in one of the worst divisions in MLB.
Does he have A stuff and just hasn't put it together yet...or is he a bust?
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:49 PM
UMMM....that's why I said that Sanchez or Veras could close FOR Hoffman...because he's not there anymore.
Yeah I totally misread that haha.
Posted by: Beer n Baseball | January 08, 2009 at 04:49 PM
I have been saying this for a while. Manny will be going to the Yankees. i actually predicted that Nady will be traded for minor deal and then they are going to sign him.
Posted by: terry180 | January 08, 2009 at 04:49 PM
Ralow speaks the truth.
Posted by: David | January 08, 2009 at 04:50 PM
Swisher is by far and away the better player of the two. If I were the Reds Swisher would be the only one I would talk about.
Posted by: schellis | January 08, 2009 at 04:50 PM
I beg to differ about Nady, ever since he came to the Bronx, he killed my Sox numerous times. I think he is a player who plays under the radar.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 08, 2009 at 04:51 PM
Homer Bailey was rated one of the best prospects in all of baseball two years ago, but has not been able to put it all together yet. He's 22-23 yrs. old. So still VERY YOUNG and capable of turning it around.
Lot's of people have written him off, but you never know what can happen in the right situation. Look at Gavin Floyd with the ChiSox.
Posted by: dphill314 | January 08, 2009 at 04:52 PM
"Ralow speaks the truth".
Actually, I said that...so thanks! lol
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:52 PM
Bailey has a ton of talent but a ten cent head, he was also heavily tinkered with by the Reds coaching staff, and as such lost a good chunk of his natural stuff. Went back to his old way and his stuff came back from what I've been told. Reds brass apparently has no intention of trading him unless the pay off is big.
I don't see Bailey being dealt for someone like Nady or Swisher for that matter.
Posted by: schellis | January 08, 2009 at 04:53 PM
nady is good
Posted by: alex | January 08, 2009 at 04:53 PM
Get rid of Damon and Matsui keep Nady and Swish and sign Manny. it would be nice to have one more big bat and don't forget about Sheets he could help as well.
Posted by: mdmonline | January 08, 2009 at 04:54 PM
Nady is a average corner OF, he's not going to bring back any top prospects and if he did said GM should be fired on the spot.
Posted by: schellis | January 08, 2009 at 04:54 PM
dphill - I wasn't slamming the kid...I was asking a question because I haven't seen him pitch.
Anyone who is highly touted and only 22 still deserves a chance to prove themselves...if they have A stuff and the HEAD to pitch at this level.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:54 PM
Nady is going to bring far less with Boras as his agent, therefore he won't sign any kind of extension to whomever may want him. That will drop his trade value to 60-75% more than likely, so unless they can trade him to the Pirates and Huntington and swindle them (oops! They already swindled the Pirates for him!) they are going to have to keep nady and depend on him to provide the .290/20/90 season he will probably have next season and hopefully, keep Swisher as well.
Posted by: johns | January 08, 2009 at 04:56 PM
"Get rid of Damon"
Johnny is going NOWHERE. Who leads off is he's gone? He's one of the top 10 leadoff hitters in MLB.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:56 PM
Matsui is completely untradeable because of his contract and injury history.
Damon has to stay otherwise there is no proven CF, though Damon isn't really one himself any more.
Unless you want to roll out the Nady, Swisher, Manny OF, which would be all sorts of horrible defensively this would be a very bad idea.
Posted by: schellis | January 08, 2009 at 04:56 PM
i would trade matsui
have damon,nady and swisher play the outfeild. then wait till next year to get vlad gurrero or mat holliday
Posted by: alex | January 08, 2009 at 04:56 PM
no way the reds would trade bailey for nady much less bailey and stubbs for nady
id give the yanks something like daryl thompson/matt maloney and josh roenicke and MAYBE a lower level prospect
Posted by: redsfan | January 08, 2009 at 04:56 PM
"Nady is going to bring far less with Boras as his agent"
That's a good point. All the more reason to keep him...or wait to the all star break...and trade him to a desperate team THEN...only if Swish is doing well.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 04:57 PM
I still think the Yankees should keep Nady and try to work on an extension with him. There is no way any team would allow the Yankees to sign Holliday after what happened this offseason.
Posted by: John Ginder | January 08, 2009 at 04:59 PM
I really hope the mets trade for nady
Posted by: zack | January 08, 2009 at 05:00 PM
"Matsui is completely untradeable because of his contract and injury history"
Absolutely WRONG. An AL team needing a DH could do MUCH worse than having Matsui on a ONE year deal and hitting .290 25 100.
"Damon has to stay otherwise there is no proven CF"
Sorry...WRONG again! Damon is the starting LF.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 05:01 PM
Rays don't need another OF - Viva Espana~
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 05:05 PM
At least from the times I've seen Nady, I thought he was more than just average, I was really impressed with his play.
Posted by: Cyyoung | January 08, 2009 at 05:05 PM
Good point John Ginder. I don't think there is anyway other teams will allow Holliday to sign with the Yanks either. They will over pay before that happens.
I brought it up before that a combo like Daryl Thompson or Matt Maloney and maybe a OF prospect or two would be enough to get Nady and everyone bashed it. If the price to get Nady will be lowered b/c Boras is his agent I still say some kind of combination like this could snag Nady.
Posted by: dphill314 | January 08, 2009 at 05:05 PM
There's still so many free agents, I'm not sure how much of a market there is for Nady right now.
I wonder if the Yankees will need to wait a while for the FA market to come to a conclusion before trading him.
___________________________
I'm not sure if that's valid. It probably wouldn't make sense for a team looking to get younger (Giants) to trade for Nady unless they're giving you back someone as a salary dump (Rowand) or piss poor prospects, neither of those the Yanks would want anyway. Where it would make sense would be for a team that's looking to contend next year, who's shopping on the cheap looking for a complementary bat. Not a superstar but a solid player who can deliver .280/25 hrs/85 rbis. Nady certainly will be motivated going into next year.
I could see:
The Twins (especially if they plan on moving Young for another piece).
Angels (1b or LF)
Marlins (1b)
Mets (RF)
All of those teams, except the Mets. could probably spare the 2 prospects that are not top 5. You can add a few other teams on their that might want a more experienced bat (Dodgers if no Man-NY, Reds, Rockies).
Posted by: YanksFanSince78 | January 08, 2009 at 05:05 PM
Of course. He's not overrated enough or past his prime yet, so he can't play in NY.
Posted by: bigpat | January 08, 2009 at 05:07 PM
Cyyoung....I am right there with you. Nady is a good player but not the player you start auctioning the farm for. This is why I am believing this is more media speculation than the wheels actually being in motion to get Nady out of here. Everyone in baseball is basically available for the right price. Now that the Yanks signed Tex other teams realized the Yanks had a spare part and inquired hoping they could get one of them cheaply. If I were another GM I would not give up a top prospect to get a one year rental out of a just a solid player. And if I were Cashman I would not trade Nady for a couple of mid level prospects who would probably never see pinstripes just for depth in our farm system.
Unless someone comes up with a great offer I don't see it happening. And if a team is willing to wager a good prospect for Nady its just not good business.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 05:08 PM
bigpat - This has been a conversation of gentleman thus far. Take your jacka$$y comments elsewhere.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 05:09 PM
Klit Kommander is the best screen name on this whole site. Long live Jay and Silent Bob! :)
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 05:10 PM
yanks 09
Wonder if the yanks can make a deal with:
G. Gonzalez (athletics)
z
Posted by: arod13 | January 08, 2009 at 05:12 PM
I seriously wonder what the Yankees would be looking for. A young outfield prospect maybe? Package Nady with Kennedy/Aceves and try to get a top level corner outfield prospect? The Braves apparently had a lot of interest in Swish before he was traded to the Yankees. They are desperately seeking some outfield help why not try to package Swish with Kennedy and another prospect for Heyward.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 04:40 PM
Yeah...We wouldn't trade Heyward for Peavy...Don't think we're going to then turn around and be open to trading him for Swisher.
Posted by: ksesxe | January 08, 2009 at 05:13 PM
I don't see the Twins needing Nady. However, I like that Dennard Span. He looks like a good prospect...and can flat out fly! They don't have room for him and have plenty of young starters. I wonder if a bullpen package could land him?
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 05:13 PM
Will the Yanks get Jake Peavy as the icing on the cake? Nady, Melky, Hughes and Sanchez for Peavy sounds good.
But much more likely is the proposed trade on this blog in which the Yanks get David DeJesus and Zach Greinke. That trade would unquestionably make the Yankees an untouchable juggernaut. In any event, I hope Brian Cashman isn't finished yet because one more big trade is needed to seal the deal in CF and to acquire a top notch #4 starter.
Posted by: stevee | January 08, 2009 at 05:16 PM
Si...Rocco probably to the Sox. Unlikely the Yankees and Rays trade anyway since they are new rivals in the same division.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 05:17 PM
A few things.
1. Heyward is untouchable. I think that was determined by now.
2. Gio doesn't go anywhere unless its for a good 3B/SS prospect. You can get corner OF power on the FA market; there is ZERO need for the A's to trade for Nady. And, the A's have enough 1B/OF/DH types anyways.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 08, 2009 at 05:17 PM
Wonder if the yanks can make a deal with:
E. Volquez or J. Cueto (reds)
z
Posted by: arod13 | January 08, 2009 at 05:17 PM
I don't think the Yankees are finished by any means...but I don't see the Royals giving up Greinke either unfortunately. DeJesus maybe...but not their afforable ace.
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 05:18 PM
arod13 - No way on earth the Reds are trading one of their young stud starters. Why would they??
Goodnight all~
Posted by: jjyankeesfan2 | January 08, 2009 at 05:19 PM
Nady and IPK for Harang.
Posted by: YankFan408 | January 08, 2009 at 05:20 PM
johns- I don't really think the Nady trade was the Yanks fleecing the Pirates.
Here's what you have to keep in mind with potential "fluke" players. Teams know about this stuff. Had the Pirates kept him through the end of the season, and he had returned to '07/rest of career numbers, the Bucs would have to dump him.
Karstens is a BOR starter in the NL. And he's team controlled.
Tabata had a down first half, but he's been highly acclaimed, AND he rebounded in the 2nd half. John Sickels gave him a B+, and he doesn't give out B+ lightly.
I don't remember the other guys though. But just those two is a decent, if not good, haul for Nady.
Posted by: melonis rex | January 08, 2009 at 05:20 PM
Gio Gonzalez would be nice but Billy Beanes already got his hand full with one year rentals in Holliday.
ksesxe I think the Braves wouldn't do that trade because Peavy because of Peavy's contract. I could see a package of Swish/Kennedy/Coke and another mid level prospect getting it done for Heyward. That fills 3 positions right there for the Braves. I'm not saying it would happen because Heyward is the Braves pride and joy but I wouldn't rule it out.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 05:21 PM
hey Beisbol Keed YOu're a funny dude lol.
Look people stop talking bout peavy and the yankees. didnt we go over this already? he doesnt want to come to the AL and i dont think the yanks are giving up hughes or aJax for a guy who doesnt even want TO be a Yankee. Thats it stop day dreaming bout him and things like That its time for a reality check
Posted by: eLneneM360 | January 08, 2009 at 05:22 PM
HOW about N.Evans and a pitching prospect to Yanks 4 Nady.
Posted by: jvent | January 08, 2009 at 05:23 PM
The Sox add Rocco Baldelli and the Yankees trade away Nady? I don't think so. Unless there is a master plan in place I don't see the Yankees trading Nady. The fact is that I don't think the Yankees can get adequate value coming back in an outfielder or super utility type. Swisher is the only bat they would have off the bench and he gives them flexibility and depth close to their competition.
Posted by: David | January 08, 2009 at 05:25 PM
melonis rex....I think Karstens will be a very serviceable SP in the years to come, especially in the NL. Tabata I was upset the Yankees traded. I got a chance to see him play first hand in spring training 2007 and was very impressed by him. I don't think he will become superstar status, but he will be a very good player, and a very good complimentary player. One like the Yankees needs to compliment Tex and Arod in the years to come.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 05:25 PM
get real arod
Posted by: Chris from Cincy | January 08, 2009 at 05:25 PM
I don't think any deal for Nady will happen until after a few of the other outfield free agent options are signed.
Posted by: Chris from Cincy | January 08, 2009 at 05:28 PM
Didn't Cashboy just trade the 950+ OPS Tabata (not for the Yanks, of course) and Pittsburg's #3 or 4 starter, in Ohlendorf, for this X dude? and he's already trying to dump him??
Didn't he realize that 'X' can't play D or has more holes in his swing than swiss cheese?
LOL! gotta love Cashboy. You go, man.
Posted by: Dirty Water | January 08, 2009 at 05:29 PM
Yankees Get:
Jake Peavy SP
Padres Get:
Phil Hughes SP
Phil Coke SP/RP
Xavier Nady OF
Melky Cabrera OF
Humberto Sanchez RP
Ian Kennedy SP
Francisco Cervelli C
Posted by: mikelovesbaseball94 | January 08, 2009 at 05:30 PM
I am just wondering what the Yanks are thinking if they trade away Nady. What is Swish doesn't work out? What if Gardner doesn't develop? We would have a hole at every outfield spot next season. Damon will be a free agent (actually hope they resign him I love watching him play as long as its not in CF), Matsui will more than likely be gone now that Posada can't shift to 1b if he wears down at catcher and would have to DH, Gardner is still young and who knows with young players, its not a given Austin Jackson would be ready for the bigs in 2010 he is still just a prospect. The Yankees got a hard lesson last year and hopefully learned too much depth is never a bad thing.
Posted by: yanks09 | January 08, 2009 at 05:31 PM
This trade would allow the Yankees to pursue Manny Ramirez as well.
Posted by: mikelovesbaseball94 | January 08, 2009 at 05:32 PM
Is Harang even considered to be on the market?
Posted by: GD31892 | January 08, 2009 at 05:33 PM
IMO, it makes perfect sense for the Yankees to trade Xavier Nady. Consider these circumstances:
1. The Yankees would have six outfielders on their Opening Day roster. Even with Matsui as the DH, that's still one too many outfielders to have. Damon in LF, Gardner in CF, Swisher at RF (his best fielding position), and Cabrera as the fourth outfielder should be competent defensively. Nady is not very good on the field (trust me, I've seen him in action, and he appears more nonchalant than even Cano at times).
2. Right now, Nady's trading value couldn't be higher. He posted career highs in many statistics, and many analysts believe this is his ceiling. He's also only 29 years old with one-year left on his contract, and that attracts a lot of attention from teams that would like to stick with low salary, short-term deals.
3. He doesn't appear to be the type of player that the Yankees would like to keep. Besides his sub-par defense, he is a very aggressive player at the plate, which is contrary to the Yankees' theme of patience. Even with a low average, Swisher provides more power while displaying excellent plate discipline (he took the most pitches per plate appearance out of any MLB player this year).
It's the perfect time for the Yankees to sell high while lowering their payroll (possibly under $200 million with their current payroll estimated at about $202 million) and solidify their roster. They may not get too much in return, but they don't seem to be too concerned.
P.S. This is not a chance for the Yankees to sign Manny. They are doing this to lessen the number of outfielders on their roster, not retain it.
Posted by: TimeToGetReal | January 08, 2009 at 05:34 PM