![]() |
|
|
| |
« Nationals Sign Five | Main | Giants, Twins To Take A Chance On Marte? »
On this date 46 years ago, Willie Mays signed a new contract for $100K, becoming the highest paid player in baseball. Mays hit .304-49-141 with a 165 OPS+ at the age of 31. He was also the runner-up for the NL MVP, his sixth top-5 finish. He would go on to finish in the top-5 three more times. Forty-six years later, Mays may have helped influence Ken Griffey Jr.'s decision to sign with his original franchise. With most players already in their respective camps, several big names are still looking for an empty locker. Let's take a look at what is being written in the Blogosphere...
Cork Gaines writes for RaysIndex.com. If you have a suggestion for this feature, Cork can be reached here.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Wow that depth chart site is a joke. The slightest bit of research at all and you'd know Gabbard isn't going to be a starter.
Posted by: kinsler5 | February 20, 2009 at 09:18 AM
I think in order to write for mlbtraderumors, you should know how to spell "Willie Mays." That's like the sportswriter equivalent of "your" versus "you're," only there's less of an excuse for that.
Posted by: P.S. | February 20, 2009 at 09:23 AM
The MLBDepthchart website seems to be at times organized by meer guessing rather then actual investigation. Swisher is listed as the starting CF for the Yanks even though it has been documented that the Yankees consider him the 4th maybe at best the 3rd option to play that position. Its far more likely that he is the staring RFer. Also saying that Aceves could battle for a setup role with a good spring training, that tidbit is pure fantasy. Aceves hasnt been talked in that role at all, and doesnt have the stuff to pull it off(according to scouting reports)
As for the Red Sox section they label Masterson as a front of the rotation guy, and i havent seen a reputable publication go near that. Most places say hes better suited to the pen, seeing as he is projected to have problems getting lefties out on a consistant basis in a starting role.
Posted by: CosaOneNYC | February 20, 2009 at 09:25 AM
In regards to the HotStoveNewYork.com article:
The moment that i read "Losing Burrell to the Rays via free agency, opened the door for Ibanez" i laughed off most of this article. Ibanez signed before Burrell and Philly and Cubs fans looking back should be shaking their heads. Dunn 2/20 Abreu 1/5 and Burrel 2/16 is much much better value than Bradley and Ibanez at 3/30 and change. Also Burnett is one of the worst signings of the off-season. We all know he has the ability to be a good starter, but 5/82.5 on potential is idiotic. Melonis said in the "future boras crop" thread that the bigger the market the more moron fans of that market by default (paraphrase). I think that article proves his thesis nearly flawless
Posted by: metsknicksrutgers | February 20, 2009 at 09:40 AM
Is this "Willy" Mays Hayes the righter is talking about. Apologies, please let me retract my writer spelling error.
Posted by: tbone88 | February 20, 2009 at 09:44 AM
the cubs projection from goat riders of the apocalypse (i hate the name of that site BTW) has every regular hitting at least .280 and an OBP of at least .340, as well as some pretty serious power numbers from a couple of guys. i'm an eternally optimistic cub fan, but that seems ludicrous to me. they've got soriano hitting 40 HR's, 40 2B'S from bradley (that's assuming a lot of health from those guys.) and theriot only caught stealing 5 times? not likely.
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | February 20, 2009 at 09:51 AM
In regards to the HotStoveNewYork.com article:
The moment that i read "Losing Burrell to the Rays via free agency, opened the door for Ibanez" i laughed off most of this article. Ibanez signed before Burrell and Philly and Cubs fans looking back should be shaking their heads. Dunn 2/20 Abreu 1/5 and Burrel 2/16 is much much better value than Bradley and Ibanez at 3/30 and change. Also Burnett is one of the worst signings of the off-season. We all know he has the ability to be a good starter, but 5/82.5 on potential is idiotic. Melonis said in the "future boras crop" thread that the bigger the market the more moron fans of that market by default (paraphrase). I think that article proves his thesis nearly flawless
Posted by: metsknicksrutgers |
Not to mention the "...without further adu" brainfart.
Posted by: MickS | February 20, 2009 at 09:51 AM
You might run like Mays but you hit like sh!t
Posted by: CosaOneNYC | February 20, 2009 at 09:51 AM
I am sick of people comparing the beginning of this year's market to the state it is at now. If there are several teams allegedly bidding for services of a player it doesn't mean its overpaying. Talk to me after the season if Ibanez vs Burrell makes sense. Right now its projection on all of our parts.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | February 20, 2009 at 09:52 AM
you may write like gaines but you spell like s!@#.
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | February 20, 2009 at 09:53 AM
On the depth chart site, it says my Nats have Ray King back, but I can't seem to find any backing anywhere. Anyone know if there's any truth to this?
Posted by: Matt | February 20, 2009 at 09:53 AM
Metsknicksrutgers,
I fully agree, stopped reading after the first "top" free agent: Milton Bradley.
Posted by: Maracucho | February 20, 2009 at 09:54 AM
MickS-- Hahahahah! you're kidding me right? Which player were they talking about when the writer put that down? I didn't read a bunch of them because bradley ibanez and burnett were right at the beginning.
Posted by: metsknicksrutgers | February 20, 2009 at 09:54 AM
Oh and PhilsWSChamps -- I agree with you, i was just picking apart that article. Looking back we also overpaid for KRod when we coulda gotten Wood or Hoffman on one year deals. I do believe KRod will have a better season than those 2, but 32 million dollars better than Hoffman? Not sure about that one. Regardless, these articles are just insane. That MLBDepthCharts one has casey Fossum in the Mets bullpen. Mets BP circa 2008 would make sense but not this year. Unless they were just throwing another lefty in there
Posted by: metsknicksrutgers | February 20, 2009 at 09:57 AM
mkr,
yes unfortunately there's no IQ test that's required for starting a blog.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | February 20, 2009 at 10:00 AM
Phils -- Case in point would be MetsBlog (which i do avidly read and my brain hates me for it) and LoHud yankees blog. What i don't understand is how Beerleaguer is so good, yet the Yankee/Mets blogs are absolutely thoughtless. On another note, these reports of A-rod having the same trainer as Juan Gonzalez is really gonna hurt the DR. Some of the names that trained with this guy: Ortiz, Pedro Martinez, Juan Guzman. Atleast this report is something besides A-Roid lying constantly
Posted by: metsknicksrutgers | February 20, 2009 at 10:05 AM
That "Hot Stove NY" site just listed all the most expensive and long term deals, many of which were horrible! haha
And after that deplorable spelling error, Cork Gaines = not holding his own around here. Mikky Mantel would be rolling in his grave.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | February 20, 2009 at 10:13 AM
phils - agreed with the market, but even as that deal happened it was clear that it was too much money and too long a deal for a guy who is best suited as a DH.
Posted by: Athletic Domination | February 20, 2009 at 10:18 AM
The MLBDepthcharts.com site really offers alot of insight and originality. All that guy did was go on whatever the official team website is (clevelandindians.com for example) look at the depth chart on there and then make the same one on his webpage.
Goatriders of the apocalypse...Not sure if what he was up to this morning, but Zambrano a big game pitcher? I guess if you don't count october maybe. Harden a perennial Cy Young candidate...please the guy pitches 5 innings every start.
Can't see Samardzija as the #5 starter, I think he also has some type of infatuation with Mike Fontenot too... when I was reading his comments, I thought he was talking about Chase Utley. He also predicts Fukodome will have a better year then last year...well all he has to do is hit about .220 to do that. Also can't see the cubs not having Gathright on their roster... other than that I thought he did a pretty good job
Posted by: chiefwahoo | February 20, 2009 at 10:24 AM
Oh yeah I forgot about the Carlos Marmol most dominant set up man of his lifetime comment.. He writes pretty good for someone thats 3 years old then. I know his IQ is probably around that
Posted by: chiefwahoo | February 20, 2009 at 10:28 AM
That Top 20 FA signings list immediately lost it's credibility when I saw Milton Bradley's name...
If you are actually going to put the Bradley signing as one of the Top 20, at least hide it in the article, don't put it at the top, haha... Does anyone actually think that Bradley is really going to get more than 1000 PA's over the life of that contract?
Posted by: GoTribe | February 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM
Athletic Domination,
i agree that it may be a bit much but the per year cost of Ibanez (10+MM) was better than what Burrell would have asked for and received in arbitration. I also think that if we get 25 HR, 115RBI's and a .290 average from him I'll be very happy with it.
Posted by: philsWSchamps | February 20, 2009 at 10:49 AM
"If you are actually going to put the Bradley signing as one of the Top 20, at least hide it in the article, don't put it at the top, haha... Does anyone actually think that Bradley is really going to get more than 1000 PA's over the life of that contract?"
I agree.
Bradley but no love for Giambi?
Posted by: melonis rex | February 20, 2009 at 10:51 AM
melonis rex:
Yeah, the Giambi deal seemed way better than Bradley.. Doesn't look the the big guy will hit for average anymore, but 30+ dingers and 90 RBI looks pretty good for $5 million.
Posted by: GoTribe | February 20, 2009 at 11:20 AM
GoTribe,
"Yeah, the Giambi deal seemed way better than Bradley.. Doesn't look the the big guy will hit for average anymore, but 30+ dingers and 90 RBI looks pretty good for $5 million."
I look for Burrell to do exactly those same stats, plus maybe some more in the confines of the dome in St.Petersburg for the Rays this season and he'll be a perfect RH power option to protect the equal LH power option Pena for at least the next 2 seasons at a very affordable 8M per season.
Posted by: johns | February 20, 2009 at 12:13 PM
I still don't understand why Griffey decided to go back to Seattle. If he wanted any chance at all at one last chance at a World Series, I would have thought going to Atlanta would present a better opportunity, Seattle just flat out sucks.
Posted by: wes37walz | February 20, 2009 at 02:49 PM
something of interest for cub fans captain has decided on his line up for now so it seems,here an article from yahoo
Soriano will remain in leadoff spot for Cubs
Alfonso Soriano retuned the the position in the Chicago Cubs batting order he left in rumor only Thursday, when manager Lou Piniella said Soriano will remain the No.1 hitter in the lineup.
Earlier this week, Piniella said he was considering dripping Soriano down in the order to take advanage of his power. Thursday, according to MLB.com, Piniella projected the Chicago lineup as follows: Soriano, Aaron Miles, Derrek Lee, Milton Bradley, Aramis Ramirez, Kosuke Fukudome, Geovany Soto and Ryan Theriot.
"That seems like a real nice lineup to me," Piniella said. "Left, right, left, right — we have some balance, we have some speed. You can add [Micah] Hoffpauir as one of those left-handed bats."
So, will Soriano stay at the top of the order?
"That hasn't changed," Piniella said. "There are going to be times when he's not in the lineup, so basically we have to figure out who is going to be that guy, and how you do it is play around with it in Spring Training."
Posted by: justme | February 22, 2009 at 11:43 PM
Well here's the thing if D Lee doesn't show flashes of his 2005 form which isn't going to happen then he needs to drop down fast. I feel A-Ram is the best fit for the 3 hitter OK and why not Soriano in the 4 spot he only capable person of hitting 40+ homers not only that Heres my lineup
1. Theriot Bats R
2. Fontonot(High OBP) Bats L
3. A-Ram(I Stated MY case for both 3 and 4) Bats R
4. Soriano Bats R
5. Bradley (Bats LEFTY/RIGHTY)
6. D LEE (HE STILL RELIABLE HES A GREAT 6 MAN NOT AS GOOD AS BEN GORDON BULLS THOUGH) BATS R
7.SOTO (WE PRETTY MUCH KNOW WHAT WHERE GONNA GET HERE) BATS R
8 FUKODOME L GIVEM CONSISTENT AT BATS FOR NOW IF HE DOESNT DO GOOD REED NEEDS TO GO IN. A BATS L
9. PITCHER (ITS WHATEV)
SOMEOBODY TELL ME WHY THIS WONT WORK
Posted by: mdonnellyacn | February 24, 2009 at 12:08 AM