![]() |
|
|
| |
« Indians Willing To Trade Cliff Lee? | Main | 2010 Options: Tampa Bay Rays »
Links for Friday...
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Scot Gregor of the Daily Herald wonders if Luis Vizcaino could return to the White Sox.
No Scot (where is the other T?), he can't
Posted by: MPM | April 24, 2009 at 10:01 AM
I am actually kind of surprised that the Cubs released Vizcaino...he is actually a very solid middle reliever. As long as he goes somewhere where the home runs will be limited (his only problem), he will be a great value for anyone who takes a chance on him.
Posted by: Forrest | April 24, 2009 at 10:23 AM
while bradley is acting like a spoiled child, i wouldn't be a fan of the chicago media either. i listened to dave kaplan's radio show on WGN last night and they had sully (the trib's cubs beat reporter) on and sully was bemoaning the lack of cooperation from bradley. again, i'm not defending bradley's behavior, but it's a little hard to swallow from sully since A) he gives absolutely no worthwhile insight in his game recaps, B) i get better away game recaps from bruce miles from the daily herald, a guy who's paper doesn't allow him to travel to away games due to money concerns, C) is the absolute LAST person you hear reporting on any legitimate trade rumor, and D) his end of the year recap written to fans after last season's flameout was to burn all our cubs gear, not renew season ticket packages and forget about baseball, at least for the winter. this guy has the nerve to call out a struggling player for being uncooperative when he subjects us to his "reporting"? he then went on to say he was going to someone's house to watch the bulls game and "drink milton bradley off my mind." that's a great idea sully. you concern yourself with milton bradley, who won't even be playing for a while now, the rest of us will concern ourselves with a team that has scored 1 run in approximately 20 innings, has a wreck of a bullpen, can't catch the ball, and is going to play the first-place, red-hot, arch-rival cardinals, at their place, where they've lost twice all year. if the cubs were winning and playing overall good baseball, then milton bradley's lack of access to the media being the main story would be a little more tolerable. but, the cubs have bigger problems than a hurt player's relationship with the already notoriously bad local media.
/sorry about the rant
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | April 24, 2009 at 10:26 AM
man, you cubs fans are going to be so screwed with this guy. He is on a team i dont even regularly follow and he is already annoying even me! and you guys have him for four years!!
Posted by: 04Forever | April 24, 2009 at 10:29 AM
"and you guys have him for four years!!"
Three years, and please dont make it worse then it is.
Also, if he can not play 75 games this year (which he is on pace for only about 100, and isnt healthy yet) then the third year will not vest and it will be only 2. I have my fingers crossed.
Posted by: SuzysMan | April 24, 2009 at 10:37 AM
Vizcaino sucks.
He misses a lot of bats because he's got some pretty decent stuff, but otherwise he's got some huge issues.
This is a guy who's always had command issues. He walks a pretty good number of guys (3.79 career BB/9) and has never been one to keep the ball down in the zone. He's pretty homer-prone (1.3 career HR/9)and his groundball rate has been below 36% in each of the past two seasons.
I think they should've kept Gaudin instead.
Posted by: scribbletone | April 24, 2009 at 11:04 AM
I'm with Bradley on this one. The Chicago media sees him as nothing more than juicy headlines. I think his best bet is to not give them any fuel for the fire. With the Cubs as a whole, they take everything out of context and add a negative spin - there's not a doubt in my mind they would love nothing than a Bradley collapse.
This is one instance that I think Milton is showing a sign of maturity.
Posted by: jen526 | April 24, 2009 at 11:44 AM
100backeduptrucks,
I heard that same radio show and Sullivan's remarks. I want to join your rant a bit. Sully adds no insight as in basically none. His articles report the obvious. If you fell asleep for a couple days under a rock pile or was out of town and heard no news, I guess Sully's read is better than nothing. His 'Ask Sully' mailbag is heavily filled with sarcastic remarks aimed at fans and players. Again, insight is lost. The same with any radio/TV interview he does on any station. Seriously, he knows all about how to be sarcastic and offers very little more than the obvious to fans who really follow the team. I guess the casual or jerky Cub fan needs someone to get basic information from as well. He fills that void. The 'drink Milton away' comment was outright stupid on Sullivan's part. I did enjoy the first caller after that Sully nonsense that questioned media people and their intent on getting a story.
I agree that there are several things that need fixing in the early go and Bradley's media relationship is far down on that list. Focus on that though. Guys can't pick up/throw a ball. The pen is getting punched around or walking everyone. Other than a couple guys, the lineup can't hit or move people over. One of my most disliked statements from players is, 'it's early yet'. No it's not. Any spring, especially this year's longer spring training is plenty of time to get stupid play worked out.
However, I'm not a live and die if the team wins or loses on a daily basis. I enjoy my health. Nor am I apologizing for Bradley and his added nonsense. But let's not let people like Sully deter what is important. Guys will hit, including Bradley. Hopefully, the pen issues get turned around soon. Sullivan has made fun of the Wrigley circus in the past and he is just adding to it. It's a rarity I read or hear Sully anymore. I usually turn the channel or skip his articles.
Posted by: studio179 | April 24, 2009 at 12:09 PM
"I'm with Bradley on this one. The Chicago media sees him as nothing more than juicy headlines. I think his best bet is to not give them any fuel for the fire."
I would agree with this at first glance, but take a closer look at what was said
"I'm just not into negativity," he said. "I can see already I'm going to be that guy that since nothing else is going on in here -- 'We're going to harp on Bradley all year and see if we can get him to snap.' I'm not going to go for it.
"You can't get a good story if I don't talk to [the media]," he said. "You'll make something up like you always do. If I talk to you, you're going to make something up, and if I don't talk to you, you're going to make something up. So just go ahead and make something up and leave me out of it."
that plays right into the 'the world is out to get me' mentality that Bradley has constantly given his entire career. Is there some truth to it? Yes, probably is. But nothing else is going on with the Cubs? Wrong Bradley. “We’re going to harp on Bradley all year” is what the Media is thinking because they asked you very relevant questions in the first two weeks of you signing a big contract? They are going to make something up if you talk to them or not? Really Milton, they just make everything up? He is making everything about himself, without taking in realistic expectations. He is complaining about things that everyone else deals with, as if he shouldn’t be subjected to any questions. And he is writing off all reporters as making things up or twisting his words constantly, as if this has anything to do with the constant distraction and detriment he has been on the field. He is not taking any steps to better himself, or handle the situation better – he is merely avoiding it, which will always make it worse.
Then "I never had a problem in my life until I started playing baseball," he said. "All of a sudden, there are all these things.”
Wait a minute Milton, you never had any problems before baseball? And all of a sudden you have all these problems because your employer unrealistically (in your eyes) wants you to not fight anyone and everyone who questions you and to respect their desire for you to show hustle on the field? Those were the issues early in your career lack of hustle, a lack of desire shown and the inability to control your temper when things didn’t go your way. (not surprisingly, they are also the root of problems things that continue to plague you today) But none of that is really your fault, right? You never had any issues before baseball and people expected unrealistic things of you (ie, presenting yourself as an adult)
Posted by: SuzysMan | April 24, 2009 at 12:29 PM
Yeah, I think Bradley is letting this get into his head a bit.
He clearly has developed some sort of idea that things revolve around him, although honestly Bradley is just a cog in a very good Cubs team.
If Fukudome proves that he can be a good offensive producer, then Bradley's bat won't be nearly as important to Chicago's hopes of making the playoffs.
I think that a big problem with Bradley is that he refuses to blame himself for practically anything, despite the fact that some of this is clearly his fault. He fails to go 100% on every ball in play, he didn't run out a groundball earlier this week, and he snapped and got suspended for making contact with an umpire. At no point does Bradley ever seem to realize that he's an adult and he's responsible for his actions, and everything he does is under a microscope as an athlete.
I like Bradley. I like the fire and emotion he plays with, and I think he has the ability to make that lineup truly scary. But unless he can control his emotions, accept his responsibilities as an adult, suck it up, stay healthy, and just play, then I'm not sure that he's a good thing for the Cubs. And honestly everyone knew all of this in December.
Posted by: scribbletone | April 24, 2009 at 12:39 PM
Great hillenbrand article.
Posted by: juiced | April 24, 2009 at 12:41 PM
studio-i heard that follow-up caller as well, and what kaplan said after bugged me. first, i like kaplan, for the most part, I think he's one of the better chicago guys out there, though that's not saying much. he's kind of a homer, but it's not over the top. but, him saying that the athletes owe something to the fans by talking to the media, to me, is incorrect. they owe it to us to play hard. that's it. there's a reason print media is a mess right now: because the people doing the writing and reporting and editing suck at their jobs. of course the reporters will say "if he doesn't talk, we've got to write something." like i said, sully's making bradley the story, and bradley flat out is NOT the story right now. nobody reads newspapers because they write about the wrong thing, and what they do write about is written poorly. is bradley helping the situation? of course not. should we expect him to, given his reputation? again, of course not. i don't really get bent out of shape about athletes being stand-off-ish. he's a grown man who can say whatever he wants to whomever he wants whenever he wants. i'd prefer him just own up to playing hurt/like crap right now just to get the focus back on the team, but the media acting like they have the God-given right to badger a guy who's clearly hurt and struggling in a new city p!sses me off. it's an irrelevant reporter in an increasingly irrelevant medium trying to make an irrelevant subject relevant. let's just hope they wake up against the cards this weekend so we can stop reading about it.
Posted by: 100backeduptrucks | April 24, 2009 at 01:05 PM
"Great hillenbrand article."
Agreed. Nice to see someone do that type of work.
I'm a bit surprised about the Toronto clubhouse but then again, not really.
Posted by: icedrake523 | April 24, 2009 at 01:37 PM
Bradley just can't help but shoot himself in the foot repeatedly. First, he can't always control his emotions, and so he has the reputation of being a hot head and a loose cannon, which isn't entirely fair considering that 95% of the time he's a mild mannered, intelligent human being.
But then to top it off, he ALWAYS falls back on the "victim card," which as everyone knows never endears one to anyone, anytime. He comes off as spoiled and out of touch with reality.
So it's a classic case of a guy being his own worst enemy.
If he was playing every day, and producing like he did last season - it probably wouldn't matter (see Bonds, Barry). But when he seems to suffer from an interminable pulled leg muscle, fans quickly lose patience.
You'll be lucky if you get 300 AB from him. John Daniels was a smart man to let that headache pass on to someone else.
Posted by: J the Dizzolla | April 24, 2009 at 01:41 PM
"I like Bradley. I like the fire and emotion he plays with, and I think he has the ability to make that lineup truly scary. But unless he can control his emotions, accept his responsibilities as an adult, suck it up, stay healthy, and just play, then I'm not sure that he's a good thing for the Cubs. And honestly everyone knew all of this in December."
Scribble: Exactly. I'm not sure if I were the Cubs that I wouldn't allow Milton to only talk to Team affiliated media. Who cares if it keeps him mentally stable?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | April 24, 2009 at 01:41 PM
Man would I have rather had Manny and Lester over Soriano and Arias for A-Rod as a Ranger fan!!!
Posted by: JH32 | April 24, 2009 at 01:48 PM
100,
I, too, like Kaplan for the most part. I, too, did not like his response to that caller. He got all fired up when a media guy or the media in general was being questioned. Just like Bradley should know the media comes with being a pro player, Kaplan should know there are plenty of poor meida reporters out there.
As far as Bradley, he is making it worse. Come on, everyone knows there are media people around town itching to jab him when he signed here. He should know that, too. Just get healthy, stay healthy and hit/catch the ball. That's all I care about. Same thing I use to say about another right fielder with drama on the team a few years ago.
Posted by: studio179 | April 24, 2009 at 02:53 PM
Good article on Hillenbrand, always liked him. Seems like guys that speak their minds and show too much emotion aren't usually very popular. I would love to see Hillenbrand throw a beating to John Gibbons though. I enjoyed the read, good job Mr. Thomas.
Posted by: nrmax88 | April 24, 2009 at 04:53 PM
"I think that a big problem with Bradley is that he refuses to blame himself for practically anything, despite the fact that some of this is clearly his fault. He fails to go 100% on every ball in play, he didn't run out a groundball earlier this week, and he snapped and got suspended for making contact with an umpire. At no point does Bradley ever seem to realize that he's an adult and he's responsible for his actions, and everything he does is under a microscope as an athlete.
I like Bradley. I like the fire and emotion he plays with, and I think he has the ability to make that lineup truly scary. But unless he can control his emotions, accept his responsibilities as an adult, suck it up, stay healthy, and just play, then I'm not sure that he's a good thing for the Cubs. And honestly everyone knew all of this in December." - scribbletone
Well said scribbletone, you hit the nail on the head. As an athlete Bradley is just what the Cubs needed. As a personality and fragile player he's nothing that the Cubs needed to take on. At some point he's going to have to realize that he's the common denominator in all of the trouble he's had. Even if people are coming after him, like the Chicago media or the umpires he's got to be able to control himself, make good decisions and not let his emotions get out of hand and turn into anything violent, disrespectful or hateful. Basically, he needs to grow up. His approach to adverse situations is much like an immature adolescent who acts out on his immediate feelings and can't process conflict without behaving negatively.
Anyway, the point is he needs to grow up and start taking responsibility for his actions. I like the guy too and I think he can help the team but I'm glad that the Cubs can get out of the contract after only two years if he doesn't play enough. That may end up being best for the team.
Posted by: pageian | April 24, 2009 at 05:44 PM
This was sooo predictable of Bradley...I'll say it "I told you so"...Cubs got exactly what was advertised...I'm surprised its happening this early in the season actually...he's acting like he has something to react to...I'll tip my hat to him though, do his 75 games and keep the sample small, keep the numbers up and cash the checks...then find another sucker of a team to bite on another contract...
Posted by: rfro | April 24, 2009 at 06:06 PM
Side issue -- isn't this yet another nail in the coffin in Carrie Muskat's credibility as a journalist? Apparently Milton doesn't consider her part of the Chicago media, since he talked to her. Oh well -- can't wait for her next "mailbag" where she tells us how everything the Cubs do is fantastic, and how Mark Prior should be ready go in just a few more weeks.
Posted by: CubsAddictMG | April 25, 2009 at 12:02 AM