« Phillies Satisfied With Current Bench |
Main
| Luis Gonzalez Still Wants To Play »
By Drew Silva [April 12, 2009 at 11:24am CST]
Happy Easter to those celebrating. Here are your Sunday links...
- Dejan Kovacevic of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette addresses the ever-popular question, "What if the Pirates had drafted Matt Wieters" in 2007?
- Sam Mellinger of the Kansas City Star did some number crunching and determined that forking over major cash for a free agent pitcher is often far too risky. 30 pitchers regressed after inking new deals, while only 13 improved.
- The Chicago Tribune's Paul Sullivan believes the Brewers might make a run at Jake Peavy later this season.
- Cardinals manager Tony La Russa has abandoned the idea of hitting his pitcher eighth for the last three games, and his club is suddenly on a winning streak. "Hitting the guy ninth we've got a winning record," said La Russa. "I don't want to mess around with it." (Quote courtesy of Rick Hummel with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch).
- Tyler Kepner of the New York Times examines the "evolution" of the trade that brought Nick Swisher to the Yankees. As Kepner notes, it "looks like a steal" at this point.
- The Twins are considering a uniform design change for the opening of Target Field in 2010. Joe Christensen of the Minneapolis Star-Tribune wants your suggestions.
- You're obviously a baseball buff if you're checking MLBTR daily, so let me direct you to a brand new site chock-full of streaming baseball-related content. It's NBCSports.com's newest darling, "Circling The Bases," featuring the writing styles of Aaron Gleeman, Matthew Pouliot and Craig Calcaterra.
swisher is a beast, i hope girrardi realises to start him instead of nady soon
Posted by: austin020690 | April 12, 2009 at 11:54 AM
The evolution of the Swisher trade? Here it is.
KW: I have this player, who my manager doesn't like. I HAVE to get rid of him because its my job to keep Ozzie happy. His name is Nick Swisher. What could you give me for him?
BC: How about Wilson Betemit? He can play 2B, 3B, AND SS!!!!!!
KW: Awesome! But I will need to get back some pitching as well or the media will eat me alive.
BC: Hmm. How about a 2 for 1 swap. You throw in this guy, Kanekoa Texeira, and I'll throw in TWO guys, Jeff Marquez and Jhonny Nunez.
KW: Awesome. Done.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 12, 2009 at 12:09 PM
kw thinks he won cause 3 is more then 2
Posted by: austin020690 | April 12, 2009 at 12:12 PM
The Pirates really messed that one up! Now,they are making it thier goal to NOT save money on high draft picks.
Posted by: Tomahawk368 | April 12, 2009 at 01:14 PM
"Sam Mellinger of the Kansas City Star did some number crunching and determined that forking over major cash for a free agent pitcher is often far too risky."
Outstanding. It is this type of groundbreaking research and insight that advances understanding of the game for everyone.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | April 12, 2009 at 01:41 PM
swisher...LOL. i wouldn't have minded just giving him to the yanks.
Posted by: part-time pariah | April 12, 2009 at 02:03 PM
KW kind of had to trade Swisher. All 3 positions he could play were taken by superior players, and he was making too much to be a bench player. KW's hands were kind of tied with how much he could get for him because he had such an aweful year the previous year. If Betimit does anything it's better than Swisher did last year. If Maquez can be a serviceable pitcher, it's a win in my book. Swisher was a player without a position on the Sox.
Posted by: rype123 | April 12, 2009 at 02:34 PM
Melonis knows well how I feel about the Swisher trade..
I think it was arguably the worst move of the offseason, as well as one of KW's worst moves as a GM.
He gave up all that value for Swisher, a good hitter and defensive player, just to trade him for nearly nothing after a poor year that was affected significantly by bad luck. They could have easily have traded Dye or Konerko, both more expensive players, for a similar return, and placed Swisher there. He'd be an upgrade defensively, and he's cheaper and highly likely to bounce back this year.
I just really think that Kenny let Ozzie influence his decision making far too much there, and in the end he didn't end up receiving fair value for Swish.
Posted by: scribbletone | April 12, 2009 at 03:10 PM
When Swisher is whining due to hitting around the .220 mark by the end of the year and benched we will see who wins the trade. Making these crazy statements after a few good games and one week into the year are ridiculous. In my mind, we saved quite a bit on money on a baby.
Posted by: WhiteSox5477 | April 12, 2009 at 03:50 PM
Jermaine Dye has significant more value than Swisher. He's signed for less years, and he's a superior offensive player. The only difference is he's older. Swisher is a good bench player, but only the Yankees could afford to have a bench player making what Swisher does.
Posted by: rype123 | April 12, 2009 at 03:53 PM
It's amazing how often the media and fans keep rehashing this move. It is by far, one of if not the dumbest draft day blunders in the history of sports. But the horse isn't only beaten to death on this subject. The glue has dried and the third generation horse is ready to win the Derby. Where was the media on calling out Littlefield when he was drawing a paycheck from the Pirates? When he was drafting Van Benschoten as a pitcher when everyone declared him a power hitting outfielder. Or Bullington as the first pick of the draft and declaring him a solid 4th starter? Had the media murdered Littlefield earlier and often, maybe he wouldn't have got the chance to draft Moskos instead of Wieters.
That's the real story. Not that the bonehead made that pick, but that he lasted long enough to make that pick.
Posted by: indybucfan | April 12, 2009 at 04:10 PM
McLouth getting a gold glove shows just how obsolete the award has become.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | April 12, 2009 at 04:35 PM
You needed McLouth winning to show how obsolete the award is? The gold glove has never been about the best defense at any particular position. It's all about the offense, always has been.
Posted by: indybucfan | April 12, 2009 at 04:41 PM
"only the Yankees could afford to have a bench player making what Swisher does."
Gary Matthews has no comment, while standing in line to deposit his paycheck.
Posted by: jwb | April 12, 2009 at 05:18 PM
"When Swisher is whining due to hitting around the .220 mark by the end of the year and benched we will see who wins the trade. Making these crazy statements after a few good games and one week into the year are ridiculous. In my mind, we saved quite a bit on money on a baby."
Crazy statements after a few good games?
Before coming to Chicago, Swisher had just had consecutive seasons with OBP's over .370 and OPS+'s over 125, with 57 home runs in that two year span. And that was all done in a very poor hitting environment in Oakland. Everything on Swisher's track record indicates that he was a much better player than he had performed in Chicago, and Kenny Williams went right ahead and sold about as low on Swisher as he could.
"You needed McLouth winning to show how obsolete the award is? The gold glove has never been about the best defense at any particular position. It's all about the offense, always has been."
I wouldn't say that the award is about offense, but it's definitely moreso about reputation than actual performance.
It's never good when you award a Gold Glove to a guy that posted a -13.8 UZR.
Then again, Derek Jeter won it in 2005 despite posting a -14.3 UZR..
Posted by: scribbletone | April 12, 2009 at 05:39 PM
Even before all the specialized stats came out, it was always about reputation moreso than anything, but a good season at the plate never hurt your chances.
Posted by: indybucfan | April 12, 2009 at 05:47 PM
"Had the media murdered Littlefield earlier and often, maybe he wouldn't have got the chance to draft Moskos instead of Wieters.
That's the real story. Not that the bonehead made that pick, but that he lasted long enough to make that pick."
COMPLETELY agree with this. Littlefield being allowed to hold a job for that long is the only big story.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 12, 2009 at 10:28 PM
"Jermaine Dye has significant more value than Swisher. He's signed for less years, and he's a superior offensive player. The only difference is he's older."
One word: Defense. It changes games. The difference between Dye's defense and Swisher's defense is HUGE. Swisher is a MUCH better defender than Dye. Just keep Swisher out of CF.
Swisher is signed at a lower annual salary than Dye though, although Swish is indeed signed for more years.
And, in any year except for 2008, Swisher and Dye's offensive numbers are comparable, when you consider that Swisher played in one of the biggest pitcher's parks in MLB and Dye played in a hitter's park. And Swisher's 2008 was heavily influenced by a flukishly low BABIP.
"Swisher is a good bench player, but only the Yankees could afford to have a bench player making what Swisher does.""
I don't think Cashman traded for Swisher with the intent of making him a bench player. Let's see. Hideki Matsui is injury prone, and Nady had a flukishly good year last year. In 2009, Swisher is insurance for both those guys so Cash won't have to make a trade midseason and give up legitimate good prospects if Matsui gets hurt/Nady regresses. Then, look at the Yankees' OF situation for 2010. Nady, Damon, and Matsui are free agents. So, instead of going after 2 OF FAs in a shallow OF market next year, you stock up this year, when you can get more talent for less cost, and go into next offseason with a leg up. Swisher will almost inevitably be a full time starter in 2010, and I think he displaces Nady as the starting OF soon this season.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 12, 2009 at 10:40 PM
And, about the Yankees the only team who can afford to have a "bench player" making what Swisher makes. Swish makes 5.3MM in 2009.
Other "bench" type guys making more: Bobby Crosby (benched b/c the A's signed Orlando Cabrera), Geoff Jenkins (DFA'd but bench guy on Phillies), Julio Lugo (Lowrie will displace Lugo), etc.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 12, 2009 at 10:45 PM
Oh. How has Marquez pitched for the ChiSox so far? Curious.
Posted by: melonis rex | April 13, 2009 at 01:18 AM
I take that back about Swisher, his average is on its way back to Mendoza but he did pitch for the juggernaut Yankees. What does that say about them? What a great job they do over there.....LOL
Posted by: WhiteSox5477 | April 14, 2009 at 09:10 AM