![]() |
|
|
| |
« Rosenthal On A's, Hart, Byrd | Main | Taking Stock Of Matt Holliday »
If a ten year veteran has played his last five seasons with his current team, he cannot be traded without permission because he has ten and five rights. Chipper Jones, for example, doesn't need a formal no-trade clause as long as he's with the Braves because his ten and five rights assure him that no deal will go through without his approval. Carlos Beltran's also a ten-year veteran, but the Mets could deal him without permission if he didn't have a no-trade clause since he won't have played five years in New York until after the 2009 season.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Beltran does have a full no-trade clause in his contract though.
Posted by: icedrake523 | June 02, 2009 at 01:08 PM
Good call
Posted by: Ben Nicholson-Smith | June 02, 2009 at 01:14 PM
"Beltran does have a full no-trade clause in his contract though."
Hence why Ben said "if he didn't have a no trade clause"
Posted by: melonis rex | June 02, 2009 at 01:14 PM
I changed it! icedrake523 had me at first
Posted by: Ben Nicholson-Smith | June 02, 2009 at 01:20 PM
so what piece of baseball news inspired this post?
Posted by: eddiedanger11 | June 02, 2009 at 01:37 PM
They're starting a glossary for terms such as Ten and Five Rights, Designated for Assignment, etc.
Posted by: icedrake523 | June 02, 2009 at 03:30 PM