MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Odds And Ends: Chapman, Nats, Buehrle | Main | Trade Candidates: Relievers »

Pedro Martinez To Take Physical For Phils

2:57pm: Martino says Pedro's physical will take place tomorrow morning at 10am CST.

11:52am: Andy Martino reports that Pedro landed in Philly for his physical.

10:37am: Ken Rosenthal of FOX Sports hears that the physical will take place tomorrow, which means Pedro could sign as soon as Wednesday. Pedro, who should be ready for the majors in about three weeks, is expected to sign for less than $5MM prorated.

8:42am: MLB.com's Todd Zolecki says Pedro will fly to Philadelphia today and take a physical today or tomorrow. Martinez should sign in the coming days if he passes his physical.

1:35am: WCAU-TV's John Clark is reporting that Pedro Martinez "may be touching down in Philadelphia Monday to meet with Phillies officials."  Tentative phrasing, but enough to catch ESPN's eye.  That Marc Stein ESPN article credits Jayson Stark with some info as well:

After arriving, it is believed Martinez will take a physical, which appears to be the final obstacle standing in the way of the 37-year-old right-hander signing with the Phillies for the remainder of the season.

I'm thinking Pedro will get a couple million bucks, and we'll all talk about the prorated amount to make him feel better.  If a deal is reached, does Martinez have enough left in the tank to bring down the Phils' 5.04 rotation ERA?  The team's high-octane lineup would be paired with a rotation of Cole Hamels, Joe Blanton, J.A. Happ, Jamie Moyer, and Martinez.  I'm curious to see where Pedro would slot into the playoff rotation should the Phillies' four-game division lead hold up.

More food for thought: ESPN's Buster Olney said Thursday that a Pedro signing wouldn't affect a Roy Halladay pursuit.  Would Moyer be the odd man out in the event of a deal, despite the money owed to him through 2010?


Comments

Man Tim is on fire with all these posts tonight! Feels like the old days!

Wow...

If Phils sign Pedro tomorrow, Manuel still has time to add him to the All Star Game!!

It doesn't seem likely Moyer will be in the rotation next year, and he presumably can't/won't work out of the pen. If Pedro shows any signs of life (read as pitches less terribly than Moyer has) and Halladay is acquired then Moyer is definately the odd man out, despite the dollars.

i second SDpads, it does feel better to have Tim posting, no more childish stuff like "saturday night linkage", etc.

so we lose moyer for halladay? am i supposed to care? do it!!!!

Wow...

If Phils sign Pedro tomorrow, Manuel still has time to add him to the All Star Game!!

Posted by: 55saveslives | July 13, 2009 at 02:03 AM

sounds like someone is still bitter over the Victorino over Sandoval vote??

maybe you should have either voted more online or if your team got to the WS last year you could have had Bochy pick whoever he wanted.

If your Giants keep playing like they are this year maybe they can get to the WS and we can see Travis Ishikawa in next year's ASG. We can only hope!!

"sounds like someone is still bitter over the Victorino over Sandoval vote??"

Probably more bitter over Manuel's choice of Howard over Sandoval and it does seem like Manuel is showing favoritism. There are 4 1B and 2 3B on the roster... of the 4 1B, the other 3 are putting up better numbers and Sandoval is as well. Sandoval really was screwed.


"and Halladay is acquired then Moyer is definately the odd man out"

Whether or not Halladay is acquired will probably have nothing to do with it. Moyer has been pitching like a 46 year old man... which is unfortunate because he is one. Last season was likely a fluke or flat out luck.

I don't understand this move at all. Pedro gave up 19 homers in 100 innings and had a 5.6 ERA last year in a pitchers park. Outside of the fact that the Nats, Braves, and Mets are offensively challanged(didn't seem to help current Philly pitching) , I don't see how Pedro is going to improve after another year of age and rust is added to an already past it's prime arm in a park that doesn't allow any mistakes to fly ball pitchers.

Halladay would be ideal for them. On top of being one of the elite pitchers in the game, his style of pitching(grounders and strikeouts) is perfect for their park. If they got him they'd be favorites to repeat. But with Petey, I'm not so scared.

@Spieldogg: as just about every writer has said, Pedro and Halladay are two totally different things...getting one has no effect on the other.

Of course Manuel is picking his guys. That's what managers do for this game. Check out Torre last year. How do you NOT take Howard then when he's leading in HR's and RBI's?

i love this pickup.. phillies are complete idiots - they have a bunch of #4/#5 starters in their rotation - they lack the front end guy they could stick behind Hamels. Adding a fly-ball pitcher whose career looked over last year is a bad move, especially in that ballpark they play in.

"More food for thought: ESPN's Buster Olney said Thursday that a Pedro signing wouldn't affect a Roy Halladay pursuit. Would Moyer be the odd man out in the event of a deal, despite the money owed to him through 2010?"

Probably not. Most likely, what this means is that the Phils think the Blue Jays won't do a Halladay deal without getting Happ as part of the package. In that case, Pedro's still replacing the rotating cast of characters at the 5 slot (Bastardo, Lopez, Carpenter, whatever else Rube drags up from Lehigh), and Halladay replaces Happ, so the rotation is Halladay/Hamels/Blanton/Moyer/Martinez.

This disappoints me...I wanted Mulder if anyone, but yeah well, as long as he is replacing Moyer and not Happ (in a Jays trade) it betters their rotation.

Taking a chance might be worth it after his dominance in the WBC, but so did Sydney Ponsone, and that really hasn't panned out.

"Would Moyer be the odd man out in the event of a deal?"

Not if the Phillies are thinking about sending Happ to the Blue Jays in a trade deal for Halladay. Bringing in Martinez BEFORE a trade with Toronto would be the smart move. Otherwise, the Phillies would still have a hole in their rotation and would be merely swaping a #3-4 starter for a #1 starter.

While Happ at 6-0 in the majors this year is a proven commodity, the Phillies FO think that both Drabek and Carrasco(?)are going to be superior to Happ.

start wearing purple,

and the phils fans could have whined last year that others went instead of Howard who at the time led the NL in HR's and RBI's and ended up 2nd in the MVP voting but didn't make the all star team. Many years injustices are done. if you don't like it, let your team win and then you can do what you want.

If Sandoval doesn't get in this year and deserves it then he'll likely have years where he doesn't necessarily deserve it and he'll get in.

And Maddon did the same with taking Pena instead of Kinsler but I don't hear as much whining as I do about who Manuel is taking.

Ah yes....Can always count on philsWS to throw in...

I don't know why you hate the Giants so much...I'm sure you think Jason Werth was deserving too!

Pedro is probably my favorite player of all time. That said, I can't help but feel that pitching in Philadelphia is going to be a disaster. He could end up making Myers look like D-Lowe (or some equally proficient ground ball artist).

Pedro might be moderately helpful on the road. I wouldn't expect an ERA far under 5. Still better than Moyer.

wouldn't it be ironic to see martinez and halladay in the same rotation? i mean, halladay is basically believed to pitch well into his 40s, and any extension to him will be justified. but couldn't we have believed the same about pedro martinez? i think the jays are wise to trade him now.

Just curious... on Jamie Moyer. Why in the hell did they give him 16 million for 2 years this past offseason? Were they worried some other team was gonna outbid them? A 48 year old who throws a 70 mph heater?

Just boggles my mind on how these clubs throw around cash like its going out of style. Yeah, he won a lot of games last year, but you see how much Wakefield gets (3 million). To give him 2 years at that age is crazy. Now they probably can't afford Holladay because of that bad contract.

If Pedro can post a sub-4.5 ERA then the move makes sense. I'm far from convinced he can. I'm actually pretty well convinced he has no chance of doing so in Citizens' Bank Park. And if that's the case, why not just keep throwing the kids out there? At least the kids are learning something, they're getting better, they're part of your long-term plans, and they're cheaper. I don't think the Phillies are going to benefit very much from this move.

As far as All-Star selections go, Javier Vazquez and Rafael Soriano should have made the team and Charlie's anti-Braves bias showed there. That's OK, though. All of the Braves pitchers will get their 3-days rest and be ready to go in the 2nd half. And they'll be playing with vengence for Charlie's double-snub. Thanks, Charlie. You did the Braves the biggest favor you could have possibly done.

No offense, but if you honestly believe that guys still end up on a mission in the second half for not being named to the All-Star team, perhaps you'd like to hear about my Tennessee oceanfront cabins.

If this were 1979 or 1989, maybe, but this is 2009. People don't care if they don't make the ASG. The only thing it hurts is their bonus not being paid.

Specifically aganist the Phillies they will be on a mission. I wouldn't be surprised if a few balls get tossed at the heads of Phillies players.

"halladay is basically believed to pitch well into his 40s, and any extension to him will be justified. but couldn't we have believed the same about pedro martinez?"

First off that's not irony. Secondly, no one really expected Pedro to pitch great into his 40s. Power pitchers rarely last that long before being forced to convert into a finesse pitcher and small power pitchers last even less time. That was the reason the Dodgers traded him away in the first place, they believed Pedro wouldn't amount to anything in the long run. But Halladay has the build of a long run power pitcher. Barring injuries, Halladay could be expected to have a much longer run than Pedro could have expected.


"on Jamie Moyer. Why in the hell did they give him 16 million for 2 years"

13M not including potential bonuses... and all things considered it was a risky deal considering his age.

Come on, you know better than that. How many times have Braves guys gotten thrown at, slid into, whatever else, and nobody on this team has the guts to retaliate?

You, of all people, should know that this is not a team that retaliates against anything. They'll continue to go about their business as they always have, and play soft. It's what they (unfortunately) do best.

You dont throw at a players head no matter what. That's not how the game is played. Especially not over all-star selection. Players get hit yes, but not for stupid reasons like that, and not above the shoulders.

I absolutely can't the argument of "Welp... you should have won the pennant!". If the manager isn't putting the BEST team available, he isn't doing his job. That goes for both managers. Pena (a 1B) over Kinsler (a 2B that finished SECOND in the final vote) is a crock. Same goes for Charlie taking his OFer (who he didn't even think deserved to be in the final vote) over Kemp.

God forbid these managers keep their homer-ness in check for a few days.

Well I'd like to think we'll retaliate so let me think so please. (You do make good points, though. Even though this is a silly discussion to begin with.)

Look at Jayson Werth's stats in the last 2 weeks. They are pretty damn good. He has been able to hit for power and average as of late and along with his spectacular defense, it may it easy for Charlie to take Werth over Kemp.

Look at Jayson Werth's stats in the last 2 weeks. They are pretty damn good. He has been able to hit for power and average as of late and along with his spectacular defense, it may it easy for Charlie to take Werth over Kemp.

Posted by: Aaron | July 13, 2009 at 11:24 AM
--------------------------

Your comment says it all. Two weeks does not an all-star make.

Your comment says it all. Two weeks does not an all-star make.

Posted by: Timotheus | July 13, 2009 at 11:29 AM
---

I think what Aaron was getting at is that with Charlie watching Werth every day he knows how good he is when he's on, and he's on right now. Because of that it was easy to choose him over Kemp. It didn't have anything to do with two good weeks making someone an all-star.

And to everyone else...wah. Players get snubbed EVERY YEAR. I don't completely agree with Charlie's picks (or Maddon's, for that matter), but come on...you had to see it coming. Learn to deal with it and stop taking it personally, because the players sure as hell have.

Name Team G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Pablo Sandoval SF 82 306 41 102 24 3 15 55 24 48 4 2 .333 .385 .578 .964
Matt Kemp LAD 87 325 48 104 12 6 11 50 34 78 19 4 .320 .384 .495 .879
Jayson Werth PHI 84 308 60 81 15 1 20 56 52 78 12 2 .263 .371 .513 .884

Nuff said??

"Pedro landed in Philly for his physical"

let me know when when he steps in the doctors office

Name Team G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Pablo Sandoval SF 82 306 41 102 24 3 15 55 24 48 4 2 .333 .385 .578 .964
Matt Kemp LAD 87 325 48 104 12 6 11 50 34 78 19 4 .320 .384 .495 .879
Jayson Werth PHI 84 308 60 81 15 1 20 56 52 78 12 2 .263 .371 .513 .884

Nuff said??

Posted by: 55saveslives | July 13, 2009 at 11:49 AM
---

Wah.

Did you not see this coming, this apparently tragic, bleed-out-your-eyes case of an All-star manager picking his own guys to fill out a roster?

You're acting like someone just shot your puppy. They didn't.

And, hell, it's not like he picked someone with Jhonny Peralta-esque numbers. Werth's had an up and down year and he's on the up now. He's a damn good player when he's on and that could mean a lot in an All-star game-- especially to the guy who picked him to go, considering he probably thinks he's got a damn good chance at being in the World Series again and wouldn't mind home field advantage.

"

Name Team G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB K SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
Pablo Sandoval SF 82 306 41 102 24 3 15 55 24 48 4 2 .333 .385 .578 .964
Matt Kemp LAD 87 325 48 104 12 6 11 50 34 78 19 4 .320 .384 .495 .879
Jayson Werth PHI 84 308 60 81 15 1 20 56 52 78 12 2 .263 .371 .513 .884

Nuff said??"

Matt Kemp: CF UZR/150: +14.6
Jayson Werth: RF UZR/150: +7.1
Pablo Sandoval: 3B UZR/150: -2.4

Kemp WAR: 4.2
Sandoval WAR: 3.1
Werth WAR: 2.8

Matt Kemp should be there, and it's so freaking obvious that it makes the ASG even more of a joke.

"11:52am: Andy Martino reports that Pedro landed in Philly for his physical."


12:37am: Joe Schmoe reports Martinez has brushed his teeth and is preparing to call a cab.


In all seriousness though, considering this IS Pedro, I guess it is a big deal that he actually showed up in the right city for his physical.

Ah yes....Can always count on philsWS to throw in...

I don't know why you hate the Giants so much...I'm sure you think Jason Werth was deserving too!

Posted by: 55saveslives | July 13, 2009 at 09:31 AM

haha. You must've missed where i stated in the Jonathan Sanchez post that the Giants are the team as a Phils fan i fear the most if we both get to the postseason.

And like scribbletone I believe that Matt Kemp should have been there but until they take this decision completely out of the manager's hands you'll have this. You've had it for years and years and years. The argument hasn't changed.

Don't go blaming Charlie, blame the system. He's got to be accountable to his players that got him the opportunity to manage the ASG.

Again if Kemp had a problem with it maybe he should have gotten an RBI in the NLCS last year and if he wants to blame one single individual other than himself, it should be Broxton because Matt Stairs' homerun was the killer of that series and everyone knew what was coming.

"haha. You must've missed where i stated in the Jonathan Sanchez post that the Giants are the team as a Phils fan i fear the most if we both get to the postseason."

Over the Dodgers?

I mean, yeah, Lincecum-Cain-Johnson-Zito/Sanchez is scary.

But is it scarier than Billingsley-Kershaw-Kuroda-Wolf on a team with a better defense and a farrrr better offense?

The Dodgers are easily the scariest team in that league. Look at Billingsley and Kershaw's numbers, compare them to Lincecum/Cain. The difference isn't THAT big.

Kershaw/Billingsley: 225 innings, 218 K, 114 BB, 1.91 K/BB, 14 HR, 3.28 ERA

Lincecum/Cain: 244 innings, 244 K, 80 BB, 3.05 K/BB, 15 HR, 2.36 ERA

Basically, the only difference between these two duos is that Lincecum has been so much freaking better than the other three.

I'd take Kershaw and Billingsley over Cain, any day, easily.

"And like scribbletone I believe that Matt Kemp should have been there but until they take this decision completely out of the manager's hands you'll have this. You've had it for years and years and years. The argument hasn't changed."

I realize that.

And that's why I think that managers shouldn't have any choice.

Either give the choice to the fans, the people who are paying to see the game, or give it to analysists who will ensure that the most deserving superstars are on the field.

Nobody wants to turn on the All-Star Game to watch Jayson Werth face Tim Wakefield, while Pujols and Sabathia are watching from the bench.

"sounds like someone is still bitter over the Victorino over Sandoval vote??"

Probably more of the fact that Manuel picked Howard and Werth, both who have absolutely no business whatsoever in the 2009 all star game.

"i love this pickup.. phillies are complete idiots - they have a bunch of #4/#5 starters in their rotation - they lack the front end guy they could stick behind Hamels. Adding a fly-ball pitcher whose career looked over last year is a bad move, especially in that ballpark they play in."

Actually the Mets are the complete idiots. They have 2 men (3 until Redding was kicked to the pen) that are not even good enough to be number 5 starters for a major league baseball team. Pedro should still be a Met. He can still pitch, and be sure I will rub it in everybodys face when he shows it.

"Again if Kemp had a problem with it maybe he should have gotten an RBI in the NLCS last year and if he wants to blame one single individual other than himself, it should be Broxton because Matt Stairs' homerun was the killer of that series and everyone knew what was coming."

Come on kid. This is a joke. You are WAYYYYYY better then that phils.

"Pedro should still be a Met. He can still pitch, and be sure I will rub it in everybodys face when he shows it."

No, he shouldn't. He's a batting practice pitcher. Let's see how he does against real major league hitters, not guys from the Netherlands or in the minors.

Whatever. I never really took your opinion seriously anyway, ever since you started mocking me for not wanting a Santana deal less then a year into the first of 7 seasons. If you only know how to look at ERA, sure, Pedro is done. All other signs point to a guy who is still very capable of pitching, still has his breaking stuff, and is finally healthy for the first time in like 5 years.

"No, he shouldn't. He's a batting practice pitcher. Let's see how he does against real major league hitters, not guys from the Netherlands or in the minors."

He's better than Tim Redding, and Fernando Nieve, and Russ Ortiz, and Bruce Chen, and Jon Garland, and a plethora of other guys who have rotation spots in MLB right now.

"He's better than Tim Redding, and Fernando Nieve, and Russ Ortiz, and Bruce Chen, and Jon Garland, and a plethora of other guys who have rotation spots in MLB right now."

Isn't that absolutely freaking insane that Garland got $6.25M from Arizona, along with a $10M option for 2010 that will cost the Diamondbacks $2.5M to decline.

$8.75M for a pitcher that I said was one of the most overrated players in the game, someone who may not belong in the majors for much longer. And look at him now.

You could see Garland's decline coming when he was pitching in Chicago, and it's become more and more obvious over the past two years.

"He's better than Tim Redding, and Fernando Nieve, and Russ Ortiz, and Bruce Chen, and Jon Garland, and a plethora of other guys who have rotation spots in MLB right now."

That's not saying much. In fact, that's not saying anything at all. I would rather those guys over Pedro since you're going to get the same production and they're not brittle.

"He's better than Tim Redding, and Fernando Nieve, and Russ Ortiz, and Bruce Chen, and Jon Garland, and a plethora of other guys who have rotation spots in MLB right now."

Well, here's the thing, there's absolutely no evidence that the above statement is true. I would be very surprised if Pedro were capable of putting a sub-5 ERA together, even in the NL. I don't have near the amount of information the Phillies do, and maybe this actually turns out to be a good baseball decision, but I think letting the kids play is probably a better decision than turning to an old, oft-injured, shell of his former self, fly ball pitcher with diminished velocity in a band-box of a ballpark.

scribbletone,


you're gonna hate on me for this because it has nothing to do with numbers. just a feeling i have.

remember i had the same feeling last year around this time when i made up the screenname i have now.

The giants scare me. The dodgers need to do it in a big spot to prove it to me.

If the season ended today the phils would play the Giants in the NLDS and the Dodgers would play the Cards. That first round game scares me more than the second.

Against us, the dodgers rotation was better last year with Lowe than it is this year with Wolf. Again no one hit in that LCS but Manny. Maybe they prove me wrong and figure out how to hit in the clutch this year???


And i don't think it should be the fans or the manager's hands. My vote is for analysts. Give a vote to a writer for each team and a single broadcaster on each team and make a stipulation they can't vote for their own guys. Then you'll get what's fair.

"Again if Kemp had a problem with it maybe he should have gotten an RBI in the NLCS last year and if he wants to blame one single individual other than himself, it should be Broxton because Matt Stairs' homerun was the killer of that series and everyone knew what was coming."

Come on kid. This is a joke. You are WAYYYYYY better then that phils.

Posted by: nrmax88 | July 13, 2009 at 01:47 PM


haha. I'm not that much better than that but the point is that there have been years that the Phils starters haven't gotten in but deserved to and I wasn't biatching and complaining. Its the system. And it needs to be fixed.

Personally i'd rather have had Howard and others snubbed and be ticked off about it and take it out on the Marlins to start the 2nd half.

"The giants scare me. The dodgers need to do it in a big spot to prove it to me."

But the Dodgers are the ones that absolutely dominated the best team in the NL during the regular season last year, the Cubs, and the vaunted Lincecum/Cain duo has never thrown a pitch in the postseason.

When it comes down to it, the differences between their pitching staffs isn't nearly as much as the difference between the stacked LA lineup and San Francisco's lacking offense.

I just think that you're vastly overrating their rotation, which is great, but not special, which is the vibe that I'm getting from your comments.

scribbletone,

oh come on now it was THE CUBS.

Also the cubs bats played right into the Dodgers hands (ie lefty/lefty)and mentally that team and city once it gets down has assumed they'll lose. Now that my team has won again I'm truly rooting for them to get off the 'schneid (sp) but I'll believe it when it happens which I assume is what many Cubs fans believe too.

As far as my reasons for liking the Giants over the Dodgers I also don't have that much faith in Broxton in a big spot if you must know. Not that i have more faith in Wilson but I also think you could easily see complete games in the NL playoffs by the Giants this year if they get there.

(on and don't let 55saveslives hear me talking good about the Giants. he may fall off his chair).

Do the Giants need more offense absolutely they do. But with Sandoval doing well and Rowand, Winn and Molina if they got another bat (Dye, Uggla) I would be a lot more worried about them than the Dodgers.

Ya the dodgers dominated the cubs but then an average rotation (with Hamels pitching lights out) and a solid bullpen totally shut them down. The ONLY ONE that hit was Manny and the Phils pitchers were totally in the Dodgers heads.


Again just one fan's opinion.

The second half of last year has to count for something in All Star decisions.

(After all, fan balloting began on April 22nd. What were those people who voted early in the year supposed to base their decisions on? Three weeks worth of stats?)

Since the last All Star game:

Howard 42 homers, 129 RBI, 96 runs

Werth 32 homers, 87 RBI, 101 runs

Sandoval 18 homers, 79 RBI, 65 runs

Congrats on three great months, Pablo. Keep it up and there will be All Star appearances in your future. Meanwhile, please, please, please ask your fans to quit their whining.


Who cares obviously the All Star game is a joke, as you mentioned fan balloting three weeks into the season...the fact that fans vote at all if just plain idiocy and further tarnishes what once was a rather prestigious honor of getting selected to the All Star game.

gophils,

good points but again Sandoval wasn't around much last year only coming up mid to late August.

Again who gives a crap about an ASG appearance.

What should matter is the playoffs and WS. Get there and do some damage there and everyone will forget about the All Star game.


Oh and there weren't times when Giants got it and didn't deserve it??? I highly doubt it.

*****BREAKING NEWS*********
Pedro Martinez took a piss and left the bathroom without washing his hands!

NM wrote, "i love this pickup.. phillies are complete idiots"

trusting their so-called "baseball people" who've seen Pedro with their own eyes instead of trusting the judgment of a genius like you?

Wow, they really are idiots. No wonder they never win anything.


NM wrote, "i love this pickup.. phillies are complete idiots"

trusting their so-called "baseball people" who've seen Pedro with their own eyes instead of trusting the judgment of a genius like you?

Wow, they really are idiots. No wonder they never win anything.


Why is it that people are too lazy to realize that Pedro's "diminished" velocity was the same velocity he was throwing with in 2005 when he was the best pitcher in the NL? He is an injury risk, sure, but there is no reason to think that if healthy Pedro can't still help somebody. He had plus breaking pitches and a nice changeup last year, he just missed a lot out over the plate because he hadn't pitched in a year. Stuff wise, he is the same guy as he was in 2005.

"Congrats on three great months, Pablo. Keep it up and there will be All Star appearances in your future. Meanwhile, please, please, please ask your fans to quit their whining."

It is the 2009 all star game. Not the 2008 second half game. Besides, the stats you used to prove your point mean nothing, aside from the homeruns. Matt Kemp has been worth almost as much as Shane and Werth put together this year. He really got snubbed. Kemp really should be a legit MVP candidate. He is 4th in the major leagues in WAR behind Albert, Utley, and Zobrist (who also should be a real MVP candidate, in fact, right now, he is the AL MVP, he has been worth a full win more then Longoria, just to put it in perspective).

“Probably more of the fact that Manuel picked Howard and Werth, both who have absolutely no business whatsoever in the 2009 all star game.”

Why are you people arguing this?

Look, Werth had more votes then both Kemp and Panda – possibly combined. Werth received 834,910 to Kemp at 584,602. Although Kemp might be more deserving, we, the fans, didn’t vote that way.

Meanwhile, Howard was the #2 vote getter at First and 10th highest vote getter in the NL. Does he deserve to be there over others? Probably not. But again, we sure voted for him, so we must want to see him.

Obviously, both players have some business being there – we want them. Were there better choices, sure. But you cant argue if a couple guys we voted heavily for get the nod.

Suzy, you are the first person on here which I had thought had a rather intelligent subscriber base who seems to think fan voting is a good thing..

"Suzy, you are the first person on here which I had thought had a rather intelligent subscriber base who seems to think fan voting is a good thing.."

Well, then you may need to go back to school and freshen up on your reading comprehension. No where did I state fan voting is a good thing. I am saying, since it is here, you cant criticize too much when players we voted for get replacements spots over players we didnt vote for. If two players have both produced strong numbers, and the fans voted heavily for them, then we cant complain too much when they make it in.

Sandoval and Kemp both had their shot in two votes, and two times they came up short. If they were so deserving and people wanted to see them so bad, then why didnt more people vote for them? Werth and Howard received tons of votes, and giving the people what they asked for cant be considered that "wrong".

"Suzy, you are the first person on here which I had thought had a rather intelligent subscriber base who seems to think fan voting is a good thing.."

Well, then you may need to go back to school and freshen up on your reading comprehension. No where did I state fan voting is a good thing. I am saying, since it is here, you cant criticize too much when players we voted for get replacements spots over players we didnt vote for. If two players have both produced strong numbers, and the fans voted heavily for them, then we cant complain too much when they make it in.

Sandoval and Kemp both had their shot in two votes, and two times they came up short. If they were so deserving and people wanted to see them so bad, then why didnt more people vote for them? Werth and Howard received tons of votes, and giving the people what they asked for cant be considered that "wrong".

I'm sure that Charlie looked long and hard at those UZR and WAR stats when making his selections... lmfao...

Listen, the Giants were attrocious last year... There offense is horrible this year... Charlie is rewarding the world champions by picking his guys... He only has 5... The Sox had 8 or 9 on one team...

You guys need to understand that the symbolism and team comradorarie is not dead within the organizations... He rewarded the right guys because the right guys helped the organization win...

Anyone who doesn't understand that is a moron...

I mean why not sign him? Can he possibly do any worse than what we have gotten from Moyer or anyone in the 5 slot this year? If it doesn't work out it doesn't work out, but we don't risk losing anything if we sign him.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.