MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Jays And Reds Talked; No Rolen Deal Likely | Main | Yuniesky Betancourt Rumors »

Roy Halladay Rumors: Friday

For all of the Pedro Martinez rumorsRoy Halladay remains the best pitcher available. Here's the latest buzz surrounding the ace ace of a Jays team that's now fallen below .500:

  • The Rangers have enough money coming off the books in 2010 to afford Halladay then, so his 2009 salary could be the team's biggest obstacle, according to Jamey Newberg. If the Rangers can afford Halladay this year, Newberg says the Rangers could give up Neftali Feliz or Justin Smoak- not both- along with Taylor Teagarden and others. But Derek Holland and Martin Perez are untouchable for Newberg.
  • MLB.com's Todd Zolecki suspects that the Phillies would part with Jason Knapp, Dominic Brown or Kyle Drabek in the right deal if it meant adding Halladay.
  • He only spoke in general terms, but Cards GM John Mozeliak told Joe Strauss of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch "there is always a chance to do a deal."
  • Jim Donaldson of the Providence Journal doesn't think Halladay's worth the price for the Red Sox.


Comments

i dont even want halladay on the red sox. an injury prone 'what-if' guy? no thank you. I know hes the best, when healthy, but ill bet on a sure thing before the potential of 'what-if'

I would love to see Halladay on the Rangers, but not see them overpay. Give them a catcher and Holland, who is only a 5 inning guy anyway from games I have seen him in and another lower tier prospect if Toronto would do it.

It seems to me that in order for the Jays to get what they want, there is going to have to be a 3rd team involved. I just don't see any one team giving up what they want for him.

Since when is Halladay Injury prone?between this year and last year he just had 1 injury that he just came off off which was a mild groin pull. Before that he missed half a season once because the ball came off Mench's bat and broke Halladays leg. I mean wait of coarse he's injury prone...

The Jays are not in a good position if they are trying to unload the Wells Contract as well. Most teams can not afford Halladay for the rest of this year and next year plus Wells 100 million dollar contract.

The best deal for them would be to go to Philly,

trade Halladay and Wells for Victorino, Drabek and and a C prospect. They might not be getting a ton for Halladay but they shed 20 million a year off the books for the next 5 years without Wells.

Roy Halladay's innings pitched the last few years:

2002 - 239
2003 - 266
2004 - 133
2005 - 141 (line drive off shin)
2006 - 220
2007 - 225
2008 - 246

He missed time with a freak appendix situation a few years ago + a line drive off the shin.

How is that injury prone?

The first comment in this post is garbage.

i dont even want halladay on the red sox. an injury prone 'what-if' guy? no thank you. I know hes the best, when healthy, but ill bet on a sure thing before the potential of 'what-if'


----

You are clearly an idiot.

I think the Rangers would be the best fit for Halladay. They have a lot they can trade. Smoak, Teagarden, McCarthy and Marlon Byrd. Deal!

I think everyone on board will agree 04forever needs to never posts anything on the interwebs ever again.

i dont even want halladay on the red sox. an injury prone 'what-if' guy? no thank you. I know hes the best, when healthy, but ill bet on a sure thing before the potential of 'what-if'

Posted by: 04Forever | July 10, 2009 at 11:19 AM


Wow.

The reality should be if they can't unload the contract of Wells, then they need to settle for nothing less than what the A's got for Haren.

If it was the Rangers, I'd say

Smoak, Main, Teagarden, Borbon, Ramirez and Boscan

if Phillies

Taylor, Drabek, Donald, Marson and Savery

You may think it sounds crazy but this is honestly the 2nd best pitcher in baseball and both teams are reeling.

haha you know 04forever is one of those guys who thinks Josh Beckett is better then Halladay and would have to admit it if he was on the red sox. So he doesn't want to admit he's wrong.

i don't think that Halladay approves a trade to the rangers.

sorry i wouldn't trade both Drabek and Knapp in a deal for Halladay I'd put one of them in there (preferably Drabek if forced to choose between the two) and then fill it around with #17 prospect Dom Brown, Savery, Marson (playing lights out and may be called up if Ruiz did get injured last night) and Donald.

Those 5 should be enough.

Drabek, Brown, Savery, Marson Donald.


I'm not giving up two potential future aces for one while in effect handcuffing us for the future.

White Sox the wild card here.
Kenny can pull the trigger.
Fields,Anderson,Podera, and Richards for Doc, Wells and $.

"i don't think that Halladay approves a trade to the rangers."

That is interesting, but the Rangers could be a team where he would maybe want to negotiate an extension 1st?

You can call me insane also then Devamc, I would not trade Beckett for Halladay straight up either. Beckett is a legit ace also, without the wear and tear on his arm and also, Halladay is not his old self these last 2 games. Short term, Beckett has been dominant since early May and looks like his 2007 self again.

philsWSchamps, do you think Taylor would be acceptable in the place of Brown?

deeselig,

I think Taylor will be better than Brown. He's basically got the triple crown going in AA Eastern League right now. Brown may have a higher ceiling but I think Taylor will reach it where Brown may not.

Taylor had a game last week that he went 3-4 with 3 steals. and he's 6'6 250. That's something you don't find at all anywhere. He's also slugging around .600 and is not that far off of a comparison to Howard. I think if we could get Halladay that we extend him later on knowing we'll be using Howard's money because Taylor will be here to replace his production.

Don't get me wrong he won't replace his overall power production (ie # of HR's and RBI's) but he won't strike out nearly as much and he'll hit for a much higher average which I'd prefer kind of like Ryan's ROY year.


So in answer to your question I'd prefer to include Brown to Taylor and actually some will call me crazy but I'd strongly think about preferring Drabek to Knapp.

Whoa some of these comments need to be clarified!

You are calling (SAPP) a future acee, he is 19 years old. Great k/IP numbers but it may be a little early to call him an ace. Actually don't remember seeing him on any baseball prospect list so he probably is not a top 100 player.

I did not say in the 5 player deal, both KNAPP AND DRABEK name.

Also to say Marson is playing lights out, he is hitting 291 with 1 HR and 21 RBIs almost half way through the season. I need a larger sample of production that 2.5 weeks.

Now Brown and Taylor are hard to argue, but Taylor is 2 years older than him. A 24 year old kid in AA might be a little bit to swallow.

Halladay would be dumb not to approve a trade to the Rangers. They are a serious contender in their division and everyone knows they can hit.

"i dont even want halladay on the red sox. an injury prone 'what-if' guy? no thank you. I know hes the best, when healthy, but ill bet on a sure thing before the potential of 'what-if'"

Look...I agree that the Sox should not go after Halladay. It doesn't make sense to give up their top prospects for one guy that would just add to a rotation clog. While that is never a bad thing, you'd be giving up a ton of prospects to build an excess.

However, Halladay injury prone? LoL. No. His injuries have usually been freak accidents (eg: Mench's bat hitting him). Halladay is a basic lock for over 200 IP, usually even around tops in the league.

While I would love for the White Sox to get him, I don't think they can pull it off without devastating their (thin) system. Else, they should have kept Brandon Allen and included him.

Maybe Allen, Viceido or Flowers, Jordan Danks, Poreda would have done it? No way Fields/Anderson/Poreda/Richard for Halladay + Wells + cash gets anywhere, though yes the addition of Wells would mean less return. And I kinda like the idea of Wells with the White Sox.

I wonder if any receiving team would look to extend Halladay's contract as part of a trade (as the Red Sox did with Schilling). It would make sense for Halladay, since it is hard to imagine his value increasing over the next 18 months; also for the Blue Jays, because a team ought to be willing to part with more of the farm system for extra years of Halladay. Some teams (Rangers, Brewers) would probably prefer a short-term rental, but this could make sense for a wealthy team that looks to compete most years (Phillies, Angels -- or maybe the Cardinals?).

johns: no one was saying they should trade Beckett for Halladay straight up. Just that Halladay is really the better pitcher...and the numbers do support that.

TheJonathan: I think thats prob one too many prospects for the Rnagers but a pretty fair deal. (though i find it hard to believe they'd part with both Smoak and Borbon in the same deal). I think it is pretty fair value.

Rockford: Fields and Anderson are terrible and would have no interest to the Jays. Poreda isn't "ace" material and neither is Richards so there is no star prospect. I think Beckham would have to be included as well as Poreda, Richard, and 3 other prospects.

Wow, Rangers getting Halladay, that would make their team just scary.

Though, that said, i think Texas realizes that they will never be able to sign an ace in free agency, so their only chance will be to trade for one or grow one.

Smoak, Teagarden, and Holland plus a longshot prospect would be a great return, but i can totally see Texas holding on to their guys and failing to contend for the next 5 years as well.

Would probably have had to include Dexter Carter or Daniel Hudson as well.

Thanks philsWS. I've been looking into Taylor & he certainly does seem impressive.

As for Drabek / Knapp, I've heard wonderful things about Knapp but I understand he's much younger(?)/ further away. Obviously I have no 1st hand knowledge but I would imagine that Drabek being further along in his development would be attractive in a Halladay trade. Don't know if thats sound thinking but uhh..yeah!

Yes the Rangers can win the division with Halladay, but can they go beyond that? The Rangers with Halladay I'm still not sure they get past the first round in the playoffs.

the Jonathan,

a potential future ace i believe is what i said. I've seen him 3 times in person and he at the end of one of his games he was hitting 96 on the gun with very good movement still. And technically he's still 18 for a bit and has done good enough that he should have been promoted to High A already.

Actually if you check the BA midseason report he was listed as in the top 50 although they didn't rank 26-50.

how about this. Marson is playing as lights out as Lars Anderson was doing for a while. In June he hit .313 and so far in July he's hitting .440 Again i'm not saying Marson is the centerpiece to the deal but more than just filler too.

I don't care much about age to be honest with you. Taylor has raked at every level he's been at and if he starts in the majors at 25 or 26 as I believe Utley and Howard did can you argue with their production becuase they started when they were older? Now I'm not saying Taylor will produce as much as Utley and Howard have but which would you rather have a productive player at 25-26 or a struggling player for 4 years at age 22 and then you lose him to FA when he's 29 so he goes then and plays for the Yankees or Red Sox? I'd rather give them the 34 year old Ryan Howard than the 29 year old version.

I see the Rangers including Feliz, Teagarden, Harrison, and Beltre in the trade.

They get two prospects who have all-star potential in Feliz and Beltre (he's really a boom or bust case).

They get two players who can fill the roster right now. Marrison's future is probably a #3 start that eats up innings. Teagarden could end up being the best defensive catcher in the game.

I don't see the Rangers offering more than this. If they do, I think they're bidding against themselves.

As for the Rangers not having money. I don't know how much I buy that. Ticket sales and Merch. should jump higher. Also by getting Halladay the playoffs would seem to be very likely meaning the Rangers will get millions more in gate receipts (yeah I know you can't always count on it, but it seems like a safe bet).

Devmac, I honestly think with Halladay in the starting rotation that they could get past the first round. They just got done sweeping Tampa, they went in to take 2 out of 3 AT fenway. the only team in that division that they've struggled against is the Yankees, but with a Halladay-Millwood-Padilla 123 punch... I think they can get past the first round.

" no one was saying they should trade Beckett for Halladay straight up. Just that Halladay is really the better pitcher...and the numbers do support that."

Past numbers do, but wear and tear on arms is highly in favor of Beckett as is age.

You rarely see an ace traded for an ace and when you do, the results are very often disastrous for one team.. Case in point? How about Rcik Wise going to St. Louis in exchange for Steve Carlton to Philly in 1972. St. Louis got the rotten end of that ace trade.

I know the Mets are probably f*cked for 2009, but why not take a shot at Halladay, they probably would even have a decent chance to re-sign him.

Give them any two top prospects (one of holt, f-mart, flores), then 2-3 more prospects (niese, evans, kunz, etc)

"Beckett is a legit ace also, without the wear and tear on his arm and also, Halladay is not his old self these last 2 games"

Against TBay he pitched 7 strong with 8K's only giving up 3ER. Thats not bad. He's still recovering from a groin pull. If Halladay was on a team with the run producing power of Boston he would easily be a 15 game winner right now and have a better record then Beckett.

The big difference between Beckett and Halladay is that when Beckett is "not his old self" he can still win games with Boston's offense. Halladay has to be perfect everynight and often is.

Beckett on the BlueJays would be nothing more then a 500 pitcher. Halladay on the Red Sox, or Yankees for the matter, would be a Cy Young winner every year.

Match that with the fact that he throws 90 pitch complete games and you have a pitcher who will be healthy and dominant for a long time.

Hicks is contemplating selling the team, I don't see them adding that much payroll when the club is in a state of limbo. Too bad though, they have the perfect system to deal, a lot of depth and teams are always looking for catching. Start with Feliz-Teagardan or Max and go from there. I read earlier about Drabek and Knapp being potential aces?? Theres only like 8-10 true aces in baseball, most teams are scared of Drabek's makeup.

"Give them any two top prospects (one of holt, f-mart, flores), then 2-3 more prospects (niese, evans, kunz, etc)"

I can name about 10 teams that can put together a better package.

theJonathon wrote, "trade Halladay and Wells for Victorino, Drabek and and a C prospect. They might not be getting a ton for Halladay but they shed 20 million a year off the books for the next 5 years without Wells."

The Jays would unload the worst contract in Since when is Halladay Injury prone?baseball and get an all star center fielder and a top 25 pitching propsect? Not a prayer. Hallday either brings you a huge haul of talent or tremendous salary relief. No way he brings you both.

Devmac wrote, "Since when is Halladay Injury prone?"

Please don't get all facty on us, Devmac. Facts are fungible in Red Sox Nation. If 04Forever says Hallday is a "what-if guy," he must be a what-if guy.

Fisrt of all it's Happ. J A Happ, not Knapp. Jeez you call yourself baseball fans. The phils are not going to get rid of the top prospect in Drebek. Also HAPP is a good deal to throw him in with some others, no one will touch marson, he's not that good.
and another thing, Halladay better not waste his talent playing for the perenially sh*tty team like the Mets

I'm sorry gophils I forgot that old chinese saying. "when in question ask a Red Sox fan"

Drabek, Brown, Savery, Marson Donald.
Posted by: philsWSchamps |


As a Jays fan, that's pretty decent imo.

I agree Juiced tho I would rather Taylor myself then Brown.

I'm telling you, someone is reading my posts and offering them as their own (joking). However, I made a proposal yesterday and the writer Newberg sounds like he read it before writing this article.

Halladay for Padilla, Blalock, Smoak, Perez, Teagrden and Borbon. Padilla's and Blalock's remainsing salary for 09 would cancel out Halladay's 2009 prorated salary. Padilla has a 2010 buyout for next year ($1.75 mil) and Blalock's salary slot, collectivelly would be replaced by Halladay's $15 mil 2010 salary. So basically the Rangers would have $16 coming off the books for 2010 and they just use that to pay Halladay's salary next year.

By accepting Padilla and Blalock in a trade for this year the Jays won't save any money from the Halladay trade this year but they get a much better prospect package and the money comes off the books at the end of this season thus saving them $15 mil in 2010.

Agree too.

The above is just like an NBA style trade including expiring contracts for good talent.

No thanks.

Fisrt of all it's Happ. J A Happ, not Knapp. Jeez you call yourself baseball fans. The phils are not going to get rid of the top prospect in Drebek. Also HAPP is a good deal to throw him in with some others, no one will touch marson, he's not that good.
and another thing, Halladay better not waste his talent playing for the perenially sh*tty team like the Mets

Posted by: Ched | July 10, 2009 at 12:34 PM


two different players there pal. There's JA Happ (currently playing for the ML club and Jason Knapp last year's 2nd round pick I believe that is around the league leaders of the SAL in strikeouts and should be in Clearwater already but for some strange reason they promoted Tyler Cloyd instead of KNAPP.

sounds useless, not a fan of the knapp character

lol Ched looks like an idiot.

I agree Juiced tho I would rather Taylor myself then Brown.

Posted by: Devmac | July 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM

so would I so Ruben better not screw it up and include taylor instead of Brown in any package he offers.

As a phils fan my choice would be:

-Drabek, Brown, Marson, Donald Savery

second best:

Knapp, Brown, Marson, Donald Savery

worst choice (ruben if you do this we'll hunt you down like the dog you are:

Knapp, Taylor, Marson, Donald, Savery.

sounds useless, not a fan of the knapp character


Posted by: Ched | July 10, 2009 at 12:47 PM

ya who needs 18 year olds that throw 96 with good movement and already have average secondary pitches.


Ched are you a mets fan in disguise??

Hopefully the phils sign who they need to. A solid starter like Halladay and a rested and back to normal Pedro. The Pedro that took and helped the RedStinks to a world series victorty. Not the Pedro that played for the mets. you know it's amazing. The Mets garbble up all this talent and nothing comes of it ever. Look at Putz, and he really is a putz. Was amazing, then gets hurt 1/4 the way through the season. Queens NY. What a dump. The place where talent goes to die,

never a mets fan, just not that well informed of the phils farm system,outside of the iron pigs sorry about the happ, knapp mix-up.

amaro has already said that the 3 "least touchable" players are brown, drabek and knapp. because of this, it is almost certain that he wont include more than 1 in a deal for halladay. he would possibly include taylor though.

Who is this Brown and Taylor that everyone is buzzin about

BaseBallz~
"Smoak, Teagarden, and Holland plus a longshot prospect would be a great return, but i can totally see Texas holding on to their guys and failing to contend for the next 5 years as well."

How in the world could you say the Rangers won't contend for the next 5 years??!? I'm pretty sure that they are contending now WITHOUT Halladay! WOW...
I may be the only one on here who could care less if the Rangers get Halladay. That is how much faith we have in guys like Smoak, Holland, Feliz, Main, and Perez.

To say the Rangers aren't going to contend in five years... just WOW.

If the Jays are willing to take this trade I say do this: Borbon, Teagarden, Beavan, Main, and Ross.

Jays get a ready catcher, a near ready CF to replace Wells or Rios (who ever they dump), two close pitchers in Beavan and Main who project to be great #2's if not #1's.

Of Course everyone is going to say a deal has to start with smoak, holland, or feliz... ACTUALLY it doesn't have to. The Rangers have the best farm system in baseball. That means the Rangers number 4-10 prospects could easily be number ones in many other team's farm system. There was an article about this a long time ago. Just because you have the best farm system doesn't mean the Rangers have to cough up their 1-3 guys...

amaro has already said that the 3 "least touchable" players are brown, drabek and knapp. because of this, it is almost certain that he wont include more than 1 in a deal for halladay. he would possibly include taylor though.

Posted by: mooNy

---

And the Jays have said, you better not mention the word 'untouchable' lol.

Who is this Brown and Taylor that everyone is buzzin about


Posted by: Ched | July 10, 2009 at 12:55 PM

oh ched. ok here you go.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=OF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=446345


and here's Brown.

http://web.minorleaguebaseball.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?pos=OF&sid=milb&t=p_pbp&pid=502126

They were just both ranked in the top 25 of midseason players in all of MILB.

The Rangers don't need Halladay, he has not pitched very well at the Ballpark...he would have to pitch their 16 times a year... I would like to see them go after Justin Verlander, Zack Grienke, or Dan Haren with a good package of players.

Let me add this...

If I am John Daniels of the Rangers I tell the Jays they can have their pick of 3 pitchers and 2 position players not named: Smoak, Davis, Feliz, Holland, and Perez.

The Jays and any other team in the league would nut themselves at having free pick at names like Borbon, Main, Beavan, Kiker, Ross, Beltre, Ramirez, Teagarden, Boscan, etc etc etc...

Thanks philsWSchamps. There lines look great, how old is the kid on the Thrashers, looks fresh outta high school

and i would trade one of them and Happ, plus cash to get Halladay

ROFL
Wake up.

dominic brown is 21 and taylor is 23

OMG i can't, can I?

Oh crap I'm a phillies fan yes i can!!

they actually include their dates of birth on the page there. He'll be 22 in September.

I agree with you Rangervoice...but I would only offer two pitchers and two position players. But I would try to pry a younger dominate pitcher as in Verlander or Grienke.

You'd hear a laugh, then a dial tone.

i don't think the Jays will except minors, i believe they will need a major leaguer also in the deal and i like Happ. what the hell throw kendrick in the deal as a gimmie

i don't think the Jays will except minors, i believe they will need a major leaguer also in the deal and i like Happ. what the hell throw kendrick in the deal as a gimmie

Posted by: Ched | July 10, 2009 at 01:14 PM

well crap for that let's give em Eaton and Jenkins too, we're still paying them right! If we're gonna be stupid let's go all the way to imbecile.

HAHA i love it.

The last time I looked Detroit was almost at the bottom in minor league talent...they don't have enough talent to beat the Redsox, Yankee's, or the Ray's. The Royals have several holes and not enough budget.

juiced and others,

my apologies. they obviously don't have IQ tests at the corner of Broad and Pattison to get into CBP.

I think that the Phillies have the best shot in getting him. They are the closest in going to the big dance...again...

seriously
Happ, Taylor, Curasco, and Marson, and Donald. Mix and match them with some cash, should land Halladay, you think?

theres no cash

I think that it would do it. I don't see Toronto being able to afford Halladay in the future.

Ched, you tried to make fun of us 'baseball fans', and you are suggesting sending over CASH to the Jays?
You are pretty clueless.

I bet the Phillies would mortgage their children, if they could win another World Series...

If the Jays trade with the Rangers i would hope Smoak would be the centerpiece. We almost have too much starting pitching, with a whole rotation on the DL.

Smoak though would be a great piece, and i think Rangers voice is right - aside from their top four guys (Smoak included in those) the rangers farm is pretty awesome.

Smoak and any two/three of (Borbon, Main, Beavan, Kiker, Ross, Beltre, Ramirez, Teagarden, Boscan) plus the usually filler guys that trades include would be an awesome return.

Smoak, Main and Beltre plus some infield prospect would be a pretty good return and who knows if the Phils would try and beat that. I'd think JP would need someone like Teagarden in there as well though since he's a more well known prospect so as to sell this to the fans as a definite step forward for the franchise.

I think that the trade would center around one of their two catchers. Smoak is being primed to take over first base in the next month or two. A good switch hitting first baseman, reminds me of someone.

The Jays and any other team in the league would nut themselves at having free pick at names like Borbon, Main, Beavan, Kiker, Ross, Beltre, Ramirez, Teagarden, Boscan, etc etc etc...

Posted by: rangersvoice | July 10, 2009 at 01:05 PM
--------------

Not much of an offering here:

I like Teagarden and Borbon and included both in my package but Teagarden's bat is still questionable and Borbon profiles as a good CF w/ speed and not a high impact type player.

Boscan and Kiker are B level prospect.

The other guys...???

Ross the 2nd rnd pick out of HS who's only pitched 4 games of minor league baseball in SS A ball? Wayyyy to early to rate him.

Ramirez, the 24 yr old who's hitting .238/.308 @ AAA?

Main w/ the 7.33 ERA in 54 IP @ high A?

Beltre, the guy hitting .220/.272 who almost has more strikeouts (72) than hits (74) @ high A?

Beavan with the 5.65 ERA @ AA?

The Jays, I would think, are looking for more quality rather than quantity. 2 high end prospects (Smoak and Perez), an mlb ready C (Teagarden) and an additional solid prospect (Borbon) could get it done.

I think that the trade would center around one of their two catchers. Smoak is being primed to take over first base in the next month or two. A good switch hitting first baseman, reminds me of someone.

Posted by: Armando | July 10, 2009 at 01:36 PM

I don't know that he's Teixeira good if that's who you're referring to and I doubt he has his glove.

and with a name like Juiced i really hold your opinion near and dear to my heart. Take out the cash, problem solved

Yes, but you got to give a chance....this could turn out to be a Herschel Walker trade....

I really think that the Rangers need to wait another year...let the puppies grow...I can't see the Rangers beating the Yankees or Redsox..

First of WSCHAMPS, please do not tell me Marson is playing lights out in July. It would be similar to saying on July 2nd he went 4-4 on July 1st so he is raking in the month of July.

He has a sample of 7 games and prior to that supposed hitting success, he was hitting about .240 in the MONTH OF MAY AND APRIL.

Secondly, the jays are a team that is about to admit the 2009 season, may not work for them, BUT 2010 could be a year they can contend.

They have Lind, Snider, Rios, Hill, possibly Scutaro. Arencibia to catch a rotation of 20 something pitchers (romero, litsch, ,marcum, mcgowan, cecil and ritchmond) along with some guy i cant spell his last name. They are not looking to have a pitcher whom is 19 years old. This is not the Pirates or Nationals. They would want Drabek and only him, since he could be major league ready in a year.

Honestly Armando if the Tigers wanted to pull off this trade it would be very simple for them.

Halladay for Porcello, Iorg, and Jacobsen. DONE!

I agree with you Rangervoice...but I would only offer two pitchers and two position players. But I would try to pry a younger dominate pitcher as in Verlander or Grienke.

Posted by: Armando | July 10, 2009 at 01:11 PM
---------------

Hahaha....and the Tigers would trade their #1 starter because........????? Same question regarding Greinke...????? Greinke is signed at a below market rate of $9.5 mil thru 2012. Verlander is still under control for a few more years, is their #1 pitcher and the Tigers can afford to keep him if they want. Keep in mind that the only reason the Jays are dangling Halladay is because they question whether or not they can resign him after the 2010 season. The Tigers and ROyals don't have those concerns, at least not in the near future.

theJonathan,

now don't get testy now. What about Marson wasn't the centerpiece didn't you get? And you conveniently forgot about the month of June?

Fine, forget about Marson for now. I don't want to trade Knapp anyway, I think he has way more upside than Drabek.


If at the end of the day the phils don't make a deal for Halladay i'm fine with letting our prospects develop into stars. It worked for Utley, Howard, Hamels, Rollins etc so I have every faith that it will work for Taylor, Brown, Drabek, Knapp.

In fact as I said yesterday if you take out a bad start or two Knapp's stats are very comparable to Hamels while in Low A ball at this age. Again I'm not saying he's Hamels but if anyone considers him a "throw-in" they're mistaken.

I understand this YanksFan, but...you and I know that that Royals and Tigers need more talent. The Tigers have basically run out of talent at the farm...and they still can't beat the Yankees or Redsox. Most teams can only make a run at the Yankees or Redsox once or twice in about eight year period and hope that the ball bounces their way.

I think the only reason that most fans go out to see their teams play against the Redsox and Yankees...to see if the underdog can take down Goliath.

But truthfully, I think that the Jays are asking way to much for Halladay. They know that their are only a couple of teams willing to make that deal. If they get to greedy, they will have a fire sale next summer and probably get lot less for him.

I only see three teams that truly have enough talent to trade with the Jays, which are the Rangers, Phillies, and Redsox.

Maybe the Braves, but I don't know if they want him.

I guess, I'm talking to myself.

Why is no one picking up on the guy that has said to go after Greinke or Verlander?

Why the hell would their teams trade them?

Seriously. Why?

Oh, my bad, I didn't see that YanksFan did.

WSchamps,

I am not getting upset trust me. I am simply not going to let someone tell me that Lou Marson who is tied with Yovani Gallardo in HRs for the 2009 Season, is going to be anything less than the 3rd or 4th player off the list of Phillies Prospects.

Armando,

You should just know that anyone who has a Justin Smoak type elite level prospect can propose a trade for Halladay. Roy needs to approve it and so does J.P. but the Marlins can start with Stanton or Morrison, the Braves can start with Freeman, the Reds can start with Alonso, the Cubs can start with Vitters and so on.......

"I understand this YanksFan, but...you and I know that that Royals and Tigers need more talent. The Tigers have basically run out of talent at the farm...and they still can't beat the Yankees or Redsox. Most teams can only make a run at the Yankees or Redsox once or twice in about eight year period and hope that the ball bounces their way. "'

They will get there more talent through the draft rather than trading away their number 1 pitchers. Get a clue.

Yes, I understand..B3NG4L...but the time they get enough talent, they will be forced to trade..their #1 pitcher...lack of money...

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.