MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Nationals Notes: Manager, Desmond, Maxwell | Main | Free Agent Lefty Mashers »

Heyman On Jaramillo, Holliday, Mets, Nationals

11:24pm: Bruce Levine of ESPNChicago.com says the Cubs will announce the signing of Jaramillo tomorrow.  The Cubs paid up for the hitting coach's services - three years, $2.42MM.

6:01pm: SI.com's Jon Heyman discusses a variety of hot stove topics in his latest column and in an appearance on WFAN, which Matthew Cerrone of MetsBlog summarizes. Here are a few of Heyman's main points....

  • The Mets will be the main player for Matt Holliday, with the Giants and Braves in the mix as well. In addition to the Cardinals, the Red Sox and Yankees are also contenders for the star outfielder.
  • Rather than make a run at Roy Halladay, the Mets may be more inclined to sign free agents and keep their top prospects.
  • Intermin manager Jim Riggleman is the favorite to manage the Washington Nationals in 2010.
  • The Mariners' management is glad that Kenji Johjima opted out of his deal, since they "never thought much of him as a player."  That's Heyman's quote, not anything from the team.
  • Rudy Jaramillo, who seems likely to become the Cubs' hitting coach, has had success working with Alfonso Soriano in the past. Heyman hears that Jaramillo will sign a multi-year deal with Chicago that will make him the highest-paid hitting coach in the league.


Comments

Holliday to the Braves would be sweet.

unless Holliday falls in love with Atlanta and takes a big discount I don't see it happening.

The only way the Braves could do it would be to trade Lowe away as a salary dump. But I don't see it happening either.

Wren must be pretty confident that he can move Lowe's salary if he thinks we can go get Holliday. I realize this isn't him saying it but if Lowe gets moved then all of a sudden we have more than enough to go get Holliday.

An outfield of Holliday, McLouth, and Heyward is nice to dream about.

Yeah, I don't think that Holliday makes the most sense considering that they already have Heyward, McLouth, Schafer and Diaz already in the upper minors or on the ML roster.

"Rudy Jaramillo, who seems likely to become the Cubs' hitting coach, has had success working with Alfonso Soriano in the past."

This really confuses me. Success?

NYY wOBAs: .378, .371
TEX wOBAs: .345, .356
WAS wOBAs: .377
CHC wOBAs: .380, .374, .314

Other than his horrid 2009 campaign, Soriano was clearly a worse hitter in Texas than anywhere else, in spite playing half of his games in a hitter's park.

Who was his coach during his time in Texas? Rudy Jaramillo.

The guy that Chicago hires to fix Soriano? Yep, the same guy that coached him during his worst two years since becoming a star, Rudy Jaramillo.

Another odd move for Hendry and company, although I'll acknowledge that adding Jaramillo likely won't hurt.

If Brian Sabean is interested there must be something horribly wrong with Holliday. I don't know what it is, but no one can (not)pick them like Brian.

While I would love for Holliday to come to ATL, I just don't see it as a realistic option. We would have to compete with payrolls like the Mets, Yankees, and Red Sox. The Cardinals probably have the head-start, and I think Holliday wants to stay with them. So all these teams have the advantage over the Braves, even if we do dump Lowe's contract (which seems unlikely).

I think signing Matt Holliday should be the Mets top priority than signing a pitcher like Jason Marquis because...

1.) No Met fan wants Cory Sullivan or Daniel Murphy out in left in 2010.

2.) Jason Marquis only had one great season in his ML career, and if the Mets pick him over Holliday, than I believe the Mets are screwed once again. I think Marquis would be a great pickup for the Mets, but Holliday is way better. Plus the Mets will have Johan back for 2010.

3.) Holliday and Wright or Beltran would be a nice #3 & 4 guy for the Mets lineup.

After that is done, than the Mets should go get a starter like Marquis or even Lackey.

"1.) No Met fan wants Cory Sullivan or Daniel Murphy out in left in 2010."

I don't even want Murphy starting at 1st Base. I rather they bring Delgado back on a 1yr incentive based contract. Murphy just isnt that good. I'm tired of hearing what he should or may do..i just want a player that does and has a history of doing it.

Personally I think Holliday will be a Met in the end.

Im just afraid that while the Mets are in desperate need of a real #2 starter, they will go out and get Jason Marquis who is a #5 at best in my eyes.

Lackey and Holliday are both priorities if they wanna be contenders.

Braves don't have to move Lowe in order to sign Holliday. But if they did, they wouldn't have enough to sign LaRoche and fill the bench and bullpen needs. While the Mets might sign Lackey or Holliday, I HIGHLY doubt they sign both. If I were them, I'd go with Lackey...

Mets should sign Holliday and Lackey. Murphy is the 2nd basemen of the future for the Mets. He should be turned into a bench player til Castillo's contract is up, and then he'll take over the 2B job. Maybe he should be sent back to the minors to work on learning the position. I think a good, cheap option at first is Hank Blalock: he's relatively young and has some serious power. A move to the NL could only help his miserable OBP. Mets should also get Eric Hinske for the bench and resign Alex Cora as a utility infielder.

Thoughts?

Tender Frenchy and Pagan a contract 2.

Moses Magnum, I agree with you that Murphy shouldn't even play 1st or other positions until he developes, but I was just talking about him playing left field would be a bad thing, I didn't metion anything about first in my previous comment

I would say Murphy and newly acquired Chris Carter will battle for 1B next season for the Mets.

About the only reason to trade Wagner for Carter was if they intended to use him, like the salary was all that important to the Mets.
Between the two, the Mets could probably get something of value. And then its getting people healthy and most importantly get some fire, get something going in that clubhouse.

Yeah, I don't think that Holliday makes the most sense considering that they already have Heyward, McLouth, Schafer and Diaz already in the upper minors or on the ML roster.


Posted by: scribbletone | October 20, 2009 at 06:20 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------

I would agree except that the Braves have already said that they plan to heavily pursue a right handed, power hitting left fielder for next season. If both Schafer and Heyward live up to all of their promise then one of Schafer or McLouth could be traded in a couple of years.

I'm not a Mets fan but they should concentrate on fixing their rotation this winter. After Santana its not good. Resigning Perez was a mistake. They should go all in to get Lackey. Signing him would give them one of the best 1-2 starters in the NL. Their offense will be better just by getting players healthy. Beltran only played in 81 games this year, Reyes only played in 36 games and Wright only played in 144 games. Having all of them healthy will fix the offense.
Plus they won't be able to sign both Holliday and Lackey. It would cost around $180 million for both.

i see holiday ending up on the mets anyway ... but i really think a lot of it depends on if the yankees win the world series.. if they do, they will have a lot less pressure to sign an all star caliber left fielder ..

the mets have a lot of holes, but i think holiday solidifies left field for years to come, a position that has given the mets problems for years now

The Yankees getting Holliday depends on them winning the World Series. If they lose its a given, if they win ... they also get him. Thats right ... i think the Yankees lock up Matt Holliday as his power numbers in Yankee stadium will be greater regardless of the AL pitching. Holliday can mash with enough protection and a chance to play for a winning ball club with a grooving chemistry is one all players want.
However the Mets do need a LF and i see them getting Jason Bay. We have heard nothing on the Bay and Red Sox talk .. in my opinion they let him go and pursue an outfielder via trade, one like Jayson Werth or Corey Hart for example.
Reyes
Hudson
Beltran
Bay
Wright
Is a nasty 1-5 for the Mets

jtd, totally agree. There is absolutely no way they can lock up the biggest hitter on the market AND the biggest pitcher on the market. Maybe Marquis, but Lackey would be out if the question if they sign Holliday. They should definetly focus on pitching, as they have a great offensive team already, even with the holes. I think Lackey and Nady would be their best bet, maybe even Marquis if they want to go all out.

LF has been their biggest hole since cliff floyd had his career year in 05. Even if it doesnt mean being a contender right away in 10, which they will be, it will at least fill a hole for at least the next 5 years. If they get Holliday, then i would sign Marquis, move Maine to the pen and trade for Guthrie and garko and call it an offseason. Mets Roster for 10

1. Reyes SS
2. Castillo 2b
3. Holliday LF
4. Beltran CF
5. Wright 3B
6. Francouer RF
7. Garko/Murphy 1b
8 Thole/Santos

SP:
1. Santana
2. Marquis
3. Guthrie
4. Pelfrey
5. Ollie

The Cubs are going to get Jaramillo. Big deal. I haven't heard anything great about him, so why are we paying so much money for him?

Once they are done with this, how about they get to things that will really improve this team, like:
1. Sign Mark DeRosa
2. Trade for Adam Dunn
3. Re-sign Reed Johnson
4. Trade Bradley for Oliver Perez
5. Trade for Kerry Wood
6. Hire Sandberg as manager
7. Hire Stone as President
8. Hire a new GM
9. Play players (like Fox) who deserve to play

If the Mariners' management "never thought much of [Johjima] as a player," why did they sign off on giving him a contract extension?

If you ask me, that comment says more about the ineptitude of Seattle's front office than it is an indictment of Johjima as a player. They went out and got him. They signed him to (or signed off on giving him) a contract extension. That doesn't sound to me like "they never thought much of him as a player" to me.

sign holliday and delgado leaving murphy, pagan, and sullivan to be our bench which isnt too bad. singing holliday will take us out of the john lackey race but seeing how marquis' goal is to sign specifically with the mets maybe we can get him for a discount. left field, innings eater (but not #2 starter quality), power, and bench depth is solved. i doubt the mets will be plagued with the amount of injuries they were last season. if this all happens i tihnk we might be ok for 2010. (even though we still dont have a catcher)

SS-Reyes
2B-Hudson
CF-Beltran
3B-Wright

*Thats more than enough offensive production 1-4 Mets have no need for Matt Holliday or Jason Bay, sign John Lakcey and go after DeRosa, Nady, Blalock, or the trade route ... Luke Scott, Ty Wiggington maybe from the Orioles in a trade for Guthrie?*

1B-Nady
LF-Scott
RF-Francoeur
C-Santos

Santana, Lackey, Guthrie, Pelfrey, Perez

and just because a player moves to the nl, especially the nl east, doesnt mean they are guaranteed to hit better. nl east is stacked with pitchers IE josh johnson, ricky nolasco, the entire ATL rotation, cliff lee, cole hamels, and now stephen strasburg (and santana if this player is not on the mets)

TNS - its been believed the extension to Johjima was forced upon the front office by ownership.

Freeside...

That is one of the most realistic outlooks i have seen personally thus far on the Mets 2010 outlook. Nicely done, i think u hit it right on the nose there. Realistic and definitely possible

Imagine John Maine a former oriole leaving, just to be replaced by another young Oriole pitcher in Jeremy Guthrie!

i belive the mets should go with bay which leaves us more money and we can get harden i think its chris carter at 1st murphy sucks

also bay could probably hit in citi field matt holliday would be a joke on the mets

this is just a question, you think the sox would deal buccholz and lester for johan?

no one freak out over it

ahahahahahaahhaa

poor rudy j,
it will all go bad in the toxic soup that is CubsLand
cubs think it will be the magic formula to justify the the millions plunked down on an erratic hitter who may be the worst defensive player in the major leagues

this is just a question, you think the sox would deal buccholz and lester for johan?

Posted by: clos79 | October 20, 2009 at 10:05 PM

This is just an answer:
No

1B - LaRoche
2B - Prado
3B - Chipper
SS - Yunel
LF - Holliday
CF - Schafer/McLouth
RF - Diaz/Heyward/Church
C - McCann

SP - Vazquez
SP - Hudson
SP - Jurrjens
SP - Hanson
SP - Kawakami/Medlen

DROOL!

You may say I'm a dreamer.
But I'm not the only one!

I would really hate to see the Mets waste money on Marquis. Just because he had a miracle 1st half and went back to his normal self in the 2nd, is no reason to sign another Ollie Perez like deal. Take Derek Lowe off of the Braves hands for a nobody if the Mts want a fair pitcher at least they will get somebody that will have a chance to be good at Citi Field and then make a pitch for either Holliday, or Bay if the Mets have some spare change, but can't see the loyal fan base stomaching another dead FA signee and marquis is just that.

Lowe to the Mets makes sense for them, but it probably makes more sense for the Braves. Any time you're helping a division rival more than yourself, it's usually not a great idea. Then again, you're talking about the GM who traded a semi-useful piece for Jeff Francoeur.

I was not the biggest fan of pursueing Holliday. Still think the money can be better spent on some shrewd lower budget impact bats and pitching depth. The more I think about it, as long as it's not a completely unreasonable deal, a 3-4-5 of Wright, Beltran, Holiday (not sure the order) would look pretty good.

i think the mets would be smart to try to get both aaron harang and bronson arroyo. they are both fly ball pitchers who could be very good at city field. then if they get holiday they would have a pretty high powered offence.

"If the Mariners' management "never thought much of [Johjima] as a player," why did they sign off on giving him a contract extension?

If you ask me, that comment says more about the ineptitude of Seattle's front office than it is an indictment of Johjima as a player. They went out and got him. They signed him to (or signed off on giving him) a contract extension. That doesn't sound to me like "they never thought much of him as a player" to me."
_________________________________

TNS, Johjima was signed in April, 2008. The current GM, Zduriencik, was not hired until October, 2008. It is a mistake to evaluate the current administration by decisions made during the previous one.

The phrase "never thought much of him as a player" most likely refers to the attitude of Zduriencik and his administration, not the previous management team.

I think many analysts considered the Bavasi administration, and the interim team also, as inept, but they are gone. The new group appears exceptionally capable.

Wow, can't believe there has been this many posts about a hitting coach. You would think it would be mentioned on a cubs website maybe once. But to have follow up posts on it on this website is a joke.

G13,

That's a ridiculous thing to say. Getting a guy like Jaramillo is a pretty big deal. Nobody else seems to have a problem with it; it's actually sparking discussion. It is not, by any means, a 'joke'.

Holliday to the Mets is a perfect fit, and they can afford the legacy contract he's probably looking for. Harang would be a great fit as a #2 behind Santana in that stadium, but I don't think the Mets have the chips to get him from the Reds even though the Reds might be interested in dumping the contract.

Cardinal's front office said they'll do whatever it takes to sign Holliday, and they have the window of time to do it before he hits the open market. I'm pretty confident he'll get a competitive offer from them, so saying he's more likely to sign with 3 other teams is a bit far-fetched.

"Cardinal's front office said they'll do whatever it takes to sign Holliday, and they have the window of time to do it before he hits the open market. I'm pretty confident he'll get a competitive offer from them, so saying he's more likely to sign with 3 other teams is a bit far-fetched."

Not when Holliday has already turned down a 5/90 offer from St. Louis, which is getting close to the upper-end of his legitimate open market value. If the bidding starts closing in on 6/120+, then the Cardinals should really just begin to look into alternatives.

"Harang would be a great fit as a #2 behind Santana in that stadium, but I don't think the Mets have the chips to get him from the Reds even though the Reds might be interested in dumping the contract."

If the Mets are willing to eat Harang's entire remaining contract, both his $12M salary for 2010 and his $2M buyout for 2011, then it shouldn't cost the Mets that much talent to land him.

The Mariners "never thought much of [Johjima] as a player"? Why in the world did they extend him then?

Quick note: not that I thought much of Johjima either.

Where did those OBP% for Soriano in the beginning of these posts come from? Does a Holliday signing for the Mets lead to them Dealing FMart for a young promisng arm?

First thing is for the mets is Health and conditioning. Second thing is finding a bench coach with managerial experience (ie Manny Acta etc.) to be the yin to Manuel's lack of stragey yang. Yes it's true anyone can steer the ship with enough talent to win, but let's not forget the titanic looked great on paper, as did the 1992 Mets. Now for the players, and first is pitching, which should be upgraded by both a trade and free agency. The best return without mortgaging the future is to trade "Problems for Problems". All be it talented problems. Heres one suggestion:

Mets Send:
O. Perez
Castillo
Francoeur(hate to see him go, but you have to give a little)

Cubs Send:
Zambrano
M. Bradley

Obviously the Cubs motivation would be to shed Salary and Bradley. Francoeur would be an upgrade defensively and character. The Mets would get a proven #2 starter and a talented but unpredictable Bradley. But Bradley plays into Manuel's strong suit which is player motivation. The Cubs would be shedding 7 mil in 2010, they'd break even in 2011 and they'd save 18 mil in 2012 the last year of Zambrano's deal.

Free Agency:
With Zambrano assuming Perez spot, the need for another starter should be filled by signing an afordable Randy Wolf or Ben Sheet's on an incentive driven deal once he demonstrates he's healthy to scouts. JJ Putz has a nearly 9 mil option which if he's healthy may be worth picking up, but that depends if ownership is truly unaffected by recent financial rumors. That 9 mil will be spent partially on a set up man in the Brandon Lyons mold. John Maine would round out the rotation but I'd like to see Omar bring in someone as insurance for Maine in the 5th spot. Even Pedro showed what he can accomplish when he has something to prove. What better stage for his final season then a chance to redeem himself from his lowest point, all be it at a bargin deal of maybe 1 mil. Even if he goes to the Bullpen, you know they'll be shoulder stiffness or some other unclear reason for a starter to take a seat. Wouldnt you prefer Pedro making a spot start or Nelson Figueroa. Think about it.

I would venture to say that signing Holliday would not be a bad signing because he fits the most obvious need in LF. He's proven his effectiveness outside of Coors and unless the asking price is unrealistic, which it may be, then just go with Mets Prospect Jason Bay. But there other directions to go. Move Bradley to LF and sign a RF such as Abreu or Vlady. But Holliday is the safe healthy move at about 15 - 17 mil a year.

That said, with Castillo gone it opens the door for Orlando Hudson, who is made for Citi field as a switch hitter with gap to gap power and above avg speed.

1st Base: Realistically, there is only so much money and it would be great to sign Nick Johnson or Blalock, but more likely is to sign a right handed compliment to Murphy, Nady who was originally a 1st baseman in the minors with the padres would be a cheap and proven alternative for Murphy at 1B. He played himself out of town in a good way in 2006 and may even win 1B exclusively if Murphy struggles, but as a platoon they should combine for .280ish 20+ HR 80+ RBI's. Nady is also a back up policy in the OF should we see any resemblence of 09 happen injury wise. If anything Omar may resign Delgado to a 1yr incentive contact and send Murphy to the AAA to work at 1st Base and other positions. He'll be a valuable asset at 25yrs old with impressive AAA stats come July 31st when the Padres and Rays are looking to dump Adrian Gonzalez and Carlos Pena respectively for some prospects in their walk years.

Cather: Obviously you have a short term and cheap solution is Pudge Rodriguez, a 1 yr deal in the 1 - 2 mil range. But if his age scares Omar then Benji Molina(36 next yr) would be an excellent upgrade both offensively and defensively.

-Here's how the team lines up:

Reyes
Hudson
Beltran
Holliday
Wright
Bradley
Murphy/Nady/Delgado
Rodriguez/Molina

Bench:
Pagan
Santos
Tatis
Murphy/Nady
A. Hernandez(you can live with him if Reyes is healthy)


Santana
Zambrano
Pelfrey
Wolf/Sheets
Maine or Pedro? loser to the bullpen?

KROD
Puttz/Lyons Etc.
Parnell
Feliciano
Misch
Stokes
Maine/Pedro Etc.

Of course a lot has to happen for any of this to happen, including avoiding Omar's tendency to reward players such as Jose Contraes who he perhaps scouted in their prime 15 years ago. The main focus should be on Health and Fundamentally sound baseball which comes from proper coaching. There's always suprises both good and bad, such as Johan 2 years ago. Thank you for entertaining my thoughts and in closing, Angel Pagan did play well enough to perhaps start for most teams, but after this past season, isnt it great to have him as a 4th option just in case.

Mets Send:
O. Perez
Castillo
Francoeur(hate to see him go, but you have to give a little)

Cubs Send:
Zambrano
M. Bradley

Posted by: VirtualGM | October 21, 2009 at 09:05 AM
-----------------------------------------------------------------

That would be a great deal......for the Mets. The Cubs would be giving up 2 very good players and getting nothing of value in return.

Jaramillo certainly won't hurt the Cubs, he can't be worse than what they've had in the past. I was optimistic about Von Joshua but that didn't turn out so well. Was it really his fault though? I just hope they aren't counting on Jaramillo to fix everything. I hope they also realize how good the offense was in '08 when their .obp was good and how poor it was in '09 when their .obp was bad. There's a lesson there if they're paying attention.

Monsterface - word is they extended him because ownership in Japan wanted him extended and upped the salary as well. The M's themselves probably wouldn't have done it, at least for that long or that much. Bavasi was GM at the time so I guess you never know.

NY Mets
-sign holliday
-sign delgado (1 year cheap deal only)
-trade for jeremy guthrie/gil meche/ervin santana
-sign marquis/chapman

reyes
castillo
beltran
holliday
wright
delgado
francoeur
santos/thole

santana
guthrie/meche/santana
chapman/marquis
pelfrey
perez/maine

we would have a nasty lineup and a pretty solid rotation..what would be even better would be to trade for halladay for the #2 spot but that prob wont happen

It's good to see everyone woke up, it's nearly noon, throw a little seriously thought out ideas and people go into a frenzy. Obviously as I stated this is Problems for Problems, there are no real losers. Zambrano has steadily declined in the past 3 seasons under sweet Lou, and Bradley and Sweet Lou, need I say more. Zambrano's contract is perhaps the worst contract in baseball at the moment. He is still owed $54 MIL over the next 3 seasons. Francoeur would be an upgrade at every level for the cubs over Bradley and he's owed 11 Mil next season. So if your following along thats $65 Mil the cubs would be dropping, and Perez, Castillo, and Francoeur combined over that period would cost 40 Mil. Baseball is a game, but Major League Baseball is a business, and as we saw when the Mets stole Johan, Money talks. If anything the trade will not happen because the Mets will not take on the additional $25 Mil in salary to 2 "Very good players" who have floundered under Sweet Lou. And Castillo's batting avg. was higher than Fontenot's OB%, and Castillo's OB% (.387) would have ranked him 3rd on the cubs last year. And no time spent discussing and debating baseball is ever wasted.

8. Hire a new GM - Because the one who has led us to 3 straight seasons above .500 is terrible? Let's see what Hendry can do, I still have faith.

Posted by: Bdlugz | October 21, 2009 at 10:03 AM

With that payroll, you'd better be able to field a team that can win at least 82 games.

"Zambrano has steadily declined in the past 3 seasons under sweet Lou"

Based on what, his FIP actually declining in each of the last two years to a very respectable 3.71 in 2009?

"Zambrano's contract is perhaps the worst contract in baseball at the moment. He is still owed $54 MIL over the next 3 seasons."

There are a lot worse contracts than Big Z's. Soriano, Zito, etc...

There are a lot worse contracts than Big Z's. Soriano, Zito, etc...

Posted by: vtadave | October 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM

Vernon Wells certainly comes to mind.

There are a lot worse contracts than Big Z's. Soriano, Zito, etc...

Posted by: vtadave | October 21, 2009 at 11:40 AM

Oliver Perez is certainly up there.

Heyman is probably being fed this crap by Boras. The Giants won't make a play for Holliday. They just don't have the money in the budget that they're likely to have, which should be about $90M.

One of the things that Omar has to avoid this offseason is to unnecessarily reward players with starting spots/big contracts coming off success in a small sample size. This is what got him last year. In 2008 Fernando Tatis had a monster 3 months and Daniel Murphy looked like the next Don Mattingly for 100 AB's. So Omar decided the tandem of those 2 would suffice for LF in 2009, because both would at least replicate what they did in '08 if not improve. But Fernando Tatis went back to being Fernando Tatis and all of a sudden pitchers realized that Murphy can't hit a slider. Because a guy has moderate success for a small sample size does not automatically make them worthy of a starting job or any sort of trust in getting the job done. The 2009 Tatis and Murphy are undoubtedly Jeff Francoeur and Omir Santos. Both players suck, but both will be rewarded with prominent spots on the roster. Francoeur should absolutely get traded now at the peak of what little value he has and Santos should maybe, MAYBE be a third catcher. Here's my offseason plan:

1. Sign Matt Holliday. Adds a big bat to middle of the lineup, a right handed gap splitter who should hit a ton of doubles at Citi, and a decent defensive OF who will man LF for several years.

2. Trade for Aaron Harang. I would bet that we could get him from Cincy relatively cheap if we eat the contract. He could have a lot of success at the cavernous Citi Field.

3. Sign Erik Bedard and Justin Duchscherer to a 1 year incentive laden deal. Both guys have very high upside and add quality rotation depth, not like last year when Omar added Livan and Tim Redding. Also they shouldn't cost too much coming off of injury/psychiactric leave of abscence.

4. Sign Gregg Zaun. Obviously Josh Thole is the catcher of the future and should be groomed as such. Zaun can basically keep the seat warm for Thole, with Thole getting some playing time in the process. Zaun would basically play the same role he did this year with Baltimore holding down the fort until Wieters arrived.

4. Sign Marlon Byrd. I would pencil in Fernando Martinez to play RF next season, but Marlon Byrd is a good insurance option because he is good enough to start should something happen but also can provide depth at all 3 OF positions.

5. Bring Delgado back on a 1 year deal with incentives. Why not? He could at least show some life this year. If not, we have Murphy and Chris Carter to step in.

6. Oliver Perez becomes the highest paid hot dog vendor in the league. He has absolutely no use to this team as a pitcher, we can't trade him, and we can't release him so why not have him be useful to the club in some capacity. Other ideas include having Mr. Met shoot him in the stomach point-blank with the T-shirt gun as part of the 7th inning stretch, sitting in a dunk tank out in CF and letting Met fans soak him for $1, or being one of the Citi Field photographers who bother you 20 times a game for a picture that NEVER end up on the website anyways. In any case, he should not be a pitcher in 2010.

2010 lineup:
C. Zaun/Thole
1B. Delgado/Murphy
2B. Castillo
3B. Wright
SS. Reyes
LF. Holliday
CF. Beltran
RF. Martinez/Byrd

Rotation:
1. Santana
2. Harang
3. Bedard
4. Pelfrey
5. Niese

Bullpen:
1. Maine
2. Nieve
3. Duchscherer
4. Feliciano
5. Green
6. Stokes/whoever else you want to insert here
7. BB-Rod

I think this is a realistic plan and makes the 2010 Mets a serious contender for the NL East and the WS.

I think your plan JoseJoseJoseee is very realistic and I feel you may get all that you outlined. The 2009 Mets pre horrific injury list were contending in the NL East. It wasnt until Beltran, the 3rd of the big 4 (Delgado,Reyes,Beltran,Wright) went down that the team fell out of contention. So with the 2010 season upcoming we will retain 3 of the big 4, and add perhaps Holliday or Bay to make a healthier younger big 4. Then adding some pitching and a strong fundamental catcher, right handed compliment to Murphy if we dont even bring back Delgado and there is no reason we cannot contend in 2010.

6. Oliver Perez becomes the highest paid hot dog vendor in the league.

Posted by: JoseJoseJoseeee | October 21, 2009 at 12:46 PM

Man I miss the 2004 Oliver Perez. He's probably my favorite Pirate over the past ten years. He was nearly unstoppable that year and when he would get into Preying Mantis mode, well, I'll just say that got me jacked up about as much as a Griffey Jr. at bat in the 90s.

I remember how nervous I was for the dude in Game 7 of the NLCS.

Hell, my nephew was even named after Oliver Perez.

Okay, I'ma stop now...

Man I miss the 2004 Oliver Perez. He's probably my favorite Pirate over the past ten years. He was nearly unstoppable that year and when he would get into Preying Mantis mode, well, I'll just say that got me jacked up about as much as a Griffey Jr. at bat in the 90s.

I remember how nervous I was for the dude in Game 7 of the NLCS.

Hell, my nephew was even named after Oliver Perez.

Okay, I'ma stop now...

Posted by: bucs_lose_again | October 21, 2009 at 01:36 PM

Sure he used to be a very good pitcher. He still has nasty stuff. He has a great slider and still throws 92-93, which is certainly enough to get by in the bigs. The problem with Ollie continues to be a lack of focus and a lack of mental toughness. He's a baby. Dan Warthen has to hold his hand through every start and constantly remind him to maintain his arm slot and make sure he's falling towards the plate. When you're 28 years old and have been in the bigs for 8 years, that's unacceptable. He changes his mechanics 200 times a year, there is no consistency with this guy. It's like whatever feels good that day he does it, that's why one game he'll throw a one-hitter and strike out 10 and the next outing walk 7 in 2 innings. He's way too inconsistent, and at some point you have to realize he may not live up to the potential he has. That's why signing Ollie was such a bad move, nevermind the amount of money he was given and the fact that not one other team was in on the bidding.

Say the mets sign Holliday. The mets would then be blocking Fernando Martinez, unless they get rid of francouer, but i think even if francouer goes back to what he was on atlanta (unlikley) he goes all out and plays the game right. What Type of pitcher would they be able to get for F-Mart? They won't need him since their OF will be filled and they need pitching.

Jose, don't get me wrong, I wasn't making any excuses for the dude. Actually, I'm kind of pissed at him for wasting such incredible talent. It was always so enigmatic to me how the guy would show up huge for the big games but would get raked by the lower tier teams.

Mets Send:
O. Perez
Castillo
Francoeur(hate to see him go, but you have to give a little)

Cubs Send:
Zambrano
M. Bradley

Posted by: VirtualGM | October 21, 2009 at 09:05 AM
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Would you consider:

Mets send:
Beltran
Perez

Cubs send:
Zombrano
Bradley
Fox

Money is about a wash the next couple of years and the Mets have Martinez to take over in CF. Fox provides right handed platoon at 1B.

Cubs get the middle of the order left handed (switch) bat they desire. Of course both Carlos would have to waiver no trade clause.

"1. Sign Matt Holliday. Adds a big bat to middle of the lineup, a right handed gap splitter who should hit a ton of doubles at Citi, and a decent defensive OF who will man LF for several years.

2. Trade for Aaron Harang. I would bet that we could get him from Cincy relatively cheap if we eat the contract. He could have a lot of success at the cavernous Citi Field.

3. Sign Erik Bedard and Justin Duchscherer to a 1 year incentive laden deal. Both guys have very high upside and add quality rotation depth, not like last year when Omar added Livan and Tim Redding. Also they shouldn't cost too much coming off of injury/psychiactric leave of abscence.

4. Sign Gregg Zaun. Obviously Josh Thole is the catcher of the future and should be groomed as such. Zaun can basically keep the seat warm for Thole, with Thole getting some playing time in the process. Zaun would basically play the same role he did this year with Baltimore holding down the fort until Wieters arrived.

4. Sign Marlon Byrd. I would pencil in Fernando Martinez to play RF next season, but Marlon Byrd is a good insurance option because he is good enough to start should something happen but also can provide depth at all 3 OF positions.

5. Bring Delgado back on a 1 year deal with incentives. Why not? He could at least show some life this year. If not, we have Murphy and Chris Carter to step in.
"

Absolutely perfect. I wouldn't mind Ollie being the number 4 or 5 starter, but I totally agree with your assesment of how they should go about the offseason. I also still think Murphy can be a solid player, but having him him a supersub type role with Delgado back for another year seems perfect to me.

"Would you consider:

Mets send:
Beltran
Perez

Cubs send:
Zombrano
Bradley
Fox
"

It isn't going to happen. Beltran is the Mets best player and they are going to try to win next year. I'm not saying Zambrano and Bradley can't bounce back, I think Bradley definitely will, Zambrano I think can be a good pitcher I don't know if he will rebound to the level where he used to be, but you don't trade your best player for two guys rumored to be salary dump type guys, even though Beltran does have a big contract, he has been worth every penny of it.

Wow run on sentence!

com'n guys, we cannot beat the phillies without matching their first base production, we need adam dunn, he has 1 year left in washington at 12 million, we need his 38 bombs, not murph's 12 dingers. Secondly as far as pitchers, we need guys that eat innings and get strike outs, two tough mental pitchers that meet this criteria, Hudson and Brett myers, love their stuff and toughness, we could get both for two year deals each and let Holt and Mejia blossom more!

Absolutely perfect. I wouldn't mind Ollie being the number 4 or 5 starter, but I totally agree with your assesment of how they should go about the offseason. I also still think Murphy can be a solid player, but having him him a supersub type role with Delgado back for another year seems perfect to me.

Posted by: nrmax88 | October 21, 2009 at 04:06 PM

Yeah I'm positive Ollie will be in the rotation in 2010, I guess as a 4 or 5 he can be effective. Actually with how dominate he can be when he feels like it, having Ollie as a 5 isn't the end of the world. I also still think Murphy can contribute, I was low on him early in 2009, but he really played well at 1B and he showed much better discipline and pitch recognition as the season wore on. I think he can definitely be a key component to the Mets success.

Delgado was hitting the ball well before he got hurt in 2009 though, imagine if we get half of 2008 Delgado back. Especially with Reyes and Castillo at the top of the lineup doing their things, that's 4 big bats to drive in runs. Reyes, Castillo, Beltran, Holliday, Wright, Delgado, Martinez/Byrd, Zaun, and P is a very very potent lineup. It just goes to show how ridiculously close this Mets team is to being WS contenders. We don't need to spend $1 billion dollars signing Matt Holliday, John Lackey, Bengie Molina, Orlando Hudson, Rich Harden or empty the farm system trading for Doc Halladay. Matt Holliday is a splurge buy who will really help this team but the rest of the money needs to be spent wisely on guys with high upside and not Livan Hernandez, Tim Redding, and Alex Cora.

I also agree with what you said about Beltran nrmax88. I hate to hear people who want to move Beltran, he is definitely our best player offensively and defensively. Obviously he has declined slightly with injuries, but he's only 32 and honestly I think he is still the best all around CF in baseball. The guy is a stud. No way should the Mets even consider moving Beltran, he has definitely been worth every penny of that contract.

The mets have 30 mil comin of the books between delgado, wagner, and putz. Go spend that 30 mil on lackey and holliday and sign a lowsalary catcher like barajas

1.Reyes-SS
2.Castillo-2B
3.Beltran-CF
4.Holliday-LF
5.Wright-3B
6.Francouer-RF
7.Murphy-1B
8.Barajas-C


1.Santana
2.Lackey
3.Ollie
4.Pelfrey
5.Maine
-if they stay healthy they should be solid as long as the bullpen holds up

30 million ain't going to buy you Lackey and Holliday. I think the Mets will have more than that to spend if they want, but they probably need to concentrate on a) the rotation and b) depth.

i feel like we should push hard for lackey, we could wrap that deal up and get him over to the east coast. along with marquis, who imo the mets could manage a fairly decent contract, we'd already be set with johan in the mix. somehow getting jon garland or even rich harden in there would be phenomenal.

best package imo both angels pitchers, or harden with marquis and shoot for garland. dream package includes lackey with marquis and possibly harden or garland. haha thats gonna be shuffled around a lot.

in terms of LF, i like what you said about Holliday, although if i remember correctly his defense isn't A-rate, but with spacious Citi Field who cares right?
imo:
1) Matt Holliday
2) Carl Crawford if we can get him
3) Jason Bay

i just wanna see pitching fall through, cause we need support not only for Santana, but we need experienced guys tutoring our young guys like big Pelf and Maine, maybe even Perez who are still young and developing kind of.

I like Daniel Murphy at first, he was solid defensively, and the numbers should come with time.
Luis Castillo at 2nd, his attitude change was great for us and he's an All-Star lets be serious here. Jose Reyes at SS, and David Wright at 3rd, wouldn't have it any other way. Francoeur at RF, and Beltran CF, no brainers. as for catchers, play Santos, with Schneider, if Schneider comes up short keep Santos and see whats up with Thole.

we shouldn't ignore all our prospects too, F-Mart may have had a bad Major League debut, but how many greats went on to have great seasons after debut flukes? that also concerns the likes of Bobby Parnell, as well as our boy Jon Niese, who imo is still our best prospect, cause that injury will go away with time.

scratch Schneider for Greg Zaun, and get Orlando Hudson into that mix as well pertaining to Luis Castillo.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.