MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Odds & Ends: Dodgers, Phillies, Nationals | Main | 2010 Top 50 Free Agents »

Discussion: Phillies And Roy Halladay

Despite Philadelphia GM Ruben Amaro, Jr. describing his needs this winter as "Third base, bullpen, bench," many people within baseball think the Phillies will make a run at Roy Halladay, reports Jim Salisbury of the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Salisbury quotes a rival front office member as saying, "Philadelphia is into winning now, and Halladay fits that." 

Toronto's asking price this past July - pitchers Kyle Drabek and J.A. Happ and outfielders Dominic Brown and Anthony Gose - was too high for Philadelphia. But with Halladay moving closer to free agency, will that price come down?

If you are the Phillies, do you trade a significant package to bring Halladay in? If you are the Blue Jays, what do you need to get this done?


Comments

Here we go again.

Drabek/Happ/Taylor/a 4th player could work, but who knows if this is just smoke this time around?

With more teams:

1. With a need
2. With money
3. With time to fill holes a trade would cause

and time to negotiate an extension, you would think the haul would be equal or bigger in the offseason, history has shown that with future hall of fame types.

No!!!!!!!
The mets can't afford to let the phils do that.

If that's true, you have to think the Mets would overpay to get him. I agree with Beast of the East, that's the final straw for total and complete Philly domination. Toronto would be smart to get really close to a deal with Philly, then bring that to Minaya's attention, and in that case, you'd have to think the Mets would overpay and get Halladay, if only to keep him out of Philly.

I wish the Braves could get him, but they have absolutely NO need for him. They definitely have the prospects.

if Colletti doesn't make a serious run at Halladay and he ends up in the NL I'm going to be pissed.

truth be told i'd be pissed if he ended up anywhere but LA or Toronto, but specifically if Colletti doesn't at least try and pick him up.

Well if the Phillies can't beat the Yankees might as well join them in the way they handle the offseason...you know how the old saying goes

The phillies should wait untill next july to see how cole hamels does.

The Phillies would have to realise that they need to improve because the Mets will probably spend up big, the Marlins play well and the Braves are 1-2 hitters away from being really competitive (when Derek Lowe is your worst starting pitcher thats a great rotation).

That being said, no way can the Phillies trade for Halladay now. This is the same with the Red Sox and Gonzalez. Interest at the deadline does not mean interest now. Red Sox got Martinez who is going to need to place 1st and the Phillies got Lee.

I can't see how the Phillies can extend Lee (which they need to) and Halladay while keeping their other pitching and hitting. So it may be a 1 year rental at a HUGE price, even if it comes down.

They may be into winning now but I bet you they are also into winning for many more years and their prospects would be a big part of that.

Not sure how the Mets could stop this if the Phillies go all in.

The Mets have that one pitcher.. Mejia, Mehia? Something like that?

Can't really see how the Mets can put together a better package.

OK, before the ridiculos proposals start coming... remember that a couple good months by Happ doesnt mean he has become David Price or Clayton Kershaw. He is still a potential #3 guy, nothing more.

If that's true, you have to think the Mets would overpay to get him. I agree with Beast of the East, that's the final straw for total and complete Philly domination. Toronto would be smart to get really close to a deal with Philly, then bring that to Minaya's attention, and in that case, you'd have to think the Mets would overpay and get Halladay, if only to keep him out of Philly.

------------------------

Unfortunately for the Mets, it really does not matter what they want in this case. They cannot put together a package that can beat what the Phils can offer. The Mets have 0 young pitching that would interest the Jays.

J.A. Happ is the luckiest pitcher in baseball this year.

You have to figure the Blue Jays are going to demand Drabek, right?

If Philly wants to pull this off, are they going to throw that kid in?

If they don't, would Philly have to give up both Michael Taylor and Domonic Brown?

With Ibanez being 38, Werth a free agent in a year or two, and Victorino not necessarily being a guy you'd want to give big money too... I think the Phils need to be real sure this is something they want to do.

I guess it's all moot if they find some way to build their package around Happ, but I don't see how Toronto could sell that to their fans.

I agree with DodgerJulio, Tommy Hanson is gonna rip his scrawny little @$$ to pieces in ROTY voting

The phillies should wait untill next july to see how cole hamels does.

Posted by: jarg | November 09, 2009 at 10:13 PM

-------------------

I don't think the Jays are going to wait for the Phillies.

I think this potential move comes down to the Phillies evaluations of Drabek and Hamels. If they think that Drabek will be better than Hamels or if they don't think Hamels has "it" or the third pitch, I could see them making the move. Hamels is on a three year deal to avoid arbitration, which could potentially appeal to Toronto. But I don't see the Phillies trading Drabek unless they feel Drabek isn't a number one or if they think Hamels will go back to his form. There are so many different variables: Drabek's potential, Happ's ceiling, Hamels poor season.

It doesn't take much to see how lucky Happ was in '09, sure, but that doesn't guarantee that execs know this.

Hamels isn't some scrub all of a sudden, either. He pitched with some bad BABIP of his own after a huge increase in innings. The third pitch things needs some help, sure, but he's not getting traded this year.

The Jays need at least 2 solid prospects just to open up the the discussion because Halladay will be a type A in a year. I think it takes 2 more top prospects or young major leaguers with big upside. Something like Taylor, Drabek, Happ, and 1 more prospect.

Drabek, Taylor and either Happ or Brown gets it done.

Both teams win hard with the deal, Phily's rotation goes from good to ridiculously good, and they clean out the farm but getting the WS again will make it worth it. Toronto gets an A-grade prospect and 2 low B ones.

Toronto needs to get rid of Wells before Halladay IMO. Zito for Wells who says no? And then the Jays get a solid #4 instead of a CF. Giants figure Wells will put up better numbers in the NL and they get an OF.

If anyone thinks Hamels' year was that bad, or he might get traded... Think about this: Hamels is just 25 years old, he's going to be 26 next month. He pitched 262 innings last year (includes playoffs) and he pitched 212 innings (includes playoffs) this year. That's a lot of pitches on a 26-year-old arm. But Hamels' BABIP was up, way up, so he was a bit unlucky this year. His FIP was 3.72 this year, last year? It was also 3.72. The Phillies would be stupid if they traded Hamels just cuz of his year... Not gonna happen.

Cole Hamels: 3.72 FIP 4.32 ERA
JA Happ: 4.33 FIP 2.93 ERA

A fine example of "unlucky/lucky" if there ever was one.

"Zito for Wells who says no? And then the Jays get a solid #4 instead of a CF. Giants figure Wells will put up better numbers in the NL and they get an OF."

That leaves the Jays with another back-end pitching jam, with no definite ace in sight, and opens up another outfield position on top of everything else that needs to be filled. As much as Wells contract is an albatross, I'm not so sure that's the right way to go.

They weren't trading Brown and Drabek in July when they could've had a year and a half of Halladay instead of a year. So why exactly would they be trading them now? The Phillies package would probably end at Happ, Taylor, and Gose, maybe somebody else thrown in like Kyle Kendrick or Andrew Carpenter, somebody who would be a cheap ML-ready starter.

Is that enough to get it done? Who knows?

The Phillies MUST do something like this to keep up with the Braves. Everyone knows that the Braves are essentially one slugger away from seriously contending.

The whole first half of last year was terrible with Frenchy, Schafer and Kelly Johnson in the lineup. Next year those players will nto be in the opening day lineup. Frank Wren has shown that he has the balls to make some serious moves to make his club better and the Phllies Front Office knows this.

People are really sleeping on the Braves.

The Phillies MUST do something like this to keep up with the Braves. Everyone knows that the Braves are essentially one slugger away from seriously contending.

The whole first half of last year was terrible with Frenchy, Schafer and Kelly Johnson in the lineup. Next year those players will nto be in the opening day lineup. Frank Wren has shown that he has the balls to make some serious moves to make his club better and the Phllies Front Office knows this.

People are really sleeping on the Braves.

Posted by: drumzalicious | November 09, 2009 at 10:53 PM


Are you serious? The Phillies must do something to keep up with the Braves? Try the other way around. If the Phillies don't get Halladay they will significantly upgrade thirdbase and add a setup guy to step in for Lidge.

yea, the phillies will get him along with king felix and sandy koufax... I mean c'mon ppl I would like a bently but doesn't mean that makes sense for my wallet. The Phillies would more likely go after a Lackey then Roy because they would not have to give up the farm and then possibly in a year lose him because he likes the small town life. Also the Phillies are great and all but how much money do they have and Lee will command over 20 million on the market. So pay Lee 22 million and Halladay will want 24, plus Howard's 15 million + Lidge's 12 + Utley's 11 and Rollins 8.5 = 92.5 not adding Matt Holliday, Lackey, Bay and Damon to be a backup to Werth... hell while we are at it Pujols (via trade) to spot start at 1st and 3rd... i know they made the series back to back but they do not have a NY on their caps.

Right, the National League Champions need to acquire one of the best pitchers in baseball to keep up with the team that finished in third place in their division that currently doesn't have a closer or setup man.

It doesn't take much to see how lucky Happ was in '09, sure, but that doesn't guarantee that execs know this."

Yea, they are gonna go into trade talks for a top 10 pitcher without realizing Happ was lucky as hell...

Now this is the funny thing. Phillies fans feel that Hamels shouldnt be traded for Doc. However, they feel that Billingsley and prospects isnt enough. Well, they had WARs of 3.8 and 3.1, and were werth 16.9 compared to 14.2. And Billingsley was coming off a broken leg. my point? They have similar values but hamels is much higher held, for no obvious reason..

Are you serious? The Phillies must do something to keep up with the Braves? Try the other way around. If the Phillies don't get Halladay they will significantly upgrade thirdbase and add a setup guy to step in for Lidge.

Posted by: Chris | November 09, 2009 at 10:58 PM

Very serious. Look at the reason the Braves struggled this year. It was because of their offense and not having that bat in between chipper and mccann. If Frank Wren gets that bat and a closer we will be set

Your sarcasm is acknowledged and all, nathan, but going to two straight WS can fatten the wallets of any team.

i dont see why the Jays would not rather have a combo of solid players that can help them now AND a good prospect or two.

I think the best deal for the Jays would be:
JA Happ, Jayson Werth, and one of Domonic Brown, Kyle Drabek, Anthony Gose.

Halladay will be the opening day pitcher for the BoSox this year.

Halladay
Lester
Becket
DiceK
Wake/Bedard/Harden

The Blue Jays trading for Werth wouldn't make any sense at all, since he's a free agent after this year too. And since no matter what the Blue Jays do this offseason they are no better than third in the division, they're going for prospects.

It's too bad Ruben Amaro Jr. didn't have the balls to pull the deal at the deadline getting Cliff Lee and this package for Roy! Sure it would have gutted the farm system but I think the Phillies fans would sleep well having back2back titles tucked under there pillows, and gearing up for a three-peat!
They would have gotten 5 first round picks in 2011. A no brainer in my mind.
Who cares now if the Phillies try and trade for Halladay too little too late. As a Jays fan it makes me want to puke knowing that Amaro Jr. let the Yanks get one more before the decade ended.

FORGET HAPP

Anthopolous NOT Riccardi here.
Riccardi was the one insisting on Happ - this is relatively well known to most baseball outlets.

Dominic Brown as the centerpiece of any deal is not unrealistic and should be the starting point of Halladay talks if they resume since Rios has departed.

If the Red Sox got Halladay . . . wow. Halladay, Beckett, and Lester thats a heck of a 1-2-3.

Wonder who they would prioritize re-signing next offseason

if Colletti doesn't make a serious run at Halladay and he ends up in the NL I'm going to be pissed.

truth be told i'd be pissed if he ended up anywhere but LA or Toronto, but specifically if Colletti doesn't at least try and pick him up.

Posted by: ThinkBlue | November 09, 2009 at 10:10 PM"

I wouldn't be mad at all. As soon as everyone understands the importance of the farm system and signing the kids to deals this year, the better we all will be.

No way do the Dodgers sign him after the season, he walks. The monster amount of prospects that it took to get him are wasted. Or it could be worse, Bills and some prospects are sitting in Toronto while we get a compensation pick.

Oh.. I don't think the Phillies get him. Unless the Jays take Hamels as the main piece of the deal.

If Cole Hamels is traded for Roy Halladay, Ruben Amaro will be driven out of town by pitchfork and torch.

thephrontiersman, you feel this way, and yet people are shocked when 90% of Dodger fans call people idiots for wanting to include Billz in a package for halladay, although they are similar pitchers, Hamels and Billz, that is

I can't speak for others but I'm not shocked that Dodger fans don't want a deal like that done.

If I were the Phillies, I'd just go after Lackey instead of making a trade for Halladay. Why give up in-house talent for a 1-year rental? I'd imagine a trade for Halladay would come with a contract extension (though that's not guaranteed)... but they can get a very effective and proven pitcher in Lackey by just inking a deal. A deal for Lackey would probably be a bit cheaper than a contract extension for Halladay.

Don't get me wrong... Halladay is simply great (probably a top 3 pitcher in the entire league)... but how many playoff games has he started? Yeah...

but how many playoff games has he started? Yeah...

Posted by: Agent | November 09, 2009 at 11:57 PM

Well, to be fair to the Doc, he has played in AL East, considered by many as the toughest division to pitch in especially when you aren't part of the Yanks or Red Sox...yet he has put up some of the best numbers in the decade while playing on a sub par team

what about something like this

Victorino, Happ, + not sure who, but probably not anyone like Drabek for Halladay and then sign Figgins to take Victorinos spot at the top of the order? Move Werth to center (might be a stretch) and call up Taylor to play RF. I'd imagine you'd get more production out of him than you would with Feliz.

but how many playoff games has he started? Yeah...

Posted by: Agent | November 09, 2009 at 11:57 PM

Well, to be fair to the Doc, he has played in AL East, considered by many as the toughest division to pitch in especially when you aren't part of the Yanks or Red Sox...yet he has put up some of the best numbers in the decade while playing on a sub par team

Posted by: humannature | November 10, 2009 at 12:12 AM"

How many did Lee start until this year?

Roy Halladay might be the best "pitcher" in the game.

Grant77 - you have it all backwards.

1. Teams don't have "more money" now. Sure they may have lost some FA's but those are holes that will need to be filled.

2. There isn't more need. If I want a starting pitcher there are several available for "free" through FA or available through trade. Need arises in July when you are in the playoff hunt and one of your starters goes down. That's a need.

You want to look at lopsided trades look at the trade deadline. Desperate teams thinking about winning this year trade away their future. The Jays had their chance and missed it. Halladay's value will certainly be less today than it was July 31st.

As for this post - the Phillies should go all in. They have a limited window with the current crop of studs - roll the dice and go for it all in '10. Halladay would be a huge boost to that rotation.

I agree with not trading Werth and I also agree with not trading Drabek. I think a good trade would be Brown, Happ , D'Arnaud, May and PTBNL. I would make that PTBNL - Jarred Cosart, I think he will be a worthwhile pick and move well through the system.

I really think that they will bring in Drabek next year either after ST or in May after so his arb years start later. He would be a 5th starter only because of Lee, Hamels, Halladay and Blanton in front of him, not because of his stuff.

The truth has to be an extension for Lee and Halladay before any of this will ever happen.

6 yrs/ 116 for Lee
5 yrs/ 95 for Halladay


I also feel they will never sell HIGHER on Werth, anyone think the Braves could use a power RH hitting OFer and actually provide some players for him?


Halladay will only be moved for picks/young ML ready players/young current players.

Also, Halladay will not be traded to the AL East. Rookie GM in place, wouldn't take a risk as to trade Toronto's ace within the division. It just doesn't make sence.

Regardless, Halladay will be traded. Anthoupolos won't let the oppertunity pass, Halladay has expressed wanting to play on a winning team, and the blue jays wont reach that status in 2010. Letting him walk would be foolish, regardless of the two draft picks.

Any team trading for Halliday would have to get an extension for any of this to work. It doesn't matter what kind of package the Phils offer for Halliday it all boils down to what team Doc wants to pitch for.

The Phils can address their needs thru FA.
1) 3B
2) RP
3) SP
They need to add a solid RH hitter in the middle of the lineup.
Lee,Hamels,Happ,Blanton is decent and maybe signing Harden with Drabek in the wings.
Valverde and Gonzalez would be worthwhile FA signings.
Signing FA Beltre,Harden,Valverde and Gonzalez would cost them around 22 mil per.

"Halladay will only be moved for picks/young ML ready players/young current players."

He def will not be traded for picks...

People, if the Phillies were willing to trade Domonic Brown or Kyle Drabek, we wouldn't be talking about trading for Roy Halladay, we'd be talking about the possibility of him re-signing with the Phillies, because he would have been traded in July.

They weren't willing to trade them then, and they certainly aren't going to trade them now, which is why I don't think Halladay is going to be a Phillie, at least not this year.

Cole Hamels+1 of Drabek or Happ and call it deal.

"J.A. Happ is the luckiest pitcher in baseball this year."

Happ was 12-4 with a 2.93 ERA in 166 innings pitched. kershaw had a lower era in more innings pitched, so im not takin anything away from him...but how would u say he's lucky? run support? look i agree, as a phils fan, im not gonna get too excited about him till he gets another year under his belt--but at the same time the phils have such a young core group of rollins, utley, howard that "winning NOW" ie getting roy halladay--isnt as pressing for the phils as it is for other teams. the phils will contend in the NL with or without roy halladay.

beltre is gonna be the big offseason move this year. watch. lets go phils!

if there are serious roy halladay trade talks, the dodgers will headline the discussions.

If Roy Halladay pitched a full season in the NL, with the Phillies offence he could very well win 25 games. As a Jays fan I'm going to miss him, the most consistent, reliable guy you could ask for. He seems to have a knack for showing up to big games (as big as they got in Toronto). As a fan if he is traded I would start with your #1 prospect and work from there. It's worth it.

From the Phillies perspective trading for Halliday without an extension is a waste of time.

You don't give up your best prospects for a 1-year rental.Amaro would be crucified for doing so.

It's funny how some people think the price is going to go up here... The Jays still face the same problem they had last time. They can't sell to their fans the idea of trading to the red sox or the yankees.

For a one year rental the offer from any team will be along the lines of Happ (major league ready pitching), Taylor or Brown (Prized outfield prospect), and maybe some other pitching prospect, but certainly not your best prospect.

The Jays missed their chance to get a huge haul for Halladay at the deadline. Now that's the best they'll get from anyone.

I got the jump on mlbtraderumors. This just in Hamels for Halladay

"the phils have such a young core group of rollins, utley, howard"

Rollins=30 (31 in 17 days)
Howard=29 (30 in 9 days)
Utley 30 (31 in December)

Not exactly "Young" as you implied.

this is a tough one. i really dont think ruben is willing to give up the farm. and even though doc's asking price is going to be less now than it was at the trade deadline, he is still top 3 most dominant pitchers over the last 5 seasons. his asking price coming down is going to attract much more attention, as i think the jays should be smart and deal him this offseason.

take 2 of--victorino, taylor, brown, mayberry jr.

take 1 of--happ, drabek

throw in a hewitt, harmon infielder or a escalona, bastardo reliever.

---only givin up half the farm. i think im okay with that.

For anyone who thinks that Hamels is even being considered

Taylor or Brown will not be in any deal for Halliday unless Halliday agrees to pitch in Philly and is amenable to signing an extension.

So far Halliday has mentioned only 2 teams he'd be interested in going to -the Yanks and the Sawx.Until he waives his no trade clause and says OK to Philly and the Toronto GM says OK to Philly negotiating an extension NOTHING WILL HAPPEN.

sorry for the previous post accidently hit enter.

Now for anyone who thinks Hamels is being trzded is plain nuts you dont trade 25 year old lefties that are as quality as Hamels. Common now. Werth is to much a part of this team to be traded as well. If any out feilder were to be trade would be victorino. with all that said, why are we revisiting this bs again. nothing will be done. if doc goes anywhere it would be the dodgers but with the trades of the past deadlines do they really want to make their system that barron? even if they get him could they still beat the phils, i dont think so. why make the deal than.

Now, for the phils to get Halladay does make sense for the simple fact that just getting the WS is not good. Getting Halladay puts them in place to have a very good chance of winning the ws. you only get Halladay if the price is right ie not giving up your top 3 propects.

Now what i think the phils are gonna do is pass on him intially and wait til the deadline to see if he is available. they might sign soriano from the braves, go out and get figgins, and please for the love of god get a bench. either way right now they are still the best team in the division and NL

"the phils have such a young core group of rollins, utley, howard"

Rollins=30 (31 in 17 days)
Howard=29 (30 in 9 days)
Utley 30 (31 in December)

Not exactly "Young" as you implied.

********
but what infield can contend with that. rollins will be resigned after this season, for his glove if nothing else. utley is here for 4 more seasons, howard for 2. I guess i should have said "in-their-prime players."

sure halladay would make a difference, and i would love to see it. but ruben doesnt want to give up all the prospects, AND they need to be able to financially offer him an extention beyond the 2010 season.


Halladay
Lee
Hamels

In a short series that's dominant.

Phillies going after Doc will probably be dictated by what the Yanks do in my opinion. If the Yanks sign Lackey ( i am NOT saying that they will) the Phillies might have to go after Doc

I'd only want a trade for the Doc if we were able to sign an extension, similar to the Santana deal. Then, I think it would be worth trading for him. I'd say trade Victorino, Happ and 2 other lower prospects and we can call it a deal. But really, I'd rather wait a year, save the farm and sign him next year.

Now this is the funny thing. Phillies fans feel that Hamels shouldnt be traded for Doc. However, they feel that Billingsley and prospects isnt enough. Well, they had WARs of 3.8 and 3.1, and were werth 16.9 compared to 14.2. And Billingsley was coming off a broken leg. my point? They have similar values but hamels is much higher held, for no obvious reason..
***

One led his team to a World Championship and won two series MVP awards while the other was dropped from his team's rotation. That's a pretty obvious reason.

And to whoever labeled Drabek, Taylor and Brown as "an A and two lower level B [prospects]" is smoking drugs. They're all top 25 BA prospects, and at this point the Jays wouldn't get more than one of them.

The Phillies could decide Victorino is part of their future in center, and package Brown with a JA Happ and a Kyle Kendrick and that would be enough for a year of Doc at this point. 2 MLB ready starters and an elite prospect.

They're not going to trade Drabek and I expect them to hold onto Taylor for a part time role in 2011 (full time if Ibanez is really struggling?) with plan to let him take over after Ibanez is gone. This assumes they decide to allocate alot of money to locking up Werth and Lee instead of any other FAs, and only have room for one OF in the coming years.

Happ was 12-4 with a 2.93 ERA in 166 innings pitched. kershaw had a lower era in more innings pitched, so im not takin anything away from him...but how would u say he's lucky? run support? look i agree, as a phils fan, im not gonna get too excited about him till he gets another year under his belt--but at the same time the phils have such a young core group of rollins, utley, howard that "winning NOW" ie getting roy halladay--isnt as pressing for the phils as it is for other teams. the phils will contend in the NL with or without roy halladay."

His LOB% and BABIP against(i forgot the true name of the stat...). He was extremley lucky, although not many people will look at the advanced stats and just assume he was great.

Like many have said, he had a great year, but it looks better than it was because of underlying stats...

If Doc played for a decent team in the NL, he'd win 30 games. the AL East had 3 of the top 5 offenses in the AL last year, and Doc pitched against BOS, NYY, and Tampa Bay 5 times each. 15 of his 32 starts against 3 of the top 5 offenses in the AL, and he still had a 2.79 ERA, 1.13 WHIP, 239ip, and 9 CG. His year-to-year consistency against the best offenses in the league is what sets Halladay apart from all the other 'great' pitchers. Greinke had a great year in 2009. Didn't face the Yankees once, pitched against Boston once, pitched against TB twice.

Doc is one of the best pitchers in the game. Its going to take a top package centered around Drabek and others to get him.

You can't look at him as strictly a 1 year rental, its either he'll sign an extension and you'll have him probably for the rest of his career or you get him for 1 year plus 2 picks, 2 fairly high picks.

Baseball drafts are far from anything guaranteed but why would the Jays settle for lesser prospects when they could just hold onto Halladay and get a shot at drafting 2 blue-chip prospects? It isn't a money thing, Halladay's contract is very reasonable and likely there would be a hit at the gate this year with a trade.

This makes no sense, get Halladay for one year, give up your prospects, and Cliff Lee MIGHT become a Free Agent after this year, you end up with nothing. Big gamble I think.

Length of contract. Work on extending Lee. I honestly do not know what that guy is going to command in salary. Obviously more than Burnett's 5/82.5. Just work to extend Lee. No trade for Halladay. Save the farm and buy arms in the FA in 2011. Plenty of options to fall back on if you can't land Halladay.


Halladay for 5/95? Laughing. Since NYY and BOS will be knee deep in the mix, go ahead and start thinking somethin along the lines of 6/125 starting for the best pitcher in the game. Money well spent in my opinion even if he is 34 at FA. Surround him with an offense, and that guy will be a winning machine for the rest of his career.

Mock that contract proposal all you want, but wait and see. If BOS can't come to terms with Beckett, you can bet Halladay's price absolutely skyrockets.

ToBe:

It's funny how different people's recollections can be...I don't ever recall Doc saying he'd go ANYWHERE...but "people close to Doc" mentioned Philly and Boston. Never read anyone say he'd expressed interest in NY.

In fact, after the trade deadline when Doc had a bit of a bad stretch, sources were quoted saying it was because he had fully expected to pitch for Philly.

In regards to what the Phils can trade...there's rumor they want to shop Victorino, so there's a possible chip there...he's still controlled for two seasons.

If TOR has interest in Vic, then Vic-Happ/Drabek-2 B prospects may get it done. If not, Taylor/Brown-Happ/Drabek and one B prospect.

They're not going to get the three MLB-ready or A prospects JP wanted...not now, not ever.

"The Phillies could decide Victorino is part of their future in center, and package Brown with a JA Happ and a Kyle Kendrick and that would be enough for a year of Doc at this point. 2 MLB ready starters and an elite prospect."


That has to be, without a doubt, the most ridiculous thing I've read around here in while--all the more because it was written in earnestness and not the faux,

"OMG, CASHMAN BETTER SIGN HOLLIDAY/LACKEY N TRADE FOR PAPELBON OR HE IS DA SUXORS1!@!!"

type thing.

Why? Because there is no way in this reality that the Jays would base a trade for Halladay--even 1 year of him--on one prospect, 1 mid-rotation type starter, and a fringey MLB arm at best in Kyle Kendrick. Not a chance, especially when the Jays can hold onto Halladay, offer him arbitration after 2010, and already have what would be in all likelihood 2 better prospects than Brown and Happ(or at least equal).

No soup for you.

Next! ;)

Happ pitched all of 6.1 innings for Philly in the playoffs....the other three players coveted by Toronto made no impact at all in the World Series.....anyone think a Lee-Halladay starting two matches up more favorably against CC-AJ?

The Dodgers also have to be kicking themselves, one of Billingsley or Kershaw could have been the centrepiece and assured the Doc in a LA uniform.....what did those two do in the post season? One has to think the market hasn't 'shriveled' for Halladay because he has one year left. Perhaps the reverse - some teams who could 'win now' may need this ace to battle the payroll juggernauts the Yanks.....I think the Phillies and Dodgers understand because they ran up against better one-two combinations in the post-season

StarryEyed: With all due respect, if you think you're going to get a prospect better or even equal to Brown out of your run-of-the-mill 1st-rd pick, you're insane.

The Jays would be getting a 1st-rd pick from most likely one of the major teams (NYY, BOS etc etc) so it's going to be LOW 1st. Brown is a top-25 prospect in all of baseball.

why would the dodgers be kicking themselves? they still would not have beat the phils and they wont if they Doc next year

Muggi:
"With all due respect, if you think you're going to get a prospect better or even equal to Brown out of your run-of-the-mill 1st-rd pick, you're insane.

The Jays would be getting a 1st-rd pick from most likely one of the major teams (NYY, BOS etc etc) so it's going to be LOW 1st. Brown is a top-25 prospect in all of baseball."

Wasn't Brown drafted in the 20th round? and now 3 years later is a top 25 prospect. Its insane to think the Jays could find an equal or better player with 2 picks within the 25-35 range? I'm not debating how valuable of a prospect Brown may be. But to say its insane the Jays couldn't find someone equal to him with a 1st round pick (and 1 compensatory) when the Phillies found him with a 20th is RIDICULOUS

As a Jays fan I find it funny that SOME Philly fans think that the Jays have to trade Halladay and can settle on a package with a whole bunch of lesser prospects (ie no Drabeck). Its funny to me while not the exact situation, it similar to when Billy Wagner left the Phillies and signed with the Mets. Who did the Phillies get to draft for compensation in losing a Type A Wagner, that'd be Kyle Drabeck and Adrian Cardenas (who was traded to get Blanton)

And having Wagner that last year was detrimental to the team where as holding onto Halladay is nothing but good things for a young Jays pitching staff

It smells of jockeying for position and raising the ante...

At this point, outside of the Cardinals keeping their current core together, getting a legit lefty slugger and merely showing up in the playoffs, there isn't a team in the NL that can compete with the Phillies...

However, the Phils can't start letting teams of the likes of the Mets, Dodgers, or even the Yankees or Red Sox make a play for Halladay...

The Phils are the only team in the NL that can compete with the likes of the ALs elite... Keeping the cost high for NL teams and keeping him out of the hands of the ALs elite is imparitive...

With Halladay's down slide towards the end of last season, I would say that Michael Taylor, JA Happ, and an Antonio Bastardo type would suffice...

Any trade would, obviously, be heavily dependant on an extensive examination on his arm...

With that said, I think there is little chance the Phils actually make a play for him...

Rumors are that a trade of hamels for halladay are in the mix. Makes sense, Hamels has been a goon for the last 2 years

"With Halladay's down slide towards the end of last season..."

allaboutthephils, are you referring to the 1.47 ERA in September, the 2.72 ERA after the all-star break, or just the generally weak showing against playoff teams (like his 1 hit shutout of the Yankees)?

Rumors are that a trade of hamels for halladay are in the mix. Makes sense, Hamels has been a goon for the last 2 years

Did you watch the 2008 season or playoffs? he is the reason why the phillies won the 2008 world series. if he gets his head on straight and realises that he actually needs to work hard because the league adjusted to him he will be fine. it is not big if. he has been an above average pitcher since coming into the league. and no trading him for halladay makes no sense for the phillies. yes halladay is better however, there are not many number 2 in the league better Hamels. remember when Halladay got sent back to the minors i am sure everyone wrote him off to. i am just sick of everyone saying that hamels is a bad pitcher and he is done. yes i would love to acquire halladay but not at the price of hamels just not happening so all of these so called reports are pure bullshit.

bwilly: is it possible? Sure, but most picks never get to Brown's level regardless of draft-round.

What I'm saying is I think it's insane to say, "the Jays will get a player of Brown's caliber" JUST BECAUSE it's a 1st-rd pick. It doesn't work that way. More 1st-rounders fail than succeed.

Do they have a BETTER chance of finding a comparable player in the 1st rd? Of course, but it's still a gamble.

"StarryEyed: With all due respect, if you think you're going to get a prospect better or even equal to Brown out of your run-of-the-mill 1st-rd pick, you're insane."


I'll let bwilly's reply serve as mine, but I'll also say this--there's really no certainty in correlating draft position with certainty of future MLB potential/ability to get into the majors and be productive/whatever you want to call it.

But, I think your later assertion of "more 1st rounders fail than succeed" could be applied to any round(more players in the 20th round fail than they succeed), and the chances of success for a player taken in any round decrease the farther you go from the 1st round, I'm sure.

"The Jays would be getting a 1st-rd pick from most likely one of the major teams (NYY, BOS etc etc) so it's going to be LOW 1st. Brown is a top-25 prospect in all of baseball."


Well...

1. Calling him a top-25 prospect depends on who you talk to, as I don't think all of the ranking systems(BA, BP, Keith Law, Project Prospect, Minor League Ball) have him in the top-25. Call him a top-50 prospect and I'll be fine with that.

2. Having said that, Brown struggled once he was promoted to AA Reading this year. He struck out more, walked less, and has struggled a bit with his defense. He's only 20, so he'll probably start 2010 at AA and have time to adapt, but I think I'd like to see him tear up AA before calling him "elite"--but that's a matter of opinion.

The Dodgers also have to be kicking themselves, one of Billingsley or Kershaw could have been the centrepiece and assured the Doc in a LA uniform.....what did those two do in the post season? One has to think the market hasn't 'shriveled' for Halladay because he has one year left. Perhaps the reverse - some teams who could 'win now' may need this ace to battle the payroll juggernauts the Yanks.....I think the Phillies and Dodgers understand because they ran up against better one-two combinations in the post-season"

WHAT? You want the Dodgers to trade a 21 year old who had an ERA under 3 this year or a guy coming off a broken leg had an ERA of 2.7 in the first 90 games of the year, then his leg began acting up again? For one year of Doc? Are you crazy??

And besides, it wasnt the pitching that was our downfall. We know that Philly will score runs, but you need to be able to match it. Our offense died. Manny didnt hit, Kemp didnt hit, Blake didnt, Furcal didnt, etc. It was offense more than pitching, and if the Dodgers had traded Billingsley or Kershaw for Halladay, I probably wouldnt have watched any more games this year...

StarryEyed:

Fair enough.

I'd like to add though...his "struggles" in AA were still good enough for an .800 OPS :)

we will do it but we will have to give up happ brown kendrick and cash

yea, the phillies will get him along with king felix and sandy koufax... I mean c'mon ppl I would like a bently but doesn't mean that makes sense for my wallet. The Phillies would more likely go after a Lackey then Roy because they would not have to give up the farm and then possibly in a year lose him because he likes the small town life. Also the Phillies are great and all but how much money do they have and Lee will command over 20 million on the market. So pay Lee 22 million and Halladay will want 24, plus Howard's 15 million + Lidge's 12 + Utley's 11 and Rollins 8.5 = 92.5 not adding Matt Holliday, Lackey, Bay and Damon to be a backup to Werth... hell while we are at it Pujols (via trade) to spot start at 1st and 3rd... i know they made the series back to back but they do not have a NY on their caps.

Posted by: nathan | November 09, 2009 at 10:58 PM


I dont think you need to worry about Halladay leaving because he likes the "small town life". Toronto is 3.5 times larger Philadelphia ( 5.5 million in Toronto 1.5 million in Philly as stated by http://www.mongabay.com/igapo/North_American_cities.htm

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.