![]() |
|
|
| |
« Dodgers Notes: Manny, Schmidt, Offseason | Main | Trade Market: Third Basemen »
In his latest blog post (ESPN Insider required), Buster Olney discusses what he refers to as baseball's "next great economic disparity," referring to the large number of players, young and old, who stand to make more money through arbitration than they would on the free agent market. One executive referred to the arbitration process as "outdated."
Multiple general managers feel that there will be dozens of non-tendered players over the course of the next 41 days. In total, Olney and some baseball executives counted 93 "solid" non-tender candidates as they examined each team's roster (check out Tim's list here). If the final number comes close to that, nearly 300 players will be looking for a new team this offseason, vastly deflating the asking price for most free agents.
Olney names two non-tender candidates in detail, in J.J. Hardy and Bobby Jenks:
Olney feels that some big market teams could reel in non-tender candidates from small market teams for lower level prospects and wait to see if they pan out over the remainder of their time under team control. Additionally, he says that teams such as the Twins will be able to take fliers on non-tendered players and receive tremendous value.
What other non-tender candidates do you see emerging this offseason, and where might they land? Share your thoughts in the comments section.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
I've heard this suggestion about Hardy before. I just don't see him having that little value that he would be non-tendered. Too many teams are in need of a SS (4-6 mill is high but not ridiculous). Jenks on the otherhand I could see non-tendered.
Posted by: Kinsm | November 01, 2009 at 03:37 PM
I like how he calls it outdated but doesn't offer a constructive solution.
Posted by: GScott | November 01, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Why don't the Brewers just keep Hardy and start the season as him as the starter. Let him build up some value and then trade in him within a month and install Alcides Escobar as the starter.
Posted by: metfan57 | November 01, 2009 at 03:42 PM
Awful example by Olney. Hardy's defense alone at a premium position like SS makes him worth the 4.5 million or so he'd be paid through arbitration.
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | November 01, 2009 at 03:44 PM
Agreed, Kinsm. Even getting a low-level warm body back for Hardy would be better than non-tendering him.
Still, I just can't imagine them not getting one bite simply because teams know that if he's non-tendered he could come cheaper.
Hardy actually works well as an example of the type of scenario Olney suggested, in which large market teams can gamble on a high-upside player by giving up mediocre prospects.
However, if they really are unable to strike up a deal, then I could see it as a possibility.
Posted by: Steve Adams | November 01, 2009 at 03:45 PM
why is there such intrest in jj hardy? he had a couple decent seasons 07 and 08. he struggled this year and now teams want to trade prospects for him? if i were a team in need of a shortstop id much rather try to sign someone like orlando cabrera
Posted by: Timmy B | November 01, 2009 at 03:46 PM
Hey Steve, the link is broken. There's two http:// in the code.
Posted by: BF91 | November 01, 2009 at 03:48 PM
Thanks BF91, copy/paste error. Sorry about that one.
Posted by: Steve Adams | November 01, 2009 at 03:51 PM
why is there such intrest in jj hardy? he had a couple decent seasons 07 and 08. he struggled this year and now teams want to trade prospects for him? if i were a team in need of a shortstop id much rather try to sign someone like orlando cabrera
Posted by: Timmy B | November 01, 2009 at 03:46 PM
A couple decent seasons? Try near all star level seasons. People forget that Hardy is a top notch fielder at SS who averaged roughly an .800 OPS with 25 HR's per season at a traditionally weak hitting position. That is incredibly valuable
Posted by: bravesfan22193 | November 01, 2009 at 03:59 PM
There's better, and cheaper options than Jenks on the market that the Rays could sign or trade for.
It would take significantly more than that package to even make Tampa even think about moving Crawford.
Posted by: Steve Adams | November 01, 2009 at 04:11 PM
hardys seasons were nowhere near allstar seasons. i recall in 07 that he was the best offensive shortstop or close to it for the first 2 months of the season. but then he slumped the rest of the year and had an average statistical season. the only value he brings is power at a weak position and defense. he is nowhere near reyes escobar jeter hanley ramirez rollins tulowitzki
Posted by: Timmy B | November 01, 2009 at 04:28 PM
You really cherry picked his statement. He said NEAR all-star seasons. No one, except for you, tried to compare him to Reyes, Escobar, Jeter, Hanley, Rollins or Tulo.
You are completely missing the point that teams need shortstops, and JJ is probably the best option given his excellent upside (great glove, .270, 25 HR).
Posted by: R y a n | November 01, 2009 at 04:42 PM
@chisox33, I'm a sox fan but the only way the rays do that deal is if the sox take on Jenks's pay for 2010. The post just mentions how they think these players will be overpaid. Why in the world would the Rays take on an overpayed Bobby Jenks? When their goal would be to shed payroll.
Posted by: g13 | November 01, 2009 at 04:58 PM
I wouldn't mind seeing the Mets take a shot on Jenks. He would replace JJ Putz both in role and in salary, and if he is a non-tender candidate you would think it would be do-able for low level prospects, or even fringe major leaguers.
I also would be happy to see them get Hardy in this kind of deal, and move him over to 2B, but I don't really see that happening. I think Hardy will have some value on the trade market, and if not Brewers would be smarter just to keep him and let him build some value (as suggested upthread), then trade him later.
Posted by: jakec | November 01, 2009 at 05:01 PM
Hardy would be a good pick up for the Sox if he becomes available... but I wouldn't trade anything for him.
Posted by: Blackcourt | November 01, 2009 at 05:01 PM
chisox - that is such a horrible trade offer. crawford is coming off a great season and jenks a pretty bad season. yes jenks makes less and the rays want to shed payroll, but they can get a cheaper closer on the free agent market. crawford possibly could be dealt but for a pretty big package of prospects....not as big as halladay but possibly something a tad smaller than what the indians got for lee
Posted by: xwoojinx | November 01, 2009 at 05:25 PM
Crawford will surely have his $ 10 million option picked up, even if the Rays intend to trade him.
I would think that some club would want Hardy at $ 5 mil plus per season. The Tigers should go after him. He fits the description of ABE (anyone but Everett). But if the Brewers want top prospects for a guy that wasn't worth his contract last year, they want to rethink that. You can have Jeremy Bonderman, Nate Robertson, Dontrelle Willis, Alfredo Figaro, Armando Galarraga, or Zach Miner for Hardy.
Iwamura is another in that class. I would think he's just about worth his 4.25 mil option to a team like the Dodgers.
Jenks is probably a better closer than most on the free agent market, and he'd cost a little bit less than most of them.
So, an executive thinks that the arbitration system is "outdated". Go figure! Even though only 3 of 111 cases actually went to a hearing, and all the rest were settled! How about let's just make players free agents after three years? OH! But executives think that the free market system is outdated also. That's why they were found liable for collusion in a Court of law!
I still say that there's more than just the economy keeping salaries down. It's not like they're all on the phone with each other colluding to not pay free agents, but there aren't any good ol fashioned bidding wars for free agents any more. The Yankees pick what they want, over pay them, and the other clubs divvy up the rest without a bidding war.
Posted by: Tigerdog | November 01, 2009 at 05:27 PM
Hardy could land in Baltimore. Even if he never reaches his upside, he's still a better hitter than Cesar Izturis, and according to UZR, he's at least comparable as a fielder, if not better. We don't have any top shortstop prospects in the minors, so even if Hardy only stays for 1 or 2 years, he wouldn't be blocking anyone.
The Orioles will also take a close look at non-tendered third basemen, with Garrett Atkins at the top of the list. Here, we do have a top prospect in Josh Bell, so if we were to sign someone like Atkins, we would probably look to trade him (or move them to 1B/DH) if he played well. Otherwise we could always non-tender him ourselves.
Posted by: ugen64 | November 01, 2009 at 05:35 PM
ChiSox - you think the Rays would rather pay Jenks 7 than Crawford 10?
That is such a terrible deal. There are truckloads of young good arms that could close for the Rays at minimum who the Rays could get for Crawford.
Posted by: quintjs | November 01, 2009 at 05:45 PM
I think Hardy to Baltimore is a good option.
Posted by: quintjs | November 01, 2009 at 05:46 PM
I'd really like to see Hardy land in Cincinnati. The Reds even match up fairly well in trade since they have some decent pitching prospects in their system.
Posted by: schellis | November 01, 2009 at 06:04 PM
@Quintjs, I think they tried that this yr and it failed. I think of most teams thought that then nobody would pay a closer big money.
But I do agree with your first sentence..."you think the Rays would rather pay Jenks 7 than Crawford 10?" That is my point with chisox also. I wish chisox's deal would come true but the rays ain't that dumb.
Posted by: g13 | November 01, 2009 at 06:08 PM
Hardy is a fantastic reclamation project (and I use that term with my tongue in my cheek, since he's only one season removed from putting up two extremely valuable seasons as an .800 OPS shortstop with fantastic defense.
Unfortunately, those fellas grow on trees, so I expect to see him non-tendered and offered a one-year incentive-laden deal with the Newark Bears...
Posted by: DunkinDonuts | November 01, 2009 at 06:11 PM
I can definitely see the White Sox going with Matt Thornton at closer, but I don't see them non-tendering Jenks. Trading him, yes, but not just letting him go for nothing. He still has value.
Posted by: rememberthecoop | November 01, 2009 at 06:21 PM
Tough to see the Brewers non-tendering Hardy. He's young and obviously has talent. Someone will give up something descent for him making it a better deal for them than just removing his salary. Jenks I could see being non-tendered since there are so many closers available and he's not likely to be worth what he's going to get paid (he is a closer after all). He's going to disappoint some other team besides the Sox next year. I can see a small market team who's not going to contend anyway that has money to spend waiting until right before spring training to overpay Jenks with the thought of dealing him before the deadline, the Jenks gets hurt and it all goes south. Sounds far fetched sure but that just seems plausible for some reason, he's a White Sox, he's a closer, he's going to screw over some unsuspecting, unfortunate team.
Posted by: pageian | November 01, 2009 at 07:00 PM
I'm glad Olney did a piece on this - he just used the wrong examples (especially Hardy).
Arbitration is designed to give clubs some amount of cost control for players that have yet to reach FA. Historically, that has meant that the gap between FA salaries and arb salaries was huge.
Now, with Howard (and soon to be Lincecum) we see guys in their arb years earning close to the equivalent as their FA equivalents. While arb players are only signed for one year, many clubs are having to take huge gambles on long-term commitments because they know they cannot risk going year to year with a guy.
Put another way, it used to be that teams would trade guys right before FA since they knew they couldn't retain then once they hit the open market. Now teams are making those decisions 2-3 years into a players career when they first become arb eligible. They know that they can't afford $10m or so on a guy that has 2 years of ML experience. Those players get traded off to teams with deep pockets. So now, rich teams can sign the best FA's and take on expensive arb players.
The other factor is that in depressed markets FA's are signing for LESS money. However, arb cases seem to continue at their standard pace. Is JJ Hardy at $7m next year really worth 25% more than Bobby Abreu? In Abreu's case he was absolutely crushed by the economy while a guy like Hardy figures to get a nice raise despite the fact he spent substantial time in the minors.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 01, 2009 at 07:18 PM
Yeah to that White Sox fan who thinks Bobby Jenks could land Carl Crawford...you must have some fantastic drugs
Posted by: brian91388 | November 01, 2009 at 08:53 PM
you say hardy is streaky, tulowitski in 3 years had 2 graet years and 1 year that he batted worse than hardy did this year...i think hardy has a lot of potential and a change of scenery is best for him. hardy should rake in some top prospects.
every team in the league would love to have hardy's gloveo n their field, and he has proven (not this year but the last few) that he can hit, being the teams best hitter down the stretch for the playoff run.
but i think escobar is the better choice, he brings everything hardy has to the table and speed, and as the only saying goes, "speed cant slump".
Posted by: brewcrew13 | November 01, 2009 at 09:51 PM
Hardy has to get tendered, he is really worth the 4.5M gamble on turning his bad season around and worth a B prospect even if they decide to move him, and worth holding onto if they can't get that in a swap.
Only foolish tightfisted/cheap teams like the Rays and Fish would even think of non tendering someone like Hardy. Those are the kind of teams that have 1 good year, then return to mediocre for decades.
Posted by: johns | November 01, 2009 at 10:41 PM
Hardy would be a good fit in a lot of places and worth the arbitration risk - but none of these posts mention the back issue. That is why he missed much of 09 and also why he was ineffective when he did play. I know he's only 27, but this has Joe Crede written all over it. JJ needs to show he can still play and the back problem is not going to be chronic. For many teams he is too big a gamble.
Posted by: Redbird | November 02, 2009 at 07:54 AM
"I wouldn't mind seeing the Mets take a shot on Jenks. He would replace JJ Putz both in role and in salary, and if he is a non-tender candidate you would think it would be do-able for low level prospects, or even fringe major leaguers."
Bobby Jenks for Angel Pagan and Francisco Pena?
Posted by: scribbletone | November 02, 2009 at 08:35 AM
Brewers rarely non tender anyone with even minimal trade value. Bush is a perfect non-tender candidate and nobody is even hinting they plan to non tender him. Bush has even less trade value than Hardy.
I'm certain they won't non-tender Hardy either.
I also can't see them just giving him away for a mid to low level prospect either.
If they don't get value back, they'll add another player and deal him as a package. Brewers have some bullpen depth from which they could deal.
Posted by: DaveinEG | November 02, 2009 at 10:32 AM
DaveinEG, why, oh why, would the Brewers even think of non-tendering Dave Bush? He has been a quality pitcher for this team, and the last thing we can afford to do is non-tender a quality pitcher. Why is everyone always talking about getting rid of Dave Bush? What, did he kick your puppy? He's done nothing to deserve being cut or non-tendered.
Anyway, as for J.J. Hardy, he will NOT be non-tendered. He WILL be traded. I still think that the Brewers and Orioles could make a trade. Think about it, they need a stop-gap at 3rd base and a young shortstop, and we can provide them with that. J.J. Hardy and Mat Gamel for something like Brad Bergesen and Radhames Liz.
A trade with the BoSox could happen, but I really am starting to think it won't. They don't seem like they would be willing to give up what the Brewers would be asking.
A trade with the Twins could work. Hardy for Liriano straight up seems fair for both sides, in my opinion.
Posted by: Sage | November 02, 2009 at 03:56 PM
"A trade with the BoSox could happen, but I really am starting to think it won't. They don't seem like they would be willing to give up what the Brewers would be asking."
Boston just gave Iglesia 8.5M and also has maybe even Navarro, or Tejada to look at in the future and can always use Lowrie or Gonzalez next year, it makes no sense for Boston to give up anything for Hardy as a crapshoot, now if they didn't have anybody close coming up through the pipeline it would be a different story, but both Iglesia and Navarro are both good prospects.
I still think that the Brewers should hang onto Hardy, his trade value is just too low right now IMO and hope he rebounds until at least the 7/31 trade deadline.
Posted by: johns | November 02, 2009 at 06:33 PM
"A trade with the Twins could work. Hardy for Liriano straight up seems fair for both sides, in my opinion"
The Brewers are trying to IMPROVE their starting rotation and a guy who threw 5.80 era will not do it.
In all likelihood, the Brewers will package Hardy with Gamel to trade for a #3 or a young #4 then add another starter in free agency.
Posted by: JoeI | November 02, 2009 at 08:31 PM
Whatever team ends up with Bobby Jenks will miss the playoffs because of the move.
Posted by: LHSP89 | November 03, 2009 at 09:30 AM
"hardys seasons were nowhere near allstar seasons."
He made the all-star team in 07. You are an idiot!
Posted by: TheKid19 | November 03, 2009 at 12:30 PM
"J.J. Hardy and Mat Gamel for something like Brad Bergesen and Radhames Liz."
There is no way this would ever happen. The Brewers are hoping to get established talent back for Hardy. Might not happen but hoping. If you throw Gamel in, their 2nd rated prospect, then they will demand proven players. Not a guy who has made 19 career starts, and another guy who has a career ERA of 7.50 who can't even be effective in Baltimore.
Posted by: TheKid19 | November 03, 2009 at 12:38 PM
DaveinEG
Bush is only a good non tender candidate if they feel he's not going to be healthy. When healthy, Bush is a solid #3 starter. He had no history of injury until Hanley Ramirez scorched a liner of his pitching elbow. It's a freak injury that very well could have ruined Cain's an Greinke's seasons as well.
Sage
If the Brewers trade Hardy to Baltimore they should look to get Guthrie back. Both guys were very good in 2007-2008, but had disappointing seasons in 2009. That's the type of deal they're going to need to get their bang for their buck (Hardy). Liriano is another good suggestion as similar trade for Hardy.
Posted by: Warboss74 | November 03, 2009 at 01:49 PM
I saw somewhere that KC might trade Greinke to Milwaukee for Hardy, Gamel, Parra and maybe another player. Anyone know if that's real?
Posted by: geniusmrx | November 04, 2009 at 05:20 AM