21 Extensions For Arbitration Eligible Players

When a panel of arbitrators decides between Hunter Pence's $6.9MM asking price and the Astros' $5.15MM offer today or Monday, all of the 160-plus arbitration eligible players in baseball will have contracts for 2011. About one eighth of them – 21 – have agreed to multiyear extensions, as MLBTR's Arb Tracker shows.

The diverse group of extension recipients included both reigning MVPs (Josh Hamilton and Joey Votto) and the 2010 MLB home run champion (Jose Bautista). Only six of the 21 extensions came from the American League and the Blue Jays were the lone AL team to extend two arbitration eligible players (Bautista and Rajai Davis).

The Cubs (Sean Marshall and Carlos Marmol), Rockies (Jason Hammel and Matt Lindstrom) and Reds (Votto, Jay Bruce and Johnny Cueto) all extended multiple players in the Senior Circuit*.

Bautista ($64MM) signed for the most guaranteed money, followed by Dan Uggla ($62MM) and Jay Bruce ($51MM). Bruce (six years) signed for the most years, followed by Uggla and Bautista, who both signed for five.

No arbitration eligible catchers signed extensions (Geovany Soto was one potential candidate), but the other positions were well-represented. Five starting pitchers, four relief pitchers, four outfielders, three second basemen, two shortstops, two first basemen and Bautista, a third baseman/outfielder, composed the group of 21 recipients.

Extension season is far from over, though. Nine players signed extensions between this date in 2010 and Opening Day, so we could still see a number of deals in Spring Training. Pre-arbitration eligible pitchers such as Clay Buchholz and Trevor Cahill will be among the names to watch once Pence signs and all of the year's arbitration eligibles are under contract. 

*Carlos Gonzalez and Troy Tulowitzki were not arbitration eligible this offseason, though they signed extensions.

Full Story | 4 Comments | Categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

4 Comments on "21 Extensions For Arbitration Eligible Players"

4 years 6 months ago

Point of order: Votto wasn’t extended at all.

4 years 6 months ago

same for hamilton

4 years 6 months ago

Yes they were…may have been arb eligible but were not under contract until extended. Extension doesn’t have to mean FA years were bought.

4 years 6 months ago

I think that’s exactly what it means (respectfully, though). Hamilton and Votto were both under contract to play for their respective teams even though they were arbitration eligible. They are not contractually obligated to play for those teams any longer now, they just have guaranteed monetary compensation.