Headlines

  • Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez
  • Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff
  • Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Bobby Jenks Passes Away
  • Braves Release Alex Verdugo
  • Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2025 Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

No More Personal Service Deals & Milestone Bonuses

By Ben Nicholson-Smith | April 20, 2012 at 11:13am CDT

Major League Baseball and the MLB Players Association have agreed to put an end to personal service deals and milestone bonus clauses, ESPN.com's Jayson Stark reports. Existing contracts with these deals or bonuses won’t be affected by the changes, which were agreed to this month.

Albert Pujols and Ryan Zimmerman recently signed long-term contracts which include personal services provisions and Alex Rodriguez has milestone bonuses associated with his contract. However, MLB and the union say these bonuses violate baseball’s collective bargaining agreement. The sides have agreed that the CBA doesn’t allow players to agree to deals that include obligations beyond their playing careers.

MLB is trying to prevent teams from finding loopholes that enable them to evade the luxury tax, Stark reports. Personal service deals and milestone bonuses aren’t considered guaranteed money and therefore don’t count against the luxury tax.

Share 2 Retweet 16 Send via email0

Collective Bargaining Agreement Los Angeles Angels New York Yankees Washington Nationals Albert Pujols Alex Rodriguez Ryan Zimmerman

AL East Notes: Nunez, Valentine, Hutchison
Main
Baseball Blogs Weigh In: Giants, Damon, Red Sox
View Comments (42)
Post a Comment

42 Comments

  1. MrBaseball29

    13 years ago

    Maybe they’ll cancel arods contract

    Reply
    • wickedkevin

      13 years ago

      Maybe Arod didn’t do steroids. 

      Reply
      • Sean Ryan

        13 years ago

        or Manny Ramirez or David Ortiz…

        Reply
        • Dave_in_Gainesville

          13 years ago

           I don’t understand why Arod is singled out like this, or all of baseball if it comes to that. Nobody who says they love football gets shouted-down at the restaurant over Leon Lett. Is it that football players are supposed to be juiced-up monsters, or is it that we love to hate people who are better than we are, and most football players (and even some baseball players) clearly don’t qualify?

          Reply
          • jjs91

            13 years ago

            It’s really confusing i mean when pudge retired did you here steriods being discussed? Even though canseco said he did them. Yet bagwell who has no proof against him. 

            Reply
          • Dante DeStefano

            13 years ago

            He’s singled out because he was the best player in baseball, he has an arrogant, snobby persona, and he’s possibly going to break records, in part, because of steroids.

            Reply
          • Infield Fly

            13 years ago

            Is it that…we love to hate people who are better than we are…?

            Unless that was just poor wording and you are actually referring to sports ability specifically, how unfortunate that you think of professional athletes as “better than we are.” If anything they have shown themselves to be just as human as the rest of us; subject to the same ups and downs and flaws – particularly those who attempt to cheat to get ahead in life.

            Reply
            • Lunchbox45

              13 years ago

              well said

              Reply
    • Runtime

      13 years ago

      Not likely.

      Reply
  2. Ricardo Elorza del Valle

    13 years ago

    So… if I’m reading this correctly, every incentive based contract is next?  Or those actually count against the luxury tax?

    If so, I think that’s a tragedy.

    Reply
    • Stuart Brown

      13 years ago

      Milestones aren’t so much an incentive as they are an inevitability for some of these guys. If they stay healthy, that money is practically guaranteed, and therefore aids the teams in avoiding the luxury tax.

      Reply
      • Havok9120

        13 years ago

         Ehhh. “If they stay healthy” is incredibly important though. ARod, for instance, can get to the all time record without too much trouble IF that hip and that knee allow him to generate power and remain on the field. And whether or not that contract is financially worth it to the franchise will depend heavily on how far up the list he goes.

        Reply
        • LazerTown

          13 years ago

          Yep, they will make a ton of money if he gets into the 700’s, making his contract worthwhile in marketing incentives alone.

          Reply
          • Havok9120

            13 years ago

             Yeah, and it would be the second time we’ve done it. You should see the attendance jump in the mid-aughts when he first showed up and then when we re-upped him. The teams were getting worse and more people were going.

            Reply
    • baseball1010

      13 years ago

      Incentives are actual pay earned and count against the luxury tax.

      Reply
      • Too Many Idiots

        13 years ago

        Based on what? Just because you said so? If it was that clear cut, do you not think it would be reported by the media?

        Reply
        • baseball1010

          13 years ago

          Because the media doesn’t report it means what? They can’t discover the information? The MLBPA reports it as total salary for the player. That’s what it’s based upon.

          Sent from my iPad

          Reply
          • Too Many Idiots

            13 years ago

            Actually, I owe you an apology. I was thinking milestone, not incentives, as you wrote. You are correct on incentives.

            Reply
  3. Christopher McElroy

    13 years ago

    No more Personal Services? Does that mean clauses like Roy Oswalts Tractor clause?

    Reply
    • M_Harden

      13 years ago

      Haha or Burnett and his limo.

      Reply
  4. Ty 3

    13 years ago

    So, will this affect things like vesting options based on plate appearances/pitching appearances/games finished/etc.? 

    Reply
    • j6takish

      13 years ago

       Those are incentives. Milestones are things like HR Plateaus and such, which were already a bit controversial

      Reply
      • Havok9120

        13 years ago

         To who? Other than the MLBPA and the League’s financial dudes, that is?

        I mean, I’ve never even heard THEM grumble about it too much.

        Reply
      • NatsLady 2

        13 years ago

        Incentives aren’t “guaranteed” money, either, by definition.  This whole thing is very puzzling to me.

        Maybe they should assess the luxury tax on the actual salaries paid in the previous year (after incentives, bonuses, etc.).

        And do playoff bonuses count????

        Also, I don’t think the Nats motive in the personal services contract was to evade the luxury tax, but rather to avoid keeping an aging player on the active roster.  It seems to me that if RZ was willing to defer his money for that number of years and take it after retirement, what is the issue with that?   

        Reply
        • jb226 2

          13 years ago

          What’s the issue with the actual service contract?  Nothing.

          The problem is that it allows a team to guarantee a player money–in your words, to defer his money for that number of years–and yet not have that money counted against the team in the luxury tax.  It’s a loophole allowing a team to guarantee (luxury) tax-free money.

          Was removing the ability to make those deals at all a ham-fisted solution?  Probably.  I don’t see why they couldn’t just amortize it over the life of the contract since a personal services deal IS guaranteed money — it’s just not for playing.

          Reply
      • Ty 3

        13 years ago

        Yeah, but it seems like there’s not necessarily a clear line that separates “incentives” from “milestones” – so if they’re going to disallow one but not the other, they’re going to need a strict definition of what makes a “milestone” different from an “incentive”. I’d be interested to see where that line is drawn.

        For example, let’s say in Hypothetical Land that A-Rod is a free agent and is exactly 30 HR away from Bonds’ record. Does this new rule mean that a team couldn’t sign him to a contract that says “We’ll pay you $6 million extra if you tie Bonds’ record,” because that constitutes a “milestone” clause, but they COULD sign him to a contract that says “We’ll pay you $6 million extra if you hit at least 30 HR this year,” which would be an “incentive”? They’d both mean the exact same thing, but would one be allowed? It’s pretty murky to me.

        Reply
    • NatsLady 2

      13 years ago

      This was my question also.  Our pitcher, Wang, has an incentive-loaded contract due to injury-history.

      Reply
    • Encarnacion's Parrot

      13 years ago

      I don’t think removing incentive-laden deals is the right move. Making all money count against the luxury tax makes some sense to me though.

      Reply
      • Ty 3

        13 years ago

        Totally agree with this. If they want to prevent these clauses from being used to cheat the luxury tax, I think it’d be more effective to just say that ALL money spent on players counts against the luxury tax rather than limiting the ways in which teams can offer money to their players.

        Reply
        • Havok9120

          13 years ago

          Eh. That’d be ideal, sure, but how  can you argue that a team has “spent” money when its a clause that won’t kick in for 8 years IF IT EVER DOES.

          If you do it that way, you have to start doing luxury tax refunds when the incentives don’t kick in.

          Reply
  5. Gary 12

    13 years ago

    He admitted to using steroids to Peter Gammons

    Reply
  6. jb226 2

    13 years ago

    Hmm.  My understanding is that any money that gets earned counts toward the luxury tax.  I do wish I’d see something authoritative on the luxury tax; I think it would make a really nice MLBTR feature.  

    That said, the personal services thing definitely avoids the tax so I understand where that ban came from.

    I was trying to figure out what the difference would be between milestones and incentives from the luxury tax perspective.  At first I didn’t see one; it seems like they both should have the same effect on the luxury tax.  As I  thought about it though, one difference might be the time frame.  Incentives are typically for a season.  IE, you make 30 starts and you get $X more.  The exception would be complex options that can vest based on multi-year performance, but that still ends up with a single number getting added to a single season.  Milestones, by contrast, are things in the future.  As such, they have no bearing on the current year’s luxury tax but present a problem if they get earned: Do you charge luxury tax based on (milestone value) / (total years of contract)?  Do you charge based on (milestone value) / (years left on the contract when earned)?  Or maybe (milestone value) applied to the next luxury tax period after it is earned?  Those options all have vastly different effects.

    It’s a bit of a stretch, honestly, but that’s the only non-semantic difference I could come up with in terms of affecting the luxury tax.  It does seem that milestones allows a team to directly pay for success, which is typically not allowed in baseball–that’s why we see incentives for things like plate appearances or games closed yet not hits or saves–but that is more of an issue with adhering to the rules than it is avoiding the luxury tax.

    Reply
    • baseball1010

      13 years ago

      Vesting options are salary. Example-Krod with the Mets/Brewers. If he had x amount of games finished his option for the 2012 season vested.

      Reply
  7. boomer1344

    13 years ago

    what about the award and all star appearance bonuses? might as well include signing bonuses

    Reply
  8. mitch

    13 years ago

    how’s this for a scenario: Albert Pujols fnishes his career as an Angel and five years later goes straight in the HOF.  Since he started his career as a Cardinal, spent his prime years there and spent more years there there is an StL logo on his plaque. But, because of his personal services contract with Anahiem he’s IS NOT allowed to appear in St. Louis in a ceremony honoring is induction.  How’s that for a slap in the face to the people the made him hundreds of millions of dollars.

    Reply
    • NickinIthaca

      13 years ago

       I thought STL only paid him one hundred million dollars – the Angels are the ones paying him hundreds of millions of dollars

      Reply
    • Too Many Idiots

      13 years ago

      If he retires after his current contract, he would have 11 seasons with St L and 10 with the Angels. When time is split that evenly, the player has the choice of which hat to wear. As far as the personal services contract prohibiting him from appearing, well, that’s just absurd and wouldn’t be allowed by MLB.

      Reply
  9. MB923

    13 years ago

    I could have sworn that this was done a few years ago

    Reply
    • mitch

      13 years ago

      A-rod has “marketing” clauses in his contract for 700, 750, and 800 homers.

      Reply
      • Too Many Idiots

        13 years ago

        Those numbers are not even close. Do not state facts unless you know the facts.

        Reply
  10. graham montgomery

    13 years ago

    This is a clear case of the media confusing terms.  Milestone bonuses do not count against the CURRENT year (say, 2012 instead of a milestone that *may* happen in 2014 or 2015), because generally the entire contract is averaged on a yearly basis.  However, whenever any amount of money is actually earned, it DOES count against that year’s luxury tax number.  The CBA has always been clear on this:

    (4) Performance, Award and Other Bonuses

    (a) Any amounts that are actually earned by a Player as Performance Bonuses, Award Bonuses or any other bonuses properly
    included in a Uniform Player’s Contract shall be included as part of
    the Player’s Salary in the Contract Year in which the service or per-
    formance giving rise to the Bonus was provided. 

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

    Top Stories

    Nationals Fire PBO Mike Rizzo, Manager Dave Martinez

    Brewers Activate Brandon Woodruff

    Clarke Schmidt Expected To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Bobby Jenks Passes Away

    Braves Release Alex Verdugo

    Top 40 Trade Candidates For The 2025 Deadline

    Rays Reinstate Ha-Seong Kim

    Yankees Have Shown Interest In Ryan McMahon

    Royals Interested In Bryan Reynolds

    Rangers Option Josh Jung

    Kevin Pillar Announces Retirement

    Braves Place Spencer Schwellenbach On IL With Elbow Fracture

    Giants Exercise 2026 Option On Manager Bob Melvin

    Yordan Alvarez Shut Down Due To Setback With Hand Injury

    Astros Place Jeremy Peña On Injured List With Fractured Rib

    Tucker Barnhart To Retire

    Tyler Mahle To Be Sidelined Beyond Trade Deadline

    Reds Release Jeimer Candelario

    Dave Parker Passes Away

    Griffin Canning Diagnosed With Ruptured Achilles

    Recent

    A.J. Preller Discusses Padres’ Deadline Outlook

    Orioles Outright Luis F. Castillo

    Angels, Brandon Drury Agree To Minor League Deal

    Giants’ Erik Miller Diagnosed With UCL Sprain

    D-Backs Place Shelby Miller On Injured List With Forearm Strain

    Dodgers To Activate Tyler Glasnow On Wednesday

    Giants Re-Sign Logan Porter To Minor League Deal

    Padres Activate Yu Darvish

    Dodgers Designate CJ Alexander For Assignment

    Phillies Re-Sign Nabil Crismatt To Minor League Deal

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • Sandy Alcantara Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Alex Bregman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android App Store Google Play

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • Trade Deadline Outlook Series
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    Do not Sell or Share My Personal Information

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version