Email a copy of 'Examining The Carlos Quentin Extension' to a friend
Loading ...
By Ben Nicholson-Smith | at
Email a copy of 'Examining The Carlos Quentin Extension' to a friend
MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com
hide arrows scroll to top
Demaroth
I’m not sure it is fair to assume that the only reason the Padres gave him an extension is because he lacked trade value. He’s a San Diego native that has already turned into a fan favorite. Byrnes had reportedly received approval to negotiate with Quentin and Street from both Moores and the O’Malley group. They’re looking to provide some continuity on and off the field and stability to the lineup, and keep fans happy. If those reasons weren’t involved, they could have just not signed him to an extension at all and also they wouldn’t have provided a full no-trade clause.
Is the market weak for both players? Absolutely. But it’s not the only reason they signed him.
marinest21
Fowler and the O’Malley group needed to demonstrate that they have a willingness to invest in this team, not just to make a buck. Like it or not, this deal signifies they are ready to make that choice. Let’s just hope the attitude sticks and it resonates with the fans.
snapcase8p
He still would have looked good behind Cabby and Prince in Delmon’s spot for the rest of this year. Congrats on finally being able to extend pieces that your FO thinks will help you guys be consistent contenders in the future Padres!
cjmsd
The Padres had one of the lowest payrolls in baseball with Carlos this year at $7 million. Giving him almost $10 million a year does not change the fact that they are still one of the lowest payroll teams.
If Houston Street walks after this year there is another $7 million freed up. Even if they Extend Houston and give him 3 years at $10 million like Carlos they would still be in the $60 million dollar payroll range along with Pittsburgh and Kansas City.
This doesn’t do anything to signify that new ownership is willing to spend money. Signing some one to a 5 or 6 year deal worth $80 million, that is spending money.
Thomas Briggs
Signing someone to a 5 or 6 year deal is also super stupid, so good point! Yay O’Malley group for not being stupid!
GasLampGuru
The Padres just cant win, no matter what they do. This should be a sign to fans that the team is willing to do what it must to keep its key players in San Diego. Word is, they are also working on extensions for Volquez and Street. I have a feeling their asking price for Headley will prove too high, and they will wind up extending him, too. Let’s say, for arguments sake, they extend Quentin, Headley, Volquez and Street – and add Maybin and Leubke to that list. Now the core of their team is locked up for at least 3 years. That is something that should give all Padres fans hope.
The Padfather
Thought I saw on Gaslamp blog that Pads are trying to extend Headley too. With all the good young players coming to use as depth that seems best idea. Extend Headley, Volquez and Street for 3 and go for an NL West title. Its in reach.
Brandon Cline
Because I’m a pessimistic Padres fan of 23 years, I can’t help but see this turn into Brian Giles 2.0. Someone riddled with injuries riding pine and making $10MM. If we had a lot more coin, I wouldn’t be as opposed to this as I am now. CQ already lost six weeks of the season initially. That should have been a red flag to anyone. CQ would have been a fit on the Rays since they BADLY need DH help.
I see from where other teams are coming. Is the rent price of CQ really worth to contending teams? Most likely not.
marinest21
I think the biggest difference in terms of GIles v. Quentin is age. We got Giles during his age 32-33 season, whereas Quentin is just 30. It may not seem like a big deal, but Quentin his entering his prime whereas we signed Giles knowing full well he would be going into decline.
TheReturnOfMrBlanks
That and Giles was juicing and Carlos is not. One thing about Giley though man he could walk like no other lol
Amish_willy
Exactly! The three year deal the Padres gave Giles (for the same money Quentin got) covered his age 35-37 compared to Quentin’s age 30-32 seasons.
marinest21
i think you posted something along these lines previously. nice logic, my friend.
The Padfather
Havent looked but didnt Giles play nearly every game every season? That is problem I have with Quentin. He is constantly hurt.
Ed John Rambo
Giles was a productive player for the padres until the end.
The Padfather
Looking at his stats. He came back May 28th. Nearly 2 months after opening day. Has missed 59 games total including tonight.
Miles Mitchell DC
Wouldn’t an extension increase Quentin’s trade value? If a team can’t get prospects for a rent a player they should get more value for a guy that’s signed. You would think there would be a lot of sign and trades. If you have a guy that’s going to be a FA and has trade value, sign him for to a lowball option with a monster automatic payday if he’s traded. The player gets traded to a playoff team, gets paid well for the next year and is a FA the following year when the team that traded for the player then could get compensation.
GasLampGuru
The contract includes a full no trade clause, according to reports.
TheReturnOfMrBlanks
I’m digging the extension, no matter what the reasons are behind it. Now lets go find a new CF and RF using Street – Denorfia -Headley to make it happen. I’m not sold on Maybin quite yet, him as a 4th guy that has to earn his position back might be good form him.
The Padfather
Padres signed Maybin to 5 year deal. He’s staying.
The Padfather
Quentin missed his first game after signing the extension with…wait for it… a leg injury. LMAO