Email a copy of 'MLB Owners Approve Expanded Replay In 2014' to a friend
Loading ...
By Steve Adams | at
Email a copy of 'MLB Owners Approve Expanded Replay In 2014' to a friend
MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com
hide arrows scroll to top
Junior7188
finally this should have been done years ago, this is going to make baseball even more fun to watch.
Riaaaaaa
I disagree, I’ll miss the arguments!
raltongo 2
I know! No more Lou pinella-esque explosions? Darn!
HolaAmigas
As long as Angel Hernandez is an umpire there will always be arguments. Remember the A’s at Cleveland?
teakayfortoowon
Those five-minute interludes that have almost never accomplished anything? Who wouldn’t miss those?
stl_cards16
Tag plays with the exception of a fielder touching 2nd base on a double play? Why? That was one of the things I was actually looking forward to replay improving.
BravesFan 5
Below is how Sweetspot’s David Schoenfield supported it.
One interesting note is that the phantom double play — a.k.a. “the neighborhood play” — is not being subject to review. Why would that be excluded? It could be an issue of player safety; you don’t want a second baseman standing in there too long to make sure his foot is on the bag and then getting steamrolled by Bryce Harper. Also: It’s a tough play to call, since so many of those are bang-bang plays, with the ball reaching a player’s glove and the foot leaving the bag almost simultaneously.
JamieMoyer
Also, it could have to do with the fact that “ghost tags” of the bag are so commonplace on all levels of the sport that its become generally acceptable for the most part. I know when I was young (centuries ago) I was even taught how to just miss it correctly.
teakayfortoowon
The difficulty of the call is a reason to include it in replay, not exclude it.
With MLB considering banning home plate collisions I hope they can scale back the dangerous slides into second base too. It’ll be a difficult balance to strike but I think the runner should bear more responsibility than they currently do (ie. none) to not contact the fielder.
There’s no reason to slide to the left or right of the base if the fielder is on that side. There’s little benefit to sliding over the base when going feet first. There’s little benefit to not getting as low as you can in a slide. I know it’s important not to put too many restrictions on the runner but breaking a fundamental rule of the game because slides are too dangerous suggests that maybe there should be some restrictions on slides too.
Zeeshan Merchant
Very similar adaptation to cricket
I like it a lot
Tommets
So if a manager challenges the play and it is not overturned, will there be a penalty. Like in the NFL they lose a time-out. Of course, there are no time-outs in baseball. Or will they just not have the right to another challenge?
Jaime Pearson
It says if they lose the 1st challenge, they don’t get the 2nd challenge. If they lose the 2nd I guess there is no penalty.
Jake 23
I suppose that if a manager loses the first challenge they will not have their second challenge. That is their penalty. I suppose the incentive there is that they make sure they are confident of the first challenge, and do not use the, frivolously. As I understand the new rules though, if the umpires feel a play is in need of replay then they can review it regardless of the challenges available,,,
Ryman5000
Hmmm… What would happen on a trapped ball replay if they initially called the batter out and then overturned it? Which base would the batter be awarded? Also, let’s say the opposite is true, and they call it a trap during the live play, and then a runner who is not the batter runs to the next base; upon review, they decide it was a catch…would the runner who advanced then be called out for not tagging, or does he just go back to his previous base? Also, he then would not have had the opportunity to tag had they called it a catch live.
Having said that, I’m all for replay. Just seems like there might still be some questionable elements.
Tommets
There’s alway going to be questions. I’m sure this situation his come up before when a manager argued the call and the umpires called it a catch. It’s not like the situations are new. It’s just the replay and challenges part.
Ley_Z 2
Wow. This is surprisingly well done. Meaningful change but not overreaching.
MrSativa
Let’s say I’m skeptical about the entire process.
Selig had a chance to implement a system that causes zero delay in an already slow game. But no. Bud goes cheap and creates the RCC in New York and only adds a couple of extra video Umps.
IMO, he should have added to Umps to every park. The replay team gets every feed including the networks feed. The booth has 30 seconds to review a play. If a decision isn’t reached in 30 seconds then the play on the field stands.
The replay team simply sends a message down to the on field crew Chief was the call was. That way the Chief is always prepared for a Manager challenge. By the time he walks out and asks for a review the Chief will have an answer in seconds barely delaying the game.
Not allowing Home Run calls must have been a Union request to protect Angel Hernandez. In fact, with Angel every call should be reviewed. If they did this they would see just how wrong this guy is.