Headlines

  • Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.
  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Eric Hosmer Has Reportedly Received Multiple 7-Year Offers

By Jeff Todd | January 4, 2018 at 9:43am CDT

9:43am: Sam Mellinger of the Kansas City Star reports that the Royals have not made an offer worth $147MM over seven years to Hosmer, though they remain interested in re-signing him. Mellinger’s report doesn’t specifically refute the length of the offer or that one has been made. Nightengale did stress in yesterday’s report that the length of the offer was confirmed by at least one “high-ranking” member of the Royals, though it’s certainly possible that the overall guarantee has been overstated.

Jan. 4, 9:20am: Boras dismissed Nightengale’s numbers as “inaccurate” when speaking to Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic (subscription required and highly recommended), though he offered no further detail beyond that point. Rosenthal agrees with Nightengale’s assessment that Hosmer is seeking a larger contract both in length and total guarantee, noting that Hosmer is younger than the bulk of free agents that have received contracts of seven or more years in length.

Jan. 3, 1:25pm: San Diego’s offer is at seven years but has not reached $140MM, a source tells Dennis Lin of the San Diego Union-Tribune (via Twitter).

8:25am: The market for Eric Hosmer appears to be heating up, according to a report from Bob Nightengale of USA Today. He cites sources “close to Hosmer” that say the first baseman has received nine-figure offers from both the Padres and the Royals.

San Diego, per the report, has dangled a seven-year deal at a healthy $140MM price tag — about $20MM more than had previously been suggested. But the incumbent Kansas City club is said to have topped that bid with a contract that would include a $147MM guarantee. Notably, Nightengale says he was able to confirm the length of the proposed contract terms with both organizations.

Entering the offseason, MLBTR predicted that Hosmer would only be able to secure a six-year guarantee at a $132MM price tag. That said, we noted that the 28-year-old was seeking more and could drive bidding northward if he found a few organizations that placed a particularly high value on his services.

It seems that’s just what has happened, as Hosmer is now evidently sitting on two appealing offers from two small-market teams that aren’t even expected to contend in 2018. The Royals, of course, are quite familiar with the first baseman and obviously feel his value outstrips the assessment of measures such as wins above replacement. And it seems that’s an opinion shared by the Pads, who must see Hosmer as a potential building block for a young roster that’s expected to bloom in the coming seasons.

For Kansas City, bringing back the team’s core star would not necessarily mean pushing the pedal down for 2018. Rather, the club has indicated throughout the winter that it’ll be drawing back payroll and looking to reload. But such a move would surely impact the team’s overall planning for the coming seasons and might impact its willingness to trade longer-term assets such as Danny Duffy.

Meanwhile, the Padres — whose interest has long been known — would clearly need to bump Wil Myers back into the outfield to make room for Hosmer. Making this deal might also mean dealing away some other assets to make the roster work, though again a signing wouldn’t necessarily be accompanied by other win-now moves. San Diego did recently pick up a short-term veteran at shortstop in Freddy Galvis, though that move is hardly a committing one and the team has mostly endeavored to fill its gaps with low-cost signings. It’s doubtful the organization would drastically alter its timeline in other areas, though certainly adding such a significant salary to the payroll would have a major impact on the options moving forward.

Notably, Hosmer is not just assessing which of these two contracts to take at this point. Rather, Nightengale says that Hosmer and his agent, Scott Boras, are “seeking at least an eight-year or nine-year deal.” Whether or not there’s further room for those offers to grow is not immediately clear, and it’s not entirely evident whether any other teams will enter the bidding in earnest. (The Cardinals have recently been suggested as having ongoing interest, though.) Regardless, it seems that Hosmer is in position to secure a massive contract that meets or exceeds most expectations.

Share 0 Retweet 31 Send via email0

Kansas City Royals Newsstand San Diego Padres Eric Hosmer

NL West Notes: Dahl, D-Backs, Padres
Main
Dillon Gee To Sign With Japan’s Chunichi Dragons
View Comments (348)
Post a Comment

348 Comments

  1. tigergreg

    7 years ago

    If true, they’ll regret it.

    37
    Reply
    • twocentgm

      7 years ago

      Yes regretful. Please stay away Cardinals.

      5
      Reply
      • paulnewman

        7 years ago

        Numbers leaked by Boras, unconfirmed by teams.

        19
        Reply
        • paulnewman

          7 years ago

          Remember the reported 5 year/110 offer to James Shields in first week of January. Only for him to sign at 4 year/75.

          14
          Reply
        • RedFeather

          7 years ago

          Exactly.. He probably has a 5 year $75 million offer in hand so Boras is telling the world that multiple teams are starting a bidding war. This dude is unreal

          9
          Reply
        • H.E. Pennypacker

          7 years ago

          Unreal indeed but he’ll find a sucker to buy into it and Hosmer will get a deal that a 2 WAR a season 1B who doesn’t hit for power definitely doesn’t deserve.

          16
          Reply
        • KnicksCavsFan

          7 years ago

          article says the length was confirmed by both teams.

          1
          Reply
        • stevewpants

          7 years ago

          You’ve screwed me again Pennypacker!

          4
          Reply
        • teufelshunde4

          7 years ago

          Love him or hate him it’s his job to get his clients paid. Boras is very good at his job.

          26
          Reply
        • H.E. Pennypacker

          7 years ago

          So there is no waterfall grotto?

          1
          Reply
        • stevewpants

          7 years ago

          Yummm Machu Pichu

          1
          Reply
        • kcusgnikcufsregdod

          7 years ago

          I believe this

          Reply
        • arc89

          7 years ago

          Must be a team he doesn’t want to play for. Why wouldn’t you take a 7 year deal unless the amount is very low. Could be option years attached to make it 7 years.

          1
          Reply
        • nichols1105

          7 years ago

          False

          Reply
        • blackleather

          7 years ago

          SD offered 120 mill…not 140. This is Boras, at work. And SD would NEVER offer 140 mill, for 8-9 yrs. It’s not in their DNA to be that kind of “big dog”. I’ve been a fan for most of my life, and when they knew Adrian Gonzalez was probably going to want 150 mill, in free agency, they traded him.

          If Hosmer is smart, he’ll take the 120, before he becomes another Shields…Spring is right around the corner.

          7
          Reply
        • jeralves79

          7 years ago

          Phillies just paid the same money ($20 mil/yr) for Santana. Chris Davis hit for power, did he deserve that contract? Of course not.
          Roughly $20 mil/year for Hosmer in his prime years and everything he brings (solid average, decent power, great defense, intangibles, etc.) isn’t a bad deal at all.

          3
          Reply
        • jeralves79

          7 years ago

          Boras wouldn’t release $ numbers, never has. He cuts his own throat if he tells teams where the market is at, better to keep them in the dark.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          No, Nightengale claims that it was confirmed by both teams.

          Nightengale was also the guy that said that Shields had a 5 year $110 million deal in hand shortly before he signed for 4 years and $75 million with the Padres a few years ago.

          5
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          @jeralves79 OK Scott. We have now figured out one of the accounts Boras uses on this board.

          4
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          @jeralves79 Boras publicly releases figures all the time. There are two interviews this year including one with Jim Duquette where he released exactly what teams had offered for his still unsigned clients.

          5
          Reply
        • chgobangbang

          7 years ago

          Boras pissed big market teams that he’s used in the past to bid against each other are silent this year in FA aka yanks Red Sox tigers cub rangers etc

          2
          Reply
        • vpolite

          7 years ago

          Nightengale also said the Giants would land Stanton.

          7
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          7 years ago

          Great defense? Decent power? He’s so overated ! Cards please stay away ! He’s not worth even $15 million a year!

          5
          Reply
        • dynamite drop in monty

          7 years ago

          I’ve decided to build a roller coaster instead.

          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          Still wouldn’t be as many as you use.

          2
          Reply
        • CardsNation5

          7 years ago

          Sorry, but you’re wrong. Boras never leaks numbers. That’s not his style

          Reply
        • harlanstone

          7 years ago

          While I generally agree with you, Kendrys Morales does not.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          @CardsNation5 Go listen to Boras’ interview with Jim Duquette on MLB Network Radio.

          4
          Reply
        • WubbaLubbaDubDub

          7 years ago

          The “same money” argument doesn’t apply when you are comparing a three year deal to a seven year deal.

          3
          Reply
        • aggee10

          7 years ago

          Thank you finally someone besides me knows why boras does what he does.

          Reply
        • GregF

          7 years ago

          Agreed. Any organization will not compete for long making decisions like that,

          Reply
    • CursedRangers

      7 years ago

      This is starting to remind me of the Chris Davis albatross of a contract. Was absurd at the time it was signed and even more absurd as time has passed. Some team is going to regret this big time.

      18
      Reply
      • User 2997803866

        7 years ago

        No way this is as bad as Davis. Davis is a one way player, power. Hosmer hits for average, gets on base, is a smart player, better defensively than the metrics suggests, hits for power. His age curve also profiles better than most players. This has Freddie Freeman breakout written all over it. Not sure why people have on Hosmer so much. The contract will be well deserved.

        3
        Reply
        • bjsguess

          7 years ago

          Glad you cleared that up about his defense. EVERY defensive metric agrees that he is between average and terrible. But you can now definitively state that your eyeball test supercedes all that. And please … please … don’t cite his Gold Gloves. You might want to lend your endorsement to the Boras camp. He can throw that into the binder.

          And his age curve … what insight exactly do you have that Hosmer will age better than his peers?

          And finally, super curious about the Freeman comps. Since 2013, Freeman has posted a wRC+ of AT LEAST 132. Since 2013 Hosmer has posted a wRC+ of AT LEAST 1 time. Hosmer’s best offensive year in the past 5 years is a smidge above Freeman’s worst year in that same time frame. They are both the same age. What in the world are you seeing that the rest of the world is missing?

          16
          Reply
        • bosox90

          7 years ago

          So what new information did you provide is with about Hosmer’s defense? Can you explain to me exactly how every defensive metric is calculated, or do you just know what is considered good and bad and trust that they tell the entire story? Sabremetrics can be extremely helpful and have their place in the game, but man have they become such a lazy crutch for people who want to sound like they know what they are talking about.

          6
          Reply
        • notagain27

          7 years ago

          You are exactly right. How is UZR calculated? Field is divided into quadrants and if you catch a ball in that quadrant, you get x amount of credit. Doesn’t say if you were standing in that spot when you made the play or if you had to run 5 steps. The Guy helps you Win games by doing things that don’t show up in the box score or on a computer screen. People who do these evaluations for a living understand his value and that is why we are reading about these offers. And I’m aware that agents can fabricate false reports to writers thirsty for a story this time of year.

          3
          Reply
        • jleve618

          7 years ago

          I’ve heard the people at fangraphs go on record saying they think the metrics on him are off.

          1
          Reply
        • Dock_Elvis

          7 years ago

          Freddie Freeman breakout written on it? Unlikely…I think we just saw peak season. You have him basically becoming Joey Votto…it’s not in the tank

          1
          Reply
        • CardsNation5

          7 years ago

          Facts

          Reply
      • hiflew

        7 years ago

        Hosmer is a lot better than the “one note” Chris Davis. If you want to make a Jason Heyward comparison, it might make more sense. But Hosmer is a lot better than Davis. Baltimore was just foolish in bidding with themselves.

        3
        Reply
      • DannyQ3913

        7 years ago

        Hahaha. Davis isn’t a 4 time gold glover and doesn’t hit like Hosmer.

        Reply
        • badco44

          7 years ago

          Gee and how many k’s does Davis contribute?

          Reply
    • bastros88

      7 years ago

      they won’t regret it for the first couple of seasons, but later on in the contract they will. If Hosmer can keep putting up numbers like he did last year than its a good deal

      Reply
      • CursedRangers

        7 years ago

        He has been fluctuating over the last several years. One great year, followed by one so-so year. Over the past four years he has averaged just over a 2 WAR.

        6
        Reply
        • kenneth cole

          7 years ago

          WAR isn’t a concrete number. Just use slash lines and ratios… I know it makes you feel smarter but yeah, literally an ever changing number.

          6
          Reply
        • bastros88

          7 years ago

          there is no way to calculate a players WAR, or even true worth. And if 1 win is valued at around 6 or 7 million, then this is a pretty good deal. He’s young enough to hand out 7 years as well.

          4
          Reply
        • therealryan

          7 years ago

          You can use slash lines and he still is inconsistent and not a top tier 1B. Over the past 3 seasons, Hosmer has a 120 wRC+, which is good for 11th among 1B. For comparison, that slots him in between J. Bour (123 wRC+), C. Davis (120), L. Duda (119) and C. Santana (118). He has a pretty long way to go to reach Brandon Belt at 131, which is funny because many here think he is overpaid at 4 years and $17mm/season.

          9
          Reply
        • User 2997803866

          7 years ago

          Kenneth Cole wins.

          2
          Reply
        • CursedRangers

          7 years ago

          WAR doesn’t make me feel any smarter. It’s one of many ways to judge a player. People are talking about how great he was last year (and he was), but the year prior not so much. I was making a point about how up and down he is year in and year out. Sorry you weren’t smart enough to pick up on that.

          8
          Reply
        • jeralves79

          7 years ago

          He’s much better defensively than those guys and a guy you can build around for the next 7 years.
          Hosmer is significantly better than Belt, not even close.

          Reply
        • bjsguess

          7 years ago

          Huh?

          What statistic doesn’t change? What statistic isn’t fluid?

          Let me help you here. WAR DOES NOT use slash lines. Your BA, OBP, and SLG are not factored into the calculation.

          I can only guess that you say WAR isn’t concrete because you don’t understand how it is calculated. That’s fine. It is a little complicated. But before you come in here and tell the world that RBI’s are the most important stat you might want to do a little reading on why WAR has become a useful shorthand to discuss value. Note – it’s not the ONLY tool available but it superior using a triple slash, SB’s, and errors to rate a player.

          7
          Reply
        • bastros88

          7 years ago

          Eric Hosmer has different WARS on a ton of different baseball websites, such as fangraphs, and baseball reference. WAR is a worthless stat,and there is truly no way to understand a players true value.

          4
          Reply
        • Coast1

          7 years ago

          One win was worth $4.6 million in 2017. If you’re paying $6 or $7 million per win you’re not going to win your division.

          Reply
        • cowdisciple

          7 years ago

          Curious where you got that $4.6m number. I suspect it includes the MLB serfs making league minimum in their first three years and also underpaid arb-eligible guys.

          The going rate for a win on the free agent market is about 8m. You can’t build a good team from free agents, but one or two good ones can push a cost controlled core up to the next level…

          10
          Reply
        • Coast1

          7 years ago

          I took total WAR in 2017 divided by total $ spent. The $ spent number is inflated since it includes buy outs that is really deferred money from the previous year. Also, relief pitchers’ contributions are valued higher than their WAR suggests, so they usually have a much higher WAR cost than position players and starting pitchers. So the actual number is lower. Maybe $4 million?

          I know you got your number from Fangraphs. I don’t know how they derive it. Edwin Encarnacion cost $5.4 for each 1 2016 WAR. Ian Desmond cost $5.1 million for each 1 2016 WAR. Dexter Fowler got $3.9 million. Matt Joyce cost $3.2 million. Carlos Beltran did get $8 million per WAR but a one year deal is likely to cost more.

          This year Welington Castillo has gotten $3.5 million per WAR. Yonder Alonso has got $4.2 million. Carlos Santana has gotten $5.9 million. Zach Cozart cost $2.6 million per WAR.

          Any GM paying $7 or $8 million per WAR would be a real chump.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          Which makes him worth $16 million per season or just over. That is why Boras has had to harp on the “intangibles’ so much with Hosmer. He is not worth the money Boras is asking.

          8
          Reply
        • Geebs

          7 years ago

          Reading what you wrote indicates you haven’t a clue about WAR.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          One win of WAR was worth $8.25 million for FA signed after the 2016 season. The value of a point of WAR is only calculated for players that are free agents. Most other players are not free to negotiate their salary so that is not included in value of a point of WAR. We have no idea how much it will be worth for 2017 until all the FA are signed.

          5
          Reply
        • Geebs

          7 years ago

          Hosmer has a WAR value on BR & FG not “a ton of sites” it’s 2 and the difference between them is how they calculate defensive value. Don’t be ignorant and do some reading if you don’t understand the stat which you clearly don’t.

          7
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          Which is why you are totally wrong Coast. The value of a point of WAR in determining Free Agent value is based only on what the free agents signed for. For the FA that signed after the 2016 season that was 8.25 million. That is the value of a point of WAR currently. Looking at the FA that have signed so far this offseason, it will go up to over $9 million.

          5
          Reply
        • Coast1

          7 years ago

          You’ll need to be more detailed in your explanation. Can you provide me a list of the players you’re citing. I showed the top 2016 position player free agents and their cost per 1 WAR and all of them were lower than $8.25 million. All the ones this year signed for considerably less.

          Are you saying that was the amount of WAR they produced in 2017? I doubt that’s right but even if it is it shouldn’t be relevant. Teams aren’t paying for an injury filled season like Cespedes had. I’ve never heard a GM say, “Oh yeah, we’re planning on him getting injured and not giving us as much.”

          You’re calling me totally wrong, yet provide no data to support your argument. The data supports mine.

          I should add that when the average cost of 1 WAR is less than $4.6 million you’re not going to win much if you’re paying free agents $8-$9 million for 1 WAR.

          Reply
        • Gobbysteiner

          7 years ago

          Hosmer waaay better than belt? Lolol

          6
          Reply
        • Gobbysteiner

          7 years ago

          He is Not defensively or offensively better than belt or Santana

          5
          Reply
        • bastros88

          7 years ago

          I don’t think you understand what WAR is, and it’s foolish to think that it’s a set stat. Wins above replacement is a state that attempts to understand a players true value to a team by looking at defense, base running, and other aspects of the game. It’s an indication of a players worth, it’s no a reliable stat.

          3
          Reply
        • bastros88

          7 years ago

          Hosmer is definitely better than Santana offensively l. Hosmer is about the same player as Belt

          Reply
        • Geebs

          7 years ago

          I can’t keep doing this with ignorant people, never mind I don’t care what you think, go and spread your ignorance.

          1
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          All free agents. That is what the value of a point of WAR is based on in FA compensation.

          It is really simple. Its ONLY free agents. Not players on MLB minimum or guys in arbitration that are not free to negotiate based on market value.

          5
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          7 years ago

          I thought WAR was worth $8million a year ?

          3
          Reply
        • brucewayne

          7 years ago

          Hosmer is too much of a guess hitter to be consistent year after year. That’s why his numbers fluctuate so much!

          4
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          @coast1 Of course. it’s for the WAR they produced in the previous year. So far this year they are FAR over the $8.25 million because relievers are signing for such huge AAV.

          You have no shown no data. If you had you would see that it’s almost exactly $8.25 million and it doesn’t include just position players, it is all free agent players.

          4
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          7 years ago

          The Yankees have a payroll of $200mm. The Rays have about $100mm. The Marlins hope to be at $70mm. Doesnt that effect how much one WAR is worth for each team? Higher payroll teams can pay more. Lower payroll teams cannot.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          The Marlins hope to be at $85-90 million. They are at $104 million currently.
          The value of a point of WAR is determined by the WAR for the previous season and the AAV of contracts signed by free agents in any given offseason.

          For example. the 2016 WAR of all the free agents signed last offseason and the AAV of their contracts equaled an $8.25 million value of a point of WAR for the 2017 season.

          Because most of the FA players have been relievers so far and reliever WAR is very low, the value of a point of WAR so far this offseason is over $10 million. It will go down some, but we have seen inflation in the position players and starting pitchers signed so far, so it won’t go down much. Maybe to $9-9.5 million per point of WAR.

          4
          Reply
        • bluegorilla

          7 years ago

          I think bastros88 was the GM of the Cubs from 1909 until about 2011

          1
          Reply
        • RoyalRich

          7 years ago

          And if you want to sound smarter you might want to stop referring to it as a “triple slash” when it’s not… it’s a “slash” line. There are only 2 slashes, not 3. And for most people that actually look at these things there are several things that are weighted in to evaluating a player, not just 1 thing or 2 things or even 3 things. WAR, slash line, wRC+, OPS+… and yes even defensive metrics are all taken into account. The simple fact is Hosmer isn’t as bad as some make you believe but he’s also nowhere near as good as the Royals try to make it seem. He’s not a superior defender, but he’s not horrible. But the truth is that teams aren’t going to pay millions of extra dollars for a guy that can catch the ball at that position, much like they’re not going to pay millions of extra dollars just because he can smile nicely. If you really want to know why he’s not valued as much as the Royals think he should be… just look at his groundball rate and how bad it is over the years compared to most every other 1B in the league. Hoz can’t get the ball in the air and that’s why he’ll never be as good as most others at hitting it.

          Reply
    • HALOStrout27

      7 years ago

      OVERATED. thats all I have to say.

      Reply
  2. JFactor

    7 years ago

    Just happy it’s not the Cardinals engaged.

    Hosmer is young enough that 7 years isn’t so much an issue. And 20 AAV isn’t so bad either. But I just don’t see enough upside in his game long term.

    11
    Reply
    • kbarr888

      7 years ago

      Way Better ways for the Cards to spend the $160M it would take to lure him there. Cards don’t really NEED him (or his “plethora of ground balls”….)

      Sign Reed……plus a couple of these options….

      Sign Morrison (2/24) instead of Hosmer (Luke Voit is coming….don’t need Hosmer)
      Sign Frazier for 3B (3/39 might do it) and return Gyorko to super utility role
      Sign Lind as a bench power bat (2/18 at the most)
      Bring back Jaime Garcia as back-of-the-rotation insurance (2/16) – maybe

      4
      Reply
      • What

        7 years ago

        No. Just no.

        Reply
      • dazhk

        7 years ago

        Dude, stop eating the shrooms

        Reply
      • jordantm2021

        7 years ago

        I have been saying this all along they should sign reed for a setup man and sign LoMo to play first
        Trade for Colome to be the closer. And then if we can’t pull of a trade for Donaldson then leave Jedd at Third and Carpenter can be super utility

        3
        Reply
        • Vedder80

          7 years ago

          Carpenter is better than Jedd. Anyone who says otherwise is foolish.

          1
          Reply
    • thefenwayfaithful 2

      7 years ago

      Sorry 🙁

      mlb.com/news/cardinals-interested-in-signing-eric-…

      Sounds like they are very involved. But who knows what’s actually true.

      2
      Reply
      • teufelshunde4

        7 years ago

        Here is thing on cards… Their names don’t come up until a deal is done or 95% done. Mo runs a tight FO with little to no leaks of info. Marlins trade stuff was because it was obvious and Mo made it public before the chase began.

        3
        Reply
  3. brewcrew08

    7 years ago

    7yr deal for a guy who is 28? Based on this I feel like he will get 7yr/160M for someone and won’t be worth it.

    1
    Reply
    • halfastros7

      7 years ago

      Y’all are acting like this contract isn’t going to have an opt-out clause in it. Yeah he’ll sign a 7 year deal but there will be an opt-out after the 3rd or 4th year. Hosmer is still young enough that if he performs well then he could opt out. Whoever signs him might only be on the hook for a few seasons.

      1
      Reply
      • tbonenats

        7 years ago

        or they could be the Cubs with Heyward.

        9
        Reply
        • bjsguess

          7 years ago

          Not sure why you were downvoted. You are spot on.

          Opt outs in no way guarantee that the player is going to leave – even if they are young. If they stink, the club is stuck with them. If they play at market rates, the club is likely stuck with them.

          4
          Reply
        • Coast1

          7 years ago

          Players, even stars, usually decline in their early to mid-30’s. It’s impossible to know when that’ll be with each player. Trying to figure that out through age 34 is very risky. It proved that way with consistent guys like Choo, Ellsbury, Crawford, and Werth. Hosmer isn’t consistent.

          One reason I think the market is slow isn’t the AAV players want but the length. Teams don’t want to go more than 3-4 years.

          2
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          It is pretty easy to see when players start to decline. That is starting with their age 30 season. It is also easy to see the rate of decline. It is 7% per year.

          Go to Fangraphs leaderboards and sort league by age. Go through each age and you will see the steady decline starting at age 30. The peak years are age 26-29.

          You can do that for any single year or you can go by multiple years. The rates outside of the steroid era are the same.

          7
          Reply
        • rememberthecoop

          7 years ago

          Ouch. Unnecessary roughness. Drop the flag. Speaking for (many) Cubs fans, that contract will haunt us for awhile. Reminds me of when Theo gave that big deal to Crawford with Boston.

          1
          Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        7 years ago

        abgb123 and brucewayne are correct. Opt out is never team friendly. If Hosmer is playing well enough that he would actually want to opt out then his team would WANT to be on the hook for the back end of his contract.

        3
        Reply
        • Padres2019ha

          7 years ago

          Rocket science

          1
          Reply
    • hiflew

      7 years ago

      A 7 year deal for 28 year old is not really THAT bad. That would end the contract around age 35. For comparison’s sake, Joey Votto’s contract runs through his age 40 season. Albert Pujols’s contract runs through his age 41 season, Miggy’s goes through 40. I am not saying Hosmer is as valuable as any of those guys when they signed. Nor am I saying that those three contract were not mistakes. What I am saying is that is what the market dictates.

      Star players do not get paid their worth for the first few years of their careers, in exchange they get drastically overpaid for the last few years of their careers. It happens with every generation. Yes, Hosmer is likely to become an albatross near the end of the deal. But he is not going to be the only albatross this season, nor will he be the last one in history. It’s what the market dictates.

      Reply
  4. angels in Anaheim

    7 years ago

    I would stick with the Royals if I were him. Padres not going to the playoffs anytime.

    1
    Reply
    • brewcrew08

      7 years ago

      Then again neither is KC if they lose Cain/Moose and a few arms.

      8
      Reply
      • Joseph Anderson

        7 years ago

        pretty much. Without any pitching, R’s are a ways away from making any sort of playoff run with Cleveland around and if Minnesota can repeat their recent success.

        2
        Reply
      • hiflew

        7 years ago

        KC has a much better shot competing in their division than the Padres do in theirs. Cleveland is really the only definite competition. Minnesota could easily go either way. Detroit and Chicago are both rebuilding. It might make sense for KC to try and win the next couple of years before the bigger market White Sox and Tigers get better.

        Reply
    • Chris Sale Amateur Tailor

      7 years ago

      probably closer than KC

      4
      Reply
      • padresfans1111

        7 years ago

        Padres are way closer

        4
        Reply
        • Yankeepatriot

          7 years ago

          The prospects have to come up and produce first. Their future looks brighter than kc indeed but like I said the kids gotta come through. I do like their young talent indeed though

          Reply
    • CursedRangers

      7 years ago

      Factor in the income tax in CA, along with not having to move his family, and KC would seem to make the most sense of the two.

      4
      Reply
      • outinleftfield

        7 years ago

        Figure in that they are reportedly offering more $$$ and the Royals make the most sense.

        Of course, if Nightengale is wrong as usual, then Hosmer will sign elsewhere.

        5
        Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          Looks like Nightengale was wrong as usual. KC said that they didn’t offer 7/147 and even Boras has said Nightengale’s numbers are wrong.

          5
          Reply
    • lowtalker1

      7 years ago

      Neither are the angels. Burn!
      Padres will me making their first push in 2019

      Reply
    • mooshimanx

      7 years ago

      The Padres farm system is very much set up to be competitive within a couple of years. It’s not wrong to say their major league talent isn’t any good (it’s basically all utility guys acting as warm bodies, Wil Myers getting paid too much and Manuel Margot being solid), but the only way your major league talent gets good is from the farm system, and they have a loaded farm system.

      Reply
      • kbarr888

        7 years ago

        moonshimanx….

        Wil Myers has an AAV of $13.8 Million.
        He went 30/20 last year, and 28/28 the year before.
        He’s played 312 of the last 324 Games for the Padres.
        His OPS has been a tick under .800 the last 2 years.

        Why……would you say he is “getting paid too much”…?????

        3
        Reply
    • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

      7 years ago

      They will before the Royals do

      3
      Reply
  5. walls17

    7 years ago

    KC gonna ruin itself for sentimental reasons

    19
    Reply
    • harlanstone

      7 years ago

      Agreed.

      Reply
    • CursedRangers

      7 years ago

      It’s happening way too often in baseball. Joe Mauer, Chris Davis, Stanton, Ryan Braun, etc….

      2
      Reply
      • stevewpants

        7 years ago

        Don’t blame the players blame the system it doesn’t compensate younger players the way it should so they get rewarded for past performance. As a jumping off point, Major league and minor league minimum salaries should be higher.

        8
        Reply
        • davidcoonce74

          7 years ago

          To be fair, all industries pay you based on past performance.

          6
          Reply
      • Solaris601

        7 years ago

        Don’t forget Joey Votto. These mid to small market teams committing a large portion of their payroll to one player – productive or not – kills their flexibility and forces them to constantly shop the bargain bin when other needs arise. Royals are foolish to even be in on Hosmer, but Boras is about as credible as a career used car salesman, so who knows what’s really going on.

        Reply
        • Gobbysteiner

          7 years ago

          Votto is a top 3 hitter in baseball. He’s one if the few who are worth it

          2
          Reply
      • outinleftfield

        7 years ago

        Mauer has actually provided market value for his contract even after being moved to 1B. He has not provided surplus value, but the team didn’t lose in his case like the Tigers and Angels will on Cabrera and Pujol’s deals.

        6
        Reply
      • Jack Taddy

        7 years ago

        While the Braun contract isn’t looking great at this point, it has not even come close to bringing the Brewers to ruin. He’s playing less now, sure. When he plays, though, he’s still going to be pretty solid.

        1
        Reply
    • stymeedone

      7 years ago

      Dont confuse sentiment for ticket sales. Thats the business. The reality is small market teams cant sustain the payroll to compete consistantly, so fans like to see their favorite players and will pay to see them. Even the Yankees kept Jeter around past his usefulness to winning, just to sell tickets. If you dont sell tickets, payroll goes down even more. Real teams and Real GMs make decisions that effect the gate, as well as trying to build a winner.

      1
      Reply
      • hojostache

        7 years ago

        Given the skyrocketing $$ attached to recent TV deals, the $’s from actual gate sales at the ballpark is a drop in the bucket compared to the $ generated through the broadcast rights. There is a relationship between having supportive fans and $, but the economics of it are much more about cable/satellite subscriber #’s because the team gets a cut of every subscriber. There is also advertising sales and other revenue streams connected to teams who own part or all of the channel broadcasting the games, etc.

        For example, the Mets are buried in debt, but because SNY is a cashcow, it brings up the value of the franchise because of the revenue SNY can produce. If the Mets tried to sell to a new owner without including SNY, the sale value would be horrible because of the debt their crooked owners have piled onto the team.

        2
        Reply
        • davidcoonce74

          7 years ago

          Ticket sales have very little to do with payroll. Much of that money never leaves the park, and the visiting team, of course, gets 40% anyway.

          3
          Reply
  6. ChaplinBaseball

    7 years ago

    7 years contracts are not paying dividends anymore, 4 or 5 at most would be sufficient with vesting options along the way.

    1
    Reply
    • brewcrew08

      7 years ago

      I agree. Unless you’re a guy like Harper or Machado who hit Free Agency at 25-26 then 7+ year deals just don’t make sense.

      3
      Reply
      • saintguitar

        7 years ago

        I agree. From a 28-yr old player, you will get probably good 3-4 years (if we are staying optimistic) and you are looking at salary drag for the rest of the contract.

        3
        Reply
      • bernbabybern

        7 years ago

        They will get 10+ year deals.

        2
        Reply
        • bjsguess

          7 years ago

          Agreed.

          You will see longer and longer contracts for superstars as teams become more strategic about the salary cap (excuse me … luxury tax threshold). If you have a superstar that is going to command $40MM/annually and say 10 years ($400MM total), the team may be inclined to do that same $400MM over 13 years. That would drop your cap figure to $31MM annually. The team and player know that the most likely ending for the contract is that player getting cut after year 10. Meanwhile, you structure the deal so that the player still gets paid his $400MM over the first 10 years and then tack on the last 3 years at league minimum. It’s salary deferral to manipulate the cap.

          5
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          7 years ago

          I agree. The new CBA changed how the Competitive Balance Tax (Luxury Tax) is calculated from what a player is being paid in a given year to the AAV of the contract. That gives the high revenue teams an incentive to sign players to a longer contract with a lower AAV. I would not be surprised to see the Yankees, Dodgers, Red Sox, Giants, or Phillies sign Harper or Machado to 13-14 year deals.

          Reply
    • Cardinals17

      7 years ago

      I agree that the long excessively long term contracts should be considered a no-no. History of prior contracts have shown that. Especially with .500 pitchers and slightly above average every day players. Unless an opt out clause is in place mid way through the contract for both parties. A 4-5 year contract with option years and incentives would seem more viable for ownerships and the players. No trade clauses——That’s another problem all together.

      Reply
  7. trace

    7 years ago

    *grab popcorns*

    2
    Reply
  8. braves95 2

    7 years ago

    But Why?.gif

    1
    Reply
  9. nutbunnies

    7 years ago

    AKA “They don’t like the offers/teams”

    Reply
  10. skywalkr2

    7 years ago

    Insanity in the FA market it seems. Whoever signs him will regret it.

    4
    Reply
  11. qbass187

    7 years ago

    I’m glad the Red Sox bowed out.

    5
    Reply
    • iamoldboy

      7 years ago

      Agreed! I’ll take Mitch Moreland any day of the week with these potential financials.

      3
      Reply
      • brucewayne

        7 years ago

        So did Boston! That’s why they resigned him!

        Reply
  12. bucknerforhall

    7 years ago

    KC should take the draft pics.

    Trade Duffy, Soria, & Herera. for 3-5 solid prospects

    and be off & running.

    8
    Reply
    • yukongold

      7 years ago

      Duffy to the Yankees for Frazier, Ellsbury and 20M.

      Reply
      • Hello123

        7 years ago

        Nah

        4
        Reply
      • Hello123

        7 years ago

        Duffy isn’t worth Frazier although you would dumping Ellsbury.

        Reply
      • Hello123

        7 years ago

        Also 40% FB is not good at yankee stadium.

        Reply
        • realgone2

          7 years ago

          Yeah that spells doom in that band box

          Reply
    • Geebs

      7 years ago

      You can’t trade draft pick in MLB except for a few very slim picks which are sandwich round picks

      2
      Reply
      • Geebs

        7 years ago

        *except a few picks that are sandwiched between rounds

        Reply
        • H.E. Pennypacker

          7 years ago

          I think he meant getting the compensatory draft picks for losing Hosmer in free agency; not trading him for picks. He declined his qualifying offer from KC, which means they will get a certain number of these comp picks depending on where he signs and for how much.

          3
          Reply
        • Geebs

          7 years ago

          I think you’re right, bucknerforhall you have my sincerest apologies

          1
          Reply
  13. sandman12

    7 years ago

    Regrettable for the team that gets him – embarrassing for the other team to have made such an offer.

    20
    Reply
  14. Chasssooo

    7 years ago

    KC is better off going into rebuild mode.

    12
    Reply
    • Hello123

      7 years ago

      They should have trade the core of the team and they all left and now they have no future

      3
      Reply
    • Cardinals17

      7 years ago

      KC needs to look at their position realistically. They said this themselves after they won the World Series. All of their star players were hitting free agency at the same time. They are offering contracts with their heart, not their brain. Let Hosmer, Moose and Cain go. Trade Duffy to the Cardinals for some players on the major league roster and a MLB ready prospect pitcher and another lower prospect pitcher. Reload with current young major league talent, prospects from other teams and take the draft picks. The Cardinals have question marks beside Carpenter, Wong and Grichuk. A change of scenery for those players may work out well for both Missouri teams.

      1
      Reply
      • teufelshunde4

        7 years ago

        im a Cardinal fan, but damn dude that was way to self serving of a comment…. lol

        2
        Reply
  15. mizzourah87

    7 years ago

    First off, I’m gonna say that I’m looking at this from a Royals fan perspective… but I actually like this. If they can atleast stay competitive while building the farm, they have a chance at a decent TV deal which is up in 2 or 3 years. If they sell the team and go back to losing 95 – 100 games, it may cost them more than 21m per year that Hosmer will. Hosmer is the face of the franchise, and I think will pay for himself over the next 7 years, and will allow the Royals to at least remain competitive instead of going straight back to the bottom.

    4
    Reply
    • mizzourah87

      7 years ago

      I also don’t think signing Hosmer means you can’t rebuild too. We should still get a couple of comp picks for Moose and Cain, plus the supplemental and 1st round pick means 4 top 50ish picks this year. I like Pratto, MJ Melendez, Matias, and Lee. I don’t see much in the way of pitching but we have some solid prospects to build around.

      3
      Reply
      • Chris Sale Amateur Tailor

        7 years ago

        sorry to break it to you but your farm system is one of the worst in the MLB. and since you don’t have a ton of chips left to trade the only way it’s going to get better is by losing a hundred games and getting top picks

        6
        Reply
        • mizzourah87

          7 years ago

          That’s not breaking news. But what people outside of KC don’t remember is we have young talent either already in KC or in Omaha with multiple years of control that aren’t considered prospects. Bonifacio, Whit, Mondesi, Junis, Soler even. Mix in the few prospects we do have, the presumably 4 top 50 draft picks this year (5 if hosmer signs elsewhere), and be active in the international market, and you can maintain success.

          Reply
        • Geebs

          7 years ago

          Don’t remember? We all have access to the same information as you, FG/BR/BA/TradeRumors etc makes sure of that.
          As for draft picks the most the royals can receive from the 3 players they extended QA’s to is 3 sandwich picks after the first round between the first competitive balance round the 1st and 2nd rounds, which although cool in mlb a guarantee that doesn’t make. Face it, the royals are screwed for the next 5 years but here’s and idea royals fans, stop your whining, you went to 2 WS and won one it’s all worth it, bask in the glory of being WS winners and watch as the youth grows in KC.

          1
          Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        7 years ago

        No, signing Hosmer indeed DOES mean you can’t rebuild.

        2
        Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          7 years ago

          That depends on the team signing Hosmer. A team like the Phillies, Padres, or Twins that have $80-100 million in payroll flexibility could sign him and continue their rebuild. The Royals, Marlins or Rays that are in a place where they need to lower payroll would have a hard time continuing their rebuild if they signed Hosmer.

          Reply
    • bucknerforhall

      7 years ago

      the worst place to be is in the middle .

      they wont be competitive for a playoff spot – but they wont lose 100.

      theyll be stuck in the middle.

      & not get the high picks & pool $$$ that goes with it.

      9
      Reply
      • mizzourah87

        7 years ago

        Yeah I definitely see what you’re saying. But honestly after growing up watching the Royals lose 100 games 3 years in a row and just being horrible. Being mediocre for a little while isn’t the worst thing.

        3
        Reply
        • erikt

          7 years ago

          Only remembering baseball since ’94 and being Blue Jays fan, I can tell you that mediocrity is absolutely terrible. Either compete, or tear it down so you can get ready to compete again.

          5
          Reply
        • jimmyz

          7 years ago

          I’d still take mediocre baseball over 5+ WAR basketball anyday

          1
          Reply
        • Geebs

          7 years ago

          True

          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          Being mediocre is most certainly the worst thing!!!

          3
          Reply
  16. matthew102402

    7 years ago

    Let me get this straight. The “Small Market” Royals are willing to spend 147 million on the first baseman who they got at least six years out of, and him along with guys like Alcides Escobar, Lorenzo Cain, and Mike Moustakas are free agents right now. They finally have a chance to say good bye. But no, that’s not okay. They’d rather spend 147 million, a huge risk on a first baseman, when they should just rebuild? Got it.

    4
    Reply
  17. sufferforsnakes

    7 years ago

    KC? This would be a Gordon 2.0 contract.

    1
    Reply
    • jekporkins

      7 years ago

      Exactly! You’d think they learned when they re-signed Gordon. I don’t see many first basemen that are worthy of this type of cash in today’s market. In my opinion first base is the easiest position on the diamond to fill.

      The only reason I can see it is if they really consider him a franchise player. As a Giants fan, I get not wanting to lose that. I want to see Buster Posey retire having only played for the Giants. It’s not often players do that anymore. Is Hosmer considered that in KC?

      3
      Reply
      • lowtalker1

        7 years ago

        Let’s see you go play first base and then you tell me how easy it is
        Not adult drunk softball league, but legit independent or minor league games

        Reply
        • Brewers39

          7 years ago

          He didn’t say 1B was easy to play. He said it was an easy position to fill. Big slow power hitters who can’t play defense are very plentiful and are usually put at 1B, or DH. Defensive value at 1B has always been undervalued for that reason.

          3
          Reply
        • Gobbysteiner

          7 years ago

          Are you 5?

          Reply
        • Jack Taddy

          7 years ago

          1st base’s mom over here

          1
          Reply
  18. njbirdsfan

    7 years ago

    You can get crappy haircuts anywhere, so I’m taking the nicer weather in San Diego.

    11
    Reply
    • sufferforsnakes

      7 years ago

      Hehehehe.

      Reply
  19. georgebell 2

    7 years ago

    Gross

    1
    Reply
  20. srmocardsfan

    7 years ago

    For that kind of money the Cardinals will stay out of it I hope. Have to ask yourself this question. If he is worth that kind of money why is it only two teams that are in rebuild mode interested in him? I see this as a bad contract and most all Gms don’t want anything to do with it.

    2
    Reply
  21. bucknerforhall

    7 years ago

    also we have to consider this is from Bob Nightengale

    not the best track record.

    5
    Reply
    • Jimcarlo Slaton

      7 years ago

      John Heyman is another one agents use to spread bogus offers for their clients.

      2
      Reply
  22. alexgordonbeckham

    7 years ago

    As a White Sox fan, please sign with the Royals.

    3
    Reply
  23. jagonza

    7 years ago

    Agree with the majority, never pay big money for a first baseman at that age. I just don’t get it, people learn from Chris Davis deal. And any pitcher with more than a four year deal is crazy too

    1
    Reply
  24. BaseballRebel

    7 years ago

    This is just sad

    1
    Reply
  25. Jakeboykin

    7 years ago

    Ill take hosmer at 21 million and what he brings over whatever fringe mlb guy the royals will get with the 30 something pick they will get for him. Of course i also think his defensive metrics are way off from his actual abilities. In fact until they start trying to measure ability to scoop throws then the metrics will be off. Its similar to catching metrics before pitch framing.

    2
    Reply
    • bjsguess

      7 years ago

      It’s not $21MM. It’s closer to $140MM. And I would absolutely take the over on a first round pick producing more surplus value than Hosmer over the life of his contract. The most likely outcome is that Hosmer produces negative value while the pick either produces marginal value or no value.

      As for scoops – great article over at Fangraphs that covers this exact topic. Long and short – elite scoopers save maybe a few runs a year vs average scoopers. Hosmer’s problem isn’t actually fielding or scooping. He’s fine in both areas. It’s his range. His negative value in range more than off-sets his positive defensive attributes. Hosmer is fine when it comes to routine plays but adds virtually nothing on tough defensive plays. I’d recommend heading over to Fangraphs to check out his Inside Edge and Advanced Fielding sections.

      1
      Reply
      • outinleftfield

        7 years ago

        The difference between “elite scoopers” and the bottom was 27 outs in 2017, 34 vs 7. How many runs is that? I don’t know.
        Since the scoop stat only includes balls in the dirt, how many outs are there in corralling offline throws and turning them into outs by tagging the runner. One year when he was an Oriole, Will Clark tagged out 11 players on plays that took him off the bag.

        5
        Reply
        • Geebs

          7 years ago

          Dave Cameron at FG just covered the scoop thing in a chat and even the best “scoopers” add like 0.3 of a win, while that isn’t nothing its not something either.

          1
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          I can’t find that chat. Do you have a link?

          Getting 27 outs more is only 0.3 wins better? Somehow that doesn’t seem right.

          Since we are talking about Hosmer, let’s look at his 2017 scoops. He had 21 of his 34 total scoops with men in scoring position. They don’t list how many outs there were or if there were one or two baserunners, so let’s go with the lower run expectancy for a single. That means each of those plays Hosmer made an out on had a 1.10 run expectancy if the out is not made. so Hosmer saved 23.1 runs on those plays. That does not include runs saved on any subsequent at bats with men on base.

          23.1 runs is a tick under 6 wins or a 5 win difference from the 1B with the fewest scoops and 3 wins better than the average number of scoops. That also does not include the value of the other 13 scoops.

          That seems much more reasonable than 0.3.
          Add the extra outs from balls that were not in the dirt and things like starting DP and PO overall and you have to say that 1B is much more than the 100-150 balls in play they handle per season.

          But those things are not included in UZR or dWAR. We need a better

          5
          Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        7 years ago

        And then consider that Hosmer likely wants an opt out so that if he is producing surplus value on the contract he can just re-enter free agency, and without being eligible for a QO this time.

        2
        Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          Which would be a plus for whoever signs him. It is not the first few 2-3 seasons (In this case, Hosmer’s age 28-30 seasons) that are a problem on 6+ year deals for position players, it the last 3-4. So if he performs at a high enough level that he can opt out, the team that signs him won’t be on the hook for those seasons when he is in decline.

          5
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          It has been explained to you multiple times that an opt out is NEVER a positive for the team. If Hosmer is playing well he just re-enters free agency. If he sucks he just sticks to the existing contract. An opt out eliminates all of the upside in the contract while eliminating none of the downside.
          Anyway, if the Padres we’re to sign Hosmer, I imagine they would want him for the long-haul, not to have him leave right when they are on the cusp of contending.

          5
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          7 years ago

          An opt out does not eliminate the positive value a team received before the opt out, and like ARods contract, if the team lets him leave, (NYY chose to pay him more) they save the decline on the back end.

          5
          Reply
        • Stevil

          7 years ago

          Of course it does. You pay a player anticipating production. If he produces, he opts out, and asks for more. If he doesn’t, the team gets stuck with a bad contract with nothing likely but declining years.

          Teams don’t give players options with the hope that they’ll opt out.

          1
          Reply
        • Stevil

          7 years ago

          WestCoast, I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said about the negatives with a player opt-out, but I would actually be surprised if Hosmer got one. At age 28, the opt out would likely come between ages 31-33. Probably not a great time to hit free agency and ask for a better AAV on a multi-year deal as a player with limited power.

          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          In today’s climate, it is common for free agents as young as Hosmer to want an opt out in their contract because they figure they got one more good contract in them. I agree tho that the Padres likely won’t give him one because if they are gonna sign him, they want him for the long haul, not to just have him leave when the team is on the cusp of contending.

          2
          Reply
        • Geebs

          7 years ago

          ok ok I’m no expert but would you believe experts?

          “The logic of opt-out clauses for the club escapes me,” Manfred told FOX Sports on Thursday night. “You make an eight-year agreement with a player. He plays well, and he opts out after three. You either pay the player again or you lose him.

          “Conversely, if the player performs poorly, he doesn’t opt out and gets the benefit of the eight-year agreement. That doesn’t strike me as a very good deal. Personally, I don’t see the logic of it. But clubs do what they do.” – MLB Commissioner Manfred

          fangraphs.com/blogs/on-opt-outs-and-the-value-to-a…
          fangraphs.com/blogs/on-opt-outs-and-risk-mitigatio…
          fangraphs.com/blogs/the-fascinating-jason-heyward-…

          These are the opinions of professionals

          Thinking an opt out is good is just using post hoc ergo propter hoc to create a narrative based on non existent data from the future, Players aren’t in the business of “taking on for the team” financially, they wont opt out of a contract they cant at least duplicate. That would be like . quitting your 45,000 a year job to work part time at burger king,

          1
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          There is no upside on the contract after age 30.

          5
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          I don’t care what Cameron has to say when simple business logic tells a different story.

          The value of a player is in what he is paid vs what he produces.

          There is no value in a contract after age 30, or maybe age 31. Players begin to decline in their age 30 season. They decline in a predictable manner and there are few position players that ever produce even 2 WAR in their age 35 and older seasons. Only 3 did last year and all 3 of those were less than 1/2 of their peaks seasons. In 2 of the 3 cases, it was 1/3 of their peak at age 27-29. All 3 peaked in that age range. At age 37, the age Stanton will be in 2027, no one had a positive WAR last season.

          If the opt-out is at 30-31 or older, then say buh-bye and take the best that player had to offer and the surplus value the 1st few years of these long-term deals offer a team. You win in that case even if you get nothing in return for him when he walks, because you are not paying the majority of the money in their contract for declining production.

          If you keep him for the declining years, then you are not getting surplus value on those years. You lose.

          Whether he walks or you trade him just before the opt-out, you win when you don’t have to pay for years where you get less value than you pay out.

          5
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          “There is something about these opt-outs that I don’t think has been mentioned often enough. Yes, they’re obviously a tremendous financial benefit for the player. But they’re also pretty, pretty, pretty good for the wealthy teams. If you’re the Cubs or the Red Sox, you’re absolutely thrilled if Jason Heyward and David Price play terrifically in their first three seasons, because that means you’re getting your money’s worth and you’re probably winning baseball games.

          But everybody knows the risky thing about these contracts is the so-called out years. So would smart organizations like the Cubs and Red Sox be terribly disappointed if Heyward and Price let someone else pay the freight down the road? Leaving the clubs with a sudden windfall of sorts, and the attendant flexibility?

          I think not.” – Rob Neyer

          foxsports.com/mlb/story/rob-manfred-opt-out-clause…

          5
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          Its the opinion of ONE person and he is just another writer. His opinion doesn’t stack up.

          4
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          If there’s no value on the contract after age 30 then there is absolutely no chance that Stanton opts out

          2
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          No, you don’t win in that situation because you lose a player who you have signed for below market value. Or if you really don’t wanna be on the hook for the back end of his contract, he would at least become a valuable trade chip if he didn’t have the opt out and continued to produce.

          2
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          No, they aren’t good for the wealthy teams. They would still be getting their money’s worth and winning games if those players played well and didn’t have opt-outs. And they would still be able to get out from under the out years and have another someone else pay the freight down the road by TRADING THE PLAYER! If the player is playing well enough that he would want to opt out, they would be able to trade him without paying any of his contract and possibly get back a nice prospect in return. Don’t troll and say “They won’t be able to trade those guys without eating salary” because if that is the case the player isn’t going to opt out in the first place.

          2
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          Your opinion doesn’t stack up and others see it too. I know that now that I have disagreed with you, you are probably going to bust out all of your alt accounts and downvote me into oblivion. Get a life.

          2
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          Ryan, You are the one that needs to get a life. I have one account, this one. If you are getting downvoted, its because people don’t like you and don’t agree with you. Maybe it is because you chose to insult people and call them names so often. Maybe it is because you are almost always wrong. Either way, you need to look in the mirror.

          5
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          Bruh, you can give it a rest. It is well known on here that you have multiple accounts and use them to downvote people you don’t agree with. It’s a dead giveaway when it’s the exact same number on every one of my comments. I’d have so much more respect for you if you just came out and admitted it.
          You’re one to talk saying I am almost always wrong. You’ve been wrong multiple times this year but I generally just let it go unless you insist on being a tool. You have been given countless opportunities on this thread to put down the shovel but instead, you keep digging. It’s abundantly clear that you aren’t interested in considering viewpoints that don’t match your own. Everyone on this thread save for you and stymeedone realizes that the opt out is only player friendly so I’d suggest you put down the shovel now.

          2
          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          Rob Neyer, Ken Rosenthal over at the Athletic, Tom Verducci, and Peter Gammons and a number of other well respected writers don’t agree with you about this point either. Apparently, Dave Cameron does so you will take his opinion. That’s ok. Believe what you want.

          When it comes to claiming I have duplicate accounts, that is the pot calling the kettle black. Whenever you are on, I can be guaranteed that everything I say will have the exact same number of downvotes within minutes. When you are not on, sometimes there are more upvotes, sometimes there are more downvotes, but its never exactly the same.

          2
          Reply
        • websoulsurfer

          7 years ago

          Cameron is an expert. Some others agree with him, some don’t like Rob Neyer and Ken Rosenthal, but the reason he gets paid to do this is that people generally respect his opinion.

          2
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          There’s really no agreeing or disagreeing. I have already explained why an opt out is either objectively bad or has no effect in pretty much all possible situations. The only scenario in which the team benefits is if the player thinks he is worth more than whatever is left on the contract but all 30 GM’s disagree. If that happens, he needs to fire his agent.
          Your comments have varying numbers of up and down votes. It’s too obvious what you are doing when literally every comment I post gets three downvotes along with a response from you at the same time. You’re too much of a coward to even admit that you downvote people’s comments at all.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          You explained nothing. You gave an opinion with no data to back it up.

          In his article, Gammons quotes GM’s that don’t agree with you either.

          I have one account, this one. It is enough.

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          I respect his opinion, but it is just that, another opinion. It is far from fact. Too many people including the two you mentioned don’t agree with him or in this case Ryan/abgb123.

          2
          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          Oh and back to Heyward and Price. There is essentially no chance that either one of them opts out, further proving my point that if a player is playing at a level where his team would want him to opt out, he’s not going to. The same will be true with Stanton. His contract is for 10 years if the Yankees would prefer 3 years and 3 years if the Yankees would prefer 10 years.

          Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          I did explain it. Your failure to understand it is your problem, not mine. Why would the Yankees want to lose a MVP candidate who they have signed for below market value? Even if they want to get off the hook for the back end of his contract he would at least figure to draw some trade interest.
          Considering the fact that Walt Jocketty, Dan Duquette and Michael Hill exist, you’ll have to forgive me for not caring what some GM’s think.
          No you don’t.

          Reply
  26. homer 2

    7 years ago

    Do owner’s and GM’s never learn? We the amateurs see the problem for whomever signs him before it even happens and the professionals don’t? In one column list all the seven year contracts that worked for the team, and in the other all the seven year contracts that did not. No need to even put in players names for this visual. Hosmer is not the missing link to put your team over. the top. Run Forrest Run!

    2
    Reply
  27. Willy Mays

    7 years ago

    Why would anyone offer Hosmer that kind of money? He’s not worth that next year forget about the end of the contract

    5
    Reply
  28. thefenwayfaithful 2

    7 years ago

    If the Royals actually have $147 million sitting on the table for Hosmer he needs to hurry up and sign that deal before they come to their senses.

    8
    Reply
  29. BadlyBent

    7 years ago

    No one is offering Hosmer 7/140. I like Hosmer and he’s a solid player, but we watched his market shrink and that’s just not happening. Sources “close to Hosmer” are close to Hosmer for a reason.

    6
    Reply
    • dbec72

      7 years ago

      More like the Padres or Brewers offered 5yr 100mil and Boras is trying to get them to bid higher ie give us your best offer. I am guessing he goes for 5yr 105 as neither team will buy into the lies.

      4
      Reply
      • lowtalker1

        7 years ago

        Why would the brewers offer that? They have zero need

        Reply
  30. dbec72

    7 years ago

    How much did Boras pay Bob for this story?

    3
    Reply
  31. Kane U.

    7 years ago

    Haha!! Cardinals please stay away!!

    Reply
  32. mike156

    7 years ago

    Not to make an obvious point, but if these aren’t just rumors floated to drive the price up, it tells you a lot about the economic state of baseball. Two small/midmarket teams offering $20M+ per year long term to a player who isn’t a first-rank star even at his best.

    1
    Reply
  33. Joe Kerr

    7 years ago

    I don’t know about you guys, but when I think of the best 1st basemen in the league, Hosmer is nowhere near the top. Paying him that kind of money will be a regretful move especially for a team that isn’t ready to win right away. They will be ready to win when he is going into the down years of the contract. Makes no sense to me for either the Padres or the Royals to sign him.

    3
    Reply
  34. jaytai7918

    7 years ago

    It’s just Boras BS, I’d give him 5 years and 100 max, even though that’s still crazy.

    2
    Reply
  35. oct27

    7 years ago

    People outside of KC have to realize the value Hosmer has to the Royals organization and to the city. Whether that’s sentimental or not – it does have significant value. How to quantify that – who knows.
    And I know this discussion about Hosmers defense will be never ending. But as someone who rarely misses a Royals inning – the metrics just aren’t correct. He is an above average defender at worst.

    3
    Reply
    • Joe Kerr

      7 years ago

      Well that’s too bad for Royals fans if true. They have limited payroll space and if they use that much of it on 1 player, you won’t be seeing a winning team in your near future.

      Reply
      • oct27

        7 years ago

        This isn’t 2012. The Royals have had payrolls over $130 mil the past 2 seasons.
        That doesn’t necessarily mean the contract is a good idea, but with an owner that has started paying for winning baseball, and a new TV deal coming up – a $20 mil per year player does not necessarily hamstring the Royals.

        1
        Reply
    • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

      7 years ago

      Trying to appeal to the casual fan does not lead to making smart baseball moves.

      4
      Reply
  36. dkramer

    7 years ago

    He’s going back to the Royals. Book it.

    Reply
  37. jwarden15

    7 years ago

    That’s a ton of money considering Royals are entering a rebuild. They should save that money for short term contracts as they wait for some of their prospects to debut in the majors. I know their farm system isn’t good but they have some players who are close to making their debut in the majors. Give them experience, use the extra draft picks wisely, and maybe you’ll end up drafting a future star in the making

    Reply
    • william-2

      7 years ago

      The Royals cyclical tear down is not as constant as the Athletics, but you can still count on it like the sun rising in the East, only it lasts far longer. They do not have the money to keep their stars, or pro longed success. The only long contracts they can afford to make, are for prospect extensions (like the Indians 90’s, and Royals 70’s used to give) at discount levels, and even that is gambling for them. They have to offer them to the right people, at right levels, or they cripple themselves financially from building the pieces to compliment those contracts. It is the sad truth, and something a Yankee fan would never admit exists for other teams. In the world of roughly 27 other teams, making mistakes all over your roster means doom, keeping your stars is actually crippling to building a winning team, success is measured in clumps of 2 to 3 years before rebuilds that drop you out of contention, buying a minor league system full of new prospects after draining it in trades for all stars is impossible, and spending an extra 20 to 30 million at the trade deadline is common place.

      Reply
      • billneftleberg

        7 years ago

        There doesn’t need to be 27 other teams is something royals fans dont get either. Why water down the sport.

        16 teams is more than enough. I’m tired of people acting like they’re entitled to something when they are not

        I’m in Florida. And do we deserve 2 teams? NO

        2
        Reply
        • william-2

          7 years ago

          Couldn’t have said it better myself. I can honestly say that nearly 1/3 of the players in MLB are actually AAA talent level, and probably 5 or more of the teams aren’t even viable as real competitors on a yearly basis, let alone on a decade basis. So many flaws in the current model, outside of the money they did it for. This can be said about all the major sports at this point. A guy in the industry speaking candidly told me some basic truths in his view. 1) Any team in MLB can be bad enough, long enough, to become good enough to compete eventually only to upset the cart for those rationally talking about the overextension of teams in the league. 2) None of those teams involved in the overextension debate have the revenue to keep those teams together if they ever do become good enough to contend. 3) Most of the lower level tier teams have rosters filled with players that should not be on a MLB roster, and those that draft/internationally sign, develop and reap the rewards for their work are simply incubation teams for big market teams to fix their holes. 4) the league will expand further despite the obvious problems.

          Reply
  38. william-2

    7 years ago

    Behold free agency off season. A place and time where fantasy becomes reality. Multiple 7 year deals, sounds like teams are lining up. They are not. The bidding at 7 years is most likely the Padres, and perhaps, maybe, possibly, not likely, but only the Royals. Rumors that the Royals are out bidding the Padres is probably, most likely, complete crap. I would venture to guess there are probably another 4 or 5 teams total coming in at about 5 years, but no longer then that. Interesting how when the Red Sox were involved you only heard about the Padres, Sox, and Cardinals in the Wings. Now that the best viable option for a bidding war is gone, all of a sudden MULTIPLE offers are on the table, at what the best bidder was unwilling to do. As usual, this is probably one team bidding against itself at the asking price, and half a dozen teams seeing if the asking price will drop to something in line with reasonable for a player like Hosmer.

    Reply
  39. rocketfish19

    7 years ago

    Nobody is that stupid. This is typical Boros. Lying through his teeth.

    Reply
  40. therealryan

    7 years ago

    Does anybody read the article before commenting? Many here saying these 7 year contracts are all crap made up by Boras, but in the article it says that Nightengale confirmed the legnth of the contracts with both teams. I agree this seems an outragous offer for a second or third tier 1B, but it seems at least the Royals and Padres have money burning a hole in their pockets.

    1
    Reply
    • rocky7

      7 years ago

      Well I read it again just like you said, the the reports are from Nightengale speaking with “sources close to Hosmer”. Should we trust these “sources” which may be his Mom and Dad for all we know. How about quotes directly from the teams involved?
      I would venture a guess, that the sources close to Hosmer would like nothing better than to artificially increase any offer he receives just to up the bidding on this guy who I agree is definitely over-valued.
      And, I’m wondering since when is USA Today a good source for sports rumors?

      4
      Reply
      • william-2

        7 years ago

        People are looking at this like the interests of Boras, and Hosmer are somehow separate. A bidding war requires bidders, and those bidders need to think that they are actually bidding against other bidders if you want what you are asking for. Hosmer’s (rep’s) people have every incentive to pitch the same malarkey that Boras is. Honestly, what are they going to say? “Only one team is close to the asking price, and we do not what to end up there.”.

        Reply
      • therealryan

        7 years ago

        Are you for real? The second paragraph under 8:25 am ends with “Notably, Nightengale says he was able to confirm the length of the proposed contract terms with both organizations.” This clearly states that Nightengale confirmed with the TEAMS that they have 7 year offers on the table. Again, that is the teams, not Hosmer’s camp or his friends or whoever else you have made up in your head while reading this. Sorry if I come across rough here, but I don’t know how else to show you what you haven’t been able to comprehend in at least two reads of the written story above.

        Reply
  41. SixFlagsMagicPadres

    7 years ago

    Please don’t do this Padres. Hopefully this is just Boras being Boras, but all that money for Hosmer is a very bad idea. They need to just let the rebuild play out because they’re going to regret giving out a contract like this.

    5
    Reply
    • Padres2019ha

      7 years ago

      So continue to have a $35 mil payroll for the next 4-6 years while all of our minor leaguers are on minimum salaries? Might as well have some expensive vets to help mold the team and have guaranteed solid players while still having a low payroll.

      Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        7 years ago

        No.

        2
        Reply
        • Padres2019ha

          7 years ago

          Starting to sound like your boy outinleftfield

          1
          Reply
      • SixFlagsMagicPadres

        7 years ago

        Of course, they will have to sign some free agents when they feel they can start legitimately contending. I’m just saying that signing Hosmer now is a bad idea. It would be better to wait until next year to sign a higher-caliber free agent than to give Hosmer all this money now and have it come back to bite them, especially given his inconsistency.

        2
        Reply
  42. bravesfan

    7 years ago

    I want to see him be a royal for life. That’s just where he seems to fit. If not, would love to see a power team take him, Ie not either of the two teams in the front to get him

    1
    Reply
  43. petefrompp

    7 years ago

    If any of this is remotely true, it does make the Giants extension on Brandon Belt seem like a bargain.

    Belt is better defensively, hits for more power, more average, and gets on base more and cost 5/72m

    so I’m a Giants fan and I don’t love Belt- I thinks its body language when he hits his rough spots- I like Hosmer- but I wouldn’t go more than 5/100

    2
    Reply
    • bjsguess

      7 years ago

      Huge difference between an extension on a FA contract. But you are correct, Brandon Belt is a better player than Hosmer. If anything, the Giants should be shopping him to the loser.

      Reply
  44. FBA17

    7 years ago

    Boras plays the media guys like crazy so they can leak supposed offers. I can’t stand him but good at what he does I guess.

    Reply
  45. outinleftfield

    7 years ago

    Nightengale must get a cut from Boras. The Cardinals say they have not made an offer. The Red Sox, Dodgers, and Yankees are out. The only teams that have confirmed they have made an offer are the Padres and the Royals and inside sources there have reported 5 and 6 year offers.

    6
    Reply
  46. billneftleberg

    7 years ago

    All teams just got 50m from the BAM tech sale. At least the Royals and Padres aren’t putting it in their pockets this time.

    Small market teams leech off the sport routinely. Its About Time They Invested In Their Product. Their Grubby Fans blame everyone else But themselves. When The Dont Support Them

    1
    Reply
    • Coast1

      7 years ago

      The BAM tech sale was a one time payout. Any team that increases their payroll significantly based on that is in for a rude awakening down the road.

      3
      Reply
      • jleve618

        7 years ago

        I’d probably say that teams could probably add 50 million in contracts they wouldn’t have normally added and still be ok.

        Reply
      • billy neftleberg

        7 years ago

        thats the point though small market teams routinely put that money in their pocket

        why do they deserve a team

        their go to excuse is blame the Yankees, Dodgers and Red Sox

        the Yankees, Dodgers and Red Sox are not the problem…small market teams are the problem…..

        they dilute the talent and make the game worse

        Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          What part of the BAMtech sale is a one time deal did you not understand? It has never happened before and it will never happen again.

          6
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          7 years ago

          Enjoy your three team league.

          3
          Reply
  47. Boneslab

    7 years ago

    Royals fan,

    Can’t wait for Hosmer to hit a whopping 110 home runs and .279 over the duration of this…along with our incredible pitching staff, I see us missing the playoffs for however many years.

    Reply
    • brucewayne

      7 years ago

      Huh?

      Reply
      • Gobbysteiner

        7 years ago

        What

        Reply
    • amendoza1539

      7 years ago

      Que?

      Reply
      • Gobbysteiner

        7 years ago

        なに!??

        Reply
      • Gobbysteiner

        7 years ago

        なに?

        Reply
  48. hiflew

    7 years ago

    This just has all the earmarks of the Joe Mauer deal. Bring back the beloved fan favorite on a big contract and then lose a lot for several years.

    1
    Reply
  49. thinkgreen

    7 years ago

    No way he has 7 year offers on the table.

    1
    Reply
  50. TribeGuy 2

    7 years ago

    Feels like a Mauer type deal for the Royals. Will handcuff them for years.

    1
    Reply
  51. rememberthecoop

    7 years ago

    Offered 7 but seeking 8 or 9? That’s called greed, my friends. Look, I’m all for get what you can, but with that kind of wealth, just go where you want to play and don’t worry about the years and dollars. I mean, once you’re at 7/140 or whatever you really can’t go wrong.

    2
    Reply
    • kbarr888

      7 years ago

      You’re exactly right but you won’t get 10% of the commenters to agree with it here. That’s because they really don’t understand how much money $140 million is.

      People that make $100,000/yr at their job make less than $5 million over the course of their entire career.
      People that make $300,000/yr ( most of us don’t know 10 people who make that much)…. make about $13 million in their entire life.

      $140 million is such an absurd amount of money….. that it surely guarantees that his grandchildren will never have to work. Let that sink in for a few minutes……. and then tell me that he should hold out for more money.

      3
      Reply
      • brucewayne

        7 years ago

        Half of that $140 million will be gone for federal taxes! Cuz it puts him in a 50% tax bracket! Plus state taxes

        Reply
        • brucewayne

          7 years ago

          and all the other stuff taken out

          Reply
        • brucewayne

          7 years ago

          and then the agents 15% . Plus the more you make, the more you spend! LoL

          Reply
        • outinleftfield

          7 years ago

          There is no 50% tax bracket. The top used to be 39.6%. Starting next year it will be lower.

          6
          Reply
  52. 66TheNumberOfTheBest

    7 years ago

    The contract will be an untradeable albatross to whichever organization hands him the pen before the ink is even dry.

    Reply
  53. dvmwitt

    7 years ago

    If I was Preller and wanted Hosmer and Boras, etc are saying that there are multiple offers of 9 figures, then I would offer less and see where it goes. The Padres shouldn’t go after him, but also shouldn’t be bidding against themselves. Call his bluff. You don’t get him, you save that 2nd round pick and move on.

    3
    Reply
  54. tuna411

    7 years ago

    This:

    1:25pm: San Diego’s offer is at seven years but has not reached $140MM

    7 years, $110,000,000 sounds about right

    5
    Reply
  55. lord vincent

    7 years ago

    So if he has received multiple offers then it not the teams that have slowed down free agency it’s the players greed.

    Reply
  56. Luke Strong

    7 years ago

    The real question here is why would KC or SD be so interested in giving out a huge contract like this when they are seemingly not at the point of being legitimate contenders? It seems extremely short-sighted to me. It’s like they decided at some point that they have to commit to a rebuilding process, but way too far before it could reach fruition, they randomly decided to throw a grenade into their plans. Hosmer has been a relatively decent player, but he’s not a superstar you rebuild around and make the highest paid player in franchise history, particularly when you don’t have the supporting cast in place around him. It’s easy to expect this deal to turn out poorly, the majority of long-term $100M+ FA deals have blown up on teams and it’s not long after that they are looking to deal the guy away for salary relief and wind up paying the other team to take the contract. I have little doubt that will eventually be the case if KC or SD signs him.

    1
    Reply
    • dvmwitt

      7 years ago

      The Padres are mid-way into their rebuild. The logic is start a winning culture. Get some vets in to help with the wave of talent coming up each year. Over the next 3-4 year, there will be a few rookies coming up each season and it can only help to have a seasoned veteran that has been to the World Series on the roster. What it also shows to me is that they are losing faith in Will Meyers as someone for the younger guys to look up to. If they can get a Hosmer, that would help, even though I’m not really excited about the commitment in money and years.

      Reply
      • lowtalker1

        7 years ago

        They haven’t lost faith in him. AJs recent interview praised him.

        6
        Reply
        • dvmwitt

          7 years ago

          You think AJ would publicly say anything else?

          Reply
      • Padres2019ha

        7 years ago

        Finally someone gets it. You can’t just field a bunch of unproven rooks. $20 mil per isn’t a huge amount considering setup men are getting $9. He’s a young veteran player w intangibles. If he’s declining over the last 3 years, you trade him if need be and eat $20-$30 mil. Sign Yelich, trade Hand and sign a Keuchel next year to anchor the young team. We can replace half of the prospects from Yelich w Hand haul.
        Payroll will be under $100 mil and expiring salary dumps will be gone after the next. Myers can only improve from last year as long as he stays healthy, and Hosmer will take pressure off Wil.

        Reply
  57. lowtalker1

    7 years ago

    Under 140. Everyone knew it. I bet royals is far less than 147 as well but comparable to the padres. Add 1 mil per year more than likely. Either way. 110 should be max at 7

    3
    Reply
  58. #Fantasygeekland

    7 years ago

    If I signed him for 7 years, I probably wouldn’t even give him 100M but I’d give close to that.

    Reply
  59. imindless

    7 years ago

    That much for wally joyner 2.0? someone will regret this deal

    5
    Reply
  60. idkmybffjill

    7 years ago

    can someone please explain to me why all the hate on hosmer?

    1: hes a clubhouse leader by all reports
    2: hes still young at 28 and plays a position that is easier on the body, so he should age better than most
    3: plays 150 games per year and has never had a major injury
    4: has knocked in 90+ runs 3 years in a row even though he hits the ball on the ground a lot (because he can hit with RISP AKA clutch performer)
    5: and is a perennial Gold Glover (why do we keep saying his defense is terrible?)
    6: is an exciting player than fans pay to come see

    it can be interpreted or valued differently from person to person, but none of the above is straight wrong. 7/$130-140 range seems right at market value to me

    4
    Reply
    • outinleftfield

      7 years ago

      Hosmer plays the position that is easiest to fill. There is a glut of 1B on the market.

      Bonds won a Gold Glove in a year he led MLB in errors. Palmiero won a Gold Glove in a year he played 28 games at 1B. Gold Gloves are not a measure of defense.

      What does RBI have to do with individual performance? Nothing. Now if you said that Hosmer knocked in 16.9% of baserunners and that he was below the league average of 17.4% in that regard then I would say that the stat you were referring to mattered. RBI’s mean nothing taken out of that context.

      Other than the top 5 or so players in the league like Kershaw, Scherzer, Trout, and Stanton, no one pays to see individual players. They pay to see winning teams. Hosmer’s 2 WAR doesn’t place him in that stratosphere.

      11
      Reply
      • stymeedone

        7 years ago

        Obviously, you have forgotten what it is to be a fan. Fans go to see their favorite player, whether its Scherzer, or Ryan Zimmerman. When you live in Milwaukee, or Cincinnati, or KC, or San Diego, or Tampa, or Minnesota, or Toronto, like most paying fans, you find a favorite on your hometown team and root for them, even if your team cant win every year (because realistically, they cant). That player may not be a top 5 player, nor does it need to be. Front runners only root for the team when its winning. Fans pay for tickets in the down years. Fans are the target audience of the teams. They sustain the teams until the window opens. If appeasing real fans makes the front runners have to wait longer… oh well.

        1
        Reply
        • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

          7 years ago

          I go to see the team play, regardless of who’s on it.

          3
          Reply
    • Padres2019ha

      7 years ago

      Precisely. All these keyboard GM’s sure seem to know more than a real GM. Regardless if you respect Preller, The Cards are well ran and they are even in on him and obviously in the ballpark of the other offers around they would have bowed out a while ago.

      Reply
    • Yankeepatriot

      7 years ago

      Fans do not pay to see Hosmer play. If they did they would have filled seats prior to 2015

      3
      Reply
    • kbarr888

      7 years ago

      idkmybffjill…….
      Here’s some stats for you….. they will shed a different light on Hosmer.

      Hosmer vs Wil Myers
      If you take their career numbers and extrapolate Myers out to the same number of AB’s……He has way more power and speed…..while Hosmer hits for a higher average. Very similar players. Myers just signed a 6/$83 Million contract last January. He’s been a 28/28 and a 30/20 player the last 2 years.
      Hosmer has been a 25/5 and a 25/6 player.
      They are the same defensively.
      Why is Hosmer worth twice as much money?????????

      Now look up Todd Frazier. Compare the stats for 2017 for each of them and you’ll find them to be very similar also.
      Frazier again, has more power. Hosmer a higher average. Many stats the same.
      Frazier went 40/15 in 2016 and 27/4 in ’17. Still better than Hosmer
      Frazier is 3 years older than Hosmer, but is only looking for 3/$36-39….1/4 of what Hosmer wants.

      Just doesn’t add up. Hosmer is not worth 7/$160 Million, when you compare him to what else is available. Morrison, Duda, Lind, Frazier.

      2
      Reply
      • Yankeepatriot

        7 years ago

        Take away hosmers batting average and players like fraizer make him look like a real rip off for the money he is getting. If Morrison repeats last year or close to it hosmers deal will look even worse. Despite having a career year hosmers ops was under 900

        3
        Reply
        • kbarr888

          7 years ago

          EXACTLY^^^^^^^^^

          2
          Reply
    • justin-turner overdrive

      7 years ago

      1: hes a clubhouse leader by all reports

      if only we all could get $140 million dollars by being nice people

      2: hes still young at 28 and plays a position that is easier on the body, so he should age better than most

      lmao this is like a reverse defense of how you should never overpay for a 1B

      3: plays 150 games per year and has never had a major injury

      True. And this does have value.

      4: has knocked in 90+ runs 3 years in a row even though he hits the ball on the ground a lot (because he can hit with RISP AKA clutch performer)

      Sorry dude its 2017 we don’t hit the ball on the ground anymore. Hosmer’s power is meh. Hosmer himself is meh. If Carlos Santana gets 3/60, Hosmer deserves 3/50.

      5: and is a perennial Gold Glover (why do we keep saying his defense is terrible?)

      Fangraphs has him as the worst defensive 1B over the last 5 years. Even worse than Ryan Howard, which no one thought possible. Here’s a link
      fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=1b&stats=fld&#…

      6: is an exciting player than fans pay to come see

      opinion not fact, i find him extremely boring to watch and his swing isnt that pretty…but this is opinion, i dont present as fact, like you do

      2
      Reply
  61. Paramatic

    7 years ago

    Let’s just be done with it and rename the off-season the “Scott Boras Season”

    1
    Reply
  62. bkwalker510

    7 years ago

    Most overrated player in baseball

    2
    Reply
    • Yankeepatriot

      7 years ago

      Debatable

      1
      Reply
      • Jack Taddy

        7 years ago

        Solid argument. I think I’ll go with this guy!

        Reply
    • eduardoaraisa98

      7 years ago

      Bryce Harper and Yasiel Puig are more overrated

      Reply
  63. hiflew

    7 years ago

    I don’t know why anyone would be really worried about the opinion of people here. Especially baseball execs. 95% of the people around here said that KC would be a dumpster fire for the next ten years when they traded Wil Myers and Jake Odorizzi for James Shields. 2 years later, they were in the World Series and the next year they won it. That worked out pretty well for them, didn’t it? Hosmer could become a Chris Davis albatross OR he could become the 2018 AL (or NL) MVP. or anything in between.

    I think it is time that people here stop speaking of this stuff like it is dogma and just admit it is all a guessing game. Even though it is extremely educated guessing, it is still just guessing.

    3
    Reply
    • go_jays_go

      7 years ago

      I don’t disagree with your thesis. However, I see the 2015 Royals as an outlier rather than the norm. As a team they accrued 37.1 f-WAR, which translates to 84.8 wins. They definitely benefited from playing in a weak division, and got hot at the right time. Good for them. But I don’t see it as a model of consistency.

      4
      Reply
      • Yankeepatriot

        7 years ago

        Their bullpen carried them in both World Series Years. How else can you make it that far with those mediocre starting staffs they had ? The central those years wasn’t great either

        2
        Reply
        • hiflew

          7 years ago

          Their bullpen, which included Wade Davis. Acquired in the trade that would doom them for years. Besides, history does not care how they did it or how weak their division was in both years. History only cares about results and the results say the Royals won the World Series in 2015.

          Reply
        • chesteraarthur

          7 years ago

          History absolutely cares about how it happened. “Get lucky” isn’t really a great plan to build around…

          2
          Reply
        • Jack Taddy

          7 years ago

          Tell that to Daft Punk!

          Reply
      • hiflew

        7 years ago

        The AL Central is almost always going to be the weakest division in baseball due to there being an abundance of small market teams. Cleveland, Detroit, KC, and Minnesota are all small market. Even the White Sox could be argued as a small market team. The Royals in 2015 didn’t just benefit from getting “hot at the right time,” they were easily among the best teams in baseball that season. Even if they didn’t win games the way the numbers like.

        The point is that that division is almost always winnable (or at least 2nd place) for anyone, so it really could be a model of consistency for the AL Central. It wouldn’t work in the AL East or the NL West or really any other division just because the competition is much stiffer, but it could work for KC.

        Besides, if 37.1 WAR is equivalent to only 84 wins, then how did they win 95? It’s not necessarily an exception, it means that the stat is not meant to be as literal as people have taken it.

        1
        Reply
  64. AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

    7 years ago

    I’m gonna need to know who that source is before I believe a word of what they are saying.

    6
    Reply
  65. go_jays_go

    7 years ago

    Why not just skip the Hosmer sweepstakes and sign either one of Logan Morrison, Lucas Duda, Adam Lind? Use the saved money elsewhere.

    6
    Reply
    • agentx

      7 years ago

      I agree. However, there’s a good chance that Morrison and possibly Duda and Lind as well are waiting to sign until after Hosmer to see how much the latter’s hype may bolster their value.

      Reply
  66. Yankeepatriot

    7 years ago

    Bad teams shouldn’t offer huge contracts to non elite talent. Whoever signs his wr will regret this deal. As for Hosmer he might as well should go to the pads as they have better potential in the near future than the royals right now

    3
    Reply
  67. ba2929

    7 years ago

    Might want to update this with the Sam Mellinger article from the KC Star. He says the Royals haven’t offered Hosmer that dea.

    1
    Reply
  68. GarryHarris

    7 years ago

    Tree Fungus! Fake News.

    Reply
  69. AgeeHarrelsonJones

    7 years ago

    Seven year contracts to 28 year olds who played 162 games and had a career best BA and WAR are not likely to bring the kind of value the owners and fans are clamoring for. I would love to see an analysis of all year 5+ yr contracts signed by 28 year olds. What proportion of these guys even averaged more than 110 games played after the age 31 season? .I’d also love to see data on walk-year stats compared to year-after walk-year stats.. Optimism is the engine of capitalism and no one is more optimistic than Scott Boras. What a predatory marketing genius.

    4
    Reply
  70. justin-turner overdrive

    7 years ago

    I can’t get over it’s KC and SD who are going big on a guy who had a career year in a walk year and hasn’t even really been elite ever. Donaldson is a year away.

    2
    Reply
  71. Stevil

    7 years ago

    I don’t get why either club would want Hosmer. If KC couldn’t contend last season with Cain, Moose, and Hosmer, why bring back just one at an enormous rate and know that you’re not going to contend or get a compensation pick to aid a thin farm?

    San Diego isn’t going to contend, either, and Myers couldn’t stay healthy in the outfield. Why commit big dollars to a position you already have covered? Even if you were bent on moving Myers to RF, there’s still a ton of cheaper options available and many more valuable free agents available next offseason in areas of greater need that the same dough could be better spent on.

    4
    Reply
    • stymeedone

      7 years ago

      Hosmer would sell more tickets next year than that comp pick will.

      1
      Reply
      • justin-turner overdrive

        7 years ago

        No one goes to baseball games to see specific players, they go to see the team. Approx zero people are going to be sitting around in KC going “Hmm, should I go to a Royals game? Is Hosmer still on the team? No? Then, no, not interested anymore.”

        5
        Reply
  72. savageRandy

    7 years ago

    Eric Hosmer a 20 mil per year player? Makes ARod’s contract look like a discount.

    1
    Reply
    • Yankeepatriot

      7 years ago

      Only 3 million less than the Yankees are paying Stanton

      Reply
  73. twentyfivemanroster

    7 years ago

    a good read about Hosmer’s underrated defense. m.mlb.com/news/article/246027506/metrics-dont-show…

    Reply
    • justin-turner overdrive

      7 years ago

      Incredible quote

      “Could his range to his glove side be a little better? Sure. But overall, he’s as good as it gets.”

      LMAO

      or “He’s my fwiend and I will never say a bad word about him!”

      3
      Reply
      • twentyfivemanroster

        7 years ago

        so, you scan over what others outside the org. say, or does that not fit your narrative?

        Reply
  74. Yankeepatriot

    7 years ago

    The more of these contracts get handed out the more of a bargain Stanton looks like for the Yankees

    Reply
  75. AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

    7 years ago

    Here is what the Padres need to do: Tell Hosmer “This is the highest we are willing to go. If you don’t accept it within 24 hours we will pull our offer and you can sign with someone else.”

    4
    Reply
    • Padres2019ha

      7 years ago

      Agreed;)

      Reply
    • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

      7 years ago

      If he’s smart he walks away from them. The interest is not mutual.

      Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        7 years ago

        Let him.

        3
        Reply
  76. jd396

    7 years ago

    A mystery team has offered Hosmer 10 years.

    Reply
    • Solaris601

      7 years ago

      Exactly, and it never will be revealed who exactly that team was. Classic Boras. Used car salesman who somehow weaseled his way into Major League Baseball as an agent.

      Reply
  77. tigerdoc616

    7 years ago

    7 years? Hosmer is a good player, but not worth 7 years. But hey, if he can get it, good for him.

    3
    Reply
  78. ThatBallwasBryzzoed

    7 years ago

    Why would he go to San Diego? Outside of wil Myers they are trash.

    1
    Reply
    • jdgoat

      7 years ago

      In a couple of years they’ll be good

      5
      Reply
      • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

        7 years ago

        Hosmer is in his prime now why go to a team with only one guy ahead of him ..and no one to hit him in. And zero pitching. He might as well re-sign with KC. Both KC and SD are in rebuild mode.

        1
        Reply
        • eduardoaraisa98

          7 years ago

          KC is litteraly barely building up their team. They lost the majority of their talent to FA, they don’t have much talent up in the majors, and their farm system sucks. Meanwhile the Padres already have at least some major league ready players and a stacked farm system. So I don’t see why he would sign with KC. He has a better chance on at least having a winning season with the Padres than with the Royals.

          5
          Reply
    • youcannnnnputitontheboard

      7 years ago

      ThatBall….

      Are you aware of how uninformed you are?

      They have a top 3 system that has already graduated Manuel Margot, Hunter Renfroe, Luis Perdomo, Dinelson Lamet and Austin Hedges. Plus, they have Brad Hand on a completely team friendly deal that will benefit them in a trade or to hold onto.

      They’re likely to finish in last place this year, but they are progressing nicely.

      3
      Reply
  79. justin-turner overdrive

    7 years ago

    “9:43am: Sam Mellinger of the Kansas City Star reports that the Royals have not made an offer worth $147MM over seven years to Hosmer, though the remain interested in re-signing him.”

    You mean “this rumor got out and they saw how much everyone was laughing at them for going after the worst possible guy they could.”

    3
    Reply
    • Geebs

      7 years ago

      Ya cause baseball teams normally change their direction and weigh 147 mil decisions because a bunch of bone heads are crying.

      1
      Reply
  80. GOP Lizards

    7 years ago

    Who does he think he is… Albert Puljos?

    2
    Reply
    • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

      7 years ago

      He’s better than pujols and 14 years younger.

      1
      Reply
      • eduardoaraisa98

        7 years ago

        I think he meant Albert Pujols in his prime…

        3
        Reply
        • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

          7 years ago

          Pujols is 42 bro

          Reply
        • eduardoaraisa98

          7 years ago

          You do realize I said when he was on his prime, right? And he’s 38, not 42. Pujols started his prime the moment he joined the majors (21) until the age of 32 when he started to show lack of contact and power compared to when he was younger. Hosmer is 28 years young, played for seven seasons, with two 25 HR seasons and two seasons with .300 BA. At that age, Pujols had 32+ HR hit in every single season and .312 BA or higher. So it’s not even fair you’re comparing Pujols and Hosmer because Pujols is no doubter better than Hosmer

          Reply
        • ThatBallwasBryzzoed

          7 years ago

          You do realize that pujols is older than he claims to be right. He signed with Anaheim at 35. He’s been there 7 years of his 10 year overpay deal.

          Reply
        • eduardoaraisa98

          7 years ago

          I’m sorry, I can’t take you seriously. Albert Pujols was 32 when he signed with the Angels and no, he is not older than he claims to be. You don’t even have evidence to back up your clam, you’re just making stuff up. You can litteraly go online and search up Albert Pujols age and MOST will tell you he is 37. I said most because I’m sure there’s someone out there that will say otherwise just to troll people like you. What’s next? Is Ichiro actually 50 years old now?

          Reply
  81. Lefty_Orioles_Fan

    7 years ago

    noting that Hosmer is younger than the bulk of free agents that have received contracts of seven or more years in length.

    Scott Boras is a known ‘extortionist’ and is looking to shakedown some silly MLB owner
    I hope they stand up to him and face the peril and tell him no!!!
    Then Hosmer would have to sign with the London Silly Nannies!

    1
    Reply
  82. Padres2019ha

    7 years ago

    Boras and Nightengake should be fined and suspended for theirnlack of integrity and manipulation for high jacking the market. Slime balls

    2
    Reply
    • Joe Kerr

      7 years ago

      I disagree, as much as I HATE Boras, he is just doing his job. Nightengale on the other hand is NEVER right, even his confirmations of offers are now being confirmed as incorrect. The guy cant tell which way is up yet for some reason people still listen to him. I don’t get it.

      3
      Reply
      • youcannnnnputitontheboard

        7 years ago

        Yeah, Joe Kerr, he’s pretty much useless. If I see his name attached to something, I know it’s highly unlikely to be correct.

        2
        Reply
  83. BaseballRebel

    7 years ago

    I hear the Cards are offering 8 years 160, good for them LOL

    Reply
  84. Rightout

    7 years ago

    will somebody just sign a contract…with some team ….i think the cards sign hosmer,,,,its a safe bet he doesnt want to sign withe the padres……. all teams should just collude and tell boros to kiss off…….borass is a pain in the ass…….

    Reply
    • eduardoaraisa98

      7 years ago

      If he didn’t want to sign with the Padres then they would’ve been out of the race for a long time now…

      3
      Reply
      • AndThisGameBelongsToMySanDiegoPadres

        7 years ago

        That’s not true. Talks between the Marlins and the Giants and Cardinals regarding Giancarlo Stanton dragged on for WEEKS even though he was never going to approve a trade to either of them.

        2
        Reply
        • eduardoaraisa98

          7 years ago

          You’re comparing trade talks with FA. In FA you have are free to sign with whoever you want for whatever amount of money you want. When is comes to trades you have more limited control. You can’t choose who you can get traded to, just like Stantoon wanted to get traded to LA. Everyone knew Giancarlo wanted to leave Miami the moment Jeter and Sherman purchased the Marlins because he wanted to win. His main goal was to leave to LA, but because the Dodgers weren’t that interested he didn’t have many options. He either stayed with the Marlins or moved to some other team that was willing to eat a majority of his salary and will give him a chance to win until he has the chance to out put his contract. The Giants had a chance because they were the closets he was gonna get to LA and because they were willing to eat a chunk of his salary and the Cardinals haven’t had a bad season since last year. In this case, we don’t know Hosmers motivations. If he wanted to be a Royal for the rest of his life he would’ve signed an extension, so it’s not loyalty. I’m sure it’s money and the lack of interest from other teams unless Boras lowers down the price so other teams can get in the race.

          3
          Reply
  85. Pageup

    7 years ago

    If he had 147 on the table he’d sign it. He has to know he;s not getting more than that. So basically, he has 7 with 5 guaranteed at 18 per.

    2
    Reply
  86. kennylcx

    7 years ago

    Sure he has Boras, what’s he holding out 8 years now!

    Reply
  87. vpolite

    7 years ago

    Why do people keep posting to this thread?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Recent

    Angels Acquire LaMonte Wade Jr.

    Blue Jays Notes: Scherzer, Varsho, Francis

    Pirates Reportedly Receiving Interest In Isiah Kiner-Falefa

    Angels Sign Ben Gamel To Minor League Deal

    Blue Jays Recall Spencer Turnbull For Season Debut

    Orioles Notes: Westburg, Mullins, O’Neill

    Tigers Notes: Vierling, Olson, Urquidy, Boyd

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Yankees Claim CJ Alexander

    Phillies Claim Ryan Cusick, Designate Kyle Tyler

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version