Headlines

  • Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death
  • Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List
  • Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros
  • Evan Longoria To Sign One-Day Contract, Retire As Member Of Rays
  • Diamondbacks To Promote Jordan Lawlar
  • Rockies Fire Bud Black
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Rangers Extend Jose Leclerc

By Jeff Todd | March 6, 2019 at 9:56am CDT

The Rangers have struck an extension with reliever Jose Leclerc, as first reported by Evan Grant of the Dallas Morning News. Leclerc, who is represented by Munger English Sports Management, receives a $14.75MM guarantee over a four-year term. The Rangers will have a pair of options valued at $6MM (2023) and $6.25MM (2024).

Leclerc, 25, was still one season away from reaching arbitration eligibility, so this contract will provide him with no shortage of additional financial security. The organization, in turn, will lock in cost savings and certainty for a pitcher whose prospective earnings could have risen substantially with an ongoing accumulation of saves.

The new contract covers the 2019 season along with Leclerc’s three prospective arbitration-eligible campaigns. He’ll receive a $2MM signing bonus, followed by $1MM, $2.25MM, $4MM and $4.75MM salaries. There’s a $750K buyout on the club option years, which cover Leclerc’s first two potential free-agent seasons (the hurler’s age-29 and 30 seasons).

This deal comes on the heels of a breakout 2018 campaign in which Leclerc took over the Rangers closer’s role and established himself as one of the game’s most exciting young relievers. He ultimately worked to a 1.56 ERA in 57 2/3 innings with 13.3 K/9 and 3.9 BB/9.

Leclerc’s offerings — a mid-nineties heater and splitter, primarily — have always been tough to square up. In his first two looks at the big leagues, though, Leclerc did not command them. He dished out a whopping 53 free passes in his first 60 2/3 MLB innings.

Last year, Leclerc nearly halved his walk rate (from nearly twenty percent to 11.2%) while retaining his elusiveness. MLB hitters struggled badly in all respects. Leclerc maintained an excellent 17.1% swinging-strike rate, surrendered only 3.7 hits per nine, and allowed only a single long ball on the year. He was a Statcast darling, placing among the league leaders in wOBA-against (.205), xwOBA-against (.210), exit velocity (83.7 mph), and hard-hit percentage (20.0%).

There aren’t many comparable extensions for early-career relief pitchers — in large part because teams rarely feel compelled to commit future money to such players. In fact, among contracts documented in MLBTR’s Extension Tracker, this is actually only the second-ever deal that expanded a team’s control rights over a relief pitcher with more than two years of MLB service but not enough to qualify for Super Two status. Way back in 2011, the White Sox inked a three-year deal with Sergio Santos that promised him $8.25MM and came with three option years. His option seasons were valued at $6MM, $8MM, and $8.75MM, so there was a bit more overall earning power in that pact.

A pair of deal with two exceptional southpaw hurlers are also worth noting as comps. As a Super Two reliever, Felipe Vazquez secured $22MM in promised money while giving the Pirates control over two additional campaigns at $10MM each. That contract covered a similar arb/free agent span as Leclerc’s, but Vazquez had already reached arbitration eligibility — meaning his downside was protected because he was set to receive a significant salary and had established a high starting point for his arb years.

Before that, back in 2014, Sean Doolittle and the Athletics agreed to a deal that looks like the closest comp to Leclerc’s. At the time, Doolittle was one season away from highly likely Super Two qualification. He was promised $10.5MM, which boosted up to $13.5MM when he ultimately did have enough service time to join the Super Two class. That agreement came with $6MM and $6.5MM options. Doolittle was much older than Leclerc, presented a notable health risk, and was a season further away from free agency, though he was also arguably a higher-floor pitcher from a performance standpoint. As with Leclerc’s contract, the Doolittle deal bought out all of the seasons that were already under the club’s control (five in the A’s case) and did so at a point when the player was still a full season removed from arbitration eligibility. In each case, the team’s willingness to pay up was surely due to a combination of two overriding factors: first, a fear of run-away arb salaries; second, the rights to a pair of highly affordable option years.

While Leclerc’s contract doesn’t seem to break new ground, then, it’s still a nice deal for a player who did not originally sign for big money and has only earned at the league minimum to this stage of his career. Few relievers achieve this kind of contract precisely because the earning outlook is so uncertain — especially before reaching arbitration. Leclerc could well turn into a 40-save monster who would substantially out-earn his new deal. But he’s just one injury or a creeping command problem away from missing out on save opportunities and entering arbitration with fairly meager statistical record to work with.

Grant (Twitter links), MLB.com’s T.R. Sullivan (in a tweet), Ken Rosenthal of The Athletic (Twitter link), and Jeff Wilson of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram (via Twitter) reported the contract terms.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

Share 0 Retweet 12 Send via email0

Newsstand Texas Rangers Transactions Jose Leclerc

Diamondbacks’ Silvino Bracho To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
Main
Minor MLB Transactions: 3/6/19
View Comments (47)
Post a Comment

47 Comments

  1. Jbigz12

    6 years ago

    Could be a bargain. As long as he throws strikes. Seemed to turn the corner on that last season. But if you look at his career(majors or minors) before that it was always a big problem. Hopefully he’s found that consistency but depending on the figures there’s a good amount of risk in this.

    3
    Reply
  2. cooper95

    6 years ago

    Great job, Texas. He is one of the best young pitchers on the team.

    1
    Reply
  3. acarneglia

    6 years ago

    Good job by Texas to lock in their closer of the future long term

    3
    Reply
    • Strike Four

      6 years ago

      Texas aren’t going to be competitive at any point of this contract. It’s to boost his trade value, which it will.

      3
      Reply
      • bigkempin

        6 years ago

        It can potentially be for 6 years. They definitely can be competitive unless they completely FUBAR their rebuild.

        3
        Reply
        • Strike Four

          6 years ago

          “Potentially” isn’t definitely. It is plainly obvious that this is a mirror of the Doolittle sign and then later trade.

          I like it for Texas don’t get me wrong, its a smart move, but there’s no way they are competing in the next 4 years UNLESS they make moves like this, locking in possibly-very valuable talent on not-large money deals for future trades for good prospects. So that comment of “lock in their closer of the future long term” is entirely wrong, they just made an asset even more valuable in a trade while they are in a non-contending window.

          Reply
        • GeauxRangers

          6 years ago

          Uhh I think it’s asinine to say there’s no way they’re going to be competing in 4 years. They’ve traded for a lot of young but close to mlb ready talent of late and they are going to have a ton of financial flexibility very soon. It could go either way but the potential for them to be a good team in the next 3-4 years is definitely there.

          Reply
  4. ty11

    6 years ago

    Good move

    1
    Reply
  5. Houston We Have A Solution

    6 years ago

    Increases his trade value significantly. Rebuilding clubs dont need elite pen arms. Could net Texas a huge prospect haul. Similar to what happened to brad hand.

    3
    Reply
    • brewcrew08

      6 years ago

      While I agree Leclerc is very solid I still think he needs to prove it for another season to start drawing comparisons to Hand trade value wise. Hand automatically starts with higher value since he’s a lefty. I do agree Leclerc could bring back a very solid rerun though.

      1
      Reply
      • AidanVega123

        6 years ago

        Yeah if I’m a team looking to acquire Leclerc, I’d be concerned about his past issues with issuing walks.

        Reply
  6. spinach

    6 years ago

    Should trade him this summer if he’s still good and they stink, would bring back a lot. Cubs or someone.

    Reply
    • ReverieDays

      6 years ago

      The Cubs have a plethora of solid bullpen arms already and not “a lot” to give back in a deal.

      Reply
  7. canocorn

    6 years ago

    Thought at first the name was Simon Legree.

    Reply
  8. Robertowannabe

    6 years ago

    Leclerc-Saw the name and the first thing that popped into my head was the old M*A*S*H episode about the wounded soldier from Luxembourg..His name was Leclerc as well ” I thought he had died…….He got better.” great episode.

    1
    Reply
    • zachgwest

      6 years ago

      MASH episode? How old are you?

      1
      Reply
      • Robertowannabe

        6 years ago

        Old enough to remember watching M*A*S*H original episodes! Was the show to watch in college!

        Reply
      • MWeller77

        6 years ago

        This is a terrible comment.

        1) Nothing wrong with being old 2) In the Internet age, we can watch all sorts of shows that were on years before we were born

        Reply
    • cpdpoet

      6 years ago

      Luxembourg thanks you for the mention…

      1
      Reply
    • bobtillman

      6 years ago

      Klinger: “This is the worst day of my life!”
      Potter: “Don’t be silly, son. You’re young yet. You’re going to have much worst days than this one”.
      Klinger: “Thank you, sir”.

      4
      Reply
      • Robertowannabe

        6 years ago

        LOL! another great line!

        Reply
  9. baseballhobo

    6 years ago

    Is he part Mexican and part French?

    Reply
    • Lefty Grove’s right hand

      6 years ago

      Dominican Republic is next to Haiti, a former French colony.

      Reply
  10. Strike Four

    6 years ago

    Now trade him for an absolute haul.

    Reply
  11. DarkSide830

    6 years ago

    not a bad deal for a reliever in today’s market. (player-wise)

    Reply
  12. oaklandfan22

    6 years ago

    Solid deal from the Rangers perspective, this guy can pitch.

    Reply
  13. Yankeepatriot

    6 years ago

    His trade value just went up

    Reply
  14. bobtillman

    6 years ago

    Comment that this increases his trade value exponentially is spot on. Rangers don’t figure to need an impact closer for a while, but with that VERY team-friendly deal, they’ll get a ton (assuming continued performance).

    Red Sox might even give Swihart……

    1
    Reply
    • oz10

      6 years ago

      But as the Rangers do get better and these young pitchers have chances at a win you want them to get it so that it helps build confidence. I know wins are a meaningless stat for a pitcher but it does instill confidence in young starters to get them.

      1
      Reply
  15. HubcapDiamondStarHalo

    6 years ago

    I don’t generally buy into collusion or conspiracy theories…

    That said, I think (at least until the CBA is renegotiated) that you’re going to see a LOT more of these contracts. The Yankees locked up Hicks for $70 million; $10 mil per year for that kind of talent (and during what are generally his most productive years) is a steal, especially by today’s numbers. The Rangers just locked up one of the more promising young relievers in the league, and if the options kick in, they get six seasons for a total of $27 million. Where does the collusion come in? I honestly think owners looked at what free agents were getting on the open market and combined it with advanced stat studies and came up with a plan to literally scare the young guys into signing undervalued contracts. Hicks and Leclerc most likely cost themselves a LOT of cash in the long run. I understand their motivation – outside of the microscope of baseball, they both should now be set and be able to comfortably care for their families for life. l get that. The owners, though, are pretty comfortable, and as is the norm, it sure seems like they’ve found a way to keep (justifiably) rising player salaries in check, at least to a degree.

    1
    Reply
    • Jbigz12

      6 years ago

      Hicks was only due 6 this year so he got 64 MM for the next 6 essentially. He had no more arb seasons. He would’ve been entering FA at 30. Hicks really only has one full season of major league ABS in his back pocket and really scuffled his first 3 years. He may have been able to get himself more if he produced again this year but I’m assuming a guy who hasn’t made a ton in his career like Hicks realized the upside was probably 10-15 Million and the downside was a lot less. Not a bad deal for him at all I don’t believe

      1
      Reply
      • Jbigz12

        6 years ago

        To add to that. We’ve seen the decline curve of CF’s once they get older and the wheels go. IE cutch, Jones. I can’t imagine any team would’ve valued him over the Lo Cain 5/80 in FA. he got himself a guarantee in between Cain and pollock which is pretty much where I’d value Hicks. It’s a good deal for the Yankees as well because at that price you can make him a fourth OFER down the line if it happens and you’re not really hurting.

        3
        Reply
        • Melchez

          6 years ago

          Hick’s health is the main question. He’s had a ton of talent but seems to always end up on the dl.

          Reply
    • stymeedone

      6 years ago

      @hubcap
      Not a lot of FA’s at age below 30 as things have been, which is why Bryce and Manny created such a stir. This contract covers his year of control, plus 2 options that may or may not have value. Other than cost certainty, this doesnt provide all that much extra to the team. He could easily revert to his career norms in the walk dept, and those $6MM options won’t hold a lot of value. LeClerc’s future holds promise but is far from a sure thing..

      Reply
      • Jbigz12

        6 years ago

        This extension is a lot more than cost certainty. It’s a potential bargain. The guaranteed money is less than they’re paying Smyly and Lynn for this season alone. If he reverts to not throwing strikes again then they’re out 14 mil spread over 4 seasons. He would’ve made more than that as a closer in arbitration if he would’ve produced anywhere close to the level he pitched at. This why this deal makes sense to the team every single time. This guy has made a little over a million bucks in his entire career so he’s obviously thrilled to see more come his way.

        3
        Reply
  16. preauto

    6 years ago

    I’m thinking the Kimbrel camp is not pleased.

    Reply
    • Strike Four

      6 years ago

      Why? They are in totally different phases of their careers. Leclerc is never going to get Kimbrel money right now. Maybe in 4-6 years, but if you think this contract means Kimbrel is not going to get a massive deal, you really don’t understand how the FA system works.

      Reply
      • preauto

        6 years ago

        Yeah I guess you are probably correct. I just looked at it as 2 similar pitchers at(at least last year)….one getting 27 mil for 6 years and one asking for 100 mil for 6 years. I do realize they aren’t maybe comparable in that way..

        Reply
  17. The Ranger Fan

    6 years ago

    If I were an owner I too would make this deal to younger players to lock them up, I remember back in the seventies players stayed with teams for years unless they were traded, the owners are not colluding,they are just getting smarter. I for one am in favor of owners making some money,But I also believe the players should make money as well, but not the 300 million contracts. If the pay a fortune to the A-AA-AAA players what’s to say they won’t make their fortune and retire before reaching the majors. Let them put in the work to earns promotions to AAA and the majors so they can earn a little more,same as I did in the MARINES. Baseball needs caps on positions and minimum and maximum in the future to stay competitive. The End.

    Reply
    • averagejoe15

      6 years ago

      No one is saying minor leaguers should be paid a fortune, just a living wage. As for players making $300M, why shouldn’t they? Where should MLB’s increasing revenue be going instead? The owners? The owners make plenty. The players should get their fair share as well whether its 50 or 55% of revenue or what have you. The money will still be distributed as teams see fit an players will still make $300M.

      The put in your time to earn it doesn’t work well when you are in your physical prime but forced to take wages below your actual productivity. Earning your stripes is for professions and industries where experience and knowledge gained have more value than physical skills. That world is not professional sports.

      Even if baseball had a cap players would still make $300M or more because the cap would be tied to revenue. If you mean player contracts should have caps they would still be tied to revenue in one way or another.

      2
      Reply
  18. LosAngelesAngelesAngelesAngelsOfLosAngeles

    6 years ago

    Great move by the Rangers.

    Reply
  19. bleacherbum

    6 years ago

    That is the Brad Hand/Raisel Iglesias deal

    just waaaaaay better.

    Leclerc is lights out and is now controlled for very cheap. Value just sky-rocketed. Aka he will be dealt at the deadline for a haul now that he is controlled at that rate.

    1
    Reply
  20. Swinging Friars

    6 years ago

    Finally some good news for my keeper team

    Reply
  21. Coal tender

    6 years ago

    No doubt, the only bright spot (LeClerc) on the Ranger ballclub. A very parsimonious front office has suppressed the ability acquiring other “bright spots.” Seems present owners are only interested in appealing to potential new buyers to bear some of the operational costs in running this franchise.

    Reply
    • oz10

      6 years ago

      Use the word parsimonious in a sentence to sound smart but then the structure of the sentence is so far off that you don’t.

      And the Rangers have never shied away from spending. It just isn’t prudent right now.

      Reply
  22. holecamels35

    6 years ago

    24 hits in 50 innings seems hardly sustainable. If his control goes wild and a bit of luck goes the other way, he may not look so good.

    Still, cheap enough deal to not matter. Especially if he closes, arb prices would be much higher.

    Reply
  23. soxski

    6 years ago

    Use Kimbrel to refute the players union being upset. 2017 Kimbrel was amazing in Boston but 16 and 18 he was a joke. 3R he did ok but 1R or tie games were an adventure. The playoffs were a good sample of his work all yr. Up 5-1 CK enters vs NYY and Sox win 5-4 w bases loaded after he gave up 3 Runs. This happened in Seattle and in LA. Plus we watched him get smoked and walk the world all yr. He was not worth the pieces we gave SDP for Kinbrel. Then he asks for 5/100. No one was going to come close and no one did. If he stayed around 5/55-60 he us signed quickly. Then their is Harper who turns down 10/300 as soon as FA begins not teams fault that spenders were waiting for Haeper and MN to sign. No baseball team should sign a player over 5 years let alone 10. History shows they dont work out for teams. NYY had Arod for 12 yrs 1 WSC. He was a hike which NYY ended up dushing 330 million over the duration while Texas paid a chunk for him to play 4 NY. Dont you think that Detrot Oriokes Angel’s would live 2 fund takers for Miggy Davis or Puljois Miggy has 6 yrs left of had baseball. I cant wait until Stantin hits 10yr make w 3 yrs remaining. Most expensive bench players ever. Pablo Hankey Fielder Hiward ARod all were paid to go home by the end of their deals. I’m sure ARod pictured fans crying when he retired w his numbered retired along w Bonds Jeter Selig friends family at Yankee stadium to cheers tears and gifts. Instead he was booed out if baseball. Bad bad bad. The rule should have 5 yr Max deals w incentives to bump pay up to 30 or 40 mm per yr. I vet owners wont mond paying 17
    Million per yr and giving another 33mm if the player hits 40HR 135RBI or 200 kings 2.50 era 20 wins they will pay gladly. They fight salary bc they dont want to pay 40mm for a 214 avg 11HR 54RBI

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death

    Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List

    Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros

    Evan Longoria To Sign One-Day Contract, Retire As Member Of Rays

    Diamondbacks To Promote Jordan Lawlar

    Rockies Fire Bud Black

    Cubs Promote Cade Horton

    Rafael Devers Unwilling To Play First Base

    Pirates Fire Manager Derek Shelton

    Mariners Claim Leody Taveras

    Rangers Hire Bret Boone As Hitting Coach

    A.J. Minter To Undergo Season-Ending Lat Surgery

    Blue Jays Sign Spencer Turnbull

    Blue Jays Sign José Ureña

    Ross Stripling Retires

    Rangers Place Leody Taveras On Outright Waivers

    Triston Casas Likely To Miss Entire 2025 Season Due To Knee Surgery

    Orioles Recall Coby Mayo

    Dodgers Recall Hyeseong Kim

    Triston Casas Suffers “Significant Knee Injury”

    Recent

    Major League Baseball Rules That Permanent Ineligibility Ends At Death

    Phillies Sign Seth Beer To Minor League Deal

    Guardians Place Ben Lively On Injured List With Flexor Strain

    Dodgers Place Roki Sasaki On Injured List

    Jordan Luplow Signs With Atlantic League’s High Point Rockers

    Dodgers To Activate Clayton Kershaw On Saturday

    Yankees Sign Anthony DeSclafani To Minor League Deal

    Rangers Place Corey Seager On Injured List

    Cubs Promote Moises Ballesteros

    Jake Bloss To Undergo UCL Surgery

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version