Headlines

  • Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment
  • Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery
  • Braves Select Craig Kimbrel
  • Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox
  • White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel
  • Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!
  • Previous
  • Next
Register
Login
  • Hoops Rumors
  • Pro Football Rumors
  • Pro Hockey Rumors

MLB Trade Rumors

Remove Ads
  • Home
  • Teams
    • AL East
      • Baltimore Orioles
      • Boston Red Sox
      • New York Yankees
      • Tampa Bay Rays
      • Toronto Blue Jays
    • AL Central
      • Chicago White Sox
      • Cleveland Guardians
      • Detroit Tigers
      • Kansas City Royals
      • Minnesota Twins
    • AL West
      • Houston Astros
      • Los Angeles Angels
      • Oakland Athletics
      • Seattle Mariners
      • Texas Rangers
    • NL East
      • Atlanta Braves
      • Miami Marlins
      • New York Mets
      • Philadelphia Phillies
      • Washington Nationals
    • NL Central
      • Chicago Cubs
      • Cincinnati Reds
      • Milwaukee Brewers
      • Pittsburgh Pirates
      • St. Louis Cardinals
    • NL West
      • Arizona Diamondbacks
      • Colorado Rockies
      • Los Angeles Dodgers
      • San Diego Padres
      • San Francisco Giants
  • About
    • MLB Trade Rumors
    • Tim Dierkes
    • Writing team
    • Advertise
    • Archives
  • Contact
  • Tools
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Projected Arbitration Salaries For 2025
    • Free Agent Contest Leaderboard
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Agency Database
  • NBA/NFL/NHL
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors
  • App
  • Chats
Go To Pro Hockey Rumors
Go To Hoops Rumors

Padres Acquire Yu Darvish, Victor Caratini

By Connor Byrne | December 29, 2020 at 10:07pm CDT

DEC. 29, 10:07pm: Both teams have announced the trade. The Cubs will pay $3MM of Darvish’s remaining money, per Jordan Bastian of MLB.com and Heyman. Darvish has $62MM left on his contract – not the previously reported $59MM – because of the incentives he reached for finishing second in 2020 NL Cy Young voting, Bastian notes.

DEC. 28: The Cubs and Padres have agreed to a deal that will send right-hander Yu Darvish and catcher Victor Caratini from Chicago to San Diego, Mark Feinsand of MLB.com reports. The Cubs will receive righty Zach Davies, shortstops Reginald Preciado and Yeison Santana, and outfielders Owen Caissie and Ismael Mena in return. The trade is done pending medical records, and the sides could finalize it Tuesday, per Jon Heyman of MLB Network.  Chicago will pick up “a minor portion” of Darvish’s remaining money, Bob Nightengale of USA Today adds.

This deal does not come as a surprise, as the two sides had been in deep discussions about Darvish throughout the day. It’s the latest bold strike for the Padres, who are coming off their first playoff season since 2006 and clearly plan to vie for their first-ever World Series title next year. Even before landing Darvish, they made a huge addition to their rotation Sunday by agreeing to pick up left-hander Blake Snell from the Rays. They also agreed to sign Korean infielder Ha-Seong Kim on Monday, making for an epic 24-hour period of dealmaking for GM A.J. Preller.

The Cubs, meanwhile, are losing perhaps their best starter in Darvish – a 2020 National League Cy Young finalist – as well as a quality catcher in Caratini. Although the Cubs are just a couple months removed from their fifth playoff berth in six years, ownership entered the offseason unlikely to spend after a pandemic-shortened campaign. Indeed, the Cubs previously saved money by saying goodbye to Kyle Schwarber and Albert Almora at the non-tender deadline, while pricey third baseman/outfielder Kris Bryant has been the subject of trade speculation. It’s unclear whether the Padres will take on all of Darvish’s remaining contract, but if they do, that’ll be $59MM on their books over the next three years. Caratini’s much more affordable, as he will earn a projected $1.2MM to $1.6MM in 2021. Caratini isn’t on track for free agency until after 2023.

In heading to San Diego, Darvish will reunite with Preller, who was part of the Rangers’ front office when they signed Darvish out of Japan before the 2012 season. Darvish, now 34, has since enjoyed a terrific career divided among the Rangers, Dodgers and Cubs, and last season was likely his best yet. He ended up with 76 innings of 2.01 ERA/2.23 FIP ball, posted 11.01 K/9 against 1.66 BB/9, and averaged a personal-high 95.5 mph on his fastball. He’ll now slot in near the top of a rotation that lost Mike Clevinger to Tommy John surgery but will still feature Snell, Dinelson Lamet and Chris Paddack as locks for rotation jobs (barring other aggressive moves). The Padres also boast multiple high-end pitching prospects, including MacKenzie Gore.

Caratini, 27, was Darvish’s personal catcher in Chicago, but he was a reserve behind No. 1 backstop Willson Contreras. Caratini debuted with the Cubs in 2017 and has since offered passable offense relative to his position, having batted .250/.327/.372 in 677 plate appearances. Caratini was also a well-regarded defender in Chicago, including when he ranked in Statcast’s 98th percentile in the pitch-framing department last season. He’ll join Austin Nola and Luis Campusano as catchers on the Padres’ 40-man roster.

For the Cubs, this deal represents their first blockbuster trade under new president of baseball operations Jed Hoyer, their former GM who earned a promotion after Theo Epstein stepped down in November. Losing Darvish and Caratini may not go over well for their fan base, but the Cubs are banking on Davies helping replace Darvish in 2021 and the young talent they received emerging as cornerstones.

Davies was somewhat quietly a top-tier starter in 2020, his only year as a Padre, as he recorded 69 1/3 frames of 2.73 ERA/3.88 FIP ball with 8.18 K/9 and 2.47 BB/9. He should look good alongside Kyle Hendricks as the Cubs’ one-two in 2021, though the 27-year-old Davies isn’t controllable beyond then. He’ll earn a projected $6.3MM to $10.6MM via arbitration next season.

The rest of the Cubs’ return doesn’t consist of any elite farmhands, but Kyle Glaser of Baseball America notes that BA was planning to rank Preciado (No. 15), Mena (17), Santana (18) and Caissie (20) among the Padres’ 20 best prospects in its upcoming Prospect Handbook.

Just 17 years old, BA rated Preciado 23rd in the Padres’ farm system midway through last season, writing that the 6-foot-4 switch hitter’s “frame provides hope he can grow into 20-plus home run power as he matures physically.”

Mena, 18, signed an expensive $2.2MM bonus with the Padres out of the Dominican Republic during the 2019-20 international signing period. BA lauded Mena’s speed, range and potential 15- to 20-home run power earlier this year.

The 20-year-old Santana put up impressive production in rookie ball from 2018-19, when he combined for a .306/.418/.425 line in 365 plate appearances. The Canadian-born Caissie, 18, was a second-round pick (No. 45) of the Padres last summer. BA wrote before the draft that Caissie possesses “exciting upside,” though there are “some significant swing-and-miss concerns” in his game.

All things considered, this looks like a trade between two NL playoff teams going in different directions. The Padres appear to be all in on playing for a championship in 2021. It’s hard to say the same for the Cubs, who seem to be a club in retooling mode.

Share 0 Retweet 31 Send via email0

Chicago Cubs Newsstand San Diego Padres Transactions Victor Caratini Yu Darvish Zach Davies

Rays GM Erik Neander Discusses Blake Snell Trade
Main
Phillies Acquire Jose Alvarado In Three-Team Trade With Rays, Dodgers
View Comments (772)
Post a Comment

772 Comments

  1. jawinks

    4 years ago

    Salary dump. Cubs have thrown in the towel like the rest of the NL Central

    24
    Reply
    • chitown311

      4 years ago

      Towel Throwin’ Tom Ricketts! Holy “S” did Jed get FLEECED on this one! Maybe Theo would have fared a little better had he not jumped ship from this disaster!

      17
      Reply
      • ncaachampillini

        4 years ago

        Oh god you’re still around?

        7
        Reply
        • Idioms for Idiots

          4 years ago

          @ncaachampillini

          LOL Illini champs? Of what? Women’s Volleyball? Bowling?

          They have never won a championship in any major collegiate sport. They rarely ever win the Big 10 division in any sport (maybe once every decade or so).

          2
          Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 years ago

        Cubs did great. Top 20 padre prospects are top 10 for some teams. The cut a huge chunk of salary. They could take that money and sign other pitchers this year or later. Davies is a good arm for right now.

        I believe Cubs are going for it one more year. They would love to trade bryant rizzo baez, they just don’t have enough value for the Cubs to move them. Unless the padres decide they want them.

        2
        Reply
        • ABCD

          4 years ago

          Those prospects the Cubs got won’t be in their top 10 this winter. Maybe they’ll improve in the future (they are all at least 3-4 years away), but right now I’m not liking this trade. So much for “threading the needle”.

          And geez, it gets worse, they’re even picking up some of Yu’s salary.

          11
          Reply
        • rondon

          4 years ago

          If the Padres aren’t taking on all of Darvish’s salary, then I don’t like this trade either.

          3
          Reply
        • ABCD

          4 years ago

          And they threw in Caratini, too.

          5
          Reply
        • Rangers29

          4 years ago

          Are you new here @YourDreamGM?

          1
          Reply
        • to4

          4 years ago

          They also gave Caratini up as well. Who’s going to be their C once Contreras is gone?

          2
          Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          Amaya

          1
          Reply
        • David Herrick

          4 years ago

          No Morejon. No Weathers. No Lange. They didn’t get any starting pitching prospects, which is easily the weakest part of their system. I don’t think there’s any guarantee Marques, Azolay, or Franklin become starting pitchers in the Majors (I hope they all are).

          When reading that neither Abrams, Hassell, or Campusano were going to the Cubs, I figured they’d at least get Morejon and Weathers. This trade did not address their organizational weaknesses, and for a team supposedly competing for the NL Central, this is a suspicious trade. Getting Weathers and Morejon would constitute a “retool” for 2021-22, filling out the rotation with cheap, cost-controlled pitchers with upside potential. But this return tells me it’s going for a “heavy rebuild.”

          I like the return the Pirates got better for Josh Bell, getting Will Crowe and Eddy Yean, who were probably the prospects the Nationals were offering for Bryant. Those two are at least young pitching prospects with upside.

          Hopefully the Cubs’ pitching lab gets going with some starting pitching results!!!!

          4
          Reply
        • Joey Schmoey 2

          4 years ago

          A
          M
          A
          Y
          A

          Is a 22yr old stud!!!!! Up this year starting in 2022

          1
          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 years ago

          No. Just been haven’t commented much until these last few days of trades. And just added a avatar tonight.

          Reply
        • cubs2016champs

          4 years ago

          All 4 of our best players? I can see Bryant getting traded, But Rizzo? Mr. Consistent? Javy? after 1 off year?

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @cubs2016champs they are all free agents in a year. Would you rather get something for them now or lose them for nothing?

          2
          Reply
        • TomL

          4 years ago

          Justify “huge chunk of salary”….For me and you as employer and employee astronomical. For a 3rd largest market team to pay $20 Million for a Cy Young candidate and a generational player is dirt cheap for this front office.

          We get in return when we have the best young one in the game and they were supposedly high on Ed Howard. Horrible move. Can’t wait to hear what Kap has to say on this one.

          1
          Reply
        • sportingdissent

          4 years ago

          Baez isn’t the best shortstop in Chicago, let alone the game.

          8
          Reply
        • iml12

          4 years ago

          Cubs need to make some tough decisions and lock down 1 or 2 of these guys. At this point I could see a scenario where Bryant might even accept a qualifying offer or at least think hard about it. I am very interested to see what they do to address the outfield. The cubs now have to be in the bottom half of the league in payroll. If they can sign Brantley and a few pitchers to 1-2 year deals they could be competitive. As of right now they have 2 outfielders and 2 starting pitchers that they can count on for 150+ innings. The major league ready pitching in the minors is non existent. Marquez might be a late season call up and a big pitching piece for 2022

          Reply
        • teufelshunde4

          4 years ago

          You dont trade your top SP, IF you are going for it… Esp after losing another SP to FA.

          1
          Reply
        • Alex Bregman

          4 years ago

          Trading the guy who finished second in the Cy Young is never great

          Reply
        • Mrivers

          4 years ago

          Alzolay looked very good in his last few appearances. What stuff.

          Reply
        • Hammmbone

          4 years ago

          TomL, who is the generational player in this deal? Darvish? Cy Young candidate I’ll accept, generational player, NO SHOT!!!!!!

          Reply
      • ChiSoxCity

        4 years ago

        lmao

        2
        Reply
      • paddyo furnichuh

        4 years ago

        It’s a step in their rebuild as they waited too long to retool.

        Cubs gets Dabies plus SD’s #11,#13, #15, and #16 (per MLB prospect ratings)

        It is amusijg when we try to grade a trade within a week of the deal when prospects are involved.

        One team is getting immediate value, one is cutting payroll and attempting to get value that plays out a few years from now.

        4
        Reply
      • adc6r

        4 years ago

        @Chitown
        I don’t know about Fleeced, abd who’s to say it’s not golden?

        The point of my question is that these prospects are young enough that you will not be able to evaluate this trade. three of the four prospects are either at the rookie ball or A level and are 20 years old or so which means they have physical growth ahead of them that wil vastly change their prospect value. In 3 or four years when these player mature they will provide cheap controllable production for their team. Who much remains to be seen.

        Reply
      • Goose

        4 years ago

        Maybe Theo jumped because he knew his orders were to dump salary no matter what.

        4
        Reply
        • nbresnak

          4 years ago

          And There It Is!
          Exactly why he left.

          1
          Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      4 years ago

      Obviously. A few goofs thought the Cubs would get a haul for some reason, but if they are reloading they should just be glad he’s gone.

      9
      Reply
      • Tatsumaki

        4 years ago

        Davies is a huge get and arguably the same as darvish. This is a lateral move with padres taking on additional salary in the process.

        2
        Reply
        • nutznboltz

          4 years ago

          Being a Padre fan,I can assure you that Davies is not the same as Darvish. Davies got exposed against the Dodgers in the playoffs. Any team that lays off his pitches outside the strike zone and gets ahead in the count, hammers him He loves to give up the long ball. His fastball averages 88-89 and absolutely
          Can not be effective pitching behind in the count.

          3
          Reply
        • Hammmbone

          4 years ago

          Jmac2020, you must be living in an alternate reality because Davies isn’t as good as Darvish, it’s not even close. Darvish (2.7WAR), a power pitcher, versus Davies (1.7WAR on a better team) a soft-tosser. Davies is the same as Hendricks and Mills. The Cubs’ top 3 pitchers are Hendricks, Davies, and Mills. The average fastball velocity for those three is like 89 MPH. They couldn’t break a pane of glass.

          Reply
    • Aaron Sapoznik

      4 years ago

      This trade by itself is hardly an indicator that the “Cubs have thrown in the towel”. They traded their 34-year old ace and a backup catcher for a 27-year old mid-rotation starter and 4 solid prospects. The Cubs retained their starting catcher Willson Contreras and his two years of arbitration eligibility and still have all their other star quality veterans with a single season of control on the roster as well. If they follow this deal with trades of Contreras, Kris Bryant, Javier Baez and Anthony Rizzo that changes the narrative. At this point in time the trade would qualify as a retool and not the beginning of another rebuild.

      20
      Reply
      • InPolesWeTrust

        4 years ago

        Well said.

        1
        Reply
      • John Kappel

        4 years ago

        I actually would argue the opposite for the reasons you laid out. If the Cubs traded; Rizzo, Bryant, Baez, and Contreras. I think that would be more of a retool. All those players have 2 years or less of team control, will likely cost lots of money, and the Cubs have thus far shown an inability to develop pitching. Trading even the first 3 I mentioned for say 2 players each that were between double A and the majors would be the retool. They could fall back this year, be better in 2022 (in another shortened season) and be right back into a contention window by 2023. They now have less depth at a position that is the hardest in your body, not to mention more innings to eat over the next 3 years. To me, this signals that between now and the end of the contracts of Heyward, Hendricks, Bote, and Happ, (2024) they might not be much better than .500. Which for that team, with that payroll ability, in this market here, is absolutely embarrassing.

        3
        Reply
        • Aaron Sapoznik

          4 years ago

          We still don’t fully know the cash exchange, if any, between the teams as we post our comments. If the Padres incur the full brunt of the Darvish contract the Cubs could potentially use some of those savings for free agent acquisitions this offseason, some in subsequent years or even utilize them in an extensions to help keep Bryant, Baez or Rizzo beyond the 2021 season.

          1
          Reply
        • Very Barry

          4 years ago

          What purpose does keeping Bryant, Baez or Rizzo do? If you are going to rebuild …. then go all the way.

          1
          Reply
        • cards04

          4 years ago

          I don’t get it. Last years Bryant, Baez, and Rizzo didn’t get the job done. They are great players but they need more than 3 guys. If they spend the majority of money on the 3 then that will take away from the money they will be able to spend on starters and bullpen along with other position player needs. I say keep 2, I would prefer if I was a Cub fan Bryant and Baez to help save some money to be spent on other needs in the coming years.

          1
          Reply
        • John Kappel

          4 years ago

          That is also true. And after listening to Effectively Wild this morning, it sounds like these prospects are much better than most people in this thread think. However, they are still 3 years away.

          Reply
        • Hammmbone

          4 years ago

          However, they are still PROSPECTS!!!! None of which is rated in the top 100 prospects in MLB, top 10 prospects in the Padres farm system, nor have reached AA. What the Cubs received is a huge stretch.

          Reply
      • mlbfan9764

        4 years ago

        Aaron – good point on Contreras because the Cubs would need him to mentor Miguel Amaya (if he makes the 2021 team).

        1
        Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        I agree. Since 2016-2020, Darvish and Davies have surprisingly close stats. Davies having a better record, and Darvish having a slightly better ERA. If this is the only trade the Cubs make, I think they are still the favorite in the division.

        Having Darvish for 3 years rather than Davies for one, is a huge advantage, but the Cubs got 4 solid prospects.

        1
        Reply
        • cards04

          4 years ago

          I agree. I think that the Pads definitely won, for now, but j think it’s being overblown. If Darvish continues putting up dominant numbers, but who can say that he won’t get injured or return to his 2018 form. In that case Davies is the better option, cheaper and just as good if that situation plays out. (It may not, Darvish still could be an ace, not saying his great recent run is coming to an end as he is still very talented.)

          Reply
      • jrussell92024

        4 years ago

        4 solid prospects all outside the top 100

        3
        Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          Interpreted as: 4 solid prospects that you never heard of.

          2
          Reply
      • whosyourmomma

        4 years ago

        Ok but does anyone honestly think they compete with the elite teams outside of weak looking NL Central for 2021?

        1
        Reply
    • padreforlife

      4 years ago

      NL Central so weak they could still win it

      8
      Reply
    • iverbure

      4 years ago

      Say it with me. That’s it!!!! Stop pretending like you know the value of players in this market place and just realize Lindor, and anyone else will be traded for significantly less than most people here think they should be.

      5
      Reply
    • Robert-5

      4 years ago

      Pathetic move and return. Davies?! Yuck. Time to keep goin and dump Hendricks, Rizzo, Bryant, Heyward, Baez, Contreras etc, etc

      7
      Reply
      • iverbure

        4 years ago

        Do you people that constantly say one team gets fleeced ever go back and read your own reactions to trades because I see the same people constantly shocked at the lite returns. That’s why I make fun of you by saying that’s it! Every trade.

        1
        Reply
      • Goose

        4 years ago

        Cubs are stuck with Heyward. They are going to have to wait until the contract expires or give away an asset to just get rid of him.

        Reply
    • Lanidrac

      4 years ago

      It depends on what the Cubs do with the money they just freed up. If they reinvest it in more pitching, then alongside Davies it could very well make them an overall better team considering their current severe lack of pitching depth.

      1
      Reply
    • jhomeslice

      4 years ago

      This is a horrible trade for the Cubs. Not a single prospect in the Padres top 10, are you kidding? The Padres are “geniuses” I guess… they get Darvish and Clevinger (even though Clevinger won’t pitch again til 2022) for like 12 mediocre players, and not a single one of their top prospects. That’s hard to believe. I don’t understand these trades from the Indians and Cubs standpoint, but great for the Pads.

      Padres are going to be the best team in the NL for several years I think. I like their team over the Dodgers. In 2022 when Clevinger returns, geez.

      5
      Reply
      • braves2

        4 years ago

        just speculation, but I’d assume that is the best offer both teams received. Doubt many teams wanted to take on Darvish’s contract, especially with uncertainty on what darvish you are getting. and you lose clevinger for an entire year right off the bat.

        3
        Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          The Clevenger loss was painful. Nice to see Pads management not cry in their beer and instead go out and nab two Cy Young contenders to fill the void without increasing overall payroll and without parting with any of their top 10 prospects.

          5
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          How did they not increase payroll?

          Reply
        • Hammmbone

          4 years ago

          This is Clevingers’ 2nd TJ surgery, not his 1st. Who knows how he’ll return.

          Reply
      • hittingnull

        4 years ago

        Padres system is top three of all MLB. Their 11-20 prospect range are 1-10 in many other farm systems.

        4
        Reply
        • stormie

          4 years ago

          That’s getting carried away. They had a top 3 system primarily because they had 3 of the top 25 prospects in baseball in it, not because their system is so incredibly stacked with elite talent that their 11th best prospect is ranking as any team’s #1, or even as most teams’ #5. At best, their 11 might be a 3-5 in a really bad system like the Astros or Red Sox.

          Reply
        • Hammmbone

          4 years ago

          hittingnull, that isn’t necessarily true. None of those prospects is top 100 in MLB. Depth pieces for a good farm maybe, but don’t overstate their talent because of the system they are in.

          Reply
    • hittingnull

      4 years ago

      Will we see the Cardinals clinch the division with 69 wins?

      1
      Reply
    • FredMcGriff for the HOF

      4 years ago

      Watch out Dodgers! Here come the Padres!

      3
      Reply
    • 67redsox

      4 years ago

      An excellent move by the Cubs. Darvish has zero chance of staying healthy and in return they get a pitcher, Zach Davies, who will win more than Darvish not to mention some reasonable prospects. One thing the Padres do lead MLB in is over-paid players…Darvish, Myers, Hosmer, Pomeranz, Pham and Machado.

      1
      Reply
    • 17dizzy

      4 years ago

      Cards Fans can just fantasize of having Owners or even a competent president of baseball operations willing to invest in a potential National League Championship team.

      Instead of setting their goal to just be a .500 team. Sure —- A .500 record could win the Central Division this year easily. But —- they can’t compete with the big boys for a National league Championship

      Reply
    • MadSkillsUniversity

      4 years ago

      Yu is a great pitcher who needs to grow up and get off Social Media. That said, SD is the team to beat now. LOL Great moves by that organization.

      2
      Reply
    • Tim_Buck-Two

      4 years ago

      These prospects the Cubs got are young long way off. These are the types of trades that will help a team if the players develop. If all three of them hit the majors and have 20+ homerun seasons like projected then this trade will look genius for the Cubs.

      The Padres are obviously going for it, great times to live on the West Coast

      Reply
  2. soxsam32

    4 years ago

    Holy crap. They pulled it off

    7
    Reply
    • Far Beyond Driven

      4 years ago

      Padres are going to be insanely good. Dodgers fans are sweating right now.

      18
      Reply
      • Michael Chaney

        4 years ago

        I agree the Padres are going to be incredible, but I doubt the Dodgers really care. They’re still riding their title high.

        7
        Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          I would think that the Dodgers were striving to win an actual title, rather than riding the high of an asterisk.

          5
          Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          The Dodgers win big every year and will continue to do so. Btw, where do you see an asterisk? There aren’t any in the MLB record book. Not one.

          4
          Reply
        • letsplaytwo

          4 years ago

          @Brewer88 If the Dodgers had not enjoyed such great success the past eight years, your post would hold some credibility. If the Brewers would have won the 2020 World Series, their accomplishment would be well deserving of an asterisk. But not for this incredibly talented Dodgers team.

          2
          Reply
        • Col. Taylor

          4 years ago

          the only asterisk is 2017

          2
          Reply
        • CommentsSectionCommenter

          4 years ago

          @Brewer88:

          When you post something like this, you remind me of one of my favorite Mark Twain turns of phrase:

          “Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than open your mouth and remove all doubt.”

          Dodgers beat the National League’s other-best and the AL’s very best with virtually no off-days in a stadium half the country away from Chavez Ravine. Their WS victory is, in many ways, more impressive than one in a “normal” season (re: one that doesn’t involve playing against a team later found to have been cheating, etc.).

          Silly comment.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          I never said it wasn’t a great achievement? Just very different than a standard season I’m sure you agree. They overcame a longstanding playoff bugaboo and I was really happy for Keyshaw. My point was to the Dodger fans here reciting last seasons success as leverage over 2021, when in fact we don’t yet know who will be the best team next year. Maybe the Nats again or Cubs, who knows

          Reply
      • LADODGERS23

        4 years ago

        Not really.

        Reply
        • Far Beyond Driven

          4 years ago

          Yeah, okay.

          1
          Reply
      • EndinStealth

        4 years ago

        Just hope his 2020 season wasn’t a fluke. If he regresses back to having control issues you guys would have been better off keeping Davies.

        1
        Reply
        • gbs42

          4 years ago

          Darvish’s control has been excellent since about July of 2019.

          1
          Reply
        • EndinStealth

          4 years ago

          Yes. Like I said hope he doesn’t regress to before that. What part didnt you understand?

          Reply
      • Chemo850

        4 years ago

        I frankly don’t care about either team, but the Dodgers are the best team in baseball by about ten miles. And the Padres rotation is still terrible in my opinion despite these two additions. They basically just added another often injured starter when they already had one of those.

        5
        Reply
        • braves2

          4 years ago

          10 miles? ok

          5
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          David Price, $30 million, IR

          1
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          I don’t mean this as an insult, but how is it that you don’t understand that Price cost the LAD $0.00 in 2020?

          Are you not aware that Price chose to sit out the season? Y’all need to try to keep more current with BB issues if you want to comment.

          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Context is everything. Yes I know he sat out but my point is that they paid him $30 at age 35. So Pads paying $20 for Yu isn’t so expensive as folks seem to be implying here.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          Of course Yu is not expensive. If he wasn’t worth $20M, the return for him would be -0- or less. So why post Price & the IR?

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          My point: good teams are willing to pay extra to get the edge. Dodgers signed Price for $30m. Pads just nabbed Yu for $20m. Risks worth taking, sometimes.

          Reply
      • fox471 Dave

        4 years ago

        Flags fly forever.

        1
        Reply
      • Chief Two Hands

        4 years ago

        Dodgers fans aren’t sweating at all. The Padres have likely improved, but the Dodgers are still easily better. Padres fans predict they will win the division every season, it seems, and they never really come close in the end. The upcoming season will likely be more of the same.

        4
        Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Amazing though how many Dodger fans are posting on this Rumor that has supposedly nothing to do with or concern them.

          8
          Reply
        • Enrico Pallazzo

          4 years ago

          Nothing to do with the Brewers either …. yet here you are.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Brewer88 has nothing to do with baseball or Milwaukee Enrico.

          2
          Reply
        • CommentsSectionCommenter

          4 years ago

          @Brewer88:

          Amazing? Really? I think most Dodgers fans recognize that SD is, along with Atlanta, one of the two real threats in the National League, and the additions of Snell and now Darvish make a potentially great team in SD potentially even greater.

          And unlike ATL, the Padres are LA’s direct division rival.

          And this is literally a site that exists for folks to come to the comments section and discuss the moves aggregated for our reading pleasure and informational enjoyment.

          What about Dodgers’ fans coming here to discuss a big move by their direct rival is…amazing, then?

          Should they all just gather somewhere else, then, to continue to celebrate their team’s championship?

          Or…………

          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Yes this is a site for everyone to comment. You missed the point – I responded to a LA fan who thought to come in to the article and say they weren’t concerned about Pads 3 big signings because the Dodgers were still so ultimately superior. That might be a valid point, but to say you’re not concerned at all, while at the same time going to great lengths to take the time to post that here, exposes perhaps some insecurity.

          2
          Reply
        • Far Beyond Driven

          4 years ago

          Gotta love the Dodgers fans who think they’re still a 100 win team, as if they’re not even aware that they’ll be playing 19 games against the Padres. These are what we call bandwagon fans. Let’s see how many of them stick around after the Padres leapfrog their team in the division.

          2
          Reply
        • Tatsumaki

          4 years ago

          Far beyond driven, we will all still be here will you? Last year there were several padres homers like yourself claiming the nl went through them and guess what? 3 game sweep! Magically all the padres trolls disappeared until there team makes a few moves and boom as if we forgot last year….last time I checked padres scored 6 runs over 3 games against dodgers chalk it up to injuries? Everyone on padres roster played except Yates and lamet. Neither Clevinger, lamet, darvish or snell help you score more runs lol

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Every team has those Trolls, real fans of the game know who they are. I have friends who are great Dodger or Padre fans that I respect. It’s just good fun.

          1
          Reply
        • CommentsSectionCommenter

          4 years ago

          You know the Dodgers won the World Series a couple months back, right? And did so while going wire-to-wire and winning at a .717 pace? And when every bandwagon-hater screamed “small sample size!” and “watch out for SD/ATL/TB!.” it…didn’t matter?

          It’s not that we think our team is still a 100-win ballclub; it’s that we literally JUST WATCHED THEM be much better than that.

          Oh, and we’ve gone to three of the last four WS, and are one of the great franchises in MLB–and really, American sports history.

          So…bandwagon?

          Ummm.

          Sure.

          Reply
        • CommentsSectionCommenter

          4 years ago

          Oh, it’s more than insecurity; the Padres were a tough out two days ago, and now are every bit the equal of the Dodgers at the moment.

          I have to think that there’s a Dodgers move or two coming, if only for the arms-race aspect of it all.

          If we don’t add a bullpen arm beyond the projects (cough, cough Liam Hendriks cough) and, frankly, another starter–because if we’re being honest with ourselves, Kershaw could be cooked at any moment and Price may or may not be a thing and who knows what Gonsolin/May/Urias really REALLY are, then…SD will have definitely won the offseason.

          I’d still rather win October though.

          Reply
        • Far Beyond Driven

          4 years ago

          @Jmac2020 I’m a Mets fan. Bandwagon fans just aren’t hard to spot.

          2
          Reply
        • Chief Two Hands

          4 years ago

          Dodgers fans are just responding to Padres fans singling out the Dodgers fan base…you are a Brewers fan pandering to the Padres fan base. Hate to use the out-dated reference, but get a life, man.

          Reply
        • Chief Two Hands

          4 years ago

          Those are just responses to people calling out the Dodgers. That should be obvious
          .

          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          I live in CA and am a lifelong Padres/Giants fan. Brewer88 has nothing to do with baseball Chief Troll Hands

          Reply
      • Hammmbone

        4 years ago

        Far Beyond Driven, Dodgers fans aren’t worried.

        Reply
  3. damascusj

    4 years ago

    The cubs got fleeced

    12
    Reply
    • Robertowannabe

      4 years ago

      How? If they,sent,cash too, then you might say that. That would defeat the purpose though. If the Padres are,paying,full salary then the value,back goes,down.That is generally how these trades,work.

      1
      Reply
    • MC Tim C

      4 years ago

      As a Cubs fan this was a terrible trade. They got no prospects of value. How do you deal an ace and not get at least someone like Abrams or Campusano? Those 4 prospects they got are garbage.

      4
      Reply
      • Orel Saxhiser

        4 years ago

        How do you know they got no prospects of value? And what makes you sure that Darvish at 35 will pitch better than Davies?

        4
        Reply
    • DrDan75

      4 years ago

      Welcome to the show, Jed Hoyer.

      2
      Reply
    • oldleftylong

      4 years ago

      The Cubs bottom five farm just moved to average. Padres have a top five farm. Something good will come from these kids in a few years, … unless the Cubs hire Dave Dombrowski.

      Reply
  4. James Midway

    4 years ago

    Davies is a good pitcher, sorry to see him go.

    7
    Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      4 years ago

      I wanted to keep Davies

      6
      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        You can have him back

        10
        Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          Seriously. Plz, take him back. I cant watch that loser all season.

          2
          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          I assume you know nothing about Davies.

          5
          Reply
        • Ryanemery8

          4 years ago

          Yeah not sure why you’d even make a comment like that ‍♂️

          Reply
        • lambeau gang

          4 years ago

          I’d love my Brewers to take him back so I don’t have to see him pitch in a Cubs uni lol.

          Reply
        • VegasSDfan

          4 years ago

          Davies was our best pitcher during the playoffs

          2
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          None of the SPs were any good in the playoffs.

          1
          Reply
        • PinstripedPride

          4 years ago

          Got a feeling you’ll like Darvish and for sure Snell a lot more

          6
          Reply
        • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

          4 years ago

          Didn’t the Padres get swept by the Dodgers?

          Reply
        • Eatdust666

          4 years ago

          Yes they did

          1
          Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        That this is the last year of his contract played into it. But I agree, he was the glue of the rotation last year

        Reply
      • Eatdust666

        4 years ago

        They can get him back, because he is just for one year.

        Reply
  5. Led Hoyer

    4 years ago

    Nothing but flyer prospects. Jed is an absolute moron even if this doesn’t pan out in 2025 when any of these teenagers will be ready.

    10
    Reply
  6. joncoley

    4 years ago

    Yu have to be kidding me!

    13
    Reply
    • Frickster1402

      4 years ago

      This genuinely made me laugh

      4
      Reply
      • jediknight

        4 years ago

        Me too.

        Reply
        • DT.J.B.

          4 years ago

          Dad jokes are always appreciated

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          The other day I was washing my car with my son and he said “Dad, can’t you just use a sponge?”

          2
          Reply
    • Eatdust666

      4 years ago

      Lmao

      Reply
  7. Cora the Destroya

    4 years ago

    Padres have a scary rotation if all pans out. Look out Dodgers.

    5
    Reply
    • fox471 Dave

      4 years ago

      Trembling.

      Reply
      • JAMES JACOBSEN

        4 years ago

        The Braves are Trembling also

        Reply
        • Cora the Destroya

          4 years ago

          Braves should always be trembling. They are vastly overrated.

          1
          Reply
  8. whitesoxfan1972

    4 years ago

    What?!? So sad!!!

    1
    Reply
  9. STLCards33

    4 years ago

    What are the Cubs doing??

    8
    Reply
    • ron swanson 2

      4 years ago

      Their owner is being a cheapskate, dumping Yu’s remaining salary.

      13
      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        And he’s been that way since the cubs won the world series.

        2
        Reply
        • Robert-5

          4 years ago

          Yep. He’s expecting to cash in financially for another decade off sentimental Cubs fans for that 1 long overdue championship.

          Reply
        • cubsnomore

          4 years ago

          I think he’s parring down payroll to sell the team.

          1
          Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Not quite, sounds like the Cubs will pay part of his salary too.

        4
        Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Cubs are cutting salary while still providing a solid replacement in the rotation, and picking up 4 good prospects to help build a future contender.

      Reply
      • MC Tim C

        4 years ago

        Those are not good prospects. How do you not get a single top 100 prospect in return for an ace? Idiotic trade by Jed.

        1
        Reply
        • iverbure

          4 years ago

          Maybe? Just maybe, and this is obviously true to anyone intelligent, you don’t know his value and all the gms in the league do?

          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 years ago

          When your ace was only a ace for 2 months and is in his mid 30s. And you decide you would rather have quantity over quality. And teenage international players don’t make top 100 list unless they are huge signings.

          Reply
  10. fsrasmd

    4 years ago

    I don’t see how this can be viewed as anything but a huge win for the Padres and a pathetic return for the Cubs. Giving up three years of a relatively cheap Darvish plus four(?) years of control of an excellent back up catcher should have gotten the Cubs WAAAAY more.

    13
    Reply
    • bkbkbkbk

      4 years ago

      I don’t see how a package of Knowles, Barria and Kohn didn’t get this done for scary perry amd the halos. Speechless.

      1
      Reply
    • Cambio

      4 years ago

      Give it four years. These guys are too young to truly evaluate besides broad projections. I imagine all four of the prospects will be in the Cubs top 10 since they were all in the Padres 10-20 range.

      3
      Reply
      • Todd Kemmerer

        4 years ago

        Agree, what did the pads have 6-8 top 100 prospects. And these guys are pretty young and raw. Not a bad haul imo.

        Reply
        • MarkoRock68

          4 years ago

          After the Snell trade they had 4 not 6 or 8.

          Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Cubs fans don’t have the patience to wait 4 years.

        2
        Reply
        • EndinStealth

          4 years ago

          Most Cubs fans lack the patience to wait 4 months.

          1
          Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          4 years ago

          Most Cubs fans lack the patience to stay two hours at the ballgame

          7
          Reply
        • Catuli Carl

          4 years ago

          What are you talking about? Cubs fans waited 108 years for a championship. They’re the most loyal fans in baseball.

          2
          Reply
        • Catuli Carl

          4 years ago

          You’ve clearly never been to a game at Wrigley.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Lol

          Reply
      • IronBallsMcGinty

        4 years ago

        In four years if any of these guys are any good, the Cubs will trade them off for a declining former all star.

        1
        Reply
      • MarkoRock68

        4 years ago

        Likely to rank 9th-11-15th and 16th with the cubs the Padres lost alot in last summers and the Snell trades in guys in 3-15 range. Now other then the Top 5 the Padres Top 20 is weak.

        Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          It took hard work and a few years but they were 40-deep, and why assume the elite farm system won’t continually replenish? Their top 10 players (Patino aside) are still intact. Scary to think, but they’re in position to use the prospects to get much better still, and this process is developed for the long-term.

          Reply
        • MarkoRock68

          4 years ago

          Apart from their top 4 they drop off sharply from 5 onward now.

          Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      If Darvish is relatively cheap how come Cubs fans were hoping… no… praying that he would opt out of his contract a year ago?

      3
      Reply
      • fsrasmd

        4 years ago

        No we weren’t.

        Reply
      • Ryanemery8

        4 years ago

        Uneducated comments, love em

        Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        4 years ago

        Because….Cub fans

        2
        Reply
        • Catuli Carl

          4 years ago

          You mean the best fans in all of sports?

          Reply
      • Catuli Carl

        4 years ago

        They weren’t. Not sure where you heard that.

        Reply
    • willyg60

      4 years ago

      20 plus mil a year isn’t too cheap

      1
      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        No, but by comparison LA signed Price for $30 million at same age as Yu. Didn’t work out but teams at the top are looking for any edge.

        Reply
    • willyg60

      4 years ago

      No way with Padres taking on Big Bucks

      Reply
      • rondon

        4 years ago

        You have no idea yet. It absolutely looks like the Cubs got a lesser prospect package because the Padres ARE picking up the Darvish tab.

        Reply
    • Enrico Pallazzo

      4 years ago

      Darvish is “waaaay” overrated ate this point. Wrong side of 34. Pretty inconsistent over last few years. More of a name than a true ace.

      1
      Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        4 years ago

        Jah, those ’20 numbers were waaaay overrated. “More of a name than a true ace”: them’s some savvy analysis.

        2
        Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Fact is he was rated as being worth Davies and a bunch of teenagers, even though he finished 2nd behind Bauer for Cy Young in 2020.

        Reply
    • BartoloHRball

      4 years ago

      It’ll be 2-3+ years before a winner/loser can be realistically argued. It could be a win/win, who knows. Obviously the Padres get the early lean because their move is for the next couple of years, and those prospects won’t be up until Darvish likely retires. As for Davies….the deal could be a fair 1:1, so then prospects turn into lotto tickets. It’ll be a minimum of 2-3+ years folks.

      Reply
  11. Cambio

    4 years ago

    Zach Davies pitches very similar to Hendricks. I wonder if the Cubs preferred Davies over Paddack, or the Padres didn’t want to include Paddack.

    Reply
    • I Beg To Differ

      4 years ago

      They preferred 1 year of Davies to multiple years of Paddack? If the cubs preferred Davies they need to fire everyone in that front office.

      17
      Reply
      • mlbfan

        4 years ago

        I have to agree with you. Davies was likely chosen in part to offset some of the payroll for one year.

        3
        Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          No Davies was not included as a salary offset smart guy. If the Padres wanted to get rid of him to offset salary he would have been non-tendered.

          Reply
        • mlbfan

          4 years ago

          I said, in part. The cubs would have to send some salary relief, if they hadn’t taken on salary. If not they would have gotten a fringe prospect.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Taking Davies isn’t sending salary relief. He is more than worth what he is making. If he wasn’t, he’d have been non-tendered.

          Reply
        • mlbfan

          4 years ago

          Not necessarily. It gives AJ some salary room to manuever. It sure fit in with the Ha-Seong Kim signing.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          1. It really doesn’t. He is only projected to get around $7.2m
          2. If Preller wanted to get rid of Davies to have “some salary room to maneuver” he would have non-tendered him. Preller wasn’t the one who asked for Davies to be in the trade, Hoyer was. What’s not obvious is why.

          Reply
        • mlbfan

          4 years ago

          No, I never said he wanted to “get rid” of Davis. I said “in part”, not a salary dump. Sorry, you’re trying to parse it into something that wasn’t said. It fits, Davies and Kim are projected to make similar salaries.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          Not even one bit as a salary dump. Only players with underwater contracts can be salary dumps.

          Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      Paddack makes more sense for control reasons. id imagine its the later.

      Reply
      • Cambio

        4 years ago

        If I were the Padres, I would have rather traded Paddack and kept Davies. Paddack may have the brighter future next season I would take Davies all day. Not to mention, Padres have the high ceiling pitching prospects in Gore and Weathers.

        Reply
        • Cambio

          4 years ago

          but next season*

          Reply
      • Orel Saxhiser

        4 years ago

        I wouldn’t touch Paddack. We will see.

        Reply
    • Marty McRae

      4 years ago

      With Darvish they can’t have both Paddack and Gore unless they go to a 6 man rotation. They will probably trade him during the season or next offseason.

      Darvish-Snell-Clevinger-Lamet-Gore is going to be so nasty though. Gore might move from back to the front too.

      5
      Reply
      • thareignman

        4 years ago

        Clevinger had TJ so there is a spot open in the rotation.

        2
        Reply
        • DarkSide830

          4 years ago

          *Adrian Morejon has entered the chat*

          5
          Reply
      • statefarm44

        4 years ago

        No Clevinger … he had TJ surgery

        Reply
      • antibelt

        4 years ago

        Clevinger is out for 21 with tommy john surgery

        Reply
      • Cambio

        4 years ago

        The trade seems a bit odd. If I were the Cubs I would have preferred Paddack given his control and ceiling. If I were the Padres I would have preferred Davies next season given his health and consistency. With next season being an all-in for the Padres, Davies seems like the better bet. Gore and Weathers will likely step into the rotation after 2021 anyway.

        Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 years ago

          If Cubs were interested in paddock I would rather trade him and give up less prospects.

          Reply
        • Play the Game

          4 years ago

          I agree but the Padres wanted to dump some money I’m sure.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Davies had just one year left on his contract, and is due a big raise in 2022. So of all their SPs they had to let him go. Paddack (who desperately needs a 3rd pitch and to regain location control over his fastball), they will nurse him along again next year on a $700K salary, hoping he can turn it around.

          Reply
      • DarkSide830

        4 years ago

        no rush to get Gore up anyway with their 40 man crunch

        Reply
      • EndinStealth

        4 years ago

        How do people still not know Clev had TJ?

        Reply
        • Ma4170

          4 years ago

          Prob same people that think Davies is as good as Darvish

          2
          Reply
      • BartoloHRball

        4 years ago

        That is a *filthy* staff. I have high hopes that the Mets can do something similar (e.g. pick up a mid-rotation guy and an even better TOR caliber starter), but SD can make these moves and not put much of a dent into their farm. The Mets will need 3+ years to rebuild their farm to even be in the top 10-12. I’m concerned about that staff for the playoffs (as a Met fan), but I LOVE that LAD needs to contend with SD now and they can’t just steamroll the division and have it locked up w. 30+ games to play.

        Reply
    • EndinStealth

      4 years ago

      I doubt Paddack was ever on the table.

      1
      Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      4 years ago

      Davies is a better pitcher than Paddack. At this time.

      1
      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        That ain’t saying much though. Morejon and Weathers are better than Paddack at this point. The Texan needs to figure out some things.

        1
        Reply
    • Afk711

      4 years ago

      Hendricks and Davies is a competition of who has more mediocre stuff

      1
      Reply
      • BBB

        4 years ago

        After facing Hendricks (average 87.8 mph FB velo last season) and Davies (87.3), hitters will be blown away by Alec Mills’ 90.2 heat.

        Reply
      • Cambio

        4 years ago

        It will be a competition to see who can be more Maddux-like.

        Reply
  12. Magnum

    4 years ago

    Amazing!

    1
    Reply
  13. schwameegrandsalami

    4 years ago

    AJ Preller ladies and gentlemen. Got Snell, Kim, Darvish in 24 hours, holy wow.

    11
    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      and they still have Abrams, Gore, Morejon, and several other good youngsters.

      7
      Reply
      • Cambio

        4 years ago

        I wonder if Preller makes a separate side deal, off the books with the other GMs. Kind of like Dwight doing Michael’s laundry in The Office.

        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Bro you’re implying he does what got the Braves GM fired and exiled a few years ago. Cmon

          Reply
        • Cambio

          4 years ago

          Lol. He got Snell and Darvish without giving up Cronenworth, Paddack, or any of the top 5 prospects. I dknt know if Preller has ever traded a top 5 prospect.

          5
          Reply
        • Randy Red Sox

          4 years ago

          Where did Patino rank?

          2
          Reply
        • thebaseballfanatic

          4 years ago

          Some sites put him at top 15, others 20-30 range

          Reply
        • Cambio

          4 years ago

          @Randy Red Sox – I forgot about Patino. I think he was the Padres 3rd ranked prospect. My bad.

          2
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Patino no longer a prospect after his rookie season?

          Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Campusano also still a Padre

        Reply
    • User 1104686089

      4 years ago

      The roomates (Jon Daniels and AJ) are having a nice offseason haha!

      Reply
    • whitebeard

      4 years ago

      Merry Christmas, San Diego.

      3
      Reply
  14. CalcetinesBlancos

    4 years ago

    FFS, couldn’t they have also thrown in the bat boy and the groundskeeper?

    2
    Reply
  15. oof

    4 years ago

    Geez! Padres have GOT to capitalize on this…

    But, like… as a Jays fan, please don’t capitalize on this while we’re trying to put our final pieces together.

    Please.

    Thanks.

    1
    Reply
    • YankeesBleacherCreature

      4 years ago

      You guys were the kindle that got the hot stove starting so that should be something to be proud of.

      Reply
  16. I Beg To Differ

    4 years ago

    Cubs got fleeced. They just gave away Darvish.

    9
    Reply
    • Tatsumaki

      4 years ago

      Darvish and Davies had identical splits last year and Cubs got 4 prospects in padres top 15. Keep trying though you were the same guy saying darvish is bad last night

      1
      Reply
      • I Beg To Differ

        4 years ago

        Remember when you said Darvish would cost more prospects than Snell. Pepperidge farm remembers. My how wrong you were.

        Also, I said Darvish wasn’t worth giving up top tier talent at his current price tag. Nobody was going to give up cheap control of players to pay him. Hence why the cubs only got prospects 4-5 years away.

        Lance Lynn at 8 mill netted Dane Dunning the #98 prospect. A fool like you thought Darvish at 22 mill, 19 mill, and 18 mill would net more.

        2
        Reply
      • I Beg To Differ

        4 years ago

        Here’s my exact argument from the thread.

        Padres, nor any team, are interested in:
        1. giving up top prospects
        2. taking on 60 million when teams are slashing financial commitments
        3. taking a gamble on Darvish at his current price.

        For a pitcher that
        1. is 34
        2. his 2 most recent seasons he was injured and pitched like a #3.

        Hopefully your 2021 new years resolution is either learn how to read or get better at trolling. Cause you’re pretty bad at both.

        Reply
        • Tatsumaki

          4 years ago

          The same dude that was saying darvish has a 110 ops+ is now saying he is a cy young caliber….ahahahahaha Davies is better than gore this upcoming season and actually helps major roster and can be flipped for additional assets in addition to what the Cubs got 4 top 15 prospects that could very well appear in the top 100 in a year or 2. Nice try but so far you are a liar and a moron. In your world though padres are perineal nl west champs with multiple titles oh wait

          1
          Reply
        • I Beg To Differ

          4 years ago

          You: YoU cAlLeD dArViSh Cy YoUnG cAlIbEr

          literally the article you’re commenting on: The Cubs, meanwhile, are losing perhaps their best starter in Darvish – a 2020 National League Cy Young finalist – as well as a quality catcher in Caratini. 

          Uh huh. Guess you missed where I said “taking a gamble on Darvish”

          Never once said he was a bad pitcher. I did say his most recent seasons weren’t impressive and not worth the money.

          Twisting my words to make you look smart isn’t working. Liking your own comments is just downright sad. I feel.sorey for you man. I really do.

          Reply
  17. tgallagher

    4 years ago

    How do the Padres keep making these trades without giving up their top farmhands?

    3
    Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      4 years ago

      $$$

      3
      Reply
    • Deleted_User

      4 years ago

      They did give up a top farmhand in the Snell trade. Darvish was never going to net a top farmhand with his age, salary and 3.60 ERA in the last 3 years.

      8
      Reply
      • Ryanemery8

        4 years ago

        Another uneducated comment

        1
        Reply
        • Chemo850

          4 years ago

          And yet….this trade confirms it’s not “uneducated”

          4
          Reply
        • Ryanemery8

          4 years ago

          The reason why preciado and caissie were not rated higher is because how young they are. If it was 2022-23 they would both be Padres top 5 prospects. It’s a great haul for Cubs, in a couple years even better

          1
          Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Patino was a major leaguer, not a farmhand

        Reply
        • Herc33

          4 years ago

          Patino is technically still a prospect, only has like 20 MLB innings and has like 2 or 3 starts at AA level or above. He’s still listed and tracked as a prospect and he hasn’t exceeded rookie limits yet.

          Honestly he’s pretty raw and even though his pure stuff is nasty his control needs work and he could probably could use some more seasoning in the minors before playing in the bigs next year.

          1
          Reply
        • VegasSDfan

          4 years ago

          No he will likely start the year in AA.

          Reply
    • Afk711

      4 years ago

      They are trading all their farms depth as opposed to the top guys

      1
      Reply
  18. bleedblue_22

    4 years ago

    Dodgers will finally have some competition this year…:maybe

    1
    Reply
  19. CheeseHeadPadre

    4 years ago

    Wow. AJ Preller is nuts.

    1
    Reply
  20. camdog23

    4 years ago

    Padres are going for it

    Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      They’re reaping rewards of their farm system and scouting. Hard work, investment, dividends. Preller gets the credit but it’s an organizational achievement and not a short-term process.

      Reply
  21. bilak33

    4 years ago

    Man. Out of everyone traded away this weekend, I think I’ll miss Davies the most! Been a fun few days though!

    2
    Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      4 years ago

      He seems solid. Also could be a decent deadline flip for Cubs.

      1
      Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      He did well for a max 85 Mph heater

      Reply
  22. psarg

    4 years ago

    As a Cardinals fan, I enjoy seeing the Cubs get absolutely ripped off, but there should have been at least one San Diego Top 5 prospect going to Chicago. Absolute steal for the Padres

    12
    Reply
    • i like al conin

      4 years ago

      Not if the Padres are taking on his full salary.

      2
      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        The Cubs are paying part of Yu’s salary.

        3
        Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      I would rather have 4 top 20 then a top 4 or 5 most times.

      Reply
  23. 420ambassador

    4 years ago

    wait did preller really just pull a fleece job?

    1
    Reply
  24. Rangers29

    4 years ago

    WTF! How tf did the Padres manage to pull off that minuscule of a package!?!? Terrific trade!

    8
    Reply
    • mlb1225

      4 years ago

      I know, right? While I didn’t expect Darvish to get Gore or Campusano, I expected at least 1 top 5 org prospect. They got back 1, top 10 org prospect, but that’s about it. I’m honestly shocked about Cronenworth not going to CHC though. Now that they have Kim, it made sense.

      Reply
      • Rangers29

        4 years ago

        Does this make the chances for a good Musgrove return better or worse? He is way cheaper than Darvish.

        Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          Better I think. In terms of who’s been traded, he’s closer to Snell than Darvish considering age, controability and cost. I ovbisously don’t think he’ll get as good of a package as Snell, but might get a bit more than Lynn. I think Musgrove will get back a prospect in the top 50-100 range as a headliner and then another top 15 org prospect. Maybe a third piece like a throw in.

          Reply
        • Rangers29

          4 years ago

          So a Rangers’ trade would start with Huff huh? Idk, I think it’d be fair if a trade with Texas started with Acosta and maybe two more top 15. Your thoughts? Acosta will be top 100 soon.

          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 years ago

          Worse. The 3 best prospect hauls of 2020 were given out by the padres. So unless they are in on Musgrove?

          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          Why worse? I think Snell got back fair value. Why can’t Musgrove? He’s super underrated just because he plays for the Pirates and doesn’t have a great ERA. He’s fantastic once you take him off the team who’s been the 2nd worst team defensively in baseball since 2018.

          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          To me, yes it would have to at least start with Huff, possibly Jung. While Acosta wouldn’t be bad, he’s a shortstop prospect and the Pirates have like 5 of thsoe already. The way Ben Cherington trades, we’re going to get back another RHP starter. I don’t think the Rangers have the pieces to get Musgrove though. For example if the Giants start going after Musgrove, I would expect at least Heliot Ramos as a headliner. If we’re talking about the Jays, then SWR. The Twins? Trevor Larnach. It shouldn’t be cheap to get Musgrove. According to my sources, Musgrove is highly touted throughout the industry.

          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          Also, while the Padres have given out the most prospects, Lance Lynn was traded from the Rangers to the White Sox. Not Padres.

          1
          Reply
        • Rangers29

          4 years ago

          Woah, you have sources mlb1225? That’s cool. I want to be able to say that.

          1
          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          Lmao, yeah. Like I’ve said to you before, reach out on Linkedin, get more involved in stuff like writing articles for websites, like I am doing now, and you can make some of those connections.

          Reply
        • Rangers29

          4 years ago

          I’m gonna dedicate this summer to getting my name out there. I want to really make my name known in the community. Take a good first step.

          BTW… how juiced was the ball in 19′? lmao

          Reply
        • VegasSDfan

          4 years ago

          You mean in the first half of 2020 as well

          Reply
        • MarkoRock68

          4 years ago

          His k/9 last year was 50% higher then careers norms, No GM will be fooled by that over a 60 game season.. Steamers and Depth Charts project a 4.20 FIP that is a #4 on a good team. Cherrington will market him as a #2 but rival GM’s won’t bite. He will not get a 50FV pitcher like SWR .

          1
          Reply
        • YourDreamGM

          4 years ago

          Never implied anything about Musgrove value. To break it down more. Out of the 3 best pitchers traded. The padres aquired all of them. If the padres are not interested in Musgrove, I don’t see him getting the return of Snell. Probably closer to the return of Yu. Except 2 less players. Of course the trade also involved a solid catcher.

          Reply
        • mlb1225

          4 years ago

          He probably gets something closer to Lynn. Similar numbers over the past 3 years but has more control, is younger and is trending upward. Darvish is owed way more than what Musgrove is projected to make and has been much more inconsistent. The only similarities between Musgrove and Darvish is that they’re right handed.

          Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        4 years ago

        All of these guys are immediately in the Cubs top 10. They had good pedigree and good performance on the field, and are 20 or younger

        When the dodgers acquired Jeter Downs and Josiah Gray, neither were top 100 talent. One year later they both were top 50. Think people are looking at this way too shortsightedly and claiming the Padres scammed them

        Add in Davies prolly gets 2 good prospects in his own right, Darvish likely got a barren system six decent prospects, while clearing most of the 60M left

        1
        Reply
        • Herc33

          4 years ago

          You lost me at Davies gets 2 good prospects. He was literally traded last year with Grisham for Lauer and Urias and now Davies is in his last year of Arb and making more money as a rental so his value isn’t going up.

          He does not get 2 good prospects on his own. He’s basically in this deal to offset salary and eat innings.

          2
          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          He threw 7 less innings than Darvish with a 2.73 ERA and 1.4 WAR. Only making 7M

          Last 2 years he was at least a #3

          If traded now, new team can QO him in offseason. I do not see why he wouldn’t have trade value

          2
          Reply
        • MarkoRock68

          4 years ago

          2 will be bottom part of the top ten, the other 2 will be mid teens.

          Reply
        • Tatsumaki

          4 years ago

          Laughing@you is the only one with a brain on this forum!!!!

          1
          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          No Davies is not in this deal to offset salary smart guy. If the Padres wanted to get rid of him to offset salary he would have been non-tendered.

          Reply
    • skip 2

      4 years ago

      And after this trade Padres still have top five farm system dam!!

      Reply
  25. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    A+ trade by the Pads. lots of lottery tickets but nothing more.

    8
    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      well plus Davies, but he’s a rental, as good as he is.

      2
      Reply
    • lolzmets

      4 years ago

      You have no way of knowing that.

      1
      Reply
  26. luckyh

    4 years ago

    Oh Yu!

    1
    Reply
  27. Douggy44

    4 years ago

    Why couldn’t we get any good prospects exactly? Hoyer wasn’t cut for GM….major disappointment from a huge Darvish and Cubs Fan.

    8
    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      You got 4 plus a possible Davies trade or comp pick.

      1
      Reply
  28. The_GrooGruxKing

    4 years ago

    You could argue the Rangers got a better deal for Darvish at the trade deadline for only a half a season than what the Cubs got for him

    4
    Reply
    • CursedRangers

      4 years ago

      Interesting comment. Going to have to think on that for a bit, but you’re right it’s a fun argument to think about

      Reply
  29. downsr30

    4 years ago

    Cubs went for depth of minor league system over quality. Just looking to rebuild that system for when they need to make dumb trades like Eloy for Quintana again.

    8
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      This

      Reply
  30. Gwynning

    4 years ago

    Boo Yaaaa!!!!

    Reply
  31. sdryder278

    4 years ago

    Jed making up for the shadiest trade in mlb history

    1
    Reply
  32. luckasred10

    4 years ago

    Well dam best team in NL West?

    Reply
    • Chemo850

      4 years ago

      Not by a mile.

      Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      Clearly Pads are equal to Dodgers in 21, favored in 22

      Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        4 years ago

        Lay down the bottle

        If everything goes perfectly, with no regression from the 2020 highs while also counting on guys like Pham to magically recover… you’re still the #1 wild card team

        2
        Reply
      • VegasSDfan

        4 years ago

        I would agree if Campusano sticks as the #2 Catcher.

        Reply
      • letsplaytwo

        4 years ago

        Hey Brewer88, you’re leading the league in dumb comments.

        2
        Reply
      • Tatsumaki

        4 years ago

        Brewer88 is just a salty giants fan, don’t mind him, his team will emerge from the cellars at some point!

        1
        Reply
    • damascusj

      4 years ago

      By at least 5 miles

      Reply
  33. User 1104686089

    4 years ago

    This is going to be the most interesting division in baseball hands down. Even Arizona has some interesting players and you never know about the Giants. Kinda glad I’m not a Rockies fan though, sorry guys, love your state.

    3
    Reply
  34. RyanSD

    4 years ago

    Lot of money the pads taking on, wish they would have got some back in return.

    Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      Actually the SD team salary in 21 will be about equal to that in 2020 which is extraordinary.

      Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      Almost like Padre fans need to stop pretending their team doesn’t spend

      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        You are not counting the salaries off the books from last year. Get the facts.

        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Hey troll. The Padres approaching 180M with no bullpen. They are likely to be at or above this level for the next several years. Stop complaining about money. The Padres have had it for a long time. They just now are opening the purse

          Reply
        • I Beg To Differ

          4 years ago

          Very uneducated comment.

          Padres don’t need to spend huge money on pen arms.

          Morejon, Snell, Darvish, Paddack, Lamet are most likely the starting 5.

          Wingenter and Castillo are back and Lucchesi may make a move to the pen.

          They have their core in Strahm, Pomeranz, Johnson and have other arms to work with.

          Theyll get some cheap options for camp and figure out who will fill out the pen.

          They have options for the pen and don’t need to spend big on it.

          They could also utilize Weathers and Gore out of the pen as well.

          1
          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Very uneducated? Hahaha

          The dodgers played at a 116 win pace and are adding David Price for free essentially

          You are hoping for the Padres to rely on 2 very young, albeit talented pitchers, a guy who didn’t make your playoff rotation.. and then you are projecting based on the best of Snell and the best of Darvish, even if it’s unlikely either repeats those levels

          Oh. And you want your bullpen to be mostly inexperienced, young arms. Jeez. What could possibly go wrong with that?? But I’m the uneducated one. Gotcha

          1
          Reply
  35. south side hit men

    4 years ago

    Now the Dodgers sign Bauer and the Padres are just a playoff team. What are the Cubs thinking??? They most love Davies (or his salary).
    Who is next out the door for the Cubs? Bryant?

    5
    Reply
    • CalcetinesBlancos

      4 years ago

      No chance. They’ll save him for the deadline after he hopefully starts out hot.

      1
      Reply
      • south side hit men

        4 years ago

        That would make sense. But getting a top 50 prospect for Yu would have made sense. Getting a top 100 prospect should have been a no-brainer.

        1
        Reply
  36. Nick Deeds

    4 years ago

    Dogshit return for the Cubs. Fire Jed Hoyer

    10
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      More like a Dogbone return. Amirite?

      1
      Reply
      • Eatdust666

        4 years ago

        Either works, to be honest.

        Reply
  37. Blah blah blah

    4 years ago

    Its impressive how Bad that is. Amazing work by Jed Hoyer to set a new low bar

    7
    Reply
    • Pkindaclub

      4 years ago

      Your name says it all

      Reply
  38. justacubsfan

    4 years ago

    Everyone trying to throw heat nowadays. Meanwhile, the cubs will roll out davies and hendricks for BP. Btw, i love hendricks, but idk how effective two slow tossers in same roto

    Reply
    • iml12

      4 years ago

      Don’t forget flamethrower Alec Mills

      1
      Reply
    • drewlegittoquit

      4 years ago

      3 now. Davies, Hendricks, and Mills.

      Reply
  39. paindonthurt

    4 years ago

    I can’t believe they didn’t get another even fringe major league player. This is just wow.

    2
    Reply
    • solaris602

      4 years ago

      To trade Darvish AND Caratini and NOT come away with even one of SD’s top 5 prospects?!!!! The prospects they did get back won’t be ready for the Majors for like 4 years if ever. Disappointing unless you look at dumping Darvish’s salary as a win.

      2
      Reply
      • quonset point

        4 years ago

        I would agree with you if the C sent was Contreras

        Reply
      • VegasSDfan

        4 years ago

        We don’t need Carabiner, he will be out #3 catcher

        Reply
    • iml12

      4 years ago

      This has to be a complete gut job rebuild unlike the retool we have been hearing about for 3 years. You don’t go after all teenagers and replace an ace with a 4 and try to win. Not to mention they didn’t get 1, not 1, fricken minor league pitcher. This trade makes no sense, none.

      2
      Reply
      • David Herrick

        4 years ago

        iml12, I agree, to not get one starting pitching prospect is terrible. I mean, make it a lesser return in terms of numbers of players by making the Padres keep Caissie and Preciado. Take a return of Mena, Santana, and Weathers. Or Morejon. Not even getting one of either Weathers or Morejon is inexcusable.

        2
        Reply
  40. dodgersfan445

    4 years ago

    Dodgers better makes move in response

    Reply
    • wordonthestreet

      4 years ago

      Haha no they do not need to “respond”

      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Because they got their title? Albeit just an asterisk

        1
        Reply
        • lolzmets

          4 years ago

          Enough with the asterisk. You can’t just keep saying something and make it the truth.

          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          60 game season is truth

          1
          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Again. Longer playoffs with fewer off days than ANY former champ. Best record in baseball with an offense on Historic paces in some regards

          They beat the 2nd+3rd best record in the NL, and the best record in the AL. how much harder can it be?

          You’re just a bitter troll to claim the title is illegitimate

          1
          Reply
  41. Voice of Reason

    4 years ago

    The Cubs didn’t receive one prospect ranked in the top 100. A total salary dump and embarrassing for the Cubs organization.

    8
    Reply
    • Veejh

      4 years ago

      Thus the reason why the return wasn’t that great. Pads took on all the cas.h and also gave a proven starter

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        Davies only has one arb year remaining.

        Reply
        • Veejh

          4 years ago

          Yeah, I caught that and edited.

          Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Turns out the Pads didn’t take on all the cash, Cubs will foot some of Yu’s salary!

        1
        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          “A minor amount”

          Sounds inconsequential

          1
          Reply
    • Chemo850

      4 years ago

      You’ll get over it once Darvish goes back to being his usual injured crap self in a Padres uniform. This was a massive win for the Cubs, just not in the way you and the rest of the fanboys had hoped.

      1
      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Wat you smokin ?

        Reply
  42. alproof

    4 years ago

    Now let the Padres send C Luis Campusano & SS CJ Abrams to the Tigers for RHP Spencer Turnbull & SS Willi Castro.

    Reply
    • i like al conin

      4 years ago

      That’s WAY too much to give up by the Padres. And they don’t need either of those Tigers players.

      1
      Reply
  43. mrkissinger

    4 years ago

    Will this finally get the Preller haters to stfu?

    3
    Reply
    • padreforlife

      4 years ago

      Winning more than a WC will

      1
      Reply
      • VegasSDfan

        4 years ago

        How about being competitive every year. And building on the playoff experience.

        Reply
  44. thebaseballfanatic

    4 years ago

    Trade summarization brought to you by 14yearoldbaseballfanatic:
    Padres get: Yu Darvish, Victor Caratini
    Cubs get: Zack Davies, lottery ticket, lottery ticket, lottery ticket, lottery ticket.
    First reaction: Hope one of the lottery tickets pays off… or the Cubs got absolutely fleeced.

    5
    Reply
    • stymeedone

      4 years ago

      Cubs dump aging pitcher with 60MM contract, and now have room to add in their budget. Not that much difference in expected results of Davies and Yu. Wouldn’t surprise me to see Davies start more games than Darvish in 2021. Plus four prospects added to the farm. Not bad for a salary dump.

      1
      Reply
      • Play the Game

        4 years ago

        Yu was a top 10 pitcher last year. Top Ten how can you compare him to Davies?

        2
        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Because Davies posted a 2.73 era himself and there are reasons to believe Darvish could regress. Could.

          1
          Reply
        • VegasSDfan

          4 years ago

          Davies also pitched well in the playoffs, not that the Cubs need to worry about that

          Reply
      • lolzmets

        4 years ago

        They aren’t having a fire sale to “have room to add in their budget”.

        1
        Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        4 years ago

        “Room to add in their budget”: you realize there’s no salary cap in baseball? Since when did the Cubs become a small market team?

        1
        Reply
  45. TXCubfan

    4 years ago

    Harry Caray just threw up in his grave . Let’s just hope this is another Dejesus for Bowa/Sandberg.. No wonder Theo quit

    2
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Ewwww

      Reply
  46. fndmwlsk

    4 years ago

    To be honest, I was expecting Wil Myers to be in the deal to fill the hole of the non tendered shwarber

    2
    Reply
    • 5toolMVP

      4 years ago

      Cubs were shedding $$$$ not taking back $$$

      1
      Reply
  47. californiaangels

    4 years ago

    time for the angels to get grey or musgrove

    1
    Reply
    • Kaleiw03

      4 years ago

      Then Bauer

      Reply
      • DarkSide830

        4 years ago

        lol

        Reply
    • i like al conin

      4 years ago

      I’d rather have had Darvish for what could be a comparable price. Musgrove’s stats can be had on the free agent market.

      2
      Reply
    • 5toolMVP

      4 years ago

      Or Carrasco or Marquez.

      Reply
  48. DrDan75

    4 years ago

    2021 is Davies’ walk year. Unless the Cubs can extend him, it’s a waste. I don’t understand this at all from their perspective, except as a salary dump.

    6
    Reply
    • anthonyd4412

      4 years ago

      4 prospects. The return wasn’t about Davies

      Reply
      • DarkSide830

        4 years ago

        4 lottery tickets, arguably all lesser then the prospects TB got.

        Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          Tampa traded a younger and cheaper player. It should be less, because Dervish at his age, price, and inconsistent history, is the lesser player.

          Reply
        • lolzmets

          4 years ago

          You have no way to know that.

          Reply
    • Priggs89

      4 years ago

      so you do understand

      1
      Reply
  49. PapiElf

    4 years ago

    Finally, I’ve been waiting all day

    Reply
  50. TXCubfan

    4 years ago

    This must be revenge for Rizzo.!. I still hate the padres and Steve Garvey.

    1
    Reply
  51. paddyo furnichuh

    4 years ago

    Nola-Caratini…that seems like an exceptional catching tandem

    3
    Reply
    • VegasSDfan

      4 years ago

      Campusano, Nola, Carabiner as the 3rd catcher

      1
      Reply
  52. paindonthurt

    4 years ago

    No one even close to major league ready. Crazy.

    4
    Reply
  53. 5toolMVP

    4 years ago

    Who was the genius that was saying Darvish would cost more prospects than the Snell deal?

    Lol

    8
    Reply
    • Tatsumaki

      4 years ago

      Davies had the same stats as darvish is younger and 15 million per year cheaper in addition Cubs picked up 4 prospects in padres top 15, go Lose some weight.

      2
      Reply
    • SwingtheFNbat

      4 years ago

      Yeah, that was total insane thinking. Young good pitcher, old good pitcher who gets paid a lot more. Hmmmm? Lmao

      Reply
  54. beyou02215

    4 years ago

    Precaido and Mena could be any kind. It is going to take some time, but they could end up being top prospects.

    1
    Reply
  55. everlastingdave

    4 years ago

    I mean, it’s easy to be intimidated when you see what your NL Central rivals are doing. Totally understandable move by the Cubs.

    8
    Reply
    • thebaseballfanatic

      4 years ago

      Underrated comment

      4
      Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      2020 NFC East – we are the worst divison in pro sports
      2021 NL Central – hold my quality talent

      Reply
  56. Jbarger

    4 years ago

    Hoyer should be completely embarrassed…..To not get even 1 of the Padres top 10 prospects for Darvysh? WTF was he thinking

    2
    Reply
    • 5toolMVP

      4 years ago

      His age 34+ and 3/$62 had a lot to do with it.

      5
      Reply
      • i like al conin

        4 years ago

        Agree with 5tool

        Reply
    • bot

      4 years ago

      He surely passed on a couple to headline preciado in the deal. A 17 year old already playing professional ball and a shortstop. Not sure how you’d expect much more than that ?? Comments here crazy

      Reply
  57. kenly0

    4 years ago

    I like all 4 of the prospects that the Cubs are getting. All 4 of them very well could end up being top 100 prospects in a year or 2. Disappointing that not a single one of them is a pitcher though.

    1
    Reply
  58. paindonthurt

    4 years ago

    Reports are Cubs are eating some of Darvish salary also. Don’t forget Caratini is under control for 4 years. This is Nucking Futs.

    5
    Reply
  59. DTDATL

    4 years ago

    I called it, said people would be shocked at how little they got back in the way a big prospects.

    2
    Reply
  60. russrcp

    4 years ago

    Diehard Cubs fan and really disappointed in this trade, top 3 NL pitcher and very controllable salary, and we couldn’t even get a top 5 prospect, come on now. Cubs were quick to give up top prospects in Soler, G Torres, E Jimenez, among others and this is what they get on the opposite side. Extremely disappointed, just goes to show it’s simply a salary dump.

    5
    Reply
    • Robert-5

      4 years ago

      Very good point. Look at what we gave up for 3 yrs of Quintana. Yes, more affordable but clearly less talented pitcher- still got a top prospect in Jimenez and solid arm in Cease. Disgraceful salary dump.

      3
      Reply
      • iverbure

        4 years ago

        Your comparison is awful. It’s a totally different economy. Not to mention Quintana was far more reliable. Who knows what you’re going to get from Darvish

        Reply
  61. Judge_Smails45

    4 years ago

    I can’t wait to see what the Reds get for Castillo/Gray/Saurez

    Reply
    • 5toolMVP

      4 years ago

      Hopefully 3 low level prospects from the Angels.

      4
      Reply
    • bot

      4 years ago

      They better have 3 separate trades lined up w 3 quality top prospects headlining each trade w good backup pieces. If not, reds should keep all 3

      Reply
  62. hossmandu

    4 years ago

    Must be nice to be a Padre fan this week. Wow. As an Angel fan all we’ve got on MLBTR Angel page has been “Howie Kendrick Retires” for a week. ZZZZZZZ

    2
    Reply
    • Superstar Car Wash

      4 years ago

      Your team won a World Series in 2002; don’t be greedy. Some children in the world will never have their team win a World Series, and many of them have to eat sand for dinner and drink dirty water.

      2
      Reply
      • DoritosLocosTaco

        4 years ago

        Well this escalated quickly

        1
        Reply
  63. anthonyd4412

    4 years ago

    Cubs get 4 high risk, high upside prospects. Those saying they got fleeced know little about baseball. Stocked farm system, building for 2023/2024. It worked last time.

    1
    Reply
    • thebaseballfanatic

      4 years ago

      Fire sale
      Simple as that

      6
      Reply
      • bot

        4 years ago

        Darvish wasn’t getting that return last offseason. Less simple than u think

        Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Great return.

      1
      Reply
  64. Cmurphy

    4 years ago

    Cubs just saved me a few hundred bucks to not have to get Hulu Live next summer.

    4
    Reply
    • Marty McRae

      4 years ago

      Kyle Davies is pretty good though.

      1
      Reply
    • Robert-5

      4 years ago

      Underrated comment. I think Hulu is actually dropping Marquee too

      Reply
  65. Marty McRae

    4 years ago

    Padres got Darvish, Snell and Caratini for

    #3 Patino
    #7 Wilcox
    #11 Preciado
    #13 Caissie
    #14 Hunt
    #15 Mena
    #16 Santana
    + Davies and Mejia.

    Massive improvements and the original top 10 is still 80% there. SD has such a massive farm it barely dented it. Terrifying what else they might do with all these prospects that they don’t really need because they have positions spoken for long term.

    1
    Reply
    • DarkSide830

      4 years ago

      Lindor. shove him in the OF if you need to.

      Reply
      • Marty McRae

        4 years ago

        Hader might as well book his flight to SD now.

        Reply
        • lolzmets

          4 years ago

          Maybe if he does you can get all emotional and feminine about it.

          Reply
    • Herc33

      4 years ago

      They did the same thing on the Clevinger deal earlier this year too. All quantity over quality.

      It’s absolutely crazy that they were able to get multiple years of control over Darvish, Snell and Clev and only gave up 1 top 100 prospect in the process.

      6
      Reply
  66. Bounty Hunters IA

    4 years ago

    Pure salary dump. Pitiful return for an ace with 3 years of control. Can you say punting 2021??? Sad thing is as bad as the brewers, reds and deadbirds are the Cubs may still squeak out the division since they still have far superior talent compared to the rest.

    3
    Reply
    • 5toolMVP

      4 years ago

      Darvish at age 36-37 could be a 2/$40m mess too.

      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Anything is possible, but what’s the point?

        Reply
      • Moneyballer

        4 years ago

        If he wasn’t pitching so well these last several seasons I’d agree with you but this guy has it working right now and worth every penny.

        1
        Reply
  67. Superstar Car Wash

    4 years ago

    WOW… you can tell Theo took all the algorithms and formulas with him. Aside from Davies, I’ve never heard of the “prospects” the Cubs acquired.

    Does anybody have some sabermetrics or advanced statistics on them? Please leave out old stats like batting average/HR/RBI, or wins/ERA/IP. Only sabermetrics please.

    4
    Reply
    • thebaseballfanatic

      4 years ago

      General scouting report on Mena I believe is average hit and power, plus speed, defense and arm, athletic but imposing, good instincs. Overall could be a goon if it pans out. That’s the only prospect I think I have any info on.

      1
      Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      If you never heard of those prospects then sabermetrics aren’t going to help you.

      2
      Reply
  68. Get rid of the softball players

    4 years ago

    Little theo epstein caused the cubs implodio

    1
    Reply
  69. JAMES JACOBSEN

    4 years ago

    Surprised they havent dumped Bryant yet

    1
    Reply
    • Cmurphy

      4 years ago

      Can’t get anything for him with that salary. The only hope there is if Bryant has a great first half and gets traded for something at the deadline.

      3
      Reply
  70. lambeau gang

    4 years ago

    Stupid question, but what exactly is the reasoning for the Chicago Cubs, one of the most iconic and recognizable sports brands, to clear their payroll? It’s not like they can’t afford to put out a good product on the field each year. Selling low on Darvish and other core players won’t result in a successful squad. Am I missing something about the financial state of the franchise currently?

    3
    Reply
    • Superstar Car Wash

      4 years ago

      The pandemic has ruined everything and every team has suffered catastrophic losses. Sadly, the game will likely never return to its pre-2020 ways. Vaccines won’t be available to the public until July or August, and over 50% of baseball fans aren’t going to take it anyway so it’s another lost year.

      1
      Reply
      • Priggs89

        4 years ago

        Yet the Padres can afford to spend…

        4
        Reply
        • lambeau gang

          4 years ago

          My thoughts exactly. Cincinnati’s attempt to shed payroll at least makes sense given their small market status, but the Cubs? I know the pandemic has negatively affected each club’s finances, but if San Diego can add ~$50 million to their payroll, I don’t understand the Cubs motivation to clear the books just to mitigate their financial losses. They still had a very competitive team in a faltering division!

          1
          Reply
        • quonset point

          4 years ago

          Ricketts has spent billions on the stadium and neighborhood, and the loot that was supposed to come from Marquee network hasn’t shown up yet. Gotta save some money until the people can come back.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          As it stands at this point in time after today’s transactions the Padres payroll for 2021 is no more than $5 million more than 2020.

          1
          Reply
        • filthyrich

          4 years ago

          They had the 3rd highest payroll in 2020 and 2nd highest in 2019 with nothing really to show for it.
          With $150m tied up and 5-6 holes to fill this offseason, they’re either committing to top $200m again, or somewhat conceding to LAD/ATL and find some savings while committing to make playoffs instead of win playoffs.

          Heyward and Kimbrel are huge handcuffs.

          They’re now projected around $120m and can add a few pieces without limiting themselves from making a trade deadline splash if they feel confident about playoff chances.
          Does any combination of adds give them confidence to get through Dodgers in playoffs? Tough to commit to spending.
          Just checking instead of going all in for now.

          1
          Reply
        • letsplaytwo

          4 years ago

          The Cubs will still be able to field a competitive team in a very weak division.

          1
          Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          4 years ago

          Or using the pretense of the Pandemic to Huizenga the roster, having already benefited from the massive appreciation of the asset due to WS’ 16. Ready to peddle false hope to a new generation.

          1
          Reply
        • stymeedone

          4 years ago

          I don’t believe that the Cubs have $50MM in space below the tax threshold. It may not be a CAP, but it works like one.

          Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        4 years ago

        But….but….Cubs not a small market team. Unless Cub fans have been Huizengaed!

        Reply
    • Robert-5

      4 years ago

      Selling “low” on Darvish..? No, the took the opportunity to dump a hot stock at its peak. I wish they would’ve landed more, and I would’ve been happy to keep Yu and retool around him. But make no mistake, he has been peaking the last year and a half. How long can he keep it up..? Who knows. But a good time to sell.

      1
      Reply
      • jk

        4 years ago

        I agree. 1 year ago YU was considered a sunk cost. Sell high.

        1
        Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Being able to afford a mega payroll has nothing to do with it making sense. With 3 aging, declining, expiring players. 3 teams that right now should destroy you in the nl playoffs. And little likely hood of needing to fill wrigley this year. It makes perfect sense to cut salary and stock up on prospects.

      Reply
  71. badgermike

    4 years ago

    Not an even one American in the prospects from the Padres. It’s an international game.

    1
    Reply
    • Robert-5

      4 years ago

      Truth be told, international prospects are more volatile. Bigger bang/bust potential. US prospects have been scouted inside out and are better known commodities. Just adds to the “lotto ticket” nature of these prospects. Not top draft picks, just international signing $.

      2
      Reply
  72. Mrtwotone

    4 years ago

    Trader Jerry Dipito has some company. Preller is got that itch. The Padres didn’t really have to give up much it seems and they got Caratini too!

    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      I feel like kramer test driving that car.I don’t want this ride to end.

      Reply
  73. xxbooradley

    4 years ago

    Forgive me for being ignorant but is the return for the Cubs that bad (I’m not familiar with the Padres’ farm)? Darvish has all those innings on his arm from before coming to MLB and has been terrible outside mid-2019 and on. If you compared it to the Snell trade it should be about 65-70 of his return. Is this worse than that?

    Reply
    • iml12

      4 years ago

      They traded a top of the rotation arm for 4 magic beans and Zach Davies. Trade might look awesome in 4 years but it’s not going to help them win any time soon.

      1
      Reply
      • Hudson6

        4 years ago

        Fernando Tatis was nothing but a magic bean when the Padres picked him up.

        2
        Reply
        • iml12

          4 years ago

          That’s a fair point but none of these guys are going to help the cubs win a very winnable division in the next 2-3 years. My only hope is somehow Davies outperforms Darvish next year. Hoyer will then look like a genius but I wouldn’t bet the house on it.

          1
          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Here’s the reality, committing to winning the central isn’t really committing to winning a title. Are you going to be happy with a LDS appearance? Maybe LCS? If they got lucky

          They’re committing to building a legitimate next contender. I can respect that

          2
          Reply
        • lolzmets

          4 years ago

          No you can’t.

          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Hey nonsense. WC or weak division champs often go on to win WS as recent history has shown.

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Your name is lolz. No one cares what you think

          Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Majority of fans will use terms like fleeced etc if a trade doesn’t involve a star or some websites top 100 prospect. Cubs didn’t receive any elite highly regarded prospects. They aren’t major league ready for years. But could be in few years. You want one elite prospect that could be ready in 2022 or 3 or 4 with less pedigree but still have high upside but won’t be ready until 2023 2024?

      Reply
  74. Jordan 5

    4 years ago

    Wow 2 solid pickups for the Padres. Just glad darvish is on the Padres and not my Dodgers come playoff time.

    1
    Reply
  75. statefarm44

    4 years ago

    They traded a 34 year old “ace” that has injury history and a ton of money left. If Cubs didn’t retain any of the contract, I’m okay with it. They needed to restock the system. Davies will slide into rotation and those kids will all probably be in the Cubs top 10-12 prospects. Cubs system was not stocked well at all.

    1
    Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      The Cubs are paying the Friars some of his salary.

      1
      Reply
  76. HubcapDiamondStarHalo

    4 years ago

    “Y’know, the offseason has seemed a little slow…”
    -San Diego Padres

    1
    Reply
  77. Ryan W

    4 years ago

    Good day (on paper) to be a Padres fan. I’m trained to be skeptically optimistic, but can’t help but feel excited today!

    1
    Reply
  78. neubs 2

    4 years ago

    This shows just how much pressure ownership put on Theo, now Jed to cut payroll NOW….there has got to be more cutting….errr…trades coming….

    2
    Reply
  79. estadel

    4 years ago

    A year ago the Cubs couldn’t trade him for a bucket of baseballs because of his big contract, mostly poor performance and injury history. Yes, he was great last year in an unusual short season with no fans in the stands.

    I’m not crazy about the return, but I was always waiting for the other shoe to drop with him. I feel like the Cubs saw an opportunity to get out of that contract while they could and took it.

    3
    Reply
    • thebaseballfanatic

      4 years ago

      I’d say this is the most fair and unbiased opinion on the matter I’ve yet seen

      3
      Reply
      • estadel

        4 years ago

        The Cubs got 4 of the Padres top 16 prospects (11, 13, 15 and 16) from the #2 ranked farm system and a decent starter who they may be able to eventually flip. This doesn’t sound all that bad to me.

        2
        Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          4 years ago

          And they could flip all 4 of those prospects in a few years for the next Jose Quintana. Genius.

          2
          Reply
        • MarkoRock68

          4 years ago

          #2 according to who? After the Snell trade lucky if they are Top 10

          Reply
    • jk

      4 years ago

      100% agree. Nice take.

      Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      He was really good in 2019 too.

      Reply
      • letsplaytwo

        4 years ago

        Darvish was “really good in 2019” in the second half. His ERA was 5.01 in the first half.

        1
        Reply
      • Tatsumaki

        4 years ago

        Brewer88 since when is a 3.98 era really good?

        1
        Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          230 Ks in 180 innings in 2019. Very strong second half when health improved. His numbers are elite over past 35-40 starts.

          Reply
        • Tatsumaki

          4 years ago

          Over the last 3 years an ops+ of 110 I’ll pass thanks. According to you the asterisk season means little to everyone other than the dodgers but yet you site numbers from that season to one sidedly support your already weak argument

          Reply
  80. leprechaun

    4 years ago

    What a terrible trade by a terrible GM. Jed never was meant to be anything in life other then Theos gopher. Ricketts sees it as just a big salary dump for him and his family

    5
    Reply
  81. dan55

    4 years ago

    Great for the Padres. I’m so happy that we didn’t have to give up any top prospects for this. Darvish is a legit ace, and Caratini is a capable backup catcher. I feel really bad for Cubs fans right now, as this move probably pushes them out of playoff contention next year, though all these prospects could end up becoming great players in the future.

    3
    Reply
  82. sss847

    4 years ago

    oof.

    Reply
    • oof

      4 years ago

      Yes?

      1
      Reply
  83. RunDMC

    4 years ago

    No horse in the race here, but really like seeing a rotation Maddux broke out in yearssss ago that sees control guys Hendricks, and to a lesser degree, Davies taking the ball. If you’re not getting Gore (and they never were) Davies is a really great consolation building block to go along with the newfound financial flexibility.

    2
    Reply
    • Herc33

      4 years ago

      Except he’s only controlled for a year and then hits FA after 2021

      2
      Reply
  84. MarlinsFanBase

    4 years ago

    Someone let the Mets and Blue Jays know that Padres didn’t receive the memo that they were getting every player. If they don’t get that memo over to the Padres, they may end up signing Bauer, Springer and Realmuto next, along with trading for Lindor.

    7
    Reply
    • Mrtwotone

      4 years ago

      But the Mets are still better according to Metsfan22.

      9
      Reply
      • Magnum

        4 years ago

        Hahaha

        1
        Reply
      • MarlinsFanBase

        4 years ago

        So true. We have to remember that all of the Mets OFs are better than Marcel Ozuna; the Braves aren’t as good as everyone thinks; the Nats and Phillies aren’t as good as the Mets; and the Marlins are so bad that, even in a 60-game season, they’ll finish 15 games out of fourth place – 25 out of first because Brandon Nimmo and Amed Rosario are better hitters than all of the Marlins. It’s proven in Nimmo’s OBP (but batting average is antiquated according to MF22) and in Amed Rosario’s batting average (but with an OBP that MF22 will not mention).. And Syndergaard and Stroman are studs whose absences this year was one of the many excuses…I mean…reasons why the Mets finished in last.

        1
        Reply
      • YourDreamGM

        4 years ago

        Mets are still best team in baseball. Maybe the dodgers are better. You is old, had 2 good months. Snail can’t go more than 5 innings. Lamant was a fluke. Just wait, the Mets have the richest owner in baseball. We are going to get Baur and Springer. Probably Hendrick.

        1
        Reply
        • JAMES JACOBSEN

          4 years ago

          Put the pipe down and back away

          2
          Reply
        • jk

          4 years ago

          lol The Mets are still in the conversation with Pirates, Orioles and Tigers until they show differently.

          2
          Reply
        • letsplaytwo

          4 years ago

          “Snail” CAN go more than 5 innings, he just wasn’t allowed to by a manager who was too deeply attached to sabermetrics and wouldn’t deviate from it regardless of how dominating Snell was in any given game. As Hall of Famer John Smoltz said, “Never make a move that makes the other dugout happy.” Every Dodgers fan was ecstatic when Kevin Cash removed him from Game 6 of the 2020 World Series. Thank you sir – thank you so very, very much!

          3
          Reply
        • A'sfaninLondonUK

          4 years ago

          @letsplaytwo

          You could argue that Cash’s (TBs) devotion to sabermetrics is what got the two bit Rays deep into a WS in the first place? Did I think it was a good decision at the time? No I don’t think any of us did. He stuck to the play book and got bitten in an elimination game.

          As for John Smoltz – HOF player – but as a commentator? OMG – I don’t want to hear if Yogi Berra told him to fork off to the left in 1978. For every Smoltz pearl of wisdom you have to wade through a morass of verbal doo-doos. And he never called Auntie Marjorie back neither…

          2
          Reply
        • MarlinsFanBase

          4 years ago

          I think we may need to consider that @MetsFan22 is the secret account for Anthony DiComo, Matt Cerrone or Mike Lupica. Or it may just be one of the most skilled baiting troll accounts on this site. It’s starting to believe that someone is really as delusional as that person is…At least an adult, but he doesn’t sound like a little kid, other than being gullibly and naively delusional.

          Reply
      • jk

        4 years ago

        That’s awesome! Maybe, the padres are in the same level as the Dodgers, Braves, and Mets now.

        1
        Reply
        • JAMES JACOBSEN

          4 years ago

          But there still 4th in the NL

          1
          Reply
  85. sjma69

    4 years ago

    Let’s just wait before making rash judgments. It would be nice to have FO explain what they are trying to accomplish. If it’s a salary dump, then let us know. Bryant next, no matter what the return.

    1
    Reply
  86. Mikel Grady

    4 years ago

    Blah blah Cubs fleeced signed Darvish he sucks blah blah injured 4.00 e.r.a. Pitches in 60 game season with now fans in stands so the mental midget wasn’t hurt. 162 game season and age 36 age 37 seasons we shall revisit your comments . Davies will have better stats next year

    Reply
  87. mlb1225

    4 years ago

    I honestly thought the Cubs were going to get back Cronenworth.

    1
    Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      No you didn’t.

      Reply
      • mlb1225

        4 years ago

        I did though. In the “Padres, Cubs Nearing Yu Darvish Trade”, I said that I thought they would send Cronenworth+Pham and a mid-tier prospect to CHC. Now with Kim, they have a crowded midde infield sceen and Pham would make a solid LF for the Cubs after NT’ing Schwarber. I also talked with my friend around 5:45 Eastern Time that I thought Cronenworth would be going to CHC.

        Reply
        • Moneyballer

          4 years ago

          Ok why? That would have been so dumb from a padres and cubs perspective. Padres for dealing cronenworth – I mean cmon they were never going to do that! And cubs for taking Pham who is not cheap and a poor fit altogether. You were way off on this one, pitt guy.

          Reply
  88. SupremeZeus

    4 years ago

    I think it’s pretty clear why Theo pulled the rip cord one year early. Ownership gave him the number and he knew what would have to be done to get to that number and didn’t want that on his ledger. Hey Jed, congratulations on the promotion…by the way, wear it.

    5
    Reply
  89. AdleyMVP2022

    4 years ago

    Padres are looking very scary

    Reply
  90. bigdaddyhacks

    4 years ago

    And still won’t beat the dodgers lol

    2
    Reply
  91. angt222

    4 years ago

    Surprised Myers wasn’t sent to CHC as part of the trade.

    Reply
    • thebaseballfanatic

      4 years ago

      Chicago was that desparate to unload salary

      1
      Reply
      • lolzmets

        4 years ago

        I bet they were desperate too!

        Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      It made no sense for the cubs to take on Myers $$

      2
      Reply
  92. Moneyballer

    4 years ago

    I like owen caissie but man he’s maybe 4 years away. Never heard of the other guys, guessing international signees!? I wonder if Campusano would have been included had Contreras been the catcher instead of Caratini. Tough to judge this deal but I’ll take the ace all day everyday so I love this for the Padres!

    Darvish
    Snell
    Lamet
    Paddack
    Gore

    Straight nasty rotation!

    Reply
    • bellybombs

      4 years ago

      Gore has 5 games at AA. Wouldn’t count him this year.

      Reply
      • Moneyballer

        4 years ago

        Gore is absolutely in the mix for 2021, you watch!

        Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      Morejon and Weathers are better than Paddack

      Reply
      • Moneyballer

        4 years ago

        I think not. Paddack has struggled but also flashed ace potential.

        Reply
  93. OCTraveler

    4 years ago

    Padres rotation still not up to Buehler, Kershaw, Price, May, and Urias and the Dodgers day-to-day lineup far superior to SD

    2
    Reply
    • Magnum

      4 years ago

      But of course

      Reply
    • iml12

      4 years ago

      I’d argue it’s better and throw in clevinger next year and gore with a year of experience, nasty.

      Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      Says the totally butt-hurt LA Dodgers fan.

      Reply
      • Orel Saxhiser

        4 years ago

        Yeah, I’m hurt over all those Padres World Series championships and 13 winning seasons in franchise history. Darn Dodgers. All they do is win 100 games every season and make deep runs in October.

        3
        Reply
        • Moneyballer

          4 years ago

          Yeah ok and then choke in the playoffs with one of the highest payrolls in the entire league. But hey you won the covid title, the little softball tournament of 2020, you be proud of that right there.

          Reply
        • Tatsumaki

          4 years ago

          Man, padres stans are so salty it’s always so evident that we live rent free in there heads and won’t ever leave. Just head down to petco during a dodgers away game and you will see that it’s dodgers stadium south. Such loyal fans of 13 winning season 2 ws appearances (both losses) including last years 62 game season in which madre fans said the World Series went through them….sadly only scored 6 runs in 3 games without winning a single game!!! Theylooked more like (sham diego)

          2
          Reply
        • Moneyballer

          4 years ago

          I’m not a Padres fan at all, I just like that they are making a full court press at your beloved dodgers and you’re so threatened by it that you had to come into a Padres thread and comment about it. Who is living rent free in who’s brain?!? Asterick champion dodgers.

          4
          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Lmfao you’re such a bitter hater

          La was on a 116 win pace. Think we’ll be fine. Enjoy the Padre bandwagon

          Reply
  94. bravesfan

    4 years ago

    Not that bad of a return for the Cubs honestly… they are getting a lot of heat but Davies isn’t that bad. My complaint here is you got a lot of decently ranked prospects in a strong farm system but they all have like 4 years to go before possibly hitting the pros. It’s one of those, well you might have just stolen the next Ronald Acuna who will develop into a superstar, or you just traded away your best cy young like pitcher for guys who will never see the show. Idk. High ceiling guys never hurt

    Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      They didn’t get a ronald acuna jr level prospect in this deal.

      Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Or Tatis. Because you know….Acuna and Tatis were once 17….

      Reply
      • Moneyballer

        4 years ago

        Right, and every 17 year old turns into the biggest stars in the game. Of course they got those guys in this deal, how could they not!?

        Reply
  95. jbc1972

    4 years ago

    Cubs management realizes something that Cubs fans wont ever admit…. their window was over and their farm system is terrible. Even with the Cards cutting some payroll, the division is all but ours before the first pitch is even thrown.

    1
    Reply
  96. Sliderdownandin

    4 years ago

    Dogbone’s hairy mother doesn’t even like this deal.

    1
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Yeah, now that you mention it, where is the loquacious Dogtroll? Crickets.

      1
      Reply
  97. Logjammer D"Baggagecling

    4 years ago

    So no word on the cubs sending cash to San Diego.

    Reply
  98. Chemo850

    4 years ago

    Not sure why folks are shocked by this return at all. Dude is injury prone and is owed over 60 million during a pandemic. If he was a free agent today then 20 million/per year is around what he would net. Not sure why people thought that a team was gonna eat that contract AND give up top prospects. I can’t wait til the Indians trade Lindor and people get their panties up in a bunch again when the Indians get a bag of peanuts. Dude has 1 year remaining at 20 million before free agency while there are currently three all-star caliber shortstops on the market who would cost less in dollars and no prospects. Yet I have Indian fanboys swearing they are gonna get a kingdom for that dude lmao…..

    6
    Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      I look at it as two trades:
      The Cubs trade three years of Darvish ($60M) for one year of Davies (pre-arb $5.25M).
      The Cubs trade their backup catcher for four prospects.

      I’m not seeing how the Cub s got fleeced. If Davies pitches well and they don’t contend, he can either be flipped at the deadline or turned into a draft pick. As for the four prospects, the worst they’ll do is get some badly-needed organizational depth. Four prospects and a draft pick (or an additional prospect or two) is pretty good considering where the Cubs now sit.

      Darvish is a good pitcher, but people shouldn’t put too much stock in his (or anyone’s) stats during a 60-game season. The guy will turn 35 in August and the Padres are looking for a big-time return over the short-term. They’ll kick themselves if the Reds wind up trading Castillo, who is more desirable at this stage, even though he’d cost more in prospects. I’d rather have Castillo than either Darvish or Snell. Whether Castillo is truly available remains to be seen. But if he is, he is absolutely worth surrendering prime prospects if you’re serious about winning a championship,

      2
      Reply
      • Chemo850

        4 years ago

        Castillo will net a nice package due to his decent health history, age and small financial commitment. The Reds are under no pressure to trade him. The Cubs situation with Darvish was dire

        Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          Castillo will surely net a nice return. As a Dodgers fan, I am bullish on not trading Ruiz, Lux, and Gonsolin but would make an exception for Castillo (May is untouchable). Two of them for sure, maybe all three and someone else if the trade also brings Garrett.

          Reply
      • Magnum

        4 years ago

        Cey Hey Hey… I’m shocked by your response.

        Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          Still a wide gap between the Dodgers and Padres.

          1
          Reply
        • LordD99

          4 years ago

          Cey Hey, no, I disagree. I don’t believe the Dodgers are that far behind the Padres.

          4
          Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          The Dodgers average 102 wins a season and are still improving. We have no idea how the Padres will do over a full season.

          Reply
        • Bruin1012

          4 years ago

          Cey Hey the gap has narrowed considerably if there is much of one at all. It’s not hard to see a situation where the Padres beat the Dodgers this year but 2022 and 2023 should be completely wide open. My guess after this year the Padres with Snell, Darvish, Clevinger, Lament and a guy who I’m guessing is going truly special Gore. That will be a truly scary Rotation.

          1
          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          We have no idea when the Dodgers will ever win a WS in a season of more than 60 games.? What’s your point?

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Ohhh yeah, it’s the Dodgers who need to prove they can be competitive for a full season and a playoff run

          Totally

          1
          Reply
        • Tatsumaki

          4 years ago

          Bruin1012 padres scored 6 runs in 3 games in Postseason and were out scored but 21 runs last season. Last time I checked the offense is the exact same, how exactly do darvish and snell improve hitting?

          Reply
        • HALOS23

          4 years ago

          Young guys such as Tatis, Crone and Grisham could all get better

          Reply
        • Eatdust666

          4 years ago

          i’m not necessarily saying it will have the same outcome, but remembered what happened the last time the Padres went all out?

          Reply
        • Bruin1012

          4 years ago

          Jmac small sample size sometimes it just doesn’t work out in the playoffs. The Padres offense is plenty good enough to win it all with the pitching they have. Really Jmac you trying to argue that the Padres offense isn’t good because of three games. Let’s be better then that show some intelligence.

          Reply
      • Doug Dueck

        4 years ago

        @ Cey Hey – in order for the Cubs to get a draft pick for Davies they would have to offer him the qualifying offer which could be around 19.5M after this season or at least the same as 2020 which was 18.6M. In that he is only receiving pre-arb 5.25M I am sure he would jump at the QO if the Cubs choose to offer, just sayin’

        2
        Reply
        • iml12

          4 years ago

          Agreed. There is little chance a guy like Davies doesn’t jump all over QO. He probably is a good candidate to extend for a reasonable price.

          Reply
        • Orel Saxhiser

          4 years ago

          True. He’s flippable though, and preferable to paying for Darvish’s age-35, 36, and 37 seasons.

          Reply
        • justme

          4 years ago

          Agreed no way they do a qo offer he is not good enough for that…more likey he is a cheap decent pitcher who can be flipped at the deadline for some more mid level prospects or more young guys like that got with upside to continue to rebuild the farm system

          Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Price and Darvish are the same age but the Dodgers pay Price $30;000;000 to sit on IR, what’s your point?

          Reply
        • Tatsumaki

          4 years ago

          Brewer88 are you just sad because you can’t say dodgers havent won since 88 anymore? Dodgers are only paying 16 million per season for the next 2 seasons and price is much better than darvish at this point in there careers. Dodgers also didn’t pay price for opting out, if you gonna talk smack at least know what you are talking about

          Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          4 years ago

          In which case, they’d be throwing more good money after bad, potentially stuck with a journeyman for essentially the same price as their “overpriced” inconsistent ace

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          Price and Darvish are the same age but the Dodgers pay Price $30;000;000 to sit on IR, what’s your point?
          ——————————————————————-
          This thread has more stupid comments than any article I’ve seen in MLB-R, but this is easily the stupidest comment.

          1-If you don’t know that the RS are paying half his salary, you are not qualified to make comments.

          2-He is not on the IR; he is on the Covid list. The LAD not only won the WS, they did not pay Price a dime, let alone $30M.

          Get a clue dude.

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          The dodgers pay price 16M you troll

          Reply
      • wordonthestreet

        4 years ago

        Cey Hey if you understood baseball you would know the Cubs are not getting a draft pick for Davies without a qualifying offer and the chances of him being worth a QO are slim.

        Thus there goes your entire analysis rookie!

        1
        Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          4 years ago

          wordonthestreet- don’t spend too much probing Cub Nation for deep analysis. Its a futile pursuit.

          Reply
        • A'sfaninLondonUK

          4 years ago

          @ Willie – That sounded really rude until you reached the “ysis” bit.

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Yea because Gausman was such a lock for a QO before last year? Or Hellickson the year before?

          Davies has been WAY better than either their prior 2 years leading up to their platform year.

          You’re talking so much hate WordOTS, but you’re pretty dumb if you can’t see a way Davies gets a QO

          Reply
  99. mlb9229

    4 years ago

    Feeling pretty good about this if I’m the Padres, feeling very unsure about this if I’m the Cubs, and am still not afraid if I’m the Dodgers.

    Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      Feeling great if I’m the Cardinals because no one else in the division is currently trying to win. This means they can fill out their roster with October in mind. That’s something they can do either in the winter, at the July deadline, or both. I’m not saying they will topple the Dodgers or Braves, but their advantage in the Central should last for more than a year. They can afford to be patient and smart, which is always better than desperation.

      Reply
  100. YourDreamGM

    4 years ago

    Thank you AJ. 2020 going out with a bang. Let’s get Musgrove traded to cap the year off, or ring in the new year.

    Gotta debate my grade for Cubs but should be at least a B. Padres at least a C. They paid the price.

    Ps. So much for gore lol

    3
    Reply
    • Raypistwit

      4 years ago

      This is 2014 corrected. Really impressive.

      Reply
  101. xfactr

    4 years ago

    I will miss YD, however his contract was extreme. they got prospects and an okay pitcher. Big question is how much the Cubs will eat his salary if any.

    Reply
  102. JoeBrady

    4 years ago

    Amazing amount of comments about the prospects the Cubs received, and I’d bet 90% of the commentators know exactly -0- about them.

    1
    Reply
    • swinging wood

      4 years ago

      The fact that nobody’s heard of them IS the problem.

      5
      Reply
      • JoeBrady

        4 years ago

        It doesn’t actually mean anything. Most fans might know one or two top prospects from a team. That’s all.

        All these guys are well-considered. All four might be 45+ or 50 FV prospects. I’d bet all 4 rate as at least 45. This reminds me of when Cincy traded Gray & Downs when they were likely in that #125 territory. Some of these guys are likely to develop.

        Or thought of from another perspective, three of these guys ranked high enough to get $1M++ signing bonuses.

        Reply
        • Moneyballer

          4 years ago

          You’d be surprised. A lot of fans follow the top 100 prospects and definitely know who are in their own teams top 10. So people are very aware of the talent that’s out there. The problem was last season there was no minor league season so no one got a look at this last draft class in action as well as all the INT signings. So these are newly minted prospects which is why no one has a handle on them.

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          So these are newly minted prospects which is why no one has a handle on them.
          ————————————————————
          I agree, which is why it annoys me when posters criticize guys they nothing about. Cassie was just drafted in the 2nd round. Of course he is not highly touted yet. Preciardo is 17, with the highest bonus ever paid to a Panamanian prospect. Mena just turned 18 with a $2.2M bonus.

          I don’t blame fans for not knowing much about them, but I do blame them for bashing prospects that they know nothing about.

          2
          Reply
        • Moneyballer

          4 years ago

          They aren’t bashing the prospects, I think they’re more upset that they got a bunch of teen depth pieces for their ace pitcher! No one knows what they will become but what we do know is that the big club no longer has a cy young contender pitching every fifth day and did not return a known commodity for him. Hope it works out, 5 years from now.

          Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      We know they’re 4 years away. Minimum. Unless one of them goes insane and turns into Juan soto/Eloy Jimenez and Mike Trout all in one .

      Reply
  103. BashBroJoe

    4 years ago

    I have trouble seeing what’s wrong with this return. Cubs are on the downswing and headed towards a mini if not full rebuild and got rid of a guy that gets that’s expendable to that type of mindset. They made their farm stronger and won’t have to eat any of the salary. Lottery tickets are fine. That’s what every prospect is. Even the highly rated oh so coveted Top 100 you all seem to cum in your pants over. Maybe just maybe Hoyer is smarter than you all. It’s possibly a great deal for both sides. It’s possibly a terrible trade for either or. We don’t know because paper can’t throw, catch and hit a baseball. Pads are win now. Cubs are attempting to replenish (and shed money). Nothing wrong with the deal at all.

    3
    Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      A big part of a rebuild should be building organizational depth, which the Cubs have done. They also get a draft pick for Davies if they don’t re-sign him or trade him at the deadline for more prospects. Also, they still have more solid veterans they can trade. Horrendous division. If Hoyer does this properly, they can be back in the post-season in relatively short order and be there annually. Expanded playoffs are coming.

      Reply
      • wordonthestreet

        4 years ago

        Cey Hey I see baseball is not your thing.

        The Cubs are pretty much in the playoffs annually now. Did you not know this?

        Keeping Darvish instead of trading to just dump his salary would have kept that going.

        Cubs are a big market team. They should not have to trade for 17-18 year olds to “restock” – restock for what 2026?

        Expanded playoffs who cares. Expanded playoffs lead to teams that are .500 or worse getting in. That does not make them contenders.

        The idea is to WIN championships. Not just squeek into the playoffs!

        Get it now?

        1
        Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          4 years ago

          But wordonthestreet, you discount the value of selling all those 2022, 2023, 2024 playoff swag to all the tourists in Wrigleyville. Who wouldn’t want a Wildcard round champions cap you can flip on backwards at the next Dave Mathews Band reunion. Stylin’

          1
          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          “The Cubs are pretty much in the playoffs annually now. Did you not know this?
          Keeping Darvish instead of trading to just dump his salary would have kept that going.

          The idea is to WIN championships. Not just squeek into the playoffs!
          Get it now?“

          You’re such an idiot. You contradicted yourself in less than 4 sentences. The Cubs with Darvish would be a squeak in team. But you’re mad they aren’t happy being that? Holy hell you’re dumb word on the street. Wow.

          AND you have the brass to insult others. Just give up

          Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      You’re correct, can’t really fault the Cubs in this deal, but one can question the series of management actions that brought the Cubs to this embarrassing place in time. The big losers today are the many pennant contenders out there who could have improved their chances next year by trading for Snell or Darvish, but didn’t.

      1
      Reply
  104. Raypistwit

    4 years ago

    The Rays got a lot of grief in the national media for supposedly tanking the team in 2021. Glad the Cubs decided to step up; we’ll gladly hold their beer.

    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      The Difference, dear ole Ray friend: Rays truly a small market team with a whip smart management team with a plan that continues to flip assets for buildable foundation pieces for the next wave of contending teams, and seem to hit on found value at a staggering pace. The Cubs: not so much.

      Reply
  105. Ryanemery8

    4 years ago

    I honestly like the return for the Cubs. Preciado and Santana, the two shortstops are gonna be studs. Preciado is still young, 17 or 18. In 2 years he would of been top 3 in the Padres system. And Caissian the same thing, would be near the top in the rankings. I really like this return and gives the Cubs a chance to win now and to add some really good players in a couple years to the roster, I like it

    Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      They didn’t land 1 blue chip prospect, not 1. None of these guys will be major league stars, they’ll be lucky if any make an impact at all. Organizational Depth, that’s all it is. It’s also a sign that the team is about to be blown up in a big way. Hopefully they can get something good back for bryant but I wouldn’t bet on it!

      Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        4 years ago

        Moneyballer- like the 2 rednecks in the old SCTV skit- this team is going to be blown up , “blown up real good!”

        Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Dear Mister or Missus RyanEmery, I don’t think even Preciado and Santana’s guidance counselors know how this will all end, but appreciate the unfettered optimism. Sincerely, Baseball Blog management.

      Reply
      • Ryanemery8

        4 years ago

        I do

        Reply
  106. hittingnull

    4 years ago

    Even with these two trades giving up so many prospects. Padres could potentially still trade for Luis Castillo if they wanted.

    1
    Reply
  107. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    didnt even get out of all the money too. what a joke.

    3
    Reply
  108. solaris602

    4 years ago

    A 17 year old, two 18 year olds, a 20 year old, and a rental. Most of us will be dead by the time any of these guys are even semi-ready for the bigs, and the law of averages tells us that AT LEAST two of them will flame out or be traded long before then.

    1
    Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      Which is why they got 4 guys back. Who knows, maybe they all flame out. Organizational depth pieces aka, what the heck are you doing?!?

      Reply
  109. Perksy

    4 years ago

    Now just need San Diego to trade for Gincarlo and we’ll be good.

    Reply
  110. LordD99

    4 years ago

    Very strong trade by the Padres, who have crushed it the last 24 hours.

    1
    Reply
  111. BobSacamano

    4 years ago

    At this rate half the league will have .700 records to the other half’s .300.
    Ugly- ugly upcoming year for MLB.

    Reply
    • Perksy

      4 years ago

      Not necessarily, there will still be some parity.

      Reply
  112. dazedatnoon

    4 years ago

    this is moving an asset while it still has value…possibly max value at that. good move and i guess we shall find out about the return in a few years. high upside lottery tickets might surprise….

    Reply
  113. joedirte4life

    4 years ago

    Thank you San Diego for breaking up the monotony. It had gotten so boring and all we had was continuous headlines of players I never heard of signing with the KBO.

    Once again thank you San Diego Padres for heating the hot stove this year.

    2
    Reply
  114. LordD99

    4 years ago

    So while the Padres take the lead, will the Dodgers rest on their laurels waiting for their next championship in 2052 after spending billions more dollars? Maybe that one will be in a season longer than 60-games.

    3
    Reply
    • pepenas34

      4 years ago

      I know is hard for NL west teams not to think of the Dodgers after 8 straight years. But what the Dodgers had to do about this article. This will make it more fun at least.

      Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      The Dodgers have the better roster and a recent history of success. While they’ve been winning 90-plus games a year, the Padres have been losing 90.

      Aaannndd…

      Speaking of 60 games, when was the last time the Padres had a winning record over a full season? The Dodgers averaged 100 wins per season over the most recent three full seasons and have eight straight division titles. The Padres haven’t posted a winning record since 2010 and have just 13 winning records in their entire history. How exactly have the Puds taken the lead? And how many years has it been since the Padres’ last championship? When was that Padres’ championship again? I can’t remember the year. Can you? Surely you must have attended the parade.

      1
      Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      Lol. Padre fans so obsessed with LA, you’ve convinced yourself LA fans are obsessed with you

      Living rent free in your head

      2
      Reply
      • Orel Saxhiser

        4 years ago

        I’m more concerned with the Braves. Fried and a healthy Soroka are better than any Padres pitcher.

        1
        Reply
        • JAMES JACOBSEN

          4 years ago

          Dont forget to add Anderson

          1
          Reply
        • Moneyballer

          4 years ago

          Yeah because that’s 2 guys! I’ll see myself out.

          Reply
        • wordonthestreet

          4 years ago

          @Cey Hey

          Boy baseball is not your forte.

          Padres now have 2 of the top 4 pitchers in the NL Cy Young voting in NL (Fried is was 5th).

          So they have two pitchers better than anyone in Braves rotation right now genius.

          Get it now?

          1
          Reply
        • RobM

          4 years ago

          And Gore joining the rotation at some point in 2021 too.

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          gore has 5 AA games under his belt. Expecting him to come up this year and be some savior is quite dumb really

          That’s a godsend if he does that. Shouldn’t be the expectation.

          Reply
  115. davemlaw

    4 years ago

    I’d be pretty upset if I were a Cubs fan. More than that, demoralized and crushed.
    Winning the WS in 2016 carries a lot of weight but it only goes so far. And waving the white flag by trading your best pitcher before the season starts, during a pandemic when all we have is hope, is something a lot of fans will never forget.
    I think the Ricketts need to sell this team because this is the type of thing the Marlins do, not the Cubs. Find a steward who will run the team, ala Steve Cohen style.

    2
    Reply
    • joedirte4life

      4 years ago

      Here’s the truth the Cubs should have committed to the rebuild 2 years ago.

      They could have traded Kyle Schwarber, Kris Bryant and not be on the hook for that Kimbrel contract because they would have been rebuilding and not competing with a flawed team.

      And now Baez and Rizzo have lost a ton of value so if you do trade them you’re only gonna get pennies on the dollar for them. So really In some cases you gotta hit the reset button and start over. But they hung on to their guys for too long because of sentimental reasons because they broke the curse and they wanted to hang on to those guys as much as possible which I cant fault but at least they got a WS unlike Cleveland fans who dont even have a team name at the moment.

      Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      What has Steve Cohen accomplished as an owner?

      Reply
      • wordonthestreet

        4 years ago

        @ Cy Hey. You just do not understand baseball.

        Well Cey Hey Steve Cohen has not been an owner for about a month now genius. What is he too accomplish by then?

        Oh well he put a new front office in place. A real front office with experience and structure and landed McCann as FA picking up a catcher which is a premium position.

        Get it now?

        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          So he signed a catcher who was a backup his nearly his entire career and got, what, his 15th choice at GM?

          Go Cohen!

          See how that’s really nothing? Get it now?

          Reply
  116. driftcat28 2

    4 years ago

    Wonder if the Cubs now trade Bryant and others? I’d love for the Yankees to make a move for a pitcher like Hendricks

    Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      Please they aren’t dealing Kyle Hendricks – give me a break!

      Reply
      • hyraxwithaflamethrower

        4 years ago

        *Anyone* is available for the right package. I doubt it happens, but if the Cubs were blown away with an offer, they’d be foolish not to trade him.

        Reply
  117. Dutch Vander Linde

    4 years ago

    Ok Mets the ball is in your court now. Time to make some moves.

    Reply
    • joedirte4life

      4 years ago

      Why do people keep bringing up the Mets lol?

      1
      Reply
    • mlb1225

      4 years ago

      More like in the Pirates’ court. With Darvish and Snell being taken off the table, they have one of the most valuable SP’s avaialbe once you consider salary in Musgrove.

      Reply
  118. wordonthestreet

    4 years ago

    You would have thought a good baseball executive would have gotten at least a top 5 prospect from the Padres system. I guess Jed is just a second rate executive.

    Reply
    • joedirte4life

      4 years ago

      Yea but Darvish was sorry in 17, 18 and half of 19 and has a big contract. He did great and was a top 10 pitcher in the NL last season but its not like they traded for deGrom. So I think the Cubs got a decent haul. The Cubs are just punting on the 2021 season is all.

      Reply
      • wordonthestreet

        4 years ago

        Joedirt I think they are punting more than a season. They picked up a 17 year old. Two 18 year olds and a 20 year old.

        The only major leaguer they picked up will be a free agent after next season.

        The others, if they pan out, are 5 years away from helping.

        Pure salary dump in my opinion. I feel it is obvious that winning the world series the next few years is not a priority for the Cubs and with these very young prospect you are looking at a long rebuild.

        Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      You don’t understand how baseball works. Just a guess that Hoyer knows more about being a baseball executive than beer-belly fans. Btw, what are your qualification for running a Major League team? Be specific.

      1
      Reply
      • sgtschultz

        4 years ago

        The only thing to understand is that the Cubs owners have no money and it’s a salary dump. Nothing more than that.

        Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        4 years ago

        You go Cey Hey! Confront the bully. This is fun!

        1
        Reply
  119. fsrasmd

    4 years ago

    I cannot wait to see the MLBTR poll for this!!!

    Reply
  120. Dumpster Divin Theo

    4 years ago

    Dumpster diving Jed

    Reply
    • Orel Saxhiser

      4 years ago

      How is trading for prospects dumpster diving? Explain.

      Reply
      • wordonthestreet

        4 years ago

        He (WillieWildkat) cannot explain

        1
        Reply
        • Dumpster Divin Theo

          4 years ago

          We can watch Cey Hey and wordonthestreet go at each other all day. Fun!

          Reply
  121. Peart of the game

    4 years ago

    Action AJ is at it again I see. Nice move again and it looks like the Padres won this trade (better than the trade for Snell for sure.)

    Reply
  122. justme

    4 years ago

    I was ok with this until i seen they are paying part of his salary that makes this look real bad..davies is actually a suitable one year gap fill…and the four young guys at least seem to have upside…even if it will be a few years till they ready its ok cubs will have a couple guys from there system ready this year and next so waiting isnt so bad if they pan out…my original thought was they will now probably invest the money to resign javy..but if they threw in cash as well then this makes no sense..for years everyone screamed about draining and not restocking the farm system so this made sense if they would of used the money to resign one of there own but..throwing in cash and caritini just stupid…cartini had some value that could of netted something in a seprate trade

    Reply
  123. Moneyballer

    4 years ago

    I mean in a way this is how baseball should be run from a cubs perspective. Cost them nothing in prospects to get Darvish, returns a good chunk to see him exist. If all teams could flip free agents this way, these big money deals would be easier to take on! It’s like investing in the present and the future!

    Reply
    • justme

      4 years ago

      You make a valid point about free agent swap but they threw in cash and carintini so for me that down grades this

      Reply
      • Moneyballer

        4 years ago

        Caratini is nothing (literally a light hitting backup replacement level catcher) and the cash was minimal I hear.

        Reply
  124. MarkoRock68

    4 years ago

    Likely to rank 9th-11-15th and 16th with the cubs the Padres lost alot in last summers and the Snell trades in guys in 3-15 range. Now other then the Top 5 the Padres Top 20 is weak.

    Reply
  125. Roper

    4 years ago

    Can Preller now pull off #12, #17, #19, and #20 for Castillo from the Reds?

    Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      No the reds aren’t that desperate!

      Reply
  126. ChiSoxCity

    4 years ago

    Typical Cubs trade (middling returns). Not sure how you end up paying partial salary trading away a Cy Young finalists. Seems kinda dumb.

    3
    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Pretty sure Padres are paying the rest of Yu’s salary. Cubs are off the hook for 60mil.

      Reply
      • ChiSoxCity

        4 years ago

        It’s still dumb. They’re giving Darvish away for peanuts. Cubs fans should be pissed at the return, but they gots the special magic kingdom koolaid, so it’s all good.

        2
        Reply
        • quonset point

          4 years ago

          Tatis, who you remember the White Sox traded away, was once a peanut.

          Reply
  127. LaFlamaBlanca

    4 years ago

    Jesus, how toxic are Cubs fans in these comments lol. Realistically what type of return did you really expect for a 35 year old being paid 18-22 million for each of the next 3 years? He’s been above average for half of 2019 and a 60 gm pandemic season. The last few years prior to those he was either hurt or extremely inconsistent. More than half of the teams in the MLB are cutting payroll because of the the uncertainty of what the pandemic holds for the financials of teams. That only leaves a handful of teams with the means and desire to actually take a gamble with someone like Darvish. Yet Cubs fans expected to obtain Top 100 type prospects? Really?

    2
    Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      Yep. Did you see him pitch last year? Controlled ace level starter should easily net a top 100 guy or two.

      3
      Reply
  128. cwsOverhaul

    4 years ago

    Padres bought a lot of fools gold in Darvish. Good job by the Cubs to dump him off the shortened season while at his peak value. 1 or 2 of the prospects turning into something is gravy. They’ll be Chicago’s second baseball team in town next several years anyhow while they remake their roster following 2021.

    1
    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      They’re still the #1 team in Chicago no matter how good the white sox end up being. White Sox aren’t even the 3rd best team in Chicago.

      Reply
      • cwsOverhaul

        4 years ago

        Sure. Ignore results no matter how it turns out. Lot of Cub fans or so-called start that way based off the superficiality of being more popular.

        1
        Reply
      • ChiSoxCity

        4 years ago

        Pathetic.

        1
        Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        4 years ago

        #1 team among 13 yr olds from Naperville and the hordes of tourists from Nebraska and Iowa. The ones who casually flip racist taunts while touring the friendly confines and consuming that fine deep dish pizza. Not #1 among city residents that are actually from the neighborhoods , knowledgable baseball fans (the ones who know whats going in-game and don’t just show up for the 7th inning celebrity conductor, Go Cubs Go!, and Murphys), and recent grads. Why do you think Len Kasper jumped ship from Cubs TV to White Sox radio? Tired of all that nonsense.

        1
        Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      I’ve been saying for years that you could trade away almost any free agent, halfway thru his contract, and be better off. I like Darvish, but a year ago, you couldn’t get anything back for him. He was starting to pitch well after his injury, but no one would’ve taken on that contract, at that point.

      And many fans were castigating Theo for the signing. IMO, the Cubs were smart to capitalize while they had the chance.

      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        Signing Darvish was a bargain from the start. It was never a bad move.

        1
        Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      Hahaha white sox could win a championship and the Cubs would still be more popular. You’re the ugly sister of the family, white sox.

      1
      Reply
  129. jleve618

    4 years ago

    Don’t you see what he’s doing? Potter’s buying, not selling!

    1
    Reply
    • NYYstateofmind

      4 years ago

      jleve618
      Love it, Lol!

      Reply
  130. charlesk

    4 years ago

    Rough day for Shatkins in Toronto: Snell, Kim and Darvish all gone. So far they’ve resigned Robbie Ray for less money ($8 million vs. $9.34 million last year), claimed Antony Castro and Walker Lockett (who?) off waivers, lost Lockett to the KBO, and added five young prospects to the 40-man… not inspiring the fan base after promising impact talent would be added.

    Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      Still early, lots of deals left to be made. They’ll get their big Joe Musgrove deal done, just you wait!

      Reply
  131. charlesk

    4 years ago

    Rough day for Shatkins in Toronto: Snell, Kim and Darvish all gone. So far they’ve resigned Robbie Ray for less money ($8 million vs. $9.34 million last year), claimed Antony Castro and Walker Lockett (who?) off waivers, lost Lockett to the KBO, and added five young prospects to the 40-man… not inspiring the fan base after promising impact talent would be added and rumors have linked them to almost everyone not named Bauer.

    Reply
  132. sgtschultz

    4 years ago

    Cub fans should be furious. If it wasn’t clear before, it should be now that the Ricketts are only interested in the team as an ATM. The family had 100 million for election contributions and then claim poverty for payroll. Pathetic.

    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Don’t forget they quadrupled the value of the Cubs in less than a decade. I wouldn’t doubt it if they sold off everything and then sold the team for a massive profit. They’re fake fans anyway. Especially Tom Ricketts. You just tell he was always at the front of the class in school. Got to class an hour early. Probably sat in a lecture that wasn’t his class.

      I’ve said it before. You can’t just become a fan overnight like he did. 1 game in 1984 in the bleachers does not make you a fan. Especially when you’re 21. 99% of cubs fans have it in their blood. They’re born into Fandom. I guess that could be the case for all fans of all teams and other sports.

      Me personally I’m a 3rd generation cubs fan. I’m so much a cubs fan. I wore my Kris Bryant jersey to Rockies and Padres game. The Rockies mascot looked at me like what the heck are you doing. I did get a high-five from him though.

      1
      Reply
      • Dumpster Divin Theo

        4 years ago

        This. Sad feeling the Ricketts, reflecting the corporate titan mindset in their DNA, are Huizengaing the franchise. ’16 was great (thanks Theo!), but now would be the time to flip the franchise at an all time high. Think how much the team appreciated post-Tribune company. Hope that’s the case for Cub fans. Worse would be if they simply hold on to the Cubs and peddle false hope without a plan…a la the McKaskeys.

        1
        Reply
  133. link2217

    4 years ago

    I actually like the deal for the Cubs. Darvish has really only been good for his last like 24 starts with Cubs and with his age and salary was never getting top prospects in return. They shed his salary and restock a barren farm system. Yea they didn’t get 1 top 100 guy but got 4 high upside lotto tickets. Davies isn’t flashy but gets results. He helps keep them competitive in a weak division or is flipped at the deadline. Caratini is a great backup but can be replaced for a season until Amaya is ready.

    1
    Reply
  134. LaFlamaBlanca

    4 years ago

    Ha! Padres still end up in 2nd place maybe even 3rd. Snell, Darvish, Lamet, Paddack, and ?? They don’t have the pitching depth of the Dodgers and in a full season I don’t see Padres offense nor pitching keeping up with the Boys in Blue. That 60 gm sprint was nice but guys like Cronenworth, Nola, Myers, & Grisham have been overated thus far in a small sample size. Darvish, Snell, Lamet, Paddack have all been injured at some point within the last 3 years. Darvish had TJ in 18, Snell had elbow surgery in 19, Lamet had TJ in 18 & missed the 2020 playoffs because of injury, not to mention Clevinger is out with TJ in 21. Paddack was supposed to be the guy but he took a huge step back in 2020 with his lack of a 3rd pitch, reliance on fastball, and overall lack of experience . I just don’t see them unseating a team who just won a world series and will probably only get better next year. Dodgers will be king once again in a full season in the NL West.

    1
    Reply
    • PutPeteRoseInTheHall

      4 years ago

      You forgot the * next to “just won a world series”

      1
      Reply
    • damascusj

      4 years ago

      I love how the padres just live rent free in dodger fans heads

      Reply
    • damascusj

      4 years ago

      Plus its funny, cause out of the dodgers n padres, the only team that improved for 2021 thus far are the padres. Dodgers are losing a handful of guns. But hey, keep sweating, its funny

      Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        4 years ago

        LA was on a 116 win pace, are adding Price and likely not losing Turner. Anyone else will be replaced

        We really don’t care what you do. It’s pretty freakin funny how obsessed you are with thinking we do tho

        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          Some of the teams that haven’t won in a really long time, think they can talk like a champion before they win. I think the SDP are really good, but until they win, the LAD are the champs.

          Reply
    • padreforlife

      4 years ago

      Bingo

      Reply
  135. pullhitter445

    4 years ago

    NL CENTRAL is the worst division in baseball.

    Reply
  136. PutPeteRoseInTheHall

    4 years ago

    I think it’s safe to say we will see the Padres in the Playoffs at least

    Reply
  137. Dbird777

    4 years ago

    So, Davies and 4 $20 Cal lottery scratchoffs. I can already see the Ricketts fam gather around while Tom breaks out his last, er, “lucky” quarter.

    1
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Well said, Dbird. Why Davies then? Better off settling for 6, or 11 $20 scratchoffs. If youre going to tank, go all in. This smacks like a Jose Guzman to sate the memory of Greg Maddux kind of thing.

      1
      Reply
  138. nemolee.exe

    4 years ago

    What’s next? They trade Bryant?

    It’s Official. Hoyer’s tearing the Cubs apart.

    Reply
  139. capone14

    4 years ago

    I was hoping the Cubs would have gotten better prospects then what they got but as a Couch GM what do I no , That said Cubs have done well with international players and I always wondered why they found some great international players but couldn’t do anything in the draft . Maybe Jed was the guy in charge of International signings and if so then maybe this turns into a good deal then again maybe it won’t . What does get me upset is how the Cubs shoot seems like every Chicago sports teams seem to let players walk and end up with nothing therefore I’m happy the Cubs were able to look ahead and get something this time. They may even get more if Zach is doing good at the trade deadline maybe they deal him.

    Reply
  140. RobM

    4 years ago

    It does seem like only yesterday that Cubs dynasty was beginning.

    3
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Yesterday. All their troubles seemed so far away.

      Reply
  141. Moneyballer

    4 years ago

    At least Preller woke us all up by turning up the gas on the stove! This is fun. We’re all living in the real world and the guy is playing dynasty fantasy baseball with a real franchise! Chips are in the middle. I love it! Way to go dude, keep at it!

    1
    Reply
  142. E munchy

    4 years ago

    So how many top prospects are still in the Padres system after these trades? Or did they trade guys that were blocked by the loaded team they already have?

    Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      Not counting Tatis, think there are 3 main guys who don’t have legal issues still Around

      I thought the list was 5 deep, then they lost Patino and that catcher is still in some deep trouble, until he’s not. So 3? I could be missing one

      Reply
    • charlesk

      4 years ago

      They still have four top-100 MLB prospects in Gore, Abrams, Campusano and Hassell. Plus Tatis Jr., Weathers and Morejon are only 21. Grisham and Paddack are only 24. Cronenworth is 26. Machado, Lamet and Snell are only 28. Oh, and they just added 25 year old super-utility infielder Ha-Seong Kim… they also have multiple excellent playoff tested veteran leaders like Hosmer, Myers, Machado, Pham, Pomeranz, and now Darvish and Snell.

      Reply
  143. Rsox

    4 years ago

    A whirlwind last 24 hours for Preller and the Padres. Snell, Darvish, Caratini, Kim, and all it cost was Davies, Patino, Mejia, and a handful of lotto tickets.

    Reply
  144. Tatsumaki

    4 years ago

    I love seeing a padres thread and the common trend is “dodgers should be scared” “they won’t win a ring in a non shortened season” all while missing the basic point. The dodgers live rent free in almost everyone’s head in the nl west and for good reason, you can use weak retorts like “they always choke” “they always buy chips” much to the dismay that padres are doing the exact same things as dodgers yet get no flak. Padres will never be dodgers sorry to burst your bubbles. Padres improved but dodgers were in a class of there own last year and likely for years to come. All this comes with the territory of being top dog in the west, all you sad padre stans just further prove the point, you mention us in your own threads and try to insight a rivalry when there has been one (padres are bottomfeeders outside of last years shortened season) 13 winning seasons in 65 years 2 ws appearance losses says it all! Just know we don’t care about you guys, but I will say thank you to friar faithful for allowing petco to be Chavez ravine south every season.

    1
    Reply
    • HALOS23

      4 years ago

      On a trade about Padres, you are here bragging about Dodgers. Insecure, much?

      4
      Reply
      • Tatsumaki

        4 years ago

        You can feel free to filter through the comments and see padres talking smack about dodgers on there own thread!!!! Nobody needs to mention dodgers just be happy with your own team success. Just proves we live rent free in your head!!!

        1
        Reply
        • Herc33

          4 years ago

          This is probably the most unintentionally hilarious comment that I have seen in a while.

          Clearly not even aware of how ironic it is for a Dodgers fan, who is here commenting on a Padres trade, to be saying that the Dodgers live rent free in the Padres heads.

          Saying “you mention us in your own threads” doesn’t count when you come to that Padres thread and then start mentioning the Dodgers lol

          1
          Reply
    • Ryan W

      4 years ago

      Huh. It’s funny how many Dodger fans have been on these Padre trade comments

      1
      Reply
      • Ryan W

        4 years ago

        I think you guys used to not care, because the Padres were so bad for so long. Now, you can’t resist coming on here. You’re a little uncomfortable. It’s easy to tell.

        3
        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          “ You’re a little uncomfortable. It’s easy to tell.”

          Holy hell you’re so full of yourself. This is literally the ONLY THING HAPPENING IN BASEBALL

          It could be the twins or the white Sox and dodger fans would still be commenting

          Reply
    • csspackler

      4 years ago

      You sound like the guy who lost out on the hot girl and then dissed her saying “eh, she wasn’t that great.”

      Reply
      • UnknownPoster

        4 years ago

        No dodger fan wanted Darvish back here… nope. Especially not above the 6 guys we already have in house

        Your analogy kinda blows up when you consider basic facts. Jmac never wanted him. How could he be upset he “lost” Darvish, when LA never cared?

        1
        Reply
        • Brew’88

          4 years ago

          Yet you’re here investing a lot of time and energy into saying LA doesn’t care

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          I’m here to talk baseball. Spoiler, Padre posts were the only things going on the last two days. Not many other places to be

          You and many of your buddies insist on making every Padre move about the dodgers. And If you say stupid things and I happen to see it, I’m gonna reply. And many others prolly feel the same

          Still doesn’t mean the Padres scare dodger fans. Just means we call you out on your BS

          Reply
  145. padres2024champs

    4 years ago

    What’s crazy is the Padres could conceivably go after Bauer too if they’re able to salary dump Myers by getting rid of him and a top prospect like Weathers (who is expendable) for a mid-tier reliever. Backload Bauer’s contract so it really kicks in after the 2024 season when Snell and Darvish’s contracts come off the books. Bring on Pillar for defensive depth on a cheap multi-year contract until Hassell and Abrams are ready (with Kim and Cronenworth taking up most of the ABs).

    Imagine for the next 3 seasons:

    1: Bauer
    2: Darvish
    3: Snell
    4: Lamet
    5: Paddack/Gore/Morejon

    With Clevinger slotting in just for the 2022 season &:

    C/DH: Nola/Campusano
    1B: Hosmer
    2B: Cronenworth
    3B: Machado
    SS: Tatis Jr.
    LF: Pham
    CF: Pillar
    RF: Grisham
    Super Utility: Kim

    5
    Reply
    • Tatsumaki

      4 years ago

      Still not beating dodgers.

      Reply
      • padres2024champs

        4 years ago

        Not once did I mention the Dodgers, just said it would be an exciting team to watch.

        6
        Reply
    • Moneyballer

      4 years ago

      They didn’t sign Kim to be a super utility guy I can tell you that much. He will be an everyday player and the 8 mil a year he got, indicates their intention there.

      Reply
    • Very Barry

      4 years ago

      I foresee the Padres being in a full rebuild in 3 years. They unloaded a significant portion of their farm system for Clevinger (out with arm surgery), Snell (2 years removed from arm surgery) and Darvish (a pressure-situation choker who cannot function unless the temperature in the water is just right). They should have been patient and built up like the Braves. The Padres still have a weak bullpen and offensive holes in their lineup. An injury or two to a pitcher and they might not even make the playoffs. People keep forgetting that last year was a 60-game sample. There is a reason why production changes over 162 games.

      Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      I would place Snell at #1, all he’s ever done is excel.

      Not a popular opinion, but I think they need Myers’ bat (or the equivalent) in that Slam Diego lineup,

      And I have to wonder if they should solidify the backend of the bullpen rather than get Bauer. At this point they have no closer, but the Padres emphasize bullpen strength and I’m guessing they will shore things up.

      Reply
  146. jasondav

    4 years ago

    the truth is no one really knows if it a great trade or bad. the cubs got really young prospects and remember the kid the got in last year’s draft. So the jury is out . Maybe in 4 years they will all of these young players and be the envy of baseball or the won’t make it and the cubs will, be awful. i don’t know. The padres got a great pitcher now and the cubs may have something years from now. For anyone to say this a great or bad trade. No one will really know until years from now.

    Reply
  147. Sabermetric Acolyte

    4 years ago

    One has to admire the impressive efficiency of the Padres today. They’ve gone to midlevel contender to potential Western challenger.

    Reply
  148. TomL

    4 years ago

    Wait two SS prospects when we have the best in the game and they just (now effectively) wasted a first round selection on Ed Howard?!

    Anybody else feeling horrible for Yu? He comes off as just this genuine down to earth good person and chose not to exercise his opt-out close because of how much he liked the Cubs and was comfortable in the organization.

    1
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Not just down to earth, but fun. Rivals Trevor Bauer as the sharpest and wittiest social media presence in the game. Something you figured a media conscious club like the Cubs would be able to build on. Guess that’s all fading away, post Marquee deal. The Ricketts are turning into the McKaskeys

      2
      Reply
      • TomL

        4 years ago

        Yes very fun, in a different but complementary way than Rizzo and Javy. He had less of the baggage to an employer that Bauer carried too.

        I mean look at how Yu handled a potential twitter attack last year from a convicted(maybe?) Yelich. He was diplomatic but put him in his place and struck the jerk out in the field too.

        Besides all that he was literally a pitching machine you could almost program. Really really surprised the guy didn’t ever have a straight up knuckleball in the back pocket. Vic could’ve caught that too.

        I just do not get getting back MORE shortstops in return! Are they not in on Javy? Not sold on Howard anymore?

        Reply
    • drasco036

      4 years ago

      I also feel a little bad for Darvish but I think every baseball player knows it’s a business.

      As far as the two shortstops, perhaps you forgot that the Cubs had three of the best shortstop prospects in all of baseball at one time (Russell, Baez and Torres). Shortstops are always extremely valuable because they are athletic enough to play anywhere on the diamond and they have tremendous trade value.

      1
      Reply
  149. IronBallsMcGinty

    4 years ago

    Too bad they most likely won’t have a fan convention. That’d be an upbeat event.

    1
    Reply
    • Dumpster Divin Theo

      4 years ago

      Yeah, would love to hear the booing when they pitch the Marquee network this time.

      Reply
  150. jedimarcus22

    4 years ago

    I hope they go hard for Bauer.

    Reply
  151. Deleted_User

    4 years ago

    Why did the Cubs want Zach Davies? They clearly aren’t trying to contend in 2021 and he be a FA after 2021. They should be trading away rentals. Not trading for them.

    Reply
    • YourDreamGM

      4 years ago

      Just because you aren’t trying doesn’t mean you can’t contend in the central.

      Reply
    • Sky14

      4 years ago

      They could easily flip him. Flipping rentals is in part how they built their World Series roster.

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        @Sky14 Zach Davies is not a fix-and-flip candidate. He isn’t coming off a down year like Scott Feldman and Jason Hammel were when the Cubs signed them. The Cubs will actually get less than they gave up to get him because he’ll only have 2-3 months of control at the deadline rather than a full year.

        Reply
        • Herc33

          4 years ago

          I think he’s in the deal because SD needed to offset some salary and it was the way Chicago could get the most value in the trade.

          Its kind of weird because at $7-8M and with his production as a mid-rotation arm he’s not really a guy you “dump”, but I think this is a case of SD needing to free up money and the player being useful so the Cubs took him.

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @CNichols ABSOLUTELY DAVIES WAS NOT A SALARY OFFSET! IF HE WAS, HE WOULD HAVE BEEN NON-TENDERED! SALARY OFFSET GUYS ARE ONLY GUYS WITH UNDERWATER CONTRACTS THAT TEAMS CAN’T SIMPLY OPT OUT OF!

          I’m tired of people constantly referring to guys who are still in arb like Zach Davies and Tommy Pham as “salary offsets.” If the Padres needed to get of them to offset salary, they would have been non-tendered.

          Reply
    • Rsox

      4 years ago

      Because someone has to take the ball every 5th day contending or not.

      Darvish, Lester, Quintana, Chatworth is quite a lot of starting pitching to lose. Someone has to throw those innings

      Reply
      • Deleted_User

        4 years ago

        So call up their best starter from AAA. There was ZERO reason for them to waste valuable assets trading for a year of Zach Davies.

        Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          Amazing how convinced and then angry you are that Davies is here to stay. He could be traded tomorrow

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @Laughing@You

          They better trade him now. His trade value drops every day they don’t.

          Reply
        • UnknownPoster

          4 years ago

          That’s an even dumber assertion than the one you made above that you know without question the Cubs, not the Padres, 100% demanded Davies be included

          It’s quite easy to see the Padres saying:
          “No, the Cubs have to take Davies or else we won’t take 59 million of Darvish’s 62 million left. We don’t feel like taking the Time to move that money, we’d rather invest our time in fixing our bullpen. If you want Davies great! Or if not, there’s another Mlb caliber 3 starter who had a 2.73 era last year and a solid postseason. Go get yourself some more players.”

          With this other assertion, wtf!? He’s making 7M and had a 2.73 era. NO ONE on the pitching market with those numbers is signing for 7M. He’s a HUGE bargain, and therefore has significant trade value

          So they likely will wait till Bauer signs, for 35M a year, then go to the losers and say “you can give Tanaka 20M a year, or Davies for 7M and maybe you offer him a QO”

          You really think he has no value? Lmfao ok bud

          Reply
        • Deleted_User

          4 years ago

          @Laughing@You well we KNOW the Padres didn’t do that. Why would they say “Please take this good, cheap pitcher away from us. We don’t want him, even though he fills a need on our team.” The only reason the Padres would do that is if Zach Davies had an underwater contract which he doesn’t. Moving Zach Davies wouldn’t take any time. All they have to do is tell the other 29 teams “Davies is going on the block. Send in your final offers. You have 24 hours.” Then trade him to the highest bidder in 24 hours. That way at least get something for him. The Padres weren’t the ones who wanted Davies in the trade. The Cubs were. That much is obvious. What’s not obvious is why. He has no value to the Cubs because he’s a rental.

          And I never said Davies has no value. What I said was that his trade value goes down with each passing day, not up. Since the Cubs don’t gain in terms of contending by having him on the roster, that means they need to trade him NOW.

          Reply
  152. sergefunction

    4 years ago

    Do you think Yu is the Yu you knew in 2020?

    Do the Padres dare wish Darvish can swish ‘em at the dish?

    Baseball trade history oddities include multi-prospect packages for a major talent where within short orders one of the occasional prospects rises and elevates over the major talent..

    Sometimes injury or ineffectiveness is why. Zach Davies can excel in Chicago. Yu might or might not regress in 2021.. If he reproaches elite thate will surprise me more than if Yu backslides. Davies is not bad and I see double-digits in wins.

    Good for both teams. Obviously it wasn’t the retired Ron Fowler who was the Padre ownership leader going for broke.

    Reply
  153. ChiSoxCity

    4 years ago

    B-B-But, the Cubs can print money.

    1
    Reply
  154. msqboxer

    4 years ago

    2026 Cubs might make the playoffs.

    Reply
  155. 54scooterb

    4 years ago

    Yu never know, Darvish could get hurt learning how to surf.

    Reply
  156. drasco036

    4 years ago

    It’s hard not to have mixed emotions regarding this trade.

    The Cubs got some very high upside talent in return for Darvish but they didn’t get a single top 100 prospect where the Rays for Snell got Patino who is ML ready and a highly regarded prospect.

    Darvish has the edge on Snell in track record, recent success and peripherals. Plus the Cubs sent Caratini over. So in comparison the Cubs did worse than the Rays.

    What the Cubs did get however are 4 very high upside prospects. Santana looks like a guy who can climb up the ranking rapidly and with Percidado. Mena sounds very intriguing with his speed and opposite field approach… I cannot get mad with what the Cubs got in return here. I would give them a B as a grade due to upside vs. the bust potential.

    Reply
  157. ACK

    4 years ago

    Yahoo Japan is reporting that Darvish tweeted he hasn’t made up his mind yet. He may have a no trade clause to waive in order to go to SD.

    Reply
    • Jake1972

      4 years ago

      Darvish would be wise to head to California and play for the Friars because the park is more suitable for him at his age…

      Reply
    • Herc33

      4 years ago

      I think he only has a list of 12 teams that he can block trades to and I’m pretty sure SD wasn’t on his NTC list, so the Cubs can trade him to SD whether he wants to go or not.

      Reply
  158. Backup Catcher to the Backup Catcher

    4 years ago

    Cubs are still gonna draw 2.5 to 3.0 million fans. Rickets will make his cheese. I guess Bryant is the next guy to go. Pretty soon, Cubbies will be rivaling the Bucs for last place in the NL Central.

    With all the dumping in this division, you’d think one team would step up and try to improve. This will be an easy division to win for someone. I’m most disappointed in the Reds looking to dump, as well.

    Reply
  159. Goose

    4 years ago

    The Padres may have one of the best 1 – 4 in a rotation in a long time. Barring injuries or Covid this team should in the world series.

    The Cubs are dumping payroll. It was a good reload deal. Davies is an underrated pitcher. I could see them flipping him for a couple of more decent prospects if it is a true rebuild. Now it is a question of how far they go. Will anyone give them anything for Bryant or do they need him to rebuild value?

    It is amazing that Gore didn’t go in either deal, especially for Snell. The Padres picked up some big pieces and retained the cream of their farm.

    Reply
    • j_butte

      4 years ago

      Darvish had a nice bounce back year and Snell has been mostly good but I don’t love the Padres rotation. They still have some question marks. Lamet is very young, Paddack regressed a bit last year, and Gore hasnt even made his debut yet. These moves could go sideways for the Padres quickly if Darvish struggles early and Snell doesn’t get back to 2018 form.

      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Things could go awry sure, all teams can say that. Look what happens to the Yanks lately with injuries?

        Lamet will be 28 in 2021. By comparison Snell is age 28.

        Re: Darvish bounce-back; Bauer bounced back from 6+ ERA in 2019, has a 9 season ERA of 4 and yet teams are lining up to sign him.

        Reply
        • j_butte

          4 years ago

          Young might’ve been the wrong word. Inexperienced is probably appropriate I guess. I like Darvish in that park but losing Davies is significant. He was good last year. I’d still put the Padres staff top to bottom below the Dodgers. Pretty close between them and the Braves depending on Soroka’s availability and how Anderson does in year two.

          Reply
  160. Jake1972

    4 years ago

    Many are knocking this trade but the Cubs got a Starter to replace Darvish in the rotation and obtained four prospects that can play the infield and outfield.

    If the Cubs fall out of contention then they could trade the pitcher and obtain another prospect or two at the trade deadline.

    Yes this was a Salary dump but it did not hurt the Cubs as much as some are claiming.

    Next move is to trade Baez and Bryant and if they must and get a good haul then trade Wilson C. and retool the team for 2023 and beyond.

    I give the Cubs a B+ on this trade because the prospects look solid…

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      Thank you for some sanity. IMHO, there have been more crazy comments on this article than I have ever seen in MLB-R.

      1-For the Cubs fans that think the Cubs just forfeited the division, no, they are still the favorites. The drop-off from Darvish to Davies is not as steep as some think.

      2-For the Darvish bashers, who always mention the 1st half of 2019, he was hurt. Since he recovered, he’s been really good.

      3-For the misguided Cubs fans, who thought they were getting a top-tier prospect back, he’s good, but the value isn’t there. You have to think of it in terms of excess value. If Darvish was a FA, what kind of FA contract would he land? Think of Bauer, and then add 4 years of age, and some injury background. The ceiling, imo, is maybe $75M/3. At most, you are looking at $16M of excess value.

      4-For the Cubs fans, and the Cubs haters, who insist that the prospects they received are no good, because they never heard of them, or because they aren’t in the Padres top-4, it doesn’t work that way.

      Just for context, you can look at the FG prospect assessment. Last year, the SDP had 14 guys with a value of 45 or higher, while the RS had 6. That means that trading for the Padres #14 was the equivalent of trading for the RS #4.

      And the younger guys are rarely ranked. One was a 2020 draft choice. One of the internationals had a $1M+ bonus, and another had a $2M+ bonus. They are all real prospects, even if you never heard of them.

      1
      Reply
      • ChiSoxCity

        4 years ago

        YOU ARE HIGHLY DELUSIONAL.

        Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          YOU ARE HIGHLY DELUSIONAL.
          —————————————
          And yet, you chose to not dispute a single point I made. Let me know if you ever want to actually debate the finer points of baseball.

          Otherwise, it is back to the basement with you.

          Reply
        • wordonthestreet

          4 years ago

          Joe I guess you sent ChiSoxCity fleeing back to his basement! Lol

          Reply
        • JoeBrady

          4 years ago

          It was more like a timeout. I think he grew tired from watching the adults talk real baseball.

          Reply
  161. cubs2016champs

    4 years ago

    Yup my Cubbos have threw in the towel. Hello 106 more years of rebuilding.

    Reply
    • hyraxwithaflamethrower

      4 years ago

      I wouldn’t have minded if they’d gotten Morejon+. Yu is getting older and is expensive. To not have gotten a single prospect among their top 10 is a joke. For better or worse, though, I don’t see them doing a fullscale rebuild, just because the NL Central is so weak. The Cubs can afford to lose Darvish and still probably win the division, then they fool themselves into believing they have a legitimate shot at the WS. Until another team forces them to rebuild in order to get further, I don’t see it happening.

      Reply
      • libertyfighter

        4 years ago

        The Padres still have 3 very good to elite lefties on MLB’s door step, one of the top rated catching prospects on MLB’s door step, a soon to be MLB top ten prospect in Abrams and a young outfielder in Hassell who some considered the best pure hitter in the 2020 draft. Preller has proven that he knows how to build a farm system via the International player route and will add 4-5 very good international players the next two years. The Cubs got two very good, but young prospects in this trade and were able to shed $55 million in payroll. The Cubs were not going to compete for a World Series with their core, this is the right move. The Cubs should trade off the rest of their valuable players and stuff their farm system like the cross town Chisox did.

        1
        Reply
  162. jonscriff

    4 years ago

    Padres are gonna be deadly in 2022 with Clevy back

    4
    Reply
  163. rsoxbob

    4 years ago

    It’s the Padres’ world. The rest of us are just living in it.

    1
    Reply
  164. SCHWING and A Miss

    4 years ago

    Jed, you got boned AF!

    Reply
  165. Slapshot53

    4 years ago

    Prospects , wow , several may never make it anyway, as the world is full of should have but didn’t. The cubs at least received a pitcher back, and I feel other players should be dealt before this move was done , so I do not like it.

    Reply
  166. Peart of the game

    4 years ago

    Looks like the Padres have their best rotation in franchise history right now.

    1
    Reply
    • Rsox

      4 years ago

      That 1998 rotation was pretty good. Only down spot really was that they needed 24 starts from Mark Langston and Pete Smith

      Reply
      • Brew’88

        4 years ago

        Kevin Brown and a bunch of waifs

        Reply
  167. Tom1968

    4 years ago

    Are yu kidding me?

    Reply
  168. dmarcus15

    4 years ago

    Again baseball becoming the haves and have nots. Chicago doing the dump for draft slots.

    Reply
  169. papanialarry@yahoo,com

    4 years ago

    Man, the cubs are dumping salary faster than the reds. Both teams look like they’ll be fighting with the pirates for the bottom of the devision.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      cubs are dumping salary faster
      —————————————-
      They moved one salary and took back one smaller salary. That doesn’t even move the needle.

      Reply
      • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

        4 years ago

        They have at least 90mil after that trade to play with. Its now time to sign rizzo and baez to extensions sign an odorizzi or archie Bradley. Get a LF.. now they need a catcher. Contreras can play all 162.

        Reply
  170. jorge78

    4 years ago

    Over 648 comments!
    Is this a record?

    Reply
    • hyraxwithaflamethrower

      4 years ago

      I doubt it, but it is the highest I remember seeing, certainly in a while.

      Reply
  171. Pete'sView

    4 years ago

    As a Giants fan, my hat’s off to the Padres. This is a remarkable offseason by anybody’s standards. When you are close and you have the resources, a team has to go all in. Of course, I will continue to root for the Giants, but I’ll be rooting for San Diego too—to crush the Dodgers.

    4
    Reply
  172. SwingtheFNbat

    4 years ago

    The Cubs were wise to unload Darvish. It was not to long ago when Yu’s value was so terrible, that the Cubs couldn’t pay enough to trade the guy.

    2
    Reply
  173. hyraxwithaflamethrower

    4 years ago

    Ok, so you all know those ridiculous proposals thrown out by homers, often Yankee fans. Propsals like “Sanchez and Andujar for Lindor and Carrasco.” Our garbage for your star! How can you say no? This trade, right here, is the kind of thing that fuels these delusional hopes. Cubs didn’t get a single top-1o prospect from the SD farm? Seriously?

    Reply
    • ChiSoxCity

      4 years ago

      The Cubbies gonna Cub… it’s what they do.

      Reply
    • UnknownPoster

      4 years ago

      How TF does a package of 17-20 year olds + a solid #3 mean your washed out 27 year old rejects from their own team have trade value? What an idiotic comparison

      2
      Reply
  174. jessaumodesto

    4 years ago

    As a Cubbie fan I say thank god!

    1
    Reply
  175. jd396

    4 years ago

    AJ “Force Trade” Preller

    1
    Reply
  176. onegame

    4 years ago

    That is a really weak return in the present. Hoping for even one of those wild cards to come through seems like the strategy of an also ran team not the defending division champ. What was the big rush to get him traded? Seems like Sox trading Quintana to the Cubs brought together better prospects than these guys. Again, maybe they all become Tatis, Jr. as a wild card that comes through. That’s a big gamble for a big market successful team. They acquired zero pitching prospects and a regular that is a free agent after the year that is not known for his stuff. Truly a bizarre return.

    Reply
    • Rsox

      4 years ago

      While its a stark drop off after Bauer, the longer they waited the less teams may have had interest. Maybe this is why Theo left a year earlier than was originally planned, he didn’t have it in him to blow it up. Who knows?

      Reply
    • ChiTown4BetterorWorse

      4 years ago

      You can’t compare the Quintana return to the Darvish return. Few teams are willing to take on salary and fewer teams are willing to give up prospects than was the case in the past. Darvish also had an 11 team no-trade clause so it limited the number of teams the Cubs could shop him to. Quintana did not have any no trade clause. Quintana was also on one of the most reasonable contracts in baseball (or so it seemed at the time) whereas Darvish’s contract was a slight bargain but still a risk given his age and injury history.

      Yes, the haul was very light but comparing the two returns is apples to oranges.

      Reply
  177. mattcubs

    4 years ago

    Interesting haul. If the Cubs were desiring contention, you’d have expected a few major league ready pieces–seems like they’re content to retool and remain somewhat competitive.

    Makes sense to unload Darvish, and Caratini was surplus. Why not just flip Davies at this point? He was stellar last year and is very cheap this year. Based on his performance, age, and contract (albeit only 1 year left), he should net a top 150-200 prospect. Or, sign him to an extension right away. He won’t command a ton of money and has been solid throughout his career.

    Reply
  178. LaFlamaBlanca

    4 years ago

    Hedges
    Naylor
    Quantrill
    Patino
    Trammell
    Mejia
    Zach Davies
    Reginald Preciado
    Yeison Santana
    Owen Caissie
    Ismael Mena
    Blake Hunt
    Cole Wilcox
    Gabriel Arias
    Joey Cantillo
    Owen Miller
    Ty France
    Luis Torrens
    Andres Munoz
    Gerardo Reyes
    Hudson Potts
    Jeisson Rosario
    Edward Olivares

    These are the 23 guys the Padres gave up in trades in the last year (might be missing a few). For as hyped as this team has become I don’t see how they will overcome depleting their farm system soo much. Once Gore is promoted that farm will probably rank near the bottom of all major league clubs. Darvish is 35 and has yet to prove something throughout a full season, Snell can’t get out of the 5th inning & will be at 100 pitches by then and be lifted for a pinch hitter, Lamet is hurt, Clevinger is hurt, Austin Nola is average, Cronenworth is overated, Grisham has yet to prove anything, Myers was atrocious until last year’s 60 GMs will he show up in 21? That bullpen was cheeks last year and Kirby Yates is no more. How exactly are these guys going to compete for a World Series ring exactly??? They aren’t even better than the White Sox’s and their moves last year. I predict a 3rd place finish in a full season, and Preller selling off multiple pieces in a few years when they realize they just aren’t good enough. Injuries, lack of depth, crappy farm, and overated players is what I see in the Padres. Machado and Tatis are the only locks on that squad. Paddack, Snell, and Lamet are intriguing pieces but they all have question marks Lamet hasn’t been healthy, Snell needs to go deeper into games and might not get that chance I’m the NL, and Paddack needs more time to develop maybe some more time in the minors might help to work on his 3rd pitch.

    2
    Reply
    • Drew4578545

      4 years ago

      Thank you. Darvish and Snell are good pitchers. They aren’t Verlander/Scherzer/Kershaw. Jamie Shields comes to mind

      Reply
    • Brew’88

      4 years ago

      Funny stuff, and you forgot a few. There are perhaps 4 or 5 guys on that list that are or will become quality MLers and after all the deals the Pads farm system remains top 5 in baseball, it’s that deep. 6 players still in Top 100.

      1
      Reply
  179. DarkSide830

    4 years ago

    Preller just stole 5 mil.

    1
    Reply
    • PhilliesRBad

      4 years ago

      5 mil. About how much your Phillies bullpen is worth.

      Reply
    • PhilliesRBad

      4 years ago

      Next five years, the Cubs will have more winning seasons than the Phillies. Your long rebuild is inevitable, meanwhile the Cubs will do a quick rebuild of the roster and will still make the postseason next year.

      Reply
    • lebowskiachiever

      4 years ago

      Actually, Darvish is owed $62 million, not $59 million as his second place Cy Young finish triggered a $1 million elevator for each of the next three years. So, the Padres will be paying $57 million, not $54 million.

      Reply
    • iml12

      4 years ago

      5 million was approximately the signing bonuses of all the prospects. In the grand scheme of things it’s insignificant.

      Reply
  180. jk

    4 years ago

    off topic,,,, but what happened with Jeff Todd?

    1
    Reply
    • ABCD

      4 years ago

      He bought a camping gear business in Roanoke, VA. He still writes part-time on Wednesday night. Did you know that kyleschwarbersmom was born in a Jeff Todd chat?

      Reply
  181. BeeVeeTee

    4 years ago

    Oh boy, it looks Theo Epstein jumped got off this ship before it started to sink! Epstein dismantled the Cubs’ farm system with trades where it may take five years to even discuss the Cubs in any discussion as being a team on the rise. Bryant and Baez lost their values for any significant pieces for a run in a three years.

    Reply
    • Logjammer D"Baggagecling

      4 years ago

      Baez is a top 10 SS. He has plenty of value. Except you extend him not trade him.

      Reply
  182. hoof hearted

    4 years ago

    Cubs sign Springer; 5/100
    Hey, they just freed up $20M. What do you do with $20 big ones?

    Reply
    • diehardcubbie

      4 years ago

      Not quite. Darvish saved them 22 mil and Caratini 1.4 mil. For a combined 23.4 mil. The Cubs will essentially pay 1 mil a year of Darvish’s contract for the remainder of his deal. So now the Cubs have shed 22.4 this year once you add that 1 mil in for Darvish.

      Then you have to take into consideration the money they will have to pay Davies who will earn 8.5 mil this year. So all-in-all the Cubs end up shedding 13.9 mil from their books.

      Total this season the Cubs have shed somewhere in the ball park of 55 mil with shed not picking up Lester’s 25 mil option (had to pay 10 mil buyout), 23 mil fell off the books with Chatwood and Quintana, lost a project 10 mil more by non-tendering Schwarber, Almora, Tapera, and Martinez. There are some other salary cuts but those are the major ones. There is no reason why this team having saved 55 mil this year couldn’t give out a few major league deals. Even if they spent 20 mil they still will have saved 35 mil this season

      The team will also be losing about 84 mil next year in payrolls with potential free agents Baez, Rizzo, Bryant, Winkler, and Kimbrel (if they decline the Club Option after this season). Now with arbitration for other players going up you would have to imagine they would have to use somewhere in the ball park 10 mil for additional expenses to those players. So in theory the Cubs could have 125 mil to freed up in the next two off season. How they can’t lock up 2 or 3 of the core position players long term is beyond me.

      Reply
  183. marooned in NE

    4 years ago

    So where are all the AJ haters that haunt to this site? Back on the couch hub.

    Reply
  184. marooned in NE

    4 years ago

    Hey AJ hater where are you?

    Reply
  185. nreeves1268

    4 years ago

    Lawdhammercy, this is the slowest-developing trade EVAH!

    Reply
  186. T8Rcheese1

    4 years ago

    Good luck to Yu and Vic in San Diego. Davies is solid and the Cubs should still compete for the Central. It’s unclear exactly yet what direction the are heading in but ths could be that they are threading the needle, so to speak like the have stated. We shall see what kind of baseball man Jed can be at the top now. He is being challenged for sure to put out a competitive club, better the farm system, and cut payroll. As a Cubs fan I hope the Owner aren’t going to completely throw in the towel. They should recover soon and have Deeeep pockets. Look I’m a Cubs fan and will certainly not act like I’m not thankful for the years since new ownership took over. It’s been a pretty good ride so far, since 2015 I’d so most any teams fans would sign up for the success they have had.

    Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      Thank you for this. I like it when rational fans can appreciate their own success. If you listen to some RS fans, Henry is the epitome of evil for not winning a WS every year.

      IRT the Cubs, I don’t think they are throwing in the towel. My guess is that they recognize that they are the best team in the division, even if they swap out Darvish for Davies. But not competitive for the WS, outside of ‘anything can happen’.

      So they are threading the needle a little, by continuing to be good, but cutting the time required for the inevitable rebuild.

      Reply
  187. ChiSoxCity

    4 years ago

    So, how long before the entire coaching staff gets fired? 2022? 2023?

    Reply
  188. dschap02

    4 years ago

    Love to see “small market” teams go after the big guys. This should be a fun team to watch, I hope they poop on LA.

    1
    Reply
  189. MadSkillsUniversity

    4 years ago

    Yu is a great pitcher who needs to grow up and get off Social Media. That said, SD is the team to beat now. LOL Great moves by that organization. I think this Cubs should have gotten more, but whenever Theo is involved in bringing in big names, he ALWYAS over pays and extends – that’s how he wins. When he leaves…well, look at Boston and the Cubs right now.

    Reply
    • MadSkillsUniversity

      4 years ago

      You is better than Snell, and look what the Rays got for him compared to what the Cubs could MUSTER for Yu. The Cubs seem to make bad trades at times.

      Reply
      • paindonthurt

        4 years ago

        Yu is better than Snell? How do you make that comment? Age, innings, contract, injury history, are all considered in better.

        1
        Reply
      • wordonthestreet

        4 years ago

        @ChitownSox2022

        Yu is not better than Snell and Snell is 6 years younger (and in his prime) a coveted lefty and also around $40 million cheaper.

        So Snells contract which is what is traded is worth more in trade.

        That is how it works. Your welcome.

        Reply
    • Twinsfan333

      4 years ago

      Needs to grow up and get off social media? Sounds you should take your own advice.

      Reply
  190. johnnynoze

    4 years ago

    Lol I just saw that the Cubs are only covering $3MM of Darvish’s contract and I immediately recognized that the quants in San Diego are idiots. Nice try tho!

    Reply
    • mrpadre19

      4 years ago

      Plus the $8 mil for Davies of course.

      1
      Reply
    • JoeBrady

      4 years ago

      This is likely meaningless. My guess is that the $3M was derived by the fact that Darvish was owed an extra $3M because he finished 2nd in the C.Y. voting, and SD figured that, since the Cubs got the benefit of the performance, they should pick up the cost.

      Nothing mysterious here.

      1
      Reply
      • wordonthestreet

        4 years ago

        Oh Joe you figured it out? Well since the article clearly stated the $3million was for the incentives there really was no mystery. Yea I read the post.

        Reply
  191. okiguess

    4 years ago

    Caratini: 2 oz Vodka, 1 oz carrot juice.

    2
    Reply
  192. giannisandyelich123

    4 years ago

    So the Cubs get two good prospects and an era champ contender for a backup catcher and one of the worst contracts in the last decade? Anyone thinking this is a bad trade for the Cubs are high lol

    Reply
  193. joefriday1948

    4 years ago

    The Padres show the ineptitude of the Rockies and why fans can only hope the team relocates to Tijuana Mexico and the city can get an expansion club

    Reply
« Older Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Please login to leave a reply.

Log in Register

ad: 300x250_1_MLB

    Top Stories

    Braves Designate Craig Kimbrel For Assignment

    Corbin Burnes To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Braves Select Craig Kimbrel

    Jerry Reinsdorf, Justin Ishbia Reach Agreement For Ishbia To Obtain Future Majority Stake In White Sox

    White Sox To Promote Kyle Teel

    Sign Up For Trade Rumors Front Office Now And Lock In Savings!

    Pablo Lopez To Miss Multiple Months With Teres Major Strain

    MLB To Propose Automatic Ball-Strike Challenge System For 2026

    Giants Designate LaMonte Wade Jr., Sign Dominic Smith

    Reds Sign Wade Miley, Place Hunter Greene On Injured List

    Padres Interested In Jarren Duran

    Royals Promote Jac Caglianone

    Mariners Promote Cole Young, Activate Bryce Miller

    2025-26 MLB Free Agent Power Rankings: May Edition

    Evan Phillips To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    AJ Smith-Shawver Diagnosed With Torn UCL

    Reds Trade Alexis Díaz To Dodgers

    Rockies Sign Orlando Arcia

    Ronel Blanco To Undergo Tommy John Surgery

    Joc Pederson Suffers Right Hand Fracture

    Recent

    Orioles Designate Matt Bowman For Assignment

    Diamondbacks Select Kyle Backhus, Designate Aramis Garcia

    Athletics Acquire Austin Wynns

    Julio Rodriguez Helped Off Field Following Apparent Injury

    Astros Designate Forrest Whitley For Assignment

    Twins Place Zebby Matthews On 15-Day IL, Reinstate Danny Coulombe

    Rays Promote Ian Seymour

    Angels Notes: Soler, Trout, Stephenson

    Mets Sign Julian Merryweather To Minor League Deal

    Brian Snitker Discusses Raisel Iglesias, Closer Role

    ad: 300x250_5_side_mlb

    MLBTR Newsletter - Hot stove highlights in your inbox, five days a week

    Latest Rumors & News

    Latest Rumors & News

    • 2024-25 Top 50 MLB Free Agents With Predictions
    • Nolan Arenado Rumors
    • Dylan Cease Rumors
    • Luis Robert Rumors
    • Marcus Stroman Rumors

     

    Trade Rumors App for iOS and Android

    MLBTR Features

    MLBTR Features

    • Remove Ads, Support Our Writers
    • Front Office Originals
    • Front Office Fantasy Baseball
    • MLBTR Podcast
    • 2024-25 Offseason Outlook Series
    • 2025 Arbitration Projections
    • 2024-25 MLB Free Agent List
    • 2025-26 MLB Free Agent List
    • Contract Tracker
    • Transaction Tracker
    • Extension Tracker
    • Agency Database
    • MLBTR On Twitter
    • MLBTR On Facebook
    • Team Facebook Pages
    • How To Set Up Notifications For Breaking News
    • Hoops Rumors
    • Pro Football Rumors
    • Pro Hockey Rumors

    Rumors By Team

    • Angels Rumors
    • Astros Rumors
    • Athletics Rumors
    • Blue Jays Rumors
    • Braves Rumors
    • Brewers Rumors
    • Cardinals Rumors
    • Cubs Rumors
    • Diamondbacks Rumors
    • Dodgers Rumors
    • Giants Rumors
    • Guardians Rumors
    • Mariners Rumors
    • Marlins Rumors
    • Mets Rumors
    • Nationals Rumors
    • Orioles Rumors
    • Padres Rumors
    • Phillies Rumors
    • Pirates Rumors
    • Rangers Rumors
    • Rays Rumors
    • Red Sox Rumors
    • Reds Rumors
    • Rockies Rumors
    • Royals Rumors
    • Tigers Rumors
    • Twins Rumors
    • White Sox Rumors
    • Yankees Rumors

    ad: 160x600_MLB

    Navigation

    • Sitemap
    • Archives
    • RSS/Twitter Feeds By Team

    MLBTR INFO

    • Advertise
    • About
    • Commenting Policy
    • Privacy Policy

    Connect

    • Contact Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS Feed

    MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com

    hide arrows scroll to top

    Register

    Desktop Version | Switch To Mobile Version