The Diamondbacks enter the season with an approximate payroll of $168MM (per RosterResource), shattering their prior franchise record of about $131MM. And while Arizona is among the many clubs to have been impacted by the recent bankruptcy filing of Diamond Sports Group, it doesn’t sound like concerns regarding the television outlook will prevent the club from adding further, if needed. Managing partner Ken Kendrick tells Theo Mackie of the Arizona Republic that he’s “absolutely” willing to green-light further expenditures if needs arise prior to the summer trade deadline.
From a luxury tax standpoint, Arizona sits at a projected $216MM — about $21MM shy of the first-tier threshold. They shouldn’t have many, if any, limitations with regard to the competitive balance tax, as it’s quite rare for any team to take on that much prorated annual value at the deadline. Kendrick pointed to his team’s 2017 acquisition of J.D. Martinez as a prior example of an aggressive deadline approach and said he’ll be “prepared to do that yet again” if the right player is available this July.
Kendrick didn’t delve into this aspect of deadline shopping, but Arizona’s payroll is also well-positioned from a long-term standpoint. The Diamondbacks shouldn’t have an issues adding a player who is signed or arb-eligible beyond the current season. In fact, it could be argued they’d be wise to target such players, given the slate of high-profile free agents the D-backs have at season’s end. First baseman Christian Walker, closer Paul Sewald and left-hander Jordan Montgomery are all slated to hit free agency. Designated hitter Joc Pederson has a mutual option, as do reliever Scott McGough and outfielder Randal Grichuk. Mutual options are almost never exercised, so they’ll all likely hit the market, too.
That large slate of names coming off the books leaves the Diamondbacks with just $63.5MM on next year’s books, per RosterResource. That’ll jump when Kelly’s $7MM club option is picked up and when Gallen receives a hefty raise on this year’s $10.011MM salary in arbitration. But the rest of the D-backs’ arb class consists of middle relievers and first-time eligible players, meaning it shouldn’t be overly expensive. Ryan Thompson, Kevin Ginkel, Joe Mantiply, Ryne Nelson, Geraldo Perdomo and Alek Thomas make up the rest of the class. Given this year’s new highwater mark and the comparatively minimal commitments on the docket in 2025, the Diamondbacks could add a player on a notable contract.
When we’re this far from the deadline, there’s no telling what exactly the Diamondbacks will be targeting — outside of bullpen help. That’s not a knock on Arizona’s relief corps, but rather just an observation that virtually every contending club shops around to deepen its bullpen at the deadline. The D-backs’ lineup is quite deep and largely set with established players. In the rotation, lefty Eduardo Rodriguez is expected to miss about a month with a lat strain and the aforementioned Montgomery is ramping up down in the minors. Once they’re both active, they’ll join Zac Gallen, Merrill Kelly and Brandon Pfaadt in what should be one of the most talented rotations in the game.
Injuries can quickly change that calculus and necessitate short-term acquisitions. Kendrick’s comments suggest he’ll be willing to be flexible in allowing GM Mike Hazen and his staff when they look to fortify a roster that hopes for another deep postseason run.
Fenway 1
A mid market team willing to spend to win! A miracle! Cough cough Minnesota
brodie-bruce
@fenway 1
not an dbacks fan but i do like that they have a competitive owner willing to eat profit for a ring, if we had more owners willing to spend to keep there team’s competitive it will improve the overall quality of the game.
Fever Pitch Guy
brodie – Well said!!!
And I find it kinda ironic Fenway called out the low-revenue Twins, but failed to mention his own team …. ya know, the one with the 3rd-highest revenue in MLB but currently sitting 14th in CBT payroll.
Fever Pitch Guy
Woops …. Forbes just came out with 2023 revenue.
Not surprisingly, the Red Sox dropped down to 4th-highest revenue because of a $13M decrease.
Too bad we have to wait a year to see how much their revenue drops in 2024!
TAKERDBACKS
As a diehard dbacks fan, I said this all along. Fans need to come to the game and we will spend! You can expect a team to spend when you show up half the time. It goes both ways. I am a diehard dbacks fan since the start from NYC. Maybe the biggest out there. I speak on my channel about them daily. Love the passion by ownership
desertdawg
I also think there is another ulterior motive, the DBacks want Maricopa County to help pick up the tab for upgrades and repairs to Chase field, also been talk of the lease expiring in 2027, They have had discussions with the County for a couple years with no progress on the County side. Maybe this is a ploy to make the County to come around, showing that the ownership does want to stay at Chase Field, if County drags their feet, gives the DBacks an opportunity to check what is on the outside of Phoenix as a home for 2028.
Lofton4daHOF
I agree with the sentiment, but Phoenix is now the 5th largest city in the US. They should be behaving like a large market team.
This one belongs to the Reds
I am sure it also had a lot to do with the extra income from the World Series run last year.
Fever Pitch Guy
Lofton – Spending should and normally aligns with revenue.
Arizona has the 9th-lowest revenue in MLB, they are not a large market team by any stretch.
Lofton4daHOF
Valid point. Maybe I’m a bit of a grammar nazi, but I guess small/large -revenue teams would be a better term. I view the term “market” as potential customers.
Tigers3232
@Lofton Metro Phoenix area ranks 10th and they have 11th largest media market. With NYC and CHI having 2 teams each, this puts Phoenix right about in the middle. So they re a mid market team.
Lofton4daHOF
Again, fair point. But three cities ahead of them have two teams, splitting the market. They have no interstate competition. Even if they are tenth, that is still top third. That is still 5 million people in the immediate area, and 11 million in the state as a “market”. The revenue argument is fair, but a a Phoenix resident, I can tell you there are plenty of people here to generate revenue. There is finally a “generation” of AZ residents that grew up with the Dbacks.. My point is that they are spending as they should.
Tigers3232
Anyone who lives in an are there is an MLB team can say there are plenty of people. When we are speaking about the population of largest metro areas they re incomprehensible #s. And a split NYC and CHI is still a larger market than PHX. So again they are not a top 10 MLB team. And being in the same state does not equate to being in the same media market.
As far as the revenue argument, it is more than fair it is reality. Revenue dictates budgets and spending. Size of media markets is also directly tied into revenue. So yet again that makes Phoenix a mid market team. This is not an opinion of mine this is a statistical fact backed by #s.
Lofton4daHOF
Again, I will agree that PHX is not as large as NY/CHI/LA. So I assume that is your definition of large market/ big revenue teams.
But I don’t think it’s fair to assume all teams have identical business models, nor is it fair to use solely quantitative statistics (population) to measure a qualitative concept (fandom). Owners have different motivations. Cities have ebbs and flows. My statement was simply that the dbacks owner is spending appropriately.
Tigers3232
There’s no need to get into quantitative statistics, demographic studies, etc.. PHX falls in at 13 for market size. There are 30 teams if the top you want to split it in 3rds to determine what’s large market which is a very liberal determination, that would be the top 10. 13 would fall into the middle 10(mid market). And then 21-30 would be small market.
That’s a very loose but easy way to determine, but probably to favorable for some of those in top 10. Even with the favorable break down PHX falls in the middle, so calling them a mid market team is a very fair assessment. I wouldn’t say it’s extreme to expect what’s deemed a big market team to be in at least the top 10 of biggest markets, would you??
Will Dbax
What you are forgetting is the Phoenix market is largely made up of transplants from either California or one of the places in the northern region that get a ton of snow. You are just as likely to find lifelong Dodger, Cub, or Met fans as you are to find Dback fans here.
JoeBrady
Great to feel the love for the owner who lost 110 games as recently as 2021.
FWIW, most of the owners are similar. Big market owners can afford to out-run their mistakes.
Everyone else cycles between contention and non-contention. When you hit on a few picks, you’re a great owner. When you miss a few, you’re cheap.
Fever Pitch Guy
Joe – There is no reason why Top 5 Revenue teams can’t make the 12-team postseason basically every year. I’ve already listed several teams that have made the postseason almost every season over the past 30 or so years.
If they don’t, they are either very cheap or very injury-plagued or very dumb.
whyhayzee
If that was true, baseball would suck. Seven spots for the other 25 teams versus 12 spots for 30 teams? There’s a big difference between a 28% chance and a 40% chance. No, baseball is best when the big spenders fall on their duffs on a regular basis. It’s very entertaining.
Fever Pitch Guy
hayzee – I never said I WANTED the Top 5 Revenue teams to make the postseason. I take pleasure in the biggest spenders missing the playoffs because of dumb decisions.
You can probably guess who had the biggest losses last year.
Mets lost $292M.
Padres lost $116M.
Both well deserved.
whyhayzee
Ok, sorry for the misunderstanding.
whyhayzee
I do believe that baseball could do a better job of balancing revenue. Certain teams have a fundamental advantage due to their location as well as evolution. For example, New York once supported 3 franchises, Boston had 2. So each has improved their ability to find fans for their 3 teams versus 5. Meanwhile, Chicago has eternally remained at 2 teams. I don’t have an easy solution, but there could be one.
Fever Pitch Guy
hayzee – No worries, I know it’s not often we agree ;O)
Fever Pitch Guy
hayzee – Yes absolutely some franchise are at a big advantage because of their market. Not only do the Red Sox own most of New England, they’ve picked up a ton of baseball fans in Eastern Canada since the Expos left.
I just don’t see an equitable way to take that advantage from NY and LA teams, not without a max and min salary requirement which will never happen in MLB.
Blackpink in the area
This is the ownership group every team wishes they had. I think the Diamondbacks had the best offseason of any team in baseball. The team overachieved last year and now they are spending to support them. Good for Diamondbacks fans.
ssowl
Not really. He just threatened the city of Phoenix with relocation if he doesn’t get a new ballpark. Not really that great if you ask me
Spencer O'Gara
You should watch the full press conference and Q&A section. He did no such thing. PHNX and other clickbaity “journalists” ran with that headline which highly misrepresented both his actual words and larger meaning. They were so incorrect that most places that ran with that headline have since changed or deleted them.
NYCityRiddler
Who asked you? Ahahaha!
Fever Pitch Guy
Black – Well said, that franchise has a great owner and Mr. Hazen is superb.
RandorBierd
Sure but what does Howie Kendrick have to say about it?
Ducey
Maybe spring for some new uniforms. God are those ugly.
hiflew
The season just started. Why are we already talking about the trade deadline? At least wait until mid-May or so.
YankeesBleacherCreature
Pumping up the fanbase.
hiflew
If the fanbase isn’t already pumped up by the start of the season, they probably aren’t the fans you should be worrying about because they do not really care about baseball.
Spencer O'Gara
Because he’s been notoriously cheap in his tenure owning the team. He is letting fans know that he’s prepared to continue if they continue to show up. It would represent a break from the norm for both sides: he usually doesn’t spend and fans usually don’t show up and then complain when LAD comes to town and its a sea of blue instead of red/purple.
its_happening
Sell tickets, put more eyes on the TV, generate a buzz on-top of their playoff performance last year. Like Yankee said, pump up the fanbase and generate new fans.
goob
People are divided about Mantiply.
whyhayzee
There’s a remainder who aren’t.
Mikenmn
There’s at least the possibility of Montgomery pitching enough to vest his 2025 option but either having mediocre performance or an injury to make him consider exercising it?
YankeesBleacherCreature
Even if his performance implodes, he can opt-out and most likely secure a higher guarantee if he’s healthy.
VegasSDfan
The Dbacks are going for it this year.
seth3120
As a Cardinals fan I’m really disappointed how the starting pitching market unfolded. On short term deals we could have had Snell, Montgomery, or maybe both if they were willing to expand payroll one season. I know their original asking prices turned out to be way out of line but guys like Lynn and Gibson weren’t guys you had to jump on right away there would always be comparable players throughout free agency. In a weak division we could have taken advantage but we addressed our biggest need with a comparable staff to last year.
MLBTR needs to hire editors
There should never be a comma before “too.”