The Mets’ offseason has seen a bevy of major names both coming and going off the roster, and the New York Post’s Joel Sherman provides a nice breakdown of both the team’s moves and some of the behind-the-scenes plans (or backup plans) that went into these transactions. Sherman’s piece also details some free agent and trade candidates who hadn’t been previously cited as Mets targets, including Ranger Suarez, Ryan Weathers, Johan Oviedo, and Pirates hurlers Bubba Chandler and Braxton Ashcraft.
New York’s trade for Freddy Peralta earlier this week helped the Mets finally secure the frontline rotation help they’d been seeking all winter, which helped because many of the other pitchers the team was exploring had already changed teams. The Yankees acquired Weathers from the Marlins two weeks ago, the Red Sox landed Oviedo from the Pirates in early December, and Suarez signed with the Red Sox last week as well on a five-year, $130MM contract.
That type of long-term deal for a pitcher was thought to be outside of the Mets’ comfort zone, as multiple reports indicated that the team preferred shorter-term arrangements when trying to find rotation help. The same was largely true of the Mets’ position-player pursuits, as the team offered Kyle Tucker four years and $220MM, and then landed Bo Bichette on a three-year, $126MM deal with two player opt-out clauses. If Bichette hadn’t signed and Suarez had remained available, Sherman wrote that the Mets “would have pivoted to try to upgrade the rotation with a willingness to do the five years at $130 million Boston did.”
It’s an example of how the offseason can be a series of sliding doors, with a team’s priorities quickly changing when other teams start making moves and various star players leave the board. Bichette himself wasn’t even known to be a Mets target until the eleventh hour, as missing out on Tucker led the Mets to quickly turn to Bichette and snatch him away from an almost-finalized agreement with the Phillies. And, as it turned out, the Mets ended up landing their desired ace in inexpensive fashion in terms of money (Peralta is owed $8MM in 2026 before entering free agency next winter), but at the hefty trade cost of noted prospects Brandon Sproat and Jett Williams.
Prying Bichette away from the Phillies may have provided some measure of revenge for the Mets after their unsuccessful pursuit of Kyle Schwarber. New York was known to have interest in Schwarber’s services, and Sherman noted that the Mets “were much deeper in on him than previously publicly known.” It was widely expected that Schwarber would re-sign with the Phils and he indeed rejoined the club for five years and $150MM. As interested as the Mets were, Sherman wrote that they “perceived they would have to beat [five years/$150MM] by a good deal to get him to leave Philadelphia,” so the Amazins backed off.
The Mets had plenty of talks with the Marlins about Edward Cabrera before Cabrera was dealt to the Cubs, so it isn’t surprising that Weathers’ name was also brought up in those discussions. Sherman reported that 8-10 teams had interest in Weathers, and it ended up being the Yankees (another Cabrera suitor) who landed the southpaw for a four-prospect package.
It was no secret that the Pirates were looking to upgrade their lineup this offseason, and with a surplus of arms on the roster, the assumption was that Pittsburgh would look to move starting pitching for some bats. The five-player deal that sent Oviedo to Boston brought back Jhostynxon Garcia as a young outfielder who can help the Bucs as early as 2026, and Mike Burrows was traded to the Astros as part of the three-team swap with the Rays that brought Brandon Lowe to Pittsburgh.
With Oviedo and Burrows gone, the Pirates have probably closed the door on further pitching trades, as GM Ben Cherington has said the team would now be open to adding a bit of rotation depth, if anything. Chandler (one of baseball’s top pitching prospects) and Ashcraft (a former second-round pick) each made their MLB debuts in 2025 and look to be part of the Pirates rotation both this season and for years to come, if everything pans out.
Sherman said the Mets “extensively” discussed Chandler, Ashcraft, and Oviedo in negotiations with the Pirates, and it would be fascinating to know the specifics of those talks. Gauging by the Oviedo deal, the Bucs were presumably looking for controllable position-player talent, so any of Brett Baty, Mark Vientos, Ronny Mauricio, or even top prospect Carson Benge might have been on the Pirates’ wish list. If Pittsburgh had looked for more of a veteran bat in the Lowe mold, Jeff McNeil (who was dealt to the A’s just before Christmas) might have been a fit, but it is hard to imagine the Pirates would’ve given up a significant MLB-ready pitcher for McNeil.

Gonna miss you polar bear and sugar 😔
Yes, we will. But we are going to appreciate our new guys too.
*different* or *new* players doesnt necessarily mean *better* players
By midseason fans will start bringing “fire stearns” signs to games
lmao stop pretending you’re a Mets fan. Literally all you do is rip every single move they make and call them the “Mutts”. No one is buying it.
Did you miss what happened last year? I’ll miss Pete, Diaz (and Nimmo) too, but you can’t just run it back. Different is exactly what was needed.
You apparently did. Pete & diaz are the last reasons why Mets collapsed
chandlerbing: You’re quite certain of that? Some of us aren’t sure what’s going to happen this season. Perhaps you have knowledge not available to the rest of us.
Joel
Chandlerbing is a troll.
But even a broken analog clock is correct twice per day.
Alonso and Diaz were not responsible for the poorly assembled starting pitching. I have no idea whether there were clubhouse issues or not. But O do agree that the on-field performance of Alonso and Diaz had nothing to do with the team’s overall poor performance.
Why Diaz? lol
MLB: Everyone knows it was the starting pitching. Diaz was a blunder. Letting Alonso go also a mistake
Chandler (and his many alts) posting anti-Stearns slop accounts for 40% of the traffic to this site
MetsSchets: It does seem like the more irate they are, they more they post. I think Stearns crapped up initially but got better as the off-season went along. Of course, we won’t know for a couple of years if we won the Peralta trade.
Joel
Replace Bichette and Polanco with Alonso.
Replace Devin with Diaz.
Make the deals for Peralta, Semien and off-loading McNeil.
Sign one more free agent starting pitcher to a one or two year deal.
The Mets in 2026 could be like the Seahawks this year, getting rid of franchise favorites because they weren’t winning with them and replacing them with different talent
I think it would be hard for Peralta to turn down a Dylan Cease-sized contract if Mets offered a seven years, $210 million as an extension. Peralta is light years better than Cease but there is always a risk of injury.
Stearns met with Bichette in November. It was a laid out fallback plan not a reactionary pursuit to Tucker.
It was a dumb fallback plan that was still very much reactionary.
@JE
I can’t see the Mets, or any team, offering Bichette $42 mil early in the offseason.
@Knicks
Bregman got 40M for 1 year last year, Bichette got 42M for 1 year this year. Its an overpay but not as much as everybody think it is. These short term deals for all stars will always cost a premium for future flexibility.
The Mets are doing less with more better than any team in baseball. They traded Nimmo and McNeil basically telegraphing they were going after Tucker and Bellinger. They didnt get either and instead signed a shortstop who belongs at 2b to play 3b.
Don’t forget the 2b to play 1b.
Yeah thats not helping either. Probably worst corner infield defense in all of baseball.
Stearns started by emphasizing run prevention, and ends up with unproven players at the corners and a downgrade at closer. Unless he was just blowing hot air and didn’t really mean it, it’s hard to say he successfully executed his plan.
The Mets are obviously ruining baseball.
People wouldn’t be complaining about the Tucker and Diaz deals if the Mets hadn’t offered slightly less, forcing the poor Dodgers into spending more.
I know you are joking but better the Dodgers get Tucker for $57 million per year than for $45 million per year as it creates luxury tax dollars.
Thanks for the insight. What position do you hold in the Mets front office? You must be pretty high up to know so much about their plans and pursuit of Tucker and Bellinger.
Are you saying you dont think the Mets were in on Bellinger and Tucker?
Thats what I thought…….
Transitions from short to third are common, so try another line of argument.
@Joel from NY
Not when the player has below average arm strength.
llok: Oh, 38th percentile, catastrophic. Do you predict guys will beat out slow rollers hit to him or do you predict he’ll throw a lot of balls away compensating for the weak arm? Let’s say he’s below average there…his bat is worth it. Not the way you’d draw it up, having acquired Semien, but they missed on Tucker and it was the best available bat.
True, if the shortstop has a strong arm.
Joking aside, they made a hell of a push for Tucker.
They have aspects of the organization that will take time to get to the point of them being a destination team. But I believe they are all in, in their own way.
Whether you agree with their approach is another thing entirely.
Even with all these new additions, I don’t see the Mets really improving much or at all. Having an owner willing to spend is very nice and the fans should be grateful, but you’d hope the signings are calculated which they don’t seem to be lol.
A bratty Baty trade may be in the works for a top starter or top outfielder and then a starter could be traded away
You’re not getting that for him
Would be part of a bigger package
For some reason I see Roscoe in my head saying they are in hot pursuit.
They had a clubhouse issue and the 3 most tenured players were shown the door. I guess Alonso, Nimmo and McNeil were the clubhouse issues. I remember reading something about Nimmo and Lindor clashing on politics and McNeil and Lindor issues were well covered by the press. Not sure what Lindor had against Alonso, but aside from David Peterson, Lindor is the senior guy in the clubhouse now.
Lasagna
If what you say it true, then what they really have is a manager issue.
When guys in their 20s and early 30s get tens of millions per year playing a schoolyard game, the manager needs to get in everyone’s face to act and play like teammates who have a singular focus to be winners.
Sunday: disregard Mike Puma, the gossip monger. Anything for a click. So Lindor and McNeil weren’t chums, let’s write about it.
When not winning everything is an issue. First half of the year 2025 Mets were winning and no issues. Tailspin started and they couldn’t correct it. The team was completely changed. Mendoza is fortunate to have survived the Mets purge but he could be the first manager fired if the season doesn’t start out strong for the team
I think the Mets improved a lot for 2026 by acquiring Freddy Peralta. None of their other moves impressed me.
Replacing Diaz with Devin does not impress me.
Replacing Pete with Polanco does not impress me.
Replacing Nimmo with Luis Robert does not impress me.
Semien is an upgrade over McNeil and Luisangel but it means that Bichette will be at 3B and Vientos at DH.
Baty will be a utility unless he or Vientos is traded.
Benge should make Opening Day roster.
Soto, Lindor, Peralta and a couple good young pitchers.
If you count Dodgers, Phillies, Brewers and Cubs as likely post season teams, then Mets are fighting with Atlanta, Padres, Giants, Reds for two wild card spots.
I think by adding Peralta Mets might get one of the WC spots, but their messy hodgepodge of aging out of position acquisitions does not provide a building block for future greatness.
Not at all.
“but their messy hodgepodge of aging out of position acquisitions does not provide a building block for future greatness.”
Who are you referring to with “aging out of position acquisitions”? Polanco is the only one who fits that bill. Bichette and Robert aren’t old. Semien is playing in position.
And none of them are supposed to be a “building block for future greatness”. They’re there for 2026. Semien has the longest deal at three years and Bichette will probably opt out after one or two years. Polanco – two years. Robert is a FA after 2026. They’ve set themselves up to compete in 2026 and the only prospects of value they spent to do so were to get an ace. The “building blocks of future greatness” are their young players, at the majors or high minors (Benge, McLean, Tong, Christian Scott, Ewing, Clifford, Reimer, Wenninger, Watson, etc).
RCT
That is mostly fair.
Mets have put themselves in position to compete, at least for a wild card, in 2026. Semien, Bichette and Robert just seem old and/or oft-injured as a group.
Most of their new acquisitions will be gone in three years leaving an opportunity to build a very good team around 2029 with youngsters and totally new free agents.
That is a lot to spend for something that will be torn down in a couple years, but I do think you have that hodgepodge that best defense that can be given.
MLB top 500 commenter: Explain to us how Bichette and Robert are aging.
Joel
Well we are all “aging”. 😉
Yeah, they are oft-injured not old, I will agree.
The bullpen can use one more elite reliever. We could use another Ace but I wouldn’t expect a move like that to be made until the trade deadline. One of Peterson or Senga will be gone before the offseason ends. I also believe that Vientos is going to be traded as well
Mets would be crazy to trade Peterson that need a bottom of the rotation guy and he is it.
Not sure who would agree to trade for Senga. I sure don’t know if Senga will be an ace or out of baseball in 6 months but neither would surprise me.
I would not be surprised if they trade Vientos or Baty, and even as the better hitter Vientos makes more sense to trade as the Mets already have enough weak fielding infielders playing out of position.
I can’t imagine a trade for Chandler that would have been interesting to the Pirates based on their needs. Ashcraft maybe could be moved but it’d need to be Baty and someone else. Don’t think that’s likely at all.
Sandlot
A trade for Chandler, maybe Benge, and Mauricio and Baty. Maybe not.
Pirates probably won’t move anyone else from the rotation I would think. I mean if someone wants to overpay for Keller or Harrington I’m for it but no one is getting Bubba or Ashcraft.
When Cease signed early and Suarez not long after, it seemed like agents and pitchers had learned that holding out until the start of ST doesn’t work well. Time after time we see these guys get injured and have have bad years – but unfortunately Gallen and Valdez seem to be waiting until the bitter end. I think teams should decide by 1/31 and if these guys don’t sign – move on. I know this won’t happen but the alternative fails every time.
I am not sure Gallen had a choice since I doubt he was many teams Plan A. He will be signed in a week or so, I am guessing.
Love how this article has a photo of Skenes, to make reader’s think the Mets had trade discussions involving him.
Pursuits as in romantic or hobbies? The Mets system take up water painting or needlepoint
Encouraging takeaway for NYM fans is that many of these pursuits were unknown to media. Stearns FA is stealth so more can be in motion even now