![]() |
|
|
| |
« Contract Window For Miguel Cabrera? | Main | Mariners Listening On Sexson »
The hot stove buzz this morning is Joe Torre's coy remarks about Alex Rodriguez ending up in Dodger blue. Said Torre, "It's possible. It's possible. It's possible." There are a number of articles, but Dom Amore of the Hartford Courant reminds readers that Torre and A-Rod have been exchanging phone messages.
In Amore's article Torre adds that "you've got four or five clubs that figure to be in the sweepstakes." The Dodgers were on Jon Heyman's list of possible teams. If the Yankees offer Rodriguez arbitration, which he would decline, and he signs with the Dodgers, the Yankees would not gain a first round pick; however, I'd say the Dodgers and A-Rod make a good deal of sense. They'd certainly make room for him at 3B or SS. And Frank McCourt is the kind of owner not afraid to make a big splash.
Posted by Nat Boyle
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e20105349ecb90970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Torre: A-Rod to Dodgers?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Nat, I don't think what you said is correct. Pretty sure the rules are that if you have a protected 1st round pick, you give up second round pick instead when you sign a type A free agent.
Posted by: zs190 | November 10, 2007 at 08:53 AM
Instead of "gain nothing in draft picks"
Posted by: zs190 | November 10, 2007 at 08:53 AM
Oh and I think you still get the sandwich pick from the league when that happens too, so there is plenty to gain.
Posted by: zs190 | November 10, 2007 at 08:54 AM
I was going to check in on the same thing... In Tim's post from October about compensation
(www.mlbtraderumors.com/2007/10/more-on-free-ag.html)
he writes "I was reminded today that the first 15 picks in 2008's draft are protected. That means those 15 teams can sign Type A free agents (pretty much the best ones) and at worst only lose their second-round pick." What does he mean by "at worst," are their circumstances where they don't lose a second round pick for signing a Type A player who's been offered arbitration?
Posted by: MetFanBen | November 10, 2007 at 09:37 AM
Teams can sign multiple type A's. In that case if your 1st round pick is protected and your 2nd round pick is already gone from signing one type A, I think it goes down and you give up a 3rd round pick instead.
Posted by: zs190 | November 10, 2007 at 09:40 AM
What is Joe Torre supposed to say? "Fat chance?" Of course the Dodgers are in the market for A-Rod. That was a non-statement as far as I'm concerned.
Posted by: coryjwilson | November 10, 2007 at 09:43 AM
A-Rod could kiss Toree's ass in LA. I can care less they are both idiots. Thank god Toree left the yankees the guy just sits their and expects two pitchers to pitch the whole game.
Posted by: yankfan1 | November 10, 2007 at 10:00 AM
your right,cory. Let's face the facts. Ned Colletti hasn't made one smart signing or trade yet.
And Frank McCourt has signed off on every one of those stupid moves. ARod would be nice to have in LA. But at what price? The Dodgers don't need 1 "big bat". They need at least 2! And if the Dodgers can sign a big bat like Andruw Jones or Torri Hunter, they should trade for the other big bat. It makes more sense to spend the dough on two guys as opposed to spending it on one.
I still have no confidence in Ned Colleti though. He'll make the wrong moves.
He's probably gonna wait for all the decent free agents to come off the market, and then sign the leftovers. This is a good time for Ned to show he can be creative and spend money wisely. He must redeem himself for last season.
Posted by: jskohl | November 10, 2007 at 10:07 AM
If A-Rod is going to a Southern California team, it will be the Angels, and he will have to take a paycut. The Dodgers can't afford him, and the Angels are going to be hard pres to pay him as well.
Ironically the only team that can afford A-Rod, and need a third baseman is the Yankees. A-Rod is going to try to stay in the AL, and if he is going to go to the team offering the highest salary and long term contract, he is going to go with a team with a regional cable network, like both New York teams. One of the big handicaps of both Southern California Teams is the lack of regional sport network.
A-Rod isn't going to get $30-35 mil a year, nor a 10 year contract, both the Angels and the Dodgers can't afford that.
Posted by: okojo | November 10, 2007 at 10:28 AM
AROD in LA makes perfect sense, he can double date with the Beckhams. I mean if there was ever a baseball player who's nickname should be "Hollywood" it is AROD. Plus LA fans are the worst, absolute worst. I was in LA for a Dodger Vs. Giants game. All they did was boo Bonds all game, start fights with anyone in a Giants jersey. Hitting Beach Balls and doing the Wave 5 times around the stadium, when their team is down by one in 7th, to their supposed rivals... that was quickly followed by a mass exit... (They also showed up in the 3rd Inning) The Worst Fans in Baseball!
Posted by: Bonatom | November 10, 2007 at 10:56 AM
Thats funny, I like what Bonatom said. Fitting that the Worst Fans in Baseball get the Worst Contract in Baseball :)
Posted by: *Joba Rules* | November 10, 2007 at 11:06 AM
I am a Dodger fan. And yes, Bonatom is RIGHT! 100% RIGHT! I hate going to DOdger Stadium, because of the fans. Everyone is on their cell phone, or knocking around a beach ball. Dodger fans are blinded by their love more than any other fans. Nomar Garciaparra, as awful as he was this past season, gets disgusting amounts of cheers. And the fact that 3.8 million people went to Dodger Stadium last year to watch a fourth place team shows that the people don't care what kind of team is fielded. And it also shows that ownership is making money and spending it poorly ( Juan Pierre, new urinals)!!!!
Posted by: jskohl | November 10, 2007 at 11:40 AM
I concur on Alex to the Dodgers. For all Alex's ability, he does not seem like Mike Scioscia's type of player at all.
Posted by: mind_vs_body | November 10, 2007 at 11:41 AM
Kinda makes you wish the Dodgers moved back to Brooklyn.
Posted by: johnflaherty | November 10, 2007 at 11:44 AM
zs190: Thanks, you're right and that was poorly phrased.
Posted by: Nat Boyle | November 10, 2007 at 11:48 AM
Think we should clarify what LA fans mean.
If you mean Dodger fans then yes, they are terrible.
However, if you go to Angels game the place is rocking. Angel fans are passionate about their team.
Posted by: bjsguess | November 10, 2007 at 11:55 AM
I really really hope A-Rod signs with the Angels this off season. That way, the Yankees get a first round pick PLUS when they come to the Bronx for a Yankees home game, we can see him get his greedy ass booed out of town. It'll make 2006 boo's seem like cheers.
Posted by: Reywtf | November 10, 2007 at 12:03 PM
Maybe we should clarify where LA is. Anaheim, in Orange County, is where the Angels play. Chavez Ravine, in Los Angeles County, thats where the Dodgers play. I don't care what name you put in front of the Angels, that ain't LA.
Posted by: jskohl | November 10, 2007 at 12:06 PM
I don't think this really means anything. Of course Torre wouldn't mind adding A-Rod. I still think he will end up in California, but it will be with the ANAHEIM Angels, and not the Dodgers
Posted by: scribbletone | November 10, 2007 at 12:42 PM
Ok, WTF is going on.... Bonatom I dont know who the hell you think you are or what gibes you the right to judge a fan base due to your single experience. I have been a Dodger fan since I was young and have never arrived late or left early. I guess all fans walked in at the 3rd inning and left at the seventh, not just some.
As far as LA fans being the worst in baseball, go to an Oakland Raiders games and see what happens. Granted Dodger stadium is rowdy but it does not apply to every fan. I guess hitting beach balls and doing the wave makes you a bad fan, and none of that happens at any other stadium.
I am sure I could drop down to your guy's level and bash on your teams, but I wont categorize you guys with certain stereotypes of your city or fan base.
I am as passionate as all of you guys are if not more, so I take offense when you say things like "the worst fans in baseball", you are attacking something I take very personal. Attack the arguement (Torre and A-Rod) not the people.
Posted by: BleedsBlue55 | November 10, 2007 at 01:01 PM
The Dodgers can easily afford ARod. They have 47M coming off the payroll after '08. Kent, Furcal, Nomar, Loiaza, and Lowe will all be FA's. Schmidt contract is done after '09. That's a couple of nice players, but nobody that would really be missed considering the LAD farm system. They can take a one year hit to their payroll in '08.
I think signing Arod for 8/220-240M is a better move than trading for Cabrera. Arod is better now and probably better in 8 years. Even though Arod is older, he's taking care of his body. Cabrera will still have lots of success, but he will break down by 35 unless something changes.
Posted by: kab21 | November 10, 2007 at 01:15 PM
"A-Rod could kiss Toree's ass in LA. I can care less they are both idiots. Thank god Toree left the yankees the guy just sits their and expects two pitchers to pitch the whole game"
Yeah, all he did was manage u for 12 years and makes the playoffs in every season. Win 4 world series. All A-rod did was singlehandedly get u to the postseason this year when you would have been done in june without him. I guess this is one of the delusional yankee fans who thinks they can replace anybody no matter what, because they are the yankees. Your talking about the way that Torre handled a pitching staff? Well good luck with Girardi. Lets see what is up with the last pitching staff he managed.
Scott Olsen- Flat out lousy after a very nice rookie debut in 06.
John Johnson. Porbably will never be the same after being overworked in 06 and will now wiss al of 08 ( or most of it) on top of 07.
Anibal Sanchez- Missed entire 07 season
Ricky Nolasco- missed entire 07 season.
Have fun with Girardi abusing Hughes and Joba like he did to the marlins. Yankee fans dont realize what they lost in Torre, or atleast the stupid ones like yanksfan1. I get the idea he wasnt even born when the yankees last sucked. He probably is used to postseasons and division titles every year. Guess what Yanksfan. The Yankees were a mess where absolutely nobody wanted to play until Joe Torre got there. Guys love playing for Joe Torre. Not Joe Girardi, and that was Torre's greatest value to the yankees. The ability to manage a bunch of superstar egos and get along with them all and keep them all happy. You cant take that for granted. The times that a manager actually influences the outcome of a game with his managerial skills are minimal IMO. Your guys have to get the job done for you. Sounds like a bunch of sour grapes to me though.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 10, 2007 at 02:33 PM
"It'll make 2006 boo's seem like cheers."
Yeah, but he wouldnt care because you are supposed to get booed on the road, not at home when you are putting up numbers 95 percent of baseball players would consider a career year.
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 10, 2007 at 02:38 PM
Bleedsblue, if you are sucha passionate fan who has never once been even 1 pitch late to a game, then it should annoy you that you are surrounded by a bunch of idiots who hit beach balls onto the field like idiots. Go to the beach to play with a beach ball. ANd btw, its a nationwide thing, making fun of dogdger fans and they habits of leaving early and hitting beach balls. Not just bonatom. Take a chill pill my friend. Deep breaths.
Wooooooooooooooooooo-sah
Posted by: nrmax88 | November 10, 2007 at 02:41 PM
Nrmax88 --Not one person has ever hit a beach ball or done the wave at your stadium of choice?? They are allowed to do as they choose, they paid as much or more for a ticket just like me.
"idiots".... to me idiots are people who throw bottles at players... To me that is idiotic.
Also, since it is a nationwide thing, that makes it completely alright to continue it. I realize that it is not just bonatom, but if I dont say anything people who have never been to LA area or Dodger stadium may get the wrong idea. Just because "everyone else is doing it" does not make it ok. Lets lose the child like mentality.
As far as taking a chill pill, I am calm, just stating my opinion like all other posters on here. I take offense when we begin attacking people/fans/communities instead of sticking to the baseball issue.
If I am wrong on this, then please tell me, but I think all other passionate fans would feel the same.
Posted by: BleedsBlue55 | November 10, 2007 at 02:59 PM
Amen BleedsBlue55
Posted by: LADFan | November 10, 2007 at 03:51 PM
SoCal fans are just awful in general. USC/Angels/Dodgers/Lakers/Ducks, all awful, bandwagon fans. I've lived out here for 10 years now and honestly, the media and the fans are what I hate most. They are way more bandwagon than any other group. And on the whole, they know the least about the game. It's a running joke with me and friends that there wasn't an Angel fan before 2002, and it's essentially true. If you go to an Angels' game you won't find any "faded" red in the whole stadium, if you know what I mean.
I've been a Laker fan all my life, but if I wasn't so damn loyal to them, I'd hate them now too just because of the fan base. It really is awful out here for that aspect.
Most fans go to games because it's "the thing to do" out here. Or because of some damn rally monkey marketing campaign. I would almost submit that Angels' fans are worse than Dodgers fans, but it's all semantics, because they're all bad out here.
We can go through all the reasons for it; great weather, too many other things to do, traffic, etc. But that doesn't change the fact that they are a less committed/less fanatical fan-base.
Posted by: djskilbr | November 10, 2007 at 05:39 PM
nrmax, the Yankees didn't change under Torre. They changed when Showalter came in. The Stump Merril days were pretty bad, but the Yankees started playing well and becoming attractive with Buck. When Torre came in, they were already a playoff team.
And comparing Torre's first year to Showalter's last year, you replaced a declining Mattingly with Tino Martinez at his peak, added Jeter, had the first full season of Mariano Rivera in the bullpen. That was a much better team than the previous year, so you would expect better results.
Posted by: yanksfan | November 10, 2007 at 05:49 PM
Well Im sorry you feel that way, in a small sense I can see where you are coming from. But Ill tell you what why its more bandwagon, less loyalty and heart...
Its the amount of teams. There are way too many teams in such a small area that people feel that they can associate with whoever is winning.
In the LA area you have almost two of everything: Lakers/Clippers, Dodgers/Angels, Ducks/Kings. And that is just the LA area, not to mention how close San Diego, Sacramento, and San Fran are.
If the amount of teams were reduced to one for each sport, the drive and that loyalty would return. Dont blame the people, blame the owners and their drive for money. Especially, in this case, Arte Moreno who HAD to put Los Angeles into his team name.
Thats my two cents on it anyway.
Posted by: BleedsBlue55 | November 10, 2007 at 05:53 PM
I maybe off base but I dont think too many fans bolted to the Angels because Moreno slapped the "Los Angeles" label on them. People who live in LA don't drive down to Anaheim to see the Angels. Dodgers fans have always showed up and droves and will continue to, regardless of what the Angels do.
Posted by: J.L. | November 10, 2007 at 06:12 PM
The Dodgers can't afford A-Rod, that $47 million is used to pay Garciaparra and Kent and others will have to be used to get players with some big league experience, or one is going to have the team that A-Rod played at Texas, A-Rod and the eight dwarves, or the situation in Florida with the Marlins.
The Dodgers won't paying A-Rod salary if they signed him, Bank of America via loans to the Dodgers will be paying his salary.
Posted by: okojo | November 10, 2007 at 06:51 PM
LOL....Such sour grapes here.
Calling LA fans "bandwagon fans" is laughable. They draw some of the highest attendance figures in all of MLB, despite having fielded a slightly above mediocre product. Are LA fans dispassionate? I'd have to agree with this to some extent.
I'd like to see some backup information to the claim that one of the posters here made saying that the Dodgers couldn't afford Arod. With Gonzo, Wolf, and some of the rentals coming off the books, I believe McCourt wouldn't have to increase the payroll at extroardinary amount at all, thanks to the bevy of youth on the team. Now, McCourt might run into problems in the out years, when your Loney's and Billingsley's get a few years under their belts and will, inevitably, be asking for bigger money.
Posted by: DodgersLBC | November 10, 2007 at 08:45 PM
Major League fans seem to be much the same from city to city with only slight degrees of difference. No doubt Philly fans are slightly more intense than Padre fans...etc.
In general from, my experience, the fan base is more sedated than it used to be all around MLB. The rowdy blue collar fans have been tucked away in the 500 section or in the outfield. Fan expectation has changed a great deal. Sadly, the game seems to be secondary much of the time. Taking a back seat to other forms of "baseballtainment."
Posted by: coryjwilson | November 10, 2007 at 09:41 PM
To outsiders, Southern California fans look apathetic, but they love sports team and support them thick and thin. The problem with LA is traffic, and everyone knows that Dodger Stadium will have a huge back up in the off ramps during game day, which one reason people seem to arrive during the third inning. If the game looks like a blow out, people want to get a jump getting out of the parking lot, and hopefully on the freeway before everyone else.
One thing that always perplex me, is that Mike Scioscia lives in Thousand Oaks, but commutes the 70-75 miles to Anaheim, through some of the worst traffic congestion on this planet.
Another don't be put off by the attitude at Dodger Stadium. Dodger Stadium is one of the best places in MLB to watch a baseball game, it is dry, mostly cool with an occasional hear scorcher, and the stadium will last as long as Fenway or Wrigley. A midge problem at the pitcher's mound is the least of a concern at Dodger Stadium. I like watching a game much better at Dodger Stadium than at Anaheim Stadium, even though I like Angels better as a ball club, given it full of former Dodgers like Scioscia and Hatcher who got kicked out during the Murdoch era.
Posted by: okojo | November 10, 2007 at 11:04 PM
I've been to a couple of Dodger games the past few years and it depends where you sit. When I sit in the lower level, it was pretty dull. There was cheering, but no one seemed die hard. When I sit in the upper levels, people seem to be more into it. Granted, there are plenty of teenagers/yuppies/troublemakers at the game who are just present just because it's the cool place to be, but there are also plenty of real fans. I guess it all comes down to perspective.
Posted by: Chillin | November 11, 2007 at 05:38 AM
Oh yeah, and I can't stand attending Angels games. When you look around, it's like a nursing home. Crazy old people who are cheering but don't seem to know what they are cheering for.
Posted by: Chillin | November 11, 2007 at 05:41 AM
No doubt.
I bet very few Angel "fans" in attendance even realize what sport they're watching.
That has always been my impression attending games there at least.
Posted by: djskilbr | November 11, 2007 at 03:00 PM
In regards to dissing the dodgers so hard for 2007, "a fourth place team" etc...You have to remember coming into 2007 we looked really good, had the best record in MLB around the 1/2 of the season, the reason we failed was lack of 1) communication - managers fault and 2) lack of leadership - manager/leader? fault.
Torre will help that area alot, time to buy talent and ride the youngsters this year.
Posted by: ca!i sty!e | November 12, 2007 at 09:47 AM