![]() |
|
|
| |
« Padres Rumors: Iguchi, Eckstein, Barrett, Bonds | Main | Odds and Ends: Inge, Greene, Pavano »
UPDATE, 12-11-07 at 10:48am: Just talked to a good source on this stuff. He told me Fukudome wants five years, despite what we've read. The Cubs don't expect he'll sign for $50MM for five years, and are offering that amount over four. They're having an internal debate about stretching it to a five-year, $65MM offer. Jim Hendry wants to stop at four years though.
FROM 12-11-07 at 10:03am:
Interesting piece of information from Tom Krasovic today - he says the Cubs are willing to offer close to $50MM for Kosuke Fukudome. They really want this guy and have built their offseason plan around him.
It's hard to believe the Cubs would offer that amount for three years; that would be $16.6MM annually to someone who's never played in the Majors. I could definitely see the Cubs putting out a four-year, $50MM offer though. Who knows how much validity there is to the idea that Fukudome wants three years and only three years.
The Padres have gone at least three years and at least $10MM annually, but it could be more on both accounts. Kevin Towers says the team's offer was final. He sees Fukudome landing in Chicago or San Diego. That might mean he considers the White Sox to be in the mix as well.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534ad975a970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cubs Willing To Offer $50MM For Fukudome?:


|
|
I would hope, for the Cubs sake, that it's a four year deal. That backloaded payroll just keeps getting larger and larger... I'm not sure it can maintain a 16 million per year player.
Posted by: CarpeDiem | December 11, 2007 at 10:10 AM
I could see Fukudome insisting on three years, it just makes good business sense. If he proves he can be Ichiro-like star, then in three years he can set himself up for an even bigger payday.
Why lock himself in for an extra year or two at a lower price, especially considering how the market might expand three years from now...
Posted by: astrosfan | December 11, 2007 at 10:16 AM
I have read several articles containing comments about Fukudome by Towers; but I have not seen any that declared their present offer as "final"!!!
If anyone has a link for this, it would be important!
Posted by: BroLight | December 11, 2007 at 10:22 AM
Never mind! I just missed it when I read this article earlier this morning.
If it is indeed "final"; Cubs should at least eliminate the Pads pretty quickly.
However, there is a degree of "desperation" behind the bids of teams like the White Sox, Rangers & Giants! Any one of these could produce a surprise kick in the pants for the Cubs!
Posted by: BroLight | December 11, 2007 at 10:27 AM
Well if the Cubs don't get Fukudome, there isn't much else out there. Fukudome is going to get a lot of money just because of how he bats and the fact he can backup some CF. I can't think of another high OBP left-handed bat who can play back-up CF. It's critical to have that back-up CF aspect because Pie sucks against lefties. He's no superstar against righties right now, but at least it's above the mendoza line.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 10:34 AM
I have a feeling that Pagan get some starts against lefties...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 10:39 AM
We'll kick back. Fukudome is missing piece to the puzzle. With him the starting OF against righties is Soriano in LF, Pie in CF, Fukudome in RF. Against lefties it's Soriano in LF, Fukudome in CF, Murton in RF. If we don't get Fukudome then things get tricky.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 10:43 AM
or Fuld if he makes the team
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 10:43 AM
Pagan is dealing with a major illness. Nothing in his career suggests planning on him being healthy.
Fuld batted .269 at Triple-A last year and was 0-6 at the MLB level. He's 26 years old. He's not someone to count on.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 10:47 AM
I actually think thats a good idea...Murton needs to get some ABs or we need to trade him. He is too good to just be sitting right now.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 10:50 AM
If the cubs don't get Fukudome we can start the always fun JD Drew trade rumors- hype up the roberts rumors or just ship Murton for Teahan. Perhaps Bonds in LF?
Posted by: touchmymonkey | December 11, 2007 at 10:53 AM
Give him 5 years...thats fine with me...I have a good feeling on this guy...
Posted by: uww1 | December 11, 2007 at 11:04 AM
I hope the Cubs give him a contract as stupid as the Soriano deal. When will they learn that hype and money don't make a player good? Five years? He allready has health questions. He'll be useless those last couple of years. Even in Wrigley he won't have the power he had in Japan. He didn't even hit .300 over there. Fukudome is the most over-rated player out there. He will be the biggest bust of this off season except for Kaz Matsui, but at least nobody is giving him 5/50.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 11:13 AM
His hitting might not translate, but there is no reason that he defense won't, and that is very important for the Cubs as well. He is also a very patient hitter known for his high OBP. That should translate for the most part, I don't see him coming over and swinging at everything. Like I have said before, even if he only hits like .270, he should still have at LEAST a .350 OBP...which would great for the Cubs, especially with good defense.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 11:19 AM
http://www.mercurynews.com/sports/ci_7689773?nclick_check=1
Are the Giants still in on Fukudome?
Posted by: IowaCubs | December 11, 2007 at 11:21 AM
Save the money for another starting pitcher and get Teahen from KC for RF..The Cubs are just not going to win a playoff series with Lilly as your #2 starter... I would rather see the Cubs focus on a blockbuster trade with Balt. that would include both Roberts & Bedard.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 11:33 AM
The expectations are going to be high for him. I did not expect to read 5 @ 65.
Posted by: Oh Boy | December 11, 2007 at 11:39 AM
If cubs sign him they still need pitching.. the white sox would be a great team, him and J-Dye next to each other would be great...KC is brutal they can sign a-rod and they would still suck
Posted by: futureprospect3 | December 11, 2007 at 11:42 AM
Who is this Kosuke Fukudome you speak of? Never heard of him!
;)
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | December 11, 2007 at 11:47 AM
I really liked the idea of 3 years because it's just not long of a contract. There's a lot of hype around Fukudome, and I really want the Cubs to get him. It makes sense for a lot of reasons. His defense in one of the toughest right fields in the majors and his OBP are two of them. After he gets acclimated to MLB, he sounds like he'd be perfect for the #2 hole in the lineup. Plus, with a 3-year contract, it's just not as damaging if he gets hurt or doesn't adjust well to MLB. Going 4-5 years is getting into dangerous territory, especially since it's almost a sure thing that Hendry will backload the contract and the Cubs don't know anything about their payroll past 2008. With 3 years, the Cubs could've just gone with a relatively low-risk contract along the lines of Furcal's.
P.S.-To whoever said that Fukudome didn't even hit .300 in Japan -you need to look over his stats again. It looks to me that, outside of his rookie season, anytime Fukudome reached 500 PA, he batted well over .300. On top of it, his OBP will drop some with the transition, but I believe it'll stay in the high-.300's.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 11:48 AM
He seems like too big of a gamble for me. 5 years, $65m (or whatever it takes) is way too much for a player whose best case is a slightly worse Hideki Matsui. He's not young (will be 31 next season) and is coming off major elbow surgery. Why would you give him more money then Jose Guillen who has a much better track record and is only one year older? Seems like the perfect player for the Cubs to overpay.
Posted by: Schlom | December 11, 2007 at 11:53 AM
Jose Guillen carries more baggage than Bill Gates' wife on a shopping trip to Harrod's.
Posted by: Dave | December 11, 2007 at 12:09 PM
The cubs even if they get him will not contend with that god awful rotation. If they were in any AL division they would be in last place with or without Fukudome, and all of you overate their prospects. Not one of those prospects will be a major contibuter in the majors. Gallegher sucks, Pie is overated, The league will adjust to marmol, and stop thinking you can get anything for murton or cedeno because that is just ignorant! If any GM guys like that they should wait until players are non tendered, and you will find better value without having to give up anything.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 12:10 PM
but they're not in the AL, so there pitching staff and lineup can contend in the NL Central.
Posted by: trober81 | December 11, 2007 at 12:12 PM
"The cubs even if they get him will not contend with that god awful rotation."
You are an absolute moron. The Cubs had the 2nd best rotation in the NL last year. Are you really that ignorant of reality?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 12:17 PM
Weren't they 6th in mlb, too?
Posted by: Dave | December 11, 2007 at 12:19 PM
Not to mention Bill James projects Zambrano, Hill, and Lilly to all have ERAs below 4 next year...but hey, who pays attention to facts and projections anyway?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 12:25 PM
LOL, yeah the Cubs and their 4th in the MLB ERA are so god awful.
Marshall and Gallagher are a year older and even Kevin Hart might start. I'm not counting on it at all but Samardjiza could even be ready by August. I wouldn't bet a penny on it, but don't rule it out either.
Posted by: TrueCubsFan | December 11, 2007 at 12:26 PM
At that price, the padres are out, thank god. A 4yr 50mil contract would tie up our payroll. I'm just happy that we r driving up the price. I can't wait to see in a couple of years what happens to the cubs when all those backloaded contracts come up!
Posted by: UCSDPadsFan | December 11, 2007 at 12:26 PM
Zambrano is an injury waiting to happen, Lilly overacheived last season and will come back down to earth, as did Marqis if that is how you spell it which he did in the second half, Hill might be a halfway descent but gives up the longball to much and Dumpter, Hart lol. They got hart from the orioles for freddie bynumm. A team that is starving for young pitching. If he was any good they would have held on to him and if they needed a scrubb utility man that bad they should have hit up waivers, You might have found a better option there!
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 12:26 PM
The simple case for overpaying can be stated by Rafael Furcal. A couple off-seasons ago the Cubs were outbid by LA. A bad contract maybe but then domino effect hurt worse than a couple mil would have. They made a panic trade (and got taken) for Juan Pierre who left with little compensation back. I'm sure the Cubs would love to have those trade chips back now for Bedard, Roberts, etc.
If the Cubs want to go all out, I'd suggest 4/$50 for Fukudome. Play him in CF with DeRosa in RF. Trade Pie, Marshall, Gallagher, Cedeno, and maybe even someone like Donnie Veal for Bedard and Roberts.
LF - Soriano
2B - Roberts
1B - Lee
CF - Fukudome
3B - Ramirez
RF - DeRosa
C - Soto
SS - Theriot
P - Zambrano, Lilly, Bedard, Hill, Marquis/Prior/Dempster
You can even shift DeRosa to SS on days you want Theriot to be off and have Murton in RF.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 12:27 PM
I look forward to the great Chicago firesale of 2008-9.
Posted by: agro23 | December 11, 2007 at 12:31 PM
in all reality, do you guys really think bedard and roberts are comin to the cubs ?? i think the cubs will get severely outbid for bedard with more major league ready talent.
Posted by: trober81 | December 11, 2007 at 12:35 PM
Fukudome is going to be bringing Japanese ads to Wrigley, paying for some of his contract himself. Chicago firesale? Has that EVER happened? That was a dumb comment.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 12:36 PM
Stop bringing up Bedard. The Cubs don't have near enough prospects to grab him.
Posted by: Teetz | December 11, 2007 at 12:37 PM
good point teetz.
if the rumors are somewhat true about the reds interest, and they are talking about votto and homer bailey in the deal, the cubs dont have any prospects that match those two.
Posted by: trober81 | December 11, 2007 at 12:40 PM
I agree...Bedard is not going to happen. let it go.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 12:40 PM
i agree that the cubs' rotation is not that amazing, but it is great for the league now. Murton is a great prospect, though i agree that pie is overrated. we need more talented pitching. our farm pitching is great, but it will take a season or two for it to mature. if we do not land an outfielder, we will be in more trouble than not having pitching.
For years, the Cubs were a team that played low run games. We had pitching that was typically great, when we had Wood, Estes, Prior, and Zambrano was still a minor-leaguer. We need to get back to that level, but have an offense. Back then, we had Sosa and a bunch of failure fielders. We also had Alfonseca back then, and he was great.
Marmol is not fully matured yet in my opinion, and i could see him being even better this year than he was in 07. In my opinion, we should keep Prior and let him rehab, then bring him back and let him achieve the massive potential he showed years ago.
A rotation would look like this:
Zambrano
Lilly
Hill
Marquis
Prior
That would be hugely powerful in today's NL Central. Also, we could deal Murton and a couple other minors players for more middle relief and another starter if needed.
If anybody could be sacraficed for a bit of trade bait, it would be Ryan Dumpster. he is awful, and it hurt me every time they put him in to close out a game last season because he always gave up a run.
Fukudome would add unbelievable depth to the Cubbies bench. I think we should even look for another center fielder to platoon with Pie. Pie needs another year to mature, but i could see him being great in a year or two
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 12:41 PM
There is going to be no firesale. Learn the english language dumbass --
Fire Sale (from dictionary.com) -- A situation in which the prices of securities in the financial markets are considered to be very low.
Baseball players dont seem like securities in the financial market to me...
Also, the cubs are not going to burn out on money. The club is going to be sold, and the new buyer will probobly spend more on the club.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 12:48 PM
Estes, Alfonseca......REALLY??
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 12:50 PM
"The cubs even if they get him will not contend with that god awful rotation. If they were in any AL division they would be in last place with or without Fukudome, and all of you overate their prospects. Not one of those prospects will be a major contibuter in the majors. Gallegher sucks, Pie is overated, The league will adjust to marmol, and stop thinking you can get anything for murton or cedeno because that is just ignorant! If any GM guys like that they should wait until players are non tendered, and you will find better value without having to give up anything."
You are not smart at all, the Cubs had one of the best starting rotations in baseball last year even with Zambrano and Marquis being extremely inconsistent and Rich Hill being in his first full year. Zambrano has a good chance to be more consistent as he matures, and Hill will continue to get better with experience. Lilly should be solid again, and Marquis is good as a #4/#5 starter. The last spot has many candidates, Prior, Marshall, Gallagher, Hart, Dempster, etc. The rotation should be even better this year with Trachsel not getting any starts and a guy like Marshall getting more experience. Gallagher does not suck, you can't base your opinion of someone on 14 innings of long relief, thats unwise.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 12:50 PM
Pie is going through growing pains, but has killed the ball at every level he has gone through and is still young. He has raw talent and has a decent shot into becoming very good.
Murton is a good player and a good trade chip that could be used to acquire a pretty good player. No one is saying that we would be able to use him as a center piece in a Bedard or Santana deal.
The best part about your post is the Marmol comment. I love how everyone just looks at other teams best young players and make the statement "The league will adjust to him." Lol, maybe did it occur to you that the guy is just good? I don't care what you say, baseball players wont adjust to hitting a slider that can nearly curve around your bat when he is throwing it well. If the league just adjusted to every player in the league over time the whole league would just be mediocre and that doesn't happen, some guys are just better than others, and if you had time to watch Marmol make nearly everyone he faced last year look silly, you would realize that your probably just upset that your team doesn't have a guy like him.
My bet is that you are unhappy that the Cubs will outbid your team for Fukudome. Sorry, if that happens, your going to have to live with it because that's why being in a large market in baseball is nice.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 12:51 PM
and whats up with everyones posts coming out as "Posted by: |"????? i cant tell who is who anymore!
Posted by: trober81 | December 11, 2007 at 12:53 PM
My prediction for the Cubs lineup next year:
2B. Brian Roberts
SS. Ryan Theriot/Mark DeRosa/Ronny Cedeno
1B. Derrek Lee
3B. Aramis Ramirez
LF. Alfonso Soriano
RF. Kosuke Fukudome
C. Geovany Soto
CF. Felix Pie
I think it would be better to have Kos-K bat 2nd and then the Theriot spot 8th, or 7th if Pie is somehow not outhitting Theriot, but I don't see this happening because Lou and Jim get aroused when the see the order say R/L/R/L instead of L/L.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:01 PM
Well maybe my Marmol comment was stretchig it, But I just feel that the biased cub fans on this site overate their prospects. I am intitled to my opinion and I feel the only way they will will win a world sereis is to "BUY ONE", and when they fail at that I can laugh even harder at them than I do now as I pass wrigley field on the way to work everyday and just laugh at it.
Posted by: CUBS=NOTHING | December 11, 2007 at 01:02 PM
Has all of this Kos-K talk made everyone forget about Prior's big day tomorrow? Or did he sign and I missed it? In any case, how exciting is it to think of Santo trying to announce "Fukudome"? I can already feel myself laughing.
Posted by: ARSmitty | December 11, 2007 at 01:04 PM
They do have the people to get bedard, they just aren't willing to deal the ones Baltimore wants...
Any Cub fans holding out hope for Bedard are wasting their energy.
In other news, I heard Fukudome decided to go back to Japan now.
Posted by: Dave | December 11, 2007 at 01:05 PM
Yeah, my name isn't showing on my posts for some reason..
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 01:07 PM
Ok, now it is.
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 01:09 PM
If the cubs sign fukudome, no fan of theirs can ever make fun of the yanks for buying championships (if they can even win one)... i cannot wait too see how they deal with the backloaded contracts myself.
If they want bedard and roberts, they're risking their not so distant future. As a sox fan with a sad farm system, we're feeling it now, better to try and develope players, than go for a quick fix that doesn't pan out.
Posted by: whitesoxfan424 | December 11, 2007 at 01:09 PM
"I am intitled to my opinion and I feel the only way they will will win a world sereis is to "BUY ONE"
Funny when YOUR TEAM had a higher payroll than the Cubs did last year!!! Even after spending "400 mil" like all the Cubs haters try and throw out there all the time...
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:10 PM
When will Eric Patterson be ready?
Also, while I think Lilly "overperformed" last year, it wasn't inexplicable. He transitioned well from the AL to the NL Central, and there is no reason this would change other than the central catching up to him (like the Comedy Central is going to catch up to anyone though).
Here's something I find entertaining... Rich Hill or older than Zambrano. Yep, look it up. And while Z certainly has a lot more service time, there is no reason to think he can't maintain his current skill level. He has high endurance and has pitched 200+ innings the past five years. Both Hill and Zambrano are great, and Lilly should be able to pitch at around the same level at age 31.
Between Marshall, Gallagher, and Prior, the Cubs could have a great rotation. At the very least, it will be one of the better in the National League. One day some Cubs-hater will realize that a team in the NL needs only compare themselves to the NL... If you want to say that the Red Sox or the Tigers are the favorites to win the World Series, I'm astonished at your creativity.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:14 PM
The sox farm system is not as bas as people think. I hear Foutino de los santos has the makeup of fellow countryman pedro Martinez, the younger version that is lol? Problem is he is atleast 3 years away. And the Sox payroll was so high by resigning there own players. They have never gone out and spent 100 million an offseason let alone 300 million
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:21 PM
@Dave
who do the cubs have that would entice baltimore for bedard and roberts? just curious on your opinion. im not sayin they dont have talent in the minors, but from all indications on this site, the orioles are looking for ML ready top prospects for bedard.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:24 PM
"nd the Sox payroll was so high by resigning there own players"
Thats funny, guys like Thome, Vazquez, Dye, and Contreras were yours? When?
As for Bedard, the cubs could give up Hill, Marmol, Pie, Soto...all of which they would love to have, but it would create way too many holes. Thats not even getting into the system...but the Cubs aren't going to do it, so there is no sense in talking about it like it might happen.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:27 PM
CUBS=NOTHING, you are a joke, your entire happiness in terms of baseball is directly correlated to the Cubs success, and your a White Sox fan. Get a hobby other than being jealous of the Cubs. This is the perfect example of how 75% of White Sox fans follow baseball which just furthers my belief that they are the scum of baseball fans and don't deserve to follow a team. When the Sox won in '05 more Sox fans rubbed it in my face that it wasn't the Cubs than the fact that it WAS the Sox. Go away, you should be embarrassed that you are part of the worst group of fans in sports, thanks.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:28 PM
"nd the Sox payroll was so high by resigning there own players"
Its not like you brought them up...so what the hell does it matter when you got them, if they weren't yours in the beginning?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 01:29 PM
Two trades & one signing: 1) Get Teahen from KC for Murton & Fox.. 2)Get Roberts for Pie, Marshall & Hart or Gallagher if necessary... 3)Sign Fukudome..
1B Lee
2B Roberts
SS Theriot/Cedeno
3B Ramirez
LF Soriano
CF Fukudome
RF Teahen
C Soto
SP Zambrano,Hill,Lilly, Demptster & Marquis
RP Wood,Howry,Marmol,Wuertz, Ascanio & Lahey
Look for one trade in June for good starter...
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:32 PM
"Thats funny, guys like Thome, Vazquez, Dye, and Contreras were yours? When?"
Um since they have been on the White Sox payroll....Its pretty obvious he means the Sox have resigned players that were still under contract with the Sox as opposed to signing a lot of free agents.
Its really not that hard to understand. But by the sound of your posts you are a pretty ignorant a$$hole and I wouldn't think you would understand that. Your talking $hit about Sox fans, take a look in the mirror you sound like and absolute piece of piece of $hit for a human being.
Posted by: SoxWin | December 11, 2007 at 01:37 PM
You should be embarrassed for beiing part of the worst team in all of sports. I am just stating my opinion. My entire happiness is alot more than just baseball, but I do get a laugh out of the cubs year after year.
Posted by: CUBS=NOTHING | December 11, 2007 at 01:38 PM
lets not get into cubs and sox fan percentage bashing here.... it could start to get real ugly.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:41 PM
Everyone else's farm systems must be outstanding if the Sox system isn't that bad because the Sox are about to be ranked 29th by Baseball America. And the Sox had the fourth highest payroll in baseball last year. 4th place. Talk about money well spent.
Posted by: cachhubguy | December 11, 2007 at 01:44 PM
oh and @Dave,
i was just assuming leaving hill, marmol, and soto out of it. if i were the cubs, i wouldnt get rid of them.
Posted by: trober81 | December 11, 2007 at 01:45 PM
Nothing, you weren't laughing last year when we swept you in your own house.
Posted by: cachhubguy | December 11, 2007 at 01:46 PM
trober,
Then you do admit they have the pieces to get it done. My point was just that the Cubs do have some affordable young talent that could fetch some stars, they just aren't in the position to pull the trigger.
I had another response typed up, but this typekey thing flagged it for antispam, not to mention the repeated problems with registration...man typekey sucks.
Posted by: Dave | December 11, 2007 at 01:49 PM
right, i just kept reading other people putting gallagher, marshall, pie, cedeno, etc. out there and i didnt think those types would be enough.
Posted by: trober81 | December 11, 2007 at 01:53 PM
CUBS=NOTHING
Look at your name...enough said.
As for you Sox Win...LIKE I SAID, what does it matter when you got them? Does it matter that you resigned them or got them via FA? The Cubs have guys like Zambrano, Hill, Pie, Soto, Marmol, Theriot, Marshall, Fontenot...and others that contributed to a division win that they have had since the farm....so now they are the yankees because they got Sori, Lilly, Marquis, and DeRosa? Whatever...those were all good moves except maybe the Marquis signing, but even he has earned his money so far. Then they have guys like Lee and Ramirez, who they "resigned", just like the Sox so wonderfully did. What are you even talking about???
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 01:56 PM
by the way, I forgot Wuertz...who somehow might be the most under rated reliever in the NL
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 01:59 PM
"Everyone else's farm systems must be outstanding if the Sox system isn't that bad because the Sox are about to be ranked 29th by Baseball America. And the Sox had the fourth highest payroll in baseball last year. 4th place. Talk about money well spent."
...and the cubs spent 95 million to go a handful of games over .500 in order to win the worst division in baseball only to get swept in the first round of the playoffs. You call that money well spent? Quit being delusional.
Like it matters what any team in the NL does anyways, they are still going to get their a$$ pounded in the World Series for the foreseeable future. The AL has seemingly got stronger yet again after this off-season with another marquee player (Miggy) moving from the weak to the strong.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 02:05 PM
Pie contributed to the cubs sad 85 win division title? if you say so. The Brewers bullpen contributed the most to the cubs division title by blowing a major league high 25 games or so. What I am trying to say is that cub fans can go in to an offseason knowing there team has a better chance a getting a "big Fish" then we do. I am not complaining or anything I wouldn't be a Cubs fan for all the beer in wrigleyville.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 02:07 PM
Did some idiot cubs fan really state the def. of fire sale and related it to the finacial market out side of baseball? This is a BASEBALL forum, so firesale in baseball means Marlins.
And someone called the sox pathetic? As a neutral non-Chicago person, who won a world series recently? And I can't tell you how many ppl I saw switch from cubs to white sox gear for those two months. And only you guys know if you did it or not, but I bet some of you jumped onto the wagon too.
I am jealous of the cubs spending, but you guys are inching close to being the highest NL payroll. And with that high of a payroll coming up, who would be dumb enough to buy a franchise that hasn't made it to the big dance since 1945?
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 02:07 PM
""As for you Sox Win...LIKE I SAID, what does it matter when you got them? Does it matter that you resigned them or got them via FA? The Cubs have guys like Zambrano, Hill, Pie, Soto, Marmol, Theriot, Marshall, Fontenot...and others that contributed to a division win that they have had since the farm....so now they are the yankees because they got Sori, Lilly, Marquis, and DeRosa? Whatever...those were all good moves except maybe the Marquis signing, but even he has earned his money so far. Then they have guys like Lee and Ramirez, who they "resigned", just like the Sox so wonderfully did. What are you even talking about???""
I must have misunderstood what you said.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 02:08 PM
""As for you Sox Win...LIKE I SAID, what does it matter when you got them? Does it matter that you resigned them or got them via FA? The Cubs have guys like Zambrano, Hill, Pie, Soto, Marmol, Theriot, Marshall, Fontenot...and others that contributed to a division win that they have had since the farm....so now they are the yankees because they got Sori, Lilly, Marquis, and DeRosa? Whatever...those were all good moves except maybe the Marquis signing, but even he has earned his money so far. Then they have guys like Lee and Ramirez, who they "resigned", just like the Sox so wonderfully did. What are you even talking about???""
I must have misunderstood what you said.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 02:10 PM
1. Whoever told me that Fukudome hit .300 is right. He is a career .305 hitter. I was making wide generalizations about stats I only remembered off the top of my head. My bad. BA can be misleading anyway (Juan Pierre).
2. The term fire sale is a colloquialism. (you can use dictionary.com if you don't know what that means)
3. Nobody wants to listen to you two bicker about which Chicago team sucks more. It's the Blackhawks.
4. Am I alone in thinking that Fukudome isn't worth nearly this much?
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 02:36 PM
just looked at teahens stats...
why dont the cubs pursue him instead of spending 50 mil on fukudome. they are very similar players.
any thoughts?
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 02:49 PM
"You should be embarrassed for beiing part of the worst team in all of sports. I am just stating my opinion. My entire happiness is alot more than just baseball, but I do get a laugh out of the cubs year after year."
I'll start by saying that you don't know how to read, because I said "in terms of baseball" not your happiness in general.
And here is to argue with the other thing you said:
Team (Years) W-L WP Pennants-WS Champs
Chicago Cubs (1876-2007) 9985-9459 0.514 16-2
Chicago White Sox (1901-2007) 8372-8182 0.506 6-3
I think statistical data ONLY between the White Sox and Cubs would disagree. Way more pennants and a better winning percentage for the Cubs, the only advantage the Sox have is WS wins and they only have the advantage by a single one. You lose. Your a moron, do us all a favor and stop voicing your opinion, because they are not only annoying, but usually wrong and you have sunk to the point of zero credibility. I am amused by your stupidity though, that's the only reason I don't think you should stop posting.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 02:52 PM
Ugh, this website is weird, my name only shows up sometimes...
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 02:53 PM
Ugh, this website is weird, my name only shows up sometimes...This is CubsFan1654. I was the one who posted those three posts in response to yours where i said marmol is just good and the cubs lineup one where i say i think Kos-K should bat 2.
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 02:54 PM
and the post above about the Cubs vs Sox all time stats.
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 02:55 PM
"just looked at teahens stats...
why dont the cubs pursue him instead of spending 50 mil on fukudome. they are very similar players.
any thoughts?"
If we knew that Teahen would hit like he did his 2nd year then the Cubs probably would go after him, but from his 1st and 3rd year stats that 18hr short year in 06 looks like he over performed a bit. I think the Cubs are betting that Kos-K has a higher power ceiling than the 7 jacks Teahen has hit in 2 of his 3 seasons. It's weird that Teahen's most impressive numbers came in a short year while his two mostly full years (rookie numbers you just don't know so don't know if we should consider them as telling as the other two years) his stats weren't nearly as good.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 03:02 PM
"If cubs sign him they still need pitching.. the white sox would be a great team, him and J-Dye next to each other would be great...KC is brutal they can sign a-rod and they would still suck"
You should post less, seriously. KC is not that bad - they're better than the White Sox with a much less payroll, tool. As far as the Cubs needing pitching, I didn't know being 2nd in the league in pretty much every important pitching stat and leading the majors in K's for like the 8th straight year meant you needed pitching.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 03:32 PM
"You should post less, seriously. KC is not that bad - they're better than the White Sox with a much less payroll, tool. As far as the Cubs needing pitching, I didn't know being 2nd in the league in pretty much every important pitching stat and leading the majors in K's for like the 8th straight year meant you needed pitching."
Hmm, call me crazy but I think 72-90 is better than 69-93, so I'm not sure wher you are getting your ideas from unless you have a crystal ball where you can foresee baseball standings for the next year.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 03:40 PM
"I didn't know being 2nd in the league in pretty much every important pitching stat and leading the majors in K's for like the 8th straight year meant you needed pitching."
LOL yeah 2nd in the NL with a team era in the 4's, in the NATIONAL LEAGUE. LOL no matter how you slice it that is not good, congratulations at being at the top of a leauge of obvious mediocrity. That's like being the smartest kid with downs syndrome.
..and don't even try to compare it to the AL because they have that whole thing called the designated hitter and it usually has an affect on the pitching stats as result.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 03:50 PM
"LOL yeah 2nd in the NL with a team era in the 4's, in the NATIONAL LEAGUE."
Are you joking me? Way to make yourself lose all credibility that you once might have had. Thats just something a retard would say. I guess an ERA that ranks 6th in ALL OF BASEBALL is just bad then, huh? Hey, how was your offense last year???
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 03:57 PM
I know facts are the last thing some of you want on see, but the Cubs pitching staff was 4th in baseball in earned runs allowed. The only staffs that were better were SD, Bos and Toronto. I'm just correcting the ignorant.
Posted by: cachhubguy | December 11, 2007 at 03:58 PM
Not to mention the fact that Bill James projects them to be right around there yet again next year....but like I said earlier...
Who likes facts and projections anyway?
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 04:09 PM
"Hmm, call me crazy but I think 72-90 is better than 69-93, so I'm not sure wher you are getting your ideas from unless you have a crystal ball where you can foresee baseball standings for the next year."
Considering you noted that they would get A-Rod and still blow, I'm pretty sure they'd blow them out of the water, and even if they didn't, they'd still be better. lmao@White Sox fans, its like they don't realize they're the JOKE of baseball right now.
Posted by: Game555 | December 11, 2007 at 04:14 PM
please explain how the white sox are the joke of baseball right now.... id like to hear your opinion because if its because they didnt get ALL the players they targeted this offseason, then there is about 29 other jokes out there.
Posted by: trober81 | December 11, 2007 at 04:52 PM
They're a joke because factoring in expectations + payroll along with record they were the worst team in the MLB last year.
Posted by: Game555 | December 11, 2007 at 04:53 PM
Look...I'm a Cubs fan..but I actually root for the Sox in the AL. I don't really understand the hatred between the fans...never really have. I have happy for the Sox. There are fans that are going to ruin it, and thats what everyone here seems to be doing. The sox fans here are being ridiculous, and the Cubs fans in the other thread were out of control. Just keep it to facts and hot stove talk and don't throw things out there like being 4th in baseball in ERA makes you a terrible pitching staff. You just lose every ounce of credibility, if you ever had any at all.
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 04:58 PM
"I have happy for the Sox"
Wow...what a sentence I made! It was supposed to say I have been happy for the Sox (WS)
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 11, 2007 at 04:58 PM
You know, its so funny that every single time the Cubs are mentioned on this board there is a fight. Really, every single time… You don’t see this happen between Dodgers/Giants/Padres/DBacks/Rockies fans... You don’t see this between Indians/WhiteSox, or White/Sox, or Indians/Twins or the Tigers replacing any one of those… You don’t see it with Angels/A’s/Rangers/M’s fans... You don’t see it in Mets/Phillies/Braves threads… Doesn’t show up between Cards/Brewers/Rats/Reds/Stros fanes… You don’t even see it with any of the AL-E teams other than the Yanks VS BoSox bickering… Yet every time the Cubs are mentioned there is a problem! Wonder why that is; I guess it really must be all the other 29 teams fans, huh… :\
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 05:36 PM
If you go back to the top of this post you will see why it always turns into a fight. Because someone always starts taking shots. The first one is by someone who doesn't identify themselves. Is it you? The first shot was hoping they would sign him to a STUPID contract like Soriano. Then the same person takes another shot. "The Cubs will not contend with that GOD awful rotation. Then Trober jumps in with his shot. So I don't know if you are a Sox fan "anonymous" but my guess would be yes. I know Trober is. The answer is, because Sox fans can't resist taking shots every chance they get. And Cub fans will give it right back.
Posted by: | December 11, 2007 at 06:01 PM
No the reason is just that since it is the Cubs everyone loves to take advantage of all the potential low blows. It gets annoying having to defend the Cubs every time some moron comes in to just pick on us because they havent won a series in a while. It's almost like any time that a team is going through some tough times the fans of those teams find it very convenient to have one team they can vent against, that happens to be the Cubs. It's just funny that the Cubs can win a division and still get told by other teams fans that they suck more than any other team even when you have teams like the Rays, Royals, Pirates, Nats, Marlins, White Sox this year, the list goes on of teams you could pick to attack but the habbit is to pick the Cubs, and they will be a target until they finally break through with that World Series win, whenever it may come. Another thing is that I honestly believe there is no greater hatred, in American sports at least, than the White Sox fans towards the Cubs, yeah, even greater than Bears-Packers, Sox-Yanks, OSU-Mich, and so on. The worst part about it is that that level of hatred is, for the most part, a one way street. Sure most of us dislike the Sox, but our happiness isn't at all based on their success or failure. We care about OUR teams success, not other teams failures. For the majority of White Sox fans, at least the outspoken ones, their happiness correlates directly with the success or failure of the Cubs. I'm not saying that all of them are because I know they all don't, having friends who are White Sox fans who don't hate the Cubs at all, but for most of them it's like any time they see anything that could be a good thing for the Cubs, they have a fit and flip out and are very outgoing with their hatred. From self experience, we Cubs fans have the worst attitude in baseball towards our team because we are used to failure, but we are pretty knowledgeable and friendly. Don't even consider counting the drunk morons in the bleachers because they aren't fans, they just come for the good times. I would assume that most people who actually register to a place like this and post are real fans, and most of us are nice, so I don't think that it is us who cause the problems.
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 06:03 PM
Remember when the Fukudome talks started and involved the Cubs as suitors? Im not sure when that was but I am pretty sure that no one was throwing these crazy $14-16 mill a year around as what it would take to get him.
Its a decent risk for 3/36 or even 4/50 but any more than that seems like too big of a gamble for someone that wasn't even putting up numbers close to Ichiro was before he came to MLB. For every Nomo there's a Hideki Irabu. For every Godzilla Matsui there's a Spaz Matsui. Dice-K there is a Kei Igawa.
Right now from limited exposure and past players I dont see Fukudome being one end of those spectrums to another. He's not gonna be a superstar(many will debate such status for Dice-K thus far) but he's not gonna be an enormous bust.
As a Cubs fan I hope we get him for a reasonable price and he gives us an improvement over Jacque/Floyd/Murton/Ward options we had last season.
For some reason I keep wanting to think he's gonna translate to a Akinori Iwamura conversion for MLB(and now I go back and calculate the averages and see they are pretty similar)
Iwamura's Jap Career Avg
.300 BA, 23.5HR, 71.3 RBI
compare that to
Fukudome's Jap Career AVG
.305 BA, 21.3HR, 71.8 RBI
Iwamura's MLB 1st Season
.285 BA, 7HR, 77 RBI
Fukudome's MLB 1st Season
?????????????
Take into account the fact that he had only 490 AB's last year for TB, where as 5 out of the last 6 seasons he played in Japan he had more at bats than 490.
2001-18 HR, 81RBI = 520 AB
2002-23 HR, 71RBI = 510 AB
2003- only 232 AB's
2004-44 HR, 103RBI = 533 AB
2005-30 HR, 102RBI = 548 AB
2006-32 HR, 77 RBI = 615 AB
Posted by: Gleebo | December 11, 2007 at 06:17 PM
"Remember when the Fukudome talks started and involved the Cubs as suitors? Im not sure when that was but I am pretty sure that no one was throwing these crazy $14-16 mill a year around as what it would take to get him."
This happened with Dice-K and will start to happen with anyone who comes from Japan who has any chance of being a legit player over here. Go back to last year when at first I recall people thinking 25-30 millionish would be enough for the posting fee. Basically when it comes to Japanese players in the future, anytime that the player is pretty good take the original estimates and multiply it by 1.5-2 times and thats about what it will really cost. These guys better be something special because I think it's nonsense to pay unproven players this much. Honestly I don't think Japanese numbers are even as reliable as AAA numbers anymore, you just can't tell.
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 06:48 PM
"Iwamura's MLB 1st Season
.285 BA, 7HR, 77 RBI"
Iwamura only had 34 RBI for the Rays last year.
I think Fukudome will be similar to Iwamura but with superior power, posting a line of something like 15 HR, 80 RBI, 295/370/440, which is quality production but also not worth $15-16M a year.
Does anyone know why Iwamura got 3 years and $7.7M and Fukudome will get something like 4 years and $50M even though their numbers are fairly similar?
Posted by: scribbletone | December 11, 2007 at 06:53 PM
Well its almost 11:00 in the morining in Japan. I think its time for Fukudome to announce he is coming to Chicago.
Posted by: uww1 | December 11, 2007 at 07:20 PM
"Iwamura's MLB 1st Season
.285 BA, 7HR, 77 RBI"
34 RBI not 77, in 491 AB
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 07:42 PM
"Does anyone know why Iwamura got 3 years and $7.7M and Fukudome will get something like 4 years and $50M even though their numbers are fairly similar?"
If you watch videos of them Fukudome looks like he has more of a real power hitters swing. Iwamura hit a lot of low line drive home runs, Fukudome hits towering blasts, he's a more legit power threat
Posted by: CubsFan1654 | December 11, 2007 at 07:46 PM