![]() |
|
|
| |
« The Mahay Market | Main | Teams Interested In Luis Gonzalez »
UPDATE, 12-5-07 at 5:45pm: Billy Beane, who rarely comments on trade rumors, actually went out of his way to call mine below a "total fabrication." I guess I should be proud, right? I was the subject of an elaborate hoax/impersonated sportswriter (thanks, Fake John Delcos!). I apologize - not sure why someone would go to such lengths, but lesson learned.
FROM 12-5-07 at 3:36pm:
Just got an incredible rumor from a trusted New York sportswriter. Stay with me, because this one's crazy. But rest assured that if the source wasn't good, I wouldn't post it.
Minnesota has initiated talks for a three-way blockbuster with the Twins and A's. Here's how it would go down:
Mets send Jose Reyes, Kevin Mulvey to A's
Mets send Hector Pellot to Twins
A's send Bobby Crosby and Dan Johnson to Mets
A's send Dan Haren to Twins
Twins send Johan Santana to Mets
Mets get Johan Santana, Bobby Crosby and Dan Johnson
A's get Jose Reyes and Kevin Mulvey
Twins get Dan Haren and Hector Pellot
The source says Haren is exactly the type of player the Twins want for Santana, a cheap frontline starter. It's known the Mets would hate to deal Reyes but they would get some value beyond Santana. Billy Beane is happy because he gets Reyes for one more year than he had Haren plus longtime favorite Mulvey. And, he's out of Crosby's contract.
Thoughts?
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534b3a784970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Santana/Reyes/Haren Rumor Quashed:


|
|
Holy crap.
Posted by: wayne gomes | December 05, 2007 at 03:39 PM
Thinking about how difficult the Johan moves have been so far...
This is just way to complicated to get done.
Posted by: MrTruman | December 05, 2007 at 03:40 PM
seems like it works on all sides.... talk about a blockbuster.
Posted by: jclay | December 05, 2007 at 03:40 PM
WOW.... Please, get Johan out of the AL.... :)
Posted by: royalsfaninmarinertown | December 05, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Is this deal definitively better for the Twins than the other offers being bandied about? I bet Twins fans would like it better
Posted by: wayne gomes | December 05, 2007 at 03:40 PM
That would give the NL East to the Mets. Who would they start at SS.
Posted by: Land-Man | December 05, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Wow!!
I don't know where to begin
Posted by: Yishbania | December 05, 2007 at 03:40 PM
Nonsense.
Posted by: ArodSucksAtLife | December 05, 2007 at 03:41 PM
This doesn't sound right
Posted by: twinsfan20 | December 05, 2007 at 03:41 PM
ya like Mr Truman said, this is a far to difficult trade for the Twins to work out. They clearly cant work with 1 team nevermind a 3 way deal.
Posted by: crunch17 | December 05, 2007 at 03:41 PM
WHA..?
anyone have a schematic?
Posted by: levelboss | December 05, 2007 at 03:41 PM
I call shenanigans.
Though it'd be fun to see.
Posted by: JerseyMuscle17 | December 05, 2007 at 03:42 PM
I just can't see Minnesota making this deal happen. We trade the best pitcher in baseball for another pitcher who we'll have to deal with similarly in 2-3 years? Really?
How is this a better deal than getting Hughes, Melky, and other prospects? There's just not enough upside for MN here.
Posted by: adg1034 | December 05, 2007 at 03:42 PM
Wow.. wow. Don't see the point of the Mets getting Dan Johnson, but if they land Johan and Crosby then it's well worth taking an extra low batting average 1B.
Posted by: DRayDude | December 05, 2007 at 03:43 PM
that is nuts!
i wouldn't mind it happening because 1)the angels dont have to face haren a lot anymore, and 2)the angels dont have to worry about santana in the postseason with the BoSox.
hahaha
the deal seems pretty fair, but i don't know if the mets would actually trade Reyes
Posted by: bseballcrzy17 | December 05, 2007 at 03:43 PM
I agree there just isn't enough in it for MN if they do it, they get nobody to fill the void at SS an CF
Posted by: twinsfan20 | December 05, 2007 at 03:44 PM
Wow, That... looks fair on all fronts... wow. I don't even know what to say, except... I really hope that DOES happen. That would trump the Cabrera/Willis deal as the most incredible trade this offseason. I don't think anything would top it, either.
Posted by: metafrantic | December 05, 2007 at 03:44 PM
sounds like a crazy a$$ rumor and thats about it
Posted by: Go Tribe | December 05, 2007 at 03:44 PM
That wouldnt make the Twins any better for the future.
Getting an often injured pitcher and a propect for one of the, if not the best pitcher in the game.
Hughes,Melky,Cano is a better combo then Haren + Pellot.
Its a fun idea to think about but i just dont see it happening. But this has been one active and strage off season already so anything can happen.
Posted by: Ignignokt1 | December 05, 2007 at 03:44 PM
This one makes my brain hurt for at least a couple reasons: 1) who even thought of this? I need a flowchart just to understand it all. 2) Why would the Twins bother with Haren, when they could net several prospects and prepare for '09 and '10? They don't have a shot against the Tigers anymore, and they never had a shot at the Indians, Haren or not.
Posted by: FineHamAbounds | December 05, 2007 at 03:45 PM
seems to me the twins get the shaft here. it's virtually straight up santana for haren. And how do the Mets go from having to include reyes among others to get santana to now ending up with him and 2 legitimate mlb players. must be more to it or just one waiting to be debunked
Posted by: jimmie | December 05, 2007 at 03:45 PM
I think the A's would need a bit better deal. Possibly a low level prospect from the Twins.
Posted by: Grant77 | December 05, 2007 at 03:45 PM
Looks like win/win/win to me.
Mets find an okay replacement for SS in Crosby (better than the FA market, thank god my team hurried up and scooped up Cesar Izturis before the swarm got to him).
Posted by: CarpeDiem | December 05, 2007 at 03:46 PM
it was Cano or Hughes not both in the same deal...and it was mainly jsut Hughes
Posted by: Larsen101 | December 05, 2007 at 03:47 PM
i doubt this very much. ill believe it when i see it
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 03:47 PM
that would be insane but yeah if the twins want Reyes that bad then why is it that he ends up on the A's?
Posted by: AnteaterPadre | December 05, 2007 at 03:47 PM
Wait what?
So they just traded a 28 year old Santana for a 27 year old Haren and some A ball prospect?
How does that make any sense?
If they were getting Reyes I'd understand, but... they're not.
They'll have to go through the same crap all over again when Haren hits 30. Unless they're flipping him immediately.
Posted by: henry14theking | December 05, 2007 at 03:47 PM
I as a Mets fan, would do this... to answer someone's question, the Mets would probably sign David Eckstein as their SS...
but the Twins have wanted Reyes themselves, why would they agree to a trade that sends Reyes to another AL team? They would need more prospects then Pellot, and would need more than two players all together...
this is a steal for the mets... two players for johan? PIPE DREAM
Posted by: NyMets85 | December 05, 2007 at 03:48 PM
I think the Mets make out like bandits in this deal. Something seems off about this trade rumor..
Posted by: DRayDude | December 05, 2007 at 03:48 PM
I don't see this one happening. I suspect the the Twins realize that they aren't getting enough.
Posted by: Rob Tyson | December 05, 2007 at 03:48 PM
"I think the A's would need a bit better deal. Possibly a low level prospect from the Twins."
I hope that was sarcastic because if anything the A's should be giving at least two prospects for Johan he's ten times better than Haren
Posted by: twinsfan20 | December 05, 2007 at 03:48 PM
There is no way the Twins could accept this trade it really does not help the team out in the future with young players in positions that are needed. Unless they planned to turn around and trade Haren off for those other players.
Posted by: bgigs52 | December 05, 2007 at 03:49 PM
Time, I think you got something wrong there: You have Pellot going frmo the Mets to the A's but then the Twins end up with him...
Posted by: metafrantic | December 05, 2007 at 03:49 PM
The Twins can't get one team to deal with them so why not get three? This trade makes little to no sense now if the Twins get Haren and Gomez to play center i could imagine it being more fair.
Posted by: justdeal | December 05, 2007 at 03:49 PM
Hmmm....
Is the writer who came up with this deal possibly intoxicated?
Posted by: tolo316 | December 05, 2007 at 03:50 PM
ya i dont see this happening either lol...gezz Tim u thought 297 posts or watever was yesterday ..just wait till the day is over for this post ...
Posted by: Larsen101 | December 05, 2007 at 03:50 PM
If this is remotely true, there have to be more prospects going to the Twins.
No way SMith settles for Haren + A ball prospect when Lester/Crisp/Lowrie/Masterson is on the table.
Posted by: henry14theking | December 05, 2007 at 03:50 PM
Yeah, the offer from the Sox and the Yanks was better for Min...
Posted by: Dave | December 05, 2007 at 03:50 PM
Can't see this one happening. Wouldn't the Twins want more then that.
Posted by: kdub | December 05, 2007 at 03:51 PM
why would the twins care to do a 3 team trade when they can be selfish and get 4-5 players for one guy? this stinks, especially after the twins organization said they arent close to anything yet
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 03:52 PM
DC Comics sends Batman, Wonder Woman, and Aquaman to Dark Horse Comics
Dark Horse sends Alien Vs Predator and Blade to DC
DC sends the Green Lantern to Marvel
Marvel sends Spiderman to DC Comics
Posted by: levelboss | December 05, 2007 at 03:52 PM
I think this deal makes a lot of sense. For the Mets, they get the Ace that they've been looking for, the A's get a stud SS Reyes, and the Twins get affordable Haren to replace Johan. Having Dan Haren & Lirano wouldn't be too shabby. I believe this blockbuster deal (if true) would make a lot of sense for all parties involved.
Posted by: djcaliber | December 05, 2007 at 03:52 PM
Makes more sense if Crosby goes to Minnesota to me. Otherwise the Twins are getting hosed.
Posted by: DRayDude | December 05, 2007 at 03:52 PM
Well, that's one way to get Jose Reyes to improve his walk-rate and plate discipline, by sending him to Oakland.
The wild card in this trade in Crosby. If he can actually get himself healthy and return to the kind of form that was expected of him when he came up, the deal is potentially HUGE for the Mets, despite giving up Reyes.
Johnson is a low-cost alternative to Delgado, who's just about done.
I'd be surprised if Minnesota would be happy to get essentially "just" Haren, while serving as the facilitator between Oakland and New York. Seems like their bounty should be higher for such a role. Reyes and Santana moving through them is a swap of two of the potentially-best players of their generation at their respective positions.
Is this one actually serious? How long are the legs on this rumour? Curious to see how it fleshes out.
Posted by: Sunny Reiser | December 05, 2007 at 03:53 PM
yes, this can't happen unless the Twins are getting more. It doesn't make any sense...
Posted by: Aduncaroo | December 05, 2007 at 03:54 PM
marvel is getting screwed on the spiderman trade lol
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 03:54 PM
If the Twins can somehow unload Juan Rincon in this deal, I'd say go for it!
Posted by: Glanzer | December 05, 2007 at 03:54 PM
Total rip-off for the twins
Posted by: laftw | December 05, 2007 at 03:54 PM
I think this is a ploy to try and get the Sox to raise their offer. Twins lose more in this deal than the Red Sox deal.
Posted by: bosox1838 | December 05, 2007 at 03:54 PM
Also...
Why wouldn't the Mets just trade Reyes + prospects for Santana + Brandon Harris (The Rays prospect sent over).
Why bother getting Beane involved?
Posted by: henry14theking | December 05, 2007 at 03:54 PM
I have to think this is total BS.
Posted by: aGIANTfan | December 05, 2007 at 03:54 PM
If the Mets added Gomez to Minnesota and Humber to Oakland somehow...or something.
I don't see Minnesota going for this...they definitely need more or they should take the Sox offer or Hughes. Haren would not be as successful pitching in the Homerdome against Det, Cle and Chicago and w/out knowing much about him other then the #'s...Pellet looks like he is about 4 years away
Posted by: Jared78 | December 05, 2007 at 03:55 PM
Surprisingly, this trusted writer is from New York ...
Twins don't come out ahead in this deal. I would take Hughes + prospects over Haren.
Also, how does this make sense for the A's? They sell off Haren and are still talking about moving Blanton. They need to rebuild to make a run in 09/10. Having Reyes at SS today does nothing for them. Only thing I can think of is that they will then flip Reyes for other young talent.
Having the A's in the deal just complicates things. If the core is really Johan for Reyes then the Mets and the Twins just need to work together.
Posted by: bjsguess | December 05, 2007 at 03:56 PM
@ Ignignokt1
Haren an oft-injured pitcher? You must be thinking of Rich Harden... not Dan Haren.
The twins sending Santana for an elite pitcher with 3 years left for cheap as he enters his prime seems like enough in return. The A's get their answer at SS and get to rid themselves of Crosby and Johnson while getting a good pitching prospect to boot. The Mets get the best pitcher in baseball + a replacement SS and a pinch hitter/backup 1B. Seems fair on all side to me.
Posted by: jclay | December 05, 2007 at 03:56 PM
I don't buy the Mets tradin Reyes in any scenario.
Posted by: J.L. | December 05, 2007 at 03:56 PM
I think the main problem here is that it implies the Twins would want Haren over Reyes which seems quite unlikely. I would also be skeptical Beane would value Reyes as high as other GMs.
Posted by: walkoffblast | December 05, 2007 at 03:57 PM
Getting Johan Santana would be just the push the Mets need to get into the playoffs; but can the acquisition of Santana offset the loss of Reyes? I don't know that he could. Jose Reyes has been an integral part of the Mets team over the past few seasons. There is no way that the Mets will not feel the loss of a guy like Reyes. Crosby cannot compare to a player as dynamic as Jose Reyes.
I am all for a 3-way deal of this type, but I cannot see the Mets giving up Reyes. This deal could go through, but the Mets will need to part with prospects rather than all-stars.
Posted by: joekiltens | December 05, 2007 at 03:57 PM
Wow, I'd cry if Reyes was gone but we'd get back Santana and Dan Johnson and Crosby.. they could be shopped elsewhere? to the O's with Pelfrey, Humber and maybe another younger kid for Bedard/Tejada? :D I'd even throw in Maine if absolutely needed, or Heilman
Posted by: BaLLooNNoT | December 05, 2007 at 03:57 PM
Since when is Dan Haren an elite pitcher? He had 1 very good year, he is not elite.
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | December 05, 2007 at 03:57 PM
the twins better stop trying to test the sox patients, one of these times after all these attempts to raise the price they might walk away because it shows they really arent serious about a trade unless its for john henrys (sox owner) first born son
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 03:57 PM
i agree, 04forever.. Marvel shouldn't trade Spiderman
for The Green Lantern? Heck no!
Posted by: levelboss | December 05, 2007 at 03:57 PM
dude, marvel makes oout way better on that one, no way DC does that
Posted by: jimmie | December 05, 2007 at 03:58 PM
The A's get ripped. They give up their SS, best SP and backup 1B for a SS and a decent pitching prospect, without really clearing any salary. They would want more.
Posted by: JD | December 05, 2007 at 03:58 PM
As that is structured in the rumor, the A's would be giving up too much for too little in return. They deal their ace and an all star caliber SS for an all star SS and a minor prospect?
There might be truth to that rumor but I think it's not quite as discussed here yet.
Posted by: hemingways | December 05, 2007 at 03:59 PM
spiderman for the lantern in a striaght trade, are you crazy?!
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 04:00 PM
How ironic that this deal - clearly invented by a NEW YORK writer while playing MLB: The Show 2007 on Playstation 3 - works out best for the Mets?
Posted by: tolo316 | December 05, 2007 at 04:00 PM
Tim
This will be the most commented on post you will ever have.
Posted by: Yishbania | December 05, 2007 at 04:00 PM
are you high, jimmie? for Spiderman, Marvel better get at least Superman from DC or no deal
who's Spidey's agent? Scott Boras?
Posted by: levelboss | December 05, 2007 at 04:01 PM
My thoughts exactly JL, the reason the A's are shopping Haren is because thier current team most likely won't be able to compete with the current Angels for at least a couple years, so they sell Haren high so that the prospects they get in return come along around 09/10 (when haren would come off the books)...
getting reyes to rot in oakland makes no sense from their standpoint, NOT THAT ANYONE WOULD REFUSE REYES, but strategically for the A's it's swapping out essentially an extra contract year, we know the A's would never be able to sign Reyes in a contract year. so tihs seems kinda off balance
Posted by: rgd1227 | December 05, 2007 at 04:01 PM
@gobosox
go watch haren pitch....
Posted by: jclay | December 05, 2007 at 04:01 PM
UPDATE, 12-5-07 at 7:12pm: An undisclosed source within Minnesota's front office reportedly says no talks have been discussed about a 3 way deal.
Posted by: crunch17 | December 05, 2007 at 04:01 PM
Tim
This will be the most commented on post you will ever have.
Posted by: Yishbania | December 05, 2007 at 04:02 PM
Haren and a Low A light hitting 2nd base prospect for Santana. COME ON NOW. Twins could get more from the Sox and Spanks
Posted by: AngryTick | December 05, 2007 at 04:02 PM
the fact that this writer that put this trade out is from new york makes alot of sense. its new yorks way of raising the price for the sox without having to be involved themselves, pretty genious, to bad the deal sucked, it might have worked, had me going at first
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 04:03 PM
My thoughts exactly JL, the reason the A's are shopping Haren is because thier current team most likely won't be able to compete with the current Angels for at least a couple years, so they sell Haren high so that the prospects they get in return come along around 09/10 (when haren would come off the books)...
getting reyes to rot in oakland makes no sense from their standpoint, NOT THAT ANYONE WOULD REFUSE REYES, but strategically for the A's it's swapping out essentially an extra contract year, we know the A's would never be able to sign Reyes in a contract year. so tihs seems kinda off balance
Posted by: rgd1227 | December 05, 2007 at 04:03 PM
The Twins are not just trying to raise the price for the Red Sox. They don't like the Sox offer and are therefore seeing if they can get a better one somewhere else.
Posted by: MikeTwins | December 05, 2007 at 04:03 PM
Billy Beane called and he says LOL
Posted by: crunch17 | December 05, 2007 at 04:04 PM
@jclay
his numbers do not justify calling him an elite pitcher.He had 1 very good year, albeit in a pitchers haven. You're too quick to give him elite status.
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | December 05, 2007 at 04:04 PM
AWESOME deal! Now let's see if it gets done. I'm starting to think Santana might not get dealt lol.
Posted by: BaySick | December 05, 2007 at 04:05 PM
If the Twins wouldn't trade Santana for Hughes + Cabrera + 1 then there is no WAY they'd do this. Hughes is more valuable to them then Haren at his point and Cabrera (and probably the +1) would both individually be worth more then Pellot. I also think the A's would be getting screwed here. Not surprised that this comes from a NY sportswriter.
Posted by: SL__72 | December 05, 2007 at 04:05 PM
I dont know how you argue the A's are getting screwed.
Thats a fine return for Haren, no one was going to meet Beanes ridiculous asking price anyways.
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | December 05, 2007 at 04:06 PM
Minaya is not going to give up Reyes. Might as well put Dave Wright in the rumor as well.
However, there hasn't been any movement with the Red Sox/Minnesota deal, so anything could be possible.
Posted by: okojo | December 05, 2007 at 04:06 PM
this is a bad bad bad idea. Crosby and Johnson suck period. Pellot is a good prospect and Mulvey is one of our better pitching prospects... This idea is TERRIBLE
Posted by: nycdego | December 05, 2007 at 04:06 PM
levelboss:
lol, that must be it, except boras must be lanterns agent, since he is the lesser player and asking for alot more then he could ever get unless he was boras client
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 04:06 PM
WFAN in New York is reporting RIGHT NOW that they and SI.com's Jon Heyman say that "...the Mets remain aggressive in pursuit of Johan Santana, but WON'T part with either Jose Reyes or David Wright" in such a deal.
Knew this one smelled like dogs%*t.
Posted by: Sunny Reiser | December 05, 2007 at 04:06 PM
This sounds like an awful deal for the Twins, unless somehow Reyes is coming their way I don't see this happening. Or at least getting Haren and Carlos Gomez, but there has to be something more than just getting Haren in exchange for Santana
Posted by: akbtwins5 | December 05, 2007 at 04:06 PM
Is it April 1st?
Posted by: Bleacher_Buddha | December 05, 2007 at 04:06 PM
I do not know If I like this deal if I am the Mets.
giving up a core member of your team and one of your franchise players? Mulvey is a great prospect the one all the GMs want. I do not think Crosby has much value (injuries and an over inflated contract). Dan Johnson is mediocore at best.
Remeber it is not aquestion of replacing just a Short Stop here if Reyes is traded. It is replacing a dominate lead-off man and a team spark plug.
Posted by: vader2112 | December 05, 2007 at 04:07 PM
nevermind that Santana would probably veto this deal, lets not forget that
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 04:07 PM
I don't even know what to think. I can't see the Twins doing this unless they plan on flipping Haren somehow. They do not fill any of the holes they have with this trade. Give the Twins a CF, SS, or 3B in addition and then it would make some sense.
Posted by: inhonorof34 | December 05, 2007 at 04:07 PM
I dont know how you argue the A's are getting screwed.
Thats a fine return for Haren, no one was going to meet Beanes ridiculous asking price anyways.
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | December 05, 2007 at 04:07 PM
Either way you look at it, Dark horse wins anyway. Just eliminate them and DC/Marvel can work something out between the two of them. This third team thing always fouls it up for someone else.
Posted by: jimmie | December 05, 2007 at 04:08 PM
I think getting Santana out of the AL and into the NL would be a plus for the Twins. Obviously, they would not have to face him for the next 7+ years? Also, I think some of you are underestimating Dan Haren. He's an AL pitcher who posted a 3.07 ERA last season AND has a very reasonable contract. A rotation of Haren & Liriano (if healthy) would be pretty darn good, don't you think?
Posted by: djcaliber | December 05, 2007 at 04:09 PM
People, please stop saying that you "would definitely take Hughes + co. or Cano + co."
Those deals are, according to many sources, off the table. I'm not saying that this is their best deal, but the Yankees deals are DEAD and the Sox talks are dying.
FWIW, I don't think this is the deal. I could see:
Jose Reyes + Mulvey to A's
Johan and Crosby to Mets
Haren + Johnson + Pellot to Twins.
Posted by: doktoruber | December 05, 2007 at 04:09 PM
@bosox
he pitched well in the postseason in '04 and '06. Top 10 in AL in K's 3 years running, IP 3 years running, K:BB 3 years running, and WHIP 2 years running. Has consistently improved his performance every year, and is just entering his prime now at 27. This year his stats were fantastic on the worst team he's ever been on.
Watch him pitch and you'll realize he is a workhorse #1 pitcher.... he is a top 10 pitcher in baseball.
Posted by: jclay | December 05, 2007 at 04:10 PM
As a Phillies fan, all I have to say is "Holy crap."
Posted by: savenhl | December 05, 2007 at 04:10 PM
As this deal stands right now, no way it will happen. Twins are getting the shaft.
Posted by: BIGHURT35 | December 05, 2007 at 04:11 PM
this post is going to get out of control....
Posted by: 04Forever | December 05, 2007 at 04:11 PM
I'm with adg1034 on this one. I don't see Minnesota pulling the trigger on this one. Why trade Santana for what is, in essence, a 1-for-1 deal that would bring Haren to Minnesota. Santana is no doubt better than Haren, albeit marginally, and Haren is cheaper and more controllable. But again, why would the Twins make what seems to be an even 1-for-1 swap when they could have their choice of handfuls of prospects, which include pitchers like Lester, Hughes, etc.? I don't see this happening.
Posted by: sugarshane024 | December 05, 2007 at 04:11 PM
@doktoruber
How the hell are the a's getting the best return here?
Posted by: GoBoSox420 | December 05, 2007 at 04:11 PM