![]() |
|
|
| |
« Church As Part Of A Santana Deal? | Main | Projecting Clay Buchholz »
I've got some more info from the same source that told me about Boston's interest in Brad Wilkerson.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c7742d970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Brad Wilkerson Rumors:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Hey Tim, if the Mets do trade Church in the deal for Santana wouldn't they be interested in Wilkerson as well because they will have nobody playing RF.
I don't consider Gomez as MLB ready so in my opinion it is either Pagan, Wilkerson or Sammy Sosa playing in RF for the Mets.
Posted by: pvhornet05 | January 24, 2008 at 10:53 AM
Or a platoon of Easley and Nady or Green, which would destroy anything the above players could do.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | January 24, 2008 at 10:56 AM
Wilkerson is going to be a really nice signing for some team. Makes sense that Epstein is in on him.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | January 24, 2008 at 11:21 AM
Wilkerson was good from 02-04, but has been trash since, putting up OPS+ of 103, 86, and 104 last year.
Posted by: JerseyMetFan | January 24, 2008 at 11:27 AM
If trash is a 104, what does that make your current options?? If u make a santana trade
Posted by: Aduncaroo | January 24, 2008 at 01:07 PM
OPS is deceptive because it double counts batting average(and therefore double penalizes a low average). His walk and power rates have both remained solid so if he can just get the AVG back up to .250-.260 he'll be a productive player again. Talent is still there.
Posted by: Not Joe Morgan | January 24, 2008 at 01:40 PM
Spose the Mets could get in on that, but I haven't heard anything of that nature.
Posted by: Tim Dierkes | January 24, 2008 at 02:15 PM