MLB Rumors - MLB Trade Rumors
Subscribe to MLB Trade Rumors using RSS
Home     Contact     About     Advertise     Archives     Widget     Twitter      RSS Usage

« Cubs Still Discussing Roberts | Main | Brad Wilkerson Rumors »

Church As Part Of A Santana Deal?

Michael Silverman of the Boston Herald has some info on a Johan Santana possibility, and it isn't the usual rehashed stuff.  He writes:

A package the Twins could receive will probably not include both of the Mets’ top outfield prospects, Carlos Gomez and Fernando Martinez. There are indications that Martinez would be in the deal, along with major league outfielder Ryan Church and at least two other prospects. Starter Mike Pelfrey could be part of the deal as well....

Would Martinez, Deolis Guerra, Kevin Mulvey, and Church get it done?  Maybe not a fan-pleaser but you'd have guys who can contribute now and others that can develop into superstars.  Would Michael Cuddyer still be a center field candidate if the Twins acquire Church?


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e2010534c77822970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Church As Part Of A Santana Deal?:

Comments

Yikes... I'm not sure what I think about replacing Gomez with Church.

On one hand, it would be great to hold on to a young talent like Gomez, but he is FAR from being ready for an everyday MLB job.

Who takes over for Church in RF if he's dealt? Is Omar considering re-signing Green? I wouldn't be against that... the guy still handles RHP well. (.326 BA / .865 OPS last year)

That sounds like a 'fair' deal. It's not gonna wow the Twins, but it could get it done.

Church could play center for the Twins if they wanted to put Cuddyer in the corner, and he'd do well, but I have to say that I think the Twins would be silly to go for this deal.

The package doesn't include enough pitching.

It would also be sad for Church who is primed to do good things in NY if given a regular starting job. He'd be lost in Minnesota.

If Church is the missing piece that can get this done im confused.
I still think that coco crisp is a much better player than Church

Cuddyer is definitely NOT a CF. he's a RF for sure. either church or delmon young would have to play center.

but i do agree that this deal needs more another pitching prospect, so the twins can move a couple of their own for a major league pitcher.

Coco much better than Church?

Coco has a career 94 OPS+.

Church has a 113.

It's not like the guy has a lead glove. He's got solid OF defense.

Who do the Mets get to take over for Church? Gomez may not be ready. Maybe sign Mench? Nixon? Green and Gonzo are still out there and of course, Bonds.

Sox bias aside, I agree with JerseyMetFan... Church is at the top of the list of extremely underrated players.

Church's numbers compare very favorably to Aaron Rowand's, and he's actually a year younger.

A Mench/Green platoon would be awesome.

Mench has a career .924 OPS against lefties, Greene with an .885 against righties.

Even if you just take last year into account, it's still good. (.901 for Mench and .865 for Green)

What am I missing here as it seems Mets fans already have Church as a guy who hits .285-25-85 every year. You can EASILY replace that with a FA or young guy. The question is, why would you not open the farm for Santana? Pedro and El Duque are done, you have no idea what you will get from Perez and Maine, while most also think Pelfrey and the other young pitchers aren't going to cut it. More than any other team the Mets HAVE to make this deal.

I'd rather use Easley against Lefties and save the money on Mench. Not sure who would take on the righties. I wouldn't necessairily be opposed to bringing Green back as long as it's in a platoon. Plus, he KILLS John Smoltz which always makes me happy. I wonder if Xavier Nady is still available, I'd love to get him back.

What "young guy" do the Mets have that can put up .285/25/85 right now?

Hell, what FA is going to give them that?

A platoon is the Mets best bet for RF, even if Church stays.

And I wouldn't be against using Easley either. He slipped my mind. I wouldn't want to add ANOTHER OFer to the roster anyway.

If Church is dealt, I say sign Green or try to pry Nady away from the Bucs.

"Starter Mike Pelfrey could be part of the deal as well...."

There's your missing pitcher in the deal. Put him in the mix in addition to the other four guys and you may have something the Twins would take. But would the Mets really give up all five?

Not sure about Church in CF, because the idea of Cuddyer out there was just Gardenhire blowin' smoke.

adding Church does absolutely nothing to this deal.

I find it incredibly hard to believe that Omar Minaya is going to tell Bill Smith, "Alright, I didnt want to do this, but I'll put Ryan Church in the deal."

and Bill Smith is going to say, "Alright, just the MLB ready talent that we were looking for. Now the fans will have to accept this deal!"

it still comes down to quantity instead of quality. more posturing, more of the same.

How is Church just quantity? He's one of the most underrated players in the game who is going to put up impressive numbers when he finally gets a starting job.

BS is waiting for his dream package, and it's never going to come. Nobody is going to give him what he wants. Deal him now, or enjoy your draft picks.

Why would the inclusion of Church bring this deal down to 4 players instead of 5? I think it would have to be Martinez, Guerra, Mulvey, Church AND Pelfrey for this deal to get done. Oakland got 6 prospects for Haren and a scrub. But it seems that the inclusion of Church and Pelfrey could make it a bit more palatable since those guys can contribute now.

"Mets fans already have Church as a guy who hits .285-25-85 every year. You can EASILY replace that with a FA or young guy."

The remaining free agents are league average at best... and .285-25-85 is not league average.

I'm in agreement with AJ. If it's all five of those guys, Smith can come away saying he got whate he was after going in to this deal... help for 2008 and good future prospects.

It's not that Church and Pelfrey are better "headliners" than Hughes/Cabrera or Lester/Crisp, necessarily... but a package with Martinez and Guerra and one guy such as Mulvey, has more future potential than the "extras" that the Yankees and Sox were willing to part with.

@AJ

The A's got that package for Haren because he's more valuable.

He's under contract for 3 more years (at chump change) versus Santana who is only under contract for one more year but will then need an extension paying him $20mil a year.

Santana shouldn't bring nearly the same return as Haren.

I agree that Church is underrated, and gives the Twins a better starting CF this year than Pridie, in addition to the huge upside of Martinez and Guerra in a couple of years. And in a 4 person deal, he's actually replacing Humber, because the Mets have never offered a deal with both OF.

That said, I wonder if the Twins would be able to get 5 (with Humber back in the deal, since they reportedly like him as much or more than Pelfrey anyway) if they offered to include a halfway decent prospect along with Santana. Someone rated lower than any of the prospects coming back to them.

Hmm. Pretty sure I didn't say the Twins should get the same return as the A's got for Haren. I surely didn't say the Twins should get 6 prospects. I said the Twins should get 4 prospects and Ryan Church. Seems pretty fair considering the A's got 6 prospects.

Whoever said Crisp is better than Church simply doesn't know anything about baseball.

Ryan Church: Age 28
Career: .272/.349/.464

Coco Crisp: Age 28
Career: .280/.329/.409

I think this is a trade the Twins could do. Church and Pelfrey can help now, while Guerra and Martinez could be stars. It's the perfect combination of major league ready talent and risky prospects to make them jump.

Church has value.

Assuming Pelfrey or Humber is in it with the others, this seems reasonable.

Or put another way,

Pelfrey, Guerra, Mulvey, and Gomez OR Martinez was not enough.

Pelfrey, Guerra, Mulvey, Gomez AND Martinez was too much.

Replacing Gomez with Church seems about right.

I still don't know if I take this over an offer including Hughes, but you are certainly spreading out your risk with this one, and getting at least one player who is a near certainty to contribute (Church).

Five is still too much either

Church FMart guerra pelfrey OR

Church FMart guerra mulvey

Hughes is off the table and both offers are better than the sox. BS might not be getting what he wants but that's the best offer and all the mets need to offer

Hmm. Pretty sure I didn't say you said the Twins should get the same return as the A's got for Haren. I surely didn't say you said the Twins should get 6 prospects.

You used Haren as an example. Haren is more valuable than Santana.

6 prospects is not that much more than 4 prospects and Ryan Church. If anything, Church is worth more than a prospect since he's a known commodity.

F-Mart, Guerra, Church, Mulvey, and Humber/Pelfrey is too much.

Five is still too much either

Church FMart guerra pelfrey OR

Church FMart guerra mulvey

Hughes is off the table and both offers are better than the sox. BS might not be getting what he wants but that's the best offer and all the mets need to offer

tis is hilarious. while i agree that the eal seems like a decent one, i just cant get over all this Ryan Church talk.
He may be a little underrated but every Met fan alive was lambasting Minaya for the Milledge deal. Now Church suddenly is a great player.
And Crisp is definetly better then Church. Their offensive numbers are quite similar but Crisp blows him away defensively

Minaya got blasted for trading Milledge, not for getting Church in return.

Church is going to be a good player, but Milledge had the potential to be just as good, if not better. That's why Met fans were so pissed.

And you are just an ignorant clown if you think Coco's and Church's offensive numbers are quite similar. And Coco blows him away defensively? BACK IT UP.

I think this is would be a good deal for the Twins and the Mets. Like other have said before me this is probably the most reasonable of offers that Mets have made.

Church and Pelfrey would be able to play right away, while Guerra and FMart have potential for the future.

With the Sox and Yankees sitting back at this point, the Twins should jump at this deal...They know they're not going to get Gomez and FMart in the same deal.

Crisp has about twice the MLB service time that Church has... with the Twins, that alone makes him the preferred choice when statistically, it's at least close.

Why would the Twins be concerned with service time? Church has just over 2 years and is in arbitration, while Coco has just over 4 years and is making over $10 mil. over the next two years.

Church is cheaper and better.

Unless you by "him" you meant Church...

ok let's say they are equal defesively, Church is noticably better offensive and while crisp has been in the league longer he has a track record of being injury prone. Church must have more value. All this in RFK, not tiny Fenway

Church might be a good addition to the trade, however the Twins still need a leadoff type hitter with speed. So, I still think it has to be Gomez and FMart to complete the trade. Unless they planned on turning around and trying to trade one of the many corner outfielders they would have after completing that trade for a CF.

I can't see how this would, sweeten the pot and help the Twins. The last thing Minnesota needs is another corner outfielder. The prospect of moving Cuddyer to CF is not good. He's got a great arm, but definitely lacks the range necessary to patrol center field. If at all possible, I'd say to hold out for Gomez and Martinez, sign someone like Kenny Lofton for this year, and hand over the CF keys to Gomez for '09. Church may be capable player, but he doesnt have the necessary tools to complete the Twins outfield.

as a mets fan I would much rather see gomez go than FMart go to minn. And I agree he is the better fit

Church doesn't have the necessary tools?

How about the fact that he plays CF?

16 innings in 04
125.2 in 05
369.7 in 06
326 in 07

All while being a part-time player.

Who plays RF for the Mets then? The Mets have Beltran, 80 games of Moises Alou and a bunch of punch-and-judy CF backup types. I like Santana, but opening up a giant hole in RF to bring him to Shea is robbing Peter to pay Paul. And those of you who think a Green/Mench platoon will happen obviously don't know Willie Randolph very well.

If I'm Omar, I give BS the following options:

F-Mart, Gomez, Pelf, Humber
F-Mart, Guerra, Mulvey, Pelf
F-Mart, Guerra, Mulvey, Humber
Gomez, Guerra, Mulvey, Church, Pelfrey

dude the mets are giving both. Good luck with that plan

not giving both sorry.
Those sound like dec proposals

1. Who is "dude"?
2. Who are "both"

"Yeah, Church will be a great 4th outfielder.

What Omar fails to realize is that Milledge is a STARTING OUTFIELDER.

What an idiot.

Posted by: JerseyMetFan | November 30, 2007 at 01:47 PM"

JerseyMetFan, it seems as though your opinion has changed since Minaya made the deal to bring Church in from Washington, despite ever seeing Ryan Church play in a Mets uniform.

I wonder, why was he a 4th OF back in November, but now he's got the breakout potential to be the key to a johan deal?

Oh ok. Makes sense now.

The only way I give up F-Mart and Gomez is if we keep Guerra, Mulvey, and Church. I could live with that.

In those same four seasons where Church has played part-time CF, he's stolen a grand total of 12 bases. Minnesota definitely needs a speedster out in CF, especially if Alexi Casilla won't be our regular second baseman. Church is a good ball player; but I just don't see how bringing him to Minnesota benefits either club.

Nice spelunking. I'll give you that.

I'll be the first to admit that my initial reaction to the deal was 100% knee-jerk. I didn't know a damn thing about Church, and I was too pissed to even care.

In those same four seasons where Church has played part-time CF, he's stolen a grand total of 12 bases. Minnesota definitely needs a speedster out in CF, especially if Alexi Casilla won't be our regular second baseman. Church is a good ball player; but I just don't see how bringing him to Minnesota benefits either club.

Wait, if the Twins get Church they'd play him in center, Cuddyer in right, and Young in left?

Are the Twins aware that Young has THE BEST ARM in the majors. The Rays are my favorite AL team, so I watch them quite a bit, and Young's arm is just like Vlad Guerrero's but with crazy, crazy accuracy. It's like a freakin' laser. Putting Young in left would be a waste of his arm.

JMF, sorry... yes, by "him" I meant Church. The Twins are going to want the guy the farthest away from Free Agency.

I suspect Church is taking the place of Gomez in the discussions. The Twins may figure Church is solid enough in CF to do the deal. He's not great against lefties but the Twins did pick up Monroe, who's solid against lefties while not hitting righthanders well. Maybe, worst case, you see a platoon.

No legit leadoff hitter is apparent, but who knows who might prove passable in ST.

If the deal involves Church, Pelfrey, Martinez and Guerra, and one more guy of any talent at all, the Twins probably make the deal immediately. If the Mets won't deal all four of those guys, Smith may sit tight a few more days.

Ok, some of these comments are out of hand…

Look, I will be the first to say that Crisp isnt that great of a player at all (well under the pressure in Boston ~ I think he might be better elseware; but that’s opinion and besides the point). Anyway, what you guys cant do is argue Church is better than Crisp based off a career batting line or OPS+ though!

First off, lets set it straight that Church is a full year older than Crisp (well within like 20 days…)

Now, Crisp is a full-time starter in the AL-Central/East ~ Church was ½ a platoon for the worst team in the NL-East. I mean, that’s a career 2565 AB vs 997 AB… Give Church an extra 2-300 AB vs Lefties (about the percentage missing from his play) and watch his career numbers plummet. And he’s providing those selective results over small spurts instead of the grind of a full season ~ make him play 2565 AB and see if he sustains it…

The other problem? The OPS+ many choose to base this off of doesn’t take into account you are comparing a speedy, defensive minded full-time CFer to a platooned slugger-type…

To this point, I sadly have to say Crisp is a superior player to Church whether the finished OPS+ says so or not… Church is a part-time player trying to hold onto a situational job in the Majors, Crisp is a starting CFer (although a lesser one, yes). Church compares nicely to guys like Ben Broussard, Crisp compares to guys like Marquis Grissom… This one doesnt even seem that close guys, no matter how you want to try to spin it…

DO NOT COMPARE RYAN CHURCH TO COCO CRISP MAN IT'S JUST SAD,
coco is one of the best in center, the guy defines gravity, im a yankees fan and i look at all red sox games to see how they play, and coco is amazing in center, he is even better than your beltran in center, in 1216 innings he had a .998 felding %, hey even melky caberara feliding % was better with even more innings than beltran.

if the twins accept this deal i'd be suprised, i think twins just messing with mets so red sox and yankeees can improve their offer, i mean look at what the mets are giving..? playes that have not prove anything, gomez is just fast, even i can bat better. elsburrry is nasty, it would be stupid if the twins accept 5 no good players over elsburrry, hey i'd even take phil huges alone over mets 5 players, let mets keeep their 5 prospects, i bet they will not play in the majors, only gomez maybe

Dude, this is sad. Why didn't the Twins take the Hughes/Cabrera-based package? Ouch!

BxSquad,
Carlos Gomez can give the Twins what Coco Crisp could give them in defense. Coco can't hit. By the way, Coco can't hit. Crisp will be a better hitter in the short term than Gomez, but Gomez's ceiling is higher. Martinez, will be a better hitter than Ellesbury, but Ellesbury is and will be a better all around player than Martinez

Jersey, I agree with your post to start the conversation. Who plays RF? This could be interesting, because while I am looking forward to seeing Church get his shot, a Shawn Green/Kevin Mench platoon could be pretty valuable, especially batting 7th. Anyway, this could just be another reporter reaching for something that isnt there, we have no way of knowing. But one thing I do like is that it seems Omar is not caving into his fan base and just offering anything he needs to too seal the deal. It looks like Smith's options are dwindling, and because of that the packages remaining are getting weaker and weaker. I like it.

I love how Gomez already is labeled as a guy that cant hit, mostly by guys who have seen nothing more then his cup of coffee at the ML level. His OBP got better and better in the minors as he got older, and his frame is that of a guy who has the potential to develop big time power as he gets closer to 25 years old and fills out.

Bxsquad, very informative post, I mean really, very insightful. I feel like I am just bloated with knowledge after that invigorating read.

Ha ha...You still look at fielding %. Melky is a horror out there. The fielding bible has him as one of the worst three players in the league when it comes to fielding and Beltran one of the best three. You comparing the two discredits whatever else you say because you show a complete lack of understanding.

RE: Church & Crips. Warp1 for Church was 5.4 and Crips was 6.0

When you factor in service time, I would lean towards Church and considering the Twins need offense, I am sure they would as well.

Crips defense is spectacular, but offensively he is inferior unless he reverts back to 2004 and 2005. Church's ofense closes the gap significantly.

RE: Gomez...you do know he posted better numbers @ 20 in AA than Hanley did in AA @ 21? What gives you an inkling that he cannot hit? There is a reason that experts (and plenty of GMs) universally like him.

By 'Crips' I obviously mean 'Crisp'. I'm sure that won't help my argument....

"tis is hilarious. while i agree that the eal seems like a decent one, i just cant get over all this Ryan Church talk.
He may be a little underrated but every Met fan alive was lambasting Minaya for the Milledge deal. Now Church suddenly is a great player.
And Crisp is definetly better then Church. Their offensive numbers are quite similar but Crisp blows him away defensively"

I am a Met fan. I am also alive. I did not bash this trade. There goes your theory. A lot of MEt fans bashed this trade because they were too lazy too go look up Churchs numbers, or because they didnt realize that getting 2 league average (at worst) starting players for one prospect (with the ability to turn into Gary Sheffield, or Jay Payton, and has soured in the eyes of the organization and around the league), is not being "robbed".

I wasnt happy when I heard of the trade, but after a little while I realized it wasnt awful. I especially like getting Schneider in the trade, because I really dont think you can underestimate having a good defensive guy back there. I havent been watching baseball long enough to remember the Mets having a good starting catcher that actually could throw people out. He is the 8th hitter and should get on base at a similar clip to Loduca anyway, while being a huge upgrade defensively.

Again, there is simply no chance that the Twins will take Coco Crisp in a trade for Johan Santana and allow the Red Sox to keep Ellsbury! The Twins have repeatedly told the Red Sox that they will not take Coco Crisp instead of Ellsbury. If the Red Sox want to keept Buchholz then they have to give Twins Ellsbury AND Lester.

Coco Crisp simply isn't good enough to take back as a key player in trade for a two time Cy Young winner in his prime. Crisp is a guy you play every day when you don't have other options, not because you want him out there. It doesn't make any difference whether Coco Crisp is statistically a "better" player than Ryan Church; the point is that Twins management is smart enough to know that they can can be forgiven if they gambled on acquiring promising players who just never panned out, but will not be forgiven for taking a known mediocrity like Coco Crisp instead.

I think it depends on what you really value. Crisp's VORP is 11.9 compared to 22.2 for Church.

When you factor in defense, WARP has Crips ahead. There are some that think WARP is flawed a bit when it comes to defense, but it still gives us something tangible to look at.

I would not say Church is statiscally worse than Crisp in any way. It just is a bit of preference as to whether you are looking for defense or offense. In the case of the Red Sox, they would presumably favor defense since they have a prolific offense and the Twins might lean towards offense.

It should also be noted that Church is not a butcher in the field.

As for Ellsbury vs. Crisp, Ellsbury can probably step in and do what Coco did for a fraction of the money. However, let us not get blinded by his streak to end the season. Also, I think people are undervaluing Crisp a bit. He was very bad in Boston, but pretty damn good in Cleveland in '04 and '05. Like Renteria, he maybe just cannot hack it in Boston. Would anyone be truly shocked to see him be a more productive players elsewhere?

Given that I think Ellsbury and CoCo are not as far off as it seems, I’d take Lester/Lowrie/Crisp/Masterson over an Ellsbury/Lowrie/Masterson/Whomever deal.

Although, if Bowden was the ‘whomever’ in the other deal, I would probably change my mind. Of course we have no idea what any real deal proposals are.

as a nats fan, i like church and agree he was a bit underrated. but don't underestimate the fact that he's very one-sided at the plate and that, because of his inability to hit lefties, he was platooned with... wait for it... nook logan.

let me say it again, he was platooned with... NOOK LOGAN.

he's a great 4th OF, and plays well when given more limited ABs (say 300-400). but while he "projects" out nicely for a full season, when he's playing every day, he doesn't seem to hit as well.

he's really a platoon guy, not a solid full-time starter.

metro - WARP and VORP are irrelevant when discussing Coco Crisp. He carries a reputation - deserved or not - as a barely adequate player who you will always being looking to replace. There is virtually no chance that he will get better at this point in his career. As you noted, he was "very bad" in Boston and was replaced by Ellsbury who has a chance to be a pretty good ballplayer. For that reason, the Twins will never trade Santana to Boston if the Red Sox insist on unloading Crisp rather than including Ellsbury in the deal. Surely Mr. Epstein knows that if he really wants Santana, all he has to do is include Ellsbury AND Lester and the deal probably gets done. The Red Sox with Santana are probably unbeatable plus they get to keep their prize prospect Buchholz and Crisp can play CF. After reading some of these posts from Red Sox fans about how good Coco Crisp really is, one would think they would be ecstatic at the prospect of Coco Crisp and his WARP and VORP in CF next season. I think they are blowing smoke however; Red Sox fans want to be rid of Coco Crisp because they are intelligent fans and know that Crisp ought not to be starting for anyone.

I don't see why the Twins would change their posistion. They have been consistant about getting youth they can control for 5 years or more. Church doesn't fit here.

before any deal goes therough, the twins would contact either boston on yankees on a final decision. martinez will be a better hitter than ellsbury...? ellsbury is already played in the mlb and hit .353. caberara is one of the worst center feilder..? dude i looked at every yankees game, in not one did he drop a ball, he always got to the play and made the plays, he is not a bad center feilder

yes and mrknow it all, tell me how melky is a bad player when he played 9 more innings than beltran, he lead beltran in almost everything in feilding stats, better feilding %, 10 more assist than beltran, 1 less error, only thing beltran lead him in was one more double play, so tell me how come he was a bad center feilder if he lead beltran in all those stats..?saying anything else would just be ignorant.
mets is like a laughing stock in my school because their a disgrace to new york, i love all ny sports except mets, because we have a better ny baseball team, which is the yankees, even if the mets win the world series for 10 years straight still they would not match up to the yankees.

ha I love when fans make statements like that shows what you really know. If it suits you you're right melky is better than the nl gold glove winner at def. Your great please continue to be a Yankees fan. Also I must agree that church isn't all that great. I did like the trade that got him though. He is also ready for everyday play at CF.

fish and mets please read, no way melky would ever be better than beltran. i was trying to make a point, someone said melky was an aweful cf, so i compared him to beltran, to see how much different their stats was, no way melky would be better than beltran. wright, reyes, and beltran are some of my favourite players, and of course i'll stay a yankees fan duhh, yanks earn more so they spend more, whiles mets pockets their money.

OK, a few things.

1) Church is not any better than Crisp. The person who commented on the fact that Church can't and hasn't hit lefties is dead-on. You cannot strictly compare their OPS. Crisp is a full-time player while Church has had over 268 ab's exactly ONCE! And Crips is a far, far superior defensive player.

2) I agree that Church probably won't close the deal. Seems like a stretch, unless there's still at least Martinez/Pelfrey/Guerra/Mulvey or Humber in the package.

3) To the poster that commented on Young's arm, yes, he has a cannon, but you are forgetting about Cuddyer, who also has a cannon. In fact, Cuddyer tied for the lead in OF assists in the majors last year with 19, and that was despite the fact that he missed 3 weeks of time, and opposing teams stopped running on him in the 2nd half. Those are 2 of the best outfield arms in the whole game. There will be a lot of station to station games for opposing teams against the Twins this year. Plus Cuddyer plays the baggie at the Dome great and LF in the Dome requires a bit more range than RF (Delmon has slighly more range). It makes sense for Delmon to play LF and Cuddyer to play RF and that is exactly what will happen. For what it's worth, Cuddyer and Young both have very bad range, so the Twins do need a very good defensive CF to make up for that. Church would not be it.

4) Melky Cabrera is NOT a good defensive CF. He is terrible, quite frankly. 2nd worst CF in baseball according to the Fielding Bible, which is a lot more reliable than "fielding percentage." His one redeeming tool is a very good arm. That's it. And arm strength is far from the most important tool for a CF.

In the end, as a Twins fan, I still definitely prefer either of the Sox packages, but I also do not want to see that frightening Sox staff every year in the playoffs with Santana/Beckett/Buchholz/Dice-K. So I would be willing to take less to deal with the Mets, and that's what this is. Just not sure if I would settle for THIS much less. If the Twins can get a decent defensive CF then it's fine to accept a package like Martinez/Guerra/Pelfrey/Mulvey/Humber, an spin a couple of the arms elsewhere for a pitcher.

Otherwise, just doesn't make a ton of sense to me.

Oh, I note that the Church platoon player comment was brought by darkstar.

Good stuff man. You are seriously bringing it lately.

"mets is like a laughing stock in my school because their a disgrace to new york,"

Kind of like how you are the laughing stock of this blog? I mean, your baseball knowledge is very small, if you have any at all, and your intelligence on being a human also sucks. Crappy spelling and grammar and just being an idiot. Good day.

laughing stock of this blog..? if i was a net freak like yourself maybe i would be hurt, but i'm not, sorry to disappoint you there.

am i writing an essay or something for you to grade my grammar..? this is the internet you know bud, if you don't like what i'm saying about the mets just go take a bath or something

The Twins have no need for Church, where would they play him. Church is not the type of outfielder the Twins would play in center and would still need to acquire a center fielder. They have more outfielders now then they need except they have no one to play center. Ideally the Twins center fielder hits lead off too.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment


Top Stories



Search MLBTR

Lijit Search

MLBTR Features



Recent Posts


MLBTR Mailing List

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Rumors By Team



Monthly Archives


Live Chats


Tuesdays at 2 p.m. CST



Site Map     Contact     About     Advertise     Privacy Policy     Widget     Twitter     Rss Feed


MLB Trade Rumors is not affiliated with Major League Baseball, MLB or MLB.com.