![]() |
|
|
| |
« Blocked Prospects: Reggie Willits | Main | Sox To Wait On Crede Trade? »
Ken Rosenthal has a new column up; let's take a look.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e550a2332e8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rosenthal's Latest: Thames, Konerko, Ellis, Atkins:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
On Konerko...I love him, but I would like to see him be moved to make space for Fields. I want to see the Sox keep Crede--he is a stud defensively and not so bad with the bat. Fields will never pan out to be a good third baseman. Put his ass at First. Make the move, Kenny.
Posted by: whimser | March 06, 2008 at 09:36 AM
Konerko is exactly what the Reds need. A right handed power bat to help support griffey and dunn. Phillips is good, but i dont want him to have too much pressure on him.
Votto for Konerko?
Bailey for Konerko? and move Votto somewhere, or put him in left?
Posted by: GmblngPtchr20 | March 06, 2008 at 09:37 AM
i dont know about the reds needing konerko. votto is going to be really good and hes really cheap. the reds need pitching, not offense anyways. everyone should check those stats out about basestealers against the padres in the rosenthal column. those numbers are amazing. im not sure if its the pitchers or the catcher(whos their catcher anyways, bowen?) but those stats are nuts. i will be remembering this when fantasy baseball starts.
Posted by: Joelcards | March 06, 2008 at 09:45 AM
I love Konerko, but he is a 1 1/2 tool player. He has the power, and a decent average, but he can only play one position (barely) and has negative speed.
He's the kind of guy who has more value to the White Sox than any other team, so I don't see some other team giving up what the Sox would want in return, which is a very good starting pitcher.
Posted by: cabiness42 | March 06, 2008 at 09:45 AM
I am a huge Whitesox fan and I think my fellow fans overhype Crede. He is good defensively but he sucks offensively. He has a career average of .259 and career OBP of .305. He is just as useless as Podsednik in my opinion. Posednik only brought speed to the table and Crede only brings defense.
Sure Crede had one great year, but so did Podsednik.
I'm open to trading Konerko, but it has to be the right trade.
Posted by: striker | March 06, 2008 at 09:57 AM
I can't see Omar going for Konerko unless he knew Delgado was going to miss significant time. It's not like you can put one of them in the OF when they're both healthy.
Nady plzzzzzzzzz.
Posted by: stellar | March 06, 2008 at 10:03 AM
Striker, I curious. What would you consider the right trade?
Posted by: sweetswingingbw | March 06, 2008 at 10:04 AM
Jonny Gomes FOR Sosa and a minor league arm.
Posted by: Superman | March 06, 2008 at 10:22 AM
I imagine the Yanks and Mets are more interested in getting in on the Texeira sweepstakes next year then Konerko. While Giambi sucks at first he can match or beat Konerko's obp and match his power #'s, of course being healthy is a long-shot. I imagine they take that gamble of Ensberg/Giambi and go after Texeira in the off-season. With Delgado the Mets are fine and would also prefer to lock-in on Tex in the off-season rather then find a place to move or play Delgado. Doesn't make much sense to me for either club.
Posted by: Jared78 | March 06, 2008 at 10:24 AM
I think Ellis is a pretty decent signing for Oakland, as long as it's only for three years or so.
Beane will still be able to trade him, but honestly for that type of money why not, Oakland already unloaded a lotta dough this offseason.
It would be great if they could somehow trade for a good prospect for the infield though. Im sure Beane won't let us down.
Posted by: BaseBallz | March 06, 2008 at 11:05 AM
Would Swisher move over to 1B if they dealt Konerko? And wouldn't the LAA be a perfect fit? They have extra OFs and Ps.
P. E.Santana or J.Saunders
OF R.Willits
1B K.Morales
for
1B Konerko
Posted by: XD23 | March 06, 2008 at 11:29 AM
I believe that Konerko is still one of the better middle of the order right handed bats in the game, and I am sure KW does as well. An asking price for Konerko? It is definitely reasonable that KW would want a lot in return, for instance if the reds wanted konerko that badly, KW would probably ask for Cueto and Baily or Bailey and Votto in return. Konerko is not really a quick fix type of solution, as he is good enough to be a long-term answer at first for a team, and he still has a heavy price tag in terms of valuable prospects. I do agree though, I see the mets and yanks making a run at Teixera in the offseason, with the one who does not land Teixera ( or hopefully both if my braves can extend him) having renewed interest in konerko as a back up option.
Posted by: bravesbeast | March 06, 2008 at 11:53 AM
Crisp & Lowrie to OAK for Street?
I'm not sure if Epstien would be willing to do that after the Gagne fiasco though.
Posted by: maximumpotential | March 06, 2008 at 12:09 PM
That would be a great deal !
Even better if they threw in Masterson ! Too bad Epstein is smart though.
Lowrie and Crisp seems reasonable but not killer for a team that needs a strong closer presence, which is why id want Masterson or some other reliever in there.
But i do like Lowrie !
Posted by: BaseBallz | March 06, 2008 at 12:22 PM
“I believe that Konerko is still one of the better middle of the order right handed bats in the game, and I am sure KW does as well.”
The biggest concern probably comes in the fact that a loss of power moving away from Chicago will affect his output and value. Esp if he was to move to a location like Anaheim, which suppresses power… With the salary (12M each next 2YR), injury/ageing concerns and complete lack of versatility, well you can begin to see what could make him difficult to move…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 06, 2008 at 12:35 PM
I can see your point darkstar, as Konerko is getting up there in years, even though I think he still has plenty of good ones left in him. The delimma is do you trade him now and see what kind of value you can get for him coming off a subpar year last year, or do you wait and see if you could not get more value out of him if he were to have a stellar season this season. Or, his value could plummet even more. I would say unless KW is blown away, he needs to hold on to Konerko. He extended dye and burlhae, gave up a lot to get swisher,all in the hopes to compete now. and if he trades Konerko it may reflect bad on KW, and I do not think he is one who wants to project negative publicity back on himself
Posted by: bravesbeast | March 06, 2008 at 12:47 PM
If all it would take to keep Ellis is around $5 million/year, then there is no reason to trade him. He's amazing defensively, and his bat is average to slightly better than average.
There is no good replacement for him in the minors anyways even in a rebuilding year.
Posted by: green_and_gold | March 06, 2008 at 12:59 PM
Agreed, Ellis at $5m is a keeper. The guy is solid at 2nd base.
Posted by: bjsguess | March 06, 2008 at 01:03 PM
Rock,
the second part of your post (injury concerns) is why the first (salary) isnt really that true. Sure, 12M each over the next *3* years (typo above) isnt a ton of cash for a big bat, but if that big bat is a injury risk, egression risk, offers no flexibility and has benefited from a dream location for his hitting style then that 36M/3YR commitment is looking rather steep.
I mentioned it in the other Sox thread, if a deal goes down to Anaheim, I could see a very good fit in Mathews. Similar salary commitment (and Anaheim wont increase payroll, that needs to be kept in mind), fills both teams needs (Ana experienced Power threat, Sox experience CFer) and takes away from the others overstock (Anaheim with speedy-type OFers, ChiSox with slow-power 1B/DH types). I see it as a match made in heaven, just with some other prospect included to the Sox…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 06, 2008 at 01:56 PM
Just wanted to clarify a bit…
Konerko is a good hitter who went through the normal peak-years you would expect based off his age. He is a fair OBP guy who benefited greatly in the lineup/park he was in. His power though has seen a steady decline the last 4 years. His HR/F went from 22% in 2004, to 20% (2005) to 18% (2006) to 16% (2007). If he continues to lose power, he will also not be pitched as cautiously; if he is not pitched as cautiously, then he will see a possible OBP drop ontop of what he experiences anyway. Like I said, he is a good hitter; but good hitters with power but no speed, who start to lose their power, don’t generally hold up very well for very long. Moving away from Chicago (which increases the HR/FB rate to begin with) only increases the likelihood that he sees regression.
If he stays on the Sox I could see him putting up numbers similar to last year for a couple more years. If he goes to a similar park, that is also a strong possibility. But if he goes to a more neutral, or pitchers-park (like Anaheim is in an extreme way), then his production should regress much quicker and he would be a rather big risk on a 3/36 contract. I imagine GMs are thinking this, I cant imagine they would be GMs if they weren’t. That’s why I said what I did…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 06, 2008 at 02:47 PM
The thing with Konerko though is that he has a great reputation around baseball, and is considered a great clubhouse guy. He has all the makings of a guy who would get overvalued in a trade.
Some teams that should be interested would be the Mets, Yankees, Angels and maybe the Giants as a longshot.
I think that the Angels would definately be the best fit, as their glaring weakness is power, and that is essentially Konerko's calling card. Even though his power has declined steadily, he's still considered one of the better power hitters in baseball. Considering that the Angels already have two young first basemen in Casey Kotchman and Kendry Morales, I presume that one of those guys would be in the deal. I could also see Gary Matthews Jr. going to Chicago, giving them a genuine center fielder. On top of that, considering that the White Sox would no longer be benefitting financially from this deal, they would probably want a decent young pitcher back. So my idea for the Angels:
Paul Konerko to the Angels in exchange for Gary Matthews Jr., Kendry Morales, and Ervin Santana. The Angels would then use Kotchman to add another starting pitcher, I presume.
The Yankees are another logical team that I could see having serious interest in Pauleee. Obviously the Yankees don't exactly need another big bopper at first, but then again it is the Yankees, and adding better players doesn't hurt. Currently the Yanks' options at first are Jason Giambi, Shelley Duncan, Jason Lane, Morgan Ensberg and Wilson Betemit. Not terribly impressive.
A Konerko deal with the Yankees would likely take one of two forms: Ian Kennedy and Melky Cabrera for Konerko OR Alan Horne and Austin Jackson for Konerko.
Either way the White Sox get a long term center fielder and a good pitching prospect. I think those two assets would be the main things that the Sox would persue in a Konerko trade.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 06, 2008 at 05:11 PM
Although I do know the Angels would probably be more than happy to remove Mathews from their payroll, adding Konerko at his commitment isnt enough to get overzealous here. Konerko is almost certainly the DH in Anaheim, with Kotchman at 1B (gotta keep him healthy afterall, and keeping him away from 1B is a great start). That doesn’t exactly help the OF logjam too much…
I could see them maybe going as high as Mathews + Morales + projectable low-minors pitcher, but it really wouldn’t be anyone like Santana. Santana + Morales alone can get a pretty good return, and this isnt exactly a team which has been enthusiastic to trade their youngsters ~ so think of it that way… Maybe if Crede was included, but I don’t think Paully alone gets that one done…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 06, 2008 at 05:38 PM
Yeah you're probably right that Kotchman would stay at first with Konerko at DH. Actually I'm shocked I didn't think of that its pretty simple. But I think that considering that Matthews Jr. kinda sucks, the White Sox should be able to net Morales and Santana. Morales really doesn't have a ton of trade value because he's been doing nothing for three years, even though he is still just 24.
I agree that the Angels are quite hesitant to deal their youngsters, but they would be dealing from good surplusses. If they deal Morales they'd still have Kotchman long term, and if they dealt Santana, they'd still have Lackey, Weaver, Saunders, Adenhart, Walden and other good youngish pitchers.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 06, 2008 at 05:49 PM
Not sure, but I just really cant see the Angels going for it… Its 2 starters off the club, plus Morales ~ that’s steep even if Mathews is expendable and fairly unwanted… I think they would have pushed harder for Cabrera who filled a much bigger hole/question than to tap into their youngsters and give Mathews for Konerko.
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 06, 2008 at 07:15 PM
Stop with the speculating... Konerko isn't going anywhere as of now, and his 10-5 kicks in by May.
I think the Sox should go for a Fields package for Cain, personally. Something that could work out for both sides :) If I had to guess, I would try Fields, Broadway, Richar, and Russell or Oneli Perez or something.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 06, 2008 at 07:41 PM
Morales hasn't been doing anything? He came over at age 22. He jumped from A+ to AA in a single year. He posted OPS's of 944/879 along the way.
At age 23 he posted 875 OPS in AAA. At age 24 he split time in AAA again posting a 871 OPS. He also managed to post an 812OPS in the bigs.
They guy has 3 years under his belt playing ball in the US. He hasn't had consistent playing time yet. It's a bit early to write off this 24 year old.
Posted by: bjsguess | March 06, 2008 at 07:54 PM
I meant he hasn't done anything in the majors. I know his potential is pretty good and his performance in the minors has been solid. I'm just saying that he's still simply a good prospect.
And darkstar, the thing is that I hardly consider Gary Matthews a starter. Considering that the Angels have six capable outfielders (Guerrero, Hunter, Anderson, Matthews, Rivera, Willits), Matthews is extremely expendable. And when you consider that his primary value was his defense in center, which isn't even being utilized in LA, he becomes even less valuable to the Angels. If they dealt him, the outfield would continue without missing a beat. Considering that Konerko would be DHing anyways, that'd still be five guys for three spots. Moving Matthews would be nearly essential for this deal to happen.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 06, 2008 at 08:37 PM
"Moving Matthews would be nearly essential for this deal to happen. "
...yeah, but I still dont think it means 2 solid youngsters need to be included as well, its all I'm saying. I mean, a power hitting DH is a tad easier to find than a plus hitting great fielding CF, whether we all think he sucks or not is kind of beside the point because the stats do pretty much say otherwise in comparison to what the position generally produces... Matthews + Morales = no problem. Mathews + Morales + Santana with Crede added in, probably gets done. That for just Konerko though… I just think they don’t ever go for it…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 06, 2008 at 08:55 PM
If the difference between getting Santana and not getting Santana is Joe Crede, then I think thats a deal the White Sox would have to. If the deal would be Matthews, Morales and a mediocre prospect for Konerko, then I think that including Joe Crede in order to replace that mediocre prospect with Ervin Santana is definately worth it. From what I, and likely you, have been hearing, Crede isn't getting a lot of interest. In that deal you proposed, you would be essentially trading Crede and a mediocre prospect for Ervin Santana. Personally I would do that in a second. If the White Sox could net Matthews, Morales and Santana for Konerko and Crede, I think they might as well do it.
SS Cabrera
2B A. Ramirez
LF Swisher
DH Thome
RF Dye
3B Fields
1B Morales
C Pierzynski
CF Matthews Jr.
Rotation:
Buehrle, Vazquez, Danks, Contreras, Santana with Floyd as the spot starter which is where he belongs
Plus then you would have Carlos Quentin on the bench as well, offering the veterans an oppurtunity to rest. Even though I would argue that Quentin deserves a shot at a starting job, I think he could still get 400+ at bats off the bench. He can play both of the corner outfield positions, and Swisher could easily move to first base if necessary. This trade would just give the White Sox a more versatile team that wouldn't be forced to depend on the long ball, as well as another potential top of the rotation starter in Santana. I really believe Santana could still be special if he can pitch the way he does in LA everywhere else. That seems like a reasonable thing to hope for. I mean, the guy won 16 and posted a 4.28 ERA and 1.23 WHIP when he was 23, so he's capable of being successful.
Posted by: scribbletone | March 06, 2008 at 10:24 PM
Yeah, Mathews + Morales + Santana for Konerko + Crede really, probably gets done. It gives Anaheim the power bat that they have really been looking for, it gives them a stop-gap 3B with upside which would allow them to take it really easy with Wood (which they seem intent on), it frees Figgins to play 3B (when Crede is on days off, he will need um), spell Anderson in LF (he too needs lots of rest), RF in place of Vlad (you guessed it, needs rest), and when Kotchamn takes days off Paully can play there with any of the above as the DH. It doesn’t solve the depth and what is done with guys like Willits/Rivera/Quinlan/etc ~ but they don’t seem concerned with that anyway and the team is updated for 08 so does it really matter in their eyes?
Now, unfortunately we are not the GMs though, so its probably all for not. Because it does make sense, the likelihood of it actually taking place is probably about as good as me winning the lotto while being struck by lightning as a black cat scurries in front of my feet with a rabbits foot in its mouth. Yeah, I think those odds probably cover the likelihood pretty well :)
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 07, 2008 at 12:22 AM
Um guys... Matthews is worthless. Not only is he terrible on defense
http://www.billjamesonline.net/fieldingbible/charts/leaders2-07.gif
but his OBP last year as a whole was less then Jerry Owens' second half, and Owens is a very good center fielder, as you can see above. That alone might make them equal in value, but Owens averages about 50 stolen bases a year at an 81% clip. That's a great stolen base number and success rate combo, for those in the know. But wait, here's the kicker- Matthews is due $44 million over the next four seasons! That's right people. He's worse than Jerry Owens and he's due about $42-40 million more than him over the next four seasons. Matthews SUCKS, and he's not even close to being worth Konerko, even with the other guys.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 07, 2008 at 12:01 PM
Considering it was Owen's first extensive taste of the majors, his second half holds more water. And yes, Matthews is terrible on defense. So really, similar players. Now, do I deal with Matthews $44 million, or Owens' near major league minimum and maybe a year of arbitration. Major league minimum, $44 million. Tough call.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 07, 2008 at 02:00 PM
Deception:
“Deception is the act of convincing another to believe information that is not true, or not the whole truth as in certain types of half-truths.
Deception involves concepts like propaganda, distraction and/or concealment. Fiction, while sometimes manipulative, is not a deception unless it is portrayed as the whole truth.”
See, what we have here is trying to make someone not look good to fit the feelings instead of trying to relate the facts as they stand. What we know is that Mathews played in the 2nd hardest park in the AL to hit in. What we know is that he hit for a normal BAbip in the first half where he posted a .285/.343/.452 line. What we also know is he experienced a flukishly low BAbip in the second half, (.227 BAbip to be exact where normal is .300 and low is .250 which is ‘weak’ like Juan Pierre range) and a .213/.302/.379 line was the product of said BAbip. If you translate that to a normal BAbip, you see a BA somewhere in the .271 range, an OBP something like .330 and its impossible to know how much the power was effected but you can imagine it probably would have been about .430-440-ish. If he had a normal BAbip in the second half, we then have a seasons total of something like .280/.340/.440 which again, was in a pitcher park.
Does he suck? Personally I don’t care for the guy, but no ~ I cant say that he “sucks” in any way shape or form. BUT, the average CF hit .272/.338/.420 and the Average LO hitter was .259/.277/.345 ~ he easily beats the LO hitter line and is right around the CF one in a pitchers park while experiencing a flukeishly low BAbip… When we adjust his BAbip, we actually see that he hit at an ability right about LgAvg for CFers but that still doesn’t take him out of the unfriendly hitting environment… Do you personally want him? Obviously not ~ but that doesn’t mean he isnt probably what the team should be looking at. I mean, whats the other options ~ play a LF/1B/DH type in CF or go with Jerry Owens who you hope does well based off a small 2nd half sample size?
What was proposed makes since is a unneeded and repetitive part like Konerko for the Sox is turned into something extremely fitting to their needs. And lets not kid ourselves here, the biggest knock on Mathews is something like “oh yeah, he did great in Tex but what happens when he isnt in as friendly of a park to hit in” ~ you know, like the park he would be going to! If he hits .313/.372/.495 in Chicago like he did in Texas the year before, don’t you kind of look brilliant pulling off such a move for an unneeded and instantly replaced part? (Swisher replaces Konerko perfectly so…) Oh, and then we have the teams FO’s tendencies to think about, which, well they seem to be trying to get vets or names for all the positions…
You know I’m not a ChiSox fan, you know I will be extremely open about what I see not working. Well, I see this as working, I see this as making them much better this and the next few years because a vet CF instead of a displaced slow slugger out there is kind of extreme. Just don’t be surprised if something along those lines is talked about, or even ends up happening, it fits quite well…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 07, 2008 at 06:26 PM
BTW Gogo, completely unrelated and just mentioned cause its one of those “lets chuckle about it” type things me and you have been able to do in the past… but you guys were outscored 21 to 1 in two SS games today :\ I mean, I know its ST, but whats going on? Oh Kenny, what did you do…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 07, 2008 at 06:27 PM
…errr, I gave a typo up there that I noticed and wanted to correct because it too is “deceiving” :) hehehe…
so Stat correction:
the ML Avg LO hit .277/.345/.415.
Not sure what happened when I typed it up the first time, but the sentence it was given in was still correct and it doesn’t change the point…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 07, 2008 at 07:31 PM
I think I've made my point- Owens can provide the same value for a lot less, and not trading the guy who has been a fixture slugger for years on the South Side. He plays much better defense, he steals very well and a lot more than Matthews. He can get on base respectably.
Oh, and your BABIP argument is futile... his line drive rate went from 20% and 19% in 05 and 07 to a meager 13% in 06. His LD rate went from 16% in July, to 11% and a vomit inducing 4% in September. So it isn't hard to see why his BABIP plummeted. Owens' line drive rate was about 16-17% last season, and his walk rate more than doubled from June/July to August/September. He's a hell of a lot cheaper, a hell of a lot younger(GMJ is going on 34- forgot to mention that) a hell of a lot faster and a hell of a lot better on defense. The only thing he is worse at is hitting for power, which is why we have... you guessed it, Konerko.
And I don't see why you call Swisher a LF/1B/DH type. He's one of the better defensive right fielders and first basemen in either league and poor in center, in fact he's better than Matthews at this point.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 07, 2008 at 11:44 PM
“His LD rate went from 16% in July, to 11% and a vomit inducing 4% in September. So it isn't hard to see why his BABIP plummeted”
…But that itself isnt a fluke to you? And even with a low LD rate, the BAbip isnt completely explained away… If anything, your reply is helping to explain how strange a halfseason he really had…
“I think I've made my point- Owens…”
…Fine, you go with your prospect who may or may not ever do anything while you watch Swisher in CF most of the time and your 1B continue to deteriorate before your eyes. Should make for a fun team to take advantage of in the AL-C!
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 08, 2008 at 12:48 AM