![]() |
|
|
| |
« Mets Have No Interest In Bonds | Main | Cubs Eyeing Coco »
The indefatigable Aaron Rowand continues his Joe Crede-campaign, hoping the Giants will make a deal for him now that the Dodgers have entered the picture. In an article in the Chicago Sports Tribune, Roward argues that Crede has played the last few seasons with a bad back and, now healthy, will put forth his best season yet.
''I'm just the middle man,'' Rowand said when asked how hard he has been pushing to be reunited with his close friend. ''I'm not playing recruiter. It's not like I'm going to [the front office] and saying, 'Get him.' They asked me, and obviously everyone knows what he can do on the baseball field. I told them, 'You're asking a guy that is biased, but I'll give you my answer.' God knows I want to play with Joe again.''
Joe Cowley of the Chicago Sun Times chimes in,
"While the Sox haven't even come out and said whether they'll trade Crede this spring, all signs point to the third baseman's departure. Now that the Los Angeles Dodgers have shown interest in Crede, Williams can sit back and wait for the best offer."
MLBTR discussed the Dodgers interest yesterday, and readers seem to agree with Mr. Rowand: acquiring Crede is a great move for either team.
By Nat Boyle
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515b9a69e200e550d280da8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Rowand Still Hoping For Crede To Giants:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


|
|
Let's do a little one-stop shopping. Package Crede, Uribe AND Konerko and ship them all to San Francisco as long as we get Sanchez, Valdez, Winn, Velez and Matos.
The Sox move Swisher to 1B - where he belongs; Winn to LF or CF and leadoff; use Sanchez to push Floyd & Masset and Valdez takes McDougal's spot on the roster, while Velez and Matos get ready for September call ups.
The Giants get two corner infielders with power and an insurance policy for Vizquel and Durham, while keeping their starting rotation.
Posted by: navylifer3 | March 09, 2008 at 11:57 AM
TWO IDEAS:
Josh Fields, Lance Broadway and Juan Uribe for Matt Cain.
Giants get a legit power prospect, a decent stopgap shortstop and second baseman, and a good pitching prospect. The White Sox get a potential top of the rotation starter to fill out the rotation with Buehrle, Vazquez, Danks and Contreras.
OR
Paul Konerko, Joe Crede and Juan Uribe for Matt Cain and Dave Roberts.
If the White Sox want Cain, they're likely gonna have to give up a lot for it. In this deal the Giants add a lot of hitting, and suddenly become a more complete team.
The White Sox would be a very intriguing team with either of these moves. If they made this move, which I prefer to the previously stated one, then they could contend for a wild card or something at least.
CF Roberts
SS Cabrera
DH Thome
1B Swisher
RF Dye
3B Fields
C Pierzynski
LF Quentin
2B Ramirez/Richar
Rotation: Buehrle, Vazquez, Cain, Danks, Contreras with Floyd as the spot starter
Posted by: scribbletone | March 09, 2008 at 12:36 PM
From my point of view, it would all depend on the expected return. I think Chicago fans way overrate Crede. He's excellent defensively, and he has power. BUT...he has a horrible OBP lifetime, and his health is not dependable. Back injuries are especially likely to recur. If I were the Giants, for example, I'd've preferred Feliz--great fielder, good power, terrible OBP, less injury history, younger. But they let him go. If I were the Dodgers--of course, who can know with the Dodgers--they should've given the job to LaRoche a long time ago--but I wouldn't give up too much for a temporary solution maybe no better than Nomar--until LaRoche comes back.
Posted by: Playwright | March 09, 2008 at 12:51 PM
Lincecum or Cain for Konerko? Even Sabean knows better than that. Two excellent young pitchers--for each of whom they've fielded offers of young hitting studs--for an aging, declining, one-dimensional slugger? There are no THREE players on the White Sox roster for whom I'd trade either Lincecum or Cain.
Posted by: Playwright | March 09, 2008 at 12:57 PM
There is NO way the Giants trade Cain or Lincecum for Konerko. Complete fantasy.
It's already been discussed and the consensus (aside from White Sox fans) is that Crede is worth a middle reliever at best. Throwing in Juan Uribe and Josh Fields doesn't help either.
If you want Lincecum or Cain it will cost you a bunch. It will also go counter to the White Sox dream of being a contender this year. Giving up 3 positional players for one starting pitcher and one really bad outfielder is not how you win in 08.
Posted by: bjsguess | March 09, 2008 at 12:57 PM
If I'm the Giants the discussion starts with Swisher and Crede.
To give up Cain, which I wouldn't do if I were them, wouldn't involve Konerko(wrong side of 30)or Uribe(wrong side of good).
Posted by: sweetswingingbw | March 09, 2008 at 01:06 PM
Cain - Not going anywhere.
Lincecum - See Cain.
Konerko - Wouldn't go for less than one of the above. See Cain.
The rest -
Crede - Not helping his cause at all.
Lowry - See Crede.
Uribe - Sucks.
The only player Giants are looking at is Crede. He has been abismal in S.T. Maybe he will pick up, maybe not.
As of now, there is NO reason for Giants to give up ANYTHING of value.
Crede for Fred Lewis only because Giants have too many OF. Other than that....no deal.
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | March 09, 2008 at 01:07 PM
Bbbj...
The Giants are going to start with Brian Bocock at SS until Omar gets back. Similiar player....great glove not so good bat.
I wanted Crede in the beginning, but his S.T. is making me believe his back may not be healthy as said.
I would love to have Konerko, but we don't have the pieces to make it work.
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | March 09, 2008 at 01:49 PM
Frandsen will start at short. If Bocock does he won't OPS his own weight. And Playwright, you know Feliz required a two year contract AND is 3 years older to a day? If it was one year I'm sure they would have brought him back but apparently he left on bad terms anyway.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 09, 2008 at 02:42 PM
"..readers seem to agree with Mr. Rowand: acquiring Crede is a great move for either team?" True only if by "either team" you mean the White Sox and whichever divisional rival *doesn't* trade for Crede's bad back, 90 OPS+ bat and Boras association.
Z4cy, I can't believe anyone ever wanted Crede. His hitting has been below-average in four out of five years. He's Pedro Feliz, but more expensive and with an injury history. I wasn't sorry to see Feliz's putrid bat go. Why would any fan want another 3B who can't hit?
ggph, Frandsen can't handle short to save his life. The team has made as much clear, not that anyone with eyes to see ever thought he could defend that position. He makes Jeter look like a good defender, and that's just sad.
Konerko can hit, but he's not young, he has a no-trade clause and he plays the weakest defensive position on the diamond. Sure, I'd pick him up on a lopsided trade, but that isn't going to happen. I would not trade value for him to get the Giants from 70 to 75 wins this year.
Posted by: wcw | March 09, 2008 at 02:49 PM
I believe Velez could handle short.
Posted by: oxfrat1665 | March 09, 2008 at 03:02 PM
yeah, but Feliz on 2 years while giving nothing up is better than Crede on 1 year while giving something up. I think thats the point, and their lack of interest in bringing back Feliz makes interest in Crede questionable ~ well, unless the cost is absolutely minimal.
Their lack of activity on the FA market shows that the team is more interested in seeing what they have in the kids than to try to form a resemblance of a club. They had Dallas in the offices with the intent of him manning 3B, but didnt even want to offer like 1M to a guy off back problems apparently (I mean, thats what he got from Fla). They could have had quite a few stop-gap 3B had they shown much interest, or signed a guy like Feliz to make it easy and just trade him or make him a bench guy in 2009. Instead they passed everything up, and the talk of Crede seems more like "well, if it costs nothing in value going to the ChiSox maybe we can do it, but its something we really dont need so we wont be paying too much". The ChiSox saying "we'll just hold onto him until his value goes up" leads this making sense, dont ya think?
And I’m sorry, but Crede is a low BA and even lower OBP guy with huge FB tendencies being rumored to some of the hardest to hit in parks who are in a division where 60+% of his games will be in SD, LA & SF and another 5-10%-ish in Col & Arz where they have vast OFs. If I was Crede I would be begging not to be traded to this division, you see what it did to the Feliz value afterall… I don’t know if the teams are thinking this and lowering his value because of it, but his being in one of these parks while being off a situation where he missed so much time anyway ~ well, I really don’t think it will be pretty…
Posted by: darkstar1661 | March 09, 2008 at 03:05 PM
Crede's contact rate has gone up a lot since he came into the league, especially late 05 and 06. He's not a low BA guy, the question is whether he will hit for power. If the Giants don't want him that's fine with me, but it is obvious that members of the organization, like assistant GM Ron Schueler are pulling for him.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 09, 2008 at 03:58 PM
Crede - .259 lifetime BA.
Posted by: sweetswingingbw | March 09, 2008 at 05:24 PM
Yes, because he obviously is going to play like he did years ago.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 09, 2008 at 07:23 PM
Actually, yes.
What else is going to predict his next-year's batting average better than his previous major (.259, 2433 AB) and minor (.292, 2761 AB) league track record?
.292 over nearly 3,000 AB isn't even so bad, and yet here you hang your hat on a few hundred AB in 05 and 06. Why? The man is a bad hitter. His contact abilities aren't the issue: his limp, little, below-average hitting is.
Posted by: wcw | March 09, 2008 at 07:50 PM
Is it a foreign concept that players get better as they get older? Because that's what Crede did. I don't expect him to go backwards just because he missed a season.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 09, 2008 at 08:40 PM
I mean, seriously. His last two full seasons should say that he'll be at least a league average hitter. And now he's not playing with a hurt back. His glove makes him an adequate all around third basemen. The Giants want him as a long term piece.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 09, 2008 at 09:01 PM
"Is it a foreign concept that players get better as they get older?"
At age 30? Yes. 30-year-olds get worse, not better, as a rule.
"His last two full seasons should say that he'll be at least a league average hitter."
2005-2006 AB: 976
rest of MLB AB: 1457
minor league AB: 2761
I'll go with the sample size of 4000 AB that describes a well-below-average hitter, above the cherrypicked, peak-year 1000 AB that show a just-barely-average bat.
"And now he's not playing with a hurt back."
..because an injury history is the best possible portent of future health.
"His glove makes him an adequate all around third basemen."
Wait.. wait.. this is actually true! He is almost precisely 'adequate'. Or as Webster's has it, 'barely sufficient or satisfactory.'
That's Crede in a freaking nutshell.
"The Giants want him as a long term piece."
That's because Brian Sabean is an idiot.
There a reason you and every other Sox fan in this board wants Crede gone: he's adequate.
Man, what a denunciation.
Posted by: wcw | March 09, 2008 at 09:13 PM
By "adequate", I mean in about the 45-50th percentile or so. But that's your opinion.
I'm not saying he'll get better, but that he got better at age 27-28 and that was when he broke through and became a league average hitter.
And loads of players get better as they approach 30 and older. Guys like Jermaine Dye, Casey Blake, Torii Hunter have gotten better since hitting that plateu. It isn't automatic Crede will get worse as he gets older, and I predict he'll maintain league average hitting at least for a few more seasons. A player's peak year is age 29 on average
http://www.sabernomics.com/sabernomics/index.php/2004/03/age-and-batting-performance-in-mlb/
and since he missed his age 29 season, I think he will decline into seasons either at age 28(2006) or in between 06 and 05(slightly above league average).
And Crede's surgery improved his back and cleared up the problem. It isn't like he just rehabbed.
Posted by: gogopalehose | March 09, 2008 at 09:37 PM
People need to stop bringing up Crede's ST BA. It is a terrible thing to look at. Not only is BA a poor indicator of offensive value, but to use it when a player has had less than 20 ABs is very foolish.
Crede was told he could have surgery to fix his back 2 YEARS ago. He was also told there was a chance it got better by rehab and the like. He opted for just treating it and playing through. It didn't work out and he finally got the surgery. Everyone that has seen him in ST says he looks fine, and he is playing without any pain.
White Sox fans want to get rid of him because he will be gone through FA at the end of the year and they would rather the team gets SOMETHING in return. Fields is the future, and with Boras as his agent, Crede isn't likely to re-sign next offseason.
Posted by: rowdyoctopus | March 10, 2008 at 12:36 AM
Rowdy,
What else should teams look at who are interested in Crede? He has committed several errors already as well.
Of course he says he is fine. He wants to play. Back injuries reoccur very easily.
And if Sox want "something" in return as you say, they should except the Giants offer, whatever it is....
Giants are going to suck with or without him, so NO WAY they give up any real value. Sox may want to keep him anyway, Fields is also batting sub zero in S.T.
Posted by: zito4cyyoung | March 10, 2008 at 01:47 AM
Alot of Sox fans are saying Crede is healthy after his surgery.
If that is the case, how long will it take for him to show some positive results?
All I'm hearing now is, don't look at his BA in ST. Don't look at his OBP in ST.
Don't look at his errors in ST.
Don't look at his lifetime OBP, because he had back problems.
The surgery was a success.
If I'm a GM of another team, I do what they are doing. Offer very little until I see some positive signs.
Posted by: sweetswingingbw | March 10, 2008 at 08:50 AM
If I was a Sox fan I would be very nervous about this year. With Quentin and Richar hurt it looks like Uribe and Anderson will start. KW also hinted that he might send Fields down and start Crede at third.
If they start the season with Uribe, Crede, AJ, Cabrera and Anderson in the starting lineup, their team OBP might be worst than last year.
Posted by: sweetswingingbw | March 10, 2008 at 08:56 AM
So I come back to my original post.
Crede, Konerko, Uribe for Sanchez, Valdez, Winn, Velez and Matos.
Look at today's lead. All of the Giants listed except Velez & Matos are on the block.
It fits.
It helps both teams. Giants keep thier rotation, while getting pop on the corners and INF insurance.
And the Sox start seeing pieces falling into place while upgrading their pitching AND getting even younger.
Posted by: navylifer3 | March 11, 2008 at 12:37 AM